Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2001 Jan 7;268(1462):71–76. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1331

Indirect fitness consequences of mate choice in sticklebacks: offspring of brighter males grow slowly but resist parasitic infections.

I Barber 1, S A Arnott 1, V A Braithwaite 1, J Andrew 1, F A Huntingford 1
PMCID: PMC1087602  PMID: 12123300

Abstract

'Good genes' models of sexual selection suggest that elaborate male sexual ornaments have evolved as reliable signals of male quality because only males of high genetic viability are able to develop and maintain them. Females benefit from choosing such individuals if quality is heritable. A key prediction is that the offspring of males with elaborate mating displays will perform better than those of less elaborate males, but it has proved difficult to demonstrate such an effect independently of the effects of differences in parental investment. We tested for 'good genes' linked to male ornamentation in the three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus using in vitro fertilization to generate maternal half-siblings, which were raised without parental care. Maternal half-siblings sired by brightly coloured males grew less quickly than half-siblings sired by dull males but were more resistant to a controlled disease challenge. Among the offspring that became infected, those with brighter fathers had higher white blood cell counts. This suggests that highly ornamented males confer disease resistance on their offspring. The association with reduced growth suggests a mechanism for the maintenance of heritable variation in both disease resistance and male sexual coloration.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (137.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Braithwaite VA, Odling-Smee L. The paradox of the stickleback: different yet the same. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Dec;14(12):460–461. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01719-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buchanan KL, Catchpole CK, Lewis JW, Lodge A. Song as an indicator of parasitism in the sedge warbler. Anim Behav. 1999 Feb;57(2):307–314. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kraak SBM, Bakker TCM. Mutual mate choice in sticklebacks: attractive males choose big females, which lay big eggs. Anim Behav. 1998 Oct;56(4):859–866. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kurtz J, Sauer KP. The immunocompetence handicap hypothesis: testing the genetic predictions. Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Dec 22;266(1437):2515–2522. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  6. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  7. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rolff J. Parasitism increases offspring size in a damselfly: experimental evidence for parasite-mediated maternal effects. Anim Behav. 1999 Nov;58(5):1105–1108. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Saino N, Stradi R, Ninni P, Pini E, Møller AP. Carotenoid Plasma Concentration, Immune Profile, and Plumage Ornamentation of Male Barn Swallows (Hirundo rustica). Am Nat. 1999 Oct;154(4):441–448. doi: 10.1086/303246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Verhulst S., Dieleman S. J., Parmentier H. K. A tradeoff between immunocompetence and sexual ornamentation in domestic fowl. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Apr 13;96(8):4478–4481. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES