Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2024 Feb 16;14:3906. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49581-5

The influence of climatic and environmental variables on sunflower planting season suitability in Tanzania

John Beteri 1,, James Godfrey Lyimo 2, John Victor Msinde 1
PMCID: PMC10873336  PMID: 38365804

Abstract

Crop survival and growth requires identification of correlations between appropriate suitable planting season and relevant climatic and environmental characteristics. Climatic and environmental conditions may cause water and heat stress at critical stages of crop development and thus affecting planting suitability. Consequently, this may affect crop yield and productivity. This study assesses the influence of climate and environmental variables on rain-fed sunflower planting season suitability in Tanzania. Data on rainfall, temperature, slope, elevation, soil and land use/or cover were accessed from publicly available sources using Google Earth Engine. This is a cloud-based geospatial computing platform for remote sensed datasets. Tanzania sunflower production calendar of 2022 was adopted to mark the start and end limits of planting across the country. The default climate and environmental parameters from FAO database were used. In addition, Pearson correlation was used to evaluate the relationship between rainfall, temperature over Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) from 2000 to 2020 at five-year interval for January-April and June–September, for high and poor suitability season. The results showed that planting suitability of sunflower in Tanzania is driven more by rainfall than temperature. It was revealed that intra-annual planting suitability increases gradually from short to long- rain season and diminishes towards dry season of the year. January-April planting season window showing highest suitability (41.65%), whereas June–September indicating lowest suitability (0.05%). Though, not statistically significant, rainfall and NDVI were positively correlated with r = 0.65 and 0.75 whereas negative correlation existed between temperature and NDVI with r = -− 0.6 and − 0.77. We recommend sunflower subsector interventions that consider appropriate intra-regional and seasonal diversity as an important adaptive mechanism to ensure high sunflower yields.

Subject terms: Climate-change mitigation, Agroecology, Ecology, Climate-change ecology

Introduction

Apart from environmental factors, more specifically soil characteristics, suitability of crop planting seasonality in rain fed crop production scenarios is largely determined by climatic conditions in many parts of the world13. While rain is responsible for water availability to the crops, temperature controls the growing length, phonological development and the productivity of crops4 with radiation ensuring energy supply. If these important climatic aspects are not optimally met, the crops may fail to germinate and establish properly, and hence poor production rate. The ongoing climate change, have severely impacted rain fed crop production dependent areas across different parts of the world57. The main climatic threats that alter crop location specific planting season are those related to decrease in rainfall amount and frequency, and temperature rise. Ultimately, these changes lead to reduction of yields for several annual crops1,6,8. For instance, shifting of precipitation and temperature patterns will cause an increase of unpredictability of growing dates and increase the direct heat and water stress to some grain crop varieties in western and southern hemisphere911. Nevertheless, attenuating these severe impacts of climate change, farmers need to select appropriate suitable sowing/or planting dates, breeding drought tolerant varieties and shifting growing areas so as to ensure high productivity of crops.

In East Africa, climate change impacts have created unpredictability environment in terms of what crop, when and where to be planted. In case of sunflower, farmers in this region are confronted with a risk of dry spells and puts their crops under sensitive heat and water stresses1214. Farm preparation commence prior to onset of seasonal rains whereas planting season window is mainly scheduled following the rain onsets. As a result, sunflower crop face water and heat stress at their critical development stages such as flowering and grain filling12. Moreover, delayed rain onsets in the region leads to shortened growing season window consequently leading to massive crop failures12,15,16. Also, environmental alterations due to climate change cause yields reduction due to increase in crop diseases, pests and emergence of new weeds.

In Tanzania, temperature rise, shifts and unpredictable rainfall patterns expose farmers to uncertainty of planting dates and crop managements14,17. Planting seasonality studies indicated an increase in intra-seasonal and annual temperature trends and variability in several sunflower currently cultivated areas. Future climate projections indicate that temperature will rise by 2.8 °C and 2.5 °C in the sunflower growing areas of western and eastern parts of Tanzania respectively by 2050 due to climate change and variability14,1820. As rain intensity is expected to decline with change in its distribution patterns across many regions of the country, inappropriate methods of timing planting seasons can subject farmers to low production yield. Furthermore, climate change is expected to affect crop growth duration over different environmental characteristics hence affect yields21,22. Assessment of suitability of planting season window based on different climatic and environmental characteristics is imperative to help farmers in Tanzania sow their crops during appropriate planting season windows to utilize the varied climatic seasons across the country to rise sunflower productivity.

Currently, smallholder farmers who are the main sunflower producer in many parts of Tanzania use traditional knowledge and experiences in timing their planting dates17,2325. One of the problem associated with these mechanisms is that they are neither systematically documented nor scientifically investigated. In addition, they can give unreliable information and finally mislead farmers in planning appropriate planting seasons. In some areas dry soil planting has been commonly used albeit with challenges from insects that tend to eat the sown seeds before germination25,26 and washing away of seeds by heavy rains during onset times27. Moreover, climate change continues to make the planning mechanisms of suitable planting dates more unrealistic due to shift in rainfall patterns with increased unpredictability and temperature rise effects. It has so far not been well established how farmers determine the suitable planting season for sunflower production considering variations in climate and associated environmental characteristics in Tanzania. To avoid these challenges posed by traditional mechanisms, farmers need to make use of consistent mechanisms that enable fully and reliable identification of the seasonal distribution of planting season in the country.

The objective of this study is thus to investigate the influence of climatic and environmental variables on suitability of sunflower planting season in Tanzania by using Google Earth Engine (GEE). GEE provides open access, flexible and robust crop climatic and environmental datasets that enables derivation of dynamic maps even at regional or national level. The study hypothesized that suitability of planting season is mainly the function of climate and environmental factors. The hypothesis was tested by using Pearson correlation method. Tanzania Sunflower Production Calendar of 2022 was adopted to mark the actual start and end limits of growing season of sunflower under rain fed scenario.

Materials and methods

Description of the study area

Tanzania is located in East Africa, between 29–41°E and 1–12°S (see Fig. 1). It borders Indian Ocean in the East, Malawi and Zambia in South-West, Rwanda, Burundi and Democratic Republic of Congo in West, Kenya and Uganda in North and Mozambique in the South28. The country is endowed with diverse topography, climate and soil types. According to the recent 2022 census the country has a population of about 61.5 million people29. The country has a total area of 945,087 km2 with 883,749 km2 and being the land area whereas 59,050 km2 is covered by inland water and the Indian Ocean20. Agriculture is the main stay of the country’s economy of which 6% of the land is under sunflower cultivation, with the central zone producing 61% of all sunflower produced14. Tanzania has variation of soil types across geographical locations. Sandy soils are merely predominant in the coastal regions; red soils are commonly found in the central plateau regions with granite soils dominating in the near Lake Victoria regions. Ironstone and volcanic soils are found in western and northern highland regions.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Map of the study area.

Climatically, the country has variable climatic characteristics; for instance coastal regions have an average temperature of 27 to 29 °C whereas the central, western and northern regions have temperature ranging between 20 and 30 °C based on the World Bank Climate Change Knowledge Portal (2021), (https://climateknowledgeportal.worldbank.org/country/tanzania/climate-data-historical). Due to complex nature of topography and landforms, Tanzania experiences unimodal and bimodal rainfalls30. The unimodal means only one rainfall peak per wet season without an alteration of humid and dry month, whereas bimodal is characterised by two wet seasons separated by a dry season. Bimodal rainfalls occur in the northern-eastern highlands, coastal areas and Zanzibar Isles with rainfall ranging from 750 to 1200 mm per annum. March, April and May (MAM) is considered as a long rains while September, October and November (SOND) is a short rains31. The central, southern, western, and south-western highlands receive unimodal rainfalls ranging from 300 to 2000 mm31. The Inter-Tropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) is the main driver of the rainfall distribution pattern in Tanzania1633. Sunflower is grown in almost all the ecological zones of the country, with concentration being in the central zone.

Input datasets

Planting season window, in this study selected environmental and climate datasets which were accessed from different online sources using GEE, a cloud computing application at various sources (see Table 1). The detailed explanation of variables is provided below.

Table 1.

List of environmental and climatic variables that were extracted from GEE.

Dataset Source Product Range Temporal Resolution
Rainfall CHIRPS Chirps monthly 2000- current 3-day 5.5 km
Temperature NASA-MODIS MOD11A2 v006 2000-current 16-day 1 km
NDVI NASA-MODIS MOD13Q1 v006 2000-current 16-day 250 m
Agro-LULC NASA-MODIS MCD12Q1 v051 200–2013 Annual 500 m
MCD12Q1 v006 200–2018 Annual 500 m
ESA Glob Cover2009 2009 Annual 500 m
USGS GFSAD1000 2000 Annual 1 km
Soil properties OpenGeoHub OpenLandMaps 250 m
Elevation NASA/NGA/DLR/DET/ASI SRTM 2000 30 m

Slope data

The slope may prohibit water infiltration into the soil thus affecting crop growth. Sunflower prefers areas with an altitude of 2600 m mean sea level in tropics. It can grow well below 1500 m with slope ranging from 8.3% (FAO, 2000). In this study, slope and elevation data were accessed by using google earth engine from USG Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) released in 2000 at 30 m ground resolution34.

Land use/cover data

Sunflower grows well in steppe, humid and semi-arid areas characterized by natural woodland, thickets, grassland, shrubs, and abundant forests. Hence, land use/cover is a key input in the study. Data for this variable was extracted from Globe Cover ESA/GLOBECOVER at 300 m, Moderate Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) Land Cover Type 500 m, V051 (ii) and V006 (iii) and Global Food-Support Analysis Data for cropland extent at 1 km35. With the use of GEE application waterbodies within the study area were masked out, hence not considered in the analysis since these were considered as irrelevant and unsuitable areas.

Climate data

Change in temperature and rainfall patterns can affect crop growing season and its pattern too. The variability of rainfall and average temperature can lead to changes in growing season duration and increased crop and prematurity3639. Low rainfall results to poor crop development38,40. Sunflower flourishes in low and moderate humid, tropical wet and dry, semi-arid or steppe, subtropical humid, subtropical dry summer, subtropical dry winter, temperate with dry winters and temperate climate with optimal temperature between 17 °C and 34 °C. It requires rainfall amount around 300 and 1600 mm (FAO, 2000). Daily (minimum & maximum) rainfall data were accessed from the Climate Hazard Group Infrared Precipitation with Station, (CHIRPS) at 5.5 km resolution41. Similarly, Google Earth Engine was also used to obtain data on minimum and maximum temperature (°C) at 8 days temporal resolution from MODIS Terra Land Surface Temperature product42.

Soil data

Sunflower thrives in sand, silt and clay loam soils, with pH of 6 to 7.5. In addition, the crop grows well in areas with well-drained soil with dry spells, medium and light textures, low salinity of < 4 dS/m, bulk density of 1.4 g/cm3, 16% soil water content and 13.3C/kg organic matter and 50–150 cm soil depth (FAO, 2000). The soil characteristics of relevance to this study included soil pH, organic carbon (c/kg), bulk density (g/cm3), soil water content, taxonomy groups (kPa) and soil texture (sand/silt/clay). Data on these parameters was obtained from the OpenGeoHub LandGIS43,44. This uses an automated technique by enabling farmers and researchers to collect and measure soil properties from field samples for regular improvement and is often updated in GEE. It is available at 250 m spatial resolution (Table 1).

Normalized different vegetation index data

Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) was initially developed in 1973 by a research team at Texas A&M University. It is the spatial technique used in crop managements to evaluate biomass content of plants and /or crops on time-series manner. In this study, vegetation indices data was obtained from NASA MODIS45 and used to quantify crop production in the study area based on planting suitability windows.

Tanzania sunflower production calendar

Sunflower is the annual crop whose growth cycle ranges between 90 and 160 days (FAO, 2000). Therefore, cropping calendar is important as it allows farmers to plan from land preparation to cropping and harvesting stages. Tanzania sunflower production calendar of 202246 was adopted to set the start and end limits of the planting dates over various inter regional and/ or regional climatic conditions.

Methods

The Google Earth Engine (GEE) was introduced by Google in 2010 at the International Climate Change Conference in Cancún, Mexico47. GEE is an open access web-based platform that allows access, computation and/or processing of large scale-satellite images from many computer-servers in Google’s data centers48. In this study, the suitability of sunflower planting season windows in Tanzania was carried out under six procedures using scripts modified from Ref.49. First, Tanzania was set into the application as the study area boundary. Second, the platform was set to acquire publicly accessible and high spatio-temporal resolution global climatic and environmental datasets; such as UCSB Climate Hazards Group precipitation41, NASA MODIS land-cover type (MCD12Q1)35,50, NASA MODIS temperature (MOD11A2)42, NASA/USGS cropland extent (GFSAD)35, ESA land-cover type (GlobCover)51, NASA MODIS LST(MOD13Q1)45, OpenGeoHub/LandGIS soil properties43, it include soil properties such as organic carbon content, bulk density, pH, soil water content, sand/silt/clay fraction and biome/taxonomy groupings and NASA/NGA/DLR/DET/ASI elevation (SRTM)34 as explained in details in the input data section and shown in Table 1.

Third, masking the area under agriculture and cropland; MODIS/006 (MCD12Q1)35,50 and UMD/hansen /global forest (2015) were used as input datasets for creating layers for masking out waterbodies in the study area since the study considered them as permanent non suitable areas. Meanwhile, NASA/USGS/GFSAD1000_V135 and ESA/GlobCover51 were used to delineate agriculture and cropland extent.

Fourth, 2000–2001 and 2001–2002 were defined as the temporal aggregation ranges (years) followed by crop growth season duration in month/days (MM-dd) which was established to meet the seasonal duration of sunflower crop under rain fed scenario. In Tanzania, rain takes place during September, October and November (SON) as short rains, and from March, April to May (MAM) as long rains, respectively. This shows wrapping/or an overlap of sunflower growing seasons over the next year. Therefore, if data are aggregated based on single year it is possible that the results could be product of two distinctive growth seasons. To address this, we specifically adopted the Tanzania sunflower production calendar of 202246 to customize the start and end of sunflower planting season in Tanzania based on geographical patterns of climatic and environmental characteristics. Planting season were made to wrap over the next year, in order to connect from one year to the following year. Therefore, a set of 4-month moving planting season windows for 12 months from two different sequential time ranges were used namely; from 2000 to 2001 for October-January, November-February, and December-March, whereas 2001–2002 was used for January-April, February-May, March-June, April-July, May–August, June–September, July–October, August-November, September-December.

Fifth, defining sunflower crop requirements or thresholds; each crop requires specific climatic and environmental characteristics to thrive. In this study, FAO ECOCROP database (1991), available from https://gaez.fao.org/pages/ecocrop-find-plant was used to customize sunflower growth season requirements in terms of rainfall, temperature and other environmental ranges. The ecological crop parameters in the ECOCROP be used to customize thresholds of possible suitable crop growth season of any crop52 with albeit differences observed among crop species53.

Lastly, after all the input datasets met ten raster layers in three types were loaded in the GEE application interface. The first layers displayed include mean seasonal temperature and rainfall, mean seasonal NDVI. The second layers consisted of temperature, rainfall, and combined suitability boolean map layers. The third map layer include the combined crop suitability of planting season characterized into suitable or not suitable classes based on temperature and rainfall input. The final combined crop suitability displays two values, 1 and 0. 1 represents area with suitable planting season whereas the value of 0 represents non-suitable planting season. The maps and figures were plotted in R studio software.

Temporal planting season suitability ranking

The study also evaluated temporal comparison between sunflower suitability and non-suitability windows in the entire year. This was important so as to understand the ranks and direction of sunflower production season in the country. Thus, percentage of each planting season window was computed by taking the total number of suitable pixels in square meters over total area of the country multiplied by 1,000,000. The rationale was to convert square meters into square kilometers.

Hence, the following equation.

e=abd1000000 1

where, a=sizeofonepixelinsquaremeter, b=totalnumberofpixelsofsuitable/nonsuitableplantingseasoninsquaremeter, c=totalsizeofsuitablelandinsquaremeter, thusc=ab, d=totalsizeofTanzanialandinsquaremeter, e=fractionof suitablelandinsquaremeter.

After obtaining the total size of suitable and non-suitable land for each planting season at countrywide level, the next step was to indicate the simultaneously highest planting suitability and non-suitability in a year in order to highlight their ranks. In this case, both variables were converted to the same scale. The values for suitable and non-suitable land were normalized between 0 and 1 value using the equation: zi=Xi-Min(x)/(Maxx-Minx.where zi=theithnormalizedvalueinthedataset, xi=the\, ith \,value\, in \,the\, dataset,Min(x=theminimumvalueinthedataset, Max=themaximumvalueinthedataset. Then after, the ranks were presented through mirrored histograms and radial graphs R studio in ggplot2 package58.

Pearson correlation method

The relationship between the average values of NDVI and climate factors from 2000 to 2020, was evaluated by using Pearson correlation approach. The interval of five years over two planting windows was adopted. The selected planting suitability windows were; January-April, representing good planting window and June–September represented low planting suitability, respectively. The NDVI, rainfall and temperature values for each variable were retrieved by GEE and converted into excel data sheet. These variables were selected because they can affect positively and/ or negatively crop sowing dates, planting acreages and ultimately lower the crop yields37,38,59. Pearson’s correlation method in R studio was carried out so as to know their correlational strengths. This statistical analysis is recommended in analyzing statistical variables (data) which have time intervals with suspected linear relationship between variables and has been adopted elsewhere e.g. Ref.60. The r values were used to judge the strength of relationship with r given a value of 1 or − 1. The value 1 indicates strong positive association between the two variables and -1 indicates strong negative association whereas 0 denotes no relationship between the variables. The strengths of correlation were categorized based on Ref.61 that 0.00–0.19 (very weak), 0.20–0.39 (weak); 0.40–0.59 (moderate); 0.60–0.79 (strong); and 0.80–1.0 (very strong). The following equation was used to compute this association.

r=n(xy)-(x)(y)[nx2-(x)2][ny2-(y2) 2

where, r= Pearson coefficient; n= number of the pairs of the variables; xy= sum of the products of the paired variables; Σx= sum of the x scores; y= sum of the y scores; x2= sum of the squared x scores; and y2= sum of the squared y scores.

Results and discussion

GEE assessment results

The results from GEE analysis yielded a twelve 4-months moving windows of sunflower planting season in Tanzania (see Fig. 2). Results shows that suitability of planting season windows are influenced more by rainy season distribution patterns in Tanzania. The spatial pattern of planting season windows in October-January, November-February and December-March corresponded to short rainy seasons that span from October, November to December (OND) with average suitable area of 39.58%, 40.41%, 40.97% and 39.58%, respectively. Most suitable areas in this period are mainly distributed in the central corridor, southern highlands, coastal regions, areas around Lake Victoria and some parts of Zanzibar Islands. Earlier planting date studies in selected sub-Sahara African regions (Tanzania, Malawi, Uganda, Ethiopia, Zambia and Zimbabwe), pointed out that planting season is determined by rainfall distribution within the season and year-to-year variability in rainy onsets would imply shifting of planting dates6266.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Sunflower planting seasonality patterns in Tanzania on a multiple temporal dates; Simulated time ranges; 2000–20001 and 2001–2002. Note; the white patches denote water bodies.

On the other hand, during the long rains season planting suitability tends to expand more geographically with January-April recording the highest spatial coverage score (42.04%) out of all planting season windows produced. The highest score of the planting window in January-April is due to the fact that during this particular time long rains tend to be more established thus ensuring broader production area and higher yields. Stable and optimal rainfall can ensure wider suitable production area and higher sunflower yield in the study area followed by February-May, March-June and April-July with 35.26%, 26.28% and 9.25% (see Fig. 2). However, least planting suitability was revealed from May–August, June–September and July–October with 0.72%, 0.05% and 0.001%, respectively (see Figs. 2 and 6). Therefore, the suitability of sunflower planting windows decreases as one moves towards the dry season of the year when water shortage becomes critical and cannot allow seeds germination especially in the main sunflower growing areas. Based on these findings one can learn that generally is usually safe for sunflower farmers to plant crops after the rain has established to ensure maximum yields17,24.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Radial bar plot showing a systematic suitable planting window of sunflower (green).

The new season of planting based on these results connect to next year from August-November and September-December (Figs. 2 and 3). Results in this study corroborate with previous related studies where variations of rainfall seasonality and temperatures have been shown to affect spatial pattern of the suitability of growing seasons for many annual crops and ultimately impacting their yields15,65,67. From agronomical perspective this particular finding may help policy makers and agricultural extension workers in Tanzania to determine crop and locational based appropriate planting dates that will enable farmers to grow their crops and maximize yields. It should however be noted that other households’ and farm-specific variables related to, socio-economic and agronomic factors such as, seed availability, planting technology, farm management practices can as well affect timing of planting season suitability windows.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Rainfall distribution patterns over the 4-month planting seasons in Tanzania. Note; the white patches denote water bodies.

Rainfall suitability distribution patterns

Rainfall distribution patterns were analyzed for each season window. The results indicate that rainfall suitability patterns corresponded spatially to planting season windows both during the short and long term rain seasons (Figs. 2 and 3). Higher rainfall suitability in October-January, November-February and December-March indicated in (Fig. 3) spatially correspond with planting suitability which is mainly distributed in areas around Lake Victoria, central, southern highlands, coastal regions and Zanzibar Isles. The planting suitability distribution is more related to the start of short rain seasons in these areas. It was indicated that January-April and February-May had highest rainfall suitability occupying areas around Lake Victoria, central, east-southern highlands regions, central, coastal areas, parts of Zanzibar Isles. From February-May to May–August season windows rain tends to decline (see Figs. 2 and 3). The least rainfall suitability begin from May–August, June–September, July–October to August-November. These results may help farmers to critically identify seasons that are quite vulnerable to dry spells and therefore be in position to adopt sustainable adaptive strategies in their specific regions. Closely related studies conducted elsewhere in Africa that associated geographical planting season with rainfalls reported similar findings3,67,68.

Temperature suitability distribution patterns

It was found that, temperature suitability tends to meet sunflower planting requirements or preferences for all windows in many areas in Tanzania especially in the central, areas around Lake Victoria, east-southern highlands, coastal regions and the Zanzibar Isles (Fig. 4). This doesn’t overrule the reality that these places have variations in their own daily temperature ranges depending on the prevalent seasonal weather and climatic condition.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Temperature distribution patterns over the 4-month-planting season window in Tanzania. Note; the white patches denote water bodies.

Generally, temperature suitability pattern for each planting window seemed to have high geographical coverage regardless of the prevailing rainy season present. This was different as compared to rainfall suitability whose spatial patterns only depended on rainy season of the respective area. The same observations were made in the study by69 in Northern China where temperature was found to meet the potato panting and growth requirements almost for all seasons for five decades. This is in line with the studies conducted on global scale by1,3 that planting suitability for many crops especially under rain-fed scenarios is estimated from climatic condition in different part of the world, so Tanzania cannot is inclusive.

Planting season suitability and non-suitability order

The study also evaluated the temporal gradual change of planting suitability depending on the rainy seasonality across all 12 planting windows simulated. The mirrored bar shown in (Fig. 5), depicts the inverse or comparison between suitable and non-suitable planting window at the same season with each variable having different units. The radial bar in (Fig. 6), highlights that January-April, December-March, November-February, October-January, February-May and March-June, respectively are markedly with highest planting suitable season windows in Tanzania. This coincides with stable rainfall in many parts of the country including central, areas around Lake Victoria, east-southern highlands, coastal regions and the Zanzibar Isles (Fig. 3). Meanwhile, September-December, April-July and June–September represent low production season in a year. Non-suitable planting windows shown in (Fig. 6) match with dry condition occupying almost the entire country during at this period (Fig. 3). Generally, farmers in Tanzania may detect an appropriate planting season based on their local climatic and environmental backgrounds under rain fed production (Figs. 3, 5 and 6). The practical relevance of this finding is that, farmers may have high degree of precision to ensure survival of their crops since recommended crops’ reproductive/growth phases will correspond with existing suitable climate and environmental factors.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Mirrored bar plot showing seasonal variations in suitable (green) and non-suitable planting season (black). AN August-November, APJ April-July, DM December-March, FM February–May, JAP January-April, JO July–October, JS June–September, MA May–August, MAJ March-June, NF November-February, OJ October-January and SD September-December.

Statistical relationship between climate factors and sunflower NDVI

The Pearson correlation was carried out to analyze relationship between climatic variables (rainfall and temperature) versus NDVI per each planting suitability using R studio software. The r-coefficient and p-value were used to measure the level of statistical relationship and significance. The correlation results are presented in (Fig. 7a–d).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

(ad) Scatter plot showing correlation between average seasonal sunflower NDVI with temperature and rainfall 2000–2020.

Rainfall and NDVI

Findings showed a positive correlation although not statistically significant between sunflower NDVI and rainfall during both seasons January-April and June–September (Fig. 7a,b). The NDVI responded positively to rainfall increase in long and short rainy seasons which indicates positive effects of rainfall with the planting season given the variations. In (Fig. 7a,b), the correlation of NDV and rainfall showed 65% and 75%, respectively implying that the two variables are related to one another during optimal planting seasons. In addition, higher rainfall records was observed during January-April, whereas low rainfall were observed during June–September planting window (see Table 2 and Fig. 7a,b). Variation in rainfall amounts in these two temporal windows was because the higher rainfall occurs during the long term and stable rainy season while the later denotes critical dry season in the year. Using the different modelling approaches in different countries such as Uganda12, Sahiwal region in Pakistan5457, in Yamzhog Yumco Basin in South Tibet70, Tanzania49 and Mongolia China68 reported similar findings where high NDVI values was found to correlate with rainy season.

Table 2.

List of seasonal average rainfall, temperature and NDVI used in this analysis.

January-April June–September
Year Rainfall (mm) Temp (°C) NDVI R (mm) Temp (°C) NDVI
2000-1-4 291 23 0.641 27.013 25.05 0.381
2005-1-4 486.788 23.918 0.636 24.905 24.028 0.416
2010-1-4 567.659 23.788 0.635 25.889 24.181 0.422
2015-1-4 542.209 24.277 0.583 30.412 24.76 0.424
2020-1-4 889.444 22.92 0.66 33.763 23.853 0.475

Temperature versus NDVI

Negative correlation between NDVI and temperature was observed during January-April and June–September seasons with − 75% and − 77%, respectively (see Fig. 7c and d). Rise in temperature values denote a direct negative response of NDVI in both seasons. This suggests that temperature would not promote suitability in planting season. Unlike rainfall, low temperature values were observed during January-April, whereas higher values were noted during June–September planting season window (see Table 2 and Fig. 7c,d). Variation in records in these two temporal windows was caused by reduced land surface temperature during long term rainy season. On other hand, high temperature records might have been caused by an increase of soil evaporative effects due to higher surface temperature during dry season.

Conclusion

This paper examined the influence of climatic and environmental variables on suitability of planting season of sunflower in Tanzania. Twelve 4-months moving planting windows were produced for 2000–2001 and 2001–2002. As expected the average suitability of planting season windows in the sunflower growing areas in Tanzania varies depending on climatic parameters especially rainfall seasonal distribution patterns. The planting windows decreases as one moves towards dry season of the year when water shortage becomes critical as result, early planting season windows indicated higher rate of suitability in the study area thus it can be a sign of ensuring higher sunflower crop productivity or yields. Different from rainfall, temperature was found to be optimal over a wider geographical range in Tanzania regardless of the planting season window. Therefore, it is worth noting that temperature rise would mean negative effects to planting season suitability. There was positive and negative relation though not significant between selected climatic variables and NDVI in both high and low or non-suitable planting season windows across twenty years in the study area. Positive response of NDVI to rainfall on long and short rainy seasons indicated good suitability of planting season given the variations. Therefore climatic factors especially rainfall are key determinants in rain-fed agriculture. Future research in this area should explore other specific factors that determine sunflower planting season and growing suitability such as seeds availability, farm size, planting technology, farm management practices and households’ socio-economic characteristics which have not been part of this investigation.

The GEE application platform as applied in this analysis is robust platform that can be used to generate appropriate planting date windows that could help smallholder famers whose reliance on local knowledge and experiences are unreliable and often misleading in this context of climate change and variability. In addition, this could provide farmers with site-specific planting season depending on their variable climates and environments. Hence, we recommend sunflower subsector actors, famers and policy makers to advocate for identification of appropriate season/dates suitable for planting.

Acknowledgements

The corresponding author would like to thank the Almighty God for His mercies, graces and good health to me, my family and my mother during preparation of this work. The authors would like to thank the funding of the corresponding author to study PhD programme at Institute of Resources Assessment (IRA), University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. The authors would also like to thank the Harvard Dataverse website for their online free accessible and editable Google Earth Engine scripts for crop suitability modeling which made this work realized. The authors acknowledge all online sources of remotely sensed datasets that were used in this study.

Author contributions

J.B. comprehended of the approach, wrote the code to create the suitability index and all the corresponding figures and drafted the initial manuscript text. J.V.M. and J.G.L. read the findings and gave more interpretation of the manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the University of Dar es Salaam.

Data availability

The datasets resulted to these findings of this study are available to the corresponding author of this work upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Waha K, Van Bussel LGJ, Müller C, Bondeau A. Climate-driven simulation of global crop sowing dates. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2012;21:247–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00678.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Okonya JS, Kroschel J. Farmers’ knowledge and perceptions of potato pests and their management in Uganda. J. Agric. Rural Dev. Trop. Subtrop. 2016;117:87–97. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sacks WJ, Deryng D, Foley JA, Ramankutty N. Crop planting dates: An analysis of global patterns. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2010;19:607–620. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00551.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Porter JR, Semenov MA. Crop responses to climatic variation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2005;360:2021–2035. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bassu S, et al. How do various maize crop models vary in their responses to climate change factors? Glob. Change Biol. 2014;20:2301–2320. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Asseng S, et al. Rising temperatures reduce global wheat production. Nat. Clim. Change. 2015;5:143–147. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2470. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Flohr BM, et al. Redefining the link between rainfall and crop establishment in dryland cropping systems. Agric. Syst. 2021;190:103105. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103105. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhao C, et al. Temperature increase reduces global yields of major crops in four independent estimates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2017;114:9326–9331. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1701762114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Debaeke, P., Casadebaig, P., Flenet, F. & Langlade, N. Sunflower crop and climate change in Europe: Vulnerability, adaptation, and mitigation potential. ISC 2016 100 (2016).
  • 10.Debaeke P, Casadebaig P, Flenet F, Langlade N. Sunflower crop and climate change: Vulnerability, adaptation, and mitigation potential from case-studies in Europe. OCL Oilseeds Fats Crops Lipids. 2017;24:15. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mehrabi Z, Pironon S, Kantar M, Ramankutty N, Rieseberg L. Shifts in the abiotic and biotic environment of cultivated sunflower under future climate change. OCL. 2019;26:9. doi: 10.1051/ocl/2019003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ocen E, De Bie CAJM, Onyutha C. Investigating false start of the main growing season: A case of Uganda in East Africa. Heliyon. 2021;7:e08428. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kihupi NI, Tarimo AK, Masika RJ, Boman B, Dick WA. Trend of growing season characteristics of semi-arid Arusha District in Tanzania. Int. J. Biol. 2015;7:45. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Groot, A. et al. Sunflower Tanzania: Climate change risks and opportunities. (2019).
  • 15.Fisher M, et al. Drought tolerant maize for farmer adaptation to drought in sub-Saharan Africa: Determinants of adoption in eastern and southern Africa. Clim. Change. 2015;133:283–299. doi: 10.1007/s10584-015-1459-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ojara MA, et al. Projected changes in East African climate and its impacts on climatic suitability of maize production areas by the mid-twenty-first century. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2021;193:831. doi: 10.1007/s10661-021-09547-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nyagumbo I, Mkuhlani S, Mupangwa W, Rodriguez D. Planting date and yield benefits from conservation agriculture practices across Southern Africa. Agric. Syst. 2017;150:21–33. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.09.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mourice SK, Rweyemamu CL, Tumbo SD, Amuri N. Maize cultivar specific parameters for decision support system for agrotechnology transfer (DSSAT) application in Tanzania. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2014;05:821–833. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2014.56096. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mtongori HI, et al. Impacts of climate and farming management on maize yield in southern Tanzania. Afr. Crop Sci. J. 2015;23:399–417. doi: 10.4314/acsj.v23i4.9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Luhunga PM, et al. Climate change projections for Tanzania based on high-resolution regional climate models from the coordinated regional climate downscaling experiment (CORDEX)-Africa. Front. Environ. Sci. 2018 doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2018.00122. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gurkan H, et al. Estimating the potential impact of climate change on sunflower yield in the Konya province of Turkey. J. Agric. Sci. 2020;158:806–818. doi: 10.1017/S0021859621000101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Asfaw A, Simane B, Hassen A, Bantider A. Variability and time series trend analysis of rainfall and temperature in northcentral Ethiopia: A case study in Woleka sub-basin. Weather Clim. Extrem. 2018;19:29–41. doi: 10.1016/j.wace.2017.12.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chang’a, L. B., Yanda, P. Z. & Ngana, J. Indigenous knowledge in seasonal rainfall prediction in Tanzania: A case of the South-western Highland of Tanzania.
  • 24.Baijukya, F. et al. Maize production manual for smallholder farmers in Tanzania.
  • 25.Gamba, A. M., Kimaro, A. A. & Mtei, K. M. Effects of Climate Smart Agricultural practices and Planting Dates on Maize Growth and Nutrient Uptake in Semi-Arid Tanzania. (2020).
  • 26.Lana MA, et al. Is dry soil planting an adaptation strategy for maize cultivation in semi-arid Tanzania? Food Secur. 2018;10:897–910. doi: 10.1007/s12571-017-0742-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Reason CJC, Hachigonta S, Phaladi RF. Interannual variability in rainy season characteristics over the Limpopo region of southern Africa. Int. J. Climatol. 2005;25:1835–1853. doi: 10.1002/joc.1228. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Luhunga PM. Projection of extreme climatic events related to frequency over different regions of Tanzania. J. Water Clim. Change. 2022;13:1297–1312. doi: 10.2166/wcc.2022.357. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.NBS. The United Republic of Tanzania Administrative Units Population Distribution Report. (2022).
  • 30.World Bank Climate Change Knowledge Portal. https://climateknowledgeportal.worldbank.org/.
  • 31.Luhunga P, Botai J, Kahimba F. Evaluation of the performance of CORDEX regional climate models in simulating present climate conditions of Tanzania. J. South. Hemisphere Earth Syst. Sci. 2016;66:32–54. doi: 10.1071/ES16005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hills RC. The structure of the inter-tropical convergence zone in Equatorial Africa and its relationship to East African rainfall. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 1979;4:329–352. doi: 10.2307/622055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Borhara K, Pokharel B, Bean B, Deng L, Wang S-YS. On Tanzania’s precipitation climatology, variability, and future projection. Climate. 2020;8:34. doi: 10.3390/cli8020034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Farr TG, et al. The shuttle radar topography mission. Rev. Geophys. 2007 doi: 10.1029/2005RG000183. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Friedl, Mark & Sulla-Menashe, Damien. MCD12Q1 MODIS/Terra+Aqua Land Cover Type Yearly L3 Global 500m SIN Grid V006. 10.5067/MODIS/MCD12Q1.006 (2019).
  • 36.Harsányi E, et al. Impact of agricultural drought on sunflower production across Hungary. Atmosphere. 2021;12:1339. doi: 10.3390/atmos12101339. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Medori M, Michelini L, Nogues I, Loreto F, Calfapietra C. Research article the impact of root temperature on photosynthesis and isoprene emission in three different plant species. Sci. World J. 2012 doi: 10.1100/2012/525827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Olesen JE, Bindi M. Consequences of climate change for European agricultural productivity, land use and policy. Eur. J. Agron. 2002;16:239–262. doi: 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00004-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wheeler TR, Craufurd PQ, Ellis RH, Porter JR, Prasad PV. Temperature variability and the yield of annual crops. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2000;82:159–167. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00224-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cantelaube P, Terres J-M. Seasonal weather forecasts for crop yield modelling in Europe. Tellus Dyn. Meteorol. Oceanogr. 2005;57:476–487. doi: 10.3402/tellusa.v57i3.14669. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Funk C, et al. The climate hazards infrared precipitation with stations—A new environmental record for monitoring extremes. Sci. Data. 2015;2:150066. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2015.66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wan, Zhengming, Hook, Simon & Hulley, Glynn. MOD11A2 MODIS/Terra Land Surface Temperature/Emissivity 8-Day L3 Global 1km SIN Grid V006. 10.5067/MODIS/MOD11A2.006 (2015).
  • 43.Hengl T, MacMillan RA. Predictive Soil Mapping with R. Lulu.com; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Herrick JE, et al. The global Land-Potential Knowledge System (LandPKS): Supporting evidence-based, site-specific land use and management through cloud computing, mobile applications, and crowdsourcing. J. Soil Water Conserv. 2013;68:5A–12A. doi: 10.2489/jswc.68.1.5A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Didan, Kamel. MOD13Q1 MODIS/Terra Vegetation Indices 16-Day L3 Global 250m SIN Grid V006. 10.5067/MODIS/MOD13Q1.006 (2015).
  • 46.MoA. Tanzania sunflower production calendar. (2022).
  • 47.Moore, R. Introducing Google Earth Engine. Retrieved Monday 13th Dec. (2010).
  • 48.Moore, R. T. & Hansen, M. C. Google Earth Engine: A new cloud-computing platform for global-scale earth observation data and analysis. 2011, IN43C-02 (2011).
  • 49.Peter BG, Messina JP, Lin Z, Snapp SS. Crop climate suitability mapping on the cloud: A geovisualization application for sustainable agriculture. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:15487. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72384-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Teluguntla, P. et al. Global Cropland Area Database (GCAD) derived from Remote Sensing in Support of Food Security in the Twenty-first Century: Current Achievements and Future Possibilities.
  • 51.Arino, O. GlobCover 2009. (2010).
  • 52.Ezekannagha, E. Assessing the climatic suitability of Bambara groundnut as an underutilised crop to future climate projections in Sikasso and Ségou, Mali. (2020).
  • 53.Ramirez-Villegas J, Jarvis A, Läderach P. Empirical approaches for assessing impacts of climate change on agriculture: The EcoCrop model and a case study with grain sorghum. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2013;170:67–78. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.09.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Peter BG, Messina JP, Lin Z, Snapp SS. Crop climate suitability mapping on the cloud: A geovisualization application for sustainable agriculture. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:1–17. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72384-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hussain S, et al. Relation of land surface temperature with different vegetation indices using multi-temporal remote sensing data in Sahiwal region, Pakistan. Geosci. Lett. 2023;10:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s40562-023-00287-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zhe M, Zhang X. Time-lag effects of NDVI responses to climate change in the Yamzhog Yumco Basin. South Tibet. Ecol. Indic. 2021;124:107431. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107431. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wickham H. Programming with ggplot2. In: Wickham H, editor. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer International Publishing; 2016. pp. 241–253. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Cong RG, Brady M. The interdependence between rainfall and temperature: Copula analyses. Sci. World J. 2012;2012:1–11. doi: 10.1100/2012/405675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth. Analg. 2018;126:1763–1768. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Evan AT, Heidinger AK, Knippertz P. Analysis of winter dust activity off the coast of West Africa using a new 24-year over-water advanced very high resolution radiometer satellite dust climatology. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2006 doi: 10.1029/2005JD006336. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sofoluwe N, Tijani A, Baruwa O. Farmers’ perception and adaptation to climate change in Osun State, Nigeria. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2011;6:4789–4794. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Bele: Local communities vulnerability to climate... - Google Scholar.
  • 63.Fosu-Mensah BY, Vlek PLG, MacCarthy DS. Farmers’ perception and adaptation to climate change: A case study of Sekyedumase district in Ghana. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2012;14:495–505. doi: 10.1007/s10668-012-9339-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bryan E, et al. Adapting agriculture to climate change in Kenya: Household strategies and determinants. J. Environ. Manag. 2013;114:26–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Okonya JS, Kroschel J. Indigenous knowledge of seasonal weather forecasting: A case study in six regions of Uganda. Agric. Sci. 2013 doi: 10.4236/as.2013.412086. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wang C, et al. Interdecadal variation of potato climate suitability in China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2021;310:107293. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2020.107293. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Chuai XW, Huang XJ, Wang WJ, Bao G. NDVI, temperature and precipitation changes and their relationships with different vegetation types during 1998–2007 in Inner Mongolia, China. Int. J. Climatol. 2013;33:1696–1706. doi: 10.1002/joc.3543. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Zhao J, Zhan X, Jiang Y, Xu J. Variations in climatic suitability and planting regionalization for potato in northern China under climate change. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0203538. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gu Z, Duan X, Shi Y, Li Y, Pan X. Spatiotemporal variation in vegetation coverage and its response to climatic factors in the Red River Basin. China. Ecol. Indic. 2018;93:54–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wen Y, Liu X, Yang J, Lin K, Du G. NDVI indicated inter-seasonal non-uniform time-lag responses of terrestrial vegetation growth to daily maximum and minimum temperature. Glob. Planet. Change. 2019;177:27–38. doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2019.03.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets resulted to these findings of this study are available to the corresponding author of this work upon reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES