Abstract
In multicellular organisms, cell-to-cell communication is critical for the regulation of tissue organization. Notch signaling relies on direct interactions between Notch receptors on signal-receiving cells and Notch ligands on adjacent cells. Notch evolved to mediate local cellular interactions that are responsive to spatial cues via dosage-sensitive short-lived signals. Immune cells utilize these unique properties of Notch signaling to direct their development, differentiation, and function. In this review, we explore how immune cells interact through Notch receptors with stromal cells in specialized niches of lymphohematopoietic organs that express Notch-activating ligands. We emphasize factors that control these interactions and focus on how Notch signals communicate spatial, quantitative, and temporal information to program the function of signal-receiving cells in the immune system.
Introduction
Notch receptors are single-pass transmembrane receptors expressed on the surface of signal-receiving cells. They are activated when bound by Notch ligands on the surface of adjacent cells, allowing for truly local signaling interactions. Notch activation leads to conformational changes that trigger consecutive receptor cleavage by the ADAM10 metalloprotease and by the γ-secretase multiprotein complex, composed of presenilins (PSEN1/PSEN2), nicastrin (NCT), anterior pharynx-defective 1 (APH-1) and presenilin enhancer 2 (PEN-2). Notch cleavage by ADAM10 at a specific site in the extracellular domain and then by γ-secretase in the transmembrane region free the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) to translocate into the nucleus (Figure 1) [1]. NICD associates with the RBPJ transcription factor and a Mastermind-like family protein before recruiting co-activators to promote increased target gene transcription [1]. Cleaved NICD is rapidly degraded, which ensures delivery of precise time and dosage-sensitive messages to signal-receiving cells [2] (Figure 1). This mechanism of action makes Notch signaling a rational system for position sensing, patterning and cell fate decisions, as best established during embryonic development [3,4].
Figure 1. Overview of the Notch pathway and its signaling properties.

Notch signaling evolved to communicate information between adjacent cells. In the immune system, specialized stromal cells that build the structure of lymphohematopoietic organs express Notch ligands on their surface and interact with Notch receptors in hematopoietic and immune cells, passing along positional information. Ligand-receptor binding causes conformational changes in the receptor allowing for proteolytic release of the Notch intracellular domain (NICD). NICD translocates to the nucleus where it binds the RBPJ transcription factor, recruits a Mastermind-like (MAML) co-activator and induces transcriptional activation. Differential abundance of ligands or receptors and distinct ligand-receptor pairs affect the dose of Notch signal sensed by signal-receiving cells, transferring quantitative information. Once cleaved, NICD is rapidly ubiquitinated and degraded by the proteasome. Given NICD’s short half-life, persistent expression of Notch receptors and contact with ligand-expressing cells are essential for continued signaling, thus relaying time-sensitive information.
The emergence of multicellular organisms vastly increased life diversity on Earth. Ancient multicellular species developed a toolbox for intercellular communication that included the Notch pathway. Ancestral protein domains resembling those seen in Notch (e.g. epidermal growth factor-like repeats and ankyrin domains) exist across various proteins in unicellular organisms [5,6], but modern Notch receptors only emerged in the common ancestor of metazoans [7,8]. Proteins like γ-secretase that are vital to the pathway’s function may have been coopted from more ancient ancestors [7]. Notch signaling is vital throughout development and is highly conserved in the animal kingdom, even in primitive nonbilaterian species like sponges and hydra [9]. Thus, Notch evolution is intimately linked to multicellular systems.
While Drosophila, the organism in which Notch signaling was discovered, only has one Notch receptor and two Notch ligands, more complex organisms harbor additional receptors and ligands [1]. Receptors can be differentially glycosylated, increasing functional diversity [10]. In higher organisms, a mechanical force is needed to unmask the metalloprotease cleavage site during Notch activation [11]. Recent work showed that the required force threshold is mediated by a “leucine plug” found in Drosophila and vertebrates, but not in lower organisms such as C. elegans where an endocytic pulling force is not required to activate Notch [12]. Ancient ankyrin domains evolved in a species-specific manner to regulate NICD’s sensitivity and stability in response to changes in temperature [13,14]. The increased complexity of Notch signaling acquired over evolutionary time fine-tuned its versatility.
This review focuses on the role of Notch signaling in cells of the mammalian immune system with an emphasis on lymphohematopoietic organs. Notch plays critical roles at multiple stages of hematopoietic and immune cell development from the emergence of hematopoietic stem cells in the embryo to their development, differentiation and function in the fetal liver, bone marrow, thymus, spleen, and lymph nodes. We explore how immune cells interact with specialized structural cells in their microenvironment (Figure 2) and how Notch signaling facilitates communication of time-sensitive and quantitative positional information with profound effects on immune function (Figure 3).
Figure 2. Cellular specificity of Notch receptor-ligand interactions.

Notch ligands and receptors are expressed by a variety of cell types, yet only specific ligand-receptor pairs on distinct cell types effectively activate Notch signaling. We postulate that chemokines and cytokines potentiate Notch signaling in appropriate contexts by recruiting and sustaining receptor-expressing hematopoietic cells in specific ligand-expressing niches (1). Specialized stromal cells are a recurrent, established source of Notch-activating ligands that bind Notch receptors expressed on hematopoietic cells (2). Hematopoietic cells can also express Notch ligands and may play an important role in communicating signals to other hematopoietic cells in certain contexts, for example interactions between immature myeloid cells and developing hematopoietic stem cells in the fetal liver (3). Stromal elements may also use Notch signaling to communicate between themselves within lymphohematopoietic niches, for example in interactions between thymic epithelial cells in the developing thymus and between endothelial cells in the BM (4).
Figure 3. Examples of stromal niche-driven Notch signaling in the immune system.

(A) In the thymus, thymic epithelial cells express Dll4 Notch ligands to activate Notch1-mediated signaling in thymus seeding progenitors (TSPs) and downstream early T lineage progenitors, promoting T lineage development. In the absence of Notch signaling, TSPs adopt alternative cell fates. (B) In the spleen, specialized Ccl19-Cre+ fibroblastic reticular cells serve as a source of Dll1 ligands to activate Notch2 in transitional B cells and instruct marginal zone B cell development. Continuous exposure to Dll1 is necessary to sustain marginal zone B cell positioning and function, and access to Dll1 Notch ligands is enhanced in lymphopenia. (C) Within lymph nodes, Ccl19-Cre+ fibroblastic reticular cells serve as a source of Dll4 Notch ligands to promote a T follicular helper cell (Tfh) response upon antigen exposure. Tfh assist B cells in germinal center reactions to promote affinity maturation and long-lasting antibody responses, for example in the setting of vaccination.
Role of Notch signaling in the emergence of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs)
In vertebrates, embryonic HSCs originate in the ventral aorta and selected other arteries. HSCs develop with other early hematopoietic progenitors from hemogenic endothelial cells that generate intra-aortic hematopoietic clusters. Notch signaling plays a dosage-sensitive role in directing cells towards an HSC fate [15–18]. Cells receiving high intensity Delta-like ligand 4 (Dll4)-driven Notch signals adopt an endothelial fate, while those receiving lower intensity Jagged1 (Jag1)-driven Notch signals adopt a hematopoietic fate [15] (Figure 1). Recent work showed that positioning of Notch ligands within hematopoietic clusters regulates these differentiation patterns. Dll4-expressing cells, located on the luminal layer of the aorta, restrained hematopoietic cluster growth, while Jag1 expression within clusters allowed their expansion [19]. Additionally, single-cell RNA sequencing demonstrated a transition from Notch1 to Notch2 expression as cells developed into pre-HSCs from hemogenic endothelium. In vitro, this transition was supported by immobilized agonistic anti-Notch1 and Notch2 antibodies, but not immobilized Dll4 alone [20]. Later in fetal life, hematopoietic cells themselves may also serve as an important source of Jag1 to HSCs in the fetal liver, as its absence decreased expression of HSC-specific genes, resulting in reduced engraftment after transplantation [21].
Together, these data suggest that distinct Notch ligands can impart different quantitative signal strengths and cell fate outcomes (Figure 1). Future work will help determine how signal strength affects patterns of individual Notch target gene expression. Non-hematopoietic cells serve as a vital source of Notch ligands in HSC development, but it remains less clear to what extent and in what contexts other cell types (e.g. other hematopoietic cells [21]) also contribute. Additional factors such as chemokines and cytokines might facilitate recruitment and retention of signal-receiving hematopoietic cells, thus magnifying the effects of specific microenvironmental niches expressing Notch ligands (Figure 2).
Bone marrow (BM)
In adult mammals, hematopoiesis is maintained by hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in the BM. The BM space includes distinct niches that instruct HSCs to self-renew or differentiate into downstream progenitors with various degrees of myeloid and lymphoid potential. Delta-like and Jagged ligands expressed in BM stromal compartments are potential regulators of hematopoiesis and BM niche homeostasis [22–25]. However, only low intensity Notch activation is seen physiologically in HSCs and Notch’s role remains controversial [26]. Some studies reported that Notch signaling within the BM is important for maintenance of the HSC pool [22,23]. However, others showed that Notch signaling is non-essential for HSC maintenance [26,27]. Leukemia/lymphoma-related factor (LRF, encoded by the Zbtb7a gene), a member of the POZ domain Krüppel-like zinc finger (POK) family of transcriptional repressors, normally suppresses Dll4 expression in erythroid cells [28]. De-repression of Dll4 expression in erythroblasts of LRF-deficient mice led to Notch-driven extrathymic T cell development, highlighting how exposure to Notch ligands and Notch signaling intensity in HSCs may normally be limited through active mechanisms [28,29]. Notch signaling may also play a role extrinsic to hematopoietic cells in regulating cross-talk between stromal cells that compose the BM niche [30] (Figure 2).
HSCs give rise to downstream progenitors with distinct differentiation potential that ultimately produce mature hematopoietic cells. During regenerative hematopoiesis, Dll1 and Dll4 expression in BM endothelial cells was reported to promote lymphoid at the expense of myeloid development [25]. Dll4 expression was also described in osteocalcin+ osteoblast lineage cells, where its conditional deletion impaired common lymphoid progenitors (CLP) with high T cell development potential [24]. Additional work supports the idea that increased exposure to Notch signaling promotes a lymphoid and pre-T cell fate in hematopoietic progenitors even upstream of the thymus [24,31,32]. In a mouse model of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, Notch signaling increased IL-21R expression, and transplanted IL-21-stimulated T cell progenitors proliferated more rapidly and colonized the host thymus more efficiently, leading to enhanced reconstitution of the host spleen and lymph nodes with donor-derived T cells [33]. In another system, a transplanted ectopic artificial BM scaffold containing Dll4 promoted more robust CLP and thymocyte generation, and improved systemic T cell reconstitution after BM transplantation [34]. T cell generation was much more efficient when BMP2 was also incorporated into the scaffold [34], consistent with the observation that Notch ligands cooperate with cytokines and chemokines in Notch ligand-expressing niches [35] (Figure 2).
Thymus
Thymus-seeding progenitors (TSP) migrate from the BM to the thymic corticomedullary junction, where they enter the thymus through specialized venules and encounter Notch ligands on thymic epithelial cells (TEC). TSPs enter the thymus in response to chemokine receptor CCR7/9-mediated signals from TEC-secreted chemokines [36]. TSPs require Dll4-mediated Notch1 signals to initiate and sustain the T cell transcriptional program [37–39] and shut off alternative differentiation potential [31,38,40] (Figure 3A). T cell progenitor migration through thymic niches is also influenced by Notch signals [41].
Single cell genomics data providing insights into human thymopoiesis suggest that TSPs arrive in the thymus with broad differentiation potential before high intensity Notch activation commits them to the T cell lineage [42]. Early T lineage progenitors can be divided into unique subsets that are poised for different trajectories within the thymus [42], perhaps reflecting signals (including Notch activation) received within the BM, as discussed above. Recent work in mice shows that an early thymocyte-specific enhancer controls Notch1 expression and its deletion leads to accelerated differentiation outpacing induction of lineage-restricting signals and leading to abnormal thymic production of pro-B and NK cells at the expense of T lineage cells [43]. Different Notch ligand-receptor interactions and their resulting signal strength may also direct early T lineage progenitors [42,44,45]. Interestingly, in the absence of key FoxN1-driven chemokines and cytokines including stem cell factor and CCL25, Delta-like ligands were inefficient at directing T cell fate in the thymus [35], suggesting that chemokines and cytokines were necessary to potentiate Notch signaling. These data suggest that chemokines attract and cytokines support progenitors in specialized stromal niches, where they then come into contact with rare ligand-expressing stromal cells capable of potently transducing Notch signals (Figure 2) [35,36]. Conversely, other sources of Notch ligands may be ineffective in the absence of cytokine and chemokine secretion.
Notch receptors and activating ligands also appear to play a critical role in determining cell fates of the TECs themselves [46] analogous to their effects within the BM niche described above [30,47] (Figure 2). Notch signaling was reported to regulate FoxN1 expression, which functions as a master regulator of TECs, and promote medullary TEC differentiation [48,49]. The absence of early T lineage progenitors disrupts normal thymic architecture [32], demonstrating the importance of cross-talk between stromal and hematopoietic cells in regulating immune cell development and stromal niche function.
Spleen and lymph nodes
Notch signaling plays a continued role in the function of mature lymphocytes in secondary lymphoid organs (SLOs). Specialized subsets of non-hematopoietic fibroblastic reticular cells (FRCs) support the structure of spleen and lymph nodes, but also communicate important information to immune cells. FRCs express Notch ligands that control lymphocyte responses to a variety of stimuli in SLOs [50] akin to TECs interacting with lymphoid progenitors in the thymus (Figure 3B–C). In the spleen, Dll1 expression in Ccl19-Cre+ FRCs, but not endothelial or hematopoietic cells, was required for the homeostasis of marginal zone B cells, a population of naïve mature B cells with innate-like characteristics [51,52]. Chemokines and cytokines secreted by FRCs may be important to sustain their capacity to deliver Notch signals to B cells and other targets (as seen in BM [34] and thymic stromal niches [35,36]) (Figure 2). After transfer of mature follicular B cells into lymphopenic recipients, Notch2-Dll1 interactions between B cells and splenic FRCs induced transdifferentiation into marginal zone B cells [53] (Figure 3B). Importantly, this process was heightened in lymphopenic as compared with lymphoid-replete mice, suggesting increased access to the Dll1+ niche in the setting of lymphopenia, which may serve as a regulatory mechanism to sense and regulate B cell pool size. Functionally, sustained Notch signaling in marginal zone B cells primed them for rapid plasma cell differentiation supported by Myc and mTORC signaling [54]. This regulation may extend from naïve to memory B cells, as seen in spleens from cadaveric organ donors previously immunized against smallpox where a population of long-lived antigen-specific memory B cells also had a Notch-Myc signature [55].
In lymph nodes, stroma-derived Dll4 drives Notch activation in naïve T cells to promote differentiation to T follicular helper cells after immunization [51,56] (Figure 3C). Notch signaling also acts as a key regulator of CD8+ T cell fate. Notch signaling promotes short-lived effector T cell differentiation in response to influenza [57], Listeria, and dendritic cell immunization [58]. In the context of graft-versus-host disease, the main immunological complication of allogeneic bone marrow or hematopoietic cell transplantation, stromal Delta-like ligands prime donor T cells for alloimmune reactivity during a short time window following transplantation by driving a pro-inflammatory T cell phenotype and inhibiting regulatory T cell expansion [59–61]. Stroma-derived Notch signals also play an important role in regulating cell surface integrins controlling homing of alloreactive T cells to the gut in mice and non-human primates [62]. A single dose of anti-Dll4 antibody at the time of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation was sufficient to prevent the deleterious effects of graft-versus-host disease in the gastrointestinal tract, among the most common and most morbid sites of disease [62].
Conclusions and perspectives
Specialized stromal cells are critical as a source of Notch ligands across lymphohematopoietic organs, as best shown for epithelial cells in the thymus and FRCs in SLOs. Although Notch-activating ligands are present elsewhere (e.g. in endothelial cells), individual cell types diverge in their capacity to engage signal-receiving cells. As a common rule of engagement that defines potent Notch ligand-expressing niches, we speculate that niche-specific factors including chemokines and cytokines are necessary to prime signal-receiving cells to efficiently accept Notch signals [34,35,51] (Figure 2). Expression of Notch ligands in stromal cells embedded in a fixed anatomical space may also provide favorable biophysical properties to deliver Notch signals, while conveying positional information.
Disordered Notch signaling in lymphocytes can cause lymphomagenesis. In chronic lymphocytic leukemia [63,64], marginal zone lymphoma [65,66], and peripheral T cell lymphomas [67], cancerous cells hijack signals from ligand-expressing cells within their local niche to drive aberrant Notch signaling. Interestingly, the requirement for Notch ligands and other local signals appeared to be critical in this process, even in patients with Notch-activating mutations, as active Notch was only detected within the lymph nodes and was lost abruptly in cells extending outside these encapsulated areas [63,65,67]. Thus, local cell-to-cell contacts building on physiological signals may sustain lymphoma proliferation and be potential targets for intervention.
In summary, Notch signaling has evolved as a critical tool for cell-to-cell communication in multicellular organisms. Over evolutionary time, the pathway has been fine-tuned to allow for precise, tightly regulated communication between adjacent cells. It has been coopted by cells of the immune system to transmit spatial, quantitative, and temporal information from structural cells in lymphohematopoietic organs to hematopoietic cells (Figure 1). Notch likely acts in tandem with other signals from cytokines and chemokines to attract immune cells to appropriate niches and in certain contexts may communicate information directly between stromal cells or between hematopoietic cells (Figure 2). This signaling pathway is essential for the development, differentiation, and function of multiple immune cell subsets in the BM, thymus, spleen, and lymph nodes (Figure 3).
Disclosures
Work on Notch signaling in the Maillard laboratory is supported by National Institutes of Health (R01-AI091627 to I.M.). M.S. is supported by T32-CA009615. I.M. has received research funding from Genentech and Regeneron, and he is a member of Garuda Therapeutics’ scientific advisory board.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Kopan R, Ilagan MXG: The canonical Notch signaling pathway: unfolding the activation mechanism. Cell 2009, 137:216–233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Housden BE, Fu AQ, Krejci A, Bernard F, Fischer B, Tavaré S, Russell S, Bray SJ: Transcriptional dynamics elicited by a short pulse of notch activation involves feed-forward regulation by E (spl)/Hes genes. PLoS genetics 2013, 9:e1003162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Reichrath J, Reichrath S: Notch signaling and embryonic development: an ancient friend, revisited. Notch Signaling in Embryology and Cancer: Notch Signaling in Embryology 2020:9–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Guruharsha K, Kankel MW, Artavanis-Tsakonas S: The Notch signalling system: recent insights into the complexity of a conserved pathway. Nature Reviews Genetics 2012, 13:654–666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shalchian-Tabrizi K, Minge MA, Espelund M, Orr R, Ruden T, Jakobsen KS, Cavalier-Smith T: Multigene phylogeny of choanozoa and the origin of animals. PloS one 2008, 3:e2098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Suga H, Chen Z, De Mendoza A, Sebé-Pedrós A, Brown MW, Kramer E, Carr M, Kerner P, Vervoort M, Sánchez-Pons N: The Capsaspora genome reveals a complex unicellular prehistory of animals. Nature communications 2013, 4:2325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gazave E, Lapébie P, Richards GS, Brunet F, Ereskovsky AV, Degnan BM, Borchiellini C, Vervoort M, Renard E: Origin and evolution of the Notch signalling pathway: an overview from eukaryotic genomes. BMC evolutionary biology 2009, 9:1–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Richards G, Degnan B: The dawn of developmental signaling in the metazoa. In Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: 2009:81–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Käsbauer T, Towb P, Alexandrova O, David CN, Dall’Armi E, Staudigl A, Stiening B, Böttger A: The Notch signaling pathway in the cnidarian Hydra. Developmental biology 2007, 303:376–390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Takeuchi H, Haltiwanger RS: Significance of glycosylation in Notch signaling. Biochemical and biophysical research communications 2014, 453:235–242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gordon WR, Zimmerman B, He L, Miles LJ, Huang J, Tiyanont K, McArthur DG, Aster JC, Perrimon N, Loparo JJ: Mechanical allostery: evidence for a force requirement in the proteolytic activation of Notch. Developmental cell 2015, 33:729–736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Langridge PD, Diaz AG, Chan JY, Greenwald I, Struhl G: Evolutionary plasticity in the requirement for force exerted by ligand endocytosis to activate C. elegans Notch proteins. Current Biology 2022, 32:2263–2271. e2266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nomura T, Nagao K, Shirai R, Gotoh H, Umeda M, Ono K: Temperature sensitivity of Notch signaling underlies species-specific developmental plasticity and robustness in amniote brains. Nature Communications 2022, 13:96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Vujovic F, Hunter N, Farahani RM: Notch ankyrin domain: evolutionary rise of a thermodynamic sensor. Cell Communication and Signaling 2022, 20:66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gama-Norton L, Ferrando E, Ruiz-Herguido C, Liu Z, Guiu J, Islam AB, Lee S-U, Yan M, Guidos CJ, López-Bigas N: Notch signal strength controls cell fate in the haemogenic endothelium. Nature communications 2015, 6:8510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Robert-Moreno À, Guiu J, Ruiz-Herguido C, López ME, Inglés-Esteve J, Riera L, Tipping A, Enver T, Dzierzak E, Gridley T: Impaired embryonic haematopoiesis yet normal arterial development in the absence of the Notch ligand Jagged1. The EMBO journal 2008, 27:1886–1895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hadland BK, Huppert SS, Kanungo J, Xue Y, Jiang R, Gridley T, Conlon RA, Cheng AM, Kopan R, Longmore GD: A requirement for Notch1 distinguishes 2 phases of definitive hematopoiesis during development. Blood 2004, 104:3097–3105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kumano K, Chiba S, Kunisato A, Sata M, Saito T, Nakagami-Yamaguchi E, Yamaguchi T, Masuda S, Shimizu K, Takahashi T: Notch1 but not Notch2 is essential for generating hematopoietic stem cells from endothelial cells. Immunity 2003, 18:699–711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Porcheri C, Golan O, Calero-Nieto FJ, Thambyrajah R, Ruiz-Herguido C, Wang X, Catto F, Guillén Y, Sinha R, González J: Notch ligand Dll4 impairs cell recruitment to aortic clusters and limits blood stem cell generation. The EMBO Journal 2020, 39:e104270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Using in vivo imaging, RNA sequencing, and computational modeling, this work uncovers how Notch activating ligands within the embryonic ventral aorta precisely regulate the recruitment of hemogenic endothelial cells destined to become hematopoietic stem cells, with Dll4 Notch ligands limiting the recruitment of these precursors to intraaortic hematopoietic clusters.
- 20.Hadland B, Varnum-Finney B, Dozono S, Dignum T, Nourigat-McKay C, Heck AM, Ishida T, Jackson DL, Itkin T, Butler JM: Engineering a niche supporting hematopoietic stem cell development using integrated single-cell transcriptomics. Nature Communications 2022, 13:1584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; The authors examine interactions between the arterial vascular niche and the hemogenic endothelium using single cell RNA sequencing. They show that, as cells mature to pre-HSCs/HSCs, they transition from high levels of Notch1 expression to Notch2 expression, thus altering ligand preferences and the magnitude of downstream target gene activation.
- 21.Shao L, Paik NY, Sanborn MA, Bandara T, Vijaykumar A, Sottoriva K, Rehman J, Nombela-Arrieta C, Pajcini KV: Hematopoietic Jagged1 is a fetal liver niche factor required for functional maturation and engraftment of fetal hematopoietic stem cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2023, 120:e2210058120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Calvi L, Adams G, Weibrecht K, Weber J, Olson D, Knight M, Martin R, Schipani E, Divieti P, Bringhurst FR: Osteoblastic cells regulate the haematopoietic stem cell niche. Nature 2003, 425:841–846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Poulos MG, Guo P, Kofler NM, Pinho S, Gutkin MC, Tikhonova A, Aifantis I, Frenette PS, Kitajewski J, Rafii S: Endothelial Jagged-1 is necessary for homeostatic and regenerative hematopoiesis. Cell reports 2013, 4:1022–1034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yu VW, Saez B, Cook C, Lotinun S, Pardo-Saganta A, Wang Y-H, Lymperi S, Ferraro F, Raaijmakers MH, Wu JY: Specific bone cells produce DLL4 to generate thymus-seeding progenitors from bone marrow. Journal of Experimental Medicine 2015, 212:759–774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tikhonova AN, Dolgalev I, Hu H, Sivaraj KK, Hoxha E, Cuesta-Domínguez Á, Pinho S, Akhmetzyanova I, Gao J, Witkowski M: The bone marrow microenvironment at single-cell resolution. Nature 2019, 569:222–228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Maillard I, Koch U, Dumortier A, Shestova O, Xu L, Sai H, Pross SE, Aster JC, Bhandoola A, Radtke F: Canonical notch signaling is dispensable for the maintenance of adult hematopoietic stem cells. Cell stem cell 2008, 2:356–366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Duarte S, Woll PS, Buza-Vidas N, Chin DWL, Boukarabila H, Luís TC, Stenson L, Bouriez-Jones T, Ferry H, Mead AJ: Canonical Notch signaling is dispensable for adult steady-state and stress myelo-erythropoiesis. Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology 2018, 131:1712–1719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lee S-U, Maeda M, Ishikawa Y, Li SM, Wilson A, Jubb AM, Sakurai N, Weng L, Fiorini E, Radtke F: LRF-mediated Dll4 repression in erythroblasts is necessary for hematopoietic stem cell maintenance. Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology 2013, 121:918–929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Maeda T, Merghoub T, Hobbs RM, Dong L, Maeda M, Zakrzewski J, Van Den Brink MR, Zelent A, Shigematsu H, Akashi K: Regulation of B versus T lymphoid lineage fate decision by the proto-oncogene LRF. Science 2007, 316:860–866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Shao L, Sottoriva K, Palasiewicz K, Zhang J, Hyun J, Soni SS, Paik NY, Gao X, Cuervo H, Malik AB: A Tie2-Notch1 signaling axis regulates regeneration of the endothelial bone marrow niche. Haematologica 2019, 104:2164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wilson A, MacDonald HR, Radtke F: Notch 1–deficient common lymphoid precursors adopt a B cell fate in the thymus. The Journal of experimental medicine 2001, 194:1003–1012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chen EL, Thompson PK, Zúñiga-Pflücker JC: RBPJ-dependent Notch signaling initiates the T cell program in a subset of thymus-seeding progenitors. Nature immunology 2019, 20:1456–1468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sottoriva K, Paik NY, White Z, Bandara T, Shao L, Sano T, Pajcini KV: A Notch/IL-21 signaling axis primes bone marrow T cell progenitor expansion. JCI insight 2022, 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shah NJ, Mao AS, Shih T-Y, Kerr MD, Sharda A, Raimondo TM, Weaver JC, Vrbanac VD, Deruaz M, Tager AM: An injectable bone marrow–like scaffold enhances T cell immunity after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Nature biotechnology 2019, 37:293–302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Calderón L, Boehm T: Synergistic, context-dependent, and hierarchical functions of epithelial components in thymic microenvironments. Cell 2012, 149:159–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Schwarz BA, Sambandam A, Maillard I, Harman BC, Love PE, Bhandoola A: Selective thymus settling regulated by cytokine and chemokine receptors. The Journal of Immunology 2007, 178:2008–2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hozumi K, Mailhos C, Negishi N, Hirano K-i, Yahata T, Ando K, Zuklys S, Holländer GA, Shima DT, Habu S: Delta-like 4 is indispensable in thymic environment specific for T cell development. The Journal of experimental medicine 2008, 205:2507–2513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Radtke F, Wilson A, Stark G, Bauer M, van Meerwijk J, MacDonald HR, Aguet M: Deficient T cell fate specification in mice with an induced inactivation of Notch1. Immunity 1999, 10:547–558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Koch U, Fiorini E, Benedito R, Besseyrias V, Schuster-Gossler K, Pierres M, Manley NR, Duarte A, MacDonald HR, Radtke F: Delta-like 4 is the essential, nonredundant ligand for Notch1 during thymic T cell lineage commitment. The Journal of experimental medicine 2008, 205:2515–2523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.De Obaldia ME, Bell JJ, Wang X, Harly C, Yashiro-Ohtani Y, DeLong JH, Zlotoff DA, Sultana DA, Pear WS, Bhandoola A: T cell development requires constraint of the myeloid regulator C/EBP-α by the Notch target and transcriptional repressor Hes1. Nature immunology 2013, 14:1277–1284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Aghaallaei N, Dick AM, Tsingos E, Inoue D, Hasel E, Thumberger T, Toyoda A, Leptin M, Wittbrodt J, Bajoghli B: αβ/γδ T cell lineage outcome is regulated by intrathymic cell localization and environmental signals. Science Advances 2021, 7:eabg3613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Cordes M, Canté-Barrett K, van den Akker EB, Moretti FA, Kiełbasa SM, Vloemans SA, Garcia-Perez L, Teodosio C, van Dongen JJ, Pike-Overzet K: Single-cell immune profiling reveals thymus-seeding populations, T cell commitment, and multilineage development in the human thymus. Science immunology 2022, 7:eade0182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Single cell transcriptomics data uncovered three unique populations of thymus-seeding progenitors with distinct differentiation potentials in the human thymus with evidence of active Notch signaling. These findings mirror earlier work in mice showing that Notch ligands expressed by thymic epithelial cells control T lineage commitment and progression through early stages of T cell development.
- 43.Kashiwagi M, Figueroa DS, Ay F, Morgan BA, Georgopoulos K: A double-negative thymocyte-specific enhancer augments Notch1 signaling to direct early T cell progenitor expansion, lineage restriction and β-selection. Nature Immunology 2022:1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Early thymocytes contain an upstream enhancer that is required for Notch1 expression and T cell lineage restriction. Inactivation of this enhancer decreased the efficiency of T cell development, and led to accumulation of B cell progenitors and innate immune cells in the thymus.
- 44.Lehar SM, Dooley J, Farr AG, Bevan MJ: Notch ligands Delta1 and Jagged1 transmit distinct signals to T-cell precursors. Blood 2005, 105:1440–1447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Dolens AC, Durinck K, Lavaert M, Van der Meulen J, Velghe I, De Medts J, Weening K, Roels J, De Mulder K, Volders PJ: Distinct Notch1 and BCL11B requirements mediate human γδ/αβ T cell development. EMBO reports 2020, 21:e49006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Bautista JL, Cramer NT, Miller CN, Chavez J, Berrios DI, Byrnes LE, Germino J, Ntranos V, Sneddon JB, Burt TD: Single-cell transcriptional profiling of human thymic stroma uncovers novel cellular heterogeneity in the thymic medulla. Nature Communications 2021, 12:1096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This work uses single cell transcriptomics to suggest an important role of Notch signaling in the differentiation and maintenance of thymic epithelial cells, in addition to its role in early thymocyte development.
- 47.Vanderbeck AN, Maillard I: Notch in the niche: new insights into the role of Notch signaling in the bone marrow. haematologica 2019, 104:2117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Liu D, Kousa AI, O’Neill KE, Rouse P, Popis M, Farley AM, Tomlinson SR, Ulyanchenko S, Guillemot F, Seymour PA: Canonical Notch signaling controls the early thymic epithelial progenitor cell state and emergence of the medullary epithelial lineage in fetal thymus development. Development 2020, 147:dev178582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Li J, Gordon J, Chen EL, Xiao S, Wu L, Zúñiga-Pflücker JC, Manley NR: NOTCH1 signaling establishes the medullary thymic epithelial cell progenitor pool during mouse fetal development. Development 2020, 147:dev178988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Perez-Shibayama C, Gil-Cruz C, Ludewig B: Fibroblastic reticular cells at the nexus of innate and adaptive immune responses. Immunological reviews 2019, 289:31–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Fasnacht N, Huang H-Y, Koch U, Favre S, Auderset F, Chai Q, Onder L, Kallert S, Pinschewer DD, MacDonald HR: Specific fibroblastic niches in secondary lymphoid organs orchestrate distinct Notch-regulated immune responses. Journal of Experimental Medicine 2014, 211:2265–2279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Tan JB, Xu K, Cretegny K, Visan I, Yuan JS, Egan SE, Guidos CJ: Lunatic and manic fringe cooperatively enhance marginal zone B cell precursor competition for delta-like 1 in splenic endothelial niches. Immunity 2009, 30:254–263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gómez Atria D, Gaudette BT, Londregan J, Kelly S, Perkey E, Allman A, Srivastava B, Koch U, Radtke F, Ludewig B: Stromal Notch ligands foster lymphopenia-driven functional plasticity and homeostatic proliferation of naive B cells. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 2022, 132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This work demonstrates that access to stroma-derived Dll1 Notch ligands controls Notch2 signaling in naïve splenic B cells, with increased Notch signaling intensity in lymphopenic environments. In turn, Dll1/Notch2 signaling was required for the transdifferentiation of naïve B cells into innate-like marginal zone B cells in lymphopenic mice.
- 54.Gaudette BT, Roman CJ, Ochoa TA, Atria DG, Jones DD, Siebel CW, Maillard I, Allman D: Resting innate-like B cells leverage sustained Notch2/mTORC1 signaling to achieve rapid and mitosis-independent plasma cell differentiation. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 2021, 131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Chappert P, Huetz F, Espinasse M-A, Chatonnet F, Pannetier L, Da Silva L, Goetz C, Mégret J, Sokal A, Crickx E: Human anti-smallpox long-lived memory B cells are defined by dynamic interactions in the splenic niche and long-lasting germinal center imprinting. Immunity 2022, 55:1872–1890. e1879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Antigen-specific memory B cells isolated from human cadaveric organ donors who had been vaccinated against smallpox decades earlier displayed a Notch-driven transcriptional signature reminiscent of marginal zone B cells. This work suggests a possible role for Notch signaling in the maintenance and function of human long-lived memory B cells.
- 56.Auderset F, Schuster S, Fasnacht N, Coutaz M, Charmoy M, Koch U, Favre S, Wilson A, Trottein F, Alexander J: Notch signaling regulates follicular helper T cell differentiation. The Journal of Immunology 2013, 191:2344–2350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Backer RA, Helbig C, Gentek R, Kent A, Laidlaw BJ, Dominguez CX, De Souza YS, Van Trierum SE, Van Beek R, Rimmelzwaan GF: A central role for Notch in effector CD8+ T cell differentiation. Nature immunology 2014, 15:1143–1151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Mathieu M, Duval F, Daudelin J-F, Labrecque N: The Notch signaling pathway controls short-lived effector CD8+ T cell differentiation but is dispensable for memory generation. The Journal of Immunology 2015, 194:5654–5662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Chung J, Ebens CL, Perkey E, Radojcic V, Koch U, Scarpellino L, Tong A, Allen F, Wood S, Feng J: Fibroblastic niches prime T cell alloimmunity through Delta-like Notch ligands. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 2017, 127:1574–1588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chung J, Radojcic V, Perkey E, Parnell TJ, Niknafs Y, Jin X, Friedman A, Labrecque N, Blazar BR, Brennan TV: Early notch signals induce a pathogenic molecular signature during priming of alloantigen-specific conventional CD4+ T cells in graft-versus-host disease. The Journal of Immunology 2019, 203:557–568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Perkey E, Maurice De Sousa D, Carrington L, Chung J, Dils A, Granadier D, Koch U, Radtke F, Ludewig B, Blazar BR: GCNT1-mediated O-glycosylation of the sialomucin CD43 is a sensitive indicator of notch signaling in activated T cells. The Journal of Immunology 2020, 204:1674–1688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Tkachev V, Vanderbeck A, Perkey E, Furlan SN, McGuckin C, Gómez Atria D, Gerdemann U, Rui X, Lane J, Hunt DJ: Notch signaling drives intestinal graft-versus-host disease in mice and nonhuman primates. Science Translational Medicine 2023, 15:eadd1175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Transient DLL4 Notch ligand blockade protected mice and non-human primates from graft-versus-host disease, the most serious immune complication of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Notch signals were induced by stromal Notch ligands in secondary lymphoid organs such as the spleen and lymph nodes, in turn altering integrin expression in T cells and enhancing their migration to the gut to mediate intestinal graft-versus-host disease.
- 63.Kluk MJ, Ashworth T, Wang H, Knoechel B, Mason EF, Morgan EA, Dorfman D, Pinkus G, Weigert O, Hornick JL: Gauging NOTCH1 activation in cancer using immunohistochemistry. PloS one 2013, 8:e67306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Puente XS, Pinyol M, Quesada V, Conde L, Ordóñez GR, Villamor N, Escaramis G, Jares P, Beà S, González-Díaz M: Whole-genome sequencing identifies recurrent mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Nature 2011, 475:101–105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Shanmugam V, Craig JW, Hilton LK, Nguyen MH, Rushton CK, Fahimdanesh K, Lovitch S, Ferland B, Scott DW, Aster JC: Notch activation is pervasive in SMZL and uncommon in DLBCL: implications for Notch signaling in B-cell tumors. Blood Advances 2021, 5:71–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Activation of Notch signaling may serve as an important driver for splenic marginal zone lymphomas. Even in patients with activating Notch mutations, high levels of active Notch signaling were only seen in niches where stromal Notch ligands are expressed, suggesting that Notch ligands and other niche-specific factors sustain oncogenesis in these tumors.
- 66.Bonfiglio F, Bruscaggin A, Guidetti F, Terzi di Bergamo L, Faderl M, Spina V, Condoluci A, Bonomini L, Forestieri G, Koch R: Genetic and phenotypic attributes of splenic marginal zone lymphoma. Blood 2022, 139:732–747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Gao X, Wang C, Abdelrahman S, Kady N, Murga-Zamalloa C, Gann P, Sverdlov M, Wolfe A, Polk A, Brown N: Notch signaling promotes mature T-cell lymphomagenesis. Cancer research 2022, 82:3763–3773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Notch signaling drives proliferation of T cell lymphomas in a Notch ligand-dependent manner even in the absence of NOTCH pathway genemutations. Together with reference 66, these data suggest the importance of microenvironmental Notch ligands in lymphomagenesis.
