Skip to main content
Light, Science & Applications logoLink to Light, Science & Applications
. 2024 Feb 20;13:53. doi: 10.1038/s41377-024-01397-2

Non-interleaved chiral metasurfaces and neural networks enhance the spatial resolution of polarimetry

Jaewon Jang 1,2, Minsu Park 1,2, Yeonsang Park 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC10879079  PMID: 38378579

Abstract

Non-interleaved chiral metasurfaces for high-spatial-resolution polarimetry are proposed and demonstrated. Furthermore, a convolutional neural network is incorporated to analyze interferometric images with the polarization state of light, and it results in accurate Stokes parameters.

Subject terms: Metamaterials, Imaging and sensing


Polarimetry using non-interleaved chiral metasurfaces shows high spatial resolution with the help of convolutional neural networks.

graphic file with name 41377_2024_1397_Figa_HTML.jpg


Analyzing the polarization of light provides a wealth of information beyond the structure and composition of materials. Currently, polarization analysis methods, including polarization spectroscopy, ellipsometry, and chiral sensing, are widely employed in numerous fields of photonics. However, achieving precise polarization measurements in many applications requires the integration of numerous optical components, inevitably leading to bulky measurement systems and increased costs1,2.

On the other hand, utilizing a polarimetry based on metasurfaces offers the potential to significantly reduce the size of polarization measurement systems3–5. Metasurfaces are arrays of nanostructures with subwavelength period that have the ability to modulate the amplitude, phase, and polarization of light6–8. Numerous groundbreaking metasurfaces have been demonstrated such as lenses9–11, beam generators12,13, quarter- and half-wave plates14,15,crcular polarization splitters16,17, holograms18 etc. Among these applications, metasurface-based polarimetry presents not only compact integration with other devices but also the possibility of versatile functions that conventional individual optical components can not achieve, sometimes even overcoming the inherent limitations of conventional optical elements19.

In previous studies on metasurface-based polarization measurement, various methods have been proposed. These include an in-line polarimeter using a single 2D array of rod antennas for the detection of polarization-selective directional scattering20, a technique that simultaneously measures diffraction contrasts of reflected light to determine the polarization state of incident light3, and polarization beam-splitting methods that characterize incident polarization states by measuring the intensities of refracted light spots21. In many cases, segmented-type metasurfaces22 or interleaved-type metasurfaces23 have been used to measure independent channels for light with different polarization states. These types of polarimetry are inevitable in spatial resolution decrease as the number of channels to be implemented increases.

In 2015, Arbabi et al.24 proposed metasurfaces that can completely control both phase and polarization by combining the dynamic phase and geometric phase, thus breaking the phase-spin coupling relationship. Similarly, Xu et al. demonstrated a polarization beam splitter by utilizing this spin-decoupled phase control method to split light at asymmetric angles25, and also showcased a vector beam generator26. On the other hand, Chen Chen et al. designed a spin-decoupled metasurface based on chiral meta-atoms and demonstrated spin-decoupled holographic imaging27. These chiral meta-atoms allow independent phase control without the need for structural rotation, as phase modulation relies solely on the geometric deformation of the structure. Therefore, independent phase control is achievable regardless of the orientation of the two spin lights. In a newly published paper in Light: Science & Applications, a polarimetry method based on this spin-decoupled chiral metasurface has been proposed and demonstrated28.

As illustrated in Fig. 1, Chen et al. designed a non-interleaved-type chiral metasurface where all meta-atoms can contribute to increase the efficiency of polarized light measurement, and demonstrated a method to measure the polarization state by simultaneously acquiring amplitude and phase information through interferometric techniques. Non-digitized measurement of polarization state of light using non-interleaved metasurfaces has advantages in efficiency because all incident light contributes to find out the Stokes parameters. Nevertheless, this method has difficulty in analyzing subtle and a little difference between triple interferometric intensities. By employing a convolutional neural network (CNN), they enhanced the capability of detecting the state of polarization (SoP) and achieved a high spatial resolution. The proposed polarimetry resultantly obtains information about the polarization state of incident light in the form of an image. Therefore, the CNN technique, which shows excellent performance in comparing and analyzing images, is very suitable for deriving Stokes parameters through non-digitized images. Recently, cutting-edge computing technologies such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning have been accelerating the advancement of nanophotonics29,30. Now, the successful integration of two high-tech technologies, CNN and non-interleaved chiral metasurfaces, has made it possible to realize a very small-sized device capable of precisely measuring the input polarization state with high spatial resolution. In the future, this is expected to provide a very small and lightweight platform for various advanced fields that should measure polarization state of light, and this work will open a new path for the emergence of several applications using the polarization information of light in daily life.

Fig. 1. Schematics of the proposed non-interleaved chiral metasurface for a polarimetry with high spatial resolution assisted by a convolutional neural network (CNN) analysis.

Fig. 1

(Left) 3D schematics of the non-interleaved chiral metasurfaces and images measured when light of different polarization states is incident. y-pol: vertical polarization, LCP left-hand circular polarization, LEP left-hand elliptical polarization. (Middle) Schematic diagram of CNN. (Right) Comparison of Stokes parameters measured with the proposed polarimeter and analyzed with CNN. Measured images reproduced from ref. 28

References

  • 1.Todorov T, Nikolova L, Tomova N. Polarization holography. 1: A new high-efficiency organic material with reversible photoinduced birefringence. Appl. Opt. 1984;23:4309–4312. doi: 10.1364/AO.23.004309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cincotti G. Polarization gratings: design and applications. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 2003;39:1645–1652. doi: 10.1109/JQE.2003.819526. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pors A, Nielsen MG, Bozhevolnyi SI. Plasmonic metagratings for simultaneous determination of Stokes parameters. Optica. 2015;2:716–723. doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.2.000716. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Arbabi E, Kamali SM, Arbabi A, Faraon A. Full-Stokes imaging polarimetry using dielectric metasurfaces. ACS Photonics. 2018;5:3132–3140. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b00362. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rubin NA, et al. Matrix Fourier optics enables a compact full-Stokes polarization camera. Science. 2019;365:eaax1839. doi: 10.1126/science.aax1839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yu N, et al. Light propagation with phase discontinuities: generalized laws of reflection and refraction. Science. 2011;334:333–337. doi: 10.1126/science.1210713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chen H-T, Taylor AJ, Yu N. A review of metasurfaces: physics and applications. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2016;79:076401. doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/79/7/076401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Khorasaninejad, M. & Capasso, F. Metalenses: Versatile multifunctional photonic components. Science358, eaam8100 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 9.Chen, X. et al. Longitudinal multifoci metalens for circularly polarized light. Adv. Opt. Mater.3, 1201–1206 (2015).
  • 10.Chen X, et al. Reversible three‐dimensional focusing of visible light with ultrathin plasmonic flat lens. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2013;1:517–521. doi: 10.1002/adom.201300102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chen WT, et al. Generation of wavelength-independent subwavelength Bessel beams using metasurfaces. Light Sci. Appl. 2017;6:e16259–e16259. doi: 10.1038/lsa.2016.259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yue F, et al. Vector vortex beam generation with a single plasmonic metasurface. ACS Photonics. 2016;3:1558–1563. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00392. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Xu H-X, Liu H, Ling X, Sun Y, Yuan F. Broadband vortex beam generation using multimode Pancharatnam–Berry metasurface. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2017;65:7378–7382. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2017.2761548. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yu N, et al. A broadband, background-free quarter-wave plate based on plasmonic metasurfaces. Nano. Lett. 2012;12:6328–6333. doi: 10.1021/nl303445u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dong Y, et al. Si metasurface half-wave plates demonstrated on a 12-inch CMOS platform. Nanophotonics. 2019;9:149–157. doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2019-0364. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Khorasaninejad M, Crozier KB. Silicon nanofin grating as a miniature chirality-distinguishing beam-splitter. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:5386. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wang B, et al. Rochon-prism-like planar circularly polarized beam splitters based on dielectric metasurfaces. ACS Photonics. 2017;5:1660–1664. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b01191. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wen D, et al. Helicity multiplexed broadband metasurface holograms. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:8241. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wei S, Yang Z, Zhao M. Design of ultracompact polarimeters based on dielectric metasurfaces. Opt. Lett. 2017;42:1580–1583. doi: 10.1364/OL.42.001580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mueller JB, Leosson K, Capasso F. Ultracompact metasurface in-line polarimeter. Optica. 2016;3:42–47. doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.3.000042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wen D, et al. Metasurface for characterization of the polarization state of light. Opt. Expr. 2015;23:10272–10281. doi: 10.1364/OE.23.010272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ding F, et al. Versatile polarization generation and manipulation using dielectric metasurfaces. Laser Photonics Rev. 2020;14:2000116. doi: 10.1002/lpor.202000116. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang X, et al. Direct polarization measurement using a multiplexed Pancharatnam–Berry metahologram. Optica. 2019;6:1190–1198. doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.6.001190. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Arbabi A, Horie Y, Bagheri M, Faraon A. Dielectric metasurfaces for complete control of phase and polarization with subwavelength spatial resolution and high transmission. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015;10:937. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2015.186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Xu Y, et al. Spin-decoupled multifunctional metasurface for asymmetric polarization generation. Acs Photonics. 2019;6:2933–2941. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.9b01047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Xu Y, et al. Generation of terahertz vector beams using dielectric metasurfaces via spin-decoupled phase control. Nanophotonics. 2020;9:3393–3402. doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2020-0112. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chen C, et al. Metasurfaces with planar chiral meta-atoms for spin light manipulation. Nano Lett. 2021;21:1815–1821. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chen C, et al. Neural network assisted high-spatial-resolution polarimetry with non-interleaved chiral metasurfaces. Light Sci. Appl. 2023;12:288. doi: 10.1038/s41377-023-01337-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yao K, Unni R, Zheng Y. Intelligent nanophotonics: merging photonics and artificial intelligence at the nanoscale. Nanophotonics. 2019;8:339–366. doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2018-0183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.So S, Badloe T, Noh J, Bravo-Abad J, Rho J. Deep learning enabled inverse design in nanophotonics. Nanophotonics. 2020;9:1041–1057. doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2019-0474. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Light, Science & Applications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES