Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: BJOG. 2023 Sep 8;131(4):518–520. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17664

Changes in medication initiation and selection patterns for gestational diabetes management

Amelie Pham 1, Rena Shi 1,3, Andrew D Wiese 3, Andrew J Spieker 2, Sharon E Phillips 2, Margaret A Adgent 3, Carlos G Grijalva 3,4, Sarah S Osmundson 1
PMCID: PMC10872913  NIHMSID: NIHMS1927936  PMID: 37680192

The reported frequency of medication management for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) varies widely in prior studies (8–56%) depending on study population and research approach.1 Yet, recent trends in medication preference for GDM management remain understudied.1 We examined changes in GDM medication use over time among Tennessee Medicaid (TennCare) recipients.

We identified pregnant patients with a diagnosis of GDM, aged 15–44 years, and enrolled in TennCare who delivered a live infant between 2007–2019 (Appendix A). Patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes, hypoglycemic medication prescriptions filled prior to GDM diagnosis, and GDM prescriptions filled for medications other than metformin, insulin, or glyburide were excluded. Data were derived from TennCare files linked to birth certificates and a statewide hospitalization registry. Filled prescriptions for GDM medications were used as a proxy for medication use. We identified the initial GDM medication filled after GDM diagnosis and used logistic regression to assess the association between delivery year and any GDM medication use accounting for maternal age, body mass index (BMI), race and ethnicity, residential distance from delivery facility, and facility. We also examined changes in use of specific GDM medications over time. The study was approved by our institution’s and the Tennessee Department of Health’s Institutional Review Boards, with exemption for informed consent given the large number of cohort patients and the retrospective nature of our study.

Among 32,177 pregnant patients with GDM included in the study, mean maternal age was 26.8 (±5.8) years and BMI was 30.3 (±8.4) kg/m2 at delivery. Overall, 6,617 (20.6%) initiated pharmacotherapy for GDM with either metformin (34.9%), insulin (21.5%), or glyburide (43.6%). During the study period, we did not observe major changes in trends in maternal age, maternal pre-pregnancy BMI or the race/ethnicity composition of the study population (Appendix B and C). Substantial changes in selection of initial GDM medication were also observed over time. In 2007, most patients used glyburide (45.8%) or insulin (40.0%) and fewer used metformin (14.2%). Metformin use surpassed glyburide after 2016, with most patients receiving metformin in 2019 (63.2%) followed by insulin (27.5%) and glyburide (9.3%) (Figure). No relevant changes in TennCare medication formulary occurred during the study period.

Figure: Trends in initial GDM medication prescription (Glyburide, Metformin, or Insulin) by delivery year among pregnant Tennessee Medicaid patients with GDM, 2007 – 2019 (N=6,617).

Figure:

*Delivery year significantly associated with increase in odds for medication initiation when adjusting for a priori selected variables including, maternal age (years), body mass index at delivery (BMI, kg/m2), race and ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, and other), distance from delivering facility (miles), and facility (p-value considered significant when p<0.05).

Orange short dash line: represents the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guideline change (July 2017, reaffirmed in 2019) recommending that glyburide treatment should not be recommended as a first-choice pharmacologic treatment, over metformin or insulin.

Orange long dash line: represents the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine guideline change (May 2018) recommending that both insulin and metformin are reasonable first-line options.

The prevalence of medication use among GDM patients in Tennessee Medicaid has increased over time, with metformin now the most commonly initiated GDM medication.

In a recent study of commercially insured beneficiaries, Venkatash et al. also observed substantial changes in GDM pharmacotherapies from 2015 to 2018, noting a shift from glyburide to insulin as the most common initial treatment for GDM.2 In contrast, our study in a Medicaid population determined that metformin has replaced glyburide as the most used initial medication. Our data, from an underserved population enrolled in a Medicaid program, also differed with an overall lower use of insulin (21.5%) compared to metformin (34.9%) (Venkatesh et al’s study among privately insured patients: 31% vs 21%, respectively). These discrepant findings suggest possible differential prescribing based on socioeconomic status or regional differences in prescribing preferences. Publicly insured patients may also be preferentially prescribed oral hypoglycemic medications due to rising insulin costs. Nevertheless, the changes observed in our Medicaid study align temporally with emerging evidence on the safety and effectiveness of oral hypoglycemic medications1,3,4 and corresponding changes in the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) practice recommendations,5 highlighting how practice patterns can shift quickly. Taken together, these studies underscore the need for additional assessments of factors that influence pharmacotherapy selection for GDM management, as well as the clinical impact of prescribing pattern changes on perinatal outcomes and healthcare costs.

Supplementary Material

Supinfo

FUNDING:

This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health - NICHD (R21HD104983). A.D.W. was supported by K01DA051683 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. S.S.O was supported by K23DA047476 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. The funders did not have a role in any aspect of developing the report or in the decision to submit the article for publication.

We acknowledge the Division of TennCare of the Tennessee Department of Finance and Administration, which provided data for the study. We are also indebted to the Tennessee Department of Health for providing data for the study. AP had full access to all data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and accuracy of the data analysis.

DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS:

C.G.G. reports consulting fees from Merck, and received research support from Syneos Health, NIH, CDC, FDA and AHRQ. A.D.W. reports consulting fees from the Tennessee Department of Health. All other authors report no conflict of interest. The Tennessee Department of Health was involved in the interpretation of the data and the decision to submit the report for publication. All other sponsors were not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, writing of the report, or the decision to submit the report for publication.

Footnotes

ETHICS APPROVAL: The study was approved by the Vanderbilt University Medical Center (IRB # 190068, approval date 1/18/2019) and the Tennessee Department of Health (IRB # TDH IRB 2019-0099, approval date 5/10/2021) Institutional Review Boards.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

REFERENCES:

  • 1.Camelo Castillo W, Boggess K, Sturmer T, Brookhart MA, Benjamin DK Jr., Jonsson Funk M. Trends in glyburide compared with insulin use for gestational diabetes treatment in the United States, 2000–2011. Obstet Gynecol. Jun 2014;123(6):1177–1184. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Venkatesh KK, Chiang CW, Castillo WC, et al. Changing patterns in medication prescription for gestational diabetes during a time of guideline change in the USA: a cross-sectional study. BJOG. Feb 2022;129(3):473–483. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16960 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Balsells M, Garcia-Patterson A, Sola I, Roque M, Gich I, Corcoy R. Glibenclamide, metformin, and insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. Jan 21 2015;350:h102. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.George A, Mathews JE, Sam D, et al. Comparison of neonatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes with moderate hyperglycaemia on metformin or glibenclamide--a randomised controlled trial. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. Feb 2015;55(1):47–52. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.ACOG. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(2):e49–e64. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supinfo

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

RESOURCES