Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1968 Jul;43(7):1056–1062. doi: 10.1104/pp.43.7.1056

Relationship of Water Potential to Growth of Leaves 1

John S Boyer 1
PMCID: PMC1086972  PMID: 16656882

Abstract

A thermocouple psychrometer that measures water potentials of intact leaves was used to study the water potentials at which leaves grow. Water potentials and water uptake during recovery from water deficits were measured simultaneously with leaves of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.), papaya (Carica papaya L.), and Abutilon striatum Dickson. Recovery occurred in 2 phases. The first was associated with elimination of water deficits; the second with cell enlargement. The second phase was characterized by a steady rate of water uptake and a relatively constant leaf water potential. Enlargement was 70% irreversible and could be inhibited by puromycin and actinomycin D. During this time, leaves growing with their petioles in contact with pure water remained at a water potential of —1.5 to —2.5 bars regardless of the length of the experiment. It was not possible to obtain growing leaf tissue with a water potential of zero. It was concluded that leaves are not in equilibrium with the potential of the water which is absorbed during growth. The nonequilibrium is brought about by a resistance to water flow which requires a potential difference of 1.5 to 2.5 bars in order to supply water at the rate necessary for maximum growth.

Leaf growth occurred in sunflower only when leaf water potentials were above —3.5 bars. Sunflower leaves therefore require a minimum turgor for enlargement, in this instance equivalent to a turgor of about 6.5 bars. The high water potentials required for growth favored rapid leaf growth at night and reduced growth during the day.

Full text

PDF
1056

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boyer J. S. Effects of Osmotic Water Stress on Metabolic Rates of Cotton Plants with Open Stomata. Plant Physiol. 1965 Mar;40(2):229–234. doi: 10.1104/pp.40.2.229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boyer J. S. Isopiestic technique: measurement of accurate leaf water potentials. Science. 1966 Dec 16;154(3755):1459–1460. doi: 10.1126/science.154.3755.1459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boyer J. S. Leaf water potentials measured with a pressure chamber. Plant Physiol. 1967 Jan;42(1):133–137. doi: 10.1104/pp.42.1.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boyer J. S. Matric potentials of leaves. Plant Physiol. 1967 Feb;42(2):213–217. doi: 10.1104/pp.42.2.213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cleland R. Auxin-induced cell wall loosening in the presence of actinomycin D. Plant Physiol. 1965 Jul;40(4):595–600. doi: 10.1104/pp.40.4.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ehlig C. F. Measurement of Energy Status of Water in Plants With a Thermocouple Psychrometer. Plant Physiol. 1962 May;37(3):288–290. doi: 10.1104/pp.37.3.288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gardner W. R., Nieman R. H. Lower Limit of Water Availability to Plants. Science. 1964 Mar 27;143(3613):1460–1462. doi: 10.1126/science.143.3613.1460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Key J. L., Barnett N. M., Lin C. Y. RNA and protein biosynthesis and the regulation of cell elongation by auxin. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1967 Aug 9;144(1):49–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1967.tb34000.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ordin L., Applewhite T. H., Bonner J. Auxin-Induced Water Uptake by Avena Coleoptile Sections. Plant Physiol. 1956 Jan;31(1):44–53. doi: 10.1104/pp.31.1.44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ordin L., Bonner J. Permeability of Avena Coleoptile Sections to Water Measured by Diffusion of Deuterium Hydroxide. Plant Physiol. 1956 Jan;31(1):53–57. doi: 10.1104/pp.31.1.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Twente J. W., Twente J. A. Regulation of hibernating periods by temperature. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965 Oct;54(4):1044–1051. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wadleigh C. H., Gauch H. G. RATE OF LEAF ELONGATION AS AFFECTED BY THE INTENSITY OF THE TOTAL SOIL MOISTURE STRESS. Plant Physiol. 1948 Oct;23(4):485–495. doi: 10.1104/pp.23.4.485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES