Abstract
Morphogenesis and cell state transitions must be coordinated in time and space to produce a functional tissue. An excellent paradigm to understand the coupling of these processes is mammalian hair follicle development, which is initiated by the formation of an epithelial invagination—termed placode—that coincides with the emergence of a designated hair follicle stem cell population. The mechanisms directing the deformation of the epithelium, cell state transitions and physical compartmentalization of the placode are unknown. Here we identify a key role for coordinated mechanical forces stemming from contractile, proliferative and proteolytic activities across the epithelial and mesenchymal compartments in generating the placode structure. A ring of fibroblast cells gradually wraps around the placode cells to generate centripetal contractile forces, which, in collaboration with polarized epithelial myosin activity, promote elongation and local tissue thickening. These mechanical stresses further enhance compartmentalization of Sox9 expression to promote stem cell positioning. Subsequently, proteolytic remodelling locally softens the basement membrane to facilitate a release of pressure on the placode, enabling localized cell divisions, tissue fluidification and epithelial invagination into the underlying mesenchyme. Together, our experiments and modelling identify dynamic cell shape transformations and tissue-scale mechanical cooperation as key factors for orchestrating organ formation.
Subject terms: Developmental biology, Cell biology
Villeneuve et al. report coordination of contractile forces during mammalian hair follicle development, with actomyosin contractility and mechanical forces from the epidermis and underlying tissue regulating placode invagination and Sox9 expression.
Main
The structure of tissues is tightly linked to their function. During the formation of functional organs, large-scale changes in tissue elongation, stretching, compression, folding/buckling and budding impact the shape, position, packing and contractility state of cells. Conversely, changes in single-cell contractility, shape and position locally alter tissue organization and mechanics. Importantly, these tissue and cell-scale transformations need to be tightly coordinated in space and time with the acquisition of specialized cell states through mechanisms that are poorly understood1,2. The formation of the mammalian placode, a lens-shaped multilayered epithelial thickening that gives rise to the hair follicle, serves as an ideal model to study how cell state transitions and morphogenesis are coordinated to generate a specialized tissue structure.
In the mouse embryo, a first wave of the periodically spaced pattern of the hair follicle placode arises at late embryonic day 13 (E13) from a homogeneous epithelial sheet adhering to a basement membrane that overlays the dermis, a connective tissue containing dispersed mesenchymal cells. This is followed by a second and third wave of morphogenesis around E15.5 and E18, respectively, producing hair-follicle placodes that are morphologically identical and regularly interspersed with the first-wave follicle3,4. One of the key pathways regulating placode specification is Wnt signalling, which acts in a bidirectional, paracrine manner between the epidermis and the underlying dermis. This process commences at E12.5, when secreted epidermal Wnt activates broad mesenchymal β-catenin signalling to initiate the specification of the fibroblast population that later becomes the dermal condensate, an essential structure for hair follicle formation5. These fibroblasts, through an unknown signal, then induce hair follicle progenitor fate in the epidermis in patterned pre-placodes molecularly identified by Dkk4, Edar and Fgf20 expression6–9. Subsequently, progenitor cell rearrangement and compaction demarcate the physically identifiable placode (Fig. 1a). At the same time, mesenchymal cells migrate and cluster to form a dermal condensate directly underneath the placode10–12. Once this spatial pattern has been defined, progenitor cells specify to become follicle cells and activate the expression of additional genes to drive their development into the mature hair follicle, which harbours a set of adult stem cells responsible for constant self-renewal of the hair follicle throughout life. One of these genes is Sox9, the master transcription factor required for adult hair follicle stem cells, which initially exhibits broader expression but becomes restricted to the placode between E14 and E15, defining the transcriptional profile of future hair follicle stem cells13,14. The placodes—organized into concentric rings of stem and progenitor cell populations—subsequently grow out as longitudinally aligned cylindrical compartments to form the hair follicle13. However, the physical mechanisms driving the establishment of a Sox9-positive stem cell population, coordinated with stereotypical morphological changes leading to placode invagination are still poorly understood.
Fig. 1. Placode cells undergo isotropic elongation and subsequent basal surface expansion.
a, Schematic representation of the skin and the morphological parameters quantified. b, Phalloidin and Edar-stained sagittal cross-sections of mouse epidermis at E13.5–15-5. Scale bars, 20 μm. Images are representative of three mice per group. c, Quantification of cell axis lengths from E13.5 placode (marked by Fgf20 expression) and epidermis from the images in b. No substantial differences in cell morphology between placode and epidermis are observed (n = 57 cells pooled across 11 placodes/surrounding epidermis from three mice; two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)/Tukey’s). d, Quantification of cell axis lengths from E13.5–15.5 placode basal cells. Note the increased height and reduced apical and basal cell surface lengths in E14.5 and E15.5 placodes, and the increased basal surface length at E15.5 (n = 57 (E13.5), 74 (E14.5) and 77 (E15.5) cells pooled across three mice per timepoint; two-way ANOVA/Tukey’s). e, Quantification of the basal/apical cell surface ratio in E13.5–15.5 placodes. Note the increased basal surface ratio at E15.5 (n = 11 (E13.5), 9 (E14.5) or 8 (E15.5) placodes pooled across three mice; Kruskal–Wallis/Dunn’s). f,g, Quantification and representative images of 3D rendering of cell volumes and shapes from E14.5 placode and epidermis. Note the volume-preserving elongation of the placode cells. Scale bars, 5 μm (n = 392 (Epidermis) and 387 (Placode) cells pooled across three mice; P = 0.7 Mann–Whitney). Minimum-to-maximum box plots show 75th, 50th and 25th percentiles. NS, not significant.
In this Article we use the murine hair follicle placode as a paradigm to construct and genetically validate a biomechanical model for epithelial sheet transformation into a placode bud. Using whole-embryo live imaging, mechanical measurements, genetic manipulations and three-dimensional (3D) vertex modelling, we show that a combination of epithelial cell-intrinsic actomyosin contractility and extrinsic mechanical stresses from the underlying mesenchyme are required for placode thickening. Importantly, mechanical stress also contributes to enhancement and spatial restriction of Sox9 expression, coupling morphogenetic dynamics to cell type specification and tissue compartmentalization. Subsequent remodelling of the basement membrane facilitates a release of accumulated pressure within the placodes to induce the localized cell divisions necessary for placode budding. Collectively, this study identifies a critical role for coordinated tissue- and cell-scale forces across cell compartments in mammalian organogenesis.
Results
Placode cells undergo elongation and basal surface expansion
Hair follicle placode formation is initiated by epidermal cell rearrangement and compaction to form a physically identifiable thickened structure10,15. To investigate morphological changes that generate this specific epithelial deformation, we performed whole mount imaging of mouse epidermis and quantified the cell shapes of the basal layer by segmenting confocal z-stacks starting at E13.5. We first measured the basal cell size in three dimensions (Fig. 1a) using antibodies against Edar as well as Fgf20-β-galactosidase knock-in allele embryos (Fgf20βGal), which report the expression of Fgf20; both of these are among the earliest known marker genes of placode cells7. Analysis of morphological features revealed that at E13.5, Edarhi and Fgf20βGal-positive cells were still cuboidal in shape and morphologically indistinguishable from other basal cells (Fig. 1b,c and Extended Data Fig. 1a–c). We also compared cell elongation in the x–y plane, the nematic order of elongation, as well as the numbers of neighbouring cells within Fgf20βGal-positive cells and the surrounding epidermis, but these tissue-scale measurements also revealed no specific morphological differences between Fgf20βGal-positive cell clusters and their neighbours (Extended Data Fig. 1a–c), indicating that placode cell fate specification precedes any substantial cell shape or tissue mechanical changes.
Extended Data Fig. 1. Early cell fate specification precedes morphological changes.
(a, b) Representative images of E13.5 - E15.5 cell cortexes and FGF20-expressing (β-gal-stained) placode cells from sagittal (a) and planar panels (b, left panels). Cell area, neighbor count, nematic order and cell elongation (in x-y) were quantified. Scale bars 50 μm. Images representative of 3 mice/group. (c) Quantification of morphological parameters from images in (b). No substantial differences in cell morphology between placode and epidermis are observed at E13.5 (n = 2635 (E13.5 EPI); 54 (E13.5 PLAC); 2657 (E14.5 EPI); 493 (E14 PLAC); 2982 (E15.5 EPI) and 422 (E15.5 PLAC) cells pooled across 3 mice /group). Minimum-to-maximum box plots show the 75th, 50th, 25th percentiles.
In stark contrast, the next embryonic day (E14.5) revealed a clearly distinguishable placode characterized by a decrease in the cross-sectional area and a corresponding elongation of the longitudinal (lateral) axis of the basal cells (Fig. 1b,d). Interestingly, both apical and basal surfaces of the basal epidermal cells showed a proportional decrease from their length at E13.5, indicating that the elongation was not achieved through apical or basal constriction (Fig. 1b–e and Extended Data Fig. 1a,b). Furthermore, 3D segmentation revealed that the elongation initiated between E13.5 and E14.5 occurred without an alteration in cell volume. This analysis also confirmed that the placode cells displayed cylindrical shapes with comparable apical and basal surface areas (Fig. 1f,g). At E15.5, the placode cells continued to further elongate (Fig. 1b,d). In addition, while the apical surface length remained comparable to that of E14.5 cells, the basal surface expanded (Fig. 1d,e), resulting in a conical shape of E15.5 placode cells. Collectively, these data indicate that the initial placode cell fate determination precedes morphological changes. The subsequent morphological changes are initiated by a volume-preserving elongation of basal cells along the longitudinal axis at E14.5, followed by expansion of the basal surface of the basal cells at E15.5.
Cycles of deformation drive tissue elongation
To understand the mechanics of the two-step morphological transformation, we investigated cell- and tissue-scale forces that could act on the placode cells. For this we performed live imaging of intact mouse embryos with genetically labelled plasma membrane-targeted Tomato (R26RmT/mG; ref. 16). Visual inspection and particle image velocimetry (PIV) of live tissue dynamics to quantify cell movements indicated that cells within the E14.5 placodes displayed coordinated, collective centripetal fluctuations, as well as rotational tissue flows around the placode, as has been observed previously in skin explants15 (Fig. 2a,b and Supplementary Video 1). Interestingly, the flows were no longer detected at E15.5, whereas the fluctuations continued and displayed overall negative divergence in the plane of the basal layer, indicative of tissue flows out of the basal cell layer plane (Fig. 2a,b and Supplementary Video 2). Indeed, examining tissue flows in 3D revealed in-plane contractions positioned at the placode neck, extensile tissue flows downwards to the dermis, and deformation of junctions, resulting in plastic deformation of the placode structure and net downward tissue elongation (Fig. 2c, Supplementary Video 3 and Extended Data Fig. 2a,b). To understand the forces that could generate these patterns of tissue deformation, we measured mechanical stresses around and within the E14.5 placode, as well as within the epidermis, using laser ablation17. Quantification of recoil and its radial displacement at the placode–epidermis boundary showed that recoil away from the cut occurred on both sides, confirming that this boundary was under tensile strain. Similar recoil magnitudes were detected within the epidermis (Extended Data Fig. 2c–e and Supplementary Video 4). In contrast, tension inside the placode itself was low (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Video 5).
Fig. 2. In-plane oscillatory deformation drives tissue elongation.
a, Live imaging snapshots of basal epidermis (left; dashed circles indicate placodes) analysed by PIV (middle) to extract flow vector mean divergence (right). Note the localized tissue flows at E14.5 and E15.5 and negative divergence at E15.5 (n = 4 mice per stage). b, Quantification of mean divergence over time (n = 3 (E14.5) and 4 (E15.5) mice per stage; mean ± s.e.m.). c, Snapshots (left), corresponding PIV (middle) and strain rates (right) of optical cross-sections from E15.5 3D time-lapse images. Note the progressive constriction of the placode neck and downward flow of tissue. d, Live imaging snapshots with regions of laser ablation highlighted (circles) and vectors showing the recoil magnitude and direction after ablation (arrows). The quantification of mean displacement over time shows larger displacements in the epidermis, indicative of lower tension inside the placode (n = 6 mice; Wilcoxon test). e, pMLC2, DAPI and Keratin-10-stained skin cross-sections at E14.5. The dashed line marks the boundary between epidermis and dermis. f,g, Quantifications of pMLC2 intensity (f) and the apical/basal pMLC2 intensity ratio (g) at E14.5. Note the low pMLC2 within the placode and high pMLC2 on the apical/suprabasal surfaces (n = 12 placodes from three mice; Student’s test). GV, gray values. h, Top-view dermis whole mount at E14.5 (top) and E15.5 (bottom) and quantifications show a ring of vimentin-positive fibroblasts (arrows) surrounding the placode (n = 12 (E14.5) and 10 (E15.5) placodes pooled across three mice/group; Student’s t-test). i, Representative live imaging snapshots showing the bottom of the placode and the surrounding ring of fibroblasts (top). The region of laser ablation is indicated (rectangle), and the vectors (arrows) show the recoil magnitude and direction after ablation. Quantification of the mean displacement direction over time (bottom) shows fibroblast recoil away from the cut, while placode cells displace towards the cut (n = 92 (fibroblasts) or 45 (placode) from 45 positions pooled across six mice). Minimum-to-maximum box plots show 75th, 50th and 25th percentiles. Scale bars, 50 μm (a) or 20 μm (other panels). All images are representative of three mice per group.
Extended Data Fig. 2. Quantification of forces during tissue deformation.
(a, b) Representative images (a) and quantification (b) of placode curvature at E14.5 and E15.5 (n = 9 (E14.5) or 6 (E15.5) placodes pooled across 3 embryos/ stage; Mann-Whitney). Scale bars 20 μm. (c) Representative snapshots of whole embryo live imaging with regions of laser ablation highlighted (dotted circle) and vectors showing recoil magnitude and direction after ablation (arrows). Scale bars 20 μm. (d) Quantification of mean displacement after laser ablation shows similar displacements in the epidermis and at the placode/epidermis boundary (n = 7 mice; Mean +/- SD). (e) Radial recoil as a function of distance to placode center from cuts between placode and epidermis (n = 7 mice with 6–10 placodes/mouse). (f) Representative DAPI, Keratin-10 and pMLC2-stained images from E15.5 mouse skin sections from 3 independent experiments. Scale bars 20 μm. (g) Quantification shows a decrease in pMLC2 intensity in placode at E15.5 (n = 10 placodes from 3 explants/condition; paired t-test). (h) Quantification of mean displacement after laser ablation shows larger displacement in the fibroblast ring than in the adjacent dermis (n = 8 mice with 4–10 placodes and adjacent dermis/mouse). (i) Quantification of the direction and magnitude of the mean displacement over time shows no preferential direction of recoil in the fibroblasts adjacent to the ring (n = 97 adjacent dermis from 8 mice). Minimum-to-maximum box plots show the 75th, 50th, 25th percentiles.
To identify the source(s) of tension on the placode, we examined the patterns of actomyosin contractility. Phosphorylated myosin light chain-2 (pMLC2), which binds to the myosin-II heavy chain and generates contractile force, was higher along the apical domain than at the basal surface in both placodes and epidermal cells at E14.5, and also particularly enriched in the suprabasal cells (Fig. 2e–g). Consistent with the laser ablation studies, pMLC2 was overall lower within the basal cells of the placode than in the surrounding basal cells of the epidermis (Fig. 2e–g). At E15.5, pMLC2 remained low within the placode and high within the suprabasal layers. In contrast, high myosin activity was detected within the dermis, particularly within a ring-like structure around the placode (Extended Data Fig. 2f,g). Co-staining with vimentin and Edar confirmed this structure as a dense ring of fibroblasts aligned tangentially around the placode, which was detectable at E14.5 and became even more prominent at E15.5 (Fig. 2h). In contrast to an ablation in an adjacent region, specific laser ablation of the fibroblast ring revealed directional displacement of fibroblasts away from the cut, indicating that this structure was under tension (Fig. 2i, Extended Data Fig. 2h,i and Supplementary Video 6). In contrast, the placode cells showed less displacement, and this occurred toward the ablation, indicating that placode cells were being confined by the contractile fibroblasts (Fig. 2i).
Collectively these data confirmed that initial placode morphogenesis occurred in two stages: thickening/elongation at E14.5 was characterized by centripetal contractile tissue fluctuations, while at E15.5 the tissue underwent a transition towards downward tissue flows, constrained by in-plane contractions. Consistently, although contractility was low within the placode, a ring of contractile fibroblast developed to tightly wrap around the placode base, confining the placode cells.
Modelling suggests cooperative forces in shape changes
To understand how the observed patterns of forces could generate the placode shape, we turned to quantitative mechanical modelling. We developed a multilayered 3D vertex model that consisted of basal epidermal and placode cells adhering to a basement membrane, as well as multiple layers of suprabasal cells (details are provided in the Methods, and Supplementary Table 1 presents the model parameters). We used the model to probe how three experimentally observed morphological features—cell elongation, basal and apical placode cell surface area, and deformation/curvature of the epithelium (Fig. 3a)—are generated by the observed patterns of epidermal myosin activity, tissue tension and fibroblast contractility. We explored two hypotheses in parallel: model 1, where cell-intrinsic changes in lateral interfacial tension in placode cells drive the morphological changes, and model 2, where extrinsic forces, such as those generated by the fibroblast ring around the placode, drive the changes (Fig. 3b). In both cases we assumed that the observed asymmetry in myosin activity generates asymmetry in the tensions/wetting coefficients for the apical and basal surfaces of the placode cells, which we describe in terms of a wetting coefficient at interfaces between the placode and suprabasal cells , and between placode cells and the basement membrane () (see Methods for more details). For model 1, we additionally altered the wetting coefficient describing tensions at lateral interfaces between the placode cells, while for model 2, we simulated external contractile forces by imposing forces directed towards the centre of the placode on all vertices of cells peripheral to the placode. The maximum force (fr) occurs at the edge of the placode, and forces decay exponentially towards zero over a length scale of several cell diameters away from the placode edge. To explore the effect of a wide range of parameters on the morphology of the placode, we generated phase diagrams (Fig. 3c,d and Extended Data Fig. 3a,b) by varying the basal-to-apical wetting coefficient (), lateral wetting coefficient and the magnitude of extrinsic forces (fr) over the entire physiological range (beyond this range, the placode does not maintain integrity or produces abnormal curvatures).
Fig. 3. Modelling suggests cooperative forces in cell shape transformations.
a, Schematics of the placode and parameters measured from embryos and simulations. b, Schematic of the two models where either the lateral wetting coefficient (; model 1) or the magnitude of extrinsic forces (fr; model 2) was varied in combination with a changing basal-to-apical wetting coefficient . c,d, Phase diagrams of curvatures induced by interaction of the lateral wetting coefficient (c) or extrinsic lateral forces (d) with varying changing basal-to-apical wetting coefficient. Note the generation of tissue curvature resembling the placode architecture with high lateral forces and a high basal-to-apical wetting coefficient. e, Comparison of morphological measurements from E14.5 and E15.5 embryos to simulations shows that model 2, with lateral cell non-autonomous forces, recapitulates in vivo morphological transformations across both developmental stages, whereas model 1 recapitulates cell shape changes at E14.5. f, In silico PIV analysis of tissue flow velocities and mean divergence of the flows from simulations with differential lateral wetting coefficient (model 1) or extrinsic lateral forces (model 2). n.l.u., normalized length unit; s.t.u., simulated time unit; s.l.u., simulated length unit.
Extended Data Fig. 3. 3D vertex modelling to predict roles of lateral interfacial tension and extrinsic forces in placode formation.
(a, b) Phase diagrams of cell elongation or changes in apical-to-basal surface length induced by interaction of lateral wetting coefficient (a) or extrinsic lateral forces (b). (c) Velocity map and mean divergence heatmap of model simulations applying high basal to apical wetting coefficient. n.l.u.= normalized length unit; s.t.u.= simulated time unit; s.l.u.= simulated length unit.
We then measured cell elongation, basal-to-apical surface ratio and the curvature of the simulated placodes and compared them directly to the quantifications performed in embryos (Fig. 3c–e and Extended Data Fig. 3a,b). The simulations showed that both wetting coefficients and extrinsic force magnitudes had a noticeable impact on the extent of placode cell elongation, basal surface expansion and placode curvature. Notably, direct comparisons with the experimental data indicated that cell-autonomous differences in the lateral wetting coefficient were sufficient to recapitulate the morphological transformations observed at E14.5, but were insufficient to fully explain the subsequent morphological changes at E15.5, as indicated by the degree of overlap between measurements from the embryo and from the simulations (Fig. 3e). In contrast, cooperation of extrinsic forces in combination with a high basal-to-apical wetting coefficient recapitulated the changes observed at both embryonic stages (Fig. 3e). Most importantly, only the extrinsic force model 2 could robustly recapitulate the pattern of negative divergence of tissue flows observed in E15.5 embryos (Fig. 3f and Extended Data Fig. 3c). Collectively, the simulations predicted that cell-autonomous changes in surface tension generated by a polarized myosin distribution could be sufficient to generate some degree of cell elongation and curvature, but were not able to explain the morphological transformation at E15.5, where cell extrinsic forces might be playing a more important role.
Placode formation requires epidermal and dermal contractility
To challenge the model that predicted the collaboration of cell-autonomous and extrinsic contractile forces in placode formation, we proceeded to examine the role of myosin contractility in the epidermal and dermal compartments. First, we deleted myosin-IIA, the major myosin isoform responsible for keratinocyte actomyosin contractility in the epidermis (Keratin-14 Cre deletion of the Myh9 gene; Myh9-eKO (ref. 18)). At E14.5, although placode development was initiated, the placodes of Myh9-eKO mice were less invaginated than in control mice (Fig. 4a,b). Also, the number of Sox9-positive cells and their local density were reduced within the Myh9-eKO placodes (Extended Data Fig. 4a–d). Interestingly, however, the cells still showed elongation comparable to cells in control mouse placodes (Fig. 4a,c). At E15.5, the placode showed a more pronounced phenotype as it failed to further invaginate. In addition, the dermal condensate, as marked by Sox2 expression19,20, was found partially embedded within the placode cells upon loss of epidermal contractility (Extended Data Fig. 4e,f). These data suggested that epidermal myosin-IIA activity was required for placode invagination and to generate forces against the dermal condensate, but it was not sufficient to induce full placode cell elongation. To challenge this notion and to further challenge the vertex model, we queried the model on the importance of the high apical myosin activity observed in the epidermis by reducing the apical interfacial tension parameter, that is, the wetting coefficient at interfaces between placode and suprabasal cells . The simulations predicted that this would lead to evagination of the placode (Extended Data Fig. 4g). Indeed, analyses of the second morphogenetic wave of placode formation at E16.5 revealed inverted curvatures of placodes in Myh9-eKO mice (Extended Data Fig. 4h,i), further strengthening the conclusion that apical/suprabasal myosin activity in the epidermis is required to produce contractile forces against the dermis.
Fig. 4. Placode development requires epidermal and dermal contractility.
a, Phalloidin- and Edar-stained cross-sections of control (CNL) and Myh9-eKO epidermis at E14.5. Scale bars, 20 μm. b,c, Quantifications of placode invagination depth (b) and placode cell surface lengths (c) from CNL and Myh9-eKO mice at E14.5 show reduced placode depth but unchanged cell morphology in Myh9-eKO mice (n = 12 (CNL) and 13 (Myh9-eKO) placodes from three mice, Student’s t-test (left) or 55 (CNL) and 53 (Myh9-eKO) cells pooled across three mice (right), two-way ANOVA/Tukey’s). d, Edar-, vimentin-, phalloidin- and DAPI-stained whole mount top views from CNL and Myh9-dKO mice at E16.5. Note there are fewer placodes in Myh9-dKO. Scale bars, 50 μm. e, Quantification of vimentin-positive fibroblast ring thickness (left) and placode numbers (right) from d. Note the reduced ring width in Myh9-dKO. Scale bars, 50 μm (n = 70 (CNL) and 55 (Myh9-dKO) placodes from three mice per group (left) and n = 4 mice per group (right), Mann–Whitney). f,g, Sox9- and phalloidin-stained images (f) and quantification (g) of skin whole mounts from CNL and Myh9-dKO mouse epidermis at E14.5. A reduced local density of Sox9+ placode cells is observed in Myh9-dKO. Scale bars, 20 µm (n = 5 mice per group; Mann–Whitney). h,i, Phalloidin- and Sox9-stained images (h) and quantifications (i) of blebbistatin-treated skin explants (10 nM for 24 h) starting at E13.5. Placodes were defined by 3D morphology and Sox9 positivity. Scale bars, 50 μm (n = 17 placodes from four mice; Mann–Whitney). j,k, Phalloidin- and Sox9-stained images (j) and quantification (k) of explants treated with blebbistatin for 24 h starting at E13.5. Circles mark placodes. Note the reduced placode/epidermis Sox9 intensity ratio in blebbistatin-treated explants. Scale bars, 20 μm (n = 11 (DMSO) and 13 (blebbistatin) placodes from three mice; Mann–Whitney). l,m, Schematic of the microfabrication design (l, top), representative images of a top view (l, middle) and a cross-section (l, bottom), and quantification (m) of epidermal progenitor cells cultured on microfabricated substrates and immunostained for Sox9 and DAPI. Note the increased Sox9 at the indentation boundary. Scale bars, 20 μm (n = 4 independent experiments; one-sample t-test). Minimum-to-maximum box plots show the 75th, 50th and 25th percentiles. All images are representative of three mice per group.
Extended Data Fig. 4. Epidermal contractility is required for placode downward budding.
(a) Representative top views from basal layer of E14.5 CNL and Myh9-eKO mouse epidermis. Arrows mark Sox9-positive placodes. Scale bars 50 μm. Images representative of 4 mice/group. (b-d) Representative images (b) and quantification (c, d) of Sox9 pattern of expression from E15.5 CNL and Myh9-eKO mouse epidermis. Note reduced number of Sox9-positive cells (c) and local density (d) in Myh9-eKO placodes. Scale bars 50 μm. (n = 14 (CNL) and 15 (Myh9-eKO) placodes from 3 mice/group; (c) Mann-Whitney; (d) Student’s t-test). (e) Phalloidin, LN-511 and Sox2-stained sagittal cross sections of CNL and Myh9-eKO mouse epidermis at E15.5. Sections from placode center and dermal condensate (DC; red asterisk) are shown. Note position of DC within the placode in Myh9-eKO. Scale bars 10 μm. Images representative of 3 mice/group. (f) Quantifications of placode depth from CNL and Myh9-eKO mice at E15.5 shows reduced placode depth in Myh9-eKO mice (n = 12 (CNL) and 15 (Myh9-eKO) placodes from 3 mice (left); Student’s test). (g) Phase diagrams of cell elongation, placode curvature or changes in apical-to-basal surface length induced by varying basal to apical wetting coefficient. The model predicts that if apical interfacial tension is reduced the placode will evaginate into the suprabasal layer instead of invaginate into the basement membrane. n.l.u = normalized length unit. (h, i) Cross sections (h) and quantification (i) of second-wave placodes in control (CNL) or Myh9-eKO embryos at E16.5 showing placode depth (left) and the evagination (right). Schematic shows how measurements were performed. Scale bars, 20 µm (n = 17 (CNL) and 22 (Myh9-eKO) placodes from 3 mice; Mann-Whitney (I, left) and Student’s test (I, right)). Minimum-to-maximum box plots show the 75th, 50th, 25th percentiles.
As the simulations predicted a critical role for extrinsic forces in placode formation, we proceeded to examine the role of the contractile fibroblasts around the developing placode. To this end, we deleted Myh9 specifically in fibroblasts using Twist2-promoter driven Cre21 (Myh9-dKO; targeting dermal fibroblasts lining the epidermis and placodes high in Twist2 expression; Extended Data Fig. 5a). Analyses of the fibroblast ring showed reduced thickness in Myh9-dKO mice dermis (Fig. 4d,e and Extended Data Fig. 5b), confirming the hypothesis that myosin-IIA activity is required to assemble the ring of fibroblasts surrounding the placode. Importantly, much fewer placodes, as defined by Edar expression and the presence of a Sox2-positive dermal condensate, were observed in the Myh9-dKO epidermis at E14.5 (Extended Data Fig. 5c,d). Where placodes had formed, they displayed slightly reduced invagination, and cells within these Myh9-dKO placodes were less vertically elongated (Extended Data Fig. 5e,f). This severe defect in placode morphogenesis became even more obvious when the second wave of placode morphogenesis initiated at E16.5, quantified by reduced placode number and increased distance between individual placodes (Fig. 4d,e and Extended Data Fig. 5g). This indicated that myosin-IIA activity in the dermal fibroblasts and extrinsic mechanical forces are essential to promote placode formation, as also predicted by the simulations. Surprisingly, whereas in control mice Sox9-expressing cells were compartmentalized at the placode–epidermis interface, forming a ring-like structure, Myh9-dKO placodes showed an overall more dispersed Sox9 localization within the epidermis (Fig. 4f). Quantification revealed significant reductions in the number and density of Sox9-expressing cells, in particular around the prospective placode boundary defined by the presence of the dermal condensate and epithelial thickening (Fig. 4f,g and Extended Data Fig. 5h). Additionally, and in contrast to the Myh9-eKO, a significant increase of the average distance of Sox9-positive cells from the centre of the placode and in the total area of tissue containing Sox9-positive cells was observed in the Myh9-dKO placodes, indicative of a failure of Sox9 compartmentalization (Extended Data Fig. 5h,i).
Extended Data Fig. 5. Contractility is required for placode development.
(a) E15.5 epidermis stained for DAPI, Vimentin and Twist2. (b) Whole mount dermal level top views of E16.5 skin stained for Vimentin. Fiber orientation (right) is shown in degrees. Note attenuated alignment of the fibroblasts around the placode in Myh9-dKO compared to control (CNL). (c) Whole mount top views stained for Sox2, Edar and DAPI show dermal condensate in E14.5 Myh9-dKO. (d, e) Quantifications of placode numbers (d) and depth (e) from CNL and Myh9-dKO at E14.5 (n = 5 mice/group (d) or n = 21 (CNL) and 23 (Myh9-dKO) placodes from 5 mice/group (e); Mann-Whitney). (f) Quantifications of placode cell surface lengths at E14.5. (n = 113 (CNL) and 126 (Myh9-dKO) cells pooled across 5 mice/group; 2-way ANOVA/Tukey’s. (g) Quantifications of the distance between placodes at E16.5 (n = 4 mice/group; Mann-Whitney). (h) Quantification of Sox9-postive cell number (left) and mean distance from placode center (right) at E14.5. (n = 21 (CNL) and 26 (Myh9-dKO) placodes from 5 mice/group; Mann-Whitney; left and n = 5 mice/group; Mann-Whitney; right) (i) Quantification of minimum area of Sox9-positive cells (convex hull) shows a wider distribution of Sox9 expression in Myh9-dKO (n = 21 (CNL), 26 (Myh9-dKO), 14 (CNL) and 15 (Myh9-eKO) placodes pooled across 3 mice (Myh9-eKO / CNL) or 5 mice (Myh9-dKO / CNL); one-way ANOVA/Tukey’s). (j) Top views of skin explants treated with Blebbistatin for 24 h starting at E14.5, stained with DAPI, Phalloidin and Sox2 to identify dermal condensate. (k) Quantification of mitoses in DMSO- or Blebbistatin -treated explants for 24 h starting at E14.5 (Mann-Whitney; n = 3 explants/condition; mean +/- SD). (l, m) Representative images (l) and quantification (m) of phalloidin-stained Blebbistatin-treated explants (10 nM; for 24 h starting at E14.5). Note attenuated placode invagination and indentation of placode by dermal condensate (asterisk) in blebbistatin-treated explants (n = 12 (DMSO) and 13 (Blebbistatin) placodes from 3 mice; Mann-Whitney). (n) Schematic representation of organoid compression experiments. (o, p) Representative images (o) and quantification (p) of Sox9-stained control and compressed organoids (n = 50 (CNL), 56 (3 h) and 40 (16 h) organoids pooled across 4 independent experiments; Kruskal-Wallis/Dunn’s; mean +/- SD). Minimum-to-maximum box plots show 75th, 50th, 25th percentiles. Scale bars 30 μm (l) or 30 μm (all other panels).
To investigate the potential collaborative role of myosin contractility across the compartments, we prepared full skin explants from E13.5 and E14.5 mice and treated them with blebbistatin for 24 h to block myosin activity in all cells. Strikingly, when myosin was inhibited in all cells at E13.5, the placodes, defined by cell shape changes associated with Sox9 expression and the presence of a Sox2-positive dermal condensate, almost completely failed to develop (Fig. 4h,i and Extended Data Fig. 5j), indicating a critical role of collective myosin activity in both compartments in placode thickening as also predicted by the model. Importantly, no substantial effects on cell proliferation were observed with the blebbistatin concentration used (Extended Data Fig. 5k). In addition to the morphogenetic defects, Sox9 expression failed to become compartmentalized into the placode cells at the boundary (Fig. 4j,k). Treating E14.5 embryos instead resulted in an impairment of placode invagination into the dermis, with the dermal condensate partially indenting the epithelial structure (Extended Data Fig. 5l,m), indicating that myosin-II activity is further required for placode invagination and curvature. The above genetic experiments implicate a major role for myosin-IIA in this process, but additional or compensatory effects from myosin-IIB are also possible22.
As reducing the extrinsic forces on the placode by myosin-IIA inhibition resulted not only in reduced placode formation but also in reduced Sox9 levels and compartmentalization, we hypothesized that mechanical confinement of the placode cells by the contractile fibroblast ring could enhance Sox9 expression and compartmentalization to the outer ring of the placode. To test this, we isolated epidermal progenitor cells and placed them on microfabricated moulds that were designed to recapitulate the placode invagination (Fig. 4l). With a striking resemblance to the ring-like pattern of Sox9 expression observed in vivo, Sox9 expression was highest at the boundary of the microfabricated substrate invaginations (Fig. 4l,m). To specifically ask whether confinement is sufficient to promote Sox9 expression, we cultured epidermal progenitors in 3D collagen hydrogels and subjected them to extrinsic static compression (Extended Data Fig. 5n). Robust Sox9 expression was already observed after 3 h of compression, and the effect was sustained after 16 h of compression (Extended Data Fig. 5o,p). Collectively, these data, in line with the model predictions, indicated that changes in epidermal interfacial tension through altered myosin-IIA-mediated epidermal contractility are required to produce the contractile force for the placode to invaginate and to push down the dermal condensate. However, the full morphogenetic transformation of cell elongation and tissue deformation require additional extrinsic forces generated by a contractile fibroblast ring wrapping the placode. Surprisingly, these extrinsic forces are also essential for promoting compartmentalization of the tissue by directing patterns of Sox9 expression, similar to what has previously been shown in mouse digit development23,24. Whether this effect is direct or indirect remains open for future studies.
Coordinated cell divisions controls placode downgrowth
We next asked what facilitated the profound transition of the placode from an initial epithelial thickening at E14.5 to a downward flowing, budded structure at E15.5. To this end we investigated patterns of cell divisions that have been shown to promote tissue fluidification as well as Drosophila tracheal budding and epithelial buckling25–28. Using both embryo live imaging of Histone2B-mCherry/membrane-enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) mice to visualize dividing cells (R26R-RG mice29) and quantitative imaging of Ki67-stained fixed tissues, we examined the patterns of proliferation at E14.5 and E15.5. These analyses showed that cell divisions were substantially more frequent within the epidermis at E14.5, compared to the placode (Fig. 5a,c and Supplementary Video 7). This low mitotic frequency in the placode was associated with decreased levels of active nuclear YAP (Fig. 5a,d), the mechanosensitive transcription factor that acts within the Hippo pathway to control growth and tissue size30,31. In stark contrast, at E15.5, the most invaginated lower surfaces of the placodes showed higher levels of cell division (Fig. 5b,c and Supplementary Video 8), accompanied by restoration of nuclear active YAP (Fig. 5b,d), consistent with previous work showing that YAP promotes proliferation in the epidermis and hair follicle, and that cell compression promotes nuclear exit of YAP to inhibit cell division32,33. In line with this, inhibition of YAP in freshly isolated epidermal progenitors showed decreased levels of cell division (Extended Data Fig. 6a,b). Collectively, this indicated that mechanical confinement of E14.5 placode cells contributed to the repression of cell divisions through nuclear exclusion of YAP.
Fig. 5. Spatiotemporal coordination of cell divisions controls placode budding.
a,b, DAPI, Ki67 and active YAP (aYAP)-stained sagittal cross-sections of E14.5 (a) and E15.5 (b) epidermis. Scale bars, 20 μm. Images are representative of three mice per group. c,d, Quantification of Ki67 (c) and aYAP (d) from E14.5 and E15.5 placodes and epidermis. Note the low levels of Ki67 and aYAP in E14.5 placode and the return to levels comparable with epidermis in E15.5 placodes (n = 11 (E14.5) and 9 (E15.5) placodes or surrounding epidermis from three mice per group; one-way ANOVA (c) and Kruskal–Wallis (d)). e, Experimental outline and optical cross-sections and top views of E14.5 phalloidin-stained mitomycin C-treated and DMSO control skin explant cultures. Scale bars, 20 μm. Images are representative of three explants per group. f, Quantification of placode depth from the experiments shown in e (n = 10 (CNL) and 9 (Mito-C) placodes from three explants; Student’s t-tests). Note the reduced placode depth in mitomycin-treated skin explants.
Extended Data Fig. 6. Yap-dependent regulation of cell proliferation and basement membrane remodeling is required for placode development.
(a, b) Representative images (a) and quantification (b) of active YAP (aYAP; top) and proliferation (Ki67; bottom) in isolated epidermal stem cells treated with YAP inhibitor Verteporfin (10 µM, 6 h) (n = 6 independent experiments, paired t-test). (c) Top views of Phalloidin/Sox2-stained Mito-C- and DMSO-treated control explants isolated from E14.5 mice. Images representative of 3 mice/group. (d) Quantification of mitotic cells in placodes (PLAC) and interfollicular epidermis (EPI) of skin explants from E14.5 mice treated Mito-C. Note reduced mitoses in Mito-C-treated explants (n = 10 (CNL), 9 (Mito-C) placodes (PLAC) or surrounding epidermis (EPI) from 3 mice/group; Kruskal-Wallis/Dunn’s). (e) Quantification of placode diameter in explants from E14.5 mice treated Mito-C (n = 10 (CNL), 9 (Mito-C) placodes from 3 mice/group; Student’s t-test). (f) UMAP projections of single cell RNA seq data from E14.5 skin. Note MMP-14 expression in placode (black circle) and fibroblast cells and MMP-2 expression in fibroblasts. (g) Quantification of images shown in (Fig. 6f) shows reduced placode diameter in GM6001-treated explants (n = 12 (CNL) and 16 (GM6001) placodes from 3 explants/condition; Mann-Whitney). Minimum-to-maximum box plots show the 75th, 50th, 25th percentiles. Scale bars 50 μm.
The enrichment of cell divisions outside of the placode at E14.5 and subsequently broadly within the basal cell layer of the placode at E15.5 led us to hypothesize that high levels of divisions at the placode base at E15.5 could accelerate budding. To test this hypothesis, we prepared skin explants from E14.5 mice and treated them with mitomycin C for 3 h to halt cell divisions, followed by 24 h of culture to allow further morphogenesis (Fig. 5e and Extended Data Fig. 6c,d). Indeed, blocking cell divisions at E14.5 did not substantially affect placode diameter, but strongly attenuated budding (Fig. 5e,f and Extended Data Fig. 6e).
Collectively, these data indicated that confinement of the placode at E14.5 promotes nuclear exclusion of YAP, contributing to reducing cell divisions, and the subsequent folding/buckling of the epithelium at E15.5 releases compressive stress on the placode, facilitating YAP activation, cell-cycle re-entry and mitoses, which then enhance efficient budding of the placode.
Basement membrane remodelling facilitates placode budding
Finally, we asked what facilitated release of mechanical confinement, allowing cell-cycle re-entry and downward budding of the placode. Previous work using oncogenic mutations to model epidermal tumours showed that active basement membrane remodelling, triggering its local softening, drove the formation of tumour buds34. Indeed, simulations using our vertex model predicted that basement membrane softening would result in placode invagination (Fig. 6a). To test whether placode budding was associated with basement membrane softening, we first analysed the basement membrane composition using immunofluorescence, but did not observe substantial changes in the presence of the two major laminins, LN-511 and LN-332, or collagen IV, at the sites of placode compared to the surrounding epidermis, and the basement membrane appeared continuous across the placode (Fig. 6b,c). However, measurements of the stiffness of the basement membrane using atomic force microscopy revealed a slightly softer basement membrane beneath the placode at E14.5. This local softening became significantly more pronounced at E15.5 (Fig. 6d).
Fig. 6. Basement remodelling is required for placode downgrowth.
a, Comparison of morphological measurements from E14.5 and E15.5 embryos to vertex model simulations shows that decreasing basement membrane stiffness below the placode is sufficient to induce placode cell elongation, invagination and curvature to that observed at E14.5. n.l.u., normalized length unit. b, Collagen IV (Col IV), laminin (LN)-511 and LN-332-stained cross-sections of E14.5 and E15.5 epidermis. Scale bars, 10 μm. Images are representative of three mice per group. c, Quantification of images from b show no substantial differences in Col IV or LN-332/511 intensity between epidermis (EPI) and placode (PLAC) (n = 13 (laminins) and 10 (Col IV) tissue sections pooled across three mice per group; Student’s t-test). d, Quantification of elastic moduli of basement membranes using force indentation spectroscopy. Note the reduced elastic moduli of basement membranes below placodes (n = 55 (E14; EPI), 75 (E14; PLAC), 32 (E15; EPI) and 54(E15; PLAC) force curves pooled across three mice per group; Kolmogorov–Smirnov). e, Top views (top panels) and optical cross-sections (bottom panels) of DAPI, Sox2 and phalloidin-stained skin explant cultures isolated from E14.5 mice and treated with GM6001 (10 µM) or DMSO control for 48 h. Scale bars, 20 μm. Images are representative of three explants per group. DC, dermal condensate. f, Quantification of images shown in e show reduced placode depth in GM6001-treated explants (n = 12 (CNL) and 16 (GM6001) placodes from three explants per condition; Mann–Whitney). g, Model of placode formation, indicating early cell fate specification (E13.5) followed by polarized myosin activity and assembly of a peri-placode contractile fibroblast ring to generate tissue elongation and basal cell surface expansion (E14.5–E15.5). Tissue elongation builds up pressure, which is released by basement membrane remodelling, allowing YAP activation, localized cell divisions and placode budding (E15.5). SC, stem cell. Box plots show 10th to 90th percentile whiskers with 75th, 50th and 25th percentiles (d), or minimum-to-maximum with 75th, 50th and 25th percentiles (c,f).
To address the mechanism of local basement membrane softening in the absence of substantial changes in molecular composition, we asked if proteolysis-driven turnover could play a role. We first examined the expression of extracellular matrix (ECM)-degrading enzymes by re-analysing single-cell sequencing data from the E14.5 mouse skin35. We analysed protease expression in the various skin cell populations (Supplementary Table 2) and found the key proteolytic enzyme matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 highly expressed by the dermal fibroblasts, and the membrane bound MMP-14 specifically enriched in the placode as well as in the dermal condensate (Extended Data Fig. 6f). Other MMPs were not expressed at high levels (Supplementary Table 2). To test whether MMP-mediated matrix remodelling was required for placode invagination, we treated E13.5 skin explants for 48 h with the broad-spectrum MMP inhibitor GM6001 to block proteolytic degradation of the ECM and basement membrane. Strikingly, inhibiting matrix remodelling strongly attenuated placode budding, as visualized by both the decreased diameter and depth of the developing placodes within the explants (Fig. 6e,f and Extended Data Fig. 6g). Collectively, these data indicated that ECM remodelling triggered by proteolytic degradation is essential for placode growth by allowing pressure release and subsequent downgrowth.
Discussion
By combining 3D vertex modelling with ex vivo biophysical measurements and genetic manipulations, we have dissected a two-step mechanism of placode morphogenesis and compartmentalization that depends on the coordination of mechanical forces across compartments. In the first step, polarized myosin activity in the epithelium, together with contractile activity from fibroblasts, generate oscillatory contractions to produce a local, mechanically confined tissue thickening (Fig. 6g). In the second step, release of pressure through local ECM remodelling facilitates tissue fluidification, which, due to the continuing oscillatory contraction, produces a plastic deformation and downward budding of the tissue (Fig. 6g). The precisely timed interactions between cell types and the forces they generate, and the transmission of these forces through the ECM and tissue mechanical changes, highlight the complexity of orchestrating morphogenesis and cell state transitions in multicompartment mammalian tissues. Interestingly, in vitro studies in experimentally confined epithelial cell lines have revealed a similar interplay between pressure, growth control, and buckling32,36, suggesting that the mechanisms described here could be applicable to developmental processes in other epithelial organs. Furthermore, the effect of confinement on stem cell differentiation is consistent with previous work linking tension to cell fate progression through changes in chromatin organization18,37.
Our findings are further interesting in light of recent reports showing that mesenchymal dynamics regulate feather follicle patterning in avian skin38,39. Collectively, these studies highlight how mechanical crosstalk across compartments is essential to propagate symmetry-breaking and the emergence of tissue patterns. Our work also identifies an interesting distinction where the murine placode early fate specification seems to precede mechanical changes, which subsequently are essential for further cell type specification and, in particular, compartmentalization of cell fates. Interestingly, the distinct role of fibroblasts in generating forces, and adjusting pressure through remodelling the ECM, recapitulate features observed between cancer-associated fibroblasts and tumour cells during cancer progression34,40. These common features between placode development/budding and cancer progression are consistent with observations on cancer cells hijacking embryonal pathways to promote aggression41–43. This suggest that the mechanisms discovered in this study, as well as the modelling approaches developed, could be of broad relevance for various biological processes. In particular, it will be interesting to understand how stromal fibroblasts and changing patterns of epithelial contractility, pressure and tissue fluidity play roles in the initiation of cancer aggression.
Methods
Mice
All mouse studies were approved and carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the Finnish national animal experimentation board (ELLA) or the Ministry for Environment, Agriculture, Conservation and Consumer Protection of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia (LANUW), Germany. Mice were maintained under a 12-h/12-h light–dark cycle, under controlled temperature and humidity (18–23 °C and 40–60%, respectively) and with constant access to food and water. Myh9 floxed mice were obtained from the European Mouse Mutant Archive (EM:02572)44 and crossed with the K14-Cre line18,45 or the Twist2-Cre line obtained from JAX laboratories (stock #008712)21. Membrane-targeted Tomato reporter mice (R26RmT/mG)16 were from JAX laboratories (stock #007676)16. Histone2B-mCherry/membrane-EGFP (R26R-RG) mice29 were from Riken Laboratories for Animal Resources and Genetic Engineering (LARGE) and were crossed with the K14-Cre line to obtain epidermis-specific expression. FGF20-LacZ mice have been previously described7. Embryonic ages 13.5, 14.5, 15.5 and 16.6 were used and defined by the presence of vaginal plug (embryonic day 0), limb morphology and other external criteria46.
Immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy
For whole mounts, embryos were collected and directly fixed in 37 °C pre-warmed 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) at room temperature (r.t.) for 3 h. After multiple phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) washes, the skin was peeled and placed in blocking solution (0.5% Triton-X, 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 3% normal goat serum (NGS)) for 1 h at r.t.
For paraffin sections, tissues were fixed in 4% PFA, embedded in paraffin and sectioned. Sections were de-paraffinized using a graded alcohol series, and antigen retrieval was carried out using target retrieval solution (Dako) at pH 6 or 9 in a pressure cooker.
For cryosections, tissue samples were embedded unfixed in Tissue Tek O.C.T. (opimal cutting temperature) Compound (Sakura) and frozen, then 6–8-μm-thick sections were cut and fixed with 4% PFA. For basement membrane stainings, unfixed cryosections were stained. All samples were blocked in 5% BSA, 3% NGS.
Organoids and a 2D cell culture of primary epidermal stem cells were fixed in 4% PFA for 1 h at r.t. After PBS washes, the samples were placed in blocking solution (0.5% Triton-X, 5% BSA, 3% NGS) for 1 h at r.t.
The samples were incubated with primary antibodies diluted in blocking solution overnight at 4 °C (organoids and 2D cell culture) or at r.t. (whole mounts). For paraffin sections, antibodies were diluted in Dako antibody diluent (Agilent) overnight at 4 °C. The following primary antibodies were used: goat anti-Edar (R&D Systems, AF745; 1:200) rabbit anti-p-MLC2 (p-Ser20; Abcam, 2480; 1:100) rabbit anti-vimentin (Abcam, 185030; 1:100), rabbit anti-Sox9 (Cell Signaling, 82630; 1:100), rabbit anti-Sox2 (Millipore Sigma, AB5603; 1:200), mouse anti-Twist2 (Abcam, 50887; 1:200), mouse anti-Ki67 (Cell Signaling, 9449; 1:300), rabbit anti-active YAP1 (Abcam, 205270; 1:100), guinea-pig anti-keratin 14 (Progen, GP-CK14; 1:300), rabbit anti-collagen IV (Abcam, 6586; 1:200), rabbit anti-laminin 332 (gift from R. E. Burgeson47; 1:20,000), rat anti-laminin α5 (504 (ref. 48); gift from L. Sorokin; 1:20,000) and chicken anti-β-galactosidase (Abcam, 9361; 1:500). F-actin was detected using Alexa647-conjugated phalloidin (1:500). The following secondaries (all from Invitrogen) were used to visualize primary antibodies and nuclei: anti-rabbit immunoglobulin-G (IgG) Alexa Fluor 488/568 (A11008/A10042; 1/500); anti-mouse IgG1/IgG2A Alexa Fluor 546 (A21123/A21134; 1/500); anti-rat IgG-rat Alexa Fluor 647 (A21247; 1/500); anti-goat IgG Alexa Fluor 488 (A21467); anti-chicken IgG Alexa Fluor 488 (A21449; 1/500); 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Invitrogen). Slides were mounted in Elvanol (Mowiol (Sigma; #81381), Dabco (Sigma; #D27802), glycerol (ThermoFisher; #BP229-1)).
All fluorescence images were collected by laser scanning confocal microscopy (SP8, Leica or LSM80, Zeiss) with the Leica Application Suite (LAS X version 2.0.0.14332) or Zeiss ZEN (Zeiss ZEN version 3.5) software. We used ×20 dry and ×40/×63 water-immersion objectives. Images were acquired at r.t. using sequential scanning of frames of 1-µm-thick confocal planes (pinhole 1). Images were collected with the same settings for all samples within an experiment.
Ex vivo embryo imaging
Imaging was performed essentially as described previously37. Briefly, embryos were dissected at E14.5 or E15.5 and immobilized on imaging chambers engineered on top of Lumox-Teflon imaging plates (Sarstedt). Whole embryos were immersed in growth medium (CnT-PR, CELLnTEC Advanced Cell Systems) supplemented with calcium-depleted 10% FBS (HyClone/Thermo Fisher), 20 U ml−1 penicillin-streptomycin (Thermo Fisher), 20 mM Hepes, 1.8 mM CaCl2 and 10 ng ml−1 human recombinant Epithelial growth factor (EGF) (Novus; NBP2-34952). Imaging was performed using an Andor Dragonfly 505 high-speed spinning disk confocal microscope (Oxford Instruments) equipped with 488-nm and 546-nm lasers, an Andor Zyla 4.2 sCMOS camera and an environmental chamber set at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Acquisition was carried out with ×25, ×40 dry or ×40 water-immersion objectives using the Fusion 2.0 software. After acquisition, the image series was 3D drift-corrected using manual registration on ImageJ together with the descriptor-based series registration ImageJ plug-in, before analysis. Image analyses are described in detail in the following. Optical cross-section live image sequences were generated using the oblique slicer tool on Imaris.
Skin explants
Embryonic back skins were dissected from E13.5 or E14.5 embryos, placed at 37 °C, 5% CO2 on a 3-μm-pore-size cell culture insert (Corning) in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with Glutamax, 10% FBS, 1% penicillin-streptomycin at an air–liquid interface, as previously described49. Skins were dissected into two pieces, and one half was treated with DMSO as control and the other half with mitomycin C (1 µg ml−1; Sigma), blebbistatin (10 nM; Sigma) or GM6001 (10 μM; Sigma) for 3, 24 or 48 h as indicated. After culture, tissues were fixed and processed for immunofluorescence as described above for whole mounts.
Cell culture, microfabrication and hydrogels
Epidermal stem cells were isolated from E15.5 embryos (organoids) or P0 mice (2D culture). After dissection, skins were treated with antibiotic/antimycotic solution (Sigma A5955) for 5 min, and epidermal single cell suspensions were generated by incubating skin pieces in 5 U ml−1 Dispase II (D4693) for 90 min at 4 °C (15.5 embryonic skins) to separate the epidermis from the dermis; followed by 0.8% trypsin for 10 min (E15.5 skins) or 30 min (P0 skins) at 37 °C. Organoid cultures were performed as described previously50. Briefly, cells were suspended in growth factor-reduced Matrigel (Corning) and grown in in 3C medium (MEM Spinner’s modification (Sigma), 5 µg ml−1 insulin (Sigma), 10 ng ml−1 EGF (Sigma), 10 µg ml−1 transferrin (Sigma), 10 µM phosphoethanolamine (Sigma), 10 µM ethanolamine (Sigma), 0.36 µg ml−1 hydrocortisone (Calbiochem), 2 mM glutamine (Gibco), 100 U ml−1 penicillin, 100 µg ml−1 streptomycin (Gibco), 10% chelated fetal calf serum (Gibco), 5 µM Y27632, 20 ng ml−1 mouse recombinant vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF) and 20 ng ml−1 human recombinant fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) (all from Miltenyi Biotec)). For 2D cultures, cells were seeded on glass coverslips coated with 30 µg ml−1 collagen I (Millipore) and 10 µg ml−1 fibronectin (Millipore) for 1 h at 37 °C. Cells were cultured in 3C medium, incubated with DMSO or verteporfin (10 µM; Stem Cell technologies) for 6 h before fixation.
For microfabrication, circular patterns (100 µm in diameter) were projected on an SU8 spin-coated silicon wafer (height, 20 µm) using the Primo UV-lithography system controlled by Leonardo software (v4.21) and mounted on a Nikon Eclipse Ti2 microscope controlled by Nikon software (NIS Elements AR.5.41.01). After UV illumination (7 mJ with 100% laser power), the wafers were baked on a hot plate at 95 °C for 4 min and transferred into propylene glycol methyl ether acetate (PGMEA) for 4 min. After three PGMEA washes and three washes with isopropanol, the dry wafers were silanized in a vacuum chamber for 2 h. Desiccated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) was poured on the wafers and they were then baked overnight at 65 °C. Freshly isolated epidermal cells were seeded on O2 plasma-cleaned PDMS gels in 3C medium, cultured for 24 h, then 300 µM CaCl2 was added for 8 h before fixation with PFA, followed by immunofluorescence.
For compression studies, silicon cylinders (weight, 500 g) were placed on top of hydrogels at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 3 h or 16 h. After compression, samples were directly fixed and immunofluorescence were performed as described above. The uncompressed control sample was fixed together with the 3-h compression sample.
Laser ablation
E14.5 and E15.5 embryos were collected and immobilized on imaging chambers as described above. Immediately after collection, imaging and photo-ablation were performed using a Zeiss LSM880 confocal microscope equipped with a 561-nm laser, a two-photon Ti:sapphire laser (Mai Tai DeepSee, Spectra Physics) and an incubation system set at 37 °C, 5% CO2. For ablation, 800 nm and 75% laser power were used. Images were acquired with a ×40/1.30 numerical aperture oil objective. The region to be ablated was drawn as indicated in the respective figure panels, and the same thickness was used for all ablations within an experiment. Images were captured at 1-s intervals for 40 s, starting 5 s before ablation. Quantification of displacements after ablation was performed as previously described36. Briefly, PIV was performed on the entire field of view using a window size of 64 × 64 pixels and an overlap of 0.75. Each timepoint was compared to the last timepoint before ablation to obtain tissue displacement. For radial displacement profiles, the local normal direction with respect to the ablated region was computed as described in ref. 36. This normal direction was used to calculate the radial component of the displacement, which was then averaged as a function of distance to the ablated region. The radial displacement profile was used to calculate the total tissue displacement as a function of time to the distance displaced by the tissue at both sides of the cut. For this, the inner peak of negative displacement was subtracted from the outer peak of positive displacement.
To quantify the recoil of the placode cells and the fibroblast ring after radial ablation, regions of interest (ROIs) were defined to average the displacements obtained by PIV. These regions were obtained by computationally dilating the mask of the ablated region with 75 pixels, and then detecting the overlap between this dilated region and the placode/fibroblast ring. Displacements were averaged in each of these ROIs, and the magnitude and direction of this mean displacement in time was computed. The direction of the cut was defined by fitting its mask to a straight line. The angle difference between the mean displacements and the cut was then calculated (−90° towards the cut, 0 or 180° as parallel to the cut, and 90° away from the cut for fibroblasts and 0° towards the cut, +90 or −90° as perpendicular to the cut, and 180° away from the cut for the placode cells). Graphs in Fig. 2i show the direction of the mean displacement 40 s after ablation.
Image analyses
For tissue-scale analysis, 2D segmentation and morphometry were performed using Tissue Analyzer (v2.3)51. Hair follicle placodes and dermal condensates were identified based on the expression of specific markers (FGF20, Edar, Sox9 and Sox2) and morphology. Placode morphogenesis and cell shape were quantified manually using Fiji52 as follows. Placode cells were identified using FGF20 β-gal or Edar, after which phalloidin staining was used to determine cell contours. Only cells in contact with the basement membrane (basal cells), with clear contours, were quantified. Images were taken with high z-resolution (0.5 µm), resliced in ImageJ, and the appropriate stacks were selected individually for each cell. The measurements (apical/basal lengths; z-axis length) were then carried out manually for each single cell.
To quantify the placode depth, the distance between the epidermal basement membrane and the deepest point of the placode cells was measured. The closest distance between placodes was measured manually from the centre of one placode to the centre of the nearest neighbour placode.
For pMLC2 intensity, ROIs restricted to the placode cells and the surrounding interfollicular epidermal cells were determined, and mean fluorescence intensities were quantified. To quantify the ratio of apical/basal PMLC2 mean intensity, ROIs corresponding the apical and basal surfaces were generated, and the mean fluorescence intensities were quantified.
Fibroblast alignment around the placode was quantified using the Orientation J plug-in (v2.0.5) from Fiji. The local window sigma was set at 5 and a cubic spline gradient was applied. The colour map represents the orientation of the fibres in degrees. A ROI defining the placode was drawn, and the fibre alignment to the closest tangent from the ROI and a function of the distance to the ROI were computed using a custom-built Python script. Fibres up to 30 µm away from the ROI were defined as ‘placode’ and fibres between 90 and 120 µm away from the ROI were defined as ‘proximal dermis’.
Sox9-positive cells were quantified manually. The coordinates of Sox9-positive cells were extracted using Fiji. To quantify the pattern of Sox9 expression, four different parameters were measured using custom-built Python scripts: (1) the total number of Sox9-positive cells in a placode (defined by the presence of a dermal condensate and a thickening of the epithelium), (2) the local density of Sox9-positive cells within a circular area within a 10-µm radius of the placode (defined as above); (3) the average distance of Sox9-positive cells from the centre of the placode (determined as above); (4) the convex Hull area corresponding to the minimal area necessary to include all the Sox9-positive cells. To measure Sox9 mean intensities in organoids, a nuclear ROI was generated using automated thresholding of the DAPI staining, after which the mean fluorescence intensities of Sox9 were quantified within the nuclear area of interest from maximum projection images of 15 stacks. Sox9 mean nuclear intensities were normalized to the DAPI intensity of the corresponding individual nucleus. Images were collected with the same settings for all samples within an experiment.
Evaginations into the suprabasal layers from E16.6 CNL and Myh9-eKO embryos were quantified from paraffin sections. A straight line was drawn at the level of the epidermis/dermis boundary, and the length of the invagination was measured from this straight line to the top of the Krt14-positive cell population.
Ki67- and YAP1-positive cells were determined manually. The number of mitoses (from metaphase to telophase) from DMSO- or mitomycin-treated skin explants was identified using DAPI staining and manually quantified.
3D tissue rendering and 3D cell shape
Images were acquired from freshly isolated unfixed mTmG E14.5 embryos with the Andor Dragonfly 505 high-speed spinning disk confocal microscope. Images were acquired as z-stacks of 1-µm-thick optical sections, and cells were segmented and tracked across every z-stack using Tissue Analyzer, after which x–y cell dimensions were measured and treated as pseudo-time. To ensure accurate segmentation of the cell height, a nuclear bounding box was determined in parallel from skin whole mount stained with DAPI, and imaged with higher resolution using a laser scanning confocal microscopy (SP8X; Leica) with a ×63 glycerol immersion objective. 3D rendering was then performed using a custom-built code in Mathematica as follows. The cell junctions were manually corrected with a combination of Tissue Analyzer and Mathematica (v12.3), and tracking was performed to stitch the cells across the stacks. Cells that appeared in fewer than three frames were discarded from the analysis. ROIs were then converted from image objects to mesh regions in Mathematica by first applying a 3D Gaussian filter over a radius of two pixels to smooth the roughness and then applying a ‘Dual Marching Cubes’ algorithm using the ‘ImageMesh’ function. The cellular mesh regions were then rendered appropriately in a box with the scaling parameters of the image stack. The computations for cellular volume and the associated parameters were performed on the mesh objects and on point clouds derived from the mesh.
PIV
PIV was performed using PIVLab version 2.59. Live imaging movies of embryos were first imported into PIVLab, where a multiple-pass windowed fast Fourier transform (FFT) based approach was utilized to track tissue-scale flows for both sagittal and axial cross-sections. To correct for variations in intensities and prevent tracking errors, a CLAHE (contrast limited adaptive histogram equilization) was performed with a box of size 10 pixels. A denoising was also performed on the resulting images using Wiener noise filter with a maximum pixel count of 3. The tracking was initially done on test images by varying the window sizes of the first and second pass and, where applicable, the third pass. Below a certain threshold, performing PIV resulted in patterns of vector fields that were determined to be insensitive to the choice of window size. Based on this, a constant size of 100 pixels was selected for the first pass, with the second pass set as 50 pixels with an overlap between first-pass windows set to 50 pixels. For PIV on frontal cross-sections from time-lapse images, masks were manually drawn over regions of the epithelium, and a three-pass windowed FFT was performed with the first window size set to the maximum allowable value determined by the algorithm. The resulting vector fields were visually inspected, and any spurious vectors were manually rejected from the analysis. As the maximum allowable window size for a sagittal cross-section was relatively smaller than the spacing between lateral junctions, the strength of the vector field was smoothed within PIVLab to account for the noise. The vector fields were utilized to compute divergence maps and strain rates. To compute the mean divergence within the placode, a circular ROI covering the placode was generated and imported into PIVLab, where the mask was overlaid on the divergence field. To compute the mean divergence of the interfollicular epidermis, placodes were masked out. The values were subsequently integrated within the regions to yield a mean value.
To plot the mean divergences from multiple embryos, the divergence of each placode and its surrounding interfollicular epidermis were aligned according to the first observed peak of negative divergence.
3D vertex model and simulations
The 3D vertex model code was adapted from ref. 53, based on previous work54,55. A multilayered 3D vertex model tissue structure was generated to capture the interactions between the basement membrane, basal cells and suprabasal cells. A subset of the basal cells was labelled as placode cells, with potentially distinct mechanical properties. Each cell in the network was represented as a polyhedron with shared vertices and edges such that the tissue was completely confluent, with no gaps or holes in the tissue. Although the basement membrane was not composed of biological cells, we used vertex cells with a special energy functional, described below, to represent its mechanics. The multilayered structure was initialized from a Voronoi tessellation of a uniform 3D point pattern using the Voro++ library56, and we minimized the vertex model energy function (equation (1) below) before the various cell types were specified. Periodic boundary conditions were maintained at the edges of the simulation domain in all directions. Neighbour exchanges (which are called T1 transitions in 2D, but are generally more complicated in 3D) were allowed via I–H and H–I transitions as described in ref. 54. Each cell was labelled as one of four: suprabasal, basal, placode or basement membrane.
We explored a standard vertex model energy functional in which each cell has a characteristic surface area S0 and volume V0. The preferred surface area is generated from a combination of cell adhesion, which seeks to elongate the surface area between the cells, and contractility, which shrinks these interfaces, while the characteristic volume is a consequence of cell or volume incompressibility. This gives rise to the standard vertex energy functional (E) of the tissue in 3D, , where we sum over the energy contribution from each cell i. The KV and KS terms represent the moduli corresponding to bulk volumetric and interfacial surface tension perturbations, respectively. Although some versions of vertex models only include linear terms in the surface area, we include higher-order terms here, as they are required to observe fluid-like behaviour in the limit of small fluctuations, and we wish to allow for that possibility.
The dynamics of the ith vertex in the network is given by
1 |
where r is the position vector associated with the vertex and μ is the inverse of a frictional drag. The last term captures active fluctuations in tension, by allowing each vertex i in cell j to fluctuate in a random direction given by unit vector at every time step, as Gaussian white noise on a unit sphere:
2 |
where E is the identity tensor, and ξj is the Gaussian white noise with and . The magnitude of the fluctuations is controlled by v0.
Forces are computed on the vertices at each time step, and a simple forward Euler integration scheme is used to integrate equations (1) and (2).
The mechanics of this model—for homogeneous cell types—is largely controlled by a dimensionless shape coefficient, . If cells are able to achieve their preferred shape s0, the tissue will behave as a fluid where cells flow and rearrange. However, if cells cannot achieve their preferred shape due to geometric incompatibility, the tissue will be solid-like and the observed cell shapes will be pinned at a value of s0 close to 5.4 in 3D (refs. 57,58). This rigidity transition has been studied extensively in both 2D and 3D models for both Voronoi and vertex model simulations57–62.
Additionally, to capture heterotypic interactions between different cell types in the stratified epithelium, we also allow cells of different types to regulate the tension between interfaces they share, leading to the following energy functional for heterogeneous tissues:
3 |
Here, σαβ represents the additional interfacial tension between cells of type α and β, and Sij is the surface area joint between cells i and j. This mechanism has been shown to create robust sorting and sharp boundaries between cells of different types63,64. In practice, standard values for 3D vertex model parameters—K of ~1, S0 of ~5.4 (refs. 57,58) and σαβ of ~1 (refs. 63,64)—generate an energy functional where the terms that are linear in surface area Si have negative coefficients. This is not problematic due to the second-order restoring forces proportional to . Therefore, we refer to the magnitude of these coefficients as ‘wetting coefficients’ instead of tensions. Although we use standard parameters for vertex models here (Supplementary Table 1), we have confirmed that our results are similar if we study positive linear coefficients for the surface areas.
We represent the basement membrane as small cells that interact via the same vertex energy functional (equation (3)), with a small s0 that is deep in the solid regime so that the region behaves as an elastic solid. In addition, we explicitly introduce a spring network to the interface between the basement membrane and the surrounding tissue to better mimic the mechanics of the ECM. This takes form as an additional term added to equation (3), where the sum is along all of the edges that are on the interface between the basement membrane and the basal layer:
4 |
where km is a spring stiffness, and l0 is the rest length of the spring along an edge labelled by index e. This additional term creates an additional energetic penalty for interfaces between the placode and basal cells and the basement membrane.
Although this term is nonlinear, we next demonstrate that we can approximate the behaviour of the springs as an extra contribution to the effective interfacial tension σk, when there are small perturbations to the interface between the basement membrane and the basal cells. We examine a simple three-layer system of just basal and suprabasal cells with a spring network between the basal cells and the basement membrane. Once this system reaches a steady state in the presence of active fluctuations, we extract a typical spring network configuration from the vertex model by saving the locations and neighbours of all the vertices. We then extract the spring network only, and volumetrically dilate the network isotropically so that the box size , where ε is the volumetric strain. Next we calculate the total surface area of the stretched spring network and its new energy for various different strains. From the slope of these data, we can extract the effective surface tension for stretching the network, which we call σk. This additional effective tension is directly controlled by the rest length l0. We choose the rest length such that the interface between the basal cells and the basement membrane is twice as stiff as the interfaces between cells, to capture data from atomic force microscopy (AFM) experiments demonstrating that the basement membrane is much stiffer than the cell cortices65.
With this model in hand, we sought to explore whether the isotropic elongation of the placode cells and the invagination phenomenon is a result of the intrinsic forces generating the placode cells or the result of the extrinsic forces applied on the placode cells via cells outside the placode. To this end, we utilized the 3D vertex model to examine both cases.
Model 1—deformations under intrinsic forces
To capture the ability of cells to alter their own intrinsic properties, we investigated the case where the placode cells can modulate their adhesion and interfacial tension with the neighbouring cells. In the vertex model, there are two ways for cells to adjust their interactions with their neighbours—either by changing their preferred surface area, which represents its contractility and homotypic adhesion, or by changing σ (which appears in the last term in equation (3)), representing an additional interfacial tension driven by heterotypic interactions with other cell types. To quantify the relative levels of adhesion and tension at any interface, we define a total wetting coefficient on each interface as
5 |
The third term takes into account the extra effective tension generated by the spring network if the interface is touching the basement membrane. As one can see from equation (5), we have normalized all total wetting coefficients (for the placode lateral interfaces σpp, placode–suprabasal interfaces σps and placode–basement membrane interfaces σpm) by the total wetting coefficient on the lateral interfaces between basal cells, . In general, increasing S0 will cause the placode cells to elongate. However, this will also change the effective wetting coefficient defined by equation (5). For simplicity, we examined the parameter space in terms of total wetting coefficient on each interface. In practice, this means that when we change S0, we also adjust the heterotypic interfacial tension on each interface to ensure the relative ratio of total wetting coefficients across each cell interface is constant. Thus, we performed simulations over a broad range of different values of the wetting coefficients. We found that the morphology of the placode depends on two values: the wetting coefficient between lateral interfaces of placode cells and the ratio of the placode–basement membrane wetting to placode–suprabasal coefficients, .
Model 2—deformation under extrinsic forces
Next, we examine contractile forces such as those generated by the fibroblast ring around the placode cells. To capture this effect in a minimal way, we impose an inward-directed, compressive body force on basal cells outside the placode, which takes the form
6 |
where fr is the maximum magnitude of the external force on the basal cells just outside the placode, and where the force falls off exponentially away from the placode’s centre, rc, over a small, characteristic length scale . Note that a constant placode shape s0 and tensions are maintained between the placode cells in this model. Also note the caveat that no cell divisions or dermal condensate (dermal papilla) structure were incorporated into the model. Details of the parameter selection are provided in Supplementary Table 1.
Computing curvature and cell elongation in simulations and experiments
The curvature of the simulated tissue was determined in a two-step process. A paraboloid was first fitted to the basal vertices shared between the placode cells and those representing the basement membrane. Subsequently, a Gaussian curvature was determined at the deepest point for the fitted surface. In the embryonic tissue whole mounts, we manually identified points on the interface between the placode cells and the membrane in 2D cross-sectional views. These points were fitted to a parabola, assuming that the associated parabola was symmetric along the missing axis, and generated the associated paraboloid. The same procedure as applied for the simulation data was then followed to extract the curvature. To quantify the cell elongation in simulations, the depth of the paraboloid was extracted and combined with the average height of the cells in the basal layer.
Single-cell RNA-sequencing analysis
Raw sequence data for E14.5 mouse skin35 was obtained from NCBI GEO (accession no. GSE122043). The quality of the data was checked using FastQC (v0.11.9). STARsolo aligner (v2.7.7a)66 was used to align sequenced reads to the mouse reference genome (GRCm38), followed by nUMI and barcode counting, constructing the nUMI count matrices. The quality of the sequence alignment was checked using MultiQC (v1.9)67. nUMI matrices were filtered, centred, normalized, clustered, and marker genes extracted using Scanpy (v1.8.1)68. Owing to the strong batch effects observed between the biological replicates, replicates were not merged, but were analysed independently. Data for ‘control replicate 2’ from E14.5 mice are shown. The Leiden algorithm was used to cluster cells at different resolutions between 0.1 and 1 with intervals of 0.1. Resolution 0.8 is displayed. Marker genes were obtained with default parameter of the Scanpy’s find-marker function, which uses the t-test_overestim_var method for differential expression analysis and the Benjamini–Hochberg method for P-value correction. Marker gene lists were automatically selected using rank gene groups (--rgg option) in scanpy functions. Gene Ontology enrichment was performed using a hypergeometric test implemented in gseapy (v0.10.5)69.
AFM
AFM measurements of hair follicle basement membranes were performed on freshly cut 16-µm-thick sagittal cryosections of embryonic skin using a JPK NanoWizard 2 (Bruker Nano) atomic force microscope mounted on an Olympus IX73 inverted fluorescent microscope (Olympus) and operated with JPK SPM Control Software v.5. Cryosections were equilibrated in PBS supplemented with protease inhibitors, and measurements were performed within 20 min of thawing the samples. Triangular non-conductive silicon nitride cantilevers (MLCT, Bruker Daltonics) with a nominal spring constant of 0.07 Nm−1 were used for the nanoindentation experiments, which were performed in combination with optical microscopy to identify the epidermal–dermal boundary. Basement membrane was identified by its characteristic height and stiffness properties by generating high-resolution indentation maps starting from the basal surface of epidermal cells and towards the dermis. For all indentation experiments, forces of up to 3 nN were applied, and the velocities of the cantilever approach and retraction were kept constant at 2 μm s−1, ensuring an indentation depth of 500 nm. All analyses were performed with JPK Data Processing Software (Bruker Nano). Before fitting the Hertz model corrected by the tip geometry to obtain Young’s modulus (Poisson’s ratio of 0.5), the offset was removed from the baseline, the contact point was identified, and cantilever bending was subtracted from all force curves.
Statistics and reproducibility
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad, version 9). Statistical significance was determined by the specific tests indicated in the corresponding figure legends. Only two-tailed tests were used. In all cases where a test for normally distributed data was used, a normal distribution was confirmed with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (α = 0.05). All experiments presented in the Article were repeated in three independent biological replicates at least. Experimental groups were based on mouse phenotypes, and drug treatments were performed on split tissues from the same mouse. No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample sizes; they were based on experience with the methodology and are similar to those reported in previous publications11–15. Data collection and analysis were not performed blinded, as the phenotypes were visibly obvious to the researchers and image analyses were automated. For AFM measurements, outlier identification was carried out to remove rare individual measurements that represented apparent artefacts. No other data points were removed from the experiments.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this Article.
Online content
Any methods, additional references, Nature Portfolio reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at 10.1038/s41556-023-01332-4.
Supplementary information
Supplementary video legends (Videos 1–8).
Parameters for the 3D vertex model (tab 1) and single-cell RNA sequencing DATA (tab 2).
Supplementary Movie 1. Whole embryo live imaging of basal epidermis and corresponding PIV analysis at E14.5 E14.5 whole embryo live imaging of membrane-labelled basal epidermis (left) and the corresponding PIV vectors (green arrows; right panel). Acquisitions were performed with a ×40 air objective at a rate of 10 min frame−1 for 3 h 50 min. Scale bars, 20 µm.
Supplementary Movie 2. Whole embryo live imaging of basal epidermis and corresponding PIV analysis at E15.5. E15.5 whole embryo live imaging of membrane-targeted tomato-labelled basal epidermis (left) and the corresponding PIV vectors (green arrows; right panel). Acquisitions were performed with a ×40 air objective at a rate of 10 min frame−1 for 2 h 30 min. Scale bars, 20 µm.
Supplementary Movie 3. Optical cross-section of whole embryo live imaging of basal epidermis and corresponding PIV analysis at E15.5. Optical side view of E15.5 whole embryo live imaging of membrane-targeted tomato-labelled basal epidermis (top), with corresponding PIV vectors (middle) and strain rate magnitudes (bottom panel). Acquisitions were performed with a ×40 water-immersion objective at a rate of 10 min frame−1 for 50 min. Scale bars, 20 µm. Red crosses indicate mask used to exclude the dermal compartment from the PIV analysis.
Supplementary Movie 4. Laser ablation of E14.5 epidermis indicates tensile stress at the placode–epidermis boundary. E14.5 whole embryo live imaging of membrane-targeted tomato-labelled interfollicular epidermis (top left panel) and placode (top right panel) and PIV vectors showing recoil magnitude and direction after ablation (yellow arrows) with regions of laser ablation highlighted (red circles) in the interfollicular epidermis (bottom left panel) and at the placode-epidermis boundary (bottom right panel). Images were captured every 1 s for 40 s. Ablation done at t = 5 s. Scale bar, 20 µm.
Supplementary Movie 5. Laser ablation of E14.5 epidermis shows lower tension within placode compared to interfollicular epidermis. E14.5 whole embryo live imaging of membrane-targeted tomato-labelled interfollicular epidermis (top left panel) and placode (top right panel) and PIV vectors showing recoil magnitude and direction after ablation (yellow arrows) with regions of laser ablation highlighted (red circles) in the interfollicular epidermis (bottom left panel) and within the placode (bottom right panel). Images were captured every 1 s for 40 s. Ablation done at t = 5 s. Scale bar, 20 µm.
Supplementary Movie 6. Laser ablation of the fibroblast ring surrounding the placode at E15.5. E15.5 whole embryo live imaging of membrane-targeted tomato-labelled placode and fibroblasts surrounding the placode (left panel) with regions of laser ablation highlighted (red rectangle) and PIV vectors showing recoil magnitude and direction after ablation (right panel; yellow arrows). Images were captured every 1 s for 40 s. Ablation done at t = 5 s. Scale bar, 20 mm.
Supplementary Movie 7. Cell divisions in E14.5 epidermis and placodes. E14.5 whole embryo live imaging of Histone2B-mCherry/membrane-EGFP labelled basal epidermis with placode (white circle) and cell divisions (white asterisks) highlighted. Acquisitions were performed with a ×40 water-immersion objective, with a rate of 10 min frame−1 for 80 min. Scale bars, 50 µm.
Supplementary Movie 8. Cell divisions in E15.5 epidermis and placodes. E15.5 whole embryo live imaging of Histone2B-mCherry/membrane-EGFP labelled basal epidermis with placode (white circle) and cell divisions (white asterisks) highlighted. A zoom-in of the placode base (located 8 mm below the basal epidermis z-plane) is shown (left corner). Acquisitions were performed with a ×40 water-immersion objective at a rate of 10 min frame−1 for 80 min. Scale bars, 50 µm.
Source data
One combined file containing all statistical source data with named tabs for each figure/extended data figure item.
Acknowledgements
We thank C. M. Niessen and L. C. Biggs for advice and critical reading of the manuscript, A. M. Luoto, H. Ahola and C. Ortmeier for expert technical assistance, M. M. Nava for help with the AFM analyses, the Max Planck Institute BioOptics and Biomedicum Helsinki Imaging Unit for imaging support and HiLIFE Laboratory Animal Centre Core Facility, University of Helsinki, for support with animal experiments. This work was supported by the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, Helsinki Institute of Life Science, Wihuri Research Institute, European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement 770877 – STEMpop), and the Academy of Finland Center of Excellence BarrierForce (all to S.A.W.). This project received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 101032331 to C.V. Y.A.M. was the recipient of the EMBO Long-Term fellowship ALTF 728-2017 and Human Frontier Science Program fellowship LT000861/2018. M. L. Manning and E.L.-K. acknowledge support from NIH R01HD099031 and the Simons Foundation (grants nos. 454947 and 446222).
Extended data
Author contributions
C.V. designed and performed most of the experiments and analysed data. A.H. and E.L.-K. developed and performed image analyses and vertex model simulations. I.Y. and S.-M.M. performed AFM and imaging experiments. Y.A.M. designed and supervised AFM and compression measurements. B.Y. analysed sequencing data. F.B. analysed imaging data. C.P.-G. and D.M.V. performed and analysed laser ablation experiments. T.Z. generated the initial vertex model code. M. L. Mikkola provided critical mouse models, conceptual advice and designed experiments. M. L. Manning provided conceptual advice, analysed data and designed and supervised the modelling. S.A.W. conceived and supervised the study, designed experiments, analysed data and wrote the paper. All authors commented and edited the manuscript.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Cell Biology thanks George Cotsarelis, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Max Planck Society.
Data availability
Data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request. Previously published single-cell sequencing data from the E14.5 mouse skin data that were re-analysed here are available under accession code GSE122043. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
All scripts and custom code are available at WickstromLab and ZhangTao GitHub.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Ali Hashmi, Irene Ylivinkka, Elizabeth Lawson-Keister.
Contributor Information
M. Lisa Manning, Email: mmanning@syr.edu.
Sara A. Wickström, Email: sara.wickstrom@mpi-muenster.mpg.de
Extended data
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41556-023-01332-4.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41556-023-01332-4.
References
- 1.Collinet C, Lecuit T. Programmed and self-organized flow of information during morphogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2021;22:245–265. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-00318-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lemke SB, Nelson CM. Dynamic changes in epithelial cell packing during tissue morphogenesis. Curr. Biol. 2021;31:R1098–R1110. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.07.078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Biggs LC, Mikkola ML. Early inductive events in ectodermal appendage morphogenesis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2014;25–26:11–21. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schmidt-Ullrich R, Paus R. Molecular principles of hair follicle induction and morphogenesis. Bioessays. 2005;27:247–261. doi: 10.1002/bies.20184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chen D, Jarrell A, Guo C, Lang R, Atit R. Dermal β-catenin activity in response to epidermal Wnt ligands is required for fibroblast proliferation and hair follicle initiation. Development. 2012;139:1522–1533. doi: 10.1242/dev.076463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Andl T, Reddy ST, Gaddapara T, Millar SE. WNT signals are required for the initiation of hair follicle development. Dev. Cell. 2002;2:643–653. doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00167-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Huh SH, et al. Fgf20 governs formation of primary and secondary dermal condensations in developing hair follicles. Genes Dev. 2013;27:450–458. doi: 10.1101/gad.198945.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sick S, Reinker S, Timmer J, Schlake T. WNT and DKK determine hair follicle spacing through a reaction-diffusion mechanism. Science. 2006;314:1447–1450. doi: 10.1126/science.1130088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang Y, et al. Reciprocal requirements for EDA/EDAR/NF-kB and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways in hair follicle induction. Dev. Cell. 2009;17:49–61. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.05.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ahtiainen L, et al. Directional cell migration, but not proliferation, drives hair placode morphogenesis. Dev. Cell. 2014;28:588–602. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Biggs LC, et al. Hair follicle dermal condensation forms via Fgf20 primed cell cycle exit, cell motility, and aggregation. Elife. 2018;7:e36468. doi: 10.7554/eLife.36468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Glover JD, et al. Hierarchical patterning modes orchestrate hair follicle morphogenesis. PLoS Biol. 2017;15:e2002117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2002117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Morita R, et al. Tracing the origin of hair follicle stem cells. Nature. 2021;594:547–552. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03638-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ouspenskaia T, Matos I, Mertz AF, Fiore VF, Fuchs E. WNT-SHH antagonism specifies and expands stem cells prior to niche formation. Cell. 2016;164:156–169. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cetera M, Leybova L, Joyce B, Devenport D. Counter-rotational cell flows drive morphological and cell fate asymmetries in mammalian hair follicles. Nat. Cell Biol. 2018;20:541–552. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0082-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Muzumdar MD, Tasic B, Miyamichi K, Li L, Luo L. A global double-fluorescent Cre reporter mouse. Genesis. 2007;45:593–605. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shivakumar PC, Lenne PF. Laser ablation to probe the epithelial mechanics in Drosophila. Methods Mol. Biol. 2016;1478:241–251. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6371-3_14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Le HQ, et al. Mechanical regulation of transcription controls polycomb-mediated gene silencing during lineage commitment. Nat. Cell Biol. 2016;18:864–875. doi: 10.1038/ncb3387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Driskell RR, Giangreco A, Jensen KB, Mulder KW, Watt FM. Sox2-positive dermal papilla cells specify hair follicle type in mammalian epidermis. Development. 2009;136:2815–2823. doi: 10.1242/dev.038620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rendl M, Lewis L, Fuchs E. Molecular dissection of mesenchymal-epithelial interactions in the hair follicle. PLoS Biol. 2005;3:e331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yu K, et al. Conditional inactivation of FGF receptor 2 reveals an essential role for FGF signaling in the regulation of osteoblast function and bone growth. Development. 2003;130:3063–3074. doi: 10.1242/dev.00491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sumigray KD, Foote HP, Lechler T. Noncentrosomal microtubules and type II myosins potentiate epidermal cell adhesion and barrier formation. J. Cell Biol. 2012;199:513–525. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201206143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Parada C, et al. Mechanical feedback defines organizing centers to drive digit emergence. Dev. Cell. 2022;57:854–866. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2022.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Takahashi I, et al. Compressive force promotes Sox9, type II collagen and aggrecan and inhibits IL-1β expression resulting in chondrogenesis in mouse embryonic limb bud mesenchymal cells. J. Cell Sci. 1998;111:2067–2076. doi: 10.1242/jcs.111.14.2067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Devany J, Sussman DM, Yamamoto T, Manning ML, Gardel ML. Cell cycle-dependent active stress drives epithelia remodeling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2021;118:e1917853118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1917853118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kondo T, Hayashi S. Mitotic cell rounding accelerates epithelial invagination. Nature. 2013;494:125–129. doi: 10.1038/nature11792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ranft J, et al. Fluidization of tissues by cell division and apoptosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:20863–20868. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011086107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Trushko A, et al. Buckling of an epithelium growing under spherical confinement. Dev. Cell. 2020;54:655–668. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.07.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shioi G, et al. A mouse reporter line to conditionally mark nuclei and cell membranes for in vivo live-imaging. Genesis. 2011;49:570–578. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dupont S, Wickstrom SA. Mechanical regulation of chromatin and transcription. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2022;23:624–643. doi: 10.1038/s41576-022-00493-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Watt KI, Harvey KF, Gregorevic P. Regulation of tissue growth by the mammalian Hippo signaling pathway. Front. Physiol. 2017;8:942. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Di Meglio I, et al. Pressure and curvature control of the cell cycle in epithelia growing under spherical confinement. Cell Rep. 2022;40:111227. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhang H, Pasolli HA, Fuchs E. Yes-associated protein (YAP) transcriptional coactivator functions in balancing growth and differentiation in skin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:2270–2275. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1019603108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Fiore VF, et al. Mechanics of a multilayer epithelium instruct tumour architecture and function. Nature. 2020;585:433–439. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2695-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gupta K, et al. Single-cell analysis reveals a hair follicle dermal niche molecular differentiation trajectory that begins prior to morphogenesis. Dev. Cell. 2019;48:17–31. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.11.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Perez-Gonzalez C, et al. Mechanical compartmentalization of the intestinal organoid enables crypt folding and collective cell migration. Nat. Cell Biol. 2021;23:745–757. doi: 10.1038/s41556-021-00699-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Miroshnikova YA, et al. Adhesion forces and cortical tension couple cell proliferation and differentiation to drive epidermal stratification. Nat. Cell Biol. 2018;20:69–80. doi: 10.1038/s41556-017-0005-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Palmquist KH, et al. Reciprocal cell-ECM dynamics generate supracellular fluidity underlying spontaneous follicle patterning. Cell. 2022;185:1960–1973. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.04.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Shyer AE, et al. Emergent cellular self-organization and mechanosensation initiate follicle pattern in the avian skin. Science. 2017;357:811–815. doi: 10.1126/science.aai7868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Barbazan J, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts actively compress cancer cells and modulate mechanotransduction. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:6966. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42382-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ben-Porath I, et al. An embryonic stem cell-like gene expression signature in poorly differentiated aggressive human tumors. Nat. Genet. 2008;40:499–507. doi: 10.1038/ng.127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kim J, et al. A Myc network accounts for similarities between embryonic stem and cancer cell transcription programs. Cell. 2010;143:313–324. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wong DJ, et al. Module map of stem cell genes guides creation of epithelial cancer stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;2:333–344. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.02.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Leon C, et al. Megakaryocyte-restricted MYH9 inactivation dramatically affects hemostasis while preserving platelet aggregation and secretion. Blood. 2007;110:3183–3191. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-03-080184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hafner M, et al. Keratin 14 Cre transgenic mice authenticate keratin 14 as an oocyte-expressed protein. Genesis. 2004;38:176–181. doi: 10.1002/gene.20016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Martin P. Tissue patterning in the developing mouse limb. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 1990;34:323–336. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Marinkovich MP, Lunstrum GP, Burgeson RE. The anchoring filament protein kalinin is synthesized and secreted as a high molecular weight precursor. J. Biol. Chem. 1992;267:17900–17906. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)37127-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sorokin LM, et al. Laminin α4 and integrin α6 are upregulated in regenerating dy/dy skeletal muscle: comparative expression of laminin and integrin isoforms in muscles regenerating after crush injury. Exp. Cell. Res. 2000;256:500–514. doi: 10.1006/excr.2000.4842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kashiwagi M, Kuroki T, Huh N. Specific inhibition of hair follicle formation by epidermal growth factor in an organ culture of developing mouse skin. Dev. Biol. 1997;189:22–32. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1997.8650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chacon-Martinez CA, Klose M, Niemann C, Glauche I, Wickstrom SA. Hair follicle stem cell cultures reveal self-organizing plasticity of stem cells and their progeny. EMBO J. 2017;36:151–164. doi: 10.15252/embj.201694902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Aigouy B, Umetsu D, Eaton S. Segmentation and quantitative analysis of epithelial tissues. Methods Mol. Biol. 2016;1478:227–239. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6371-3_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Schindelin J, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zhang T, Schwarz JM. Topologically-protected interior for three-dimensional confluent cellular collectives. Phys. Rev. Res. 2022;4:043148. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.043148. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Okuda S, Inoue Y, Eiraku M, Sasai Y, Adachi T. Reversible network reconnection model for simulating large deformation in dynamic tissue morphogenesis. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2013;12:627–644. doi: 10.1007/s10237-012-0430-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Honda H, Tanemura M, Nagai T. A three-dimensional vertex dynamics cell model of space-filling polyhedra simulating cell behavior in a cell aggregate. J. Theor. Biol. 2004;226:439–453. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2003.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Rycroft CH. VORO++: a three-dimensional Voronoi cell library in C++ Chaos. 2009;19:041111. doi: 10.1063/1.3215722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Merkel M, Manning ML. A geometrically controlled rigidity transition in a model for confluent 3D tissues. New J. Phys. 2018;20:022002. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/aaaa13. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Zhang, T. & Schwarz, J. M. Boundary-bulk patterning in three-dimensional confluent cellular collectives. (2022).
- 59.Bi D, Lopez JH, Schwarz JM, Manning ML. A density-independent rigidity transition in biological tissues. Nat. Phys. 2015;11:1074–1079. doi: 10.1038/nphys3471. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wang X, et al. Anisotropy links cell shapes to tissue flow during convergent extension. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:13541–13551. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1916418117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Yan L, Bi D. Multicellular rosettes drive fluid-solid transition in epithelial tissues. Phys. Rev. X. 2019;9:011029. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Park JA, et al. Unjamming and cell shape in the asthmatic airway epithelium. Nat. Mater. 2015;14:1040–1048. doi: 10.1038/nmat4357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Sussman DM, Schwarz JM, Marchetti MC, Manning ML. Soft yet sharp interfaces in a vertex model of confluent tissue. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018;120:058001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.058001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Sahu P, et al. Small-scale demixing in confluent biological tissues. Soft Matter. 2020;16:3325–3337. doi: 10.1039/C9SM01084J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Rheinlaender J, et al. Cortical cell stiffness is independent of substrate mechanics. Nat. Mater. 2020;19:1019–1025. doi: 10.1038/s41563-020-0684-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Dobin A, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ewels P, Magnusson M, Lundin S, Kaller M. MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:3047–3048. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Wolf FA, Angerer P, Theis FJ. SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol. 2018;19:15. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1382-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Mootha VK, et al. PGC-1α-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat. Genet. 2003;34:267–273. doi: 10.1038/ng1180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary video legends (Videos 1–8).
Parameters for the 3D vertex model (tab 1) and single-cell RNA sequencing DATA (tab 2).
Supplementary Movie 1. Whole embryo live imaging of basal epidermis and corresponding PIV analysis at E14.5 E14.5 whole embryo live imaging of membrane-labelled basal epidermis (left) and the corresponding PIV vectors (green arrows; right panel). Acquisitions were performed with a ×40 air objective at a rate of 10 min frame−1 for 3 h 50 min. Scale bars, 20 µm.
Supplementary Movie 2. Whole embryo live imaging of basal epidermis and corresponding PIV analysis at E15.5. E15.5 whole embryo live imaging of membrane-targeted tomato-labelled basal epidermis (left) and the corresponding PIV vectors (green arrows; right panel). Acquisitions were performed with a ×40 air objective at a rate of 10 min frame−1 for 2 h 30 min. Scale bars, 20 µm.
Supplementary Movie 3. Optical cross-section of whole embryo live imaging of basal epidermis and corresponding PIV analysis at E15.5. Optical side view of E15.5 whole embryo live imaging of membrane-targeted tomato-labelled basal epidermis (top), with corresponding PIV vectors (middle) and strain rate magnitudes (bottom panel). Acquisitions were performed with a ×40 water-immersion objective at a rate of 10 min frame−1 for 50 min. Scale bars, 20 µm. Red crosses indicate mask used to exclude the dermal compartment from the PIV analysis.
Supplementary Movie 4. Laser ablation of E14.5 epidermis indicates tensile stress at the placode–epidermis boundary. E14.5 whole embryo live imaging of membrane-targeted tomato-labelled interfollicular epidermis (top left panel) and placode (top right panel) and PIV vectors showing recoil magnitude and direction after ablation (yellow arrows) with regions of laser ablation highlighted (red circles) in the interfollicular epidermis (bottom left panel) and at the placode-epidermis boundary (bottom right panel). Images were captured every 1 s for 40 s. Ablation done at t = 5 s. Scale bar, 20 µm.
Supplementary Movie 5. Laser ablation of E14.5 epidermis shows lower tension within placode compared to interfollicular epidermis. E14.5 whole embryo live imaging of membrane-targeted tomato-labelled interfollicular epidermis (top left panel) and placode (top right panel) and PIV vectors showing recoil magnitude and direction after ablation (yellow arrows) with regions of laser ablation highlighted (red circles) in the interfollicular epidermis (bottom left panel) and within the placode (bottom right panel). Images were captured every 1 s for 40 s. Ablation done at t = 5 s. Scale bar, 20 µm.
Supplementary Movie 6. Laser ablation of the fibroblast ring surrounding the placode at E15.5. E15.5 whole embryo live imaging of membrane-targeted tomato-labelled placode and fibroblasts surrounding the placode (left panel) with regions of laser ablation highlighted (red rectangle) and PIV vectors showing recoil magnitude and direction after ablation (right panel; yellow arrows). Images were captured every 1 s for 40 s. Ablation done at t = 5 s. Scale bar, 20 mm.
Supplementary Movie 7. Cell divisions in E14.5 epidermis and placodes. E14.5 whole embryo live imaging of Histone2B-mCherry/membrane-EGFP labelled basal epidermis with placode (white circle) and cell divisions (white asterisks) highlighted. Acquisitions were performed with a ×40 water-immersion objective, with a rate of 10 min frame−1 for 80 min. Scale bars, 50 µm.
Supplementary Movie 8. Cell divisions in E15.5 epidermis and placodes. E15.5 whole embryo live imaging of Histone2B-mCherry/membrane-EGFP labelled basal epidermis with placode (white circle) and cell divisions (white asterisks) highlighted. A zoom-in of the placode base (located 8 mm below the basal epidermis z-plane) is shown (left corner). Acquisitions were performed with a ×40 water-immersion objective at a rate of 10 min frame−1 for 80 min. Scale bars, 50 µm.
One combined file containing all statistical source data with named tabs for each figure/extended data figure item.
Data Availability Statement
Data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request. Previously published single-cell sequencing data from the E14.5 mouse skin data that were re-analysed here are available under accession code GSE122043. Source data are provided with this paper.
All scripts and custom code are available at WickstromLab and ZhangTao GitHub.