Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2024 Jan 8;13(2):e01080-23. doi: 10.1128/mra.01080-23

Metatranscriptomes of two biological soil crust types from the Mojave desert in response to wetting

Thuy M Nguyen 1, Nuttapon Pombubpa 2,2, Marcel Huntemann 3, Alicia Clum 3, Brian Foster 3, Bryce Foster 3, Simon Roux 3, Krishnaveni Palaniappan 3, Neha Varghese 3, Supratim Mukherjee 3, T B K Reddy 3, Chris Daum 3, Alex Copeland 3, I-Min A Chen 3, Natalia N Ivanova 3, Nikos C Kyrpides 3, Miranda Harmon-Smith 3, Emiley A Eloe-Fadrosh 3, Nicole Pietrasiak 4, Jason E Stajich 2, Erik F Y Hom 1,
Editor: Frank J Stewart5
PMCID: PMC10868201  PMID: 38189307

ABSTRACT

We present eight metatranscriptomic datasets of light algal and cyanolichen biological soil crusts from the Mojave Desert in response to wetting. These data will help us understand gene expression patterns in desert biocrust microbial communities after they have been reactivated by the addition of water.

KEYWORDS: biocrust, RNA, transcriptome, wetting, desert, soil

ANNOUNCEMENT

Biological soil crusts comprise diverse microbial communities that carry out vital ecological functions in dryland ecosystems (1). Under dry conditions, biocrust microbes primarily persist in dormancy (24). When water becomes available, they quickly respond by exploiting moisture to repair cell damage and synthesize new biomass (5, 6). Nevertheless, the specific gene expression and metabolic processes underlying these responses remain poorly understood.

We sought to compare two kinds of biocrust commonly found in the Sheephole Valley Wilderness (Mojave Desert): light algal crust (LAC) and cyanolichen crust (CLC). In all, 10 biocrust samples, each measuring 5 cm2, were collected at GPS location 34.1736 N, 115.3888 W. Each sample was placed in a 10 cm petri dish with 2 mL of sterile ultrapure water added on top, covered with a petri dish cover, and incubated at ambient laboratory conditions. After 0.5, 6, 18, 30, and 50 h time points, an entire biocrust sample was transferred and stored at −80°C for subsequent total RNA extraction using a NucleoBond RNA Soil Midi kit (740140.20, Macherey-Nagel, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany). We pursued rRNA depletion of 100 ng of total RNA using a QIAseq FastSelect 5S/16S/23S kit for bacteria and FastSelect rRNA yeast and plant depletion for eukaryotes (335921, 334219, and 334319, QIAGEN, Germantown, MD) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The resulting RNA was reverse transcribed to create first-strand cDNA using a TruSeq Stranded mRNA Library prep kit (20020594, Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA). To synthesize second-strand cDNA, deoxyuridine triphosphate was incorporated in place of deoxythymidine triphosphate to quench the second strand during amplification and achieve strand specificity. Double-stranded cDNA fragments were A-tailed and ligated to JGI dual-indexed Y-adapters, followed by 10 cycles of PCR. The prepared libraries were quantified using KAPA Biosystems’ next-generation sequencing library qPCR kit and run on a LightCycler 480 real-time PCR instrument (Roche Diagnostics Corporation, Indianapolis, IN). NovaSeq sequencing (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA) was performed using NovaSeq XP V1 reagent kits and an S4 flowcell following a 2 × 151 bp indexed run recipe. BBDuk version 38.87 (https://jgi.doe.gov/data-and-tools/bbtools/) was used to remove contaminants, trim adapters from Illumina raw sequencing reads, remove any reads that contained “N” bases, and were shorter than 51 bp. Filtered reads were assembled with MEGAHIT version v1.2.9 (7) and mapped back to the final transcriptome assembly and coverage determined using BBMap version 38.86 (8).

Nearly 95% of reads aligned to ribosomal reference sequences in the SILVA database (9) using BBDuk (version 38.87, default settings), suggesting that experimental rRNA depletion was not effective. Nevertheless, these rRNA reads could be assembled and used to comprehensively survey the taxonomic diversity contained within these biocrusts (10). We obtained at least 25 million mRNA reads per sample, of which 80% could be assembled into contigs; this represents an average transcriptome coverage of ~69× and should be sufficient depth for functional analyses of wetting the reanimation process.

TABLE 1.

Accession numbers and characteristics of metatranscriptomes from two types of biological soil crusts, light algal crust (LAC) and cyanolichen crust (CLC), over the course of a re-wetting experiment (times shown indicate sample harvest time post-wetting; CLC samples at 0.5 and 30 h time points did not generate sufficient high-quality RNA yields for sequencing). All contigs are ≥0.1 kb

Meta- transcriptome NCBI BioSample ID NCBI
BioProject ID
No. of raw reads No. of filtered reads Assembly BioSample
ID
No. of
Contigs
No. of assembled (150 bp) reads Assembly length
(bp)
Transcriptome coverage N50 (bp) Max contig length (KB)
LAC 0.5 h SAMN17674635 PRJNA697426 378,329,084 15,399,682 GKPO00000000 58,795 12,494,595 31,311,788 59.9× 18,350 7.034
LAC 6 h SAMN18245122 PRJNA710733 406,275,950 19,607,874 GKPP00000000 88,036 16,171,069 50,130,842 48.4× 25,380 20.259
LAC 18 h SAMN17675269 PRJNA697427 437,433,136 20,442,408 GKPN00000000 72,020 16,932,941 38,371,519 66.2× 22,289 7.537
LAC 30 h SAMN17675483 PRJNA697428 500,168,512 20,768,548 GKPQ00000000 86,683 17,426,116 50,104,316 52.2× 24,532 14.942
LAC 50 h SAMN17674330 PRJNA697429 670,916,034 38,911,978 GKPR00000000 109,448 32,668,699 61,798,533 79.3× 31,386 18.369
CLC 6 h SAMN17674629 PRJNA697430 590,894,720 32,744,316 GKPS00000000 88,422 27,681,580 50,698,865 81.9× 24,701 23.151
CLC 18 h SAMN18247024 PRJNA710734 528,673,374 28,175,474 GKPT00000000 60,086 23,018,914 35,379,485 97.6× 15,771 19.855
CLC 50 h SAMN18245957 PRJNA710735 682,130,280 29,262,602 GKPU00000000 94,375 23,172,351 51,949,060 66.9× 27,333 27.808

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the BLM Needles CA office for their assistance with permitting at the Sheephole Valley Wilderness. This work was performed and supported in part by the Facilities Integrating Collaborations for User Science (FICUS) program (proposal: https://doi.org/10.46936/fics.proj.2018.50356/60000035) and used resources at the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI) (https://ror.org/04xm1d337) and the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC) (https://ror.org/05v3mvq14), which are DOE Office of Science User Facilities operated under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231; Bureau of Land Management Cooperative Agreement L15AC00153 (NPi) and permit number 6850-CAD0000.06 (NPi and JES); the U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch project CA-R-PPA-211–5062-H to NPo and JES; a Royal Thai Government Scholarship to NPo; and NSF GoLife grant DEB-1541538 and CAREER grant DEB-1846376 to EFYH. JES is a CIFAR fellow in the Fungal Kingdom: Threats and Opportunities program. This is UM’s Center for Biodiversity and Conservation Research Publication No. 39.

Contributor Information

Erik F. Y. Hom, Email: erik@fyhom.com.

Frank J. Stewart, Montana State University, USA

DATA AVAILABILITY

Raw sequencing data and assemblies are accessible at the NCBI using the BioSample and BioProject IDs listed in Table 1. The data are also available from JGI’s genome portal (https://genome.jgi.doe.gov/portal/ProMicSoilCrusts/ProMicSoilCrusts.info.html) or GOLD database (https://gold.jgi.doe.gov/study?id=Gs0142145).

REFERENCES

  • 1. Bowker MA, Maestre FT, Eldridge D, Belnap J, Castillo-Monroy A, Escolar C, Soliveres S. 2014. Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) as a model system in community, landscape and ecosystem ecology. Biodivers Conserv 23:1619–1637. doi: 10.1007/s10531-014-0658-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Rodríguez-Caballero E, Aguilar MÁ, Castilla YC, Chamizo S, Aguilar FJ. 2015. Swelling of biocrusts upon wetting induces changes in surface micro-topography. Soil Biol Biochem 82:107–111. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.12.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Leung PM, Bay SK, Meier DV, Chiri E, Cowan DA, Gillor O, Woebken D, Greening C, Stegen JC. 2020. Energetic basis of microbial growth and persistence in desert ecosystems. mSyst 5:e00495-19. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00495-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Bay SK, Waite DW, Dong X, Gillor O, Chown SL, Hugenholtz P, Greening C. 2021. Chemosynthetic and photosynthetic bacteria contribute differentially to primary production across a steep desert aridity gradient. ISME J 15:3339–3356. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01001-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Karaoz U, Couradeau E, da Rocha UN, Lim H-C, Northen T, Garcia-Pichel F, Brodie EL. 2018. Large blooms of bacillales (firmicutes) underlie the response to wetting of cyanobacterial biocrusts at various stages of maturity. mBio 9:e01366-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01366-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Steven B, Belnap J, Kuske CR. 2018. Chronic physical disturbance substantially alters the response of biological soil crusts to a wetting pulse, as characterized by metatranscriptomic sequencing. Front Microbiol 9:2382. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Li D, Liu CM, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam T-W. 2015. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31:1674–1676. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Bushnell B. 2014. BBMap: a fast, accurate, splice-aware aligner. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory LBNL-7065E. Available from: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1h3515gn [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. 2013. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D590–6. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Nuccio EE, Nguyen NH, Nunes da Rocha U, Mayali X, Bougoure J, Weber PK, Brodie E, Firestone M, Pett-Ridge J. 2021. Community RNA-seq: multi-kingdom responses to living versus decaying roots in soil. ISME Commun 1:72. doi: 10.1038/s43705-021-00059-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Raw sequencing data and assemblies are accessible at the NCBI using the BioSample and BioProject IDs listed in Table 1. The data are also available from JGI’s genome portal (https://genome.jgi.doe.gov/portal/ProMicSoilCrusts/ProMicSoilCrusts.info.html) or GOLD database (https://gold.jgi.doe.gov/study?id=Gs0142145).


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES