In the published article, there was an error in Figure 4 as published. “Electrical impedance myography” was repeated by mistake the square furthest to the right in the second row from the top. This box should have instead read “Subjective evaluation”. The corrected Figure 4 and its caption appear below.
Figure 4.
The grading of the identified muscle function assessment methods made by experts in biomechanics (x-axis) and clinical experts (y-axis) in relation to dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease. The most optimal techniques are placed closer to the upper right corner, and the least optimal closest to the lower left corner.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.