Predicting Severity in Hypertriglyceridemia-Induced Acute Pancreatitis: The Role of Neutrophils, Calcium, and Apolipoproteins

Abstract

Background

Hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis (HTG-AP), representing 10% of all acute pancreatitis cases, is characterized by younger onset age and more severe progression, often leading to higher ICU admission rates. This condition poses a significant challenge due to its rapid progression and the potential for severe complications, including multiple organ failure. HTG-AP is distinct from other forms of pancreatitis, such as those caused by cholelithiasis or alcohol, in terms of clinical presentation and outcomes. It’s essential to identify early markers that can predict the severity of HTG-AP to improve patient management and outcomes

Material/Methods

This study divided 127 HTG-AP patients into mild acute pancreatitis (MAP, n=71) and moderate-to-severe acute pancreatitis (MSAP/SAP, n=56) groups. Blood biological indicators within the first 24 hours of admission were analyzed. Risk factors for HTG-AP progression were determined using binary logistic regression and ROC curves

Results

Elevated levels of HCT, NLR, TBI, DBI, AST, Cre, and AMS were noted in the MSAP/SAP group, with lower levels of LYM, Na⁺, Ca²⁺, ApoA, and ApoB compared to the MAP group (p<0.05). NEUT%, Ca²⁺, ApoA, and ApoB were significantly linked with HTG-AP severity. Their combined ROC analysis yielded an area of 0.81, with a sensitivity of 61.8% and specificity of 90%.

Conclusions

NEUT%, Ca²⁺, ApoA, and ApoB are significant risk factors for progressing to MSAP/SAP in HTG-AP. Their combined assessment provides a reliable predictive measure for early intervention in patients at risk of severe progression.

Background

The most common cause of acute pancreatitis (AP) is cholelithiasis. In recent years, the number of patients with pancreatitis caused by hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) has increased year by year. It is reported that acute pancreatitis caused by HTG has risen to 10% of all cases of pancreatitis, and has become the third-leading pathogenic factor after cholelithiasis and alcohol in countries outside China [1,2]. Compared with other causes of AP, HTG-AP has a younger onset age, faster progression, and a higher proportion of patients who need to be admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) [3,4]. In our clinical work, we found that patients with HTG-AP may have mild symptoms at the onset of the disease, but they can quickly progress to severe disease, with multiple organ failure. Wenhua He [5] found higher proportions of pancreatic necrosis, infection, and organ failure in patients with HTG-AP than in the non-HTG-AP group. The severity in patients with HTG-AP was significantly higher than in those with biliary AP or alcoholic AP, and systemic complications were significantly higher in patients with HTG-AP than in those with biliary AP [6]. Early prediction of whether a patient will develop severe disease could help provide intervention as soon as possible and reduce the possibility of the patient developing severe disease.

Therefore, in this retrospective study, we reviewed and collected the data of 127 patients with HTG-AP in our hospital, analyzed the blood biological indicators within 24 h of admission, and analyzed the possible risk factors for progressing to severe of HTG-AP.

Material and Methods

Material and Criteria

This was a retrospective study. In our hospital electronic medical record database, we accessed information on 225 patients with HTG-AP diagnosed in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from October 2018 to July 2023. The inclusion criteria were:

1. The diagnosis of AP conforms to the Atlanta definition revised in 2012 [7], and the diagnosis of AP conforms to at least 2 of the following 3 criteria: 1) acute and continuous upper-abdominal pain; 2) serum amylase or lipase is greater than 3 times the upper limit of the reference; 3) typical imaging changes of AP;

2. Triglyceride (TG) >11.3 mmol/L or TG between 5.65–11.3 mmol/L, the serum is chylous, and imaging (B-ultrasound, CT, MRI/MRCP) examinations excluded cholelithiasis [8,9];

3. All cases have complete records, and there are no cases of midway discharge or non-compliance with medical advices;

4. Harvest of required laboratory indicators was completed within 24 h of admission. We excluded patients age <16 years, HTG-AP with pregnancy, and HTG-AP caused by drugs. Finally, 127 patients met the inclusion criteria. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University.

Grouping

The patients were divided into 2 groups, MAP and MSAP/SAP, based on the final outcome of the progression. The classification of MAP, MSAP, and SAP were according to the Atlanta classification and definition revised in 2012 [7], in which: MAP is defined as no local or systemic complications and organ failure; MSAP is defined as local or systemic complications or transient organ failure (<48 h), or both; and SAP is defined as local or systemic complications and persistent single or multiple organ failure (>48 h). According to the final outcome of pancreatitis, patients were divided into the MAP group (n=71) and the MSAP/SAP group (n=56).

Observation Indicators

We recorded data on general patient characteristics, including: age, sex, time from abdominal pain to hospital visit, history of pancreatitis, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and hypertension. Hematological indicators within 24 h of admission included: WBC, PLT, HCT, percentage of neutrophils (NEUT%), absolute value of neutrophils (NEUT), absolute value of lymphocytes (LYM), and ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes (NLR). Biochemical indicators were: total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), total bilirubin (TBIL), direct bilirubin (DBIL), indirect bilirubin (IBIL), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), urea nitrogen (UREA), creatinine (Cre), blood sodium (Na⁺), blood calcium (Ca²⁺), blood glucose (GLU), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), non-high-density lipoprotein (NHDL), apolipoprotein A (ApoA), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), apolipoprotein E (ApoE), lipoprotein a (LPa), amylase (AMS), and lipase (LIP).

Statistical Methods

SPSS 25 statistical software was used for data analysis and graphing, and the K-S method was used for all normally distributed data. The measurement data conforming to normal distribution was expressed in (X±s), and independent sample t test was used for comparison between the 2 groups. The non-normally distributed data are expressed by M (P₂₅, P₇₅), and the nonparametric rank sum test was used for comparisons between groups. We used the chi-square test for analysis of count data. The possible risk factors for developing to severity of HTG-AP were analyzed by binary logistic regression. The area under the curve, the sensitivity, and the specificity were calculated by drawing the subject characteristic curve (ROC curve). The cutoff value was the value corresponding to the maximum Youden index, Youden index=sensitivity-(1-specificity). The difference was statistically significant with P<0.05.

Results

General Clinical Characteristics

The average age of the 127 patients was 38.7 years, with a minimum age of 17 years and a maximum age of 68 years. Male patients accounted for 80%. Among all, 36.2% had a history of pancreatitis, 36.2% had a history of hyperlipidemia, 25.3% had a history of diabetes, and 11.1% had a history of hypertension. The indicator of WBC, NEUT%, TC, TG, ApoE, GLU, AMS, and LIP in HTG-AP patients were higher than the normal reference range, while LYM, Na⁺, HDL, ApoA, and ApoB were lower than the normal reference range.

There was no significant difference between the MSAP/SAP group and MAP group in age, sex, time from abdominal pain to hospital visit, history of pancreatitis, history of hyperlipidemia, history of diabetes, history of hypertension, WBC, PLT, NEUT, TP, AP, IBIL, ALT, ALP, UREA, TC, TG, HDL, LDL, NHDL, ApoE, LPa, GLU, LIP (P>0.05). HCT, NLR, TBI, DBI, AST, Cre, and AMS in the MSAP/SAP group were higher than those in the MAP group, while LYM, Na⁺, Ca²⁺, ApoA, and ApoB were lower than in the MAP group (P<0.05) (Table 1).

Table 1.

General clinical characteristics of MSAP/SAP and MAP groups.

Parameter	MAP (n=71)	MSAP/SAP (n=56)	P value	Normal reference range
Age(y) media (P25-P75)	39.59 (37.47, 41.71)	37.25 (34.85, 39.65)	0.146	---
Male gender(%)	55 (77.46)	47 (83.93)	0.145	---
From start of pain to hospaital (h) media (P25–P75)	16.00 (IQR 18.43, 29.26)	24.00 (IQR 17.18, 42.96)	0.544	---
Pancreatitis (%)	38	33.9	0.633	---
Coexisting condition (%)
Hyperlipemia	28.2	17.9	0.174	---
Diabetes	26.8	25	0.822	---
Hyperpiesia	12.7	8.9	0.503	---
WBC(×109) (X±s)	13.17±0.45	14.68±0.65	0.057	3.50–9.50
PLT(×109) (X±s)	244.28±8.38	230.41±9.50	0.275	125–350
HCT(%) (X±s)	44.16±0.51	46.67±0.81	0.006	40–50
NEUT(%) media (P25–P75)	81.4 (IQR 75.60, 86.20)	85.40 (IQR 81.25, 90.25)	0.000	40–75
NEUT(×109) (X±s)	10.70±0.45	12.82±0.59	0.055	2–7
LYM(×109) media (P25–P75)	1.64 (IQR 0.92, 2.24)	1.03 (IQR 0.63, 1.65)	0.016	20–50
NLR media (P25–P75)	6.93 (IQR 4.74, 11.56)	12.09 (IQR 7.70, 11.49)	0.001	---
TP (g/L) media (P25–P75)	73.42 (IQR 67.06, 81.90)	71.42 (IQR 62.31, 89.05)	0.622	65–85
ALB (g/L) media (P25–P75)	41.12 (IQR 39.04, 43.76)	40.18 (IQR 36.28, 44.06)	0.264	40–55
TBIL (umol/L) media (P25–P75)	15.51 (IQR 12.13, 19.08)	18.73 (IQR 12.72, 44.98)	0.048	0–23
DBIL (umol/L) media (P25–P75)	2.16 (IQR 1.27, 3.19)	3.46 (IQR 1.90, 6.65)	0.001	0–4
IBIL (umol/L) media (P25–P75)	13.13 (IQR 10.63, 16.28)	15.92 (IQR 9.87, 19.93)	0.377	0–19
ALT(U/L) media (P25–P75)	29.30 (IQR 18.58, 45.63)	23.85 (IQR 18.89, 37.05)	0.118	7–40
AST(U/L) media (P25–P75)	24.25 (IQR 18.17, 33.70)	30.28 (IQR 21.32, 44.91)	0.033	13–35
ALP(U/L) media (P25–P75)	78.02 (IQR 66.81, 108.62)	77.63 (IQR 60.55, 97.29)	0.129	50–150
UREA (umol/L) media (P25–P75)	4.63 (IQR 3.84, 5.56)	4.77 (IQR 3.76, 6.82)	0.356	2.6–7.5
Cre (umol/L) media (P25–P75)	52.20 (IQR 37.33, 65.71)	58.51 (IQR 44.38, 77.63)	0.039	41–73
Na+ (mmol/L) media (P25–P75)	132.60 (IQR 128.71, 135.43)	129.60 (IQR 125.08, 133.23)	0.008	135–147
Ca2+ (mmol/L) media (P25–P75)	2.38 (IQR 2.29, 2.47)	2.15 (IQR 1.86, 2.40)	0.000	2.11–2.52
TC (mmol/L)media (P25–P75)	10.84 (IQR 8.75, 14.51)	12.67 (IQR 9.80, 16.80)	0.175	<5.18
TG (mmol/L)media (P25–P75)	22.68 (IQR 17.66, 33.54)	22.99 (IQR 16.84, 33.65)	0.944	<1.7
HDL (mmol/L) media (P25–P75)	0.87 (IQR 0.56, 1.20)	0.87 (IQR 0.66.1.10)	0.998	1.16–1.42
LDL (mmol/L) media (P25–P75)	4.08 (IQR 2.17, 6.14)	4.54 (IQR 2.93, 8.58)	0.437	---
NHDL (mmol/L) media (P25–P75)	9.89 (IQR 7.54, 13.31)	10.34 (IQR 8.15, 14.83)	0.339	---
ApoA (g/L)media (P25–P75)	0.86 (IQR 0.71, 1.10)	0.76 (IQR 0.53, 1.00)	0.009	1–1.16
ApoB (g/L)media (P25–P75)	0.60 (IQR 0.36, 0.91)	0.31 (IQR 0.21, 0.69)	0.000	0.6–1.1
ApoE (mg/mL) media (P25–P75)	115.59 (IQR 19.91, 229.01)	134.28 (IQR 16.58, 223.55)	0.666	2.7–4.9
LP(a) (mg/L) media (P25–P75)	11.75 (IQR 3.93, 42.43)	26.48 (IQR 9.46, 40.69)	0.108	0–300
GLU (mg/L) media (P25–P75)	11.33 (IQR 7.41, 15.31)	12.25 (IQR 8.86, 18.03)	0.153	3.9–6.1
AMS(U/L)media (P25–P75)	124.95 (IQR 66.97, 208.59)	420.10 ( (IQR 149.25, 852.78)	0.000	17–115
LIP(U/L)media (P25–P75)	295.40 (IQR 141.36, 1219.60)	840.42 (IQR 99.20, 2886.68)	0.232	13–60

MAP – mild acute pancreatitis; MSAP – moderately severe acute pancreatitis; SAP – severe acute pancreatitis; y – years; h – hours; IQR – inter-quartile range; X±s – mean value±standard deviation; WBC – white blood cell; PLT – white blood cell; HCT – hematocrit; NEUT – absolute value of neutrophils; LYM – absolute value of lymphocytes; NLR – ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes; TP – total protein; ALB – albumin; TBIL – total bilirubin; DBIL – direct bilirubin; IBIL, indirect bilirubin; ALT – alanine aminotransferase; AST – aspartate aminotransferase; ALP – alkaline phosphatase; UREA – urea nitrogen; Cre, creatinine; Na⁺ – blood sodium (Na⁺); Ca²⁺ – blood calcium (Ca²⁺); TC – total cholesterol; TG – total glyceride; HDL – high-density lipoprotein; LDL – low-density lipoprotein; NHDL – non-high-density lipoprotein; ApoA – apolipoprotein A; ApoB – apolipoprotein B; ApoE – apolipoprotein E; LPa – lipoprotein a; GLU – blood glucose; AMS – amylase; LIP – lipase.

Binary Logistic Regression Analysis

Binary logistic univariate regression analysis showed that HCT (OR=1.11, 95% CI: 1.027, 1.199, P=0.009), NEUT% (OR=1.09, 95% CI: 1.035, 1.148, P=0.001), and Cre (OR=1.017, 95% CI: 1.005, 1.030, P=0.005) were independent risk factors for developing severe HTG-AP, while LYM (OR=0.666, 95% CI: 0.447, 0.991, P=0.045), Ca2⁺ (OR=0.025, 95% CI: 0.004, 0.142, P<0.001), ApoA (OR=0.271, 95% CI: 0.088, 0.834, P=0.023), and ApoB (OR=0.189, 95% CI: 0.065, 0.55, P=0.002) were independent protective factors against developing severe HTG-AP (Table 2). We selected HCT, NEUT%, Cre, LYM, Ca²⁺, ApoA, ApoB, and other parameters with P<0.05 in the binary logistic univariate regression analysis to carry out the binary logistic multivariate regression analysis. The results showed that NEUT% (OR=1.084, P=0.04, 95% CI: 1.004, 1.171), Ca²⁺ (OR=0.059, P=0.005, 95% CI: 0.008, 0.417), ApoA (OR=0.259, P=0.037, 95% CI: 0.073, 0.92), and ApoB (OR=0.291, P=0.049, 95% CI: 0.085, 0.994) are related to developing severe HTG-AP. The higher the NEUT%, the greater the possibility of developing severe pancreatitis, and a lower NEUT% is associated with less severity. Lower Ca²⁺, ApoA, and ApoB were associated with higher risk of developing severe pancreatitis, whereas higher Ca²⁺, ApoA, and ApoB were associated with less risk of developing severity disease (Table 3).

Table 2.

Binary logistic single factor regression analysis.

Variable	B	SE	Wald χ2	P value	OR	OR (95% CI)
HCT	0.104	0.040	6.921	0.009	1.110	1.027	1.199
NEUT%	0.086	0.027	10.597	0.001	1.090	1.035	1.148
LYM	−0.407	0.203	4.009	0.045	0.666	0.447	0.991
NLR	0.002	0.003	0.412	0.521	1.002	0.996	1.007
TBIL	0.009	0.011	0.752	0.386	1.009	0.988	1.031
DBIL	0.035	0.030	1.391	0.238	1.035	0.977	1.097
AST	0.000	0.004	0.000	0.991	1.000	0.993	1.007
Cre	0.017	0.006	7.779	0.005	1.017	1.005	1.030
Na+	−0.006	0.014	0.176	0.675	0.994	0.966	1.022
Ca2+	−3.702	0.892	17.227	0.000	0.025	0.004	0.142
ApoA	−1.305	0.573	5.184	0.023	0.271	0.088	0.834
ApoB	−1.664	0.544	9.362	0.002	0.189	0.065	0.550

HCT – hematocrit; NEUT% – percentage of neutrophils; LYM – absolute value of lymphocytes; NLR – ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes; TBIL – total bilirubin; DBIL – direct bilirubin; AST – aspartate aminotransferase; Cre – creatinine; Na⁺ – blood sodium (Na⁺); Ca²⁺ – blood calcium (Ca²⁺); ApoA – apolipoprotein A; ApoB – apolipoprotein B.

Table 3.

Binary logistic multifactor regression analysis.

Variable	B	SE	Wald χ2	P value	OR	OR (95% CI)
HCT	0.060	0.049	1.461	0.227	1.062	0.964	1.169
NEUT%	0.081	0.039	4.227	0.040	1.084	1.004	1.171
LYM	0.273	0.353	0.600	0.439	1.314	0.658	2.625
Cre	0.006	0.008	0.447	0.504	1.006	0.989	1.022
Ca2+	−2.836	1.000	8.038	0.005	0.059	0.008	0.417
ApoA	−1.349	0.646	4.364	0.037	0.259	0.073	0.920
ApoB	−1.233	0.626	3.877	0.049	0.291	0.085	0.994

HCT – hematocrit; NEUT% – percentage of neutrophils; Cre – creatinine; Ca²⁺ – blood calcium (Ca²⁺); ApoA – apolipoprotein A; ApoB – apolipoprotein B.

ROC Curve

The ROC curve of predictive efficacy of NEUT%, Ca²⁺, ApoA, and ApoB for the development of MSAP/SAP in patients with HTG-AP showed that the areas under the curve of NEUT%, Ca²⁺, ApoA, and ApoB predicting progression to MSAP/SAP were 0.70, 0.73, 0, 63, and 0.68, respectively, with their cutoff values of 78.55%, 2.175 mmol/L, 0.705 umol/L, and 0.495 umom/L, respectively, with sensitivity of 89.3%, 53.6%, 45.5%, and 71.4%, and specificity of 43.7%, 91.4%, 77.5%, and 64.8%, respectively. The combined prediction of NEUT%, Ca²⁺, ApoA, and ApoB for developing severe pancreatitis has an area under the ROC curve of 0.81, a sensitivity of 61.8%, and a specificity of 90% (Figure 1, Table 4).

Figure 1.

(A) ROC curve of NEUT% for severity prediction of HTGP; (B) ROC curve of Ca²⁺ for severity prediction of HTGP; (C) ROC curve of ApoA for severity prediction of HTGP; (D) ROC curve of ApoB for severity prediction of HTGP; (E) ROC Curve for combined prediction of HTGP severity by NEUT%, Ca²⁺, ApoA, and ApoB; (F) ROC curve for predicting HTGP severity using NEUT%, Ca²⁺, ApoA, ApoB, and a combination of the 4.

Table 4.

The predictive value of NEUT%, Ca²⁺, ApoA, ApoB, and their combination for the severity of HTGP.

Parameter	AUC (95%CI)	Optimal threshold	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)
NEUT%	0.703 (0.612, 0.794)	78.55%	89.3	43.7
Ca2+	0.725 (0.631, 0.818)	2.175 mmol/L	53.6	91.4
ApoA	0.637 (0.539, 0.734)	0.705 umol/L	45.5	77.5
ApoB	0.681 (0.586, 0.776)	0.495 umom/L	71.4	64.8
Combination	0.811 (0.734, 0.888)	–	61.8	90.0

NEUT% – percentage of neutrophils; Ca²⁺ – blood calcium (Ca²⁺); ApoA – apolipoprotein A; ApoB – apolipoprotein B.

Discussion

To predict progression of AP, clinical studies have used multiple scoring systems, imaging scores, and biomarkers, such as Ranson score, APACHEII score, CTSI and MCTSI imaging scores, IL-6, and serum Ca²⁺solubility [10–14]. However, most scoring systems need dynamic observation, and there are too many complex parameters to be included, and the clinical practicability is poor. The prediction accuracy of single biomarkers varies greatly, and the impact of pancreatitis of different etiologies on biomarker is also different [15]. The chief characteristic of patients with HTG-AP is the presence of abnormal lipid metabolism. Currently, it is generally believed that the pathophysiological mechanism of HTG-AP is related to excessive TG and the increase in free fatty acids produced after its metabolism [16]. Therefore, the level of TG is considered to be the main risk factor for whether HTG-AP will develop into severe illness. The incidence of severe illness, organ injury, and mortality in patients with high TG are higher than those in patients with low TG [17,18]. However, some studies have found that there is no significant correlation between TG and the severity of HTG-AP. For example, Hutchison et al [19] reported that there is no significant correlation between Ranson’s score and the TG level of HTG-AP patients. Wang et al [20] used 2648 mg/dL as the TG threshold, and divided 144 HTG-AP patients into high TG and low TG groups, finding no statistically significant difference in the length of ICU hospitalization or mortality in the 2 groups. They also confirmed that TG, TC, and progression to severe HTG-AP were not correlated, but they found that ApoA and ApoB were correlated with progressing to severe HTG-AP, and the higher ApoA and ApoB are, the less likely patients are to develop severe disease. Perhaps because HTG levels deplete apolipoproteins and lead to lower levels of apolipoproteins, the results showed that ApoA and ApoB were associated with the progression of a patient’s disease severity, but not with TG.

ApoA is considered to be the main protein component of HDL [21]. It has a vital role in reverse cholesterol transport and maintaining cellular cholesterol homeostasis. It is also deemed a protective lipid particle in preventing atherosclerosis, which can potentially reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases [22]. With the study of ApoA, we have discovered that it has functions that are not limited to cardiovascular protection alone, but has multiple roles in immune and inflammatory responses. ApoA can reduce inflammation by modifying the accumulation of cholesterol in lymphocytes, as well as their activation and proliferation, resulting in improved effectiveness of the T-regulatory response in the lymph nodes [23,24]. Additionally, ApoA can act as an anti-inflammatory agent by impeding the interaction between monocytes and T cells, and disrupting the signaling process between them, thus reducing the production of TNF-α and IL-1β. ApoA can suppress the inflammatory function of monocytes present in peripheral blood mononuclear cells that have been activated through antigen or lectin stimulation [25]. The development of severe HTG-AP may be related to the loss of anti-inflammatory function caused by low ApoA, and timely correction of low ApoA may slow progression of the disease.

ApoB is the major structure of low-density lipoprotein (LDL), intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL), and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) [21]. ApoB is thought to promote inflammation in the body. ApoB can enhance the ingress of lipoproteins into the wall of blood vessels and encourage macrophage phagocytosis, thus triggering inflammation [26]. In the context of rheumatoid arthritis, ApoB can aggravate the inflammatory response [27]. Our study found a negative correlation between ApoB and progression to severe disease in patients, and ApoB appears to have anti-inflammatory properties similar to ApoA in HTG-AP. However, further investigation is needed to elucidate the function of ApoB.

The ROC curve showed that in patients with HTG-AP, the specificity of NEUT% for the development of MSAP/SAP in patients with HTG-AP was lower, and the sensitivity of Ca²⁺ and ApoA were lower also. However, ApoB seems to be a reliable predictor of the likelihood of developing MSAP/SAP in patients with HTG-AP, both in sensitivity (61.8%) and specificity (90%). The combined prediction value of NEUT%, Ca²⁺, ApoA, and ApoB is the best. Therefore, in clinical work, when the initial blood test indicators of patients show NEUT%>78.55%, Ca²⁺ <2.175 mmol/L, ApoA <0.705 umol/L, and ApoB <0.495 umol/L, they may be developing severe illness. ApoB seems to be a reliable predictor for the likelihood of developing MSAP/SAP in patients.

Conclusions

Most HTG-AP patients are male, with a younger age of onset, and they often have a history of diabetes and hyperlipidemia. The indicator of WBC, NEUT%, TC, TG, ApoE, GLU, AMS, and LIP in HTG-AP patients are higher than the normal reference range, while LYM, Na⁺, HDL, ApoA, and ApoB are lower than the normal reference range.TG may be only an initiating factor for HTG-AP, and its level has no correlation with whether HTG-AP becomes severe. Univariate analysis showed that HCT, NEUT%, LYM, Cre, Ca²⁺, ApoA, and ApoB were associated with progressing to MSAP/SAP of HTG-AP, but in multivariate analysis, only NEUT%, Ca²⁺, ApoA, and ApoB were found to be associated with progressing to MSAP/SAP of HTG-AP. Compared with NEUT%, Ca²⁺, and ApoA, ApoB seems to be a reliable predictor of the likelihood of developing MSAP/SAP in patients with HTG-AP. The combination of NEUT%, Ca²⁺, ApoA, and ApoB can predict whether a patient will develop severe HTG-AP.