Abstract
Heterologous proteins secreted by yeast and fungal expression hosts are occasionally degraded at basic amino acids. We cloned Pichia pastoris homologs of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae basic residue-specific endoproteases Kex2 and Yps1 to evaluate their involvement in the degradation of a secreted mammalian gelatin. Disruption of the P. pastoris KEX2 gene prevented proteolysis of the foreign protein at specific monoarginylic sites. The S. cerevisiae α-factor preproleader used to direct high-level gelatin secretion was correctly processed at its dibasic site in the absence of the prototypical proprotein convertase Kex2. Disruption of the YPS1 gene had no effect on gelatin degradation or processing of the α-factor propeptide. When both the KEX2 and YPS1 genes were disrupted, correct precursor maturation no longer occurred. The different substrate specificities of both proteases and their mutual redundancy for propeptide processing indicate that P. pastoris kex2 and yps1 single-gene disruptants can be used for the α-factor leader-directed secretion of heterologous proteins otherwise degraded at basic residues.
Targeting heterologous proteins for secretion can be an advantageous production strategy with eukaryotic microorganisms. Protein secretion allows for folding and posttranslational modification of the foreign protein and can serve as a means to circumvent toxicity problems associated with the intracellular accumulation of some proteins. Furthermore, downstream processing is usually achieved more easily with secreted proteins than with intracellular proteins.
In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the preproregion of the yeast's α-factor mating pheromone is commonly fused to heterologous proteins to direct their efficient secretion (11). The α-factor propeptide is removed in a late Golgi compartment through cleavage C-terminal to Lys-Arg by the membrane-bound protease Kex2 (27). This prototypical proprotein convertase (also known as kexin; EC 3.4.21.61) is a member of the subtilisin superfamily of serine proteases and is specific for (mostly paired) basic amino acids.
The preprosequence of the S. cerevisiae α-factor is also widely used for the secretion of heterologous proteins by the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris and is the most successful leader sequence employed thus far in this expression system (15). It is generally assumed that α-factor propeptide processing in P. pastoris is also effectuated by a Kex2 homolog. We have used the α-factor preprosequence in P. pastoris to obtain efficient secretion of mammalian gelatins with yields as high as ∼15 g/liter of clarified fermentation broth (46). These gelatins are nonhydroxylated segments of collagen α-chains, which are essentially in the random coil conformation and, therefore, nongelling (46). Traditional animal gelatin is a versatile biomaterial with both medical and technical applications. Gelatins produced in microbial systems provide the added benefit of being well defined, free of animal-derived contagious agents, and suitable for modification for specific needs (35, 46, 47).
Although gelatin production in P. pastoris was very successful in terms of productivity, a 53-kDa gelatin derived from the murine type I collagen α-chain (referred to as Col1a1-2) was proteolytically cleaved C-terminal to two occurrences of the monobasic sequence Met-Gly-Pro-Arg (46). This motif is similar to known nondibasic Kex2 substrates, which led to the hypothesis that the putative P. pastoris α-factor leader processing Kex2 homolog was responsible for the observed cleavage. Removal of the Met-Gly-Pro-Arg motifs from the gene construct by site-directed mutagenesis resulted in the production of a predominantly full-length product and a number of shorter fragments present in lower quantities (46). A custom-designed gelatin with no Arg residues was produced completely intact, so we hypothesized that the minor fragments may have originated from limited Kex2-like proteolysis at suboptimal monoarginylic motifs (47). In addition to a Kex2 homolog, the aspartic yapsin proteases (18, 30, 36) could also be involved, since their substrate specificities overlap those of Kex2 in S. cerevisiae (10). Yps1 (yapsin 1, previously termed Yap3; EC 3.4.23.41) is the best-characterized yapsin and is primarily active at the plasma membrane but is also found in the extracellular medium and transiently active in the late secretory pathway (2, 14, 28). It has frequently been implicated in the degradation of secreted heterologous proteins at basic amino acids in S. cerevisiae (see, for example, reference 28).
Our objective in this study was to isolate and disrupt the P. pastoris genes encoding Kex2 and Yps1 and to evaluate the utility of these gene disruptants for the production of intact Col1a1-2 gelatin. The development of P. pastoris strains deficient in proteolysis at basic residues should be valuable for the industrial production of medically or technically important proteins.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
P. pastoris strains and media.
The P. pastoris GS115-based strain subjected to gene disruptions in this study was the previously described Col1a1-2 gelatin-producing strain COL1A1-2 (46). The expression vector used in this strain was derived from pPIC9 (Invitrogen, Breda, The Netherlands) and encodes a translational fusion of the S. cerevisiae α-factor prepropeptide and 53 kDa of the helical domain of murine type I collagen (32). Strain COL1A1-2* produces a variant of Col1a1-2 referred to as Col1a1-2*, in which the proteolyzed Met-Gly-Pro-Arg motifs had been removed by site-directed mutagenesis of the encoding gene (46).
Yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) medium (Duchefa, Haarlem, The Netherlands) contained 10 g/liter yeast extract, 20 g/liter peptone, and 20 g/liter dextrose. Minimal dextrose medium consisted of 13.4 g/liter yeast nitrogen base without amino acids (Sigma, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands), 10 g/liter dextrose, and 0.4 mg/liter biotin. Basal salts medium was as described by Zhang et al. (49).
Protein sequence analyses.
Pairwise alignment of amino acid sequences and calculation of percent identity and similarity were performed with the EMBOSS Needle program (38). The PAM250 similarity matrix was used, the gap opening penalty was 10, and the gap extension penalty was 0.5. The Pfam server (6) was used to search for functional protein domains. Secretory signal prediction was done with the SignalP neural network (34). Sequences were analyzed for the presence of potential transmembrane domains with SOSUI (25). Glycosylphosphatidylinositol modification sites were predicted with the fungal big-Π predictor (19).
Cloning of P. pastoris KEX2.
An ∼0.4-kb fragment was amplified from P. pastoris GS115 genomic DNA with degenerate primers (forward, 5′-CAYGGNACNMGNTGYGC-3′; reverse, 5′-GTRTANCCRTCRSARTTRCA-3′). The PCR product was cloned into pGEM-T Easy (Promega, Leiden, The Netherlands) and sequenced to confirm its similarity to the S. cerevisiae KEX2 gene. Inverse PCR (44) was then performed on EcoRI-digested and self-ligated genomic DNA with the Expand Long Template PCR System (Roche, Almere, The Netherlands). Subfragments of the ∼5.4-kb inverse PCR product were sequenced, and the entire genomic fragment was subsequently amplified with the Expand High-Fidelity PCR system (Roche). The PCR product was cloned into pGEM-T Easy (Promega), and both strands were sequenced by primer walking (Eurogentec, Seraing, Belgium).
KEX2 gene disruption.
Plasmid pMTL23-KEX2 was constructed by insertion of an ∼3.9-kb BamHI KEX2 subfragment into the BamHI site of cloning vector pMTL23 (16). The plasmid was cut with Van91I and PinAI, which removed ∼1.7-kb of the KEX2 fragment. An ∼1.2-kb Zeocin resistance cassette of vector pPICZα A (Invitrogen) was amplified with primers that introduce a Van91I site at the 5′ end and a PinAI site at the 3′ end (forward, 5′-CTTCCACAATGTGGCCCACACACCATAGCTTC-3′; reverse, 5′-CTGACCGGTAGCTTGCAAATTAAAGCCTTC-3′). The PCR product was cloned into the cut pMTL23-KEX2 plasmid. For gene replacement, the resulting disruption vector pKEX2Δ was digested with BamHI and the 3.4-kb fragment obtained was used to transform P. pastoris. Transformation was done by electroporation (7) in 0.2-cm cuvettes with a Gene Pulser (Bio-Rad, Veenendaal, The Netherlands) set at 1,500 V, 25 μF, and 200 Ω. The electroporated cells were allowed to recover for 1 h in 1 M sorbitol at 30°C. One volume of YPD medium was added, and the cells were grown for 1 h at 30°C before being plated on YPD medium supplemented with 1 M sorbitol and 100 μg/ml Zeocin (Invitrogen).
Preparation of membrane extracts for the Kex2 assay.
Overnight cultures of P. pastoris were grown in 25 ml of minimal dextrose medium. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4°C for 5 min at 1,500 × g and washed three times with 25 ml of 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0) by repeated resuspension and centrifugation. The final cell pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of the same buffer. Acid-washed 425- to 600-μm glass beads (Sigma) were added to a final volume of ∼1.8 ml, and the cells were lysed at 4°C in a mixer mill (Retsch, Haan, Germany) for 5 min at 30 Hz. The glass beads were allowed to settle, and the supernatant was spun twice for 5 min at 1,500 × g and 4°C to remove any remaining intact cells. The supernatant was centrifuged at 4°C for 2 h at 20,800 × g (rotor k-factor, 377), and then the pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0), 0.5 M NaCl and centrifuged as before. This washing step was repeated with 1 ml of 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0). The resulting membrane pellet was resuspended in 50 μl of 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0), 1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100. The sample was incubated at 4°C for 30 min with gentle agitation and then centrifuged for 2 h at 20,800 × g and 4°C. The protein content of the supernatant was determined with the bicinchoninic acid protein assay (Pierce, Rockford, Ill.) with bovine serum albumin as a standard.
Kex2 assay.
A modification of the procedure of Achstetter and Wolf (1) was used. An aliquot of 50 μg of the detergent-solubilized membrane proteins (see above) was incubated in 200 μl of 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0), 0.1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100, 0.5 mM benzyloxycarbonyl-Tyr-Lys-Arg-p-nitroanilide (Bachem, Weil am Rhein, Germany), and 5 mM calcium chloride. The release of p-nitroaniline at 30°C was monitored for 16 h by measuring the A405 in a Safire microplate spectrophotometer (Tecan, Giessen, The Netherlands). The initial velocity was calculated from the slope of the enzyme progress curve over a period of 2.5 h (16 data points). Enzyme activity was calculated using a molar absorption coefficient at 405 nm of 9,500 M−1 cm−1 for p-nitroaniline (21).
Cloning of P. pastoris YPS1.
An ∼0.4-kb fragment was amplified from P. pastoris GS115 genomic DNA with degenerate primers (forward, 5′-GCAGGCCACCGTTGACTGCTCGCARTAYGGNACNTT-3′; reverse, 5′-GGTATACTTGCTTTGGTCCACTGCTCCRAANARDAT-3′). The PCR product was cloned with the TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen) and sequenced to verify its similarity to the S. cerevisiae YPS1 gene. The GeneRacer system (Invitrogen) was used according to the manufacturer's recommendations to isolate the unknown 5′ and 3′ termini of the transcript by RNA ligase-mediated rapid amplification of cDNA ends (33, 45). Several cloned PCR products were sequenced, and the entire transcript was subsequently amplified by reverse transcription-PCR with the Expand High Fidelity PCR System (Roche). The ∼1.9-kb fragment obtained was cloned with the TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen), and both strands were sequenced by primer walking (BaseClear, Leiden, The Netherlands).
YPS1 gene disruption.
The ∼0.4-kb YPS1 fragment isolated by degenerate PCR was reamplified with primers that introduce a BglII site at the 5′ end and a BamHI site at the 3′ end (forward, 5′-GCGAGATCTGCAGGCCACCGTTGACTG-3′; reverse, 5′-GCAGGATCCGGTATACTTGCTTTGGTCCAC-3′). An ∼2.0-kb fragment containing a blasticidin resistance cassette and an Escherichia coli origin of replication was cut from vector pPIC6 A (Invitrogen) with BglII/BamHI. The PCR product was digested with BglII/BamHI and ligated into the vector fragment. Of the two possible orientations, a clone was chosen in which the fragments were oriented such that it had nonfunctional hybrid BglII/BamHI sites. For insertional gene disruption, the vector pYPS1Δ so obtained was linearized within the YPS1 fragment with NdeI prior to transformation. Transformation of P. pastoris was as described for KEX2 disruption, but selection was with 300 μg/ml blasticidin (Invitrogen).
Yapsin assay.
The yapsin assay is modified from Azaryan et al. (4). Membrane extracts were prepared as described for the Kex2 assay, but 100 mM sodium citrate buffer (pH 4.0) was used in all steps instead of 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0) due to the different pH optima of Kex2 and Yps1. An aliquot of 50 μg of the detergent-solubilized membrane proteins was incubated for 48 h at 30°C in 200 μl of 100 mM sodium citrate buffer (pH 4.0), 0.1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100, 0.5 mM benzyloxycarbonyl-Tyr-Lys-Arg-p-nitroanilide (Bachem), and 5 mM calcium chloride. Subsequent treatment with aminopeptidase M was required to release p-nitroaniline after the initial Yps1 reaction. This treatment is consistent with the reported need for aminopeptidase M treatment with fluorogenic methylcoumarin amide peptides, which are cleaved between the paired basic residues by S. cerevisiae Yps1 (4), possibly due to the steric constraints imposed by peptide substrates. The reaction mixtures were heat-inactivated by boiling for 5 min, after which 30 μl of 1 M Tris-HCl (pH 9.0) was added to raise the pH to 7.5 to enable aminopeptidase M activity. A 200-μl portion of each sample was transferred to a microtiter plate, and the A405 was read in a microplate spectrophotometer (Tecan Safire). The samples were incubated for ∼2 h at 37°C after addition of 20 mU of aminopeptidase M (Roche) until the absorbance remained constant. The increase in absorbance after addition of aminopeptidase M was used as a measure of endopeptidase cleavage during the incubation of the membrane extracts with the chromogenic substrate. Enzyme activity was calculated using a molar absorption coefficient at 405 nm of 9,500 M−1 cm−1 for p-nitroaniline (21).
Fermentation of P. pastoris.
Fed-batch fermentations were performed in 2.5-liter Bioflo 3000 fermenters (New Brunswick Scientific, Nijmegen, The Netherlands), essentially as described by Zhang et al. (49). Minimal basal salts medium was used, and no protease-inhibiting supplements were added. The pH during the glycerol batch phase was kept at 5.0. The pH was allowed to decrease metabolically to 3.0 during the glycerol fed-batch phase and was maintained at this pH during the 3- to 4-day methanol fed-batch phase. A homemade semiconductor gas sensor-controller, similar to that described by Katakura et al. (29), was used to monitor the methanol level in the off-gas and to maintain a constant level of ∼0.2% (wt/vol) methanol in the broth.
Incubation experiments for extracellular precursor processing.
Fresh cells of the kex2 disruptant were obtained from fermentation broth harvested just prior to methanol induction, such that the pH was 3.0 but gelatin was not yet being produced. The cells were pelleted by centrifugation for 5 min at 1,500 × g and 4°C and washed three times with deionized water by repeated resuspension and centrifugation.
Samples of the kex2 yps1 disruptant were harvested at the end of the fermentation. Cell-free supernatant was prepared by centrifugation of the broth for 5 min at 1,500 × g and 4°C, followed by microfiltration of the supernatant using disposable 0.2-μm cellulose acetate syringe filters (Schleicher & Schuell, ’s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands).
A 1:1 ratio was used when kex2 yps1 cell-free supernatant was mixed with kex2 cell-free supernatant or cell-containing broth. When kex2 cells were mixed with kex2 yps1 supernatant, they were resuspended at ∼450 mg (wet weight)/ml to mimic a typical high-cell-density fermentation. The aspartic protease inhibitor pepstatin was optionally added at 10 μM. The mixtures were incubated at 30°C for 8 h and microfiltered to remove cells where applicable.
SDS-PAGE and N-terminal protein sequencing.
The NuPAGE Novex system (Invitrogen) was used for sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), with 10% Bis-Tris gels, morpholineethanesulfonic acid (MES) SDS running buffer and SeeBlue Plus2 prestained molecular mass markers. Gelatin was purified by differential acetone precipitation (46) prior to electrophoresis. Gels were stained with Coomassie SimplyBlue SafeStain (Invitrogen). Blotting of proteins for N-terminal sequencing by Edman degradation was as described previously (46). Protein sequencing was performed by Midwest Analytical (St. Louis, Mo.).
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The nucleotide sequence data for KEX2 and YPS1 have been deposited in the GenBank database under accession no. AY362700 and AY362701, respectively.
RESULTS
Cloning of P. pastoris KEX2 and characterization of the deduced protein sequence.
A putative P. pastoris KEX2 fragment encoding the catalytic domain was isolated by PCR with degenerate primers based on the amino acid sequences from various yeasts, and the entire gene was isolated by inverse PCR.
Among fungal Kex2 homologs, the deduced P. pastoris amino acid sequence is most similar to that of Kluyveromyces lactis (EMBL accession no. CAA30088; 45% identity and 66% similarity) and S. cerevisiae (GenPept accession no. AAA34718; 44% identity and 66% similarity). The first 21 residues of the P. pastoris sequence probably are a signal peptide for translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum. A conserved dibasic site (residues 114 to 115) defines a putative proregion, which in S. cerevisiae is autocatalytically processed in the endoplasmic reticulum (22). A region downstream of the supposed propeptide probably is a subtilisin domain (residues 152 to 445) and contains the highly conserved Asp, His, and Ser subtilisin catalytic triad as well as a conserved Asn residue that stabilizes the oxyanion in the transitional state during hydrolysis of the peptide bond (12). The region downstream of the catalytic domain probably is a proprotein convertase P-domain (residues 466 to 598), which in S. cerevisiae is required for the intramolecular maturation of pro-Kex2 (23). A Ser/Thr-rich domain, probably a target for O-glycosylation, is found C-terminal to this region, followed by a transmembrane domain. The C-terminal cytoplasmic tail contains a conserved Tyr residue (position 716) that, together with contextual sequences, constitutes a trans-Golgi network localization signal in S. cerevisiae (48).
Cloning of P. pastoris YPS1 and characterization of the deduced protein sequence.
Degenerate primers were designed on the basis of a yapsin-like gene fragment from Pichia angusta (EMBL accession no. AL433341) and conserved amino acid stretches of S. cerevisiae Yps1, Yps2, and Yps3 (RefSeq accession no. NP_013221, NP_010428, and NP_013222, respectively). Reverse transcription-PCR with these primers followed by rapid amplification of cDNA ends resulted in the isolation of a putative P. pastoris yapsin.
Comparison of the deduced amino acid sequence with the S. cerevisiae yapsins showed that it was most similar to Yps1 (41% identity and 65% similarity). The first 23 residues probably are a secretory signal. A dibasic propeptide processing site, which is presumably cleaved autocatalytically in S. cerevisiae (14), is conserved in the P. pastoris sequence (residues 70 to 71). The location of the two active site Asp residues (residues 104 and 384) and their specific sequence context match those of S. cerevisiae Yps1 (3). Two Cys residues are also conserved (residues 120 and 202). In S. cerevisiae Yps1, these residues flank an exposed loop region, which is proteolytically cleaved into α- and β-subunits that are linked by a disulfide bridge (14). The inferred loop region in the P. pastoris sequence contains a stretch of Gly-Ser repeats that may confer conformational flexibility. The C-terminal part of the sequence contains a Ser/Thr-rich region (residues 545 to 569) that may be O-glycosylated, a hydrophobic tail (residues 579 to 599), and a putative glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) modification signal (19). Most GPI-anchored plasma membrane proteins, including S. cerevisiae Yps1, have a pair of basic amino acids just prior to the GPI attachment site (24). The putative GPI attachment site of P. pastoris Yps1 (residue 574) is immediately preceded by a triplet of acidic residues. The significance of this atypical sequence context is unclear.
Disruption of the KEX2 and YPS1 genes.
The KEX2 and YPS1 genes were disrupted individually and in combination in the present study, using a previously described P. pastoris strain that produces Col1a1-2 gelatin (46) and which is hereafter referred to as the wild type. The part of the KEX2 locus encoding the catalytic and P domains was replaced with the Zeocin resistance cassette of plasmid pKEX2Δ (Fig. 1A). The YPS1 gene was disrupted by insertion of the blasticidin-selectable plasmid pYPS1Δ in the region that encodes the catalytic β-subunit (Fig. 1B), N-terminal to the subunit's catalytic Asp residue. Correct disruption of the KEX2 and YPS1 genes was verified by PCR (not shown) and Southern blotting (Fig. 1C and D).
FIG. 1.
KEX2 and YPS1 gene disruption. (A) Schematic representation of the P. pastoris KEX2 locus and its disruption. Abbreviations: ORF, unrelated flanking open reading frame; S, signal peptide; pro, propeptide; cat, catalytic domain; P, P domain; M, membrane-spanning domain; T, trans-Golgi network localization signal; Zeo, Zeocin resistance cassette of pPICZα A (Invitrogen). The three parts of the scheme represent the KEX2 locus (1), plasmid pKEX2Δ digested with BamHI (2), and the disrupted KEX2 locus (3). The black bar indicates the region used as a probe for Southern blotting. (B) Disruption of P. pastoris YPS1. Abbreviations: S, signal peptide; pro, propeptide; α, α-subunit; L, loop region; β, β-subunit (strikethrough indicates disruption); M, membrane anchoring GPI domain; bla, blasticidin resistance cassette of pPIC6 A (Invitrogen); ori, E. coli origin of replication of pPIC6 A. The three parts of the scheme represent the YPS1 locus (1), plasmid pYPS1Δ digested with NdeI (2), and the disrupted YPS1 locus (3). The black bar represents the probe used for Southern blotting. (C) Verification of KEX2 disruption by Southern blotting. Genomic DNA digested with EcoRI/StuI was hybridized with the KEX2 probe indicated in panel A. Lanes: 1, wild type; 2, kex2; 3, yps1; 4, kex2 yps1. The hybridization pattern was as expected (5.4 kb for the wild type and the yps1 disruptant and 2.9 and 2.0 kb for the kex2 disrupted strains). (D) Verification of YPS1 disruption by Southern blotting. Genomic DNA digested with BamHI was hybridized with the YPS1 probe indicated in panel B. The lanes correspond to the same strains as in panel C. The hybridization pattern was as expected (2.0 kb for the wild type and the kex2 disruptant and 4.4 kb for the yps1 disruptants).
To demonstrate functional disruption of the KEX2 and YPS1 genes, the corresponding enzyme activities of all three disruptants and the wild type were assayed (Table 1). Kex2 activity was negligible in the kex2 and kex2 yps1 disruptants compared to the wild type and the yps1 disruptant. A control reaction consisting of a wild-type sample and the chelator EGTA instead of the Ca2+ cofactor had minimal Kex2 activity, which attests to the specificity of the assay. Yapsin activity was greatly reduced in the yps1 and kex2 yps1 disruptants, demonstrating functional disruption of the YPS1 gene. A wild-type control reaction performed in the presence of the aspartic protease inhibitor pepstatin appropriately showed little yapsin activity. For unknown reasons, the yapsin activity in the kex2 single disruptant was increased by 95% relative to the wild type.
TABLE 1.
Kex2 and yapsin activities of wild-type and disruptant strainsa
Strain | Relative activity (%) of:
|
|
---|---|---|
Kex2 | Yapsin | |
Wild type | 100 ± 2 | 100 ± 1 |
kex2 | 1 ± 1 | 200 ± 4 |
yps1 | 96 ± 0.4 | 5 ± 3 |
kex2 yps1 | 1.0 ± 0.5 | 11 ± 3 |
Wild typeb | 2.4 ± 0.4 | 6 ± 4 |
Values are means ± standard deviations (n = 3) and are expressed as percentages of the mean wild-type activities (1.7 and 0.037 nmol/min per mg of solubilized membrane protein for the Kex2 and yapsin assays, respectively).
Control reactions in which the Kex2 assay contained the chelator EGTA instead of the Ca2+ cofactor and in which the yapsin assay contained the aspartic protease inhibitor pepstatin. The accessory aminopeptidase M used in the yapsin assay was basically unaffected by pepstatin (not shown).
Phenotype of protease disruptants.
A number of phenotypic defects have been described for kex2 mutants of different yeast species (5, 17, 20, 30). We did not observe obvious aberrant morphologies of cells grown in YPD, nor did we notice any growth arrest at 16°C as reported for S. cerevisiae (30). The generation time of P. pastoris kex2 and kex2 yps1 disruptants grown in YPD medium at 30°C was increased by ∼50% relative to the wild type (data not shown). The morphology and growth rate of the yps1 disruptant in YPD were indistinguishable from the wild type. In practical terms, all strains had good viability and were amenable to high-cell-density fermentation (∼350 to 550 g [wet weight]/liter).
Gelatin production in protease disruptants.
Use of the kex2 disruptant for the production of Col1a1-2 prevented the predominant proteolysis that occurs in the wild-type strain. While major fragments resulting from cleavage at Met-Gly-Pro-Arg are seen in the wild type (Fig. 2, lane 1, bands 4 to 6), these fragments were absent in the kex2 disruptant (Fig. 2, lane 3). This shows that Kex2 is responsible for the cleavage observed in the wild type. The banding pattern of the remaining minor degradation products in the kex2 disruptant was very similar to that of the mutated Col1a1-2* gelatin produced in the wild type (46), which lacks the proteolyzed Met-Gly-Pro-Arg sites (Fig. 2, lane 2). This result indicates that Kex2 is not an important contributor to the formation of these minor fragments.
FIG. 2.
SDS-PAGE of gelatin produced in wild-type and disruptant strains. Lanes correspond to gelatin type and strain, respectively, as follows: lane 1, Col1a1-2/wild type (46); lane 2, Col1a1-2*/wild type (46); lane 3, Col1a1-2/kex2; lane 4, Col1a1-2/yps1; lane 5, Col1a1-2/kex2 yps1; lane 6, endoglycosidase H-treated Col1a1-2/kex2 yps1. Lane M, molecular mass marker. Arrows indicate protein bands referred to in the text. Gelatin was purified from the clarified broth by differential acetone precipitation (46). The equivalent of 5 μl of clarified broth was loaded for all samples, except for lanes 5 and 6, in which the equivalent of 15 μl was loaded for approximate normalization. Note that gelatins migrate in SDS-PAGE at an apparent molecular mass ∼40% higher than the true molecular mass (46).
Col1a1-2 produced by the yps1 disruptant (Fig. 2, lane 4) had a banding pattern virtually identical to that of the wild type (Fig. 2, lane 1). Except for two diffuse bands (bands 1 and 2) just over the full-length band (band 3), gelatin produced in the kex2 yps1 double disruptant (Fig. 2, lane 5) was similar to that produced in the kex2-disrupted strain (Fig. 2, lane 3). Disruption of the YPS1 gene apparently has no significant effect on the integrity of Col1a1-2.
Characterization of α-factor leader processing.
The major Col1a1-2 band produced by the kex2 disruptant (Fig. 2, lane 3, band 3) migrated at the same position as that of Col1a1-2* produced by the wild type (Fig. 2, lane 2, band 3). As the α-factor propeptide of the latter is correctly processed (46) and unprocessed precursors would have had a visibly higher molecular mass in SDS-PAGE, some form of α-factor leader processing must have occurred with the gelatin produced by the kex2 disruptant. The N-terminal sequence of the major Col1a1-2 band from the kex2 disruptant (Fig. 2, lane 3, band 3) was Glu-Ala-Glu-Ala-Pro. This corresponds to the sequence immediately C-terminal to the dibasic site in the α-factor propeptide/Col1a1-2 fusion and indeed reveals accurate Kex2-like processing of the propeptide. The sequence also reveals a lack of processing of the α-factor-derived (Glu-Ala)2 spacer by the late Golgi protease dipeptidyl aminopeptidase A (DPAPase A) (26).
The N-terminal sequence of the full-length band obtained with the yps1 disruptant (Fig. 2, lane 4, band 3) was Glu-Ala-Pro-Met-Gly, which is identical to the sequences previously reported for the full-length bands of Col1a1-2 and Col1a1-2* produced in the wild type (46). The sequence reveals correct cleavage at the dibasic site of the α-factor propeptide and partial DPAPase A processing of the (Glu-Ala)2 spacer (i.e., removal of one of the two Glu-Ala repeats).
The two diffuse bands appearing in the kex2 yps1 double disruptant (Fig. 2, lane 5, bands 1 and 2) disappeared following treatment of the protein with endoglycosidase H (Fig. 2, lane 6). As Col1a1-2 produced in the wild type is not glycosylated (not shown), the effect of endoglycosidase H probably reflects the removal of oligosaccharides from small remnants of the α-factor propeptide, which is known to be glycosylated. N-terminal sequencing of the main and the diffuse (glycosylated) bands from the kex2 yps1 disruptant (Fig. 2, lane 5, bands 1 to 3) confirmed the presence of such remnants. The following sequences internal to the α-factor propeptide were found: band 1, Asp-Val-Ala-Val-Leu and Val-Ala-Val-Leu-Pro; band 2, Phe-Ile-Xaa-Thr-Thr; band 3, Glu-Glu-Gly-Val-Ser and Glu-Lys-Arg-Glu-Ala. Apparently, α-factor propeptide cleavage at the dibasic site does not occur in the kex2 yps1 double disruptant, and the aberrant precursor maturation seen is probably caused by other proteases. This shows that Yps1 mediated the α-factor propeptide cleavage at the dibasic site observed in the kex2 single disruptant.
Extracellular precursor processing.
Yps1 activity in S. cerevisiae is detectable at the cell surface (31) and in the extracellular medium (2, 28), so extracellular Kex2-independent precursor processing in fermentations of P. pastoris was evaluated (Fig. 3) by mixing cell-free supernatant of the kex2 yps1 double disruptant (containing incompletely processed gelatin precursors) with either washed kex2 cells or cell-free kex2 supernatant (harvested prior to induction of gelatin expression). The gelatin precursors produced by the kex2 yps1 double disruptant appeared to be processed when incubated with washed kex2 cells (Fig. 3, lane 2) and when incubated with cell-free kex2 supernatant (Fig. 3, lane 3) but not in control incubations. The control incubations contained either kex2 yps1 cell-containing broth alone (Fig. 3, lane 1) or a mixture of cell-free kex2 yps1 supernatant with cell-containing kex2 fermentation broth in the presence of the aspartic protease inhibitor pepstatin (Fig. 3, lane 4).
FIG. 3.
SDS-PAGE of extracellular precursor processing. Lanes correspond to the following incubations: lane 1, kex2 yps1 cell-containing broth; lane 2, cell-free kex2 yps1 supernatant mixed with kex2 cells; lane 3, cell-free kex2 yps1 supernatant mixed with kex2 cell-free supernatant; lane 4, cell-free kex2 yps1 supernatant mixed with kex2 cell-containing broth in the presence of pepstatin. Lane M, molecular mass marker. Protein bands are indicated as follows: arrows 1 and 2, Col1a1-2 precursors; arrow 3, mature Col1a1-2. Gelatin was purified by differential acetone precipitation (46). The equivalent of 15 μl of kex2 yps1 fermentation supernatant was loaded in each lane.
DISCUSSION
We cloned P. pastoris homologs of the S. cerevisiae Kex2 and Yps1 basic residue-specific endoproteases. Both deduced protein sequences were highly similar to the S. cerevisiae prototypes and contained all of the expected functional domains. Disruption of the putative P. pastoris KEX2 and YPS1 genes caused loss of most activity in corresponding enzyme assays, which confirms the identity of the genes. The near lack of yapsin activity in the yps1 disruptant also suggests that Yps1 represents the major yapsin in P. pastoris, at least under the conditions used. The measured yapsin activity of the kex2 disruptant was ∼95% higher than that of the wild-type strain. Yps1 is clearly the major contributor to this increased activity, given the low activity of the kex2 yps1 disruptant. Accordingly, a preliminary assay showed that ∼90% of the activity in the kex2 disruptant was inhibited by the aspartic protease inhibitor pepstatin. We do not know whether the increased yapsin activity in the kex2 disruptant is the result of a regulated, compensatory response to the lack of Kex2 activity.
Production of Col1a1-2 gelatin in the kex2 disruptant prevented the prominent cleavage normally observed at the Met-Gly-Pro-Arg motifs, which confirms our prior hypothesis that Kex2 was responsible for this monobasic cleavage (46). The banding pattern of low-level degradation products in the kex2 strain was not significantly different from that in the wild type. We previously suggested that these minor fragments might have originated from limited cleavage by Kex2 at Arg residues within a suboptimal sequence context because a tailored gelatin with no Arg residues at all was secreted completely intact (47) and because even the relatively discriminative S2 and S4 subsites (Schechter and Berger [42] nomenclature) of S. cerevisiae Kex2 have some leeway in the substrate residues that they can accommodate (8, 43). Apparently, however, few sites in Col1a1-2 other than Met-Gly-Pro-Arg meet the Kex2 protease's overall substrate requirements, as most of the minor bands were also present in the kex2 disruptant.
The integrity of Col1a1-2 produced by the yps1 disruptant was no better than that of gelatin produced by the wild type. The degradation seen in the kex2 yps1 double disruptant was similar to that in the kex2 disruptant. Thus, Yps1 does not seem to be an important contributor to the degradation of Col1a1-2. Yps1 was involved in the Kex2-independent processing of the α-factor propeptide, as the Col1a1-2 precursor was properly processed in a kex2 disruptant but not in the kex2 yps1 double disruptant. Col1a1-2 is secreted at 2 to 3 g/liter in wild-type P. pastoris (46), and the productivity of the kex2 disruptant as judged by SDS-PAGE is similar (Fig. 2). It was unexpected that a P. pastoris kex2 disruptant can completely mature gelatin secreted at such high levels, since the S. cerevisiae KEX2 gene was first isolated by complementation of kex2 mutants that were sterile due to their inability to produce mature α-factor (27). Furthermore, maturation of α-factor/somatostatin precursors did not occur in a kex2 mutant of S. cerevisiae (9). Through the use of a sensitive halo assay, Egel-Mitani et al. (18) demonstrated production of mature α-factor by an S. cerevisiae kex2 mutant when either Yps1 or the prepropheromone itself was overexpressed. This result suggests that only a portion of the α-factor molecules were processed in this mutant, which is consistent with the partial processing reported for an α-factor/insulin hybrid in S. cerevisiae (18). In comparison, the precursor processing observed during the fermentation of the P. pastoris kex2 disruptant appears rather efficient.
While Kex2 is thought to recognize only the region N-terminal to the cleaved bond (9, 40), S. cerevisiae Yps1 is predicted to interact with at least three residues on the C-terminal side (37). The particular protein fused to the α-factor propeptide may therefore influence precursor processing, and we cannot formally exclude the possibility that the Col1a1-2 precursor is more efficiently processed than other α-factor propeptide fusions. However, the Col1a1-2 precursor is not expected to be a uniquely well-suited substrate for Yps1, as it lacks the basic amino acids that Yps1 is proposed to favor among the first three (37) or six (13) residues C-terminal to the cleavage site.
S. cerevisiae Yps1 is localized to the extracellular side of the plasma membrane via its GPI anchor. It may play a role in the proteolytic activation of secreted enzymes or the shedding of membrane receptors (2). Before reaching the periplasm, Yps1 may be transiently active during its passage through the late secretory pathway (2, 14). This hypothesis is supported by the secretion of biologically active α-factor by an S. cerevisiae kex2 mutant (18) because the pheromone is active only when its N-terminal Glu-Ala repeats are removed by the trans-Golgi protease DPAPase A (26), following cleavage at Lys-Arg. In wild-type P. pastoris, only one of the two Glu-Ala repeats of Col1a1-2 was processed (46), probably due to steric hindrance by the adjacent Pro residue. In the kex2 disruptant, however, neither of the two Glu-Ala repeats was processed by DPAPase A. The high level of gelatin secreted may have exceeded the capacity of any transient Yps1, and the prerequisite dibasic cleavage of the α-factor propeptide might not have occurred until the gelatin was beyond the Golgi and its DPAPase A.
Yapsin activity is detectable at the cell surface of S. cerevisiae (31) and Yps1 is also present in the extracellular medium (2, 28). The release of GPI-anchored Yps1 from the cell may be due to specific phospholipases (2). In high-cell-density fermentations, at least some of the Yps1 released probably is due to cell lysis. To determine whether P. pastoris Yps1 can process the α-factor leader in the fermentation broth, cell-free supernatant of the kex2 yps1 disruptant was incubated with washed kex2 cells or with cell-free kex2 supernatant. In both cases, the precursor forms produced by the kex2 yps1 double disruptant are processed, suggesting the presence of both cell surface-associated and free Yps1 activity. Be it cell associated or free, Yps1 activity is present in the fermentation broth at pH 3.0. Extracellular Yps1 probably is generally active in P. pastoris fermentations, as the pH range of 3.0 to 5.0 common for P. pastoris fermentations approximates the active pH range for S. cerevisiae Yps1 (4). Yps1 activity in the broth may contribute to the efficient α-factor propeptide processing observed in the kex2 disruptant, although the precursor molecules could already have been processed by Yps1 in the periplasmic space.
The S. cerevisiae Kex2 and Yps1 proteases have overlapping but distinct substrate specificities (10). For example, the S1 subsite of Kex2 is highly specific for Arg (39, 41), while Yps1 is also active toward substrates with Lys at the corresponding position (4, 13). In the case of Col1a1-2 production in P. pastoris, the Met-Gly-Pro-Arg motif was recognized only by Kex2, but the α-factor propeptide could be cleaved by both Kex2 and Yps1. The α-factor processing ability of both proteases, together with their divergent sequence specificities, suggests that kex2 and yps1 single-gene disruptants of P. pastoris should be evaluated for the expression of heterologous proteins that undergo degradation at basic sites. Whether cleavage of the propeptide by either protease actually occurs probably depends on the particular protein it is fused to, as bulky proteins may result in steric interference. Since the Glu-Ala repeats were not removed from Col1a1-2 in the kex2 disruptant, this often redundant spacer may need to be omitted from gene constructs with this strain if the native N terminus of the foreign protein is required. In light of the many reports of proteolytic degradation at basic residues in yeasts, kex2 and yps1 disruptants of P. pastoris may be very useful for the production of secreted proteins in this powerful expression system.
Acknowledgments
We thank Jeroen Bastiaans, Patrick Janssen, Chantal Quik, and Valentina Tremaroli for technical assistance.
REFERENCES
- 1.Achstetter, T., and D. H. Wolf. 1985. Hormone processing and membrane-bound proteinases in yeast. EMBO J. 4:173-177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ash, J., M. Dominguez, J. J. Bergeron, D. Y. Thomas, and Y. Bourbonnais. 1995. The yeast proprotein convertase encoded by YAP3 is a glycophosphatidylinositol-anchored protein that localizes to the plasma membrane. J. Biol. Chem. 270:20847-20854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Azaryan, A. V., T. C. Friedman, N. X. Cawley, and Y. P. Loh. 1995. Characteristics of YAP3, a new prohormone processing aspartic protease from S. cerevisiae. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 362:569-572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Azaryan, A. V., M. Wong, T. C. Friedman, N. X. Cawley, F. E. Estivariz, H. C. Chen, and Y. P. Loh. 1993. Purification and characterization of a paired basic residue-specific yeast aspartic protease encoded by the YAP3 gene. Similarity to the mammalian pro-opiomelanocortin-converting enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 268:11968-11975. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bader, O., M. Schaller, S. Klein, J. Kukula, K. Haack, F. Muhlschlegel, H. C. Korting, W. Schafer, and B. Hube. 2001. The KEX2 gene of Candida glabrata is required for cell surface integrity. Mol. Microbiol. 41:1431-1444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bateman, A., E. Birney, L. Cerruti, R. Durbin, L. Etwiller, S. R. Eddy, S. Griffiths-Jones, K. L. Howe, M. Marshall, and E. L. Sonnhammer. 2002. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic. Acids Res. 30:276-280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Becker, D. M., and L. Guarente. 1991. High-efficiency transformation of yeast by electroporation. Methods Enzymol. 194:182-187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bevan, A., C. Brenner, and R. S. Fuller. 1998. Quantitative assessment of enzyme specificity in vivo: P2 recognition by Kex2 protease defined in a genetic system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:10384-10389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bourbonnais, Y., D. Bolin, and D. Shields. 1988. Secretion of somatostatin by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Correct proteolytic processing of pro-α-factor-somatostatin hybrids requires the products of the KEX2 and STE13 genes. J. Biol. Chem. 263:15342-15347. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bourbonnais, Y., D. Germain, J. Ash, and D. Y. Thomas. 1994. Cleavage of prosomatostatins by the yeast Yap3 and Kex2 endoprotease. Biochimie 76:226-233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Brake, A. J. 1990. α-factor leader-directed secretion of heterologous proteins from yeast. Methods Enzymol. 185:408-421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Brenner, C., A. Bevan, and R. S. Fuller. 1993. One-step site-directed mutagenesis of the Kex2 protease oxyanion hole. Curr. Biol. 3:498-506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cawley, N. X., H. C. Chen, M. C. Beinfeld, and Y. P. Loh. 1996. Specificity and kinetic studies on the cleavage of various prohormone mono- and paired-basic residue sites by yeast aspartic protease 3. J. Biol. Chem. 271:4168-4176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cawley, N. X., V. Olsen, C. F. Zhang, H. C. Chen, M. Tan, and Y. P. Loh. 1998. Activation and processing of non-anchored yapsin 1 (Yap3p). J. Biol. Chem. 273:584-591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cereghino, G. P., J. L. Cereghino, C. Ilgen, and J. M. Cregg. 2002. Production of recombinant proteins in fermenter cultures of the yeast Pichia pastoris. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 13:329-332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chambers, S. P., S. E. Prior, D. A. Barstow, and N. P. Minton. 1988. The pMTL nic− cloning vectors. I. Improved pUC polylinker regions to facilitate the use of sonicated DNA for nucleotide sequencing. Gene 68:139-149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Davey, J., K. Davis, Y. Imai, M. Yamamoto, and G. Matthews. 1994. Isolation and characterization of krp, a dibasic endopeptidase required for cell viability in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. EMBO J. 13:5910-5921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Egel-Mitani, M., H. P. Flygenring, and M. T. Hansen. 1990. A novel aspartyl protease allowing KEX2-independent MFα propheromone processing in yeast. Yeast 6:127-137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Eisenhaber, B., G. Schneider, M. Wildpaner, and F. Eisenhaber. 2004. A sensitive predictor for potential GPI lipid modification sites in fungal protein sequences and its application to genome-wide studies for Aspergillus nidulans, Candida albicans, Neurospora crassa, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Mol. Biol. 337:243-253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Enderlin, C. S., and D. M. Ogrydziak. 1994. Cloning, nucleotide sequence and functions of XPR6, which codes for a dibasic processing endoprotease from the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Yeast 10:67-79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Erlanger, B. F., N. Kokowsky, and W. Cohen. 1961. The preparation and properties of two new chromogenic substrates for trypsin. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 95:271-278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Germain, D., F. Dumas, T. Vernet, Y. Bourbonnais, D. Y. Thomas, and G. Boileau. 1992. The pro-region of the Kex2 endoprotease of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is removed by self-processing. FEBS Lett. 299:283-286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gluschankof, P., and R. S. Fuller. 1994. A C-terminal domain conserved in precursor processing proteases is required for intramolecular N-terminal maturation of pro-Kex2 protease. EMBO J. 13:2280-2288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hamada, K., H. Terashima, M. Arisawa, N. Yabuki, and K. Kitada. 1999. Amino acid residues in the ω-minus region participate in cellular localization of yeast glycosylphosphatidylinositol-attached proteins. J. Bacteriol. 181:3886-3889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hirokawa, T., S. Boon-Chieng, and S. Mitaku. 1998. SOSUI: classification and secondary structure prediction system for membrane proteins. Bioinformatics 14:378-379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Julius, D., L. Blair, A. Brake, G. Sprague, and J. Thorner. 1983. Yeast α factor is processed from a larger precursor polypeptide: the essential role of a membrane-bound dipeptidyl aminopeptidase. Cell 32:839-852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Julius, D., A. Brake, L. Blair, R. Kunisawa, and J. Thorner. 1984. Isolation of the putative structural gene for the lysine-arginine-cleaving endopeptidase required for processing of yeast prepro-α-factor. Cell 37:1075-1089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kang, H. A., S. J. Kim, E. S. Choi, S. K. Rhee, and B. H. Chung. 1998. Efficient production of intact human parathyroid hormone in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant deficient in yeast aspartic protease 3 (YAP3). Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 50:187-192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Katakura, Y., W. Zhang, G. Zhuang, T. Omasa, M. Kishimoto, Y. Goto, and K. Suga. 1998. Effect of methanol concentration on the production of human β2-glycoprotein I domain V by a recombinant Pichia pastoris: a simple system for the control of methanol concentration using a semiconductor gas sensor. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 86:482-487. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Komano, H., and R. S. Fuller. 1995. Shared functions in vivo of a glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol-linked aspartyl protease, Mkc7, and the proprotein processing protease Kex2 in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:10752-10756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Komano, H., M. Seeger, S. Gandy, G. T. Wang, G. A. Krafft, and R. S. Fuller. 1998. Involvement of cell surface glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol-linked aspartyl proteases in α-secretase-type cleavage and ectodomain solubilization of human Alzheimer β-amyloid precursor protein in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 273:31648-31651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Li, S. W., J. Khillan, and D. J. Prockop. 1995. The complete cDNA coding sequence for the mouse proα1(I) chain of type I procollagen. Matrix Biol. 14:593-595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Maruyama, K., and S. Sugano. 1994. Oligo-capping: a simple method to replace the cap structure of eukaryotic mRNAs with oligoribonucleotides. Gene 138:171-174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nielsen, H., J. Engelbrecht, S. Brunak, and G. von Heijne. 1997. Identification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic signal peptides and prediction of their cleavage sites. Protein Eng. 10:1-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Olsen, D., C. Yang, M. Bodo, R. Chang, S. Leigh, J. Baez, D. Carmichael, M. Perala, E. R. Hamalainen, M. Jarvinen, and J. Polarek. 2003. Recombinant collagen and gelatin for drug delivery. Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 55:1547-1567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Olsen, V., N. X. Cawley, J. Brandt, M. Egel-Mitani, and Y. P. Loh. 1999. Identification and characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yapsin 3, a new member of the yapsin family of aspartic proteases encoded by the YPS3 gene. Biochem. J. 339:407-411. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Olsen, V., K. Guruprasad, N. X. Cawley, H. C. Chen, T. L. Blundell, and Y. P. Loh. 1998. Cleavage efficiency of the novel aspartic protease yapsin 1 (Yap3p) enhanced for substrates with arginine residues flanking the P1 site: correlation with electronegative active-site pockets predicted by molecular modeling. Biochemistry 37:2768-2777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rice, P., I. Longden, and A. Bleasby. 2000. EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet. 16:276-277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rockwell, N. C., and R. S. Fuller. 1998. Interplay between S1 and S4 subsites in Kex2 protease: Kex2 exhibits dual specificity for the P4 side chain. Biochemistry 37:3386-3391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rockwell, N. C., D. J. Krysan, T. Komiyama, and R. S. Fuller. 2002. Precursor processing by kex2/furin proteases. Chem. Rev. 102:4525-4548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Rockwell, N. C., and J. W. Thorner. 2004. The kindest cuts of all: crystal structures of Kex2 and furin reveal secrets of precursor processing. Trends Biochem. Sci. 29:80-87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Schechter, I., and A. Berger. 1967. On the size of the active site in proteases. I. Papain. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 27:157-162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Suzuki, Y., N. Ikeda, E. Kataoka, and K. Ohsuye. 2000. Effect of amino acid substitution at the P3 and P4 subsites of fusion proteins on kex2 protease activity. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 32:53-60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Triglia, T., M. G. Peterson, and D. J. Kemp. 1988. A procedure for in vitro amplification of DNA segments that lie outside the boundaries of known sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 16:8186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Volloch, V., B. Schweitzer, and S. Rits. 1994. Ligation-mediated amplification of RNA from murine erythroid cells reveals a novel class of β globin mRNA with an extended 5′-untranslated region. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:2507-2511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Werten, M. W. T., T. J. van den Bosch, R. D. Wind, H. Mooibroek, and F. A. de Wolf. 1999. High-yield secretion of recombinant gelatins by Pichia pastoris. Yeast 15:1087-1096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Werten, M. W. T., W. H. Wisselink, T. J. Jansen-van den Bosch, E. C. de Bruin, and F. A. de Wolf. 2001. Secreted production of a custom-designed, highly hydrophilic gelatin in Pichia pastoris. Protein Eng. 14:447-454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wilcox, C. A., K. Redding, R. Wright, and R. S. Fuller. 1992. Mutation of a tyrosine localization signal in the cytosolic tail of yeast Kex2 protease disrupts Golgi retention and results in default transport to the vacuole. Mol. Biol. Cell 3:1353-1371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zhang, W., M. A. Bevins, B. A. Plantz, L. A. Smith, and M. M. Meagher. 2000. Modeling Pichia pastoris growth on methanol and optimizing the production of a recombinant protein, the heavy-chain fragment C of botulinum neurotoxin, serotype A. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 70:1-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]