Abstract
The microorganisms in the human body gradually change and maintain a dynamic balance with the development of physiology and pathology. Oral microbiota is one of the most important microbiota in human body. It is not only closely related to the occurrence and development of oral diseases, but also plays an important role in the overall health. In childhood, the population of oral microorganisms is relatively small, but with the growth of age and tooth development, the species and quantity of oral microorganisms are gradually increasing. Different oral diseases also have their corresponding main microorganisms, and these dominant microorganisms change at different stages of the disease. In this review, we summarized and compared the main pathogenic microorganisms of several common oral diseases in children and adults. In addition, the possible association and difference between adults and children of the main pathogenic microorganisms in different stages of the same or different diseases are also discussed in order to provide research data for the development and diagnosis of common oral diseases in children and adults.
Keywords: adults and children, common oral diseases, oral microbiota
1. INTRODUCTION
Since the birth of each newborn, bacterial communities begin to colonize the human body. 1 , 2 A large number of previous studies have shown that the colonization of neonatal oral flora comes from the vertical transmission of their mothers, horizontal transmission between individuals, transmission in the process of diet and feeding, and contact with the environment. 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 However, the microbiota in the human body is not immutable and frozen; with the change of dentition and reconstruction of oral function, as one of the most diverse environments in our body, the number, type, and even dominant bacteria of oral flora will change accordingly. 1 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 At the beginning, in edentulous stage, the main location of oral flora is at the surface of oral mucosa and 3 the main bacteria are gram‐positive facultative bacteria, followed by gram‐negative anaerobic bacteria. 6 , 9 Streptococcus salivarius is the most commonly isolated bacteria in the oral mucosa of newborn infants because it has better adhesion with buccal mucosa and tongue 1 ; it keeps a relatively stable growth in the first 3 months of the newborn but begins to decrease after 3 months, which is believed to be related to the eruption of the first deciduous tooth in the mouth of children. 1 , 10 At the same time, Streptococcus mutans begin to accelerate its colonization, and it is due to the greater adhesion of S. mutans to the tooth surface compared with other bacteria in the mouth. 8 The proportion of S. mutans, Pasteurellaceae, and Enterobacteriaceae in primary dentition stage is higher than that in other dentition stages. 8 After the eruption of the last deciduous tooth, the operational taxonomic units of bacteria that can be detected in the mouth have reached 550. 4 The proportion of Pasteurellaceae and Carnobacteriaceae in mixed dentition stage is higher. 8 In the period of permanent dentition, there are 10,000 microbial system types in dental plaque alone, which is far more than the more than 700 oral microbial system types detected by traditional methods. 11
Mostly, it is worth noting that fungi and viruses are also present in the oral cavity of a newborn baby after birth, and these fungi and viruses may also be occasional causative factors in certain contexts, such as congenital immunodeficiency. Candida is the most frequently detected fungus; other fungi such as Cladosporium, Aureobasidium, Saccharomycetales, Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Cryptococcus also exist at the same time. 12 , 13 , 14 At present, there is not enough research on the viruses colonized in the mouth of newborns under physiological conditions, mainly focusing on the viruses under pathological conditions, including HIV, herpes simplex virus (including HSV‐1 and HSV‐2), and coxsackie virus. 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20
Therefore, the oral microbiota changes with time and maintains a dynamic balance. The oral microbiota in different periods is different, which also conforms to the view of ecological succession. 6 , 21 Understanding the differences and changes of oral microbiota has long been considered as a very important aspect for disease prediction and diagnosis. However, nowadays, research on the main microorganisms of common oral diseases in children and adults mainly focuses on the comparison of oral flora between parents and children with the same disease or the influence of one party's illness on the other party's oral flora or other physical conditions. This article believes that by comparing the main microorganisms of common oral diseases in children and adults, new discoveries may be made about the understanding of the same disease in different age groups, and it is also of profound significance to prevent common oral diseases in children and adults.
2. COMPARISON OF THE MAIN MICROBIOTA BETWEEN CHILDREN AND ADULTS IN COMMON ORAL DISEASES
2.1. Caries
Caries is considered to be a common oral disease for children and adults, and it can be regarded as one of the most popular diseases in the world. 22 , 23 , 24 This is a common dental hard tissue defect disease caused by bacteria, food, host, and time. 25 Previous cross‐sectional studies have shown that there are core biogroups in caries‐related bacteria, and higher caries prevalence is related to lower bacterial diversity. With the severity of caries, microbial diversity gradually decreases. 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 According to the detection of oral flora of adults with dental caries, the core flora of adult plaque microbiota includes S. salivarius, Veronicus, Leptotrichia, Streptococcus parasanguinis, Capnocytophaga, Prevotella, Actinomyces, Corynebacterium, Neisseria, Rothia, and Megasphaera. 27 , 29 In addition, some uncommon bacteria were also detected with increased abundance, including Atopobium, Cryptobacterium, Lactobacillus, Mogibacterium, Ochrobactrum, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, Alloprevotella, Bacteroides, Centipeda, Campylobacter, Megasphaera, Mycoplasma, Gammaproteobacteria, Cardiobacterium, and Pasteurellaceae (Table 1), and they are considered as potential cariogenic bacteria. 27 , 30 , 31
TABLE 1.
The main pathogenic microorganisms of dental caries in adults and children.
| Disease | Early childhood caries | Caries in children | Caries in adult | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main microorganisms |
|
|
|
|
|
Surprisingly, S. mutans do not play a dominant role in adult caries but plays an important role in children's caries. Majda Dzidic et al. compared the bacteria in saliva of children with caries and children without caries from 3 months to 7 years old by high‐throughput sequencing. The experimental results showed that after 2 years of age, caries affected and caries‐free children had significantly different bacterial colonization patterns, but before 2 years of age, the difference was not obvious, and before 7 years of age, the incidence rate of caries was not significantly related to bacterial diversity or bacterial abundance. After 7 years of age, compared with children without dental caries, children with dental caries have higher levels of S. mutans and Streptococcus cristatus and lower level of Streptococcus dentisani. 5 Jørn A. Aas et al. believed that there were more kinds of health‐related bacteria isolated from the plaque of permanent teeth than that of deciduous teeth, but the main bacteria in deciduous teeth were still included in the plaque of permanent teeth. As for pathogenic bacteria, compared with deciduous teeth, there is a significantly greater overall diversity of bacteria related to permanent teeth caries. The distribution of bacteria at the beginning of caries (i.e., intact enamel and white plaque on enamel surface) is also more obvious and complex than that in the identified caries. At the same time, the main bacteria of adults and children are different in different stages and parts of caries development. When the caries was confined to the enamel and superficial dentin, high levels of S. parasanguinis and S. salivarius were observed in the dental plaque of both permanent and deciduous teeth, but high levels of Corynebacterium sp. clone AK153, and Actinomyces gerencseriae were detected in deciduous dentition and high levels of Leptotrichia sp. clone GT018, Campylobacter gracilis, and Selenomonas sp. clone EY04 were detected in permanent dentition. When the caries progressed to the deep dentine layer, the microbial community was dominated by S. mutans, Lactobacillus spp., Propionibacterium sp. strain FMA5, Atopobium genomospecies C1 (permanent teeth), and Bifidobacterium spp. (deciduous teeth). 32
In addition, it should not be ignored that early childhood caries (ECC) is a kind of caries that develops rapidly and has a wide range, especially in children under 6 years of age. The bacteria contained in the oral cavity of young children with ECC may be different from pathogenic bacteria of adult caries. The study found that children with severe early childhood caries had elevated levels of streptococci (especially Streptococcus mutans), Leptosella, Prevoella, oral bacillus, bifidobacteria, Porphyromonas and Salmonella in the mouth compared with children without dental caries. 33 Kanasi et al. compared the bacteria at different positions in oral cavity of children with EEC and caries‐free children and concluded that the related species of EEC mainly include: S. mutans, S. mutans combined with Streptococcus sobrinus, Lactobacillus vaginalis, Staphylococcus intermedius, Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus gasseri, Actinomyces odontolyticus, Actinomyces israelii, and Veillonella parvula. Among them, the pathogenic rate of S. mutans combined with S. sobrinus to EEC is higher than that of single S. mutans, and among the EEC detected by non S. mutans, it is S. intermedius that is more relevant. Prevotella nigrescens is the only species that is significantly associated with caries. Furthermore, the detected bacteria related to caries have a much higher content in dental plaque than in tongue and saliva, but it has little relationship with the tooth position. 34 Combined with other studies, it is found that S. mutans and Lactobacillus are the main bacteria in EEC, especially S. mutans, whose high number is an obvious feature of caries in young children. 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 The role of S. mutans in the development of caries may be related to its characteristics of acid production and acid resistance, and it can provide biofilm matrix for other cariogenic bacteria when the biofilm matures, thus, protecting the acidic environment where acid production and acid bacteria grow. 36 Moreover, other microorganisms such as human herpesvirus type 4 (Epstein–Barr virus [EBV]) and Candida albicans were confirmed to have higher levels in EEC than subjects with common caries or without caries 38 , 41 , 42 (Table 1).
Therefore, during the occurrence and development of caries, the pathogenic microorganisms of caries in adults and children are different. Adults mainly include salivary streptococcus, blood streptococcus, etc. S. mutans plays an important role in the development of caries in children. The microbial diversity of adults is higher than that of children.
2.2. Pulpal disease
Pulp disease is a general term for dental pulp tissue diseases. This section mainly introduces the microorganisms in the common diseases of pulpitis and pulp necrosis caused by infection and is limited to root canal. Bacteria are the most important pathogenic factor of dental pulp disease, mainly including facultative anaerobes and obligate anaerobes. Due to the characteristics of tooth structure, bacterial infection mainly comes from tooth defect, periodontal infection, and blood infection, among which microorganisms play a vital role. Many studies have shown that significant changes have taken place in the microbiota in the root canal of dental pulp infection, and the richness of dominant bacteria and species in different infection stages are also different. 43 , 44 Dental caries is an important cause of pulp infection. In the severe caries stage, when the decay is very close to the pulp, bacteria can infect the pulp through the dentinal tubules. 45 With the further development of the disease, the symptoms of reducible pulpitis, irreducible pulpitis, and pulp necrosis appear immediately.
With the development of caries, actinomycetes decreases and chlamydia increases. 44 As far as adults are concerned, Lactobacillus, Pseudoramibacter, Streptococcus, Propionibacterium, Olsenella, Actinomyces, Capnocytophaga, Capnocytophaga, and Leptotrichia are the main bacteria of the reducible pulpitis. 46 , 47 Irreducible pulpitis bacteria mainly include Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, Prevotella, Veron, Corynebacterium, Cutibacterium, and Porphyromonas. 44 , 48 Pulp necrosis bacteria mainly include Prevotella, Porphyromonas, and Peptostreptococcus. The relative abundance of Lactobacillus in irreducible pulpitis is higher than that in reducible pulpitis. 44
For children with irreducible pulpitis, root canal has been detected to be rich in Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, S. mutans, Staphylococcus aureus, and C. albicans. The content of anaerobes is less, and facultative anaerobes are more dominant than strict anaerobes. 49 The main bacteria detected in deciduous teeth with pulp necrosis include E. faecalis, S. salivarius, Hemolytic Streptococci (α, β, and γ), E. coli, S. aureus, and Proteus mirabilis. 50 , 51 , 52 Similarly, they are dominated by facultative anaerobes (Table 2). However, at present, the research objects of dental pulp infection bacteria mainly focus on individuals suffering from periapical infection, especially deciduous teeth pulpitis. Due to the difficulty in obtaining materials, the relevant research results are even rarer. Therefore, for the infection that has not developed to the stage of periapical periodontitis, more research is needed to detect the dominant bacteria and community characteristics.
TABLE 2.
The main pathogenic microorganisms of pulpal disease in adults and children.
| Disease | Adult reversible pulpitis | Adult irreversible pulpitis | Adult pulp necrosis | Irreducible pulpitis in children | Pulp necrosis in children |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main microorganisms |
|
|
|
|
|
2.3. Periapical periodontitis
With further development of the lesion, microorganisms in the necrotic pulp may spread to and around the root apex through special structures such as apical foramen, dentinal tubules, lateral root canals, apical furcations, and accessory root canals, leading to periapical periapical Inflammation, and even periapical granuloma, apical cyst or apical abscess may occur, eventually leading to tooth pain, looseness, formation of mucosa or buccal fistula and other symptoms. 53 , 54 For nonstandard root canal therapy or root canal therapy failure, periapical periodontitis is often one of the most common sequelae. However, deciduous teeth with periapical periodontitis may have some impact on the development or eruption of subsequent permanent teeth, such as the occurrence of Turner teeth. 55 , 56 The bacteria in periapical periodontitis are slightly different from those in pulpitis.
The most common microorganisms isolated from adult periapical periodontitis are mainly anaerobic bacteria. Wayman et al. successfully isolated Staphylococcus epidermidis, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Propionibacterium acnes, Peptostreptococcus micros, and Bacteroides gracilis from periapical tissues. 57 Combined with other studies, it can be concluded that the bacteria of adult periapical periodontitis are mainly Actinomycetes, Fusobacterium, and Prevotella, including C. gracilis, Porphyromonas endodontalis, Bacteroides forsythus, P. acnes, Capnocytophaga gingivalis, F. nucleatum ssp. nucleatum, F. nucleatum ssp. polymorphum, Prevotella intermedia, Treponema denticola, Streptococcus constellatus, Actinomyces naeslundii, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans (Aa), Eubacterium sabureum, P. micros, V. parvula, Streptococcus anginosus, Leptotrichia buccalis, Capnocytophaga sputigena, Streptococcus gordonii, Actinomyces viscosus, etc. 58 , 59 There are also a few research results showing that the root canals or periapical tissues of teeth with persistent infection of periapical periodontitis have also been found to contain fungi, especially C. albicans, in addition to Candida glabrata, Candida unspicua, Geotricum candium, etc. 60 EBV and human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) were also found in periapical tissues, 61 , 62 which suggests that viruses may also play a role in the occurrence and development of periapical periodontitis.
In children's periapical periodontitis, the detection rates of Porphyromonas, T. denticola, E. faecalis, Prevotella, Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Streptococcus, Eubacterium, Lactobacillus, Campylobacter, and Bulleidia were higher. Among them, Prevotella is the most dominant bacteria in periapical abscess of deciduous teeth, followed by Fusobacterium, Digestive Streptococcus, and Porphyromonas. 63 , 64 , 65 Teuta Kutllovci et al. found that the dominant bacteria group of periapical infection in children is anaerobic bacteria, mainly including Actinomyces mayeri, A. naeslundi, Actinomyces odontoliticus, Fusobacterium, Veillonella, and Lactobacillus. In acute infection, the detection rate of Actinomycetes in deciduous teeth is higher than that in chronic infection group, while the proportion of Fusobacterium in deciduous teeth is not closely related to the acute and chronic stages, and its content is always higher than that in permanent teeth group (Table 3). 65
TABLE 3.
The main pathogenic microorganisms of periapical periodontitis in adults and children.
| Disease | Adult periapical periodontitis | Periapical periodontitis in children | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main microorganisms |
|
|
|
Abbreviation: Aa, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans.
2.4. Periodontal disease
The most common forms of human periodontal disease are gingivitis and periodontitis. Gingivitis is an inflammatory disease that is limited to gingival tissue without causing attachment loss and alveolar bone absorption and is reversible. The bacterial flora related to adult gingivitis mainly includes TM7, Leptotrichia, Selenomonas, Streptococcus, Veillonella, Prevotella, Neisseria spp., Hafnia alvei, C. albicans, Lautropia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Haemophilus. 66 , 67
Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory disease. Its main symptoms include gingival redness and bleeding, alveolar bone absorption, and tooth mobility. The damage to tissues caused by periodontitis is irreversible. Its main cause is the presence of specific bacteria in the subgingival plaque biofilm and the change of the flora. 68 , 69 For this reason, it is of great significance to determine the dominant flora of periodontitis for the understanding and treatment of this disease. So far, Aggregatibacter actinomycetem, Tannerella forsythensis, and Porphyromonas gingivalis are almost recognized as the main pathogens leading to the onset and development of periodontitis. 70 , 71 The dominant bacteria in the saliva of patients with periodontitis are P. gingivalis, Ac. actinomycetemcomitans, and S. mutans. 29 , 72 , 73 Tanner et al. compared the flora on the back of the tongue and subgingival of early adult periodontitis samples and found that T. denticola, Filifactor alocis, F. nucleatum, and P. gingivalis were related to progressive periodontitis, and the subgingival samples were more reliable than tongue samples when detecting periodontal pathogens. 74 In addition, Riviere et al. found that the abundance of P. gingivalis under the gingiva of patients with early periodontitis was higher than that of healthy people, and the level of P. gingivalis in patients with gingivitis was higher than that in patients with early periodontitis. 75 Colombo et al. found that subgingival flora of adult periodontitis patients had more kinds and quantities of pathogenic bacteria than that of healthy individuals, such as Parvimonas micra, C. gracilis, Tannerella forsythia, P. gingivalis, Megasphaera micronuciformis, Eubacterium nodatum, Selenomonas noxia, Leptotrichia, V. parvula, Prevotella spp., Treponema spp., Eikenella corrodens, Pseudoramibacter alactolyticus, TM7 spp. oral taxon OT 346/356, Bacteroidetes sp. OT 272/274, Solobacterium moorei, Desulfobulbus sp. OT 041, Brevundimonas diminuta, Sphaerocytophaga sp. OT 337, Shuttleworthia satelles, F. alocis, Granulicatella adiacens, Mogibacterium timidum, Veillonella atypica, and Mycoplasma salivarium. 76 , 77 , 78 It has also been proved that the bacteria related to periodontal injury are mainly enterobacteria and C. albicans, Neisseria spp., P. aeruginosa, Olsenella uli, Hafnia alwei, Serratia marcescens, and F. alocis. 67
However, different from most oral anaerobes, with the growth of age, some periodontal pathogens usually do not colonize the oral cavity in the early stage, and most healthy children do not suffer from periodontitis. 79 , 80 Therefore, the bacteriological study of periodontal disease in healthy children is still rare. Morinushi et al. found that P. gingivalis and Actinomycetes appeared as early as 3 years old in children, and their existence was related to the onset and severity of gingivitis in children. 81 Sheila Cavalca Cortelli et al. detected that P. gingivalis was the most abundant bacteria in the gingival biofilm samples of 196 children with gingivitis, followed by Tannerella forsythensis, P. intermedia, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, and Campylobacter rectum. 82 P. intermedia, Eikenella corrodes, Black‐pigmented Bacteroides species, Bacteroides intermedius, Ac. actinomycetemcomitans, F. nucleatum, etc. also account for a high proportion of children's gingivitis bacteria. 83 In addition, Moore et al. found that F. nucleatum, Actinomyces WVa 963, Selenomonas D04, and Treponema socranskii were the main species related to the increase of gingival index scores in children and adults. Compared with adults who also suffer from gingivitis, the proportion of Leptotrichia species detected in children's dental plaque is 3 times higher, the proportion of Capnocytophaga species is 2.5 times higher, and the proportion of Selenomonas species is 2.3 times higher, but the proportion of Fusobacterium, Eubacterium, and Lactobacillus in adults is higher. 84 As for children with invasive periodontitis, Aa is considered to be the main pathogenic bacteria in subgingival plaque, and the abundance of F. alocis, Tannerella, S. moorei, Parvimonas microca, and Capnocytophaga is also high. 85
Researchers analyzed the viruses detected in subgingival samples of patients with periodontitis and found that the levels of EBV, HCMV, and HSV‐1 increased with the severity of periodontal disease, 86 and the amounts of these viruses were related to P. gingivalis, T. denticola, Fusobacterium periodonticum, and S. aureus in periodontal tissue. 87 However, there is no definite evidence that there must be a relationship between the virus and the pathogenic bacteria of periodontitis, 88 , 89 , 90 perhaps this can also become a new research hotspot.
Moreover, we see that the main microorganisms of periodontitis or gingivitis in children and adults are similar, but the proportion of dominant microorganisms is different between adults and children (Table 4). At present, most of the microbiological samples related to periodontitis are taken from saliva or subgingival plaque. There are relatively few studies on gingival crevicular fluid. Although there are quite rich studies on adult periodontitis, there are few studies on children with periodontitis, so we need to use more samples to further explore the oral dominant microorganisms of children's periodontitis.
TABLE 4.
The main pathogenic microorganisms of periodontal disease in adults and children.
| Disease | Adult gingivitis | Adult periodontitis | Gingivitis in children | Periodontitis in children | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main microorganisms |
|
|
|
|
|
Abbreviations: Aa, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans; HCMV, human cytomegalovirus.
2.5. Oral mucosal disease
Oral mucosal disease refers to the general term of oral mucosal and soft tissue diseases. The causes of mucosal disease are complex, and most of them are related to the general and mental state. This part mainly introduces the oral microorganisms related to denture stomatitis, recurrent aphthous ulcer, and angular stomatitis. The main microorganisms of adults and children in common mucosal diseases are summarized in Table 5.
TABLE 5.
The main pathogenic microorganisms of oral mucosal disease in adults and children.
| Disease | Adult denture stomatitis | Dental stomatitis in children | Adult angular stomatitis | Angular stomatitis in children | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main microorganisms |
|
|
|
|
|
2.5.1. Denture stomatitis
Denture stomatitis is a mucosal disease in the mouth of patients wearing dentures. It mainly occurs in and near the mucosa covered by dentures. It shows that the corresponding mucosa has edema, erythema, pseudomembrane, ulcer or even erosion, and the patient feels pain or burning. 91 , 92 , 93 Elderly people who have lost their teeth and children who have early occlusion induction are the two main groups who use dentures. Among them, the incidence rate of denture stomatitis is also high. 92 Due to poor oral hygiene or inadequate denture cleaning, biofilms quickly form on the denture surface. These biofilms are composed of candida and other bacteria, which can not only adhere to the denture surface, but also gradually spread to other parts of the mouth. So far, there are many evidences that C. albicans infection is an important factor leading to the disease, 94 , 95 , 96 but due to the diversity of oral bacterial community, more and more studies have found that there are many other kinds of microorganisms related to denture stomatitis. In healthy adults with denture stomatitis, the main microorganisms detected include C. glabrata, Candida tropicalis, Candida krusei, Candida parapsilosis, Candida dubliniensis, S. aureus, S. epidermidis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and Pseudomonas fluorescens. 97 , 98 Webb et al. found that the location of candida colonization is mainly on the surface of dentures. Compared with denture wearers without denture stomatitis, denture plaque is composed of basically similar flora, but the contents of Streptococcus species, Actinomyces species, and Veillonella species in denture stomatitis patients are less, and the content of Propionibacterium species and Lactobacillus species is higher. 95
In most cases, the dentures worn by children are orthodontic movable appliances. Due to the long wearing time, children's self‐oral cleaning is not in place and other reasons are that the children wearing dentures also often have symptoms such as swollen mucosa. Many studies have found that the number of S. mutans, E. coli, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, Candida, and Lactobacillus is higher in children who are treated with movable orthodontic appliances, and the content of Streptococcus is significantly higher than that of Candida. 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 There is a direct relationship between the use of removable orthodontic appliances and the increase of periodontal pathogens.
2.5.2. Recurrent aphthous ulcer
Recurrent aphthous ulcer is a recurrent, self‐limited oral mucosal disease with complex etiology. The clinical symptoms are red or yellowish depressions on the oral mucosa, accompanied by erosion and pain. The disease usually first occurs in children or teenagers and often persists throughout life. 103 , 104 , 105 At present, the research on recurrent aphthous ulceration (RAU) related pathogens is still in a small stage, but few people believe that Streptococcus, especially S. sanguis may participate in the occurrence of RAU, and RAU may be a result of T cell‐mediated reaction to S. sanguis. 106 , 107 Some subpopulations of Prevotella, Neisseria, and Streptococcus, such as Prevotella melaninogenicus, Neisseria lactamica, Neisseria mucosa, Neisseria saprophaga, Neisseria subflava, Streptococcus viridans, S. mutans, and S. aureus, may be related to the occurrence of RAU. 108 The significant increase in the number of Prevotella at the ulcer site more effectively indicates that Prevotella is closely related to RAU. 109 For Helicobacter pylori, there is still no direct evidence to prove that it is related to the occurrence and development of RAU. 110 There is less research on viruses. At present, only a small number of people think that EBV is related to the epithelial cells of recurrent aphthous stomatitis before ulcer. 111
2.5.3. Angular stomatitis
Angular stomatitis is an infectious disease that occurs at the joint of the upper and lower lips, mainly manifested as chaps, flushing, dander or erosion. The bacteria associated with adult angular stomatitis are mainly found to be Candida albieans, C. parapsilosis, C. krusei, S. aureus, Beta aerolytic streptococci, E. coli, and other microorganisms. 112 , 113 Microbes related to children's angular stomatitis mainly include S. aureus, Enterobacter cloacae, Staphylococcus warneri, C. tropicalis, Dermacoccus nishinomiyaensis, etc. S. aureus is the most dominant bacteria. 114 K. pneumoniae, S. gordonii, Streptococcus oralis, Bordetella bronchiseptica, Streptococcus pseudoporcinus, Streptococcus agalactiae, S. salivarius, Gamella morbilorium, and other bacteria are also suspected to be related to the progress of angular stomatitis. 114
3. CONCLUSION
Due to the difficulty of plaque collection in clinical practice, the main microbial test samples are mainly from saliva, tongue back, dental plaque, or affected tissues. With the progress of science and technology, the identification of microorganisms has gradually changed from isolation and culture of microorganisms to DNA fingerprinting, and then to the current high‐throughput sequencing or mass spectrometry identification technology. The number of microorganisms detected in the mouth has increased from more than 700 to more than 10,000. Our understanding of microorganisms has also changed from simple morphology and classification to current gene, protein, or metabonomics. The relationship between microorganisms or between microorganisms and hosts is gradually becoming clear. However, there are many kinds and large quantities of microorganisms. The role of microorganisms in different environments and their impact on human diseases are still a major research focus today. In this review, the main microorganisms of adults and children in common oral diseases are collated and compared horizontally by consulting relevant literature, which may have new enlightenment for the microbial research of the same oral disease at different stages.
Therefore, we believe that the same disease has different microbial species types and abundance between adults and children, which may be related to the replacement of microbial populations during the growth and development of healthy individuals, or to the environmental changes, oral hygiene maintenance, or the mutual influence of other diseases during the growth process. First, at different stages of the same disease, the population richness and dominant species of microorganisms are different. For example, in the acute stage of periapical periodontitis of deciduous teeth, A. mayeri is the most abundant bacteria detected, and in the chronic stage, it becomes Anaerococus prvoti. 65 With the development of dental caries, the number of actinomycetes decreases, and the increase of chlamydia is also a direct proof of this view. 44 Secondly, the core microorganisms of the same disease are different between adults and children. Similarly, in acute periapical infection, even though the dominant bacteria in adults and children are A. mayeri, the relative number of these microorganisms detected in adults is higher than that in children. In the chronic phase, the relative number of these microorganisms detected in adults is basically lower than that in children. The dominant bacteria in adults is still A. mayeri, and in children it becomes A. prvoti. 65 Thirdly, the main microbial species of children and adults identified in different diseases also have some overlap. For example, children with dental caries in young children more frequently detect subgingival species such as P. micromera, F. alocis, P. gingivalis, Prevotella nigescens, Porphyromonas intantalis, Aa, and L. buccalis. This may be related to the onset of gingivitis in children or even periodontitis in adolescence, and this part of the population may have a greater probability of periodontitis in adulthood. 34 It is worth noting that the occurrence and development of these common oral diseases are not only caused by one or several microorganisms. Various microorganisms interact to form biofilms, thus, exerting their pathogenicity. The dominant microorganisms at different stages are also different, which is also affected by the original oral flora. Some bacteria were originally related to health, but due to the addition of other bacteria, it may become an opportunistic pathogen.
At present, the research on the main flora of oral diseases in adults and children is still mostly focused on the comparison of oral flora between mothers and children or the influence of mothers' illness on oral flora of children. In terms of longitudinal research, for example, there are still few studies on the main oral flora of patients with the same disease from childhood to adulthood, or on oral diseases with a high prevalence rate in the same family or region, oral flora changes of adults and children, etc. We can only summarize the main flora of children and adults with common and different oral diseases by comparing the existing research results and by trying to provide some new ideas or directions for this research.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Siqi Zhou took part in the conception of this review, drafted the article, and drew the figures. Tong Chuan He and Yuxin Zhang revised this manuscript. Hongmei Zhang guided this project, critically revised the article for important intellectual content and performed the final approval of the version to be submitted. All authors read and approved this manuscript.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
Prof. Tong‐Chuan He is the Editor‐in‐Chief of Pediatric Discovery. To minimize bias, he was excluded from all editorial decision‐making related to the acceptance of this article for publication. The other authors declare no competing conflict of interest.
ETHICS STATEMENT
Not applicable.
CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION
Not applicable.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The reported work was supported in part by research grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (#cstc2021jcyj‐msxmX0560 to HZ).
Zhou S, He T‐C, Zhang Y, Zhang H. Comparison of the main pathogenic microorganisms of various common oral diseases in children and adults. Pediatr Discov. 2023;1(3):e35. 10.1002/pdi3.35
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
REFERENCES
- 1. Nelson‐Filho P, Borba IG, de Mesquita KSF, Silva RAB, de Queiroz AM, Silva LAB. Dynamics of microbial colonization of the oral cavity in newborns. Braz Dent J. 2013;24(4):415‐419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Ward TL, Dominguez‐Bello MG, Heisel T, Al‐Ghalith G, Knights D, Gale CA. Development of the human mycobiome over the first month of life and across body sites. MSystems. 2018;3:e001400‐17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Könönen E. Development of oral bacterial flora in young children. Ann Med. 2000;32(2):107‐112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Rotimi VO, Duerden BI. The development of the bacterial flora in normal neonates. J Med Microbiol. 1981;14(1):51‐62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Dzidic M, Collado MC, Abrahamsson T, et al. Oral microbiome development during childhood: an ecological succession influenced by postnatal factors and associated with tooth decay. ISME J. 2018;12(9):2292‐2306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Mason MR, Chambers S, Dabdoub SM, Thikkurissy S, Kumar PS. Characterizing oral microbial communities across dentition states and colonization niches. Microbiome. 2018;6(1):67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Costello EK, Lauber CL, Hamady M, Fierer N, Gordon JI, Knight R. Bacterial community variation in human body habitats across space and time. Science. 2009;326(5960):1694‐1697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Crielaard W, Zaura E, Schuller AA, Huse SM, Montijn RC, Keijser BJ. Exploring the oral microbiota of children at various developmental stages of their dentition in the relation to their oral health. BMC Med Genom. 2011;4(1):22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Cortelli JR, Fernandes CB, Costa FO, et al. Detection of periodontal pathogens in newborns and children with mixed dentition. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31(6):1041‐1050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Everhart DL, Bamgboye PO, Schwartz MS. Salivary anti‐streptococcus mutans changes over a six‐month period in children ages two ‐ five years. J Dent Res. 1982;61(2):386‐390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Keijser BJF, Zaura E, Huse SM, et al. Pyrosequencing analysis of the oral microflora of healthy adults. J Dent Res. 2008;87(11):1016‐1020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Kleinegger CL, Lockhart SR, Vargas K, Soll DR. Frequency, intensity, species, and strains of oral Candida vary as a function of host age. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34(9):2246‐2254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Stecksén‐Blicks C, Granström E, Silfverdal SA, West CE. Prevalence of oral Candida in the first year of life. Mycoses. 2015;58(9):550‐556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Ghannoum MA, Jurevic RJ, Mukherjee PK, et al. Characterization of the oral fungal microbiome (mycobiome) in healthy individuals. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6(1):e1000713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Flett K, Youngster I, Huang J, et al. Hand, foot, and mouth disease caused by coxsackievirus A6. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18(10):1702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Xiao J, Fiscella KA, Gill SR. Oral microbiome: possible harbinger for children’s health. Int J Oral Sci. 2020;12(1):12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Arduino PG, Porter SR. Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 infection: overview on relevant clinico‐pathological features*: HSV‐1 literature review. J Oral Pathol Med. 2007;37(2):107‐121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Puranen M, Yliskoski M, Saarikoski S, Syrjänen K, Syrjänen S. Vertical transmission of human papillomavirus from infected mothers to their newborn babies and persistence of the virus in childhood. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(2):694‐699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Samaranayake LP. Oral mycoses in HIV infection, oral surgery, oral medicine. Oral Pathol. 1992;73(2):171‐180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Wang C‐Y, Li Lu F, Wu M‐H, Lee C‐Y, Huang L‐M. Fatal coxsackievirus A16 infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004;23(3):275‐276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. van Best N, Hornef MW, Savelkoul PHM, Penders J. On the origin of species: factors shaping the establishment of infant’s gut microbiota. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2015;105(4):240‐251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Milnes AR. Description and epidemiology of nursing caries. J Publ Health Dent. 1996;56(1):38‐50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Anderson M. Risk assessment and epidemiology of dental caries: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24:377‐385. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Frencken JE, Sharma P, Stenhouse L, Green D, Laverty D, Dietrich T. Global epidemiology of dental caries and severe periodontitis ‐ a comprehensive review. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44(Suppl 18):S94‐S105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Sanz M, Beighton D, Curtis MA, et al. Role of microbial biofilms in the maintenance of oral health and in the development of dental caries and periodontal diseases. Consensus report of group 1 of the joint EFP/ORCA workshop on the boundaries between caries and periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44(Suppl 18):S5‐S11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Simón‐Soro A, Belda‐Ferre P, Cabrera‐Rubio R, Alcaraz LD, Mira A. A tissue‐dependent hypothesis of dental caries. Caries Res. 2013;47(6):591‐600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Xiao C, Ran S, Huang Z, Liang J. Bacterial diversity and community structure of supragingival plaques in adults with dental health or caries revealed by 16S pyrosequencing. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Li Y, Ku CYS, Xu J, Saxena D, Caufield PW. Survey of oral microbial diversity using PCR‐based denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. J Dent Res. 2005;84(6):559‐564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Belstrøm D, Fiehn N‐E, Nielsen CH, et al. Altered bacterial profiles in saliva from adults with caries lesions: a case‐cohort study. Caries Res. 2014;48(5):368‐375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Yang F, Zeng X, Ning K, et al. Saliva microbiomes distinguish caries‐active from healthy human populations. ISME J. 2012;6:1‐10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Belstrøm D, Fiehn N‐E, Nielsen CH, et al. Differentiation of salivary bacterial profiles of subjects with periodontitis and dental caries. J Oral Microbiol. 2015;7(1):27429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Aas JA, Griffen AL, Dardis SR, et al. Bacteria of dental caries in primary and permanent teeth in children and young adults. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(4):1407‐1417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. He J, Li Y, Cao Y, Xue J, Zhou X. The oral microbiome diversity and its relation to human diseases. Folia Microbiol. 2015;60(1):69‐80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Kanasi E, Johansson I, Lu SC, et al. Microbial risk markers for childhood caries in pediatricians’ offices. J Dent Res. 2010;89(4):378‐383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. van Houte J, Gibbs G, Butera C. Oral flora of children with “nursing bottle caries”. J Dent Res. 1982;61(2):382‐385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Hajishengallis E, Parsaei Y, Klein MI, Koo H. Advances in the microbial etiology and pathogenesis of early childhood caries. Mol Oral Microbiol. 2017;32(1):24‐34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Zheng H, Xie T, Li S, Qiao X, Lu Y, Feng Y. Analysis of oral microbial dysbiosis associated with early childhood caries. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Baker JL, Morton JT, Dinis M, et al. Deep metagenomics examines the oral microbiome during dental caries, revealing novel taxa and co‐occurrences with host molecules. Genome Res. 2021;31(1):64‐74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Hughes CV, Dahlan M, Kent RL Jr, et al. Aciduric microbiota and mutans streptococci in severe and recurrent severe early childhood caries. Pediatr Dent. 2013;34(2):17. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Qudeimat MA, Alyahya A, Karched M, Behbehani J, Salako NO. Dental plaque microbiota profiles of children with caries‐free and caries‐active dentition. J Dent. 2021;104:103539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Xiao J, Huang X, Alkhers N, et al. Candida albicans and early childhood caries: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Caries Res. 2018;52(1‐2):102‐112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Raja M, Hannan A, Ali K. Association of oral candidal carriage with dental caries in children. Caries Res. 2010;44(3):272‐276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Hsiao WW, Li KL, Liu Z, Jones C, Fraser‐Liggett CM, Fouad AF. Microbial transformation from normal oral microbiota to acute endodontic infections. BMC Genom. 2012;13(1):345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Zheng J, Wu Z, Niu K, et al. Microbiome of deep dentinal caries from reversible pulpitis to irreversible pulpitis. J Endod. 2019;45(3):302‐309.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Narayanan LL, Vaishnavi C. Endodontic microbiology. J Conserv Dent. 2010;13(4):233‐239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Caneppele TMF, de Souza LG, Spinola M da S, et al. Bacterial levels and amount of endotoxins in carious dentin within reversible pulpitis scenarios. Clin Oral Invest. 2021;25(5):3033‐3042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Sun C, Xie Y, Hu X, Fu J, Zhou J, Wu L. Relationship between clinical symptoms and the microbiota in advanced caries. J Endod. 2020;46(6):763‐770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Zahran S, Witherden E, Mannocci F, Koller G. Characterization of root canal microbiota in teeth diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod. 2021;47(3):415‐423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Hegde A, Pallavi K. Prevalence of selected microorganisms in the pulp space of human deciduous teeth with irreversible pulpitis. Endodontology. 2013;25(1):107. [Google Scholar]
- 50. Rana V, Baba SM, Pandey A. Bacteriology of infected deciduous root canal – a review. People J Sci Res. 2009;2(2):45‐48. [Google Scholar]
- 51. Stuart CH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ, Owatz CB. Enterococcus faecalis: its role in root canal treatment failure and current concepts in retreatment. J Endod. 2006;32(2):93‐98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Chandwani M, Chandak S. Assessment of facultative anaerobes from the root canals of deciduous molars: an in vivo study. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2017;11(2):96‐100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Ørstavik D. Apical periodontitis: microbial infection and host responses. In: Ørstavik D, ed. Essential Endodontology. 1st ed. Wiley; 2019:1‐10. [Google Scholar]
- 54. Nair PNR. Pathogenesis of apical periodontitis and the causes of endodontic failures. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004;15(6):348‐381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Bauer WH. Effect of periapical processes of deciduous teeth on the buds of permanent teeth; pathological‐clinical study. Am J Orthod Oral Surg. 1946;32(4):232‐241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Valderhaug J. Periapical inflammation in primary teeth and its effect on the permanent successors. Int J Oral Surg. 1974;3(4):171‐182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Wayman BE, Murata SM, Almeida RJ, Fowler CB. A bacteriological and histological evaluation of 58 periapical lesions. J Endod. 1992;18(4):152‐155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Bronzato JD, Bomfim RA, Hayasida GZP, et al. Analysis of microorganisms in periapical lesions: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Arch Oral Biol. 2021;124:105055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Zhang C, Yang Z, Hou B. Diverse bacterial profile in extraradicular biofilms and periradicular lesions associated with persistent apical periodontitis. Int Endod J. 2021;54(9):1425‐1433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Waltimo TMT, Sirén EK, Torkko HLK, Olsen I, Haapasalo MPP. Fungi in therapy‐resistant apical periodontitis. Int Endod J. 1997;30(2):96‐101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Hernádi K, Szalmás A, Mogyorósi R, et al. Prevalence and activity of Epstein‐Barr virus and human cytomegalovirus in symptomatic and asymptomatic apical periodontitis lesions. J Endod. 2010;36(9):1485‐1489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Jakovljevic A, Andric M, Knezevic A, et al. Human cytomegalovirus and Epstein‐Barr virus genotypes in apical periodontitis lesions. J Endod. 2015;41(11):1847‐1851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Yang Q‐B, Fan L‐N, Shi Q. Polymerase chain reaction–denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, cloning, and sequence analysis of bacteria associated with acute periapical abscesses in children. J Endod. 2010;36(2):218‐223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. da Silva LAB, Nelson‐Filho P, Faria G, de Souza‐Gugelmin MCM, Ito IY. Bacterial profile in primary teeth with necrotic pulp and periapical lesions. Braz Dent J. 2006;17(2):144‐148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Kutllovci T, Iljovska S, Begzati A, et al. Bacteriological identification of selected pathogens in infected primary and young permanent teeth associated with clinical symptoms. OJMM. 2015;5(02):59‐68. [Google Scholar]
- 66. Huang S, Yang F, Zeng X, et al. Preliminary characterization of the oral microbiota of Chinese adults with and without gingivitis. BMC Oral Health. 2011;11(1):33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Vieira Colombo AP, Magalhães CB, Hartenbach FARR, Martins do Souto R, Maciel da Silva‐Boghossian C. Periodontal‐disease‐associated biofilm: a reservoir for pathogens of medical importance. Microb Pathog. 2016;94:27‐34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Radaic A, Kapila YL. The oralome and its dysbiosis: new insights into oral microbiome‐host interactions. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021;19:1335‐1360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Hajishengallis G. Immunomicrobial pathogenesis of periodontitis: keystones, pathobionts, and host response. Trends Immunol. 2014;35(1):3‐11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Kinane DF, Stathopoulou PG, Papapanou PN. Periodontal diseases. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2017;3(1):17038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Sanz M, Lau L, Herrera D, Morillo JM, Silva A. Methods of detection of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis and Tannerella forsythensis in periodontal microbiology, with special emphasis on advanced molecular techniques: a review. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31(12):1034‐1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Belstrøm D, Fiehn N‐E, Nielsen CH, et al. Differences in bacterial saliva profile between periodontitis patients and a control cohort. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41(2):104‐112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Belstrøm D, Holmstrup P, Nielsen CH, et al. Bacterial profiles of saliva in relation to diet, lifestyle factors, and socioeconomic status. J Oral Microbiol. 2014;6(1):23609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Tanner ACR, Paster BJ, Lu SC, et al. Subgingival and tongue microbiota during early periodontitis. J Dent Res. 2006;85(4):318‐323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Riviere GR, Smith KS, Tzagaroulaki E, et al. Periodontal status and detection frequency of bacteria at sites of periodontal health and gingivitis. J Periodontol. 1996;67(2):109‐115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Colombo APV, Boches SK, Cotton SL, et al. Comparisons of subgingival microbial profiles of refractory periodontitis, severe periodontitis, and periodontal health using the human oral microbe identification microarray. J Periodontol. 2009;80(9):1421‐1432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Colombo APV, Bennet S, Cotton SL, et al. Impact of periodontal therapy on the subgingival microbiota of severe periodontitis: comparison between good responders and individuals with refractory periodontitis using the human oral microbe identification microarray. J Periodontol. 2012;83(10):1279‐1287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Lundmark A, Hu YOO, Huss M, Johannsen G, Andersson AF, Yucel‐Lindberg T. Identification of salivary microbiota and its association with host inflammatory mediators in periodontitis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;9:216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Griffen AL, Becker MR, Lyons SR, Moeschberger ML, Leys EJ. Prevalence of Porphyromonas gingivalis and periodontal health status. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36(11):3239‐3242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Rotimi VO, Salako NO, Divia M, Asfour L, Kononen E. Prevalence of periodontal bacteria in saliva of Kuwaiti children at different age groups. J Inf Public Health. 2010;3(2):76‐82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Morinushi T, Lopatin DE, Van Poperin N, Ueda Y. The relationship between gingivitis and colonization by Porphyromonas gingivalis and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans in children. J Periodontol. 2000;71(3):403‐409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Cortelli SC, Cortelli JR, Aquino DR, et al. Clinical status and detection of periodontopathogens and Streptococcus mutans in children with high levels of supragingival biofilm. Braz Oral Res. 2009;23(3):313‐318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Tsuruda K, Miyake Y, Suginaka H, Okamoto H, Iwamoto Y. Microbiological features of gingivitis in pubertal children. J Clin Periodontol. 1995;22(4):316‐320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Moore WE, Holdeman LV, Smibert RM, et al. Bacteriology of experimental gingivitis in children. Infect Immun. 1984;46:1‐6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Shaddox LM, Huang H, Lin T, et al. Microbiological characterization in children with aggressive periodontitis. J Dent Res. 2012;91(10):927‐933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Slots J. Periodontal herpesviruses: prevalence, pathogenicity, systemic risk. Periodontol. 2015;69(1):28‐45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Passariello C, Gigola P, Testarelli L, Puttini M, Schippa S, Petti S. Evaluation of microbiota associated with Herpesviruses in active sites of generalized aggressive periodontitis. Ann Stomatol. 2017;8(2):59‐70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Stein JM, Said Yekta S, Kleines M, et al. Failure to detect an association between aggressive periodontitis and the prevalence of herpesviruses. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40:1‐7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Pérez‐Brocal V, Moya A. The analysis of the oral DNA virome reveals which viruses are widespread and rare among healthy young adults in Valencia (Spain). PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0191867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Baker JL, Bor B, Agnello M, Shi W, He X. Ecology of the oral microbiome: beyond bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 2017;25(5):362‐374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Arendorf TM, Walker DM. Denture stomatitis: a review. J Oral Rehabil. 1987;14(3):217‐227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Gendreau L, Loewy ZG. Epidemiology and etiology of denture stomatitis: denture stomatitis. J Prosthodont. 2011;20(4):251‐260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Wilson J. The aetiology, diagnosis and management of denture stomatitis. Br Dent J. 1998;185(8):380‐384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Ramage G, Tomsett K, Wickes BL, López‐Ribot JL, Redding SW. Denture stomatitis: a role for Candida biofilms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004;98(1):53‐59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Webb BC, Thomas CJ, Willcox MD, Harty DW, Knox KW. Candida‐associated denture stomatitis. Aetiology and management: a review. Part 1. Factors influencing distribution of Candida species in the oral cavity. Aust Dent J. 1998;43:45‐50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Budtz‐Jörgensen E. The significance of Candida albicans in denture stomatitis. Scand J Dent Res. 1974;82(2):151‐190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Pereira CA, Toledo BC, Santos CT, et al. Opportunistic microorganisms in individuals with lesions of denture stomatitis. Diagnostic Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;76(4):419‐424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Pires FR, Santos EBD, Bonan PRF, De Almeida OP, Lopes MA. Denture stomatitis and salivary Candida in Brazilian edentulous patients. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29(11):1115‐1119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Demling A, Elter C, Heidenblut T, et al. Reduction of biofilm on orthodontic brackets with the use of a polytetrafluoroethylene coating. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32(4):414‐418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Hägg U, Kaveewatcharanont P, Samaranayake YH, Samaranayake LP. The effect of fixed orthodontic appliances on the oral carriage of Candida species and Enterobacteriaceae. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26(6):623‐629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Rodríguez‐Rentería M, Márquez‐Preciado R, Ortiz‐Magdaleno M, Bermeo‐Escalona J, Sánchez‐Vargas LO. Frequency of pathogenic microorganisms in removable orthodontic appliances and oral mucosa in children. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;45(2):135‐139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Domenyuk D, Vedeshina E, Zelenskiy V, et al. Study of the spectrum of dental composites biological activity in model experiments in vitro. Medical News of the North Caucasus. 2016;11(2). [Google Scholar]
- 103. Jurge S, Kuffer R, Scully C, Porter SR. Mucosal disease series. Number VI. Recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Oral Dis. 2006;12:1‐21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Sánchez‐Bernal J, Conejero C, Conejero R. Recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2020;111(6):471‐480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Akintoye SO, Greenberg MS. Recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Dent Clin North Am. 2014;58(2):281‐297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Lennette EH, Magoffin RL. Virologic and immunologic aspects of major oral ulcerations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1973;87(5):1055‐1073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Lehner T, Lavery E, Smith R, van der Zee R, Mizushima Y, Shinnick T. Association between the 65‐kilodalton heat shock protein, Streptococcus sanguis, and the corresponding antibodies in Behçet’s syndrome. Infect Immun. 1991;59(4):1434‐1441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Fahimeh A, Sedighe AH, Zahra Y, Banafsheh F, Fatemeh F. Recurrent aphthous stomatitis and oral microflora: is there a relationship? J Posit School Psychol. 2022;6(7):3438‐3444. [Google Scholar]
- 109. Cai R, Bi W, Yu Y. Detection and analysis of the oral flora in patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Evid Base Compl Altern Med. 2022;2022:1‐7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Gomes C, Gomez R, Zina L, Amaral F. Recurrent aphthous stomatitis and Helicobacter pylori . Med Oral. 2016:e187‐e191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Sun A, Chang J‐G, Chu C‐T, Liu B‐Y, Yuan JH, Chiang C‐P. Preliminary evidence for an association of Epstein‐Barr virus with pre‐ulcerative oral lesions in patients with recurrent aphthous ulcers or Behiçet’s disease. J Oral Pathol Med. 2007;27(4):168‐175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Warnakulasuriya KAAS, Samaranayake LP, Peiris JSM. Angular cheilitis in a group of Sri Lankan adults: a clinical and microbiologic study. J Oral Pathol Med. 1991;20(4):172‐175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Dias A, Samaranayake L. Clinical, microbiological and ultrastructural features of angular cheilitis lesions in Southern Chinese. Oral Dis. 2008;1:43‐48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Lubis WH, Nurdiana N, Hasibuan M. Microorganism and antimicrobial sensitivity patterns of angular cheilitis in children. http://repository.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/70184
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
