Abstract
On the basis of steric hindrance, one carbonyl group in a diketone can be reduced in a regioselective manner, with high enantioselectivity. The methodology can be extended to ketones with varied length of hydrocarbon chain spacing, and the products can be converted by oxidation to hydroxy esters or lactones without loss of enantiopurity.
The asymmetric transfer hydrogenation (ATH) of ketones using ruthenium-based catalysts such as 1 and its tethered variants such as 2 or 3 (Figure 1A) has been widely applied in synthetic chemistry.1 Acetophenone and its derivatives are known to be excellent substrates and give reduction products for which the major product enantiomer arises through the transition state model illustrated in Figure 1B.1−3 Several classes of ketone have been shown to be highly compatible with ATH reduction using Ru-based catalysts such as 1–3.4,5
Figure 1.
(A) Examples of Ru-based ATH catalysts, (B) mode of hydrogen transfer, (C–E) known precedents, (F) work reported here. In all cases, the descriptor ‘(R,R)-’ refers to the configuration of the ligand in the complex.
Ikariya et al.4a,4b reported the first ATH of 1,2-diketones using catalyst 1, in a reaction which generated 1,2-diols in >99% ee and 98.6:1/4 dr. Reductions of symmetrical and unsymmetrical diketones were reported. In later examples, an extended series of diketones were reduced by ATH,4c and other Ru-based ATH catalysts have been successfully applied (Figure 1C).4d,4e Although in the majority of diketone reductions, both ketones are reduced, sometimes just one ketone can be reduced (Figure 1D, 1E).5 In an important precedent,5b an unsymmetrical diketone was reduced, under carefully controlled reaction conditions, to a 3-hydroxy ketone (Figure 1D). In this case the reactive ketone was adjacent to a trifluoromethyl group. Catalyst 1 was applied to the successful reduction of just one ketone of a diketone in high ee, on the basis of differing levels of steric hindrance.5a In other cases of selective keto reduction,5b,5e a substituted carbon atom is generally found between the carbonyl groups (Figure 1E). Herein we report a systematic study of substrates containing two ketones in which one is resistant to ATH due to a high level of steric hindrance from an adjacent aromatic ring. The less hindered ketone is reduced in high enantioselectivity, creating hydroxyketone products with a unique structure and which may form the basis for the synthesis of unusual target molecules.
We first aimed to establish which aromatic groups might present sufficient steric hindrance to prevent the ATH of an adjacent ketone. There are examples of ketones which are resistant to ATH due to steric hindrance;6 however, we initially tested ketones 4–7 using catalyst (R,R)-2 in formic acid/triethylamine 5:2 azeotrope (FA:TEA) and DCM at rt (Figure 2), which represents a catalyst/reductant system adopted for ATH reactions.2 The diortho-hydroxy ketone 4 was completely converted to the corresponding alcohol with 73% ee in 24 h (R configuration tentatively assigned by analogy with acetophenone).
Figure 2.
ATH and attempted ATH of ketones 4–7 using catalyst (R,R)-2 in FA:TEA (5:2 azeotrope)/DCM at rt.
In contrast, the attempted ATH of ketone 5, synthesized via O,O′-dimethylation of 4, yielded no alcohol even after 7 days. In the ATH of a 1:1 mixture of ketone 5 and acetophenone under the same conditions, only acetophenone was reduced, thus ruling out catalyst inhibition by 5 and confirming that it was likely too hindered for reduction. Ketones 6 and 7, prepared by acetylation of the penta- and tetramethylbenzene respectively, also provide resistance to ATH under the same conditions, even after 7 days. Considering these results, ketones 5–7 formed the basis of diketones in which one ketone was designed to be resistant to ATH, providing a potentially valuable element for directing selectivity.
Toward this end, a series of 1,3-diketones 8a–24a were prepared by deprotonation of 5–7 with NaH to generate an enolate, followed by addition of the requisite ester (Figure 3, Supporting Information). The products, 8b–24b, from the ATH of the diketones, using 1.0 mol % catalyst (R,R)-2 in FA/TEA/DCM, are shown in Figure 4.
Figure 3.
Synthetic route to 1,3-diketones 8a–24a and subsequent ATH to alcohols 8b–24b. The diketones were predominantly in the enol form (by NMR). Yields of 8a–12a were 51–88%, those of 13a–17a were 29–67%, and those of 18a–24a were 48–86%. Racemic standards were prepared using a ca. 1:1 mixture of each enantiomer of the same catalyst.
Figure 4.

Products of ATH of diketones 8a–24a using catalyst (R,R)-2, except for 18a and 21a, for which (S,S)-2 was used. Reaction time is 24h unless a different time is listed. Full conversion was observed in all cases, isolated yields are listed. Where an X-ray structure was not obtained, the configuration was assigned by analogy.
In all cases, the less hindered ketone was reduced selectively, and in high ee. The R configuration of product 8b was confirmed by an X-ray crystallographic structure analysis, indicating the preference for the para-chlorophenyl ring of the substrate to adopt the position adjacent to the η6-arene ring of the catalyst, while the bulky diortho-methoxyphenyl ring prevented reduction of the adjacent ketone, as predicted. Unsubstituted product 9b and para-methoxy substituted 10b were formed in 98% and 97% ee, respectively. The configurations were assigned as R by analogy with 8b. Introducing ortho-chloro and ortho-methoxy groups onto one phenyl ring of the 1,3-diketone substrates provided a route to products 11b and 12b in 81% and 83% ee, respectively, indicating that an ortho-substituent causes a slight decrease of preference for the aromatic ring to create a CH/π interaction with η6-arene ring of the catalyst.1 However, the electron-rich heterocyclic product 13b was formed in 99% ee with an R-configuration assigned to it.
Similar results were obtained with the pentamethylphenyl series, with products 14b–17b formed in consistently high ee, including the ortho-substituted examples, and an X-ray crystal structure of 15b (formed in high ee of 98%) also confirming that an R- alcohol was formed, analogous to the previous series.7 In the tetramethyl series, products 18b–24b were formed in excellent ee, of >99% in several cases and only slighty lower for the two ortho-substituted examples. The ATH of 18a was carried out on a 1 mmol scale. The X-ray structures of two derivatives (20b and 23b) again served to confirm that the absolute stereochemistry of this series was consistent with the others. The conversion of the ATH products into esters via the Baeyer–Villiger reaction was explored. However, both the reaction of product 8b and its TBS-protected derivative using mCPBA failed to give the anticipated products. Similar attempted oxidations of a pentamethyl derivative also failed (Supporting Information). Donohoe et al. have reported the conversion of pentamethylphenyl ketones to esters through reaction with bromine followed by an alcohol.8 For the conversion of β-hydroxy ketones to esters, however, it was necessary to convert tetramethylketones to the p-hydroxy derivative first, followed by oxidation and trapping with an alcohol.8b,8c Following Donohoe’s protocol, (S)-18b (>99% ee) was reacted with phthaloyl peroxide to give 25, followed by CAN oxidation to give ester 26 with retention of configuration in 98% ee (Figure 5). Apart from confirming the configuration of 18b, this confirms that the Donohoe protocol works without significant decrease in ee.
Figure 5.
Synthetic route to methyl (S)-3-hydroxy-3-phenylpropanoate 24.
1,4-Diketones 27a–30a, the precursors to alcohols 27b–30b were prepared by the reaction between unsaturated carboxylic acid 31 with the requisite aldehyde in the presence of thiazolium salt 32 (Supporting Information).9 Two 1,5-diketones, 33a and 33b, the precursors to alcohols 33b and 34b, were prepared through the reaction of cyclopropane 35 with 36 and 37 respectively, following a reported method (Supporting Information).10 Reduction of ketones 27a–30a, 33a, and 34a using 1 mol % catalyst (S,S)-2 again gave ATH products 27b–30b, 33b, and 34b in high ee (Figure 6) in all cases other than the thiophene derivative 29b. The oxidation of 27b (97% ee) following the protocol in Figure 5 resulted in formation of lactone 38 in >99% ee,11 although with only a 13% yield,12 presumably the result of intramolecular trapping of the intermediate ester by the hydroxy group following the oxidation with CAN.
Figure 6.
(A) Reagents used to prepare 1,4- and 1,5-diketones for this study. (B) ATH products of 1,4-diketones and 1,5-diketones rt. 1 mol % (S,S)-2 was used in all cases except for 34b. Isolated yields are listed. The configurations were assigned by analogy with the 1,3-series. (C) Oxidation product of 27b.
In a final set of studies, diketones 39a–41a were prepared in order to test the ATH of diketones in which the ketones are in different environments (Figure 7). The unhindered diketone 39a was converted to diol 39b in high dr and ee; following the reaction over time revealed that the internal α-alkoxy ketone was reduced ahead of the peripheral acetophenone, i.e. via 42, likely due to the activating effect of the electron-withdrawing ArO group.13 The ATH of 40a and 41a resulted in the reduction of only the unhindered ketone in 40b and 41b, in 97% and 99% ee respectively, again demonstrating the complete control of regioselectivity which can be achieved by strategically placed bulky 2,6-substituents flanking the ketone (Figure 7). The absolute configuration of 40b was confirmed by an X-ray crystal analysis (see the Supporting Information).
Figure 7.
ATH of diketones with the ketones in nonsymmetrical positions. Diketone 39a was also reduced with (S,S)-2, giving the product of opposite configuration.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that certain bulky 2,6-disubstituted-aryls can prevent the ATH of adjacent ketones and hence facilitate the selective reduction of one ketone in a diketone, with high enantioselectivity. The products can subsequently be elaborated to further derivatives. This application may be of value when a regioselective reduction of one carbonyl is required, leaving the others available for further transformation.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Ministry of Higher Education of the Arab Republic of Egypt for support of N.K. through a fully funded Newton-Mosharafa scholarship [NMM4/20]. The X-ray diffraction instrument for CCDC 2276986–2276989 was obtained through the Science City Project with support from Advantage West Midlands (AWM) and partial funding by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). Single-crystal X-ray diffraction measurements for CCDC 2324377 were made using equipment housed within the X-ray Diffraction Research Technology Platform at Warwick University with funding from EPSRC grant EP/X034836/1. Catalysts (R,R)-2 and (S,S)-2 used in this project were a generous gift from Johnson Matthey CCT. The authors thank Professor Tim Donohoe for helpful discussions.
Data Availability Statement
The data underlying this study are available in the published article, in its Supporting Information, and openly available in http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/.
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.joc.3c01950.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- a Arai N.; Ohkuma T. In Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Transfer Hydrogenation; Ratovelomanana-Vidal V., Phansavath P., Eds.; Wiley: 2021; ISBN 978-3-527-82230-0. [Google Scholar]; b Wang D.; Astruc D. The Golden Age of Transfer Hydrogenation. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 6621–6686. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Noyori R.; Hashiguchi S. Asymmetric Transfer Hydrogenation Catalyzed by Chiral Ruthenium Complexes. Acc. Chem. Res. 1997, 30, 97–102. 10.1021/ar9502341. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; d Nedden H. G.; Zanotti-Gerosa A.; Wills M. The Development of Phosphine-Free Tethered Ruthenium(II) Catalysts for the Asymmetric Reduction of Ketones and Imines. Chem. Rec. 2016, 16, 2623–2643. 10.1002/tcr.201600084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Fujii A.; Hashiguchi S.; Uematsu N.; Ikariya T.; Noyori R. Ruthenium(II)-Catalyzed Asymmetric Transfer Hydrogenation of Ketones Using a Formic Acid–Triethylamine Mixture. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2521–2522. 10.1021/ja954126l. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Hashiguchi S.; Fujii A.; Takehara J.; Ikariya T.; Noyori R. Ruthenium(II)-Catalyzed Asymmetric Transfer Hydrogenation of Ketones Using a Formic Acid–Triethylamine Mixture. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7562–7563. 10.1021/ja00133a037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Touge T.; Nara H.; Fujiwhara M.; Kayaki Y.; Ikariya T. Efficient Access to Chiral Benzhydrols via Asymmetric Transfer Hydrogena-tion of Unsymmetrical Benzophenones with Bifunctional Oxo-Tethered Ruthenium Catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 10084–10087. 10.1021/jacs.6b05738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Dub P. A.; Gordon J. C. The mechanism of enantioselective ketone reduction with Noyori and Noyori-Ikariya bifunctional catalysts. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 6756–6781. 10.1039/C6DT00476H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Dub P. A.; Gordon J. C. Metal-Ligand Bifunctional Catalysis: The “Accepted” Mechanism, the Issue of Concertedness, and the Function of the Ligand in Catalytic Cycles Involving Hydrogen Atoms. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 6635–6655. 10.1021/acscatal.7b01791. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Dub P. A.; Tkachenko N. V.; Vyas V. K.; Wills M.; Smith J. S.; Tretiak S. Enantioselectivity in the Noyori-Ikariya Asymmetric Transfer Hydrogenation of Ketones. Organometallics 2021, 40, 1402–1410. 10.1021/acs.organomet.1c00201. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- a Murata K.; Okano K.; Miyagi M.; Iwane H.; Noyori R.; Ikariya T. A Practical Stereoselective Synthesis of Chiral Hydrobenzoins via Asymmetric Transfer Hydrogenation of Benzils. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1119–1121. 10.1021/ol990226a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Koike T.; Murata K.; Ikariya T. Stereoselective Synthesis of Optically Active α-Hydroxy Ketones and anti-1,2-Diols via Asymmetric Transfer Hydrogenation of Unsymmetrically Substituted 1,2-Diketones. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3833–3836. 10.1021/ol0002572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Chen Y.-C.; Deng J.-G.; Wu T.-F.; Cui X.; Jiang Y.-Z.; Choi M. C. K.; Chan A. S. C. Facile Preparation of Chiral 1, 3-Diols via Stereoselective Transfer Hydrogenation of 1, 3-Diones. Chin. J. Chem. 2001, 19, 807–810. 10.1002/cjoc.20010190817. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; d Touge T.; Hakamata T.; Nara H.; Kobayashi T.; Sayo N.; Saito T.; Kayaki Y.; Ikariya T. Oxo-Tethered Ruthenium(II) Complex as a Bifunctional Catalyst for Asymmetric Transfer Hydrogenation and H2 Hydrogenation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 14960–14963. 10.1021/ja207283t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Kišić A.; Stephan M.; Mohar B. ansa-Ruthenium(II) Complexes of DPEN-SO2N(Me)(CH2)n(η6-aryl) Conjugate Ligands for Asymmetric Transfer Hydrogenation of Aryl Ketones. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014, 356, 3193–3198. 10.1002/adsc.201400265. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; f Fang Z.; Wills M. Asymmetric Transfer Hydrogenation of Functionalized Acetylenic Ketones. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 8594–8605. 10.1021/jo401284c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g Zhang H.; Feng D.; Sheng H.; Ma X.; Wan J.; Tang Q. Asymmetric transfer hydrogenation of unsymmetrical benzils. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 6417–6423. 10.1039/c3ra47129b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- a Wu Y.; Geng Z.; Bai J.; Zhang Y. Synthesis of Chiral 2-Aroyl-1-tetralols: Asymmetric Transfer Hydrogenation of 2-Aroyl-1-tetralones via Dynamic Kinetic Resolution. Chin. J. Chem. 2011, 29, 1467–1472. 10.1002/cjoc.201180267. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Cotman A. E.; Cahard D.; Mohar B. Stereoarrayed CF3-Substituted 1,3-Diols by Dynamic Kinetic Resolution: Ruthenium(II)-Catalyzed Asymmetric Transfer Hydrogenation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 5294–5298. 10.1002/anie.201600812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Ding Y.-X.; Zhu Z.-H.; Wang H.; Yu C.-B.; Zhou Y.-G. Construction of three stereocenters via hydrogenative desymmetrization of 2,2,5-trisubstituted cyclohexane-1,3-diones. Science China Chemistry 2021, 64, 232–237. 10.1007/s11426-020-9873-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; d Shi B.; Merten S.; Wong D. K. Y.; Chu J. C. K.; Liu L. L.; Lam S. K.; Jäger A.; Wong W.-T.; Chiu P.; Metz P. The Rhodium-Catalyzed Carbene Cyclization Cycloaddition Cascade Reaction of Vinylsulfonates. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 3128–3132. 10.1002/adsc.200900695. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; e Kuang L.; Liu L. L.; Chiu P. Formal Total Synthesis of (+)-Cortistatins A and J. Chem. - Eur. J. 2015, 21, 14287–14291. 10.1002/chem.201502890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Kisic A.; Stephan M.; Mohar B. Asymmetric Transfer Hydrogenation of 1-Naphthyl Ketones by an ansa-Ru(II) Complex of a DPEN-SO2N(Me)-(CH2) 2 (η6-p-Tol) Combined Ligand. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 1614–1617. 10.1021/ol400393j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Kisic A.; Stephan M.; Mohar B. ansa-Ruthenium(II) Complexes of DPEN-SO2N(Me)(CH2)n(η6-aryl) Conjugate Ligands for Asymmetric Transfer Hydrogenation of Aryl Ketones. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014, 356, 3193–3198. 10.1002/adsc.201400265. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- The unsubstituted derivative (i.e., Ar = Ph) of the pentamethyl, 1,3-dicarbonyl series was prepared, but the ATH product could not be resolved by HPLC and the ee is unknown (see the Supporting Information).
- a Frost J. R.; Cheong C. B.; Akhtar W. M.; Caputo D. F. J.; Christensen K. E.; Stevenson N. J.; Donohoe T. J. Hydrogen borrowing catalysis using 1° and 2° alcohols: Investigation and scope leading to α and β branched products. Tetrahedron 2021, 86, 132051. 10.1016/j.tet.2021.132051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Cheong C. B.; Frost J. R.; Donohoe T. J. Pentamethylphenyl (Ph*) and Related Derivatives as Useful Acyl Protecting Groups for Organic Synthesis: A Preliminary Study. Synlett 2020, 31, 1828–1832. 10.1055/s-0040-1707289. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Crompton J. L.; Frost J. R.; Rowe S. M.; Christensen K. E.; Donohoe T. J. Synthesis of Cyclopropanes via Hydrogen-Borrowing Catalysis. Org. Lett. 2023, 25, 5253–5257. 10.1021/acs.orglett.3c01768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song J.; Shao P.-L.; Wang J.; Huang F.; Zhang X. Asymmetric hydrogenation of 1,4-diketones: facile synthesis of enantiopure 1,4-diarylbutane-1,4-diols. Chem. Commun. 2021, 58, 262–265. 10.1039/D1CC05359K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang X.; Li J.; He H.; Yan K.; Lai R.; Luo Y.; Guan M.; Wu Y. Ruthenium-Catalyzed Alkylation of Cyclopropanols with Sulfoxonium Ylides via C-C Bond Cleavage: Formation of Diverse 1,5-Diketones. Synthesis 2022, 54, 779–787. 10.1055/a-1588-0974. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Brown H. C.; Kulkarni S. V.; Racherla U. S. Chiral Synthesis via Organoboranes. 39. A Facile Synthesis of γ-Substituted-γ-butyrolactones in Exceptionally High Enantiomeric Purity. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 365–369. 10.1021/jo00081a014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- The intermediate p-hydroxyketone in the conversion of 27b to 38 (i.e., the analogue of 25) was found to have a lower ee than either 27b or 38. See the Supporting Information.
- Soni R.; Hall T. H.; Mitchell B. P.; Owen M. R.; Wills M. Electron-withdrawing groups are known to increase the rate of ATH reactions; Asymmetric reduction of electron-rich ketones with tethered Ru(II)/TsDPEN catalysts using formic acid/triethylamine or aqueous sodium formate. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 6784–6793. 10.1021/acs.joc.5b00990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data underlying this study are available in the published article, in its Supporting Information, and openly available in http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/.







