Abstract
Pioneer factors are a subclass of transcription factors that can bind and initiate opening of silent chromatin regions. Pioneer factors subsequently regulate lineage-specific genes and enhancers and thus activate zygotic genome after fertilization, they guide cell fate transitions during development, and they can promote various forms of human cancers. As such, pioneer factors are useful in directed cell reprogramming. In this review, we define structural and functional characteristics of pioneer factors, how they bind and initiate opening of closed chromatin regions, and the consequences on chromatin dynamics and gene expression during cell differentiation. We also discuss emerging mechanisms that modulate pioneer factors during development.
Keywords: Pioneer factor, development, zygotic gene activation, nucleosome, heterochromatin, gene expression
Introduction: Pioneer factor definition and recent discoveries
The vast majority of DNA in the nucleus is wrapped into nucleosomes and assembled into chromatin fibers, making DNA inaccessible to many transcription factors and other gene regulatory proteins (Figure 1A). Active genes and enhancers typically harbor an open chromatin conformation and exist in euchromatin. Active promoters and enhancers can include nucleosome-depleted regions where DNA is accessible to transcription factors and protein machineries [1]. They are often flanked by nucleosomes harboring the histone modifications H3K27Ac, H3K4me3 and/or H3K4me1 (Figure 1B). However, euchromatin regions represent a small fraction of the nuclear genome; the largest fraction being nucleosome-dense and folded into compacted and silent chromatin. We now appreciate that silent chromatin can be in distinct molecular forms [2, 3], including naïve chromatin which is enriched for linker histone H1 isoforms that compact chromatin [2], H3K9me3-marked heterochromatin, which is bound by the chromatin compacting protein Heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1), and H3K27me3-marked heterochromatin, which is bound by the chromatin-compacting Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) and Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) (see Glossary and Figure 1B). These three silent chromatin states, naïve, H3K9me3-marked, and H3K27me3-marked, repress lineage-specific genes, enhancers, DNA regulatory elements, and repeat elements [3–5]. During development, new spatiotemporal, lineage-specific gene expression networks are required to induce cell differentiation, necessitating a transition from silent chromatin states to an open chromatin conformation at promoters and enhancers. The transition is often initiated by pioneer factors, which thus are among the master regulators of cell fate changes [6–12] (Figure 1A). Herein we primarily focus on the latest studies in the field.
Figure 1: Pioneer factors bind silent chromatin and drive cell differentiation.

(A) Left: Pioneer factors binds closed chromatin regions. Middle: Pioneer factor induces local DNA accessibility to other transcription factors and protein complexes. Right: Pioneer factor induces chromatin reorganization and thus DNA sequence activation. Protein machineries include histone modifying complexes, the RNA polymerase transcription complex, and additional protein complexes regulating cis-regulatory elements. (B) Chromatin state of cis-regulatory elements in euchromatin regions (top) and silent chromatin regions (bottom). Unlike canonical transcription factors (TFs), pioneer factors (PFs) are able to bind silent chromatin regions. (C) Pioneer factors guide cell differentiation; their dysregulation might lead to cancer or cell reprogramming. Pioneer factors drive zygotic gene activation.
Pioneer factors interact with silent chromatin regions and enable their remodeling into an active chromatin conformation (Figure 1A) or further compaction and silencing, as reviewed recently [13–15]. Pioneer factors’ opening chromatin can lead to activation of lineage-specific genes and enhancers [6, 16, 17] and guide cell differentiation [7, 9, 10, 16, 18, 19]. Indeed the factors’ ectopic expression can initiate cell fate transitions [8, 17, 20–24], whereas pioneer factor-depleted cells often fail to differentiate [6, 7, 9, 11, 19, 22, 24–30]. Furthermore, pioneer factor dysregulation can cause aberrant cell phenotypes, such as cancer [31, 32] or cell reprogramming [33–39], as recently reviewed [40] (Figure 1C). Indeed, chromosome translocations can form oncogenic-fusion pioneer factors, such as Paired box gene 3-Forkhead box protein O1 (PAX3-FOXO1) in rhabdomyosarcoma cancer cells, leading to cancer [41] by altering enhancer repertory usage and gene expression profile [42–44].
The fundamental role of pioneer factors in development has been affirmed by their ability to drive zygotic gene activation [6, 11, 25, 26, 30] (Figure 1C). First characterized in Drosophila, the pioneer factor Zelda initiates zygotic gene transcription in the early embryo [45, 46]. In mouse and human, Double homeobox (DUX) family factors, which can target closed chromatin [47], have been identified as being required for the zygotic genome activation, since their zygotic depletion leads to defective genome zygotic activation and impairs embryonic development [48]. In Zebrafish as well, the POU Domain, class 5, transcription factor 3 (Pou5f3), the SRY-box transcription factor 19b (Sox19b), together act as pioneer factors with homeobox protein NANOG (Nanog) to activate zygotic gene transcription. Triple zygotic mutants are deficient in zygotic gene expression and fail to induce embryonic development [26]. Upon fertilization, the zygotic genome harbors closed and inactive chromatin. Pioneer factors, such Nuclear receptor subfamily 5 group A (Nr5a2) in murine zygotic cells [6], target closed chromatin and initiating its opening, which results in zygotic gene expression during early developmental stage [45, 48].
While the distinction between canonical transcription factors and pioneer factors can be considered to be a continuum [49], pioneer factors are defined by specific properties that distinguish them from other transcription factors [50–52]. Whereas canonical transcription factors have weak affinity for closed chromatin regions and their binding on DNA target site is impeded by nucleosomes [51–53], pioneer factors present a higher affinity for closed chromatin [50, 51, 53–56] and weak dissociation from nucleosomal DNA [51, 53, 57]. Therefore, pioneer factors are defined by their ability to bind their target DNA site on nucleosomes in vitro [25, 36, 52, 53, 58–72] and in vivo [33, 73–75]. Moreover, recent biophysical and structural studies highlight details by which pioneer factors can differentially interact with nucleosome core particles [51, 59, 63, 65, 67, 72, 76], whereas canonical transcription factors do it poorly or undetectably [51]. Such structural studies are relatively new, so we can anticipate that additional mechanisms of nucleosome interactions will be revealed as more structural studies are performed [77]. Pioneer factors are also characterized by their ability, upon binding in vitro, to perturb the structure of an underlying nucleosome in an ATPase-independent manner [51, 58, 59, 63, 64, 67, 71, 73], though full opening of chromatin sites targeted by the factors in vivo involves ATP-dependent remodelers [32, 34, 78, 79]. In this review, we describe the latest studies on characteristics of pioneer factors and how they regulate cell fate, and then present mechanisms of regulation of pioneer factors during development.
Pioneer factors scan and bind locally closed chromatin
Investigations into the underlying mechanisms of action reveal that the act of “pioneering” occurs through multiple steps: chromatin scanning, nucleosomal DNA targeting, and local chromatin reorganization. First, pioneer factors need to identify their specific DNA binding sites by scanning the chromatin fiber. While they can freely diffuse in the nucleus, they also exhibit many associations with nucleosomal chromatin to reach their DNA binding site [80, 81] (Figure 2A). Single molecule tracking microscopy assays showed that pioneer factors have a short residence time on closed chromatin while non-pioneers seem to avoid it altogether [50, 54–56, 80]. Nonspecific electrostatic interactions with the phosphodiester backbone, as it is exposed on the nucleosome surface, allows the pioneer factors to scan closed chromatin loci across the nucleus [50, 55, 74]. While their on-off behavior and local proximity to DNA mass would allow them to scan nucleosomal DNA via one-dimensional diffusion [80], a recent biophysical study of the GAGA pioneer factor (GAF) pioneer factor indicates that nucleosome scanning is more of a three-dimensional process [56]. Detailed single-molecule-tracking studies comparing the Forkhead box A1 (FOXA1) and SRY-box transcription factor (SOX2) pioneer factors for chromatin scanning showed that FOXA1 diffuses slowly in closed chromatin domains, whereas SOX2 diffuses more rapidly in such domains; yet in ectopic expression experiments, both factors similarly target closed chromatin target sites with low-turnover nucleosomes [50]. By contrast, comparably expressed Hepatocyte nuclear factor-4-alpha (HNF4A), a transcription factor that appears not to be a pioneer factor, scans closed chromatin poorly and when it does so, it targets sites with high-turnover nucleosomes [50]. Observing differences for chromatin scanning among the few pioneer factors assessed in this fashion suggests that there will be a variety of mechanisms by which such factors scan chromatin.
Figure 2: Mechanism of action of Pioneer factors to induce silent chromatin opening.

(A) Unlike canonical transcription factor (TF), pioneer factors (PFs) can transiently interact with silent chromatin in order to identify their binding sites. (B) Pioneer factor interacts with nucleosomal DNA containing its DNA motif through its DNA-binding domain (DBD) and its non-DNA-binding domain. The non-DNA-binding domain establishes non-specific electrostatic interactions with nucleosomal DNA and direct contacts with nucleosome core particle, as described by Donovan et al. (2023) [51]. (C) Pioneer factor binding induces local silent chromatin opening by inducing local DNA accessibility and local chromatin decompaction.
While scanning chromatin, pioneer factors can transiently interact with target motifs on nucleosomal DNA [25, 51] (Figure 2B). The DNA-binding domain (DBD) itself is sufficient to bind nucleosomes, as observed for FOXA1 [82] and SOX2 [58], but remains to be confirmed for additional pioneer factors. DBD deletion of Octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (OCT4) abolishes binding [69], confirming its fundamental role in nucleosomal DNA binding. DNA-binding domains of pioneer factors typically fold into an α-helix or short helical twist structure, allowing nucleosome invasion and DNA anchoring [60]. Pioneer factors preferentially bind their target DNA motif when it localizes at nucleosome entry/exit site or at DNA groove exposed on nucleosome surface [32, 52, 59, 65, 67, 71, 72, 83].
Mutations of pioneer factors, outside the DNA-binding domain, can selectively impact nucleosome binding [10, 84–86] and the ability to drive cell fate [76]. A striking example is provided by the deletion of four amino acids within linker region between two DNA-binding domains of the OCT4 that ablates nucleosome binding and OCT4’s reprogramming function, without affecting how the factor binds free DNA [69]. Recent cross-linking studies have showed that non-DNA-binding domains can be in close proximity to the nucleosome surface and establish pioneer factor-nucleosome interactions [51, 59, 67, 69, 72, 76]. Different pioneer factors use different forms of interaction with nucleosome. A pioneer factor residue can interact with specific residues of the histone core or N-terminal extensions (tails) [59, 76], such as for Cbf1, where its E253 residue interacts with K75 residue of H2A histone [51] (Figure 2B). Pioneer factors can also establish electrostatic interactions with the nucleosome surface [67]. OCT4 has a small acidic patch with which it can interact with positively charged lysine and arginine residues of histones [67, 87]. The various emerging mechanisms illustrate how we are only beginning to understand how pioneer factors interact with nucleosomes.
Pioneer factors can open locally closed chromatin
After binding to closed chromatin, pioneer factors can induce local chromatin decompaction. Recent ChIP-nexus experiments on Drosophila embryos demonstrate that the Zelda pioneer factor initiates and drives chromatin opening, while other transcription factors tested only increase chromatin accessibility that was already initiated by pioneer factors [88]. How does this initiate? Pioneer factor binding to nucleosomes often leads to DNA accessibility, making the nucleosomal DNA sensitive to nucleases [58, 60, 65, 71, 89] or accessible to other proteins [58, 89–91]. Incubating FOXA1 [92], PU.1 [61], or OCT4 [71] with a linker histone (H1)-compacted nucleosome array induces DNAseI cleavage underlying its binding site, in the absence of an ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeler. Pioneer factors elicit the initial step of chromatin opening by inducing DNA distortions [51, 74, 87] and limited DNA unwrapping of the nucleosome [51, 63, 65, 72, 87] (Figure 2C). The binding of OCT4 on nucleosome unwraps 25 bp of nucleosomal DNA [71]. Pioneer factors alone can also induce nucleosome sliding [51, 74, 87] and histone tail reposition [58]. Upon its binding, OCT4 and H4/H2B histone tails are in close proximity, leading to conformation changes and relocalization of histone tails [67, 71]. This could decrease inter-nucleosome interactions and nucleosome stacking, mechanistically explaining local chromatin opening by the factors [74] (Figure 2C). Finally, due to their ability to bind DNA at nucleosome entry/exit site, or near the nucleosome dyad axis, pioneer factors can displace and compete with histone linker H1 [59, 71, 89] (Figure 2C). Indeed, Abbreviated LFY (Leafy) pioneer factor has structure similarity with H1 [73]. We could assume that this competition mechanism could be shared by several pioneer factors, since many bind the nucleosome entry/exit site [6, 32, 51, 59, 65, 67, 69, 71].
Pioneer factors enable ATP-dependent chromatin reorganization and cis-regulatory element activation
After local chromatin decompaction, additional protein machineries are required to promote complete opening of closed chromatin regions. Foundational in vitro studies using chromatin assembled with Drosophila embryo extracts showed that pioneer factor GAF’s nucleosome disruption depends on ATP hydrolysis via the Nucleosome remodeling factor (NURF) complex [93], indicating that complete chromatin remodeling is an energy dependent pathway. In a recent in vitro study using fully purified, H1-compacted nucleosome arrays, purified PU.1 pioneer factor and purified canonical BRG1/BRM-associated factor (cBAF) Switch/sucrose nonfermenting (SWI/SNF) nucleosome remodeling complex showed that PU.1 alone could initiate DNA hypersensitivity underlying its binding site, which was enabled by an unstructured domain of PU.1. The initially open domain was expanded by the cBAF complex only in presence of ATP [61] (Figure 3A). In addition, incubation of cBAF complex with a PU.1 mutant deficient in its recruitment of cBAF, but which still harbors the PU.1 unstructured domain and a robust local chromatin opening activity, did not allow cBAF action [61]. The result argues against a model whereby the cBAF remodeler scans chromatin for a partially open site and argues for a model where the pioneer factor must elicit local chromatin opening and simultaneously recruit or stabilize the remodeler at the site.
Figure 3: Pioneer factors drive closed chromatin reorganization and gene expression activation.

(A) In vitro, PU.1 is able to recruit the cBAF SWI/SNF nucleosome remodeling complex on H1-compacted nucleosome arrays to expand local DNA accessibility, as described by Frederick et al. (2023) [61]. (B) In vivo, a pioneer factor (PF) leads to chromatin reorganization and thus enhancer activation. Pioneer factor recruits SWI/SNF nucleosome remodeling complexes to promote nucleosome eviction and chromatin opening. Pioneer factors promote deposition of active chromatin on enhancer by recruiting MLL3/4 and p300 enzymes.
During cell differentiation, pioneer factors directly recruit SWI/SNF nucleosome remodeling complexes by interacting with different subunits of SWI/SNF complexes [94, 95], such as Brahma-related gene-1 (BRG1) [16, 34, 36, 78, 79, 96] or BAF [9]. Thus, pioneer factors guide SWI/SNF-dependent remodeler on specific silent loci which are important for cell differentiation. After their recruitment on chromatin, SWI/SNF nucleosome remodeling complexes evict nucleosomes [34, 78] and promote chromatin rearrangement, leading to an open chromatin conformation [9, 36, 78, 94, 96, 97] (Figure 3B). While pioneer factors recruit and stabilize SWI/SNF complexes on chromatin [34, 36, 61, 78, 94, 98], the open domains created by SWI/SNF complexes can subsequently stabilize pioneer factors on chromatin [34, 78, 79]. Indeed, inhibition of BRG1 led to a reduction of PU.1 binding [79]. The recent results suggest a positive feedback loop between pioneer factors and SWI/SNF nucleosome remodeling complexes that can maintain an open chromatin conformation on cis-regulatory elements.
After initial chromatin opening, additional transcription factors and other protein complexes bind the newly accessible region [97, 99]. Pioneer factor binding correlates with a reduction of cytosine methylation of 5-methylCpG residues [86, 100–103]; CpG methylation (5mC) normally represses enhancers [104]. Indeed pioneer factors can recruit Ten-eleven translocation (TET) enzymes to enhancers [101, 105], leading to conversion of 5mC into 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) [105, 106]. Pioneer factors also establish an active chromatin state on enhancers by recruiting Mixed Lineage Leukemia-3 and -4 (MLL3/4) [107, 108] and p300 [16, 26, 47, 109] enzymes, which deposit H3K4me1 and H3K27ac on enhancers, respectively (Figure 3B). FOXA1 can recruit TET enzymes and reduce 5mC on enhancers [106, 110], while also recruiting MLL3 and promoting H3K4me1 deposition [108]; both of which increase enhancer activity and gene expression. Finally, pioneer factors mediate enhancer-promoter proximity [33, 94, 111] and thus stimulate target lineage-specific gene expression. T cell factor 1 (TCF1) regulates CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) on enhancers [112]. A recent mechanism based on protein aggregation has been identified [113–115]. Indeed OCT4 [114] and Nanog [115] can form protein aggregates to favor enhancer-promoter communications and gene activation.
Pioneer factors can also result in further closing of chromatin and gene silencing
To direct cell differentiation, pioneer factors also elicit silencing of other lineage specific-genes [19, 21, 23, 33, 95, 100]. They can indirectly inactivate gene expression by inducing passive enhancer inactivation. That is, pioneer factor binding on chromatin leads to transcription factors and protein machinery relocalization on the enhancer repertoire; thus away from active enhancers [17, 116, 117]. For example, induction of SRY-box transcription factor 9 (SOX9), a pioneer factor driving the hair follicle fate, in epidermal stem cells indirectly silences epidermal related genes by interacting with SWI/SNF remodeling complexes and MLL4/3, and recruiting them away from active epidermal enhancers [95] (Figure 4A). Pioneer factors can also directly inactivate genes by establishing silent chromatin on enhancers and promoters, which can include chromatin closure. For example, FOXA1, which when it recruits the Groucho homolog (Grg) transcriptional repressor to naïve chromatin, can induce local chromatin compaction and impairs binding of other transcription factors [118] (Figure 4B). Pioneer factors can also drive chromatin closure by recruiting histone deacetylases, such as Nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase (NuRD) complex, which causes erasure of the H3K27ac active histone mark and loss of chromatin accessibility on enhancers [119, 120] (Figure 4C). A recent study showed that the GAF pioneer factor can elicit H3K9me3 deposition on DNA repeats and transcriptional silencing during Drosophila zygotic genome activation [121]. Pioneer factors interact with diverse repressive complexes [33, 120]. Some pioneer factors, such as PU.1, can recruit and stimulate the PRC2 complex, inducing H3K27me3-marked heterochromatin deposition on lineage-specific enhancers and promoters [23, 33, 100, 119] (Figure 4C). To summarize, pioneering occurs when the transcription factor targets a naïve domain of chromatin and, via partners, elicits a new functional capacity to the domain: either open and active or closed and further silenced.
Figure 4: Pioneer factors induce gene silencing.

(A) Pioneer factors induce passive enhancer inactivation by relocalizing protein complexes on chromatin. As described by Yang et al. (2023) [95], SOX9 recruits MLL3/4 and SWI/SNF nucleosome remodeling complex away from active epidermal enhancers during a hair follicle cell fate transition. (B) In vitro, FOXA1 increases local compaction of closed chromatin by recruiting Grg transcriptional corepressor, as described by Sekiya et al. (2007) [118]. (C) In vivo, pioneer factors directly induces enhancer inactivation. It erases active chromatin and induces chromatin closure on enhancers by recruiting histone deacetylase complex (NuRD). Pioneer factors also establish H3K27me3-marked heterochromatin by recruiting and stimulating the PRC2 complex.
Pioneer factors maintain cell identity
During mitosis, chromatin is massively condensed into mitotic chromosomes, many DNA-binding proteins are evicted from chromosomes, and transcription is diminished, but not completely silent [122]. After mitosis exit, cells reactivate lineage-specific gene expression to restore their identity. Live imaging, using fluorescent protein-fused pioneer factors, showed that at least a subset of pioneer factors, such as FOXA1, PAX3, SOX2 and GATA binding protein 2 (GATA2), stay associated with mitotic chromosomes [123–125]. Their mitotic chromosome binding ability is related to their affinity for closed chromatin, since it depends on their DNA-binding domains and their ability to establish non-specific electrostatic interactions with closed chromatin [123–127]. SOX2 degradation specifically in mitosis leads to a loss of pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells [127]. Thus, pioneer factors have an important role in the maintenance of cell identity.
Modulating pioneer factor activity
During tissue specification, pioneer factors have dynamic binding and action on silent chromatin to progressively guide lineage specific gene expression [7, 10, 17, 19–21, 24, 100, 117, 128, 129]. Pioneer factors do not generate “peaks” in binding assays at all of their potential DNA binding sites in a given cell [20, 79, 83]. Yet, examining subthreshold peaks reveals extensive binding at alternative cell sites, called “sampling” [20, 50]. Moreover, DNA motif enrichment analyses have shown that pioneer factors can bind chromatin regions weakly or not enriched for their DNA binding motif [9, 21, 130]. Also, pioneer factors bind closed chromatin regions without necessarily inducing DNA accessibility [36, 90, 107]. These observations indicate that pioneer factors are modulated for their stable binding events and chromatin opening activity.
What are ways that pioneer factors can be modulated during chromatin binding? Pioneer factor binding on nucleosomal DNA depends on nucleotide sequence and the position and orientation of its target DNA motif on the nucleosome surface [52, 64, 83, 87, 131, 132]. A target DNA motif to close or facing the nucleosome surface could hinder factor binding, due to steric clashes [64, 72, 87, 131]. A recent in-vitro study using a basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) pioneer factor binding motif tiled at one base pair intervals across the DNA template shown that bHLH factors preferentially bind nucleosomes when binding motif is exposed at the +/−7 to +/−5 superhelical region on nucleosome surface [72], which is in agreement with an in vitro binding selection study for bHLH proteins [52]. To limit steric clashes, pioneer factors are able to bind partial or degenerate DNA motifs [65, 75], due to flexibility of their DNA binding domain [68]. Given the emerging structural information showing that pioneer factors interact with the core histones within a bound nucleosome, binding to only a partial motif may be compensated by histone interactions that stabilize binding.
During development, pioneer factors contribute to binding of other pioneer and/or transcription factors [88] leading to their cooperative binding on nucleosomal DNA [24, 38, 65, 131]. This may be elicited by a first bound pioneer factor to distort nucleosomal DNA leading to DNA motifs being accessible for other pioneer [58, 64, 72, 87, 131] or non-pioneer [107, 133] factor binding (Figure 5A). An increase in pioneer factor concentration correlates with an increase in nucleosome binding [25, 51, 80] and with binding of new genomic regions during development [10, 26, 134]. More recently, pioneer factors have been identified as able to form aggregates on chromatin [81, 115, 135–139]. The mechanism may ensure local increase of pioneer factor concentration and their binding events [81]. It may also promote cooperation between pioneer factors, since several pioneer factors may colocalize on a same aggregate [136]. However, how pioneer factors form aggregates is poorly understood, since deletion of their unstructured domains, known to promote protein aggregate formation, does not always destabilize pioneer factor aggregates [135, 136].
Figure 5: Pioneer binding and opening activity are modulated.

(A) Cooperative binding. A first pioneer factor binds and distorts nucleosomal DNA, leading to exposure of a second DNA motif and thus binding of a second factor. (B) Pioneer factor binding and opening activity depend on pioneer factor cofactors. As described by Zhang et al. (2019) [143], SOX2 interacts with OCT4 in embryonic stem cells, then loss its interaction with OCT4 to gain interaction with PAX6 during neural fate transition leading to SOX2 genome wide relocalization. (C) Poised pioneer factor binds closed chromatin regions but does not induce its local opening. Closed chromatin opening may occur later during development. (D) Histone modifications might favor or impede pioneer factor binding/local opening activity.
Pioneer factor function on silent chromatin can be regulated by pioneer factor’s partners. For example Tripartite motif containing 24 protein (Trim24), a p53’s cofactor, prevents p53 opening activity on closed chromatin regions [140]. In addition, during cell differentiation, pioneer factors loss of certain partners and acquisition of new partners can lead to relocalization of pioneer factor genomic occupancy and modulation of pioneer factor chromatin opening activity [129, 141]. Proteomic analysis of SOX2 between embryonic stem cells and neuronal cells shown cell-specific interactors [128, 142]. In embryonic stem cells, SOX2 interacts with OCT4. During embryonic stem cell differentiation into neural progenitor, SOX2 loss interaction with OCT4 and progressively gain interaction with a new pattern: Paired box 6 (PAX6) [143] (Figure 5B). Thus, SOX2 targets and regulates different set of lineage-specific genes during cell differentiation [143].
A ‘poised’ state of enhancers has been identified during cell differentiation, where the enhancers are bound by a pioneer factor but still harbor a closed conformation [19, 107, 144–146] (Figure 5C). They become open, and thus activated, later during development [7]; such enabling of developmental competence characterized the initial pioneer factor description for FOXA1 in undifferentiated mouse endoderm [147]. Interestingly, in cells, ectopically expressed pioneer factor can bind chromatin within 0.5–24 hours, but overt chromatin remodeling and opening may be delayed by one to five days [90]. The delay could be due to the time for subsequent recruitment of a nucleosome remodeler [61, 129], a requirement for additional developmental signals [24, 146], or loss of binding of a local inhibitor which then allows chromatin opening [140].
Histone post-translational modifications might favor [67, 148] or impede [21, 149] pioneer factor binding or local opening action by inducing steric clashes [64], altering electrostatic histone surface charges [149], de/stabilizing pioneer factor-histone interactions or DNA-histone interactions [67]. Cryo-EM structural studies using H3K27acetylated nucleosomes showed that the acetylation induces DNA sliding, increases DNA binding site exposition, and thus modulate pioneer factor binding [67] (Figure 5D). Moreover, peptide microarray assays have showed that some pioneer factors are unable to interact with specific modified histone tails [21, 149]. For example, H3K27ac histone modification prevents Myb proto-oncogene protein (c-Myb) binding on the histone tail and thus poorly colocalizes on chromatin [149] (Figure 5D). This suggests that H3K27ac might protect active enhancers from aberrant c-Myb binding or ensure c-Myb detachment and recycling from chromatin after enhancer activation. Thus, some histone modifications, and protein complexes that bind them, might repulse pioneer factors from chromatin to protect cis-regulatory elements from their action at specific stages of development.
Given all of the parameters that could affect pioneer factor binding, it may be no surprise that pioneer factors harbor diverse affinities and mechanism of actions on the three states of silent chromatins: naïve chromatin, H3K9me3-marked and H3K27me3-marked heterochromatin. First, pioneer factors seem to preferentially target naïve chromatin regions [38], since most of pioneer factor bound regions which have a closed conformation but contain low or no H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 repressive histone marks [17, 20, 107] (Figure 1B). Moreover, H3K9me3-heterochromatin had been characterized as a barrier to reprogramming [38, 150]. Yet, recent epigenomic studies found that certain pioneer factors, such as Paired box 7 (PAX7) or TCF1, target regions covered by H3K27me3 [22–24, 140] or H3K9me3 marks [21, 22, 90, 140] (Figure 1B) and then induce underlying DNA sequence activation [22–24, 140]. However, mechanisms of engagement of pioneer factors with these heterochromatin regions are poorly understood. During pituitary lineage differentiation, PAX7 has a weaker enrichment on heterochromatin regions than on naïve chromatin regions. Moreover, PAX7 induces activation of enhancers covered by H3K9me2-heterochromatin, but not by H3K9me3-heterochromatin [90], suggesting different mechanisms of regulation between the diverse types of silent chromatin. It may be that H3K9me3- and H3K27me3-heterochromatin have to be destabilized by pioneer factor-independent mechanisms, in order to facilitate pioneer factor binding and action on a more naïve-like chromatin structure during cell differentiation.
Finally recent studies revealed consequential post-translational modifications on the pioneer factors themselves. The modifications might modulate their scanning, binding, or local opening activities [60, 151–156]. For example, acetylation of PAX7 modulates its binding on chromatin and thus gene expression profile [154], while its methylation is required for its mitotic chromosome binding activity [156]. Identification of post-translational modification on pioneer factors, the associated modifying enzymes, and their consequences on pioneer factor function is a key point for the future. Such studies will allow a better understanding pioneer factor roles during development and diseases such as cancer, where pioneer factors might be mutated on potential post-translational modified residues or where modifying enzymes might be dysregulated or mutated.
Concluding remarks:
The nucleosome-targeting feature of pioneer factors enables them to drive development by targeting naïve and heterochromatic domains to elicit chromatin opening or further closing and promote subsequent cell fate transitions. RNA-binding domains have been recently identified on pioneer factors [157], which impact DNA binding; however, their role in scanning, binding and local opening of silent chromatin is unknown. In general, non-DNA-binding domains, including apparently unstructured domains that are critical for local chromatin opening by the factors [61], need to be characterized to understand their role in pioneer factor function (see Outstanding questions). Recent studies identified additional pioneer factor co-factors and post-translational modifications, but underlying mechanisms need to be better investigated to fully understand the dynamic role of pioneer factors in terms of mechanisms and roles in cell differentiation. Finally, pioneer factors are able to target diverse types of silent chromatin [21–24, 90]. However, it is unclear how pioneer factors recognize and reorganize H3K9me3- or H3K27me3-marked-heterochromatin. Addressing these questions in the future is key to fully understand pioneer factor function on silent chromatin during development and in disease (see Outstanding questions).
Outstanding Question Box:
What are different modes of interaction with nucleosomes for pioneer factors? What are mechanistic consequences of pioneer factor-nucleosome interactions on nucleosome-wrapped DNA and local chromatin decompaction? How do histone variants and histone modifications modulate pioneer factor-nucleosome interactions and chromatin opening by pioneer factors?
What is the role of non-DNA-binding domains, especially intrinsically disordered regions, in pioneer factor scanning, binding, and opening of chromatin? How do post-translational modifications of pioneer factors modulate the activities?
What are the developmental signals and their molecular mechanisms that activate enhancers that are ‘poised’ by pioneer factors?
How do pioneer factors distinguish diverse type of silent chromatin? How do pioneer factors recognize, destabilize, and reorganize H3K9me3- and H3K27me3-heterchromatin regions?
Highlights:
Pioneer factors can be master regulators of development. They are responsible for zygotic genome activation after fertilization and drive cell fate transitions during development.
Pioneer factors bind nucleosomal DNA containing their DNA binding motifs. The binding is mediated by the factor’s DNA-binding domain and via establishment of histone-pioneer factor interactions.
Pioneer factors initiate local chromatin decompaction by partially unwrapping DNA from nucleosomes and reducing local nucleosome interactions Pioneer factors recruit nucleosome remodeling complexes and chromatin modifying enzymes to promote silent chromatin reorganization, deposition of active chromatin modifications, and thus activation of underlying promoter and enhancer DNA sequences.
Pioneer factors can vary with regard to their ability to target diverse types of silent chromatin during cell differentiation.
Acknowledgement:
A.B. was supported by Postdoctoral EMBO fellowship (ALTF 266-2022). Work on pioneer factors in the lab of K.S.Z. is supported by NIH R01GM36477.
Glossary:
- Nucleosome
The nucleosome core particle is the basic repeating unit of chromatin. A nucleosome consists of about 150 bp of DNA sequence wrapped around an octamer of the four core histones: H2A, H2B, H3 and H4. Nucleosomes limit DNA sequence accessibility, and what distinguishes pioneer factors is their ability to target nucleosomal DNA.
- Transcription factor
A transcription factor is a protein able to bind a specific DNA motif on free DNA, through its DNA-binding domain, in order to regulate gene expression.
- Pioneer factor
A pioneer factor is a subclass of transcription factor able to bind a sequence motif on free DNA and when its motif DNA is exposed on a nucleosome, though the latter may be limited by the position of the motif on the nucleosome. Recent studies reveal that pioneer factors interact with DNA and histones within the nucleosome core. Pioneer factors induce local nucleosomal accessibility in chromatin to promote binding of other transcription factors or protein complexes that can either open the chromatin further or lead to its stronger compaction.
- Euchromatin
Euchromatin is an active chromatin conformation of genome where genes are expressed and cis-regulatory elements are active. Active promoters and enhancers reside in euchromatin and typically have central regions that are depleted for nucleosomes, keeping the DNA accessible to transcription factors and gene regulatory protein complexes. They are also flanked by nucleosomes enriched for specific histone modifications, such as H3K27ac, H3K4me3 and H3K4me1.
- Naive chromatin
Naive chromatin harbors a closed conformation and is transcriptionally silent. It enriches in histone linker H1 but does not harbor, or low enrichment in, specific histone modifications.
- H3K9me3-heterochromatin
H3K9me3-heterochromatin is a silent chromatin enriched in H3K9me3 and Heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1). HP1 induces H3K9me3-heterochromatin compaction. H3K9me3-heterochromatin is established by Histone methyltransferases (HMTs) Suppressor of variegation 3–9 homologs-1/2 (Suv39h-1/2) and SET domain bifurcated 1 (SETDB1) on DNA repeat sequences and lineage specific-genes and enhancers.
- H3K27me3-heterochromatin
H3K27me3-heterochromatin is a silent chromatin enriched in H3K27me3 and H2AK119ub mediated by Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) and Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) complexes, respectively. H3K27me3-heterochromatin represses lineage-specific genes to ensure cell differentiation.
- Zygotic gene activation
Zygotic gene activation is the first transcriptional expression of embryonic genes after egg fertilization.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Declaration of interest:
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References:
- 1.Thurman RE et al. (2012) The accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome. Nature 489 (7414), 75–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kundaje A et al. (2015) Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature 518 (7539), 317–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Filion GJ et al. (2010) Systematic protein location mapping reveals five principal chromatin types in Drosophila cells. Cell 143 (2), 212–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Boyer LA et al. (2006) Polycomb complexes repress developmental regulators in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature 441 (7091), 349–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nicetto D et al. (2019) H3K9me3-heterochromatin loss at protein-coding genes enables developmental lineage specification. Science 363 (6424), 294–297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gassler J et al. (2022) Zygotic genome activation by the totipotency pioneer factor Nr5a2. Science 378 (6626), 1305–1315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lee K et al. (2019) FOXA2 Is Required for Enhancer Priming during Pancreatic Differentiation. Cell Rep 28 (2), 382–393.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Magli A et al. (2019) Time-dependent Pax3-mediated chromatin remodeling and cooperation with Six4 and Tead2 specify the skeletal myogenic lineage in developing mesoderm. PLoS Biol 17 (2), e3000153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Păun O et al. (2023) Pioneer factor ASCL1 cooperates with the mSWI/SNF complex at distal regulatory elements to regulate human neural differentiation. Genes Dev 37 (5–6), 218–242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ungerbäck J et al. (2018) Pioneering, chromatin remodeling, and epigenetic constraint in early T-cell gene regulation by SPI1 (PU.1). Genome Res 28 (10), 1508–1519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Veil M et al. (2019) Pou5f3, SoxB1, and Nanog remodel chromatin on high nucleosome affinity regions at zygotic genome activation. Genome Res 29 (3), 383–395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Larson ED et al. (2021) Pioneering the developmental frontier. Mol Cell 81 (8), 1640–1650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zaret KS (2020) Pioneer Transcription Factors Initiating Gene Network Changes. Annu Rev Genet 54, 367–385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Balsalobre A and Drouin J (2022) Pioneer factors as master regulators of the epigenome and cell fate. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 23 (7), 449–464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mayran A and Drouin J (2018) Pioneer transcription factors shape the epigenetic landscape. J Biol Chem 293 (36), 13795–13804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Heslop JA et al. (2021) GATA6 defines endoderm fate by controlling chromatin accessibility during differentiation of human-induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Rep 35 (7), 109145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Thompson JJ et al. (2022) Extensive co-binding and rapid redistribution of NANOG and GATA6 during emergence of divergent lineages. Nat Commun 13 (1), 4257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Spruce C et al. (2020) HELLS and PRDM9 form a pioneer complex to open chromatin at meiotic recombination hot spots. Genes Dev 34 (5–6), 398–412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cernilogar FM et al. (2019) Pre-marked chromatin and transcription factor co-binding shape the pioneering activity of Foxa2. Nucleic Acids Res 47 (17), 9069–9086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Donaghey J et al. (2018) Genetic determinants and epigenetic effects of pioneer-factor occupancy. Nat Genet 50 (2), 250–258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fuglerud BM et al. (2022) SOX9 reprograms endothelial cells by altering the chromatin landscape. Nucleic Acids Res 50 (15), 8547–8565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Johnson JL et al. (2018) Lineage-Determining Transcription Factor TCF-1 Initiates the Epigenetic Identity of T Cells. Immunity 48 (2), 243–257.e10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pataskar A et al. (2016) NeuroD1 reprograms chromatin and transcription factor landscapes to induce the neuronal program. Embo j 35 (1), 24–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.van Oevelen C et al. (2015) C/EBPα Activates Pre-existing and De Novo Macrophage Enhancers during Induced Pre-B Cell Transdifferentiation and Myelopoiesis. Stem Cell Reports 5 (2), 232–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Duan J et al. (2021) CLAMP and Zelda function together to promote Drosophila zygotic genome activation. Elife 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Miao L et al. (2022) The landscape of pioneer factor activity reveals the mechanisms of chromatin reprogramming and genome activation. Mol Cell 82 (5), 986–1002.e9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pálfy M et al. (2020) Chromatin accessibility established by Pou5f3, Sox19b and Nanog primes genes for activity during zebrafish genome activation. PLoS Genet 16 (1), e1008546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rothstein M and Simoes-Costa M (2020) Heterodimerization of TFAP2 pioneer factors drives epigenomic remodeling during neural crest specification. Genome Res 30 (1), 35–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Delás MJ et al. (2023) Developmental cell fate choice in neural tube progenitors employs two distinct cis-regulatory strategies. Dev Cell 58 (1), 3–17.e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gaskill MM et al. (2021) GAF is essential for zygotic genome activation and chromatin accessibility in the early Drosophila embryo. Elife 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Parolia A et al. (2019) Distinct structural classes of activating FOXA1 alterations in advanced prostate cancer. Nature 571 (7765), 413–418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Takaku M et al. (2020) Cancer-specific mutation of GATA3 disrupts the transcriptional regulatory network governed by Estrogen Receptor alpha, FOXA1 and GATA3. Nucleic Acids Res 48 (9), 4756–4768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Di Giammartino DC et al. (2019) KLF4 is involved in the organization and regulation of pluripotency-associated three-dimensional enhancer networks. Nat Cell Biol 21 (10), 1179–1190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gong W et al. (2022) ETV2 functions as a pioneer factor to regulate and reprogram the endothelial lineage. Nat Cell Biol 24 (5), 672–684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Horisawa K et al. (2020) The Dynamics of Transcriptional Activation by Hepatic Reprogramming Factors. Mol Cell 79 (4), 660–676.e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Takaku M et al. (2016) GATA3-dependent cellular reprogramming requires activation-domain dependent recruitment of a chromatin remodeler. Genome Biol 17, 36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wapinski OL et al. (2017) Rapid Chromatin Switch in the Direct Reprogramming of Fibroblasts to Neurons. Cell Rep 20 (13), 3236–3247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Soufi A et al. (2012) Facilitators and impediments of the pluripotency reprogramming factors’ initial engagement with the genome. Cell 151 (5), 994–1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chen K et al. (2020) Heterochromatin loosening by the Oct4 linker region facilitates Klf4 binding and iPSC reprogramming. Embo j 39 (1), e99165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sunkel BD and Stanton BZ (2021) Pioneer factors in development and cancer. iScience 24 (10), 103132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Pandey PR et al. (2017) PAX3-FOXO1 is essential for tumour initiation and maintenance but not recurrence in a human myoblast model of rhabdomyosarcoma. J Pathol 241 (5), 626–637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gryder BE et al. (2017) PAX3-FOXO1 Establishes Myogenic Super Enhancers and Confers BET Bromodomain Vulnerability. Cancer Discov 7 (8), 884–899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Loupe JM et al. (2016) Comparative transcriptomic analysis reveals the oncogenic fusion protein PAX3-FOXO1 globally alters mRNA and miRNA to enhance myoblast invasion. Oncogenesis 5 (7), e246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sunkel BD et al. (2021) Evidence of pioneer factor activity of an oncogenic fusion transcription factor. iScience 24 (8), 102867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Harrison MM et al. (2011) Zelda binding in the early Drosophila melanogaster embryo marks regions subsequently activated at the maternal-to-zygotic transition. PLoS Genet 7 (10), e1002266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Liang HL et al. (2008) The zinc-finger protein Zelda is a key activator of the early zygotic genome in Drosophila. Nature 456 (7220), 400–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Choi SH et al. (2016) DUX4 recruits p300/CBP through its C-terminus and induces global H3K27 acetylation changes. Nucleic Acids Res 44 (11), 5161–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.De Iaco A et al. (2017) DUX-family transcription factors regulate zygotic genome activation in placental mammals. Nat Genet 49 (6), 941–945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hansen JL et al. (2022) A test of the pioneer factor hypothesis using ectopic liver gene activation. Elife 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lerner J et al. (2023) Different chromatin-scanning modes lead to targeting of compacted chromatin by pioneer factors FOXA1 and SOX2. Cell Rep 42 (7), 112748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Donovan BT et al. (2023) Basic helix-loop-helix pioneer factors interact with the histone octamer to invade nucleosomes and generate nucleosome-depleted regions. Mol Cell 83 (8), 1251–1263.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhu F et al. (2018) The interaction landscape between transcription factors and the nucleosome. Nature 562 (7725), 76–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Donovan BT et al. (2019) Dissociation rate compensation mechanism for budding yeast pioneer transcription factors. Elife 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 54.Garcia DA et al. (2021) An intrinsically disordered region-mediated confinement state contributes to the dynamics and function of transcription factors. Mol Cell 81 (7), 1484–1498.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lerner J et al. (2020) Two-Parameter Mobility Assessments Discriminate Diverse Regulatory Factor Behaviors in Chromatin. Mol Cell 79 (4), 677–688.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Tang X et al. (2022) Kinetic principles underlying pioneer function of GAGA transcription factor in live cells. Nat Struct Mol Biol 29 (7), 665–676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Cirillo LA and Zaret KS (1999) An early developmental transcription factor complex that is more stable on nucleosome core particles than on free DNA. Mol. Cell 4, 961–969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Dodonova SO et al. (2020) Nucleosome-bound SOX2 and SOX11 structures elucidate pioneer factor function. Nature 580 (7805), 669–672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Echigoya K et al. (2020) Nucleosome binding by the pioneer transcription factor OCT4. Sci Rep 10 (1), 11832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Fernandez Garcia M et al. (2019) Structural Features of Transcription Factors Associating with Nucleosome Binding. Mol Cell 75 (5), 921–932.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Frederick MA et al. (2023) A pioneer factor locally opens compacted chromatin to enable targeted ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling. Nat Struct Mol Biol 30 (1), 31–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Huertas J et al. (2020) Nucleosomal DNA Dynamics Mediate Oct4 Pioneer Factor Binding. Biophys J 118 (9), 2280–2296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.MacCarthy CM et al. (2022) OCT4 interprets and enhances nucleosome flexibility. Nucleic Acids Res 50 (18), 10311–10327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Malaga Gadea FC and Nikolova EN (2023) Structural Plasticity of Pioneer Factor Sox2 and DNA Bendability Modulate Nucleosome Engagement and Sox2-Oct4 Synergism. J Mol Biol 435 (2), 167916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Michael AK et al. (2020) Mechanisms of OCT4-SOX2 motif readout on nucleosomes. Science 368 (6498), 1460–1465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Pluta R et al. (2022) Molecular basis for DNA recognition by the maternal pioneer transcription factor FoxH1. Nat Commun 13 (1), 7279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Sinha KK et al. (2023) Histone modifications regulate pioneer transcription factor cooperativity. Nature [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 68.Soufi A et al. (2015) Pioneer transcription factors target partial DNA motifs on nucleosomes to initiate reprogramming. Cell 161 (3), 555–568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Roberts GA et al. (2021) Dissecting OCT4 defines the role of nucleosome binding in pluripotency. Nat Cell Biol 23 (8), 834–845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Ozden B et al. (2023) Molecular Mechanism of Nucleosome Recognition by the Pioneer Transcription Factor Sox. J Chem Inf Model [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 71.Guan R et al. (2023) Structural mechanism of LIN28B nucleosome targeting by OCT4. Mol Cell 83 (12), 1970–1982.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Michael AK et al. (2023) Cooperation between bHLH transcription factors and histones for DNA access. Nature [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 73.Jin R et al. (2021) LEAFY is a pioneer transcription factor and licenses cell reprogramming to floral fate. Nat Commun 12 (1), 626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Mivelaz M et al. (2020) Chromatin Fiber Invasion and Nucleosome Displacement by the Rap1 Transcription Factor. Mol Cell 77 (3), 488–500.e9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Meers MP et al. (2019) Pioneer Factor-Nucleosome Binding Events during Differentiation Are Motif Encoded. Mol Cell 75 (3), 562–575.e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Iwafuchi M et al. (2020) Gene network transitions in embryos depend upon interactions between a pioneer transcription factor and core histones. Nat Genet 52 (4), 418–427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Luzete-Monteiro E and Zaret KS (2022) Structures and consequences of pioneer factor binding to nucleosomes. Curr Opin Struct Biol 75, 102425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.King HW and Klose RJ (2017) The pioneer factor OCT4 requires the chromatin remodeller BRG1 to support gene regulatory element function in mouse embryonic stem cells. Elife 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Minderjahn J et al. (2020) Mechanisms governing the pioneering and redistribution capabilities of the non-classical pioneer PU.1. Nat Commun 11 (1), 402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Chen J et al. (2014) Single-molecule dynamics of enhanceosome assembly in embryonic stem cells. Cell 156 (6), 1274–1285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Mir M et al. (2018) Dynamic multifactor hubs interact transiently with sites of active transcription in Drosophila embryos. Elife 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Cirillo LA et al. (1998) Binding of the winged-helix transcription factor HNF3 to a linker histone site on the nucleosome. EMBO J 17 (1), 244–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Barozzi I et al. (2014) Coregulation of transcription factor binding and nucleosome occupancy through DNA features of mammalian enhancers. Mol Cell 54 (5), 844–857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Kumar DK et al. (2023) Complementary strategies for directing in vivo transcription factor binding through DNA binding domains and intrinsically disordered regions. Mol Cell [DOI] [PubMed]
- 85.Pelletier A et al. (2021) Pax7 pioneer factor action requires both paired and homeo DNA binding domains. Nucleic Acids Res 49 (13), 7424–7436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Boller S et al. (2016) Pioneering Activity of the C-Terminal Domain of EBF1 Shapes the Chromatin Landscape for B Cell Programming. Immunity 44 (3), 527–541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Tan C and Takada S (2020) Nucleosome allostery in pioneer transcription factor binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117 (34), 20586–20596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Brennan KJ et al. (2023) Chromatin accessibility in the Drosophila embryo is determined by transcription factor pioneering and enhancer activation. Dev Cell [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 89.Iwafuchi-Doi M et al. (2016) The Pioneer Transcription Factor FoxA Maintains an Accessible Nucleosome Configuration at Enhancers for Tissue-Specific Gene Activation. Mol Cell 62 (1), 79–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Mayran A et al. (2018) Pioneer factor Pax7 deploys a stable enhancer repertoire for specification of cell fate. Nat Genet 50 (2), 259–269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Li T et al. (2022) Dynamic nucleosome landscape elicits a noncanonical GATA2 pioneer model. Nat Commun 13 (1), 3145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Cirillo LA et al. (2002) Opening of compacted chromatin by early developmental transcription factors HNF3 (FoxA) and GATA-4. Mol Cell 9 (2), 279–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Tsukiyama T et al. (1994) ATP-dependent nucleosome disruption at a heat-shock promoter mediated by binding of GAGA transcription factor. Nature 367 (6463), 525–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Wolf BK et al. (2023) Cooperation of chromatin remodeling SWI/SNF complex and pioneer factor AP-1 shapes 3D enhancer landscapes. Nat Struct Mol Biol 30 (1), 10–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Yang Y et al. (2023) The pioneer factor SOX9 competes for epigenetic factors to switch stem cell fates. Nat Cell Biol [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 96.Wang Y et al. (2020) A Prion-like Domain in Transcription Factor EBF1 Promotes Phase Separation and Enables B Cell Programming of Progenitor Chromatin. Immunity 53 (6), 1151–1167.e6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Chambers C et al. (2023) SWI/SNF Blockade Disrupts PU.1-Directed Enhancer Programs in Normal Hematopoietic Cells and Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Cancer Res 83 (7), 983–996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Judd J et al. (2021) Pioneer-like factor GAF cooperates with PBAP (SWI/SNF) and NURF (ISWI) to regulate transcription. Genes Dev 35 (1–2), 147–156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Xiong L et al. (2022) Oct4 differentially regulates chromatin opening and enhancer transcription in pluripotent stem cells. Elife 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Li R et al. (2018) Dynamic EBF1 occupancy directs sequential epigenetic and transcriptional events in B-cell programming. Genes Dev 32 (2), 96–111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Suzuki T et al. (2017) RUNX1 regulates site specificity of DNA demethylation by recruitment of DNA demethylation machineries in hematopoietic cells. Blood Adv 1 (20), 1699–1711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Tan DS et al. (2023) The homeodomain of Oct4 is a dimeric binder of methylated CpG elements. Nucleic Acids Res 51 (3), 1120–1138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Vanzan L et al. (2021) High throughput screening identifies SOX2 as a super pioneer factor that inhibits DNA methylation maintenance at its binding sites. Nat Commun 12 (1), 3337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Wiench M et al. (2011) DNA methylation status predicts cell type-specific enhancer activity. Embo j 30 (15), 3028–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Yang YA et al. (2016) FOXA1 potentiates lineage-specific enhancer activation through modulating TET1 expression and function. Nucleic Acids Res 44 (17), 8153–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Reizel Y et al. (2021) FoxA-dependent demethylation of DNA initiates epigenetic memory of cellular identity. Dev Cell 56 (5), 602–612.e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Mayran A et al. (2019) Pioneer and nonpioneer factor cooperation drives lineage specific chromatin opening. Nat Commun 10 (1), 3807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Jozwik KM et al. (2016) FOXA1 Directs H3K4 Monomethylation at Enhancers via Recruitment of the Methyltransferase MLL3. Cell Rep 17 (10), 2715–2723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Lee JW et al. (2019) RUNX3 regulates cell cycle-dependent chromatin dynamics by functioning as a pioneer factor of the restriction-point. Nat Commun 10 (1), 1897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Lemma RB et al. (2022) Pioneer transcription factors are associated with the modulation of DNA methylation patterns across cancers. Epigenetics Chromatin 15 (1), 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Magli A et al. (2019) Pax3 cooperates with Ldb1 to direct local chromosome architecture during myogenic lineage specification. Nat Commun 10 (1), 2316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Wang W et al. (2022) TCF-1 promotes chromatin interactions across topologically associating domains in T cell progenitors. Nat Immunol 23 (7), 1052–1062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Christou-Kent M et al. (2023) CEBPA phase separation links transcriptional activity and 3D chromatin hubs. Cell Rep 42 (8), 112897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Boija A et al. (2018) Transcription Factors Activate Genes through the Phase-Separation Capacity of Their Activation Domains. Cell 175 (7), 1842–1855.e16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Kuznetsova K et al. (2023) Nanog organizes transcription bodies. Curr Biol 33 (1), 164–173.e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Hosokawa H et al. (2018) Transcription Factor PU.1 Represses and Activates Gene Expression in Early T Cells by Redirecting Partner Transcription Factor Binding. Immunity 48 (6), 1119–1134.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Chronis C et al. (2017) Cooperative Binding of Transcription Factors Orchestrates Reprogramming. Cell 168 (3), 442–459.e20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Sekiya T and Zaret KS (2007) Repression by Groucho/TLE/Grg proteins: genomic site recruitment generates compacted chromatin in vitro and impairs activator binding in vivo. Mol Cell 28 (2), 291–303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Gregoricchio S et al. (2022) HDAC1 and PRC2 mediate combinatorial control in SPI1/PU.1-dependent gene repression in murine erythroleukaemia. Nucleic Acids Res 50 (14), 7938–7958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Reed-Inderbitzin E et al. (2006) RUNX1 associates with histone deacetylases and SUV39H1 to repress transcription. Oncogene 25 (42), 5777–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Gaskill MM et al. (2023) Localization of the Drosophila pioneer factor GAF to subnuclear foci is driven by DNA binding and required to silence satellite repeat expression. Dev Cell [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 122.Ito K and Zaret KS (2022) Maintaining Transcriptional Specificity Through Mitosis. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 23, 53–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Raccaud M et al. (2019) Mitotic chromosome binding predicts transcription factor properties in interphase. Nat Commun 10 (1), 487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Silvério-Alves R et al. (2023) GATA2 mitotic bookmarking is required for definitive haematopoiesis. Nat Commun 14 (1), 4645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Caravaca JM et al. (2013) Bookmarking by specific and nonspecific binding of FoxA1 pioneer factor to mitotic chromosomes. Genes Dev 27 (3), 251–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Festuccia N et al. (2016) Mitotic binding of Esrrb marks key regulatory regions of the pluripotency network. Nat Cell Biol 18 (11), 1139–1148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Deluz C et al. (2016) A role for mitotic bookmarking of SOX2 in pluripotency and differentiation. Genes Dev 30 (22), 2538–2550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Hovland AS et al. (2022) Pluripotency factors are repurposed to shape the epigenomic landscape of neural crest cells. Dev Cell 57 (19), 2257–2272.e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Vierbuchen T et al. (2017) AP-1 Transcription Factors and the BAF Complex Mediate Signal-Dependent Enhancer Selection. Mol Cell 68 (6), 1067–1082.e12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Larson ED et al. (2021) Cell-type-specific chromatin occupancy by the pioneer factor Zelda drives key developmental transitions in Drosophila Nat Commun 12 (1), 7153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Li S et al. (2019) Nonreciprocal and Conditional Cooperativity Directs the Pioneer Activity of Pluripotency Transcription Factors. Cell Rep 28 (10), 2689–2703.e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Tanaka H et al. (2020) Interaction of the pioneer transcription factor GATA3 with nucleosomes. Nat Commun 11 (1), 4136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Liu Z and Kraus WL (2017) Catalytic-Independent Functions of PARP-1 Determine Sox2 Pioneer Activity at Intractable Genomic Loci. Mol Cell 65 (4), 589–603.e9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Sharma A et al. (2020) GATA6 mutations in hiPSCs inform mechanisms for maldevelopment of the heart, pancreas, and diaphragm. Elife 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Nguyen T et al. (2022) Chromatin sequesters pioneer transcription factor Sox2 from exerting force on DNA. Nat Commun 13 (1), 3988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Sharma R et al. (2021) Liquid condensation of reprogramming factor KLF4 with DNA provides a mechanism for chromatin organization. Nat Commun 12 (1), 5579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Kang H et al. (2018) Sequence-dependent DNA condensation as a driving force of DNA phase separation. Nucleic Acids Res 46 (18), 9401–9413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Pownall ME et al. (2023) Chromatin expansion microscopy reveals nanoscale organization of transcription and chromatin. Science 381 (6653), 92–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Dufourt J et al. (2018) Temporal control of gene expression by the pioneer factor Zelda through transient interactions in hubs. Nat Commun 9 (1), 5194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Isbel L et al. (2023) Readout of histone methylation by Trim24 locally restricts chromatin opening by p53. Nat Struct Mol Biol [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 141.Bullerwell CE et al. (2021) EBF1 drives hallmark B cell gene expression by enabling the interaction of PAX5 with the MLL H3K4 methyltransferase complex. Sci Rep 11 (1), 1537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Bunina D et al. (2020) Genomic Rewiring of SOX2 Chromatin Interaction Network during Differentiation of ESCs to Postmitotic Neurons. Cell Syst 10 (6), 480–494.e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Zhang S et al. (2019) OCT4 and PAX6 determine the dual function of SOX2 in human ESCs as a key pluripotent or neural factor. Stem Cell Res Ther 10 (1), 122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Jacobs J et al. (2018) The transcription factor Grainy head primes epithelial enhancers for spatiotemporal activation by displacing nucleosomes. Nat Genet 50 (7), 1011–1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Johnson TA et al. (2018) Conventional and pioneer modes of glucocorticoid receptor interaction with enhancer chromatin in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res 46 (1), 203–214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Wang A et al. (2015) Epigenetic priming of enhancers predicts developmental competence of hESC-derived endodermal lineage intermediates. Cell Stem Cell 16 (4), 386–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Gualdi R et al. (1996) Hepatic specification of the gut endoderm in vitro: cell signaling and transcriptional control. Genes Dev 10 (13), 1670–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Zhang S et al. (2022) H3K27ac nucleosomes facilitate HMGN localization at regulatory sites to modulate chromatin binding of transcription factors. Commun Biol 5 (1), 159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Fuglerud BM et al. (2018) The pioneer factor activity of c-Myb involves recruitment of p300 and induction of histone acetylation followed by acetylation-induced chromatin dissociation. Epigenetics Chromatin 11 (1), 35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Kaemena DF et al. (2023) B1 SINE-binding ZFP266 impedes mouse iPSC generation through suppression of chromatin opening mediated by reprogramming factors. Nat Commun 14 (1), 488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Ali FR et al. (2020) Dephosphorylation of the Proneural Transcription Factor ASCL1 Re-Engages a Latent Post-Mitotic Differentiation Program in Neuroblastoma. Mol Cancer Res 18 (12), 1759–1766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Gao S et al. (2020) Chromatin binding of FOXA1 is promoted by LSD1-mediated demethylation in prostate cancer. Nat Genet 52 (10), 1011–1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Loffreda A et al. (2017) Live-cell p53 single-molecule binding is modulated by C-terminal acetylation and correlates with transcriptional activity. Nat Commun 8 (1), 313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Sincennes MC et al. (2021) Acetylation of PAX7 controls muscle stem cell self-renewal and differentiation potential in mice. Nat Commun 12 (1), 3253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Woods LM et al. (2022) Elevated ASCL1 activity creates de novo regulatory elements associated with neuronal differentiation. BMC Genomics 23 (1), 255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Wu TF et al. (2015) Loading of PAX3 to Mitotic Chromosomes Is Mediated by Arginine Methylation and Associated with Waardenburg Syndrome. J Biol Chem 290 (33), 20556–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Oksuz O et al. (2023) Transcription factors interact with RNA to regulate genes. Mol Cell [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
