Abstract
Histone methylation plays a crucial role in various cellular processes. We previously reported the in vitro function of histone lysine demethylase 7 A (KDM7A) in osteoblast and adipocyte differentiation. The current study was undertaken to investigate the physiological role of KDM7A in bone homeostasis and elucidate the underlying mechanisms. A conditional strategy was employed to delete the Kdm7a gene specifically in osterix-expressing osteoprogenitor cells in mice. The resulting mutant mice exhibited a significant increase in cancellous bone mass, accompanied by an increase in osteoblasts and bone formation, as well as a reduction in osteoclasts, marrow adipocytes and bone resorption. The bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) and calvarial pre-osteoblastic cells derived from the mutant mice exhibited enhanced osteogenic differentiation and suppressed adipogenic differentiation. Additionally, osteoclastic precursor cells from the mutant mice exhibited impaired osteoclast differentiation. Co-culturing BMSCs from the mutant mice with wild-type osteoclast precursor cells resulted in the inhibition of osteoclast differentiation. Mechanistic investigation revealed that KDM7A was able to upregulate the expression of fibroblast activation protein α (FAP) and receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL) in BMSCs through removing repressive di-methylation marks of H3K9 and H3K27 from Fap and Rankl promoters. Moreover, recombinant FAP attenuated the dysregulation of osteoblast and adipocyte differentiation in BMSCs from Kdm7a deficient mice. Finally, Kdm7a deficiency prevented ovariectomy-induced bone loss in mice. This study establish the role of KDM7A in bone homeostasis through its epigenetic regulation of osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation. Consequently, inhibiting KDM7A may prove beneficial in ameliorating osteoporosis.
Subject terms: Cell signalling, Osteoporosis, Stem-cell differentiation
Introduction
Bone homeostasis is a complex process fine-tuned by the dynamic well-balanced bone resorption and bone formation [1, 2]. The balance between the activity of osteoclasts, which remove old bone, and that of osteoblasts, which form new bone, determines the health and homeostasis of bone [1, 2]. If one of these two aspects is outpaced by the other, pathological conditions such as osteopetrosis or osteoporosis may occur [2, 3].
Multinucleated osteoclasts arise from osteoclast precursor cells, i.e., haematopoietic stem cell (HSC)-derived monocyte/macrophage lineage cells [4]. The essential factors that control osteoclast differentiation include macrophage/monocyte colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), both of which are expressed in bone microenvironment by bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), osteoblasts and osteocytes [4, 5]. In contrast, osteoblasts arise from bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, which also give rise to adipocytes, chondrocytes and myoblasts under appropriate conditions [6, 7]. The differentiation directions toward different lineages, especially those between osteoblasts and adipocytes, compete [8, 9]. Osteoblast differentiation necessitates the presence of two crucial transcription factors, namely runt related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) and osterix (Osx) [10, 11], while adipocyte formation requires peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) and CCAAT element binding protein α (C/EBPα) [9, 12]. Additionally, several signaling pathways are implicated in both osteogenesis and adipogenesis, with Wnt/β-catenin signaling [13] and transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ)/bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling [14] being the most extensively studied.
Post-translational modifications of histone tails, particularly methylation of lysines, play a role in regulating chromatin dynamics and transcription. The steady-state level of histone methylation is controlled by the balance between histone methyltransferases and histone demethylases. Several histone demethylases, such as lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1), lysine demethylase 4B (KDM4B) and lysine demethylase 6B (KDM6B), have been shown to regulate bone cell differentiation [15–19].
Lysine demethylase 7A (KDM7A), which catalyzes the removal of di-methylation marks H3K9m2 and H3K27m2, belongs to the family of Jumonji C (JmjC) domain-containing histone demethylases [20]. KDM7A plays a role in various biological processes, including neural differentiation [21], anterior-posterior development [22], and cancer growth [23, 24]. We have recently reported that KDM7A reciprocally regulates in vitro differentiation of mesenchymal progenitor cells toward adipocytes and osteoblasts [25]. In the current study, we have investigated the physiological role of KDM7A in regulating bone cell differentiation and homeostasis in mice and elucidated the underlying mechanisms.
Results
Deletion of Kdm7a in osterix-expressing osteoprogenitor cells promoted bone mass accrual in mice
The Osx-Cre mice (Biocytogen #110131) used in our study have proven to be effective for genetic targeting in osteoblastic lineage [26]. Unlike the Osx1-GFP::Cre line (Jakson lab #006361), which exhibited malocclusion and mild skeletal defects at a young age [27, 28], the Biocytogen Osx-Cre mice did not develop dental abnormalities and had comparable bone volume to Kdm7afx/fx mice (Fig. S1A–K).
The targeting strategy for the generation of Kdm7afx/fx mice and Osx-Cre; Kdm7afx/fx (Kdm7a cKO) mice is illustrated in Supplemental Fig. S2A. Genotyping PCR confirmed the genotypes of the Kdm7a cKO and control Kdm7afx/fx mice (Fig. S2B). Kdm7a cKO mice were viable, fertile and had no gross physical or behavioral abnormalities. Compared to control mice, Kdm7a cKO mice did not exhibit abnormalities in body length, weight or bone length (Supplemental Fig. S2C–J).
The conditional deletion of Kdm7a was confirmed in long bone BMSCs by using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and Western blotting (Fig. 1A, B). Furthermore, deletion of Kdm7a increased H3K9me2 and H3K27me2 levels in BMSCs (Fig. 1C).
We used μCT to assess the changes in bone architecture. In 12-week-old male mice, there was no significant difference in trabecular bone volume/total volume (Tb. BV/TV, %) or trabecular bone mineral content/total volume (Tb. BMC/TV) between the two genotypes. However, the trabecular number (Tb. N, /mm) was slightly increased and trabecular spacing (Tb. Sp, mm) was slightly decreased (Fig. S3). At 24 weeks, however, both male and female cKO mice had greater cancellous bone mass in the proximal metaphysis of tibiae than control Kdm7afx/fx mice. Specifically, Tb. BV/TV, Tb. BMC/TV, and Tb. N were significantly increased by 96%, 122 and 55%, respectively, while Tb. Sp was reduced by 37% in the female cKO mice (Fig. 1D–H). Additionally, Tb. BV/TV, Tb. BMC/TV, Tb. N and Tb. Sp were changed by similar degrees in male Kdm7a cKO mice as compared to controls (Fig. 1I–M).
Moreover, Tb. BV/TV, Tb. BMC/TV and Tb. N were increased while Tb. Sp was decreased in lumbar vertebrae in Kdm7a cKO mice compared to control mice (Supplemental Fig. S4).
Osteoblasts were increased and bone formation was enhanced in Kdm7a cKO mice
We then explored the cellular biological basis underlying the bone phenotypes. There were more alkaline phosphatase (ALP)-positive osteoblasts were more in both female (Fig. 2A, B) and male (Fig. 2C, D) Kdm7a cKO mice than in control Kdm7afx/fx mice (increased by 46% in females and increased by 62% in males). Consistently, the serum level of procollagen type I N-terminal peptide (PINP), a bone formation marker, was increased in both female and male Kdm7a cKO mice (Fig. 2E, F). Dynamic bone histomorphometric parameters were measured in female mice to further assess bone formation. The results showed that mineral apposition rate (MAR), mineralizing surface/bone surface (MS/BS) and bone formation rate/bone surface (BFR/BS) were greater in Kdm7a cKO mice than in control Kdm7afx/fx mice (Fig. 2G–J).
Marrow adipocytes and osteoclasts were reduced and bone resorption was repressed in Kdm7a cKO mice
Alcian blue/hematoxylin/orange G (ABH/OG) staining of the tibial samples showed that the number and area of adipocytes were reduced by 60 and 68%, respectively, in females and by 73 and 81%, respectively, in males of Kdm7a cKO mice (Fig. 3A–F).
Moreover, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining revealed that the number of osteoclasts was reduced by 58% in female Kdm7a cKO mice (Fig. 3G, H) and by 42% in male (Fig. 3J, K) Kdm7a cKO mice compared to their respective controls. Consistently, the serum level of C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-1), a bone resorption marker, was significantly decreased in both female and male Kdm7a cKO mice (Fig. 3I, L).
Differentiation was dysregulated in osteoprogenitor cells from Kdm7a cKO mice
The potential of long bone BMSCs to differentiate into osteoblasts and adipocytes was assessed. Following osteogenic treatment, osteoblast differentiation from BMSCs was potentiated in Kdm7a cKO mice, as indicated by enhanced alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining and increased mRNA and protein levels of osteogenic factors such as Runx2, osterix, ALP and osteopontin (Fig. 4A–C). In contrast, under adipogenic condition, adipocyte differentiation from BMSCs was impaired in Kdm7a cKO mice, as indicated by decreased oil red O staining intensity and reduced mRNA and protein levels of adipogenic factors such as PPARγ, C/EBPα, fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4) and adipsin (Fig. 4D–G).
Similarly, compared with those of control mice, the differentiation potential of calvarial pre-osteoblastic cells toward osteoblasts was enhanced, whereas that toward adipocytes was suppressed in Kdm7a cKO mice (Fig. S5).
Furthermore, we assessed whether inhibiting KDM7A activity has any impact on the differentiation of wild-type BMSCs. The results showed that treatment with TC-E 5002, a selective inhibitor of the KDM2/7 subfamily, dose-dependently increased the levels of H3K9me2 and H3K27me2, stimulated osteogenic differentiation, and suppressed adipogenic differentiation in BMSCs (Fig. S6A–H).
Kdm7a deletion in osteoprogenitor cells suppressed osteoclast formation from osteoclast precursor cells
Under osteoclastogenic induction, bone marrow cells derived from Kdm7a cKO mice formed fewer osteoclasts and had lower mRNA and protein levels of osteoclastogenic factors such as nuclear factor of activated T cells 1 (NFATc1), cathepsin K (CTSK) and TRAP than those from control Kdm7afx/fx mice (Fig. 5A–D). We then conducted co-culture experiments to further confirm that KDM7A expression in osteoprogenitor cells regulates osteoclast differentiation. When co-cultured with wild-type bone marrow macrophages (BMM), either through direct cell-cell contact assay (Fig. 5E–H) or transwell assay (Fig. 5I–L), the BMSCs derived from Kdm7a cKO mice exhibited a suppressive effect on osteoclast formation. Additionally, compared with those derived from Kdm7afx/fx mice, these BMSCs downregulated the mRNA and protein expression levels of osteoclastogenic factors. Of note, the BMSCs derived from Kdm7a cKO mice had lower Rankl mRNA expression and a lower Rankl/osteoprotegerin (Opg) ratio than those from Kdm7afx/fx mice (Fig. 5M, N).
Kdm7a deletion in osteoprogenitor cells downregulated fibroblast activation protein α (FAP) and RANKL expression
RNA-seq data revealed differentially expressed genes in the calvarial pre-osteoblastic cells derived from Kdm7a cKO mice versus those from control Kdm7afx/fx mice, of which 212 genes were upregulated and 329 genes, including Fap and Rankl, were downregulated (Supplemental Fig. S7A, B). KEGG enrichment analysis revealed that these differentially expressed genes are associated mainly with extracellular matrix-receptor interaction, cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, and PI3K-Akt signaling pathway (Supplemental Fig. S7C).
The downregulation of FAP and RANKL at the mRNA and protein levels, respectively, was verified in Kdm7a-deficient long bone BMSCs by RT-qPCR and Western blotting (Fig. 6A, B). The serum levels of RANKL were significantly lower in both female (Fig. 6C) and male (Fig. S8A) Kdm7a cKO mice than in control mice. Furthermore, IHC staining of the tibial sections showed that both female and male Kdm7a cKO mice had fewer FAP-positive (female: Fig. 6D, E; male: Fig. S8B, C) and RANKL-positive (female: Fig. 6F, G; male: Fig. S8D, E) cells on the trabeculae than Kdm7afx/fx mice.
KDM7A targets FAP and RANKL to regulate osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation by removing H3K9me2 and H3K27me2
To further elucidate the mechanisms underlying KDM7A function, we performed ChIP assay to evaluate whether KDM7A modulates FAP and RANKL expression through modifying the status of histone methylation at their promoters. The results showed that the deletion of Kdm7a resulted in a reduction in KDM7A binding to the promoters of Fap and Rankl genes in primary BMSCs (Fig. 7A, D). Moreover, the deletion of Kdm7a augmented the presence of H3K9me2 and H3K27me2 on the promoters of Fap and Rankl genes (Fig. 7B, C, E, F). As a control, KDM7A occupancy at the locus 5 kb downstream of the transcription start site was not detected on either Fap or Rankl promoter (Fig. 7A, D), and the deletion of Kdm7a did not affect H3K9me2 or H3K27me2 levels at those loci (Fig. 7B, C, E, F). These data suggest that KDM7A directly regulates Fap and Rankl expression via an epigenetic mechanism.
It was previously reported that FAP inactivates canonical Wnt signaling, we therefore examined if Kdm7a deficiency activates Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Western blotting showed that the protein levels of phospho-low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 6 (LRP6) (S1490), phospho-glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) (S9) and non-p-β-catenin were increased in Kdm7a-deficient BMSCs (Fig. 7G).
FAP attenuated Kdm7a deletion-induced dysregulation of osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation
We further investigated whether FAP/Wnt signaling plays a role in mediating the regulation of osteogenesis and adipogenesis by KDM7A. Under osteogenic induction, Kdm7a deletion-induced osteogenic differentiation was attenuated by recombinant FAP. Briefly, the deletion of Kdm7a in BMSCs potentiated ALP staining and increased the mRNA and protein expression levels of osteogenic factors, which was mitigated by the presence of recombinant FAP (Fig. 8A–C). Moreover, Western blotting revealed that Kdm7a deletion-induced activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling was attenuated by recombinant FAP (Fig. 8D). In contrast, under adipogenic induction, the inhibition of adipogenic differentiation due to Kdm7a deletion was mitigated by recombinant FAP, as revealed by the changes in oil red O staining and expression levels of adipogenic factors (Fig. S9A–D).
Deletion of Kdm7a in osteoprogenitor cells prevented bone loss in ovariectomized mice
We further investigated whether the deletion of Kdm7a in osteoprogenitor cells has a beneficial role in maintaining bone homeostasis under pathological conditions. Twelve weeks after surgery, μCT analysis revealed a significant bone loss phenotype in OVX/Kdm7afx/fx mice compared to Sham/Kdm7afx/fx mice. Specifically, Tb. BV/TV, Tb. BMC/TV and Tb. N were decreased by 44%, 42 and 20%, respectively, in OVX/Kdm7afx/fx mice (Fig. 9A–D). By contrast, deletion of Kdm7a in osteoprogenitor cells not only increased bone mass in sham-operated mice, but also prevented bone loss in OVX mice. Specifically, compared to those in OVX/Kdm7afx/fx mice, Tb. BV/TV, Tb. BMC/TV and Tb. N were increased by 102%, 114 and 49%, respectively, in OVX/Kdm7a cKO mice (Fig. 9A–D).
Furthermore, histological analysis revealed that, compared with those in Sham/Kdm7afx/fx mice, ALP-positive osteoblast number was reduced by 34% (Fig. 9E, F), while marrow adipocyte number, adipocyte area, and osteoclast number were increased by 260%, 386%, and 55% respectively in OVX/Kdm7afx/fx mice (Fig. 9G–K). In contrast, deletion of Kdm7a in osteoprogenitor cells resulted in an increase in osteoblast number (Fig. 9E, F) and a decrease in marrow adipocyte number, adipocyte area and osteoclast number in both sham and OVX mice (Fig. 9G–K). Specifically, in comparison to those in OVX/Kdm7afx/fx mice, osteoblast number was increased by 129% (Fig. 9E, F), while adipocyte number, adipocyte area, and osteoclast number were decreased by 65%, 67%, and 55% respectively in OVX/Kdm7a cKO mice (Fig. 9G–K).
Discussion
We have recently characterized KDM7A as a regulator of osteoblast and adipocyte differentiation in vitro, attributed to its epigenetic regulation of secreted frizzled-related protein 1 (Sfrp1) and C/ebpα gene expression via removing di-methylation marks of histones H3K9 and H3K27 [25]. In the current study, Kdm7a cKO mice in which KDM7A function was lost in osterix-expressing osteoprogenitor cells were generated. Although only mild changes in trabecular number and trabecular spacing were observed in 12-week-old young mice, a dramatic increase in bone mass was observed in 24-week-old female and male Kdm7a cKO mice, indicating an age-related trend. The deletion of Kdm7a resulted in an increase in osteoblast number and a decrease in marrow fat, augmented dynamic bone histomorphometric parameters reflecting osteoblast activity including MAR, MS/BS and BFR/BS, and increased serum levels of PINP, an indicator of bone formation. Consistently, osteogenic differentiation was enhanced in both BMSCs and pre-osteoblastic cells derived from the cKO mice. In contrast, their ability to differentiate into adipocytes was blunted. Moreover, TC-E 5002, a selective inhibitor of the KDM2/7 subfamily, promoted osteogenic differentiation and suppressed adipogenic differentiation. Collectively, these data demonstrate that KDM7A plays a key role in osteoblast differentiation and bone formation in mice.
Interestingly, the Kdm7a cKO mice had fewer osteoclasts and a decreased serum level of CTX-1, an indicator of bone resorption. Moreover, bone marrow cells derived from Kdm7a cKO mice had a decreased tendency toward osteoclast differentiation. Since Kdm7a gene deletion is restricted to osterix-expressing osteoprogenitor cells, it is hypothesized that KDM7A regulation of osteoclasts and bone resorption is based on an indirect mechanism, i.e., KDM7A in osteoprogenitor cells may control osteoclast differentiation via modulating some osteoclast regulator(s) in osteoprogenitor cells. In line with this hypothesis, the Kdm7a deficient BMSCs exhibited an inhibitory effect on osteoclast differentiation when co-cultured with BMM cells in both cell-cell contact and transwell assays. These findings suggest that at least a paracrine regulation is involved in KDM7A-regulated osteoclastogenesis. Therefore KDM7A has dual roles in regulating both osteoblastic bone formation and osteoclastic bone resorption. Notably, deletion of Kdm7a in osteoprogenitor cells led to an increase in osteoblasts, a decrease in adipocytes and osteoclasts, and prevented bone loss in ovariectomized mice. These findings suggest that inhibiting KDM7A in osteoprogenitor cells might be a promising strategy for ameliorating osteoporosis.
By now the mechanism by which KDM7A regulates osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation is the main topic of interest. Transcriptomics analysis revealed hundreds of target genes that were either downregulated or upregulated in Kdm7a deficient cells, among which the most notable two were Fap and Rankl. Of note, the expression of Sfrp1 and C/ebpα was not drastically altered in Kdm7a deficient pre-osteoblastic cells. This suggest that SFRP1 and C/EBPα are not the major players in mediating the physiological role of KDM7A in the bones of mice.
While RANKL is a crucial osteoclastogenic cytokine in both membrane-bound and soluble forms, FAP has recently been identified to be a regulator of osteogenesis and bone formation [29], as well as a pathological factor in osteoarthritis [30]. As a homodimeric integral membrane gelatinase, FAP belongs to the serine protease family and is involved in a variety of biological processes [31]. In bone, genetic loss of Fap gene ameliorates limb trabecular bone loss during aging. Inhibition of FAP activity stimulates bone formation via Wnt/β-catenin signaling [29]. In this study, consistent with the RNA-seq results, we further revealed the downregulation of FAP and RANKL in the BMSCs, calvarial pre-osteoblastic cells and bones of conditional Kdm7a null mice. These highlight the association of altered expression levels of FAP and RANKL with the bone phenotypes observed in Kdm7a cKO mice.
Although there is convincing evidence that bone formation was enhanced in Fap-/- mice and that pharmacological inhibition of FAP promoted osteoblast differentiation [29], the direct effect of FAP on osteoblast differentiation remains to be explored. In this study, recombinant FAP suppressed osteoblast differentiation from control BMSCs. Moreover, Kdm7a deficiency-induced osteoblast differentiation in BMSCs was mitigated by recombinant FAP.
Notably, we observed that recombinant FAP strongly stimulated adipocyte differentiation from BMSCs. Moreover, the Kdm7a deficiency-induced suppression of adipocyte differentiation in BMSCs was mitigated by recombinant FAP. This contradicts the findings of Blomberg et al., who reported the enhancement of adipogenic differentiation in mammary adipose stromal cells derived from Fap-/- mice [32]. This discrepancy may be due to the differences in cell types and/or culturing conditions. It is noted that in Blomberg et al.’s study, the adipose stromal cells were cultured on cell-derived matrices [32], while in our study we cultured the cells on common plates using a standard protocol. However, the exact mechanism for this discrepancy needs to be further investigated.
H3K9me2/3 and H3K27me2/3 are preferentially associated with transcriptional repression [33, 34]. KDM7 subfamily demethylases catalyze the removal of H3K9me2/1 and H3K27me2/1, creating a more permissive chromatin environment for gene transcription [20, 35–37]. Based on our novel finding that KDM7A in osteoprogenitor cells stimulated the expression of Fap and Rankl, we hypothesized that KDM7A functions in regulating osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation by demethylating H3K9me2 and/or H3K27me2 marks on the promoters of Fap and Rankl genes. The subsequent ChIP experiment demonstrated that the presence of KDM7A on either Fap or Rankl promoter was decreased in Kdm7a-deficient cells, indicating that KDM7A can bind to the promoters of Fap and Rankl. Furthermore, conditional deletion of Kdm7a increased H3K9me2 and H3K27me2 on the promoter of Fap and Rankl. These results indicate that KDM7A plays a key role in bone cell fate decision by removing H3K9me2 and H3K27me2 marks, thus derepressing the expression of Fap and Rankl.
Canonical Wnt signaling is widely accepted as a pivotal pathway that controls skeletal development and homeostasis by regulating the differentiation of BMSCs [13, 38, 39]. Although the exact downstream substrate involved remains to be determined, FAP has been shown to inactivate Wnt/β-catenin signaling [29]. We have previously reported that KDM7A inactivats canonical Wnt pathway in vitro [25]. Herein we observed the upregulation of canonical Wnt signaling activity in Kdm7a-deficient BMSCs, which was mitigated by recombinant FAP. These findings suggest that the downregulation of canonical Wnt signaling by KDM7A is at least partially mediated by FAP.
In conclusion, our work has characterized the physiological role of KDM7A in osteoprogenitor cells as a regulator of bone homeostasis. It suppresses osteoblast differentiation and bone formation through upregulating FAP expression and inactivating canonical Wnt signaling, and conversely promotes osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption through upregulating RANKL expression. These are associated with its epigenetic removal of the repressive H3K9me2 and H3K27me2 marks from Fap and Rankl promoters. As a result, KDM7A in osteoprogenitor cells tends to negatively modulate bone mass, and downregulation of KDM7A ameliorates bone loss in OVX mice. Our study provides new insights into the epigenetic mechanisms underlying bone homeostasis.
One limitation of the study is that the physiological role of KDM7A is concluded mainly based on animal data. Further research needs to be conducted to more conclusively determine the relevance of KDM7A to human bone disorders such as osteoporosis.
Materials and methods
Animals
The Osx-cre mouse which targets Osx-expressing osteoprogenitor cells was purchased from Biocytogen (Beijing, China; https://www.biocytogen.com.cn/models/tool/Cre/B-Sp7-iCre-mice.html; #110131). It was generated by placing an F2A-iCre sequence between exon 2 and 3’UTR of osterix gene in C57BL/6 embryonic stem cells. The Kdm7a floxed mouse which contains LoxP sites flanking exon 2 of mouse Kdm7a was generated via CRISPR/Cas9 technology by GemPharmatech (Nanjing, China). Kdm7afx/fx mice were crossed with Osx-cre mice to generate the knock-out line Osx-cre; Kdm7afx/fx (Kdm7a cKO). The sequences of primers used for genotyping are listed in Supplemental Table 1.
To investigate the bone phenotypes of Kdm7a cKO mice, Kdm7afx/fx mice were used as controls. To investigate whether deletion of Kdm7a in osteoprogenitor cells prevents ovariectomy (OVX)-induced bone loss, 12-week-old female cKO and Kdm7afx/fx mice were subjected to OVX or sham operation under anesthesia. For each genotype, the mice for OVX and sham operations were randomly allocated. Twelve weeks after surgery, tibial samples were collected and bone morphometric parameters were analyzed via μCT followed by histological staining.
Animal experiments were carried out the Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines [40]. The sample size for the animal experiments was determined based on a survey of data from published papers. Five mice were housed per cage in a standard individually ventilated cage (IVC) system (Tecniplast, Italy) in an SPF facility maintained under controlled temperature (22 °C) and humidity (50–60%), as well as a 12 h dark:12 h light cycle. The mice were given free access to autoclaved water and food. All the experimental animals were located in the same animal room and subjected to the same environmental conditions to avoid confounding factors. All animals with correct genotypes were included in data collection. The animal protocol and experimental methods were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Tianjin Medical University and Chu Hsien-I Memorial Hospital.
μCT analysis
Tibial and lumbar vertebral samples from 24-week-old mice were scanned using a Scanco viva CT80 (Scanco Medical AG, Switzerland) operated with the following parameters: voxel size of 10.4 μm, energy at 55 kVp, intensity of 145 μA, FOV/Diameter of 31.9 mm, and 300 msec integration time. The measurements were quantitatively analyzed. Three-dimensional reconstructions were made using Scanco software. The region of interest for histomorphometric parameters was selected in the 1 mm region starting 0.2 mm below the growth plate.
Cell cultures
Primary BMSCs were isolated from the marrow of 6-week-old mice and cultured following a previously described procedure [41]. Pre-osteoblastic cells were isolated from the calvaria of 3-day-old mice. Briefly, the calvaria were minced into 1 mm×1 mm tissue blocks and subjected to five rounds of digestion using an enzyme mixture consisting of 0.25% trypsin and 0.1% type I collagenase at 37 °C. The cells collected from the last 4 digestions were pooled, centrifuged, resuspended and cultured in α-MEM supplemented with 10% FBS.
The cells were passaged at 80% confluence and those at passages 3–5 were induced to allow osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation following a previously published protocol [41]. In certain experiments aimed at investigating the underlying mechanisms, cells were treated with 200 ng/ml recombinant FAP (Sino Biological), or TC-E 5002 (MedChemExpress, USA), a selective inhibitor of the KDM2/7 subfamily, at doses of 10, 20 and 40 μmol/l.
Oil red O staining
After 5–6 days of adipogenic differentiation, differentiated adipocytes were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, washed with PBS, and rinsed with 60% isopropanol. The cells were stained with 0.24% fresh oil red O solution for 5 min. To quantify the intensity of the staining, the oil red O dye retained in the cells was extracted using isopropanol, and the optical density was measured at 520 nm.
Staining of differentiated osteoblasts
Differentiated osteoblasts were subjected to ALP staining after 14 days of osteogenic induction, or to alizarin red staining after 21 days of induction as per a previously published procedure [41]. To quantify the intensity of the alizarin red staining, the stained cultures were destained with a solution containing 0.5 mol/L HCl and 5% SDS for 10 min, and the absorbance of the solution was read at 415 nm.
ALP activity measurement
Cell extract was diluted 5-fold and incubated with para-nitrophenyl phosphate (pNPP) liquid substrate (Beyotime Biotech, Shanghai, China) for 5 min at 37 °C. The absorbance was measured at OD405 on a microplate reader after addition of the termination solution. For normalization, total protein concentration was measured using a BCA protein assay kit (EpiZyme, Shanghai, China) and OD562 was measured. The OD405 value was divided by OD562 value to generate a standardized value for each sample.
RT-qPCR
Total RNA was extracted from cultured cells using a kit (Omega Biotek, Norcross, GA) or from tissues using RNAiso (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). cDNA synthesis and quantitative PCR amplification were performed using PerfectStart Uni RT&qPCR Kit (TransGen, Beijing, China). The expression levels of target genes were calculated by comparative Ct (ΔΔCt) method using β-actin as an internal reference. The primer sequences are listed in Supplemental Table S1.
RNA-seq
Total RNA was isolated from calvarial cells of Kdm7a cKO mice and Kdm7afx/fx mice. The RNA-seq transcriptome library was prepared with 1 μg of total RNA, and subsequently sequenced on the MGISEQ-2000 platform (sequencing length: PE150) by Beijing Genomics Institute (Wuhan, China). Gene Ontology functional enrichment and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses were conducted.
Western blotting
Cells were lysed in RIPA lysis buffer and protein concentration was measured using a BCA assay kit (EpiZyme). The proteins were separated via 10% SDS-PAGE, and then transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were incubated with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight, followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. Protein bands were detected with a chemiluminescence kit (Epizyme). The primary antibodies used are listed in Supplemental Table S2.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay
ChIP assay was performed using an ABclonal kit (Wuhan, China). Briefly, mouse BMSCs were incubated with 1% formaldehyde for cross-linking, and then sonicated to generate 200–500 bp genomic DNA fragments. The cell lysates containing chromatin complexes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with 5 μg of anti-KDM7A (Biorbyt, orb67004), anti-H3K9me2 (ABclonal, A2359), anti-H3K27me2 antibody (ABclonal, A2362) or IgG, and then incubated with protein A/G beads to capture the immunocomplexes for 2 h at 4 °C. The de-crosslinked and purified DNA was used as a template to PCR-amplify mouse Rankl or fibroblast activation protein α (Fap) promoter sequences. Data are expressed as the percentage of input DNA. The primer sequences for ChIP-qPCR are listed in Supplemental Table S1.
Osteoclast differentiation from bone marrow cells
Bone marrow cells isolated from the long bones of 6-week-old Kdm7a cKO mice or Kdm7afx/fx mice were seeded into a 48-well plate at the density of 4×105 cells/well. The cells were cultured in α-MEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 20 ng/ml M-CSF (Sino Biological, Beijing, China) for 3 days, and then induced with 20 ng/ml M-CSF and 5 × 10−7 mol/l 1,25(OH)2D3 (APExBIO, USA) to allow osteoclast differentiation. The medium was refreshed every 3 days. After 8 days of induction, the cultures were stained with a TRAP staining kit (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). TRAP-positive multinucleated osteoclasts (≥3 nuclei) were counted.
Osteoclast differentiation from co-cultures
Bone marrow cells were collected from 10- to 14-day-old C57BL/6 J mice and cultured in α-MEM containing 10% FBS. After 24 h, the nonadherent BMM cells were collected.
For cell-cell contact co-culturing, BMM cells were seeded into a 24-well plate at the density of 5×105 cells/well. After 3 days of culturing in α-MEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 20 ng/ml M-CSF, the BMSCs from Kdm7a cKO or Kdm7afx/fx mice were seeded into the cultures at the density of 5,000 cells/well. The co-cultures were induced with 20 ng/ml M-CSF and 5 × 10−7 mol/l 1,25(OH)2D3 to allow osteoclast differentiation.
Transwell co-culturing was conducted using 24-well transwell plates with 0.4 μm membrane pores (Biofil, Guangzhou, China). Briefly, BMM cells were seeded into the transwell bottom compartment at the density of 5×105 cells/well and cultured in the presence of 20 ng/ml M-CSF. The BMSCs from Kdm7a cKO or Kdm7afx/fx mice were seeded into the top compartment at the density of 5,000 cells/well and cultured in the presence of 5 × 10−7 mol/l 1,25(OH)2D3. The medium was refreshed every 3 days. After 8 days of induction, TRAP staining was performed and osteoclasts were counted.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
ELISA was conducted following the manufacturer’s protocols to measure the levels of serum CTX-1 (SAB, College Park, MD, USA), RANKL (SAB), and PINP (SAB).
Histological staining
Bone samples were fixed with 10% formalin for 3 days, decalcified with 14% EDTA (pH 7.4) for 21 days, and embedded in paraffin. Then the samples were cut into 4-μm thick sections. Deparaffinized and rehydrated sections were stained with standard ABH/OG and hematoxylin/eosin (H&E). Marrow adipocyte number was counted and adipocyte area was measured. To identify osteoclasts, TRAP staining was performed using staining solution containing 0.1 mol/l sodium acetate (pH 5.0), 0.5 mol/l L-(+) tartaric acid, 0.2 mmol/l naphthol AS-MX and 1.5 mmol/l fast red violet LB salt. TRAP-positive osteoclasts were counted. The region of interest is 1 mm long starting from 0.2 mm below the growth plate.
Immunohistochemical staining
For antigen repair, the deparaffinized and rehydrated sections were digested with 0.075% trypsin at 37 °C for 15 min. After removing endogenous peroxidase with 3% H2O2 and blocking with 1% BSA, the sections were probed with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C, and then incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies for 2 h at 4 °C. The primary antibodies used included anti-ALP (Huabio, Hangzhou, China), anti-RANKL (WL00285, Wanleibio, Shenyang, China) and anti-FAP (WL04890, Wanleibio). A 3,3’-diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining kit (GeneTech, Shanghai, China) was applied to visualize the staining. The nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin.
Dynamic bone histomorphometry
Twenty-four-week-old female mice were injected intraperitoneally twice with calcein (Sigma, USA) at the dose of 10 mg/kg 2 and 7 days, respectively, prior to sacrifice. The femur samples were dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol and embedded, non-decalcified, in methyl methacrylate resin and sectioned at 8-μm thickness using a microtome (Leica RM2155, Wetzlar, Germany). The region of interest is 1 mm long starting from 0.2 mm below the growth plate. The unlabelled perimeter, single-labelled perimeter, double-labelled perimeter, and the area between the double labels were measured using the OsteoMeasure software (OsteoMetrics, Atlanta, GA, USA). Histomorphometric parameters, including MAR, MS/BS, and BFR/BS were calculated.
Data illustration and statistical analysis
Cell-based experiments were performed independently 5 times. The relative levels of mRNAs and proteins in the control group were set to 1. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8.0 in a blinded manner. Data are presented as box-and-whiskers plots in which the boxes extend from the 25th to 75th percentiles, and the lines in the middle of the boxes indicate medians; all individual values are shown and the whiskers represent the minimum and maximum values.
Data were initially subjected to normal distribution analysis using Kolmogorov-Smirnov nonparametric test. For the comparisons between two groups, two-tailed unpaired independent Student’s t test was conducted, with Welch’s correction when there was unequal variance. For comparisons among multiple groups, One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test was conducted. P < 0.05 was regarded as significantly different.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) for funding.
Author contributions
LS, XY, XL, ZY: Investigation, data curation, validation and analysis. JZ, XL: project administration and supervision. BW: conceptualization, project administration and supervision, writing-review and editing, funding acquisition. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81871741, 82072389 and 82272444) and Tianjin Key Medical Discipline (Specialty) Construction Project (TJYXZDXK-032A).
Data availability
The RNA-seq datasets and original images for Western blotting are included in the supplemental information. All other data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics statement
All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Tianjin Medical University (TMuaMEc201720) and Chu Hsien-I Memorial Hospital (DXBYY-IACUC-2022054).
Footnotes
Edited by Professor Ying Wang
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Liying Shan, Xiaoli Yang.
Contributor Information
Jie Zhou, Email: zhoujie2012hi@163.com.
Xiaoxia Li, Email: Lixx@tmu.edu.cn.
Baoli Wang, Email: blwang@tmu.edu.cn.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41419-024-06521-z.
References
- 1.Weivoda MM, Bradley EW. Macrophages and Bone Remodeling. J Bone Miner Res. 2023;38:359–69. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Raggatt LJ, Partridge NC. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of bone remodeling. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:25103–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R109.041087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Weitzmann MN, Ofotokun I. Physiological and pathophysiological bone turnover - role of the immune system. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016;12:518–32. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2016.91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bae S, Kim K, Kang K, Kim H, Lee M, Oh B, et al. RANKL-responsive epigenetic mechanism reprograms macrophages into bone-resorbing osteoclasts. Cell Mol Immunol. 2023;20:94–109. doi: 10.1038/s41423-022-00959-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhou P, Zheng T, Zhao B. Cytokine-mediated immunomodulation of osteoclastogenesis. Bone. 2022;164:116540. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2022.116540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Grafe I, Alexander S, Peterson JR, Snider TN, Levi B, Lee B, et al. TGF-beta Family Signaling in Mesenchymal Differentiation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2018;10:a022202. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a022202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pierce JL, Begun DL, Westendorf JJ, McGee-Lawrence ME. Defining osteoblast and adipocyte lineages in the bone marrow. Bone. 2019;118:2–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2018.05.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chen Q, Shou P, Zheng C, Jiang M, Cao G, Yang Q, et al. Fate decision of mesenchymal stem cells: adipocytes or osteoblasts? Cell Death Differ. 2016;23:1128–39. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2015.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Muruganandan S, Roman AA, Sinal CJ. Adipocyte differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells: cross talk with the osteoblastogenic program. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66:236–53. doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-8429-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nakashima K, Zhou X, Kunkel G, Zhang Z, Deng JM, Behringer RR, et al. The novel zinc finger-containing transcription factor osterix is required for osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Cell. 2002;108:17–29. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00622-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mevel R, Draper JE, Lie ALM, Kouskoff V, Lacaud G. RUNX transcription factors: orchestrators of development. Development. 2019;146:dev148296. doi: 10.1242/dev.148296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhang J, Fu M, Cui T, Xiong C, Xu K, Zhong W, et al. Selective disruption of PPARgamma 2 impairs the development of adipose tissue and insulin sensitivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:10703–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403652101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lerner UH, Ohlsson C. The WNT system: background and its role in bone. J Intern Med. 2015;277:630–49. doi: 10.1111/joim.12368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wu M, Chen G, Li YP. TGF-beta and BMP signaling in osteoblast, skeletal development, and bone formation, homeostasis and disease. Bone Res. 2016;4:16009. doi: 10.1038/boneres.2016.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sun J, Ermann J, Niu N, Yan G, Yang Y, Shi Y, et al. Histone demethylase LSD1 regulates bone mass by controlling WNT7B and BMP2 signaling in osteoblasts. Bone Res. 2018;6:14. doi: 10.1038/s41413-018-0015-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ye L, Fan Z, Yu B, Chang J, Al Hezaimi K, Zhou X, et al. Histone Demethylases KDM4B and KDM6B Promote Osteogenic Differentiation of Human MSCs. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;23:898–9. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chen Q, Sinha K, Deng JM, Yasuda H, Krahe R, Behringer RR, et al. Mesenchymal Deletion of Histone Demethylase NO66 in Mice Promotes Bone Formation. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30:1608–17. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yi SJ, Jang YJ, Kim HJ, Lee K, Lee H, Kim Y, et al. The KDM4B-CCAR1-MED1 axis is a critical regulator of osteoclast differentiation and bone homeostasis. Bone Res. 2021;9:27. doi: 10.1038/s41413-021-00145-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Doi K, Murata K, Ito S, Suzuki A, Terao C, Ishie S, et al. Role of Lysine-Specific Demethylase 1 in Metabolically Integrating Osteoclast Differentiation and Inflammatory Bone Resorption Through Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1alpha and E2F1. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022;74:948–60. doi: 10.1002/art.42074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tsukada Y, Ishitani T, Nakayama KI. KDM7 is a dual demethylase for histone H3 Lys 9 and Lys 27 and functions in brain development. Genes Dev. 2010;24:432–7. doi: 10.1101/gad.1864410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Huang C, Xiang Y, Wang Y, Li X, Xu L, Zhu Z, et al. Dual-specificity histone demethylase KIAA1718 (KDM7A) regulates neural differentiation through FGF4. Cell Res. 2010;20:154–65. doi: 10.1038/cr.2010.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Higashijima Y, Nagai N, Yamamoto M, Kitazawa T, Kawamura YK, Taguchi A, et al. Lysine demethylase 7a regulates murine anterior-posterior development by modulating the transcription of Hox gene cluster. Commun Biol. 2020;3:725. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-01456-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Meng Z, Liu Y, Wang J, Fan H, Fang H, Li S, et al. Histone demethylase KDM7A is required for stem cell maintenance and apoptosis inhibition in breast cancer. J Cell Physiol. 2020;235:932–43. doi: 10.1002/jcp.29008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lee KH, Hong S, Kang M, Jeong CW, Ku JH, Kim HH, et al. Histone demethylase KDM7A controls androgen receptor activity and tumor growth in prostate cancer. Int J Cancer. 2018;143:2849–61. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yang X, Wang G, Wang Y, Zhou J, Yuan H, Li X, et al. Histone demethylase KDM7A reciprocally regulates adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation via regulation of C/EBPalpha and canonical Wnt signalling. J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23:2149–62. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.14126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liu J, Liang C, Guo B, Wu X, Li D, Zhang Z, et al. Increased PLEKHO1 within osteoblasts suppresses Smad-dependent BMP signaling to inhibit bone formation during aging. Aging Cell. 2017;16:360–76. doi: 10.1111/acel.12566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Salazar VS, Zarkadis N, Huang L, Norris J, Grimston SK, Mbalaviele G, et al. Embryonic ablation of osteoblast Smad4 interrupts matrix synthesis in response to canonical Wnt signaling and causes an osteogenesis-imperfecta-like phenotype. J Cell Sci. 2013;126:4974–84. doi: 10.1242/jcs.131953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Davey RA, Clarke MV, Sastra S, Skinner JP, Chiang C, Anderson PH, et al. Decreased body weight in young Osterix-Cre transgenic mice results in delayed cortical bone expansion and accrual. Transgenic Res. 2012;21:885–93. doi: 10.1007/s11248-011-9581-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wei H, Xu Y, Wang Y, Xu L, Mo C, Li L, et al. Identification of Fibroblast Activation Protein as an Osteogenic Suppressor and Anti-osteoporosis Drug Target. Cell Rep. 2020;33:108252. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fan A, Wu G, Wang J, Lu L, Wei H, Sun Y, et al. Inhibition of fibroblast activation protein ameliorates cartilage matrix degradation and osteoarthritis progression. Bone Res. 2023;11:3. doi: 10.1038/s41413-022-00243-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chen X, Song E. Turning foes to friends: targeting cancer-associated fibroblasts. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18:99–115. doi: 10.1038/s41573-018-0004-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Blomberg R, Beiting DP, Wabitsch M, Pure E. Fibroblast activation protein restrains adipogenic differentiation and regulates matrix-mediated mTOR signaling. Matrix Biol. 2019;83:60–76. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2019.07.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kouzarides T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell. 2007;128:693–705. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Beisel C, Paro R. Silencing chromatin: comparing modes and mechanisms. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12:123–35. doi: 10.1038/nrg2932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Park SY, Park JW, Chun YS. Jumonji histone demethylases as emerging therapeutic targets. Pharmacol Res. 2016;105:146–51. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Moubarak RS, de Pablos-Aragoneses A, Ortiz-Barahona V, Gong Y, Gowen M, Dolgalev I, et al. The histone demethylase PHF8 regulates TGFbeta signaling and promotes melanoma metastasis. Sci Adv. 2022;8:eabi7127. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abi7127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Qi HH, Sarkissian M, Hu GQ, Wang Z, Bhattacharjee A, Gordon DB, et al. Histone H4K20/H3K9 demethylase PHF8 regulates zebrafish brain and craniofacial development. Nature. 2010;466:503–7. doi: 10.1038/nature09261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Baron R, Kneissel M. WNT signaling in bone homeostasis and disease: from human mutations to treatments. Nat Med. 2013;19:179–92. doi: 10.1038/nm.3074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Matsushita Y, Nagata M, Kozloff KM, Welch JD, Mizuhashi K, Tokavanich N, et al. A Wnt-mediated transformation of the bone marrow stromal cell identity orchestrates skeletal regeneration. Nat Commun. 2020;11:332. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14029-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Xie Y, Zhou J, Tian L, Dong Y, Yuan H, Zhu E, et al. miR-196b-5p Regulates Osteoblast and Osteoclast Differentiation and Bone Homeostasis by Targeting SEMA3A. J Bone Miner Res. 2023;38:1175–91. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The RNA-seq datasets and original images for Western blotting are included in the supplemental information. All other data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.