Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Heart Rhythm. 2023 Oct 21;21(1):89–99. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.10.019

Up Digital and Personal: How Heart Digital Twins Can Transform Heart Patient Care

Natalia A Trayanova 1,2, Adityo Prakosa 1
PMCID: PMC10872898  NIHMSID: NIHMS1939739  PMID: 37871809

Abstract

Precision medicine is the vision of healthcare where therapy is tailored to each patient. As part of this vision, digital twinning technology promises to deliver a digital representation of organs or even patients, using tools capable of simulating personal health conditions and predicting patient or disease trajectories based on relationships learned both from data and from biophysics knowledge. Such virtual replicas would update themselves with data from monitoring devices and medical tests and assessments, reflecting dynamically the changes in our health conditions and the responses to treatment. In precision cardiology, the concepts and initial applications of heart digital twins have slowly been gaining popularity and the trust of the clinical community. In this article, we review the advancement in heart digital twinning and its initial translation to the management of heart rhythm disorders.

Keywords: Heart digital twins, arrhythmia, atrial fibrillation, sudden cardiac death risk prediction, ablation

Introduction

Precision medicine is envisioned to provide therapy tailored to each patient. The rapidly increasing ability to capture extensive patient data, coupled with machine learning, a powerful tool for processing massive amounts of data and identifying correlations in it, is a pathway to achieving this vision. A different pathway towards precision medicine is the increasing ability to encode known physics laws and physiology knowledge within mathematical equations and to adapt such mechanistic models to represent the behavior of a specific patient.

The expectation is that it will be highly beneficial to have a digital representation of ourselves. A digital doppelgänger that is tailored to represent our own unique physiology, structure, biophysical processes and even diseases could allow healthcare professionals to simulate our personal medical history and health conditions using relationships learned both from data and from biophysics knowledge. That virtual replica of ourselves would integrate data-driven learning and multiscale physics-based modeling and will update itself, either continuously with data from monitoring devices, or intermittently with data from healthcare provider visits and tests. It will thus reflect the changes in our health conditions due to interactions with the environment, changes in lifestyle, and changes in response to medical interventions These digital twins (DTs) would forecast the trajectory of a patient’s disease, estimate risk of adverse events, and predict treatment response so that the potential outcome would inform treatment decision.

A DT is a virtual replica of a physical object, person, or process that can be used to simulate its behavior. This dynamic model represents both the components of a system and their ongoing interaction. Digital twinning is not a new concept – digital twins have been used to replicate many real-world entities, from equipment lifecycles through to entire manufacturing processes1, as it allows one to oversee the performance of an asset, identify potential faults, and make well-informed decisions about maintenance and global performance. In health-care, the DT represents the vision of a virtual tool that integrates dynamically clinical and/or tracked data acquired over time for an individual and predicts behavior using comprehensive multi-scale mechanistic simulations based on physiology knowledge and physics laws.

In precision cardiology, over the last decade, the concepts and initial applications of heart DTs have slowly been gaining popularity and the trust of the clinical community. Pathways forward have been charted2,3, and current developments47 have been assessed. Fig. 1 presents a flowchart of the clinical workflow using heart DTs, and their envisioned applications for clinical decision support in diagnosis and prognostication of the patient’s disease trajectory, as well as for guiding treatment that is optimized by considering the patient’s response to the potential therapy.

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

Flowchart of the clinical workflow using heart DTs.

One of the most advanced heart DT applications is in the management of heart rhythm disorders, with major developments in the field reviewed in this article. The present article is the review of the body of work of each year’s recipient of the Gordon Moe lectureship presented by the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society. Dr. Trayanova was this year’s recipient, and this review article summarizes her work and that of her team at Johns Hopkins University on the development and application of heart DTs for the management of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias.

Digital Twins for Atrial Arrhythmia Management

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common heart rhythm disorder, having a prevalence of 1–2% worldwide. It is associated with embolic stroke, heart failure, and cardiovascular hospitalization and death8. AF patients have increased rates of cognitive impairment and a diminished quality of life9. The growing burden of AF, and the high rate of healthcare expenditures associated with its management have led to a large body of basic and clinical research aimed at uncovering both a permanent cure of AF and an improved AF management strategy. Computational modeling of the atria and personalized atrial DT technologies have been and continue to be an integral part of these developments.

An important focal point in these efforts, including ours, has been the representation, in personalized DTs, of the fibrotic remodeling that takes place in the atria of (ageing) patients, and particularly in those experiencing the persistent form of AF (PsAF). In these patients, the mechanisms giving rise to AF shift from electrical abnormality in the pulmonary veins (PVs) to re-circulating electrical waves (reentries) perpetuated by the fibrotic substrate. Personalized DT technologies have provided understanding of how fibrotic remodeling results in the turbulent propagation associated with AF and have suggested management strategies, some of which have been tested in prospective studies. Prior to this review, we and others have reviewed different aspects of computational modeling of the human atria6,1012.

In developing a personalized atrial DT that represents the patient-specific fibrosis remodeling, the process commences with the assessment of the patient’s clinical contrast enhanced (late gadolinium enhancement, LGE)-MRI scan, typically a 3D scan of higher resolution to resolve the thin atrial walls13,14. In addition to providing information about atrial shape, MRI imparts excellent heart tissue characterization, as gadolinium-based contrast agents accumulate in scar and fibrotic tissue15. Areas on LGE-MRI correspond to areas of scar and fibrotic remodeling, with the high image intensity corresponding to deep scar. Reconstruction of atrial geometry requires segmenting the chambers and the remodeled tissue from the LGE-MRI; the study of McDowell et al16 was the first to reconstruct a personalized DT incorporating fibrotic remodeling. The threshold for fibrosis segmentation is not well established and remains controversial. We have used a version of the image intensity ratio (IIR) since it uses ratiometric values instead of raw voxel intensities. Our team also reconstructed, for the first time, the personalized fibrotic remodeling in the right atria (RA) of patients; we adapted the IIR metric for RA fibrosis17. Fig.2A presents a number of reconstructed bi-atrial models of PsAF patients with fibrosis. Additionally, atrial DTs incorporate fiber orientations to ensure realistic conduction patterns. Reconstruction of personalized atrial DTs in our translational research has involved the use of atlas human fiber orientations18, acquired from explanted human hearts using diffusion-tensor MRI (Fig.2B), which visualizes the fiber tracts in the myocardium. These are then assigned in the patient-specific geometric model with the use of a universal atrial coordinate system19.

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

Developing personalized atrial DTs. A. Reconstructed bi-atrial geometries from 6 PsAF patients. Fibrosis distribution is in green. B. Human fiber orientation acquired from explanted human hearts and used as fiber atlas for DT construction. Image modified with permission from68.

In our translational work aimed at improving AF management, personalization of atrial DTs was done predominantly based on the patient-specific disease remodeling, where distinct electrophysiological (EP) properties are assigned in different regions based on image intensity. This has been a deliberate choice, as our intention has been strategically, down the road, to develop non-invasive technologies for the prognostication and treatment of AF. Several research groups have instead chosen to personalize the EP properties from invasive intra-procedural measurements20,21. Instead, we developed, based on clinical measurements in AF patients, a set of baseline EP properties22 which could be modified, when needed, to explore different arrhythmogenic mechanisms. These included, but were not limited to, exploration of the effect of potential myocyte-fibroblast interactions23,24, and arrhythmogenesis related to calcium-driven alternans in AF25,26. For instance, in the latter study, we found that elevated Ca2+ alternans propensity due to decreased ryanodine receptor inactivation, and development of repolarization alternans at slower heart rates, resulted in increased ectopy-induced arrhythmia vulnerability, complexity, and persistence due to increased repolarization heterogeneity and wavebreak.

Our atrial modeling studies strongly support the notion that that the extent and distribution of atrial fibrosis are critical determinants of AF initiation, maintenance, and re-entrant driver dynamics during AF. Although presence of a certain amount of fibrosis is sufficient for initiation of AF in simulations, we found that patient-specific fibrosis distribution determines re-entrant driver dynamics27. The study of Zahid et al.28 took this understanding further, demonstrating, in a cohort of 20 patients, that reentrant drivers induced in the fibrotic substrate by rapid pacing persist only in areas with highly specific spatial patterns of fibrosis. The study was the first to construct atrial digital twins of both LA and RA. Fibrotic spatial patterns were characterized by calculating, from the 3D LGE-MRI images, maps of fibrosis density and fibrosis entropy. Local fibrosis density indicates the proportion of fibrotic elements among all elements surrounding the given location, while local fibrotic entropy quantifies the degree of disorganization between fibrotic and non-fibrotic elements in the local neighborhood. All the reentrant drivers that could be induced in each remodeled substrate persisted in fibrotic boundaries zone characterized by high fibrotic density and fibrotic entropy. Fibrotic patterns with such specific regional fibrosis metrics correspond to atrial areas with a high degree of intermingling between fibrotic and non-fibrotic tissue. The findings of this atrial DT study were subsequently validated29 with clinical data (electrocardiographic imaging, ECGI).

Potentially the most transformative clinical application of atrial digital twinning is the development of personalized PsAF ablation strategies, tailored to each patient’s unique (fibrotic) atrial substrate. While pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI), the electrical isolation of PV arrhythmia triggers, is the standard of care for patients with symptomatic AF30,31, in PsAF patients with atrial fibrosis, AF recurrence rates after PVI are high32,33, resulting in freedom from AF of only 40–50% one-year post-procedure. The presence of regions of fibrosis that extend beyond the traditional wide-area PVI and have arrhythmogenic propensity could explain PVI’s ineffectiveness in patients with atrial fibrosis. Establishing non-invasively whether PVI will result in subsequent AF recurrence in a patient with atrial fibrosis, and if so, determining prior to the ablation procedure the custom-tailored extra-PVI ablation targets that will deliver long-term freedom from AF could result in dramatically improved treatment efficacy and reduce the need for repeated ablations. In this, atrial digital twinning has found it calling.

McDowell et al.27 was the first study to demonstrate, as a proof-of-concept, that LA digital twins reconstructed from the patient’s LGE-MRI scans (n=4) can be used to predict ablation targets in the fibrotic substrate. The targets were the locations in the fibrotic substrate where reentrant drivers (rotors) form following rapid pacing from locations in the substrate. Executing this virtual ablation strategy in the LA digital twins rendered the atrial model non-inducible for reentry. Having demonstrated the potential utility of atrial DTs in predicting ablation targets, we also assessed whether the predicted targets would be affected by different baseline cellular EP properties. In a sensitivity analysis34, we varied atrial action potential duration (APD) or conduction velocity to address this question. These changes resulted in different likelihoods that a location in the fibrotic substrate would sustain a re-entrant driver. However, Hakim et al.35 demonstrated that this uncertainty was mitigated by first executing re-entrant driver ablations followed by repeat inducibility tests to evaluate the occurrence of any emergent re-entrant drivers post-ablation. In other words, depending on the baseline EP properties in the patient’s atria, locations in the fibrotic substrate will give rise to rotors either on the first inducibility test, or on the subsequent inducibility tests probing for emergent rotors post-initial ablation, with the sequence determined by the patient’s EP properties. Thus, as long as both initial and emergent drivers were captured, the digital twin with the baseline AF EP properties would be a useful clinical tool to provide personalized guidance in AF ablation.

Boyle et al. pioneered a prospective ablation study for patients with persistent AF and fibrosis entirely guided by personalized atrial DTs15. In this landmark study termed OPTIMA (OPtimal Target Identification via Modelling of Arrhythmogenesis), 10 patients were enrolled. The locations of reentrant drivers were determined following a reentrant driver inducibility test. These locations in the DT atrial substrate were then ablated virtually. In essence, the OPTIMA DT approach for guiding AF ablation is a targeted substrate ablation approach, where locations in the fibrotic substrate capable of sustaining reentrant drivers are discerned and ablated to eliminate that capability. Following ablation, the DT inducibility test was repeated, and if new locations arouse capable of sustaining reentrant activity in the new (fibrosis plus initial ablation) substrate, then these emergent activities were also targeted with ablation, until a set of optimal ablation targets was found that results in a complete arrhythmia non-inducibility of the substrate. The proposed ablation targets were then used to steer patient treatment during the procedure, eliminating not only the clinically manifested AF but also any potential emergent AF drivers. Fig.3 shows the OPTIMA flowchart, illustrated with one of the patients in the prospective clinical study. While very successful, the efficacy of this study is now being tested in an FDA-approved randomized controlled clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04101539). Atrial DTs have also been used to determine how to ablate patients with atypical flutter36. The use of atrial DT-driven ablation has also been compared to other approaches, such as focal impulse and rotor mapping (FIRM) or ECGI3739.

Figure 3:

Figure 3:

Flowchart of the OPTIMA approach using personalized heart DTs. The individual steps are illustrated with the DTs of one of the participants in the study. LGE-MRI scans were used to construct the patient’s bi-atrial geometry and fibrosis distribution. Following a baseline inducibility test, one location at the left atrial anterior septal wall was determined to have a high likelihood of sustaining a rotor (bottom left). Following virtual ablations targeting the detected location, a repeat inducibility test identified an emergent rotor location at the right atrial posterior region (bottom middle), which was then ablated. The final optimal ablation targets resulted in a complete arrhythmia non-inducibility of the substrate. The proposed targets were imported to the CARTO system to guide ablation procedure.

Inadequate modification of the atrial rotor-sustaining fibrotic substrate may explain AF recurrence following failed PVI. In a retrospective longitudinal study of 12 AF patients with pre- and post-ablation LGE-MRIs, the study by Ali et al.40 aimed to evaluate, using LA atrial digital twins, the post-ablation changes in the arrhythmogenic substrate, and to establish whether failure of AF ablation resulted from inadequate termination of pre-ablation rotors or emergence of new rotors post-ablation. The research demonstrated that recurrent AF after PVI in the fibrotic atria may be attributable to both the existence of locations in the substrate capable of sustaining rotors that were not modified/eliminated by ablation, and the emergence of new rotor-sustaining locations following ablation. The same levels of fibrosis entropy and density that underlie propensity to rotor formation in the pre-ablation substrate hold true for the post-ablation substrate as well, providing a uniform framework to understand fibrosis-induced arrhythmogenesis. These conclusions led to the development of a strategy to predict, pre-procedure before PVI, which patients are most likely to experience AF recurrence after PVI. To achieve that, Shade at al.41 combined LGE-based atrial digital twinning with machine learning in a proof-of-concept study of 32 patients. The algorithm used an input results of rotor induction simulations in the fibrotic substrate with imaging features derived from pre-PVI LGEs (Fig.4). The ML classifier to predict the probability of AF recurrence post-PVI achieved average validation sensitivity and specificity of 82% and 89%, respectively, and a validation area under the curve of 0.82. The study presented a highly generalizable AF recurrence predictor, despite the small training data set.

Figure 4:

Figure 4:

Predicting AF recurrence post-PVI by using the results of simulations with atrial DTs, and training a machine learning classifier to predict, pre-procedurally, clinical outcome. Features in DT simulation results can be extracted in 2 ways, deductively and inductively. Modified with permission from41.

With the further development of the DT technology, the hope is that outstanding questions pertaining to AF management will also be addressed. These include why some patients with fibrosis never develop AF, whether PVI will be the required strategy if ablation lesions in the fibrotic substrate eliminate its ability to sustain reentrant activity, or what are the important characteristics of the substrate that render it arrhythmogenic in patients with AF.

Digital Twins for Ventricular Arrhythmia Management

Personalized ventricular DTs have also made significant contributions towards being part of the clinical management of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). Such DTs have been constructed and utilized for a number of cardiomyopathies, both ischemic and non-ischemic. Construction of ventricular DTs follows the general steps as outlined for atrial DTs, with the difference that in addition to using LGE-MRI for model construction, other imaging modalities have been also used, often developing personalized DT by fusing the different clinical images to represent different types of structural remodeling and functional remodeling (such as for instance, inflammation). Fig. 5A shows ventricular DTs reconstructed from various imaging modalities. Frequently, before being used to suggest clinically-relevant decisions, the personalized DTs have been validated with clinical data (Fig. 5B). Below we review two major clinical applications of computational modeling, the prediction of SCD due to arrhythmias in various diseases, and the use of computational modeling to advance and ultimately provide guidance in arrhythmia treatment by catheter ablation.

Figure 5:

Figure 5:

A. Personalized ventricular DTs with the corresponding predicted VTs. Shown here are the DTs of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (upper box) reconstructed from LGE-MRI (top)61 and CT (bottom)63 scans. The lower box shows the DT of a patient with sarcoidosis which incorporates the region with inflammation detected from PET scan (top). Modified with permission from69. Post-contrast T1 mapping scans were used to personalize the detection of diffuse and dense fibrosis in the DT reconstruction of a patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (bottom of lower box). Modified from54 (permission exempt per https://elifesciences.org/terms). B. Validation of the personalized DT of a patient with sarcoidosis with clinical ablation data. Two in silico VTs were induced in the DT (white arrows). The red spheres show the location of the clinical ablation lesions recorded in the patient electro-anatomical mapping (EAM) data during the procedure. The co-registered EAM data to the DT show the correspondence between the predicted VTs and the clinical ablation lesions. Modified from56 (permission exempt per https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Personalized ventricular DTs studies have been compelled to address the issue of predicting risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). It is an important clinical issue, as worldwide, the prevalence of SCD already high, is on the rise; it results predominantly from VAs, particularly among patients with prior heart disease. Accurate SCD risk assessment is thus crucial, to enable primary prevention of SCD via the deployment of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD)42. Currently, the decision is based on a single clinical metric, which is not sensitive43. Thus, many patients receive ICDs without deriving any health benefit44 (90–95% of implanted ICDs are never utilized), whereas others are not protected, dying suddenly in the prime of their life. The conventional approach to SCD risk stratification has been to search for bio-markers that correlate with increased SCD risk. However, thus far, no biomarkers have enabled an accurate SCD risk assessment. Thus, inadequate SCD risk assessment poses a large public health and socioeconomic burden, and remains a major unmet clinical need.

The study by Arevalo et al.45 demonstrated the first utilization of DTs of a cohort of ischemic cardiomyopathy patients (n=41) to determine the patients’ propensity to develop infarct-related ventricular arrhythmias and SCD. All patients were with reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF<35%), this deemed of high SCD risk, and all underwent ICD deployment. The patient’s risk was assessed based on whether arrhythmia was inducible from any of the numerous pacing sites tested in the DT; if it did, the patient was deemed at high risk. The comparison of the predictive capabilities of this DT approach with those of other clinical risk assessment metrics, including LVEF and other imaging variables, revealed that only the outcome of the heart DT was significantly associated with arrhythmic risk in this patient cohort. The study demonstrated that DTs of patients with prior infarction can be used to determine which patients should have a prophylactic ICD implantation for primary prevention. Additionally, in a small proof-of-concept study, SCD risk was investigated in a small cohort of myocardial infarction patients with preserved ejection fraction with the DT results matching clinical outcome46. A more complex approach to the development of DTs of patients with prior infarcts was recently presented47, where the patient heart DT also incorporated the distribution of penetrating adipose tissue (fat), which develops in infarcts >3 years old. This was a two-center prospective clinical-computational study, where enrolled patients underwent both LGE-MRI and CT scans (n=24). The penetrating adipose tissue (inFAT) was reconstructed in the DT from the patient computed tomography (CT) scans. The hybrid CT-MRI heart DTs, combined with EAM data, revealed that for these infarcts, inFAT exhibits greater pro-arrhythmic electrophysiological abnormalities than scar, and that it is the primary driver of substrate arrhythmogenic propensity. Subsequent clinical studies confirmed these DT predictions4850. Finally, in addition to further developing heart DTs that are based on mechanistic considerations, recently, new deep learning on multi-modality data has been proposed51. The deep learning analysis (termed SSCAR) combined learning on raw patient LGE-MRI scans and clinical covariates of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and was imbedded in survival analysis to predict time to SCD over a period of 10 years; it performed well on the external validation dataset demonstrating generalizability. Algorithms like SSCAR are paving the way for multi-modal prediction of patient outcome, but they will become particularly powerful when combined with DT for interpretability and mechanistic insight.

For SCD risk prediction in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathies, several heart DT studies have demonstrated the clinical utility of the approach. The first two applications of personalized DTs in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy were in pediatric patients. The first assessed VA risk in acute pediatric myocarditis52. In the second study, DTs were constructed from patients with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot53 the childhood surgical intervention in these patients led to potential arrhythmogenic scarring in the heart. DT risk assessments in rToF predicted high risk, later validated by clinical outcome, in those patients where an ECG-based clinical algorithm predicted low risk. In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), a common genetic disease characterized by thickening of heart muscle, high SCD risk arises from the proliferation of fibrosis in the heart. The study by O’Hara et al.54 used DT technology to analyze how disease-specific remodeling promotes arrhythmogenesis and to develop a personalized strategy to forecast risk of arrhythmias in these patients (n=26). The authors combined LGE-MRI and T1 mapping data to construct fusion DTs that represented the patient-specific distribution not only of dense scar but also of diffuse fibrosis, the latter reconstructed from the T1 maps.55 Analysis demonstrated that the presence of diffuse fibrosis, which is rarely assessed in these patients, increases VA propensity. In forecasting future arrhythmic events in these patients, the DT approach significantly outperformed current clinical risk predictors; both the ACCF/AHA and the ESC risk models offered prognoses that were inferior in accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity than the LGE-T1 DT prognosis. Another non-ischemic cardiomyopathy associated with high SCD risk and difficult risk prediction is cardiac sarcoidosis. Shade et al.56 developed a two-step prediction approach, combining digital twinning with machine learning in a study of 45 patients. The patient’s arrhythmogenic propensity was assessed using a novel hybrid DT, reconstructed from the fusion of LGE-MRI and positron-emission tomography (PET) scans. The results from DT simulation were fed, together with a set of clinical biomarkers, into a supervised classifier – and the technology well outperformed current clinical decision making.

Finally, a genotype-specific heart DT (Geno-DT) approach was recently developed to investigate the role of pathophysiological remodeling in sustaining arrhythmia and to predict the arrhythmia circuits in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) patients of different genotypes57. This approach integrated the patient’s disease-induced structural remodeling and genotype-specific cellular electrophysiology properties and revealed that the underlying arrhythmia mechanisms differ among ARVC genotypes. In a retrospective study of 16 ARVC patients with two genotypes: plakophilin-2 (PKP2, n = 8) and gene-elusive (GE, n = 8), Zhang et al found that Geno-DT accurately and non-invasively predicted the ventricular tachycardia (VT) circuit locations for both genotypes with very high accuracy, sensitivity and specificity in both the for GE and PKP2 patient groups, when compared to VT circuit locations identified during clinical EP studies. Importantly, the results revealed that the underlying VT mechanisms differ among ARVC genotypes: in GE patients, fibrotic remodeling is the primary contributor to VT circuits, while in PKP2 patients, slowed conduction velocity and altered restitution properties of cardiac tissue, in addition to the structural substrate, are directly responsible for the formation of VT circuits. Fig. 6 shows an interesting result: when the genotype in the DTs was mismatched, the VT circuits could no longer be predicted correctly. With its incorporation of genetic EP information, Geno-DT is the latest development in heart DT applications. The Geno-DT approach demonstrated the potential to augment therapeutic precision in the clinical setting and lead to more personalized treatment strategies in ARVC.

Figure 6:

Figure 6:

VT prediction using genotype-specific heart DT (Geno-DT) of ARVC patients. Reconstructed DTs from 2 patients of Gene Elusive and PKP2 genotypes along with the simulated VTs with A, genotype-matched condition, and B, genotype-mismatched condition. The mismatched condition led to incorrect prediction of the VT circuits. Modified from57 (permission exempt per https://elifesciences.org/terms).

Like the management of AF, catheter ablation plays a major role in the contemporary management of VAs. Eliminating VA with ablation has achieved, however, modest success, 50–88%58,59. Similar to AF ablation, a number of patients, for whom the initial procedure fails, are repeatedly ablated, further extending the adverse structural remodeling in the ventricles. Discovering new strategies that result in accurate identification of the optimal ablation targets for VA in patients with different heart diseases, and which also deliver long-term freedom from VA, is a quest of paramount clinical significance. Personalized DT technology has made major strides in improving ablation precision by providing noninvasive localization of ablation targets. A study employing DTs from 13 post-infarct patients who underwent ablation showed that ablation targets from DTs were consistent with the targets executed in the clinic60. The landmark study by Prakosa et al.61 was demonstrated for the first time the clinical utility of personalized DTs in determining noninvasively the optimal (i.e., minimum lesion size) VT ablation targets and guiding the clinical procedure of VT ablation. The capability of the approach to was first assessed in a retrospective study (n = 21), where predicted targets we compared to the clinical. This included patients where image construction was carried out from clinical images with device artifacts. Furthermore, the feasibility of using DTs to guide clinical VT ablation was demonstrated in a proof-of-concept prospective study (n = 5), in two clinical centers (Fig.7A). This work highlighted the potential for DT technology to impact the clinical management of VAs. The sensitivity of DT ablation targets to EP parameter variability has also been assessed62. Using DTs based on the CT scans of patients has also been shown, in a retrospective cohort of 29 post-infarct patients, to be able to provide guidance in ventricular ablation63. The DTs predicted not only the targets on index ablation, but also the ablation targets on a redo procedure several years later (Fig.7B). Overall, the predicted ablation targets by the heart DTs consistently encompassed much less lesion volumes. Since CT is accessible across a broad range of clinical centers, DTs could be readily deployed prospectively to improve ventricular ablation.

Figure 7:

Figure 7:

DTs guiding ventricular ablation. A. Ablation in a prospective patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy guided by MRI-based DT. Shown are the two predicted VT circuits, and intra-procedural EAM (CARTO) with the predicted (purple) and actual (red) lesions. Modified from61 (Permission exempt per https://www.nature.com/nature-research/reprints-and-permissions/permissions-requests). B. Using a CT-based DT in a post-infarction patient with infiltrating fat to predict VT circuits (left; the inset presents detail of activation; white arrows denote reentrant pathway; zigzag arrows denote conduction channels) and ablation targets retrospectively, where predicted ablation targets and clinical ablation lesions co-localize in a patient who underwent redo ablation ≈4 y after the index procedure. Modified with permission from63.

DTs have also been used to improve ablation by better understanding VT circuit morphology. Sung et al.64 demonstrated that inclusion of repolarization gradients, both transmural and apico-basal, altered VT circuit morphologies, with minimal change of the ablation targets. DT simulations of VT circuits have also been combined with automated ECG-based localization algorithm to predict VT exit sites65, highlighting a potential synergy between the two methodologies. A recent study further developed and validated a technique called reentry vulnerability index, demonstrating that the technique allows localization of ablation targets66. In the clinic, multiple wavefront pacing (MWP) and decremental pacing (DP) are two EAM strategies that have emerged to characterize58,59 the VT substrate and determine ablation targets. A recent DT study on 48 patients assessed how well MWP, DP, as well as other techniques used in clinical studies improve identification of electrophysiological abnormalities at critical VT sites67. The study found that EAM with MWP is more advantageous for characterization of substrate for ablation in hearts with less remodeling.

Concluding Remarks

The developments and the examples of applications of heart DTs in arrhythmia management by our team presented in this review highlight the significant advancements that cardiac computational modeling has made in bringing such tools closer to the patient point of care. Heart DTs could potentially become a disruptive approach, fully embodying the expectations of precision medicine in cardiology, as these virtual tools leverage robust physics and physiology - based mechanistic insights, are capable of encoding patho-physiological complexity across multiple spatial scales, and can be continuously updated with the individual patient’s clinical and lifestyle data.

The pathway to accelerate the clinical impact of heart DTs is to continuously work on increasing the trust in the technology among researchers, clinicians, and healthcare professionals, to emphasize its benefits to patients, and to educate the society at large. An important aspect in this endeavor is to always recognize and account for the limitations of the technology. DTs of organs and patients will likely never represent all aspects of physiological reality. Thus focus should be steadily on DT performance and the resulting patient outcome, both becoming increasingly important. To cite George Box, “all models are wrong, some are useful” – it is this usefulness that we will strive to enhance in the years to come.

Funding:

NAT received support from the National Institutes of Health (R01HL166759, R01HL142496).

List of Abbreviations:

3D

three-dimensional

ACCF

American College of Cardiology Foundation

AF

atrial fibrillation

AHA

American Heart Association

APD

action potential duration

ARVC

arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

CT

computed tomography

DP

decremental pacing

DT

digital twin

EAM

electroanatomic map

ECGI

electrocardiographic imaging

EP

electrophysiology

ESC

European Society of Cardiology

FDA

Food and Drug Administration

FIRM

focal impulse and rotor mapping

Geno-DT

genotype-specific heart digital twin

GE

gene-elusive

HCM

hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

ICD

implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

inFAT

penetrating adipose tissue

IIR

image intensity ratio

LA

left atria

LGE

late gadolinium enhancement

LVEF

left ventricular ejection fraction

MRI

magnetic resonance imaging

MWP

multiple wavefront pacing

OPTIMA

optimal target identification via modelling of arrhythmogenesis

PET

positron-emission tomography

PKP2

plakophilin-2

PsAF

persistent form of atrial fibrillation

PV

pulmonary vein

PVI

pulmonary vein isolation

RA

right atria

rToF

repaired tetralogy of fallot

SCD

sudden cardiac death

SSCAR

survival study of cardiac arrhythmia risk

VA

ventricular arrhythmia

VT

ventricular tachycardia

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  • 1.Tao F, Cheng J, Qi Q, Zhang M, Zhang H, Sui F. Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2018;94(9–12):3563–3576. doi: 10.1007/s00170-017-0233-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Corral-Acero J, Margara F, Marciniak M, et al. The “Digital Twin” to enable the vision of precision cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(48):4556–4564B. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Johnson KW, Shameer K, Glicksberg BS, et al. Enabling Precision Cardiology Through Multiscale Biology and Systems Medicine. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2017;2(3):311–327. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2016.11.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pathmanathan P, Gray RA. Ensuring reliability of safety-critical clinical applications of computational cardiac models. Front Physiol. 2013;4:358. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Winslow RL, Trayanova N, Geman D, Miller MI. Computational Medicine: Translating Models to Clinical Care. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(158):158rv11 LP–158rv11. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Niederer SA, Lumens J, Trayanova NA. Computational models in cardiology. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2019;16(2):100–111. doi: 10.1038/s41569-018-0104-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang Y, Barocas VH, Berceli SA, et al. Multi-scale Modeling of the Cardiovascular System: Disease Development, Progression, and Clinical Intervention. Ann Biomed Eng. 2016;44(9):2642–2660. doi: 10.1007/s10439-016-1628-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chen LY, Sotoodehnia N, Bůžková P, et al. Atrial fibrillation and the risk of sudden cardiac death: The atherosclerosis risk in communities study and cardiovascular health study. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(1):29–35. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mark DB, Anstrom KJ, Sheng S, et al. Effect of Catheter Ablation vs Medical Therapy on Quality of Life among Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: The CABANA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association. 2019;321(13):1275–1285. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0692 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Trayanova NA. Mathematical approaches to understanding and imaging atrial fibrillation: Significance for mechanisms and management. Circ Res. 2014;114(9):1516–1531. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Aronis KN, Ali R, Trayanova NA. The role of personalized atrial modeling in understanding atrial fibrillation mechanisms and improving treatment. Int J Cardiol. 2019;287:139–147. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.01.096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Heijman J, Sutanto H, Crijns HJGM, Nattel S, Trayanova NA. Computational models of atrial fibrillation: Achievements, challenges, and perspectives for improving clinical care. Cardiovasc Res. 2021;117(7):1682–1699. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvab138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Oakes RS, Badger TJ, Kholmovski EG, et al. Detection and quantification of left atrial structural remodeling with delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2009;119(13):1758–1767. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.811877 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fukumoto K, Habibi M, Ipek EG, et al. Association of Left Atrial Local Conduction Velocity with Late Gadolinium Enhancement on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9(3):1–6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.002897 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Habibi M, Chrispin J, Spragg DD, et al. Utility of Cardiac MRI in Atrial Fibrillation Management. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2020;12(2):131–139. doi: 10.1016/j.ccep.2020.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McDowell KS, Vadakkumpadan F, Blake R, et al. Methodology for patient-specific modeling of atrial fibrosis as a substrate for atrial fibrillation. J Electrocardiol. 2012;45(6):640–645. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2012.08.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Boyle PM, Zghaib T, Zahid S, et al. Computationally guided personalized targeted ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation. Nat Biomed Eng. 2019;3(11):870–879. doi: 10.1038/s41551-019-0437-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Roney CH, Bendikas R, Pashakhanloo F, et al. Constructing a Human Atrial Fibre Atlas. Ann Biomed Eng. 2021;49(1):233–250. doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02525-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Roney CH, Pashaei A, Meo M, et al. Universal atrial coordinates applied to visualisation, registration and construction of patient specific meshes. Med Image Anal. 2019;55:65–75. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2019.04.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Corrado C, Whitaker J, Chubb H, et al. Personalized models of human atrial electrophysiology derived from endocardial electrograms. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2017;64(4):735–742. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2016.2574619 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lubrecht JM, Grandits T, Gharaviri A, et al. Automatic reconstruction of the left atrium activation from sparse intracardiac contact recordings by inverse estimate of fibre structure and anisotropic conduction in a patient-specific model. Europace. 2021;23:I63–I70. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa392 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Krummen DE, Bayer JD, Ho J, et al. Mechanisms of human atrial fibrillation initiation clinical and computational studies of repolarization restitution and activation latency. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012;5(6):1149–1159. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.969022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ashihara T, Haraguchi R, Nakazawa K, et al. The role of fibroblasts in complex fractionated electrograms during persistent/permanent atrial fibrillation: Implications for electrogram-based catheter ablation. Circ Res. 2012;110(2):275–284. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.255026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.McDowell KS, Vadakkumpadan F, Blake R, et al. Mechanistic Inquiry into the Role of Tissue Remodeling in Fibrotic Lesions in Human Atrial Fibrillation. Biophys J. 2013;104(12):2764–2773. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.05.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chang KC, Bayer JD, Trayanova NA. Disrupted Calcium Release as a Mechanism for Atrial Alternans Associated with Human Atrial Fibrillation. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014;10(12). doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chang KC, Trayanova NA. Mechanisms of arrhythmogenesis related to calcium-driven alternans in a model of human atrial fibrillation. Sci Rep. 2016;6(October):1–12. doi: 10.1038/srep36395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.McDowell KS, Zahid S, Vadakkumpadan F, Blauer J, MacLeod RS, Trayanova NA. Virtual Electrophysiological Study of Atrial Fibrillation in Fibrotic Remodeling. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):1–16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zahid S, Cochet H, Boyle PM, et al. Patient-derived models link re-entrant driver localization in atrial fibrillation to fibrosis spatial pattern. Cardiovasc Res. 2016;110(3):443–454. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvw073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Haissaguerre M, Shah AJ, Cochet H, et al. Intermittent drivers anchoring to structural heterogeneities as a major pathophysiological mechanism of human persistent atrial fibrillation. Journal of Physiology. 2016;594(9):2387–2398. doi: 10.1113/JP270617 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2018;20(1):e1–e160. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pappone C, Rosanio S, Oreto G, et al. Circumferential radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary vein ostia: A new anatomic approach for curing atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2000;102(21):2619–2628. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.102.21.2619 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Marrouche NF, Wilber D, Hindricks G, et al. Association of atrial tissue fibrosis identified by delayed enhancement MRI and atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: The DECAAF study. JAMA. 2014;311(5):498–506. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Den Uijl DW, Delgado V, Bertini M, et al. Impact of left atrial fibrosis and left atrial size on the outcome of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Heart. 2011;97(22):1847–1851. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2010.215335 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Deng D, Murphy MJ, Hakim JB, et al. Sensitivity of reentrant driver localization to electrophysiological parameter variability in image-based computational models of persistent atrial fibrillation sustained by a fibrotic substrate. Chaos. 2017;27(9). doi: 10.1063/1.5003340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hakim JB, Murphy MJ, Trayanova NA, Boyle PM. Arrhythmia dynamics in computational models of the atria following virtual ablation of re-entrant drivers. Europace. 2018;20:III45–III54. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zahid S, Whyte KN, Schwarz EL, et al. Feasibility of using patient-specific models and the “minimum cut” algorithm to predict optimal ablation targets for left atrial flutter. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(8):1687–1698. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.04.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cochet H, Dubois R, Yamashita S, et al. Relationship Between Fibrosis Detected on Late Gadolinium-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Re-Entrant Activity Assessed With Electrocardiographic Imaging in Human Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4(1):17–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.07.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Boyle PM, Hakim JB, Zahid S, et al. The fibrotic substrate in persistent atrial fibrillation patients: Comparison between predictions from computational modeling and measurements from focal impulse and rotor mapping. Front Physiol. 2018;9(AUG):1–12. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Boyle PM, Hakim JB, Zahid S, et al. Comparing reentrant drivers predicted by image-based computational modeling and mapped by electrocardiographic imaging in persistent atrial fibrillation. Front Physiol. 2018;9(APR):1–12. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ali RL, Hakim JB, Boyle PM, et al. Arrhythmogenic propensity of the fibrotic substrate after atrial fibrillation ablation: A longitudinal study using magnetic resonance imaging-based atrial models. Cardiovasc Res. 2019;115(12):1757–1765. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvz083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shade JK, Ali RL, Basile D, et al. Preprocedure Application of Machine Learning and Mechanistic Simulations Predicts Likelihood of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence following Pulmonary Vein Isolation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020;13(7):617–627. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.008213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Goldberger Z, Lampert R. Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Expanding Indications and Technologies. JAMA. 2006;295(7):809–818. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.7.809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, et al. Amiodarone or an Implantable Cardioverter–Defibrillator for Congestive Heart Failure. New England Journal of Medicine. 2005;352(3):225–237. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043399 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Reynolds MR, Cohen DJ, Kugelmass AD, et al. The Frequency and Incremental Cost of Major Complications Among Medicare Beneficiaries Receiving Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(12):2493–2497. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Arevalo HJ, Vadakkumpadan F, Guallar E, et al. Arrhythmia risk stratification of patients after myocardial infarction using personalized heart models. Nat Commun. 2016;7(May):1–8. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Deng D, Arevalo HJ, Prakosa A, Callans DJ, Trayanova NA. A feasibility study of arrhythmia risk prediction in patients with myocardial infarction and preserved ejection fraction. Europace. 2016;18:iv60–iv66. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sung E, Prakosa A, Zhou S, et al. Fat infiltration in the infarcted heart as a paradigm for ventricular arrhythmias. Nature Cardiovascular Research. 2022;1(10):933–945. doi: 10.1038/s44161-022-00133-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Xu L, Zahid S, Khoshknab M, et al. Conduction Velocity Dispersion Predicts Postinfarct Ventricular Tachycardia Circuit Sites and Associates With Lipomatous Metaplasia. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2023;9(8). doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2023.05.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Xu L, Zahid S, Khoshknab M, et al. Lipomatous Metaplasia Facilitates Slow Conduction in Critical Ventricular Tachycardia Corridors Within Postinfarct Myocardium. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2023;9(8). doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2023.02.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Xu L, Zahid S, Khoshknab MP, et al. Regional Basal Rhythm Myocardial Conduction Velocity Dispersion Predicts Ventricular Tachycardia Circuit Sites and Associates With Lipomatous Metaplasia in Patients With Chronic Ischemic Cardiomyopathy. Heart Rhythm. 2023;20(5):S558–S559. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.03.1190 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Popescu DM, Shade JK, Lai C, et al. Arrhythmic sudden death survival prediction using deep learning analysis of scarring in the heart. Nature Cardiovascular Research. 2022;1(4):334–343. doi: 10.1038/s44161-022-00041-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Cartoski MJ, Nikolov PP, Prakosa A, Boyle PM, Spevak PJ, Trayanova NA. Computational Identification of Ventricular Arrhythmia Risk in Pediatric Myocarditis. Pediatr Cardiol. 2019;40(4):857–864. doi: 10.1007/s00246-019-02082-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Shade JK, Cartoski MJ, Nikolov P, et al. Ventricular arrhythmia risk prediction in repaired Tetralogy of Fallot using personalized computational cardiac models. Heart Rhythm. 2020;17(3). doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.10.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.O’Hara RP, Binka E, Prakosa A, et al. Personalized computational heart models with T1-mapped fibrotic remodeling predict sudden death risk in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Elife. 2022;11:1–17. doi: 10.7554/eLife.73325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.O’Hara RP, Prakosa A, Binka E, Lacy A, Trayanova NA. Arrhythmia in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Risk prediction using contrast enhanced MRI, T1 mapping, and personalized virtual heart technology. J Electrocardiol. 2022;74(September):122–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2022.09.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Shade JK, Prakosa A, Popescu DM, et al. Predicting risk of sudden cardiac death in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis using multimodality imaging and personalized heart modeling in a multivariable classifier. Sci Adv. 2021;7(31). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abi8020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zhang Y, Zhang K, Prakosa A, et al. Predicting Ventricular Tachycardia Circuits in Patients with Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy using Genotype-specific Heart Digital Twins. Published online 2023. doi: 10.7554/elife.88865.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Aliot EM, Stevenson WG, Almendral-Garrote JM, et al. EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. Developed in a partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a Registered Branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS); i. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6(6):886–933. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.04.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cronin EM, Bogun FM, Maury P, et al. 2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias. Europace. 2019;21(8):1143–1144. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ashikaga H, Arevalo H, Vadakkumpadan F, et al. Feasibility of image-based simulation to estimate ablation target in human ventricular arrhythmia. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10(8):1109–1116. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.04.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Prakosa A, Arevalo HJ, Deng D, et al. Personalized virtual-heart technology for guiding the ablation of infarct-related ventricular tachycardia. Nat Biomed Eng. 2018;2(10):732–740. doi: 10.1038/s41551-018-0282-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Deng D, Prakosa A, Shade J, Nikolov P, Trayanova NA. Sensitivity of ablation targets prediction to electrophysiological parameter variability in image-based computational models of ventricular tachycardia in post-infarction patients. Front Physiol. 2019;10:628. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Sung E, Prakosa A, Aronis KN, et al. Personalized Digital-Heart Technology for Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Targeting in Hearts With Infiltrating Adiposity. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020;13(12):E008912. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008912 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Sung E, Prakosa A, Trayanova NA. Analyzing the Role of Repolarization Gradients in Post-infarct Ventricular Tachycardia Dynamics Using Patient-Specific Computational Heart Models. Front Physiol. 2021;12:740389. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.740389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zhou S, Sung E, Prakosa A, et al. Feasibility study shows concordance between image-based virtual-heart ablation targets and predicted ECG-based arrhythmia exit-sites. PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 2021;44(3):432–441. doi: 10.1111/pace.14181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Jelvehgaran P, O’Hara R, Prakosa A, et al. Computational Re-Entry Vulnerability Index Mapping to Guide Ablation in Patients With Postmyocardial Infarction Ventricular Tachycardia. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2023;9(3):301–310. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.10.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Sung E, Prakosa A, Kyranakis S, Berger RD, Chrispin J, Trayanova NA. Wavefront directionality and decremental stimuli synergistically improve identification of ventricular tachycardia substrate: insights from personalized computational heart models. Europace. 2023;25(1):223–235. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Pashakhanloo F, Herzka DA, Ashikaga H, et al. Myofiber architecture of the human atria as revealed by submillimeter diffusion tensor imaging. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9(4):e004133. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Shade JK, Prakosa A, Okada DR, Chrispin J, Trayanova N. Novel Approach to Arrhythmia Risk Stratification in Patients With Cardiac Sarcoidosis Incorporating Machine Learning and a MRI-PET-Fusion Computational Model. Circulation. 2018;138(Suppl_1):A15069–A15069. doi: 10.1161/circ.138.suppl_1.15069 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES