Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2024 Jan 9;62(2):e01141-23. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01141-23

Trends in the activity of mold-active azole agents against Aspergillus fumigatus clinical isolates with and without cyp51 alterations from Europe and North America (2017–2021)

M A Pfaller 1,2, C G Carvalhaes 1,, P R Rhomberg 1, L M Desphande 1, M Castanheira 1
Editor: Kimberly E Hanson3
PMCID: PMC10865804  PMID: 38193696

ABSTRACT

Azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus (AFM) is increasing and often associated with cyp51 alterations. We evaluated the activity of isavuconazole and other mold-active azoles against 731 AFM isolates causing invasive aspergillosis collected in Europe (EU; n = 449) and North America (NA; n = 282). Isolates were submitted to CLSI susceptibility testing and epidemiological cutoff value (ECV) criteria. A posaconazole ECV of 0.5 mg/L was used as no CLSI ECV was determined. Azole non-wild-type (NWT) isolates were submitted for cyp51 sequencing by whole genome sequencing. Overall, isavuconazole activity (92.7%/94.0% WT in EU/NA) was comparable to other azoles (WT rate range, 90.9%–96.4%/91.8%–98.6%, respectively), regardless of the region. A total of 79 (10.8%) azole NWT isolates were detected, and similar rates of these isolates were noted in EU (10.7%) and NA (11.0%). Although most AFM were WT to azoles, increasing azole NWT rates were observed in NA (from 6.0% in 2017 to 29.3% in 2021). Azole NWT rates varied from 4.9% (2019) to 20.6% (2018) in EU without an observed trend. cyp51 alterations occurred in 56.3%/54.8% of azole NWT from EU/NA, respectively. The cyp51A TR34/L98H alteration was observed only in EU isolates (72.0% of EU isolates), while cyp51A I242V occurred only in NA isolates (58.3%). Isavuconazole remained active (MIC, ≤1 mg/L) against 18.5/47.1% of azole NWT AFM exhibiting cyp51 alterations in EU/NA, along with voriconazole (29.6/82.4%; MIC, ≤1 mg/L) and posaconazole (48.1/88.2%; MIC, ≤0.5 mg/L). Fourteen different cyp51 alterations were detected in 44 of 79 NWT isolates. The in vitro activity of the azoles varied in AFM that displayed cyp51 alterations.

IMPORTANCE

A few microbiology laboratories perform antifungal susceptibility testing locally for systemically active antifungal agents. The identification of emerging azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus is worrisome. As such, there is a critical role for antifungal surveillance in tracking emerging resistance among both common and uncommon opportunistic fungi. Differences in the regional prevalence and antifungal resistance of these fungi render local epidemiological knowledge essential for the care of patients with a suspected invasive fungal infection.

KEYWORDS: azoles, resistance, A. fumigatus, surveillance studies, Europe, North America

INTRODUCTION

Aspergillus fumigatus is the leading cause of invasive (IA) and other forms of aspergillosis (1). Although IA continues to be associated with considerable morbidity and mortality, the introduction of mold-active triazoles as therapeutic agents of choice for first-line therapy has resulted in substantial improvement in outcomes when compared to earlier therapy with amphotericin B (2, 3). Among the mold-active triazoles, itraconazole has been available since 1997, voriconazole since 2002, posaconazole since 2006, and isavuconazole since 2015 (2, 4). Voriconazole and isavuconazole are recommended as first-line agents for the treatment of IA, itraconazole remains useful for chronic and allergic noninvasive forms of aspergillosis, and posaconazole is effective as prophylaxis in neutropenic patients (2).

Over the past two decades, both the frequency of IA and resistance to azoles have increased throughout the world, with the highest rates of resistance reported from Europe (especially the Netherlands) followed by North America (mostly in the USA) (3, 5 8). There are two major routes for the development of azole resistance in A. fumigatus. The first is a patient-exposure route in which an infecting isolate is exposed to prolonged azole therapy (usually itraconazole) in the setting of chronic obstructive pulmonary aspergillosis or aspergilloma (9 11). The second is an environmental-exposure route in which infection is due to the inhalation of conidia that already harbor a resistance mechanism secondary to exposure to azole-type fungicides in an agricultural setting (3, 8, 11, 12). These two scenarios generate azole-resistant isolates with one or more alterations in cyp51A or its homologue, cyp51B (3, 8, 11, 12). In the patient-exposure route, the resistant strains of A. fumigatus harbor different single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) alone or in combination, most frequently at positions G54, M220, G138, or G448 in cyp51A. In the environmental-exposure route, SNPs along with tandem repeats (TR) of base pairs in the promoter region of cyp51A [most commonly TR34/L98H (TR34) and TR46/Y121F/T289A (TR46)] lead to increased expression of the altered cyp51A gene (3, 8, 11, 12). Other mutations in cyp51 have been associated with increased azole MIC values in A. fumigatus (8, 13). These mutations have been described as de novo mutations and are the result of extended exposure to azole antifungal agents (8, 13). Notably, between 25% and 50% of isolates of A. fumigatus with an azole-resistant phenotype are found to have no alterations in cyp51, suggesting that other mechanisms of resistance (MOR) are present, many of which are unknown (3). Regardless of the MOR, increased azole MIC values for A. fumigatus correspond with lower azole efficacy (3, 14). Alterations in cyp51 can have variable effects on the in vitro activities of individual azole antifungal agents (3, 8, 11 13). These effects are best delineated by testing all four triazoles (3). At present, it is unclear that infection with an isolate of A. fumigatus that is phenotypically resistant to one azole can be successfully managed using another azole agent with a susceptible or wild-type (WT) MIC value (14). Antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) of all four triazoles is recommended when the prevalence of resistance in A. fumigatus is greater than 5%. Monotherapy with a triazole is not recommended when the prevalence of resistance exceeds 10% (3, 14).

Previous reports from the SENTRY Antifungal Surveillance Program have demonstrated a predominance of azole-resistant A. fumigatus from Europe with a low level of decreased susceptibility to azoles in North America and the rest of the world (13, 15 19). These findings confirmed reports by other investigators showing that the frequency of azole resistance in clinical isolates from Europe ranged from 0% to 20% and in the USA from 1.5% to 5.0% (3, 8, 11, 12, 20 22). More recently, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported results from passive surveillance of azole resistance in A. fumigatus demonstrating that in 2011–2013, 5.0% of 1,026 US isolates expressed a non-wild-type (NWT) phenotype to itraconazole with no isolates harboring an environmental-type alteration in cyp51A (TR34 or TR46) (22). A repeat survey conducted in 2015–2017 found that only 1.5% of 1,356 isolates were NWT to itraconazole or voriconazole but documented the presence of the environmental alteration TR34 in 5 isolates (0.4% of the total) (21). These results, supported by other recent reports from four different states, indicate that isolates with the environmental-type resistance mutation are present in the USA (21, 23). In addition, recently a report from SENTRY showed that antifungal resistance among isolates of A. fumigatus appears to be increasing in North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region (24).

In the present survey, we assessed the frequency of triazole resistance among isolates of A. fumigatus from Europe and North America for the years 2017–2021. We report the MIC distributions for four mold-active azole antifungal agents (isavuconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole) and 731 isolates of A. fumigatus that were submitted to the SENTRY Antifungal Surveillance Program (JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, IA, USA) for reference identification and in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing by the CLSI broth microdilution (BMD) method. Isolates submitted for testing were collected in 2017–2021 from clinically significant infections in Europe (449 isolates) and North America (282 isolates) as part of the SENTRY Antifungal Surveillance Program. All isolates were subjected to antifungal susceptibility testing to detect emerging resistance by applying epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs), where available. Isolates with elevated MIC values (greater than the ECV) were subjected to molecular analysis to characterize any alterations in cypP51.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Organisms

A collection of 731 non-duplicate clinical isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program collected from 2017 to 2021 were included in the study. A single isolate per infection episode determined to be significant by local criteria as the reported probable cause of infection were included in this investigation. A total of 35 medical centers in North America (18 sites; 2 countries; 282 isolates) and Europe (17 sites; 11 countries; 449 isolates) sent isolates to the coordinating laboratory as part of the SENTRY Program.

Identification methods

Isolates were submitted to JMI Laboratories (North Liberty, IA, USA) where species identification was confirmed using DNA sequencing and proteomic methods (13, 25). Mold isolates were subcultured on potato dextrose agar (Remel, Inc.; Lenexa, KS, USA) to assess purity and viability. Isolates confirmed as pure were inoculated into Sabouraud Liquid Broth Modified (Becton, Dickenson and Company; Sparks, MD, USA) and the hyphae harvested and prepared for formic acid extraction. Isolates then were submitted to matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) using the MALDI Biotyper (Bruker Daltronics; Billerica, MA, USA). Isolates that did not score ≥1.8 by spectrometry were identified using sequencing of the 28S ribosomal subunit, followed by analysis of β-tubulin or internal spacer regions (ITS) (13, 18, 25, 26). Nucleotide sequences were analyzed using Lasergene software (DNASTAR; Madison, WI, USA) and compared to sequences using BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cqi).

Susceptibility testing

All isolates of A. fumigatus were submitted to antifungal susceptibility testing by BMD using CLSI M38 methodology (27). Frozen-form microdilution panels using RPMI 1640 broth supplemented with MOPS (morpholinepropane sulfonic acid buffer) and 0.2% glucose were inoculated with 0.4–5.0 × 104 CFU/mL conidial suspensions for a final concentration of 0.2–2.5 × 104 CFU/mL. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were visualized after 48 hours. MIC endpoints were read at the lowest concentration producing visually clear wells. Quality control was performed in accordance with CLSI M38 (2017) guidelines using Aspergillus flavus ATCC 204304 and A. fumigatus ATCC MYA-3626. MIC values were within the QC ranges.

Clinical breakpoints (CBPs) have been published by CLSI for A. fumigatus and voriconazole [susceptible (S), ≤0.5 mg/L; intermediate (I), 1 mg/L; resistant (R), ≥2 mg/L] and approved but not yet published for isavuconazole (S, ≤1 mg/L; I, 2 mg/L; R, ≥4 mg/L) (28). However, ECVs have been developed for A. fumigatus and isavuconazole (ECV, 1 mg/L), itraconazole (ECV, 1 mg/L), posaconazole (ECV, 0.5 mg/L), and voriconazole (ECV, 1 mg/L) (29 31). Isolates for which azole MIC results exceed the ECV were considered NWT (28, 29). The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) (32) has developed both ECVs (based on MIC distribution) and clinical breakpoints (based on MIC distributions) to reflect dosing and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters, on the one hand, and likelihood of clinical success and failure, on the other.

Characterization of mutations in the sterol 14 alpha-demethylase-encoding gene

A. fumigatus isolates displaying isavuconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, or voriconazole MIC values above the ECV (NWT) were submitted to molecular detection of cyp51A and cyp51B mutations as previously described (13). These sequences were compared to the GenBank sequences available under the accession numbers AAK73659.1 for cyp51A and AAK73660.1 for cyp51B.

RESULTS

The cumulative frequency of MIC distributions for the four mold-active azoles and A. fumigatus isolates from EU and NA is presented in Table 1. Isavuconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole displayed similar activities (MIC50/90, 1/1 mg/L, 1/1 mg/L, 0.5/0.5 mg/L, and 0.5/0.5 mg/L, respectively; Table 1) against A. fumigatus isolates from EU and NA. Greater than 90.0% of the isolates tested (EU/NA) were WT to isavuconazole (92.7/94.0% WT), itraconazole (90.9/91.8% WT), posaconazole (96.4/97.5% WT), and voriconazole (95.5/98.6% WT). The overall frequency of NWT strains of A. fumigatus (EU/NA) was 7.3/6.0% for isavuconazole, 9.1/8.2% for itraconazole, 3.6/2.5% for posaconazole, and 4.5/1.4% for voriconazole; 10.7/11.0% of EU/NA isolates were NWT to one or more triazole (Tables 1 and 2). The overall frequency of resistance (R) to isavuconazole and voriconazole was determined by application of the CLSI CBPs: R to isavuconazole was 3.1% overall [4.7/0.7% (EU/NA)] while resistance to voriconazole was 3.3% [4.5/1.4% (EU/NA)].

TABLE 1.

Antimicrobial activity of isavuconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole tested against A. fumigatus isolates from NA and EU, 2017–2021

Organism/organism group Continent (no. of isolates) No. and cumulative % of isolates inhibited at MIC (mg/L) of MIC50 MIC90
≤0.03 0.06 0.12 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 > a
Aspergillus fumigatus
Isavuconazole NA (282) 0 18 180 67 15 1 0 1 0.5 1
0 6.4 70.2 94 99.3 99.6 99.6 100
EU (449) 0 3 30 265 118 12 13 5 3 0.5 1
0 0.7 7.3 66.4 92.7 95.3 98.2 99.3 100
Itraconazole NA (282) 0 11 103 145 19 3 0 1 1 1
0 3.9 40.4 91.8 98.6 99.6 99.6 100
EU (449) 0 20 163 225 21 10 4 6 1 1
0 4.5 40.8 90.9 95.5 97.8 98.7 100
Voriconazole NA (282) 0 3 116 137 22 3 1 0.5 0.5
0 1.1 42.2 90.8 98.6 99.6 100
EU (449) 0 9 185 215 20 15 2 0 3 0.5 0.5
0 2 43.2 91.1 95.5 98.9 99.3 99.3 100
Posaconazole NA (282) 0 2 39 128 106 7 0.25 0.5
0 0.7 14.5 59.9 97.5 100
EU (449) 0 4 64 241 123 14 1 1 0.25 0.5
0 0.9 15.2 69 96.4 99.6 99.8 100
Azole-wild-type Aspergillus fumigatus
Isavuconazole NA (251) 0 18 178 55 0.5 1
0 7.2 78.1 100
EU (401) 0 3 30 260 108 0.5 1
0 0.7 8.2 73.1 100
Itraconazole NA (251) 0 11 101 139 1 1
0 4.4 44.6 100
EU (401) 0 20 161 220 1 1
0 5 45.1 100
Voriconazole NA (251) 0 3 116 119 13 0.5 0.5
0 1.2 47.4 94.8 100
EU (401) 0 9 185 196 11 0.5 0.5
0 2.2 48.4 97.3 100
Posaconazole NA (251) 0 2 39 123 84 3 0.25 0.5
0 0.8 16.3 65.3 98.8 100
EU (401) 0 4 64 232 100 1 0.25 0.5
0 1 17 74.8 99.8 100
Azole non-wild-type Aspergillus fumigatus
Isavuconazole NA (31) 0 2 12 15 1 0 1 2 2
0 6.5 45.2 93.5 96.8 96.8 100
EU (48) 0 5 10 12 13 5 3 2 8
0 10.4 31.2 56.2 83.3 93.8 100
Itraconazole NA (31) 0 2 6 19 3 0 1 2 4
0 6.5 25.8 87.1 96.8 96.8 100
EU (48) 0 2 5 21 10 4 6 2 >8
0 4.2 14.6 58.3 79.2 87.5 100
Voriconazole NA (31) 0 18 9 3 1 0.5 2
0 58.1 87.1 96.8 100
EU (48) 0 19 9 15 2 0 3 1 4
0 39.6 58.3 89.6 93.8 93.8 100
Posaconazole NA (31) 0 5 22 4 0.5 1
0 16.1 87.1 100
EU (47) 0 9 23 13 1 1 0.5 1
0 19.1 68.1 95.7 97.9 100
Azole non-wild-type with cyp51 alterations Aspergillus fumigatus
Isavuconazole NA (17) 0 1 7 8 0 0 1 2 2
0 5.9 47.1 94.1 94.1 94.1 100
EU (27) 0 1 4 2 12 5 3 4 >8
0 3.7 18.5 25.9 70.4 88.9 100
Itraconazole NA (17) 0 3 11 2 0 1 2 4
0 17.6 82.4 94.1 94.1 100
EU (27) 0 8 9 4 6 4 >8
0 29.6 63 77.8 100
Voriconazole NA (17) 0 7 7 2 1 1 2
0 41.2 82.4 94.1 100
EU (27) 0 5 3 14 2 0 3 2 >8
0 18.5 29.6 81.5 88.9 88.9 100
Posaconazole NA (17) 0 3 12 2 0.5 1
0 17.6 88.2 100
EU (27) 0 13 12 1 1 1 1
0 48.1 92.6 96.3 100
Azole non-wild-type cyp51 wild-type Aspergillus fumigatus
Isavuconazole NA (14) 0 1 5 7 1 2 2
0 7.1 42.9 92.9 100
EU (21) 0 4 6 10 1 2 2
0 19 47.6 95.2 100
Itraconazole NA (14) 0 2 3 8 1 2 2
0 14.3 35.7 92.9 100
EU (21) 0 2 5 13 1 2 2
0 9.5 33.3 95.2 100
Voriconazole NA (14) 0 11 2 1 0.5 1
0 78.6 92.9 100
EU (21) 0 14 6 1 0.5 1
0 66.7 95.2 100
Posaconazole NA (14) 0 2 10 2 0.5 1
0 14.3 85.7 100
EU (21) 0 9 10 1 0.5 0.5
0 45 95 100

TABLE 2.

Frequency of triazole NWT isolates of A. fumigatus in NA and EU, 2017–2021

Year Region (N) % NWT
ISC ITC PSC VRC ≥ 1 triazole
2017 NA (50) 4.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 6.0
EU (60) 10.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10.0
2018 NA (62) 9.7 6.5 1.6 0.0 14.5
EU (68) 16.2 14.7 7.4 7.4 20.6
2019 NA (84) 2.4 2.4 0.0 1.2 2.4
EU (103) 4.9 4.9 0.0 4.9 4.9
2020 NA (45) 4.4 17.8 4.4 2.2 17.8
EU (93) 8.6 11.8 5.4 5.4 11.8
2021 NA (41) 12.2 22.0 7.3 4.9 29.3
EU (125) 2.4 9.6 2.4 1.6 10.4
All years NA (282) 6.0 8.2 2.5 1.4 11.0
EU (449) 7.3 9.1 3.6 4.5 10.7

The mold-active azoles have been tested against isolates of A. fumigatus in the SENTRY Program since 2001. The data from 2001 to 2009 (17) and 2015 to 2017 (18) have been published previously. These data show that the percentage of isolates for which the MIC was greater than the ECV (e.g., % NWT) for itraconazole increased from 3.0% in 2001–2009 to 4.2% in 2015–2017 (data not shown), indicating a gradual increase in isolates likely to harbor an acquired resistance mechanism. Given this earlier data, it is notable that the % NWT to itraconazole in the present survey (2017–2021; EU and NA data combined) is 8.8% [9.1% (EU) and 8.2% (NA)] (Table 2).

The frequency of azole NWT strains for each of the triazoles for each year from 2017 through 2021 in EU and NA is shown in Table 2. The frequency of isolates that were NWT to at least one of the four triazoles was greater among isolates from EU for the years 2017–2019, but this shifted in the last 2 years of the survey such that the % NWT was greater among isolates from NA compared to those from EU. The % NWT when taking all years (2017–2021) into account was 11.0% for NA isolates and 10.7% for EU isolates. Whereas the % NWT for each of the triazoles tested against isolates from NA increased over time (except for 2019), this was not the case for isolates from EU. The % NWT to at least one of the triazole agents tested against isolates from NA increased steadily from 6.0% in 2017 to 29.3% in 2021, exempting 2019 (Table 2). The % NWT isolates from EU ranged from a low of 4.9% in 2019 to 20.6% in 2018 without a consistent trend up or down over the 5-year period (Table 2).

A total of 79 isolates [48 (EU) and 31 (NA)] were NWT to one or more of the triazoles tested, 44 (55.7%) of which [27 (EU; 56.3%) and 17 (NA; 54.8%)] harbored one or more alterations in the cyp51 genes (Table 3). A total of 35 isolates harbored alterations in cyp51A and 9 had alterations in cyp51B (2 isolates contained alterations in both cyp51A and cyp51B) (Table 3). Among the 44 isolates with cyp51 alterations, 31 [70.5%; 81.5/52.9% (EU/NA)] were NWT to isavuconazole, 41 [93.2%; 100.0/58.8% (EU/NA)] were NWT to itraconazole, 16 [36.4%; 51.9/11.8% (EU/NA)] were NWT to posaconazole, and 22 [50.0%; 70.4/17.6% (EU/NA)] were NWT to voriconazole (Table 3). cyp51 alterations were similarly detected among A. fumigatus isolates from NA (17/282; 6.0%) and EU (27/449; 6.0%).

TABLE 3.

Summary of CYP51 alterations detected among non-wild-type Aspergillus fumigatus isolates a

State and/or country Organism No. of isolates MIC range (mg/L) Amino acid alterations
ISC ITR VRC PSC cyp51A cyp51B
VT, USA Aspergillus fumigatus 1 2 1 0.5 0.25 A9T Wild type
Czech Republic Aspergillus fumigatus 1 1 2 0.5 0.5 D172V Wild type
Czech Republic Aspergillus fumigatus 2 1 2 0.5 0.5 F46Y, D172V, E427K Wild type
VT, USA Aspergillus fumigatus 1 2 2 1 0.5 F46Y, M172V, E427K Wild type
Czech Republic Aspergillus fumigatus 1 2 2 1 0.5 F46Y, M172V, N248T, D255E, E427K Wild type
VT, USA Aspergillus fumigatus 1 1 2 0.5 0.5 F46Y, M172V, N248T, D255E, E427K Wild type
VA, USA Aspergillus fumigatus 1 >8 >8 4 0.5 G448S Wild type
France Aspergillus fumigatus 1 >8 >8 >8 2 H147Y Wild type
AL, USA Aspergillus fumigatus 1 1 2 0.5 0.25 I242V Wild type
Canada Aspergillus fumigatus 1 1 2 0.5 0.5 I242V Wild type
IN, USA Aspergillus fumigatus 1 1 2 1 1 I242V Wild type
VA, USA Aspergillus fumigatus 2 1 2 0.5 0.5 I242V Wild type
IN, USA Aspergillus fumigatus 2 1–2 1–4 1 0.5 I242V Q42L, S501Q
France Aspergillus fumigatus 1 0.5 2 0.5 0.5 K67Q Wild type
MI, USA Aspergillus fumigatus 1 2 2 2 1 K67Q Wild type
Belgium Aspergillus fumigatus 1 4 4 2 1 L98H,TR34 Wild type
Czech Republic Aspergillus fumigatus 1 4 >8 2 1 L98H,TR34 Wild type
Germany Aspergillus fumigatus 1 8 >8 4 1 L98H,TR34 Wild type
Italy Aspergillus fumigatus 10 2–> 8 2–> 8 1–> 8 0.5–4 L98H,TR34 Wild type
Slovenia Aspergillus fumigatus 1 4 >8 2 0.5 L98H,TR34 Wild type
UK Aspergillus fumigatus 4 4–8 4–> 8 2 0.5–1 L98H,TR34 Wild type
France Aspergillus fumigatus 1 1 2 0.5 0.5 Wild type F149V
France Aspergillus fumigatus 1 4 4 1 1 Wild type Q42L
NJ, USA Aspergillus fumigatus 5 0.5–2 1–4 0.5–2 0.25–0.5 Wild type Q42L
Belgium Aspergillus fumigatus 1 >8 8 >8 0.5 Y121F, M172I, T289A,
G448S, TR46
Wild type
a

ISC, isavuconazole; ITR, itraconazole; VRC, voriconazole; PSC, posaconazole.

The most frequent alteration was cyp51A TR34/L98H, carried by 18 isolates from EU (10 from Italy, 4 from the UK, and 1 each from Belgium, Czech Republic, Slovenia, and Germany), all of which were NWT to isavuconazole and itraconazole, 17 were NWT to voriconazole (and resistant applying the CLSI CBPs), and 12 were NWT to posaconazole (Table 3). A single isolate from Belgium harbored the environmental TR46 along alterations Y121F, M172I, T289A, and G448 and was NWT to isavuconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole (Table 3). None of the isolates from NA harbored the TR34 or TR46 alterations. Single substitutions in cyp51A were detected in 10 of 17 isolates from North America, 7 of which carried the alteration I242V (all WT to voriconazole, 6 of 7 WT to itraconazole, isavuconazole, and posaconazole) (Table 3). One NA isolate carried the cyp51A alteration G448S (NWT to isavuconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole), one carried K67Q (NWT to all four triazoles), and one carried A9T (NWT to isavuconazole). Single substitutions were seen in 5 of 28 isolates from EU (3 in cyp51A and 2 in cyp51B): Q42L (cyp51B; NWT to isavuconazole, itraconazole, and posaconazole), K67Q (NWT to itraconazole), H147Y (NWT to all 4 triazoles), F149V (CYP51B; NWT to itraconazole), and D172V (NWT to itraconazole) (Table 3).

A series of three (F46Y, M172V, E427K) or five (F46Y, M172V, N248T, D255E, E427K) alterations on cyp51A were detected in three (two from EU and one from NA) and two (one from EU and one from NA) isolates, respectively. All three of the isolates with F46Y, M172V, and E427K substitutions were NWT to itraconazole, and one was NWT to isavuconazole and itraconazole (Table 3). Both isolates with the substitutions F46Y, M172V, N248T, D255E, and E427K were NWT to itraconazole, and one was also NWT to isavuconazole.

Alterations in cyp51B were noted in nine isolates; six of nine carried Q42L, five from NA (four NWT to itraconazole, four NWT to isavuconazole, and one NWT to posaconazole) and one from EU (NWT to isavuconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole). The remaining three isolates included one isolate from France with a F149V substitution (NWT to itraconazole) and two isolates from NA with cyp51B Q42L coupled with a cyp51A I242V alteration (one isolate NWT to itraconazole and one NWT to isavuconazole) (Table 3).

This collection of 731 isolates of A. fumigatus contained 652 isolates (89.2%) that were WT to all 4 azoles, 35 isolates (4.8%) that were NWT to one or more azole but showed no alterations in cyp51A or cyp51B and 44 isolates (6.0%) that were NWT to one or more azole and harbored alterations in cyp51 (Table 1). Among the 35 NWT isolates without cyp51 alterations, 45.7% were WT to isavuconazole, 34.3% were WT to itraconazole, 91.2% were WT to posaconazole, and 94.3% were WT to voriconazole. By comparison, among the 44 NWT isolates with cyp51 alterations, 29.5% were WT to isavuconazole, 6.8% were WT to itraconazole, 63.6% were WT to posaconazole, and 50.0% were WT to voriconazole.

DISCUSSION

Aspergillus fumigatus is an opportunistic fungal pathogen that is the major cause of IA as well as several different environmentally acquired respiratory infections (33). Triazole-resistant A. fumigatus is a serious threat to human health and has been detected on six continents and in several different environments throughout the world (8, 34 36). The frequency of triazole-resistant A. fumigatus as a cause of IA has been increasing over the past two decades, most notably in EU and NA (3, 5 8, 20). Resistance rates as high as 26% have been reported in an intensive care unit (ICU) in the Netherlands (37). Despite the detection of triazole-resistant A. fumigatus throughout the world, most clinical laboratories do not perform AFST of filamentous fungi (1, 11, 38 41). In addition, the low rate of Aspergillus recovery might also play a role in the lack of susceptibility data, and, as such, the frequency of triazole resistance can be largely underestimated.

Thus far, MOR documented for the triazoles and A. fumigatus has been limited to alterations in cyp51 (3, 8, 11, 12). Whereas triazole-resistant A. fumigatus in EU has been shown to involve single point mutations in cyp51A (e.g., G54W, M220T), the environmental mutations TR34 and TR46 are the most common alterations found in both clinical and environmental samples (3, 8, 11, 12). Isolates of A. fumigatus with these environmental fungicide-associated MOR are especially concerning as they are often resistant/NWT to all 4 triazoles and cause infections in azole-naïve patients (3, 11). In the USA, there has been little study of the association between agricultural triazole fungicide use and human infections (23, 42). Together with comparatively low rates of resistance in clinical isolates (17, 18, 20 22), limited surveys in the USA have determined that the most frequent alterations in cyp51A were SNPs M220I and I242V (21, 23). The TR-based MOR in US patient isolates has been identified in four isolates (two with TR34 and two with TR46) from as early as 2008 along with an additional six isolates (five with TR34 and one with TR46) detected through 2018 (21, 23, 42). Most recently, a fatal environmental fungicide-associated triazole-resistant isolate of A. fumigatus (TR34) was reported in a patient from Pennsylvania (24). Given the lack of standardized surveillance and limited clinical testing, it is likely that these isolates reflect only a small proportion of resistant infections (3, 21).

Although triazoles are the most frequently employed antifungal agents in the USA (42, 43), it is notable that triazole use in US hospitals declined by 21% (mostly fluconazole) during 2006–2012 (42, 43), whereas the agricultural use of triazole-type fungicides increased by fourfold in recent (2006–2016) years (42). Given the experience in EU, it is reasonable to assume that this experience can select for A. fumigatus strains harbouring an environmental-associated cyp51A gene mutation such as TR34 or TR46. The SENTRY Antifungal Surveillance Program has monitored infections due to A. fumigatus since 2001 and has performed DNA sequence analysis of cyp51 since 2015. Over this time, environmental alterations have been detected in isolates from EU but not from NA (13, 15 19).

There are several findings from this survey that are notable: (i) the vast majority of isolates tested (89.2%) expressed a WT azole phenotype that was similar in isolates from both EU (89.3%) and NA (89.0%) (Table 2); (ii) as in previous surveys (13, 15 19), the % NWT for each of the triazoles was greater for isolates from EU versus NA for the years 2017–2019, but this was reversed for years 2020–2021 (Table 2); (iii) as noted in previous studies, alterations in cyp51 were detected in 55.7% of triazole NWT isolates (56.3% in EU and 54.8% in NA); and (iv) there was a consistent trend of increasing % NWT for isolates from NA with a high of 29.3% NWT to ≥1 triazole in 2021 (Table 2). The highest % NWT among isolates from EU was 20.6% in 2018, but there was no consistent trend over time (Table 2); (v) the overall NWT percentage was 11.0% in isolates from NA and 10.7% in isolates from EU (Table 2); and (vi) the environmental alterations, TR34 and TR46, were only detected in isolates from EU despite a comparable frequency of azole NWT isolates in both EU and NA. This observation suggests that different non-environmental exposures account for the emerging resistance observed in isolates from NA. The rate of resistance/NWT was >10% in 3 of 5 study years for NA and in 4 of 5 years for EU. AFST is encouraged in the setting of 5% or greater resistant/NWT isolates, and triazole monotherapy is discouraged when rates of resistance exceed 10% (3). All studies to date indicate that azole resistance is associated with the therapeutic failure of this class of agents for the treatment of IA.

These results show for the first time in the SENTRY Antifungal Surveillance Program that the triazole NWT percentage for isolates from NA exceeded that of isolates from EU (17, 18). In contrast to the isolates from EU, the NWT isolates from NA did not possess any of the environmental alterations TR34/L98H or TR46/Y121F/T289A (Table 3). As such, it would appear that the resistant/NWT strains in NA are the result of drug pressure in the healthcare milieu rather than exposure of A. fumigatus to azole-type fungicides in the environment, despite decreased use of this class of agents in US hospitals. Unfortunately, we have no information concerning azole exposure of patients in this survey, and very little data exist to document the presence of azole-resistant A. fumigatus from the environment as has been recorded elsewhere in the world (42).

There are some limitations in this SENTRY Surveillance Program survey that must be acknowledged. First, we neither collect clinical outcome data nor do we identify those individuals who received an antifungal agent. As such, we are unable to establish any clinical correlation between MIC values and clinical outcomes. Second, we did not identify any mechanisms of resistance beyond alterations in cyp51A/B (e.g., HapE, Hmg1, SrbA). There were several isolates of A. fumigatus that were NWT to an azole but did not possess specific alterations in cyp51. The potential for an efflux mechanism accounting for elevated MIC values was not evaluated. Finally, the SENTRY Program is a sentinel surveillance and does not represent population-based surveillance.

In summary, the data presented in the present study expand upon the azole MIC distributions for A. fumigatus. We note that the frequency of azole NWT strains of A. fumigatus has increased since the survey conducted in 2001–2009 and now approaches 10% overall, a level at which the use of azole monotherapy is questionable (3). Importantly, only approximately half of the azole NWT isolates displayed alteration in the CYP51 sequences. Therefore, other potential mechanisms of resistance not evaluated in this study could play an significant role in A. fumigatus. The azole NWT isolates harbored alterations in cyp51 that included environmental alterations (e.g., TR34/L98H) in isolates from EU and non-synonymous point mutations in isolates from NA. Antifungal resistance among isolates of A. fumigatus appears to be increasing in NA and remains stable in EU. State-of-the-art methods for species identification and antifungal susceptibility testing will be important to further define the impact of azole resistance in both local and regional settings.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was performed by JMI Laboratories and supported by Pfizer, which included funding for services related to preparing this manuscript.

JMI Laboratories was contracted to perform services in 2022 for AbbVie, Inc.; AimMax Therapeutics; Amicrobe, Inc.; Appili Therapeutics; Armata Pharmaceuticals; Astellas Pharma, Inc.; Basilea Pharmaceutica AG; Becton, Dickinson and Company; bioMérieux; Biosergen AB; Bugworks; Cerba Research NV; Cidara Therapeutics; Cipla USA Inc.; ContraFect Corporation; CorMedix Inc.; Crestone, Inc.; Curza Global, LLC; Diamond V; Discuva Ltd.; Entasis Therapeutics; Enveda Biosciences; Evopoint Biosciences; Fedora Pharmaceuticals; Fox Chase Chemical Diversity Center; Genentech; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; GSK plc; Institute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics; Iterum Therapeutics plc; Janssen Biopharma; Johnson & Johnson; Kaleido Biosciences; LifeMine Therapeutics; Medpace, Inc.; Lysovant Sciences, Inc.; Meiji Seika Pharma; Melinta Therapeutics; Menarini Group; Merck & Co.; MicuRx Pharmaceutical Inc.; Mundipharma International Ltd.; Mutabilis; Nabriva Therapeutics; National Cancer Institute; National Institutes of Health; Ohio State University; Omnix Medical Ltd.; Paratek Pharmaceuticals; Pfizer; PolyPid Ltd.; PPD; Prokaryotics, Inc.; Pulmocide Ltd; Qpex Biopharma; Revagenix; Roche Holding AG; Roivant Sciences; Scynexis, Inc.; SeLux Diagnostics; Shionogi & Co., Ltd.; Sinovent Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Spero Therapeutics; Sumitovant Biopharma, Inc.; TenNor Therapeutics; Thermo Fisher Scientific; US Food and Drug Administration; VenatoRx Pharmaceuticals; Washington University; Watershed Medical, LLC; Wockhardt; and Zoetis, Inc.

Contributor Information

C. G. Carvalhaes, Email: cicacarvalhaes@gmail.com.

Kimberly E. Hanson, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

REFERENCES

  • 1. Walker TA, Lockhart SR, Beekmann SE, Polgreen PM, Santibanez S, Mody RK, Beer KD, Chiller TM, Jackson BR. 2018. Recognition of azole-resistant aspergillosis by physicians specializing in infectious diseases, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 24:111–113. doi: 10.3201/eid2401.170971 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Patterson TF, Thompson GR, Denning DW, Fishman JA, Hadley S, Herbrecht R, Kontoyiannis DP, Marr KA, Morrison VA, Nguyen MH, Segal BH, Steinbach WJ, Stevens DA, Walsh TJ, Wingard JR, Young J-A, Bennett JE. 2016. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of aspergillosis: 2016 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis 63:433–442. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Wiederhold NP, Verweij PE. 2020. Aspergillus fumigatus and pan-azole resistance: who should be concerned? Curr Opin Infect Dis 33:290–297. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000662 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Lewis JS, Wiederhold NP, Hakki M, Thompson GR. 2022. New perspectives on antimicrobial agents: isavuconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 66:e0017722. doi: 10.1128/aac.00177-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Bongomin F, Gago S, Oladele RO, Denning DW. 2017. Global and multi-national prevalence of fungal diseases-estimate precision. J Fungi (Basel) 3:57. doi: 10.3390/jof3040057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Fisher MC, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Berman J, Bicanic T, Bignell EM, Bowyer P, Bromley M, Brüggemann R, Garber G, Cornely OA, Gurr SJ, Harrison TS, Kuijper E, Rhodes J, Sheppard DC, Warris A, White PL, Xu J, Zwaan B, Verweij PE. 2022. Tackling the emerging threat of antifungal resistance to human health. Nat Rev Microbiol 20:557–571. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00720-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Gow NAR, Johnson C, Berman J, Coste AT, Cuomo CA, Perlin DS, Bicanic T, Harrison TS, Wiederhold N, Bromley M, Chiller T, Edgar K. 2022. The importance of antimicrobial resistance in medical mycology. Nat Commun 13:5352. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32249-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Rivero-Menendez O, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Mellado E, Cuenca-Estrella M. 2016. Triazole resistance in Aspergillus spp: a worldwide problem? J Fungi (Basel) 2:21. doi: 10.3390/jof2030021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Camps SMT, van der Linden JWM, Li Y, Kuijper EJ, van Dissel JT, Verweij PE, Melchers WJG. 2012. Rapid induction of multiple resistance mechanisms in Aspergillus fumigatus during azole therapy: a case study and review of the literature. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:10–16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05088-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Howard SJ, Pasqualotto AC, Anderson MJ, Leatherbarrow H, Albarrag AM, Harrison E, Gregson L, Bowyer P, Denning DW. 2013. Major variations in Aspergillus fumigatus arising within aspergillomas in chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. Mycoses 56:434–441. doi: 10.1111/myc.12047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Rogers TR, Verweij PE, Castanheira M, Dannaoui E, White PL, Arendrup MC. 2022. Molecular mechanisms of acquired antifungal drug resistance in principal fungal pathogens and EUCAST guidance for their laboratory detection and clinical implications. J Antimicrob Chemother 77:2053–2073. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Chowdhary A, Sharma C, Meis JF. 2017. Azole-resistant aspergillosis: epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, and treatment. J Infect Dis 216:S436–S444. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Castanheira M, Collingsworth TD, Davis AP, Deshpande LM, Pfaller MA. 2021. Isavuconazole nonwildtype Aspergillus fumigatus isolates from a global surveillance study display alterations in multiple genes involved in the ergosterol biosynthesis pathway not previously associated with resistance to other azoles. Mycoses 64:1279–1290. doi: 10.1111/myc.13267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Warris A, Lehrnbecher T, Roilides E, Castagnola E, Brüggemann RJM, Groll AH. 2019. ESCMID-ECMM guideline: diagnosis and management of invasive aspergillosis in neonates and children. Clin Microbiol Infect 25:1096–1113. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.05.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Carvalhaes CG, Rhomberg PR, Pfaller M, Castanheira M. 2021. Comparative activity of posaconazole and systemic azole agents against clinical isolates of filamentous fungi from a global surveillance programme. JAC Antimicrob Resist 3:dlab088. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlab088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Messer SA, Carvalhaes CG, Castanheira M, Pfaller MA. 2020. In vitro activity of isavuconazole versus opportunistic filamentous fungal pathogens from the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program, 2017-2018. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 97:115007. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Pfaller M, Boyken L, Hollis R, Kroeger J, Messer S, Tendolkar S, Diekema D. 2011. Use of epidemiological cutoff values to examine 9-year trends in susceptibility of Aspergillus species to the triazoles. J Clin Microbiol 49:586–590. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02136-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Pfaller MA, Rhomberg PR, Wiederhold NP, Gibas C, Sanders C, Fan H, Mele J, Kovanda LL, Castanheira M. 2018. In vitro activity of isavuconazole against opportunistic fungal pathogens from two mycology reference laboratories. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:62. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01230-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Pfaller MA, Carvalhaes CG, Messer SA, Rhomberg PR, Castanheira M. 2021. In vitro activity of posaconazole and comparators versus opportunistic filamentous fungal pathogens globally collected during 8 years. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 101:115473. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115473 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Badali H, Cañete-Gibas C, McCarthy D, Patterson H, Sanders C, David MP, Mele J, Fan H, Wiederhold NP. 2022. Species distribution and antifungal susceptibilities of Aspergillus section fumigati isolates in clinical samples from the United States. J Clin Microbiol 60:e0028022. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00280-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Berkow EL, Nunnally NS, Bandea A, Kuykendall R, Beer K, Lockhart SR. 2018. Detection of TR34/L98H cyp51A mutation through passive surveillance for azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus in the United States from 2015 to 2017. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e02240-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02240-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Pham CD, Reiss E, Hagen F, Meis JF, Lockhart SR. 2014. Passive surveillance for azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus, United States, 2011-2013. Emerg Infect Dis 20:1498–1503. doi: 10.3201/eid2009.140142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Beer KD, Farnon EC, Jain S, Jamerson C, Lineberger S, Miller J, Berkow EL, Lockhart SR, Chiller T, Jackson BR. 2018. Multidrug-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus carrying mutations linked to environmental fungicide exposure - three states, 2010-2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 67:1064–1067. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6738a5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Pfaller MA, Carvalhaes CG, Deshpande LM, Rhomberg PR, Castanheira M. 2023. In vitro activity of isavuconazole and other mould-active azoles against Aspergillus fumigatus with and without cyp51 alterations. J Fungi (Basel) 9:608. doi: 10.3390/jof9060608 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Pfaller MA, Woosley LN, Messer SA, Jones RN, Castanheira M. 2012. Significance of molecular identification and antifungal susceptibility of clinically significant yeasts and moulds in a global antifungal surveillance programme. Mycopathologia 174:259–271. doi: 10.1007/s11046-012-9551-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Pfaller MA, Rhomberg PR, Messer SA, Jones RN, Castanheira M. 2015. Isavuconazole, micafungin, and 8 comparator antifungal agents' susceptibility profiles for common and uncommon opportunistic fungi collected in 2013: temporal analysis of antifungal drug resistance using CLSI species-specific clinical breakpoints and proposed epidemiological cutoff values. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 82:303–313. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibilty testing of filamentous fungi. 2017. In CLSI, M38 document [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Performance standards for antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi. 2022. In CLSI, M38M51S document [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Epidemiological cutoff values for antifungal susceptibility testing. 2022. In CLSI, M57S document [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Espinel-Ingroff A, Chowdhary A, Gonzalez GM, Lass-Flörl C, Martin-Mazuelos E, Meis J, Peláez T, Pfaller MA, Turnidge J. 2013. Multicenter study of isavuconazole MIC distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for Aspergillus spp. for the CLSI M38-A2 broth microdilution method. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:3823–3828. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00636-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Espinel-Ingroff A, Diekema DJ, Fothergill A, Johnson E, Pelaez T, Pfaller MA, Rinaldi MG, Canton E, Turnidge J. 2010. Wild-type MIC distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for the triazoles and six Aspergillus spp. for the CLSI broth microdilution method (M38-A2 document). J Clin Microbiol 48:3251–3257. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00536-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. EUCAST . 2019. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs for antifungal agents. Available from: http://www.eucast.org/astoffungi/clinicalbreakpointsforantifungals
  • 33. Thornton CR. 2020. “Detection of the 'big five' mold killers of humans: Aspergillus, Fusarium, Lomentospora, Scedosporium and mucormycetes”. Adv Appl Microbiol 110:1–61. doi: 10.1016/bs.aambs.2019.10.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Berger S, El Chazli Y, Babu AF, Coste AT. 2017. Azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: a consequence of antifungal use in agriculture? Front Microbiol 8:1024. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Burks C, Darby A, Gómez Londoño L, Momany M, Brewer MT. 2021. Azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus in the environment: identifying key reservoirs and hotspots of antifungal resistance. PLoS Pathog 17:e1009711. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009711 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Verweij PE, Arendrup MC, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Gold JAW, Lockhart SR, Chiller T, White PL. 2022. Dual use of antifungals in medicine and agriculture: how do we help prevent resistance developing in human pathogens. Drug Resist Updat 65:100885. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2022.100885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Russcher A. 2014. High azole resistance rate of Aspergillus fumigatus at intensive care unit in a Dutch tertiary hospital. Ned Tijdschr Med Microbiol:22:S121. [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Buil JB, Hagen F, Chowdhary A, Verweij PE, Meis JF. 2018. Itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole CLSI MIC distributions for wild-type and azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus isolates. J Fungi (Basel) 4:103. doi: 10.3390/jof4030103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Lamoth F, Lewis RE, Kontoyiannis DP. 2020. Role and interpretation of antifungal susceptibility testing for the management of invasive fungal infections. J Fungi (Basel) 7:17. doi: 10.3390/jof7010017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Schelenz S, Owens K, Guy R, Rautemaa-Richardson R, Manuel RJ, Richardson M, Moore C, Enoch DA, Micallef C, Howard P, Agrawal SG, Johnson EM, Muller-Pebody B. 2019. National mycology laboratory diagnostic capacity for invasive fungal diseases in 2017: evidence of sub-optimal practice. J Infect 79:167–173. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2019.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Vallabhaneni S, Sapiano M, Weiner LM, Lockhart SR, Magill S. 2017. Antifungal susceptibility testing practices at acute care hospitals enrolled in the national healthcare safety network, United States 2011-2015. Open Forum Infect Dis 4:ofx175. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofx175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Toda M, Beer KD, Kuivila KM, Chiller TM, Jackson BR. 2021. Trends in agricultural triazole fungicide use in the United States, 1992-2016 and possible implications for antifungal-resistant fungi in human disease. Environ Health Perspect 129:55001. doi: 10.1289/EHP7484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Vallabhaneni S, Baggs J, Tsay S, Srinivasan AR, Jernigan JA, Jackson BR. 2018. Trends in antifungal use in US hospitals, 2006-12. J Antimicrob Chemother 73:2867–2875. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky270 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES