Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2024 Feb 7;18(2):e0011930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011930

Host gastric corpus microenvironment facilitates Ascaris suum larval hatching and infection in a murine model

Yifan Wu 1, Grace Adeniyi-Ipadeola 2, Mahliyah Adkins-Threats 3,4,5, Matthew Seasock 6, Charlie Suarez-Reyes 1, Ricardo Fujiwara 7, Maria Elena Bottazzi 1,2,8, Lizhen Song 6, Jason C Mills 3,4,5, Jill E Weatherhead 1,8,9,*
Editor: Aaron R Jex10
PMCID: PMC10878500  PMID: 38324590

Abstract

Ascariasis (roundworm) is the most common parasitic helminth infection globally and can lead to significant morbidity in children including chronic lung disease. Children become infected with Ascaris spp. via oral ingestion of eggs. It has long been assumed that Ascaris egg hatching and larval translocation across the gastrointestinal mucosa to initiate infection occurs in the small intestine. Here, we show that A. suum larvae hatched in the host stomach in a murine model. Larvae utilize acidic mammalian chitinase (AMCase; acid chitinase; Chia) from chief cells and acid pumped by parietal cells to emerge from eggs on the surface of gastric epithelium. Furthermore, antagonizing AMCase and gastric acid in the stomach decreases parasitic burden in the liver and lungs and attenuates lung disease. Given Ascaris eggs are chitin-coated, the gastric corpus would logically be the most likely organ for egg hatching, though this is the first study directly evincing the essential role of the host gastric corpus microenvironment. These findings point towards potential novel mechanisms for therapeutic targets to prevent ascariasis and identify a new biomedical significance of AMCase in mammals.

Author summary

Ascariasis is the most common helminth infection and leads to significant global morbidity. Current therapies specifically target intraluminal adult intestinal worms and do not provide sufficient protection against the Ascaris larva. To reduce Ascaris-induced morbidity, novel interventions are needed that target Ascaris larval migration which calls for a better understanding of the Ascaris larval migration cycle. After oral ingestion of Ascaris eggs, previous studies have indicated that Ascaris larval migration initiates in the small intestine. However, our study demonstrates that Ascaris larva begin the migration cycle by hatching in the stomach by using the host’s acidic mammalian chitinase and stomach acid to help degrade the chitinous egg shell. The larvae subsequently translocate across the stomach mucosa in this mouse model. Our study provides the first insight that the gastric corpus microenvironment plays a critical role in Ascaris egg hatching and initiation of infection, and will aid in the identification of novel drug targets.

Introduction

Ascariasis (roundworm) is the most common parasitic helminth infection globally, affecting approximately 500 million people [1]. In endemic regions, people are infected in infancy and endure recurrent infection throughout childhood [2,3]. Children become infected with either Ascaris lumbricoides, the human roundworm, or Ascaris suum, the porcine roundworm, via oral ingestion of eggs that are ubiquitous within the environment [4,5]. Once ingested, Ascaris larvae hatch in the gastrointestinal tract and undergo a highly immunogenic, transient larval migratory phase through the host liver and host lungs before returning to the intestines and developing into adult worms [6]. High Ascaris worm burden and significant re-infection rates in children living in endemic regions leads to profound life-long morbidity [7,8]. Ascaris larval migration through the lungs is associated with the development of several pulmonary diseases like asthma, while chronic intestinal ascariasis causes growth stunting, cognitive delays, malnutrition, abdominal pain and obstruction [3,6,9,10]. Together, these ascariasis-related pathologies lead to 800,000 disability adjusted life years (DALYS) worldwide [1].

Current anthelminthic therapy such as benzimidazoles used in mass drug administration campaigns specifically target intraluminal, adult intestinal worms. However, these anthelminthic therapies do not prevent Ascaris infection and do not provide sufficient protection against the Ascaris larval migration cycle because intestinal absorption of the drugs tend to be poor, and drug treatment has to be precisely timed to the relatively rapid transitions during larval stages [11]. As a result, children living in endemic regions are vulnerable to repeated bouts of Ascaris infection and Ascaris-induced morbidity [7,8]. Understanding the mechanisms that aid in Ascaris infectivity and the Ascaris larval migratory cycle could identify therapeutic targets to reduce Ascaris infection and Ascaris-induced morbidity in children around the world.

The molecular mechanisms of Ascaris egg hatching and translocation across the gastrointestinal mucosa remains largely unknown. Prior studies suggest that Ascaris larvae hatch in the small intestines or the colon and translocate across the intestinal mucosa to initiate the larval migration cycle [6,12,13]. However, a previous study demonstrated that repeated oral inoculation of piglets with Ascaris eggs can lead to the development of gastric ulcers, but the mechanism of ulcer development remains unknown [14]. In this study, we demonstrate that A. suum larvae utilize the gastric corpus microenviroment to aid in larval hatching from the ingested eggs and subsequently translocate across gastrointestinal mucosa using our established A. suum larval migration murine model.

Results

Initiation of A. suum larval migration occurs in the mouse stomach

After ingestion, Ascaris eggs hatch in the gastrointestinal tract, translocate across the mucosa and migrate to the liver via the portal vasculature [15]. A prior mouse study used Evan’s blue dye (EBD) to demonstrate increased intestinal vasculature permeability following ingestion of Ascaris eggs to suggest Ascaris larval translocate across the intestines [12]. To confirm these findings, we utilized our standard Ascaris larval migration murine model in which BALB/c mice were challenged with 2,500 A. suum eggs via oral gavage [10,15]. We measured the permeability of the gastrointestinal tract vasculature of mice 1 day post infection by introducing EBD intravenously 1 hour prior to euthanasia and measuring total extravasated dye in homogenized tissue gastrointestinal segments at 620 nm by spectrophotometer after whole-body perfusion [12]. Surprisingly, in contrast to the previous study using the EBD technique [12], total dye in tissue was not increased in any segment of the intestines suggesting a lack of vascular permeability in the intestines following Ascaris infection (Fig 1A). However, we found increased EBD extravasation into the stomach tissue (Fig 1B). This result implied that the stomach may play a role in Ascaris larval hatching and mucosal translocation leading to infection.

Fig 1. Ascaris suum larva hatch in and migrate through the stomach: BALB/c mice were challenged by oral gavage with 2,500 eggs of Ascaris once.

Fig 1

(A-B) Evan’s blue dye (EBD) was introduced intravenously to mice 1 day post infection. Recovery of EBD from (A) the intestine segments and (B) the stomach were quantified. (C) H&E and (D) PAS staining were performed on stomach sections 30 minutes post infection. Brown triangles indicate foveolar cells and black arrows indicate larval penetration across gastric mucosa. (n≥4, mean±S.E.M, *p<0.05 using two-tailed Student’s t-test. Magnification: 200×. Scale bar: 150μm. Data are shown as representative of three independent experiments).

To verify this hypothesis, using the Ascaris murine model, defined segments of the gastrointestinal tract from the esophagus to the colon were examined pathologically for evidence of Ascaris invasion over 4 days. We found no evidence of Ascaris larvae or mucosal damage in the esophagus or intestinal segments at any time point post infection 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 4 hours, 14 hours, 24 hours and 4 days (S1 Fig–demonstrates histology 12 hours, 24 hours and 4 days post infection). However, in the stomach, egg fragments and hatched Ascaris larvae aligned along the gastric corpus mucosa at 15 minutes post infection and larval structures were observed penetrating the gastric corpus mucosa as soon as 30 minutes post infection using H&E staining (Fig 1C). In foci where larvae were hatching and beginning to invade the gastric corpus epithelium, surface (foveolar) cells were damaged with increased PAS-positive mucin evident (Fig 1D). Together, these data suggest that A. suum eggs hatch in the mouse stomach, not intestines, with eggs abutting or adhering to the foveolar cells, and larvae quickly penetrate the gastric corpus mucosa to initiate larval migration.

Gastric AMCase and gastric acid promote A. suum egg hatching

The gastric corpus mucosal barrier depends on repeated invaginated gastric units composed of mucous producing surface foveolar cells, stem cells, enteroendocrine cells, acid-secreting parietal cells, and pepsinogen and digestive-enzyme-secreting chief cells [1618]. Eggs of Ascaris spp. are covered by a thick layer of chitin that ensures structural integrity in prolonged, harsh environmental conditions [19,20] but which must be degraded for Ascaris larvae to hatch and cause infection. To determine the mechanism of Ascaris egg hatching in the gastric corpus, we focused on the acidic mammalian chitinase (AMCase), a pH-dependent, protease-resistant, glycosidase, found in the lungs and the stomach, that hydrolyzes inhaled or ingested chitin [2124]. Within the stomach AMCase is secreted only by chief cells which themselves reside only in the gastric corpus [22,25]. Because the gastric corpus is also the site of acid production, and AMCase functions optimally at low pH, we reasoned that the corpus would be the ideal anatomical location for chitin-coated Ascaris eggs to hatch. Chief cells secrete AMCase to hydrolyze ingested chitin-containing material, allowing for digestion of chitin-coated food sources (like insects and crustaceans) as well as offering potential protection against chitin-coated fungi13,[24]. Gastric acid secretion is a highly regulated process maintained through a H+/K+ ATPase, a parietal cell proton pump [26]. Together, AMCase and gastric acid play an integral role in initiating digestion of chitinous food sources as well as composing the gastric barrier resistance against invasive chitinous pathogens [23,26,27]. Thus, we first evaluated the effect of AMCase in acidic conditions on A. suum egg hatching in vitro. We treated A. suum eggs with human AMCase (9859-GH-050, R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN) or control at pH = 2 or pH = 7 at 37°C overnight and measured larval hatching [24]. AMCase treatment at pH = 2 significantly increased the hatch rate of sham-treated eggs by almost 3-fold, which was significantly greater as compared to AMCase-treated eggs at neutral pH (Fig 2A). In addition to AMCase, chief cells also secrete the inactive zymogen pepsinogen, which is cleaved to pepsin in acidic gastric conditions and aids in protein digestion [24,26]. To evaluate the role of pepsin in larval hatching, we treated A. suum eggs with 4 or 8 μg/ml of pepsin at pH = 2 at 37°C overnight and measured larval hatching in vitro [24]. Unlike treatment with AMCase, treatment with pepsin did not aid in larval hatching (S2 Fig).

Fig 2.

Fig 2

AMCase in acidic conditions promotes Ascaris larval hatching: (A) Ascaris eggs were treated with recombinant AMCase under acidic and neutral pH in vitro. Larval hatch rate was quantified post treatment. (B-C) BALB/c mice were challenged by oral gavage with 2,500 eggs of Ascaris and stomach tissue was harvested 1 hour or 1 day post infection to extract total RNA. Chia1 (B) and Atp4a (C) expression level were quantified by qPCR. (D) BALB/c mice were pretreated with AMCase inhibitor, omeprazole, 10% NaHCO3 or vehicle control before challenged by oral gavage with 2,500 eggs of Ascaris. (E-F) Larva isolated from the liver 4 days post infection under different conditions was quantified. (n≥4, mean±S.E.M, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001 using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test for multiple comparison (A), two-tailed Student’s t-test (B, C, E) or one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test for multiple comparison (F). Data are shown as representative of two independent experiments. Illustration generated by Biorender.com).

To determine if the immediate post-gastric intestinal microenvironment also enhanced egg hatching in vitro, we incubated A. suum eggs in PBS with a pH = 2 for 30 minutes. The acidic solution was removed and eggs were resuspended in neutral solution containing trypsin, bile salt or complete bile, components of biliary fluid and pancreatic enzyme secretion, to mimic the duodenum compartment, at 37°C overnight. However, minimum hatching was observed in all conditions after 24 hours (S3 Fig). These results suggest that AMCase, at physiologic gastric pH of 2, is critical for Ascaris egg hatching in vitro.

To verify the role of AMCase and gastric acid in A. suum infection in vivo, we first assessed production of AMCase and gastric acid production post Ascaris infection. Mice were infected with 2,500 eggs of A. suum by oral gavage and stomach tissue was removed at predetermined time intervals post infection (1 hour and 1 day). AMCase (Chia1) and H+/K+ ATPase (Atp4a) expression was measured by qPCR. Ingestion of A. suum eggs upregulated both AMCase (Fig 2B) and H+-K+-ATPase (Fig 2C) production in the stomach, starting at 1 hour post infection. These results suggest that the stomach acutely responds to A. suum eggs by upregulating production of AMCase and gastric acid.

To assess the effect of AMCase and/or gastric acid in vivo, we pre-treated mice with the AMCase inhibitor 112252, omeprazole (a commercially available proton pump inhibitor), or 10% sodium bicarbonate by oral gavage once, 1 hour prior to infection with 2,500 Ascaris eggs and measured larval burden in the liver at 4 days post infection [15] (Fig 2D). Following oral ingestion of Ascaris eggs and the initiation of the larval migratory cycle, Ascaris larvae migrate via the portal vasculature to the liver at day 4 post infection and subsequently migrate via systemic circulatory system to the lungs at day 8 post infection [15]. Thus, the liver is the first organ system, following oral ingestion of Ascaris eggs, that can be evaluated to determine Ascaris larval burden. We found that chitinase inhibition, proton pump inhibition and acid neutralization with sodium bicarbonate all independently decreased the number of larvae migrating to the liver (Fig 2E). In addition, to assess if there is a cumulative effect of antagonizing both AMCase and gastric acid simultaneously, we treated mice with AMCase inhibitor and omeprazole prior to Ascaris infection by oral gavage. We found that combined inhibition of AMCase and gastric acid significantly reduced larval migration to the liver compared to either treatment alone (Fig 2F). Corroborating with our in vitro data, we have demonstrated that inhibiting AMCase and gastric acid reduces A. suum larval migration likely as a result of reduced egg hatching in the stomach. Together, our data strongly support the concept that AMCase and gastric acid facilitate A. suum larval hatching and initiation of the larval migratory cycle.

Tamoxifen treatment interrupts A. suum larval migration

To better delineate the role of the gastric corpus cellular function in larval hatching and larval migration, we utilized the high-dose tamoxifen (TMX) treatment model, in which mice were pretreated with TMX (250 mg/kg) daily for three days followed by infection with A. suum eggs by oral gavage (Fig 3A). TMX treatment in mice induces parietal cell loss and chief cell reprogramming into spasmolytic polypeptide-expression metaplasia (SPEM) cells. With parietal cell death, acid secretion decreases greatly. And when chief cells reprogram to SPEM cells, they lose most digestive enzyme production, thus likely causing greatly decreased gastric expression of Chia1, the gene encoding AMCase [28,29]. We first confirmed this observation by demonstrating that TMX treatment nearly abolished gastric AMCase and H+/K+ ATPase expression by qPCR (Fig 3B and 3C).

Fig 3. Tamoxifen reduces AMCase and acid production in stomach which limits Ascaris larval migration.

Fig 3

(A) BALB/c mice were pretreated with tamoxifen intraperitoneally before challenged by oral gavage with 2,500 eggs of Ascaris, in PBS or vehicle containing recombinant AMCase at pH 2. Reduction of (B) AMCase and (C) H+-K+ ATPase was confirmed by qPCR. (D) Larval isolated from the liver 4 days post infection were quantified. (n≥4, mean±S.E.M, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ****p<0.0001 using two-tailed Student’s t-test (B, C) or one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test for multiple comparison (D). Data are shown as representative of two independent experiments. Illustration generated by Biorender.com).

Next, we infected TMX-treated mice with A. suum eggs by oral gavage and measured larval burden in the liver 4 days post infection. Pre-treatment with TMX reduced Ascaris larval count in the liver by more than 90% (Fig 3D). Simultaneously, we performed a rescue experiment with a subset of TMX-treated mice in which mice were infected with eggs of A. suum in vehicle containing recombinant AMCase at pH = 2. In comparison, exogenous treatment of A. suum eggs with AMCase in acidic solution permitted increased larval burden in the liver towards baseline levels. This experiment further confirmed that AMCase from chief cells and gastric acid from parietal cells are both critical for the initiation of A. suum larval migration in vivo.

Inhibition of AMCase and gastric acid prevents downstream Ascaris-induced airway hyperreactivity

Previously, we have reported that A. suum larval migration through the lungs induces severe acute airway hyperresponsiveness consistent with allergic airway disease [10]. To assess the effect of AMCase and gastric acid on larval migration and the subsequent development of lung pathology, we pretreated mice with both AMCase inhibitor and omeprazole before infection with 2,500 eggs of A. suum as stated above. A subset of mice was euthanized on day 8 post infection to assess larval lung burdens. On day 12 post infection airway reactivity was assessed as previously described8 (Fig 4A). We found significantly reduced larval burdens in the lungs 8 days post infection in mice pretreated with AMCase inhibitor and omeprazole, similar to results from liver (Fig 4B). Moreover, we discovered that antagonizing both AMCase and gastric acid production significantly reduced airway hyperresponsiveness as measured by decreased respiratory system resistance (RRS) (Fig 4C). Inhibition of AMCase and gastric acid prior to Ascaris infection also ameliorated Ascaris larval migration-induced weight loss (Fig 4D), and reduced lung type 2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, IL-13), which have been shown to be important mediators of Ascaris-induced allergic airway disease8 (Fig 4E). Thus, inhibition of AMCase and gastric acid strongly inhibits Ascaris larval migration and reduces pulmonary morbidity in a murine model.

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Omeprazole and AMCase inhibitor reduce airway hyperresponsiveness induced by Ascaris larval migration through the lungs (A) BALB/c mice were pretreated with omeprazole plus AMCase inhibitor or vehicle control before challenge by oral gavage with 2,500 eggs of Ascaris. (B) Larval burden was quantified from the lungs 8 days post infection. (C) Respiratory system resistance (RRS) was assessed after intravenous injection of increasing doses of acetylcholine (Ach) at 12 days post infection. (D) Body weight loss in mice was measured at 12 days post infection. (E) Type-2 cytokines were quantitated by ELISA from deaggregated lung supernatants. (n = 4, mean±S.E.M, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001 using two-tailed Student’s t-test (B) or one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test for multiple comparison (C-E). Data are shown as representative of two independent experiments. Illustration generated by Biorender.com).

Discussion

In this study, we have demonstrated for the first time that A. suum larvae hatch from ingested eggs in the host stomach and may penetrate the gastric mucosa to initiate the essential larval migratory cycle in a murine model. Larval hatching and penetration of the gastric mucosa occurs as soon as 30 minutes after ingestion of eggs in this model [30]. Mechanistically, we have discovered that Ascaris utilizes the unique microenvironment of the gastric corpus to promote efficient hatching across the gastric corpus mucosa.

Chitin is a dietary fiber that provides structure to microbes such as fungi and helminth parasites as well as insects and crustaceans [31]. To support the degradation of chitin, gastric chief cells found in the gastric corpus secrete AMCase in order to hydrolyze chitin [23,24]. Acidic conditions that allow AMCase activity in the gastric corpus are maintained by gastric parietal cell expression of the proton pump H+-K+-ATPase enzyme which modulates cytoplasmic H+ and extracellular K+ exchange [32]. Physiologically, AMCase and gastric acid are responsible for not only breaking down chitinous food and maintaining mucosal homeostasis, but also provide the first line of defense against pathogens containing chitin including both fungi and parasites [23,24,27,33]. Interestingly Ascaris egg shells, which are ingested by the host from the external environment, are made of a chitin-protein layer that is 1.5 to 2 μm in thickness. This chitinous egg shell provides protection to the larvae during the developmental phase that occurs within moist, humid soil [34]. Because of this thick chitinase exterior, Ascaris eggs can survive for decades in the soil and remain viable [35,36]. However, to cause infection in the host, the chitinous egg shell must be degraded quickly in the host after ingestion. Thus, the gastric corpus microenvironment with abundant acid pumped by parietal cells and acid-dependent chitinase from chief cells, is likely the ideal microenvironment for Ascaris egg hatching.

To evaluate the specific role of AMCase and gastric acid in Ascaris infection, we specifically antagonized AMCase and gastric acid function using orally administered inhibitors which lead to reduced Ascaris larval burden and subsequent reduced lung morbidity. Additionally, when TMX induces acute pyloric metaplasia of the entire gastric corpus with death of parietal cells and conversion of chief cells to a mucous-secreting metaplastic cell lineage, Ascaris infectious burden was also reduced. Furthermore, we show that commercially available acid neutralizers and acid inhibitors like omeprazole reduced overall infection and long-term morbidity. Moreover, in addition to the impact on ascariasis, these findings have important implications for other helminths that are transmitted by oral ingestion of eggs, such as Trichuris spp. and Toxocara spp. [35,37,38]. It is possible that the gastric microenvironment may have broad application to the infectivity of other parasitic diseases of global significance.

The role of AMCase in helminth immunity has been investigated in other helminths such as Nippstrongylus brasiliensis, Schistosoma mansoni and Heligomosomides polygyrus bakeri in the lungs during acute infection and in the intestines during chronic infection [39]. Previous studies have shown that AMCase is an essential part of mucosal immunity and induces type 2 immune responses during allergic inflammation in the lungs. Use of an AMCase inhibitor (Bisdionin F) eliminated pulmonary allergic inflammation including eosinophilia in an allergic airway model [40]. Furthermore, AMCase has been shown to influence type 2 immunity in the intestines of Nippostrongylus infected mice. Mice deficient in AMCase were found to have reduced type 2 inflammation in the intestines and retention of adult worms suggesting AMCase is critical for the eradication of adult intestinal parasites [39]. Studies evaluating AMCase mediated type 2 immunity in the stomach have yet to be evaluated. However, given the high risk of reinfection, AMCase secretion in the stomach may play a key evolutionary role in parasite eradication during subsequent infection.

Our novel findings are in contradiction to the canonical model of Ascaris infection suggesting Ascaris larvae hatch and migrate through the intestine in mice [12]. It remains possible that Ascaris eggs utilize the gastric corpus microenvironment for hatching but the hatched larvae subsequently translocate across the intestinal mucosa. However, in the Ascaris murine model we found no evidence that Ascaris larvae initiate infection in the intestines including no evidence of hatched larvae, mucosal damage or inflammatory infiltrate in the duodenum, jejunum, ileum or colon at serial time points post ingestion of Ascaris eggs. We did identify hatched larvae along the gastric corpus mucosal membrane and larvae actively translocating the stomach mucosa with development of increased epithelial mucin. Moreover, given the need for the chitinous Ascaris eggs to be digested before larval hatching, it makes teleological sense that the anatomical location with the most chitinase in the alimentary tract as well as the low pH needed to activate that chitinase would be where Ascaris would hatch. In the current study we used in vitro assays and mouse models to evaluate the gastric corpus microenvironment and did not assay larval hatching in the stomach of pigs or human (the natural hosts of ascariasis). This is an important limitation and focus of our future work as expression of AMCase has been shown to be increased in mice compared to humans [41]. Despite lower concentrations in humans compared to mice, the AMCase and pH microenvironment of the gastric corpus still plays a functional role in human and porcine digestion and immunity. Furthermore, AMCase concentrations in the stomach of pigs has been found to be highly expressed [22]. Thus, our murine model provides the first insight that the gastric corpus microenvironment plays a critical role in Ascaris egg hatching and initiation of infection. Additional experiments are being carried out to verify the role of the gastric microenvironment in our porcine Ascaris infection model.

Ascaris is the most common helminth infection in the world and is a cause of significant life-long morbidity particularly in young children. We have previously shown in a murine model that Ascaris larval migration through the host is particularly devastating leading to conditions such as chronic lung disease after a single infection. This study has shown that Ascaris larval penetration through the gastric mucosa causes acute gastric damage as well, including reduced gastric vasculature integrity after a single infection, although the long-term consequences remain unknown. However, children living in Ascaris endemic regions are constantly re-infected as a result of ingestion of eggs that are ubiquitous within their environment. As a result, repeat damage to the gastric mucosa from recurrent infection may put children at risk for the development of gastric disease such as pyloric metaplasia or potentially predispose them to co-infection with other gastric pathogens like H. pylori that share a similar risk factor profile and geographic niche [4244]. Conversely, as H. pylori causes extensive pyloric metaplasia in many people [17,45] (as we model here by acute induction with TMX), chronic H. pylori infection might eventually be protective against infection with Ascaris and other helminths that depend on AMCase for hatching. Studies are underway to explore the long-term consequences of Ascaris infection on chronic gastric pathology and vice versa.

This study has significant implications for Ascaris elimination programs. To date, Ascaris disease prevalence has decreased as a result of mass drug administration policies that provide annual or biannual benzimidazole therapy in endemic regions but are unlikely to lead to elimination without additional long-term coordinated interventions [46]. Despite mass drug administration programs, reinfection rates remain high due to the persistence of Ascaris eggs within the environment [7]. Furthermore, the current therapeutic interventions available do not prevent infection from occurring but only treat established intestinal ascariasis. Thus, with each reinfection episode, children are at risk of continued larval-induced pathology. Treatments that prevent infection are needed and may be the only way to achieve elimination of ascariasis on a global scale. Developing a deeper understanding of the role of the gastric microenvironment in facilitating Ascaris infection is the first step to identifying preventative interventions.

Methods

Ethics statement

All mice were housed at the American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care-accredited vivarium at Baylor College of Medicine under specific-pathogen-free conditions. Upon arrival, complete randomization of mice into longitudinal groups was performed. All experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Baylor College of Medicine and followed federal guidelines (AN-6297).

Mice

8 week-old BALB/c female mice (IMSR_JAX:000651) were purchased from Jackson Laboratories. Female mice were used to ensure consistency in infectious burden [9].

A. suum experimental murine model

Embryonated A. suum eggs were provided by Dr. Ricardo Fujiwara, Departamento de Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil. BALB/c mice were treated with a single inoculum of 2,500 fully embryonated A. suum eggs via oral gavage [15]. The infectious dose of Ascaris has been standardized in the literature in order to replicate human disease in a murine model [15,47]. The A. suum life cycle in a murine model mimics the life cycle in humans and has been previously described [10,15]. Specifically, Ascaris larvae hatch from ingested eggs and travels to the liver, of which the larval burden peaks at day 4 post infection (p.i.). The larvae then travel to the lungs, with maximum larval burden at day 8 p.i., ascend the bronchotracheal tree and are swallowed back into the intestines. Unlike human disease, the Ascaris murine model is not competent to sustain chronic adult worms in the intestines. Thus, Ascaris larvae are subsequently excreted in the stool by day 14 p.i. The A. suum experimental murine model is only capable of evaluating the direct outcomes of Ascaris larval migration through the host.

Collection and preparation of mouse gastrointestinal tissue

After infection of A. suum, mice were euthanized at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 1 day and 4 days p.i. Esophagus, stomachs, small intestines and colon were harvested and fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin solution, processed, and embedded in paraffin. 5 μm sections were cut and slides were stained with Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or Periodic Acid Schiff (PAS).

Gastrointestinal tract vascular permeability

Mice infected with A. suum at 1 day p.i. and age-matched, PBS-challenged, naïve mice received 60 mg/kg of Evan’s blue dye (E2129, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) injected into the tail vein. The dye circulated for 1 hour and the mice were subsequently euthanized and perfused with saline. Different segments from the gastrointestinal tract, including the stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum and colon were separated and harvested. Tissues were homogenized and centrifuged at 800xg for 10 minutes at room temperature. The supernatant was measured at 620nm in a spectrophotometer and the total extravasated dye in tissue was calculated using a standard curve to determine vascular permeability in the gastrointestinal tract [9,48].

In vitro hatching of A. suum eggs

250 eggs of A. suum were incubated with or without recombinant acidic mammalian chitinase (AMCase, 9859-GH-050, R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN) at 4 μg/ml, at either pH 2 (RPMI plus HCL) or 7 (RPMI), 37°C overnight. Larvae were counted afterwards under the microscope. Alternatively, eggs of A. suum were incubated at pH = 2 for 30 minutes and then cultured overnight in neutral RPMI (11875093, Thermofisher scientific, Waltham MA) containing 0.25% trypsin (15090046, Thermofisher scientific, Waltham MA), and/or 0.1% bile salt, 2% bovine bile (B8756, B3883, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO).

Isolation of A. suum larva from the liver and the lungs in vivo

Mice infected with A. suum eggs were euthanized 4 days p.i. to assess larval burden in the liver. Liver tissue was harvested and macerated with scissors, suspended into pre-warmed PBS and transferred in a modified Baermann apparatus. The collection system was then filled up to 40 ml of pre-warmed PBS and incubated at 37°C for 4 hours. Following incubation, the solution containing larvae was collected from the apparatus, centrifuged at 800 xg for 5 minutes at room temperature, and washed with water to remove red blood cells. Larvae were washed with PBS for additional 3 times and counted under the microscope. Alternatively, lung tissue was harvested from euthanized mice 8 days p.i.. Larvae isolation was carried out through the same procedure.

Inhibition of chitinase and gastric acid in mice

To inhibit gastric chitinase, mice were oral gavaged with human AMCase inhibitor (112252, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) at 5 mg/kg 1 hour prior to infection with A. suum eggs. To reduce or neutralize stomach acid, mice were treated with omeprazole (PHR1059, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) at 20 mg/kg i.p.[49] or 100μl 10% NaHCO3[50], 1 hour prior to infection with A. suum eggs. Larval burden in the liver was assessed 4 days post infection as described above. Inhibiting both AMCase and gastric acid was done through combining the AMCase inhibitor and omeprazole as stated above at the same time 1 hour before infection.

Quantitative PCR

Relative expression of mRNA for Chia1 and Atp4a to 18s was detected by two-step, real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with the 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) using Taqman probe (Mm00458221, Mm00444417, Hs03003631 Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA)[24,41].

Tamoxifen treatment

Prior to infection with A. suum eggs, mice were treated with 250 mg/kg of Tamoxifen (TMX) in corn oil (T5648, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) every day i.p. for 3 days [28,29]. Reduced AMCase and stomach acid production in the stomach of mice post treatment was confirmed using qPCR (Mm00458221_m1, Mm00444417_m1, Thermofisher scientific, Waltham MA) 24 hours after the last dose. TMX or vehicle treated mice were then infected with 2,500 A. suum eggs in PBS. Alternatively, TMX treated mice were infected with 2,500 A. suum eggs in PBS containing 4 μg/ml recombinant AMCase in PBS at pH = 2 (adjusted by adding hydrochloric acid to neutral PBS). Larval burden in the liver was assessed at 4 days post infection as described above.

A. suum induced allergic airway disease

Mice were treated with or without the combination of AMCase inhibitor and omeprazole 1 hour before infection with 2,500 A. suum eggs as described above. At day 12 p.i., body weight loss was quantified. Airway hyperreactivity was determined by measuring respiratory system resistance (RRS) in response to increasing dose of acetylcholine (Ach) injected intravenously as previously described [9,10]. ELISA analysis of whole lung for type 2 cytokines IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 was assessed as previously described (DY 404, DY405, DY413, R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN)[51,52].

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as means ± standard errors of the means. Significant differences relative to PBS-challenged mice or appropriate controls are expressed by P values of <0.05, as measured two tailed Student’s t-test, one-way or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test or Bonferroni’s test for multiple comparison. Data normality was confirmed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Experiments were completed in duplicate.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Intestine of mice post Ascaris larva infection.

Wildtype mice were oral gavaged with 2,500 Ascaris eggs and euthanized at 12 hours, 24 hours or 4 days post infection. H&E staining were carried out on sections of different intestine tissues.

(PDF)

pntd.0011930.s001.pdf (4.4MB, pdf)
S2 Fig. Pepsin does not induce Ascaris larva hatching.

Ascaris eggs are treated with 4 or 8 μg/ml of pepsin in pH = 2 overnight. Larvae hatched from the eggs were counted and hatch rate was calculated.

(PDF)

pntd.0011930.s002.pdf (488.4KB, pdf)
S3 Fig. Ascaris larva does not hatch in intestinal conditions.

Ascaris eggs were treated in pH = 2 for 30 minutes and then in different intestinal conditions overnight. Larval hatch rate was then calculated.

(PDF)

pntd.0011930.s003.pdf (257.3KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

The author thanked Dr. David Corry reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its supporting information files.

Funding Statement

This project was funded by US National Institutions of Health grants K08 AI143968-01 (to J.E.W.) and R01 DK105129 and P30 DK056338 (to J.C.M.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.IHME. Ascariasis—Level 4 Causes 2019. [cited 2019]. Available from: http://www.healthdata.org/results/gbd_summaries/2019/ascariasis-level-4-cause. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hotez PJ, Bundy DA, Beegle K, Brooker S, Drake L, de Silva N, et al. Helminth infections: soil-transmitted helminth infections and schistosomiasis. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries 2nd edition. 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Weatherhead JE, Hotez PJ. Worm Infections in Children. Pediatrics in review. 2015;36(8):341–52; quiz 53. doi: 10.1542/pir.36-8-341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.da Silva TE, Barbosa FS, Magalhães LM, Gazzinelli-Guimarães PH, Dos Santos AC, Nogueira DS, et al. Unraveling Ascaris suum experimental infection in humans. Microbes and Infection. 2021;23(8):104836. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2021.104836 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Betson M, Nejsum P, Bendall RP, Deb RM, Stothard JR. Molecular epidemiology of ascariasis: a global perspective on the transmission dynamics of Ascaris in people and pigs. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2014;210(6):932–41. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.CDC. Parasites—Ascariasis 2015. [cited 2016 21st November]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/parasites/ascariasis/biology.html. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jia T-W, Melville S, Utzinger J, King CH, Zhou X-N. Soil-transmitted helminth reinfection after drug treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2012;6(5):e1621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001621 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sanchez-Vegas C, Villavicencio KLH. Helminth Infections in Children. Pediatrics In Review. 2022;43(5):243–55. doi: 10.1542/pir.2020-001347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wu Y, Li E, Knight M, Adeniyi-Ipadeola G, Song L-z, Burns AR, et al. Transient Ascaris suum larval migration induces intractable chronic pulmonary disease and anemia in mice. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2021;15(12):e0010050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Weatherhead JE, Porter P, Coffey A, Haydel D, Versteeg L, Zhan B, et al. Ascaris larval infection and lung invasion directly induce severe allergic airway disease in mice. Infection and immunity. 2018;86(12). doi: 10.1128/IAI.00533-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rigter I, Schipper H, Koopmans R, Van Kan H, Frijlink H, Kager P, et al. Relative bioavailability of three newly developed albendazole formulations: a randomized crossover study with healthy volunteers. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2004;48(3):1051–4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.3.1051-1054.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jenkins DC. Observations on the early migration of the larvae of Ascaris suum Goeze, 1782 in white mice. Parasitology. 1968;58(2):431–40. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000069456 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Douvres FW, Tromba FG, Malakatis GM. Morphogenesis and migration of Ascaris suum larvae developing to fourth stage in swine. The Journal of parasitology. 1969:689–712. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gaafar S, Keittevuti B. Experimental induction of esophagogastric ulcers with inoculations of Ascaris suum eggs in swine. Gastroenterology. 1972;63(3):423–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gazzinelli-Guimarães PH, Gazzinelli-Guimarães AC, Silva FN, Mati VLT, de Carvalho Dhom-Lemos L, Barbosa FS, et al. Parasitological and immunological aspects of early Ascaris spp. infection in mice. International journal for parasitology. 2013;43(9):697–706. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.02.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sáenz JB, Mills JC. Acid and the basis for cellular plasticity and reprogramming in gastric repair and cancer. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2018;15(5):257–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Goldenring JR, Mills JC. Cellular plasticity, reprogramming, and regeneration: metaplasia in the stomach and beyond. Gastroenterology. 2021. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.10.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hoffmann W. Self-Renewal and Cancers of the Gastric Epithelium: An Update and the Role of the Lectin TFF1 as an Antral Tumor Suppressor. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022;23(10):5377. doi: 10.3390/ijms23105377 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sakata R. Studies on chitin. I. Investigations on-the infra-red spectra of chitin of pig Ascaris egg. Japanese Journal of Parasitology. 1963;12(5):387–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sromova D, Lýsek H. Visualization of chitin-protein layer formation in Ascaris lumbricoides egg-shells. Folia Parasitologica. 1990;37(1):77–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Goedken ER, O’Brien RF, Xiang T, Banach DL, Marchie SC, Barlow EH, et al. Functional comparison of recombinant acidic mammalian chitinase with enzyme from murine bronchoalveolar lavage. Protein expression and purification. 2011;75(1):55–62. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2010.08.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tabata E, Kashimura A, Wakita S, Ohno M, Sakaguchi M, Sugahara Y, et al. Protease resistance of porcine acidic mammalian chitinase under gastrointestinal conditions implies that chitin-containing organisms can be sustainable dietary resources. Scientific reports. 2017;7(1):1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Paoletti MG, Norberto L, Damini R, Musumeci S. Human gastric juice contains chitinase that can degrade chitin. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism. 2007;51(3):244–51. doi: 10.1159/000104144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ohno M, Kimura M, Miyazaki H, Okawa K, Onuki R, Nemoto C, et al. Acidic mammalian chitinase is a proteases-resistant glycosidase in mouse digestive system. Scientific reports. 2016;6(1):1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Boot RG, Blommaart EF, Swart E, Ghauharali-van der Vlugt K, Bijl N, Moe C, et al. Identification of a novel acidic mammalian chitinase distinct from chitotriosidase. Journal of biological chemistry. 2001;276(9):6770–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M009886200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Engevik AC, Kaji I, Goldenring JR. The physiology of the gastric parietal cell. Physiological reviews. 2020;100(2):573–602. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00016.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chen L, Shen Z, Wu J. Expression, purification and in vitro antifungal activity of acidic mammalian chitinase against Candida albicans, Aspergillus fumigatus and Trichophyton rubrum strains. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology: Experimental dermatology. 2009;34(1):55–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2008.03092.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Saenz JB, Burclaff J, Mills JC. Modeling murine gastric metaplasia through tamoxifen-induced acute parietal cell loss. Gastrointestinal Physiology and Diseases: Springer; 2016. p. 329–39. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3603-8_28 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Huh WJ, Khurana SS, Geahlen JH, Kohli K, Waller RA, Mills JC. Tamoxifen induces rapid, reversible atrophy, and metaplasia in mouse stomach. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(1):21–4. e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.09.050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gremlich H-U, Martínez V, Kneuer R, Kinzy W, Weber E, Pfannkuche H-J, et al. Noninvasive assessment of gastric emptying by near-infrared fluorescence reflectance imaging in mice: pharmacological validation with tegaserod, cisapride, and clonidine. Molecular Imaging. 2004;3(4):15353500200404127. doi: 10.1162/15353500200404127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Daraghmeh NH, Chowdhry BZ, Leharne SA, Al Omari MM, Badwan AA. Chapter 2—Chitin. In: Brittain HG, editor. Profiles of Drug Substances, Excipients and Related Methodology. 36: Academic Press; 2011. p. 35–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sakai H, Fujii T, Takeguchi N. Proton-potassium (H+/K+) ATPases: Properties and roles in health and diseases. The Alkali Metal Ions: Their Role for Life: Springer; 2016. p. 459–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Van Dyken SJ, Locksley RM. Chitins and chitinase activity in airway diseases. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2018;142(2):364–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.06.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lysek H, Malinsky J, Janisch R. Ultrastructure of eggs of Ascaris lumbricoides Linnaeus, 1758. I. Egg-shells. Folia Parasitologica. 1985;32(4):381–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wharton D. Nematode egg-shells. Parasitology. 1980;81(2):447–63. doi: 10.1017/s003118200005616x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gamble HR, Fetterer RH, Urban JF Jr. Reproduction and development in helminths. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Parasites: Elsevier; 1995. p. 289–305. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.CDC. Toxocariasis 2019. [cited 2019 9th July]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/dpdx/toxocariasis/index.html. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.CDC. Trichuriasis 2017. [cited 2017 19th December]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/dpdx/trichuriasis/index.html. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Vannella KM, Ramalingam TR, Hart KM, de Queiroz Prado R, Sciurba J, Barron L, et al. Acidic chitinase primes the protective immune response to gastrointestinal nematodes. Nature immunology. 2016;17(5):538–44. doi: 10.1038/ni.3417 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sutherland TE, Andersen OA, Betou M, Eggleston IM, Maizels RM, van Aalten D, et al. Analyzing airway inflammation with chemical biology: dissection of acidic mammalian chitinase function with a selective drug-like inhibitor. Chemistry & biology. 2011;18(5):569–79. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.02.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ohno M, Togashi Y, Tsuda K, Okawa K, Kamaya M, Sakaguchi M, et al. Quantification of chitinase mRNA levels in human and mouse tissues by real-time PCR: species-specific expression of acidic mammalian chitinase in stomach tissues. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e67399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067399 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Poddar U. Helicobacter pylori: a perspective in low-and middle-income countries. Paediatrics and International Child Health. 2019;39(1):13–7. doi: 10.1080/20469047.2018.1490100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Pomari E, Ursini T, Silva R, Leonardi M, Ligozzi M, Angheben A. Concomitant Infection of Helicobacter pylori and Intestinal Parasites in Adults Attending a Referral Centre for Parasitic Infections in North Eastern Italy. Journal of clinical medicine. 2020;9(8):2366. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Krzyzek P, Gosciniak G. Frequency and immunological consequences of Helicobacter pylori and intestinal parasite co-infections: a brief review. Annals of Parasitology. 2017;63(4). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sáenz JB, Vargas N, Mills JC. Tropism for spasmolytic polypeptide-expressing metaplasia allows Helicobacter pylori to expand its intragastric niche. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(1):160–74. e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.09.050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Weatherhead JE, Hotez PJ, Mejia R. The global state of helminth control and elimination in children. Pediatric clinics. 2017;64(4):867–77. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2017.03.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Holland C. The long and winding road of Ascaris larval migration: the role of mouse models. Parasitology. 2021:1–9. doi: 10.1017/S0031182021000366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sapoznikov A, Gal Y, Falach R, Sagi I, Ehrlich S, Lerer E, et al. Early disruption of the alveolar-capillary barrier in a ricin-induced ARDS mouse model: neutrophil-dependent and-independent impairment of junction proteins. American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology. 2019;316(1):L255–L68. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00300.2018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Segawa K, Nakazawa S, Tsukamoto Y, Chujoh C, Yamao K, Hase S. Effect of omeprazole on gastric acid secretion in rat: evaluation of dose, duration of effect, and route of administration. Gastroenterologia Japonica. 1987;22(4):413–8. doi: 10.1007/BF02773807 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Czuprynski C, Faith N. Sodium bicarbonate enhances the severity of infection in neutropenic mice orally inoculated with Listeria monocytogenes EGD. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 2002;9(2):477–81. doi: 10.1128/cdli.9.2.477-481.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Porter PC, Roberts L, Fields A, Knight M, Qian Y, Delclos GL, et al. Necessary and sufficient role for T helper cells to prevent fungal dissemination in allergic lung disease. Infection and immunity. 2011;79(11):4459–71. doi: 10.1128/IAI.05209-11 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3257943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wu Y, Zeng Z, Guo Y, Song L, Weatherhead JE, Huang X, et al. Candida albicans elicits protective allergic responses via platelet mediated T helper 2 and T helper 17 cell polarization. Immunity. 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.08.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011930.r001

Decision Letter 0

Aaron R Jex

17 Dec 2023

Dear Dr. Weatherhead,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Host Gastric Corpus Microenvironment Facilitates Ascaris Suum Larval Hatching And Infection in a Murine Model" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic. Based on the reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Aaron R. Jex

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Aaron Jex

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: This is an interesting work providing a comprehensive study of Ascaris larval hatching in a murine model. Overall, this is a well-written manuscript. The experimental design has been conducted in a logically manner. The results are robust, and the discussion of the contradiction finding with previous canonical model is appropriate. Such study will clearly add significantly to the existing scientific knowledge of Ascaris biology. I have a few minor suggestions for authors to consider:

Please add page and line numbers in the manuscript.

There appears to be errors in citation in the Result section. For example, “Previously, we have reported … with allergic airway disease.”

1.5 to 2 um” μm

“The role of AMCase in helminth immunity … during chronic infection.” References are needed.

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Tao Wang

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

References

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article's retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011930.r003

Decision Letter 1

Aaron R Jex

21 Jan 2024

Dear Dr. Weatherhead,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Host Gastric Corpus Microenvironment Facilitates Ascaris Suum Larval Hatching And Infection in a Murine Model' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Aaron R. Jex

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Aaron Jex

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011930.r004

Acceptance letter

Aaron R Jex

2 Feb 2024

Dear Dr. Weatherhead,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Host Gastric Corpus Microenvironment Facilitates Ascaris Suum Larval Hatching And Infection in a Murine Model," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Intestine of mice post Ascaris larva infection.

    Wildtype mice were oral gavaged with 2,500 Ascaris eggs and euthanized at 12 hours, 24 hours or 4 days post infection. H&E staining were carried out on sections of different intestine tissues.

    (PDF)

    pntd.0011930.s001.pdf (4.4MB, pdf)
    S2 Fig. Pepsin does not induce Ascaris larva hatching.

    Ascaris eggs are treated with 4 or 8 μg/ml of pepsin in pH = 2 overnight. Larvae hatched from the eggs were counted and hatch rate was calculated.

    (PDF)

    pntd.0011930.s002.pdf (488.4KB, pdf)
    S3 Fig. Ascaris larva does not hatch in intestinal conditions.

    Ascaris eggs were treated in pH = 2 for 30 minutes and then in different intestinal conditions overnight. Larval hatch rate was then calculated.

    (PDF)

    pntd.0011930.s003.pdf (257.3KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Review comments.docx

    pntd.0011930.s004.docx (12.1KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its supporting information files.


    Articles from PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES