Abstract
This study reports on the validation of a real-time polymerase chain reaction test targeting the vomp region of Bartonella quintana. The assay displayed 100% sensitivity and specificity for the 52 bloods and 159 cultures tested. Molecular diagnosis of Bartonella quintana can aid clinical treatment during acute infection.
Keywords: Real-time PCR, Clinical diagnostics, Laboratory method
Human Bartonella quintana infection, transmitted via body lice, causes trench fever, endocarditis, bacillary angiomatosis, lymphadenitis, and peliosis hepatis [1]. Throughout World War I, B. quintana infected an estimated 800,000 Allied soldiers on the Western Front and accounted for at least one-fifth of illness in the British and Central Powers’ armies [2]. Infections today commonly occur in areas of high population density and poor sanitation, with persons experiencing homelessness at increased risk [3–6].
Humans are the main reservoir for B. quintana. The bacteria infect the bloodstream, causing fevers that last 2 to 4 days and relapse after 5 days intervals for several weeks [2,7]. Symptoms of B. quintana infection include headache, muscle and joint pain, chills, sweating, frequent urination, dizziness, nausea, and diarrhea. Although infection is typically not fatal, it can lead to significant morbidity, most commonly endocarditis, if untreated [1,7]. Diagnosis rests on clinical suspicion, as symptoms may be nonspecific [6,8]. Techniques for diagnosis include serology, culturing, and/or PCR. Serologic testing is not species-specific, may cross react with other pathogens, requires the host to develop a detectable antibody response to B. quintana, and is interpreted subjectively. Furthermore, persons infected with B. quintana can remain seroreactive for years after treatment [4,9,10]. Blood cultures are often negative, due to B. quintana’s fastidious nature and prolonged incubation time [10,11].
To help improve direct detection of B. quintana infection, this study focuses on the validation of a specific real-time PCR test for detection of B. quintana in blood or culture samples. We chose the vomp (variably expressed outer membrane protein) region as the DNA amplification target. The Vomp proteins (vompA-D) assist in escaping immune response through antigenic and phase variation [12]. Although the vomp region varies among B. quintana isolates, we designed oligonucleotides that bind to a conserved sequence that is present in at least 2 copies in all publicly available B. quintana genome sequences. They were confirmed to be specific to B. quintana by NCBI Primer BLAST [13].
Oligonucleotides consisted of a forward primer (5’CATCGCTCTGGTTATACTCTTATCGA3’), reverse primer (5’GATCCAAAATAACTTCCTGGGTCAT3’), and PrimeTime probe (5’/56-FAM/TGTATCGGCTGTTTTTGCCTCGACTTTACC/3BHQ_1/3’) (Integrated DNA Technologies; Coralville, Iowa). Each 20-μL PCR reaction included 750 nM concentrations of each primer and 250 nM of the probe, with PerfeCTa Multiplex Supermix (Quantabio; Beverly, MA). The run conditions included an initial denaturation at 95°C for 2.5 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 12 seconds and annealing at 60°C for 45 seconds. We used the human endogenous retrovirus ERV3 as an endogenous control with previously described oligonucleotide sequences [14]. All DNA extractions were performed using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen; Germantown, MD), unless otherwise specified.
We obtained all bacterial culture samples (Table 1) in house or from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). We performed PCR using 10 pg/reaction to assess analytic sensitivity and specificity. Among 18 different isolates of B. quintana, the average Ct was 26.80 (SD 1.26). 141/141 (100%) isolates for 40 non-B. quintana bacteria, including 15 other Bartonella species, were undetected.
Table 1.
Species | Number of isolates |
---|---|
Sensitivity | |
Bartonella quintana | 18 |
Specificity | |
Acinetobacter radioresistens | 1 |
Afipia felis | 1 |
Bartonella alsatica | 1 |
Bartonella bacilliformis | 30 |
Bartonella clarridgeiae | 5 |
Bartonella doshiae | 3 |
Bartonella elizabethae | 3 |
Bartonella grahamii | 2 |
Bartonella henselae | 55 |
Bartonella koehlerae | 2 |
Bartonella rochalimae | 1 |
Bartonella silvicola | 1 |
Bartonella tamiae | 1 |
Bartonella tribocorum | 1 |
Bartonella vinsonii | 1 |
Bartonella vinsonii subsp. arupensis | 1 |
Bartonella vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii | 1 |
Bartonella volans | 2 |
Bartonella washoensis | 1 |
Borrelia burgdorferi | 2 |
Borrelia hermsii | 1 |
Cedecea neteri | 1 |
Chlamydophila pneumoniae | 1 |
Enterobacter cloacae | 1 |
Escherichia coli | 2 |
Francisella tularensis | 2 |
Klebsiella oxytoca | 1 |
Klebsiella pneumoniae | 1 |
Legionella pneumophila subsp. pneumophila | 1 |
Leptospira interrogans | 1 |
Moraxella catarrhalis | 1 |
Mycoplasma pneumoniae | 1 |
Ochrobactrum anthropi | 1 |
Pasteurella multocida | 1 |
Proteus mirabilis | 1 |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa | 1 |
Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhi | 1 |
Staphylococcus aureus | 2 |
Staphylococcus epidermidis | 1 |
Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus | 1 |
Streptococcus pyogenes | 1 |
Yersinia pestis | 2 |
To assess the analytical limit of detection (LOD), we tested DNA from B. quintana ATCC 51694 in quantities ranging from 20 fg to 0.625 fg per reaction in 2-fold serial dilutions, with 8 replicates per dilution. All replicates down to 5 fg were detected, whereas 7/8 replicates of both the 2.5 fg and 1.25 fg were detected, and 3/8 replicates of the 0.625 fg were detected. We analyzed LOD by probit regression within the MedCalc software (MedCalc Software Ltd; Ostend, Belgium). The resulting LOD was 2.750 ± 0.859 fg/reaction (1.6 genome equivalents based on B. quintana’s median genome size in GenBank).
To assess the LOD in blood, we tested EDTA blood spiked with B. quintana OK90–268 at 3 concentrations in 15 to 20 replicates. We grew isolates on sheep blood agar for 48 to 72 hours at 37°C with 5% CO2, and prepared standardized cell suspensions using a turbidity meter. We then spiked the suspensions into EDTA whole blood from healthy human donors (Innovative Research; Novi, MI) to the final concentrations of 1.2 × 102, 1.2 × 103, and 1.2 × 104 colony forming units (CFU/mL). B. quintana DNA was detected in 20/20 replicates at both higher concentrations and in 6/15 replicates of the 1.2 × 102 CFU/mL concentration, for an estimated LOD of 1.2 × 103 CFU/mL.We also tested EDTA whole blood from healthy human donors (Reprocell; Beltsville, MD) to ensure B. quintana was not detected in the blood of healthy individuals. All (10/10) samples were undetected.
As B. quintana-positive clinical blood samples were not available to assess diagnostic sensitivity, we spiked 5 isolates of B. quintana (CA15–0058, CA15–0053, CO20–0321, CO20–0297, and CO20–0256) into EDTA whole blood from healthy human donors to a final concentration approximately 10 times the LOD (1.3 × 104 CFU/mL). We froze the samples at ≤−65°C, extracted DNA, and ran PCR in duplicate. All (10/10) samples were detected with an average Ct of 31.46 (SD 0.74).
To evaluate reproducibility, 2 of these spiked blood samples were tested in 6 runs by 2 operators over 5 days. The coefficient of variation of these results was 5.5%. Additional extraction methods were evaluated by spiking blood with B. quintana OK90–268 and extracting five replicates separately using either the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit protocol, the Roche MagNA Pure 96 instrument, or the Roche MagNA Pure 24 instrument (Roche Diagnostics; Indianapolis, IN). The coefficients of variation were 0.6% when comparing samples extracted with the QIAamp kit to the MagNA Pure 96 instrument, and 2.4% when comparing the MagNA Pure 96 and MagNA Pure 24 instruments (Table 2).
Table 2.
Analytical specificity | 100% (0/141 non-B. quintana bacteria detected) |
Analytical sensitivity (limit ofdetection) | 2.750 ± 0.859 fg/reaction (1.6 genome equivalents/reaction) |
Diagnostic specificity | 100% (0/42 samples from patients with other pathogens detected; 0/10 samples from healthy donors detected) |
Diagnostic sensitivity | 100% (10/10 human blood samples spiked with B. quintana detected) |
Reproducibility | 5.5% coefficient of variation (2 separately spiked samples tested in 6 runs by 2 operators) |
Extraction platforms: comparison of Qiagen QIAamp DNA Mini Kit and Roche MagNA Pure 96 instrument with DNA and Viral Nucleic Acid Small Volume Kit | 0.6% coefficient ofvariation (5 spiked samples extracted in parallel and run in the same run) |
Extraction platforms: comparison of Roche MagNA Pure 96 instrument with DNA and Viral Nucleic Acid Small Volume Kit and Roche MagNA Pure 24 instrument with Total NA Isolation Kit | 2.4% coefficient ofvariation (5 spiked samples extracted in parallel and run in the same run) |
The CDC Institutional Review Board (protocol #7102) approved the use of residual specimens for assay development and validation. We used residual EDTA blood previously identified positive for other bacterial pathogens to assess diagnostic specificity, including Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia chaffeensis, Ehrlichia muris subsp. eauclairensis, Leptospira kirschneri, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, and Rickettsia rickettsii [15,16]. All (42/42) bloods were undetected.
In conclusion, the vomp region of B. quintana targeted by real-time PCR in this study is highly specific and sensitive (Table 2), likely due to the presence of at least 2 gene copies per genome. This assay is specific to B. quintana and does not require additional testing to obtain a species-level diagnosis [6,10,17,18]. A limitation of this validation is the use of spiked samples to calculate diagnostic sensitivity. Real-time PCR targeting the vomp region provides a rapid and specific adjunct to blood culture for the diagnosis and clinical management of B. quintana bloodstream infections.
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Footnotes
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.
Disclosures
Residual diagnostic specimens were made available as part of a CDC TickNet Emerging Infections Program study.
The findings and conclusions in the manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
References
- [1].Angelakis E, Raoult D. Pathogenicity and treatment of Bartonella infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2014;44:16–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Anstead GM. The centenary of the discovery of trench fever, an emerging infectious disease of World War 1. Lancet Infect Dis 2016;16:e164–72. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30003-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Brouqui P, Lascola B, Roux V, Raoult D. Chronic Bartonella quintana bacteremia in homeless patients. N Engl J Med 1999;340:184–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199901213400303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].McCormick DW, Rowan SE, Pappert R, Yockey B, Dietrich EA, Petersen JM, et al. Bartonella seroreactivity among persons experiencing homelessness during an outbreak of Bartonella quintana in Denver, Colorado, 2020. Open Forum Infect Dis 2021;8:ofab230. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Spach DH, Kanter AS, Dougherty MJ, Larson AM, Coyle MB, Brenner DJ, et al. Bartonella (Rochalimaea) quintana bacteremia in inner-city patients with chronic alcoholism. N Engl J Med 1995;332:424–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199502163320703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Lam JC, Fonseca K, Pabbaraju K, Meatherall BL. Case report: Bartonella quintana endocarditis outside of the Europe-African gradient: comprehensive review of cases within North America. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2019;100:1125–9. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Foucault C, Brouqui P, Raoult D. Bartonella quintana characteristics and clinical management. Emerg Infect Dis 2006;12:217–23. doi: 10.3201/eid1202.050874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].García-Álvarez L, García-García C, Muñoz P, del Carmen Fariñas-Álvarez M, Gutiérrez Cuadra M, Fernández-Hidalgo N, et al. Bartonella endocarditis in Spain: case reports of 21 cases. Pathogens 2022;11:561. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11050561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Maurin M, Bartonella Raoult D. Rochalimaea) quintana infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 1996;9:273–92. doi: 10.1128/CMR.9.3.273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Ghidey FY, Igbinosa O, Mills K, Lai L, Woods C, Ruiz ME, et al. Case series of Bartonella quintana blood culture-negative endocarditis in. Washington, DC. JMM Case Rep 2016;3:e005049. doi: 10.1099/jmmcr.0.005049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Daly JS, Worthington MG, Brenner DJ, Moss CW, Hollis DG, Weyant RS, et al. Rochalimaea elizabethae sp. nov. isolated from a patient with endocarditis. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:872–81. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.4.872-881.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Zhang P, Chomel BB, Schau MK, Goo JS, Droz S, Kelminson KL, et al. A family of variably expressed outer-membrane proteins (Vomp) mediates adhesion and autoaggregation in Bartonella quintana. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004;101: 13630–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405284101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Ye J, Coulouris G, Zaretskaya I, Cutcutache I, Rozen S, Madden TL. Primer-BLAST: a tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. BMC Bioinformatics 2012;13:134. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Barletta F, Vandelannoote K, Collantes J, Evans CA, Arevalo J, Rigouts L. Standardization of a TaqMan-based real-time PCR for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-complex in human sputum. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2014;91:709–14. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Dietrich EA, Replogle AJ, Sheldon SW, Petersen JM. Simultaneous detection and differentiation of clinically relevant relapsing fever Borrelia with Semi-multiplex real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2021;59:e0298120. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02981-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Kingry L, Sheldon S, Oatman S, Pritt B, Anacker M, Bjork J, et al. Targeted metagenomics for clinical detection and discovery of bacterial tick-borne pathogens. J Clin Microbiol 2020;58:e00147–20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00147-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].McCormick DW, Rassoulian-Barrett SL, Hoogestraat DR, Salipante SJ, Sen-Gupta D, Dietrich EA, et al. Bartonella spp. infections identified by molecular methods, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 2023;29:467–76. doi: 10.3201/eid2903.221223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Vesty A, Henderson G, Blakiston M, Chhibber AV, Fox-Lewis A, Roberts S, et al. Evaluation of ssrA-targeted real time PCR for the detection of Bartonella species in human clinical samples and reflex sequencing for species-level identification. Pathology 2022;54:449–52. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2021.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]