Abstract
In this study, we propose a simple and efficient method to fabricate three-lobed nonspherical Janus microrobots. These microrobots can be actuated by a harmless magnetic field. Utilizing organosilica as the material of choice, we leverage its versatile silane chemistry to enable various surface modifications and functionalities. The fabricated microrobots demonstrate two distinct modes of motion, making them well-suited for cell transportation and drug delivery tasks. Their unique shape and motion characteristics allow for precise and targeted movement. Integrating these microrobots into therapeutic delivery platforms can revolutionize medical treatments, offering enhanced precision, efficiency, and versatility in delivering therapies to specific sites.
Keywords: microrobots, open-loop control, magnetic, therapeutic delivery
Introduction.
Untethered microrobots can deliver therapeutics in a minimally invasive manner [1], accessing otherwise unreachable areas of the human body [2, 3.] The potential applications of these microrobots in biomedicine are extensive, ranging from sensing [4-7], to drug delivery [8-10], and even regenerative medicine [11], etc. In particular, microrobots are highly suitable for cellular applications in regenerative medicine, as they can rapidly penetrate cells and achieve effective intracellular delivery [3]. Cell-based therapies, which aim to restore damaged or diseased tissues and organs [12] require precise transportation of cells to the targeted locations for transplantation [13, 14]. Any failure in cell delivery could result in a serious immune response [15]. Therefore, it is crucial to ensure accurate and noninvasive delivery of cells, where microrobots can play a vital role [16].
In recent years, the field of microrobotics has developed rapidly after the pioneering work reported by Ozin[17, 18], Sen[19, 20], and Mallouk[21, 22]. In particular, there have been several reports of microrobots transporting cells. Balasubramanian et al. [23] developed microengine rockets coated with antibodies that bind to antigens expressed by cancer cells. This approach allowed for the cells to be transported along a preselected path. Similarly, Gao et al. utilized a similar method for the transportation of circulating tumor cells [24]. Likewise, Sanchez et al. [25] developed chemically propelled microrobots that could be controlled magnetically, allowing for the selective loading, transportation, and delivery of multiple cells to specific locations in a fluid. However, all of the above-mentioned studies are based on chemically powered microrobots, which require high concentrations of toxic chemical fuel that can harm living cells [26]. As an alternative, magnetically actuated microbots have been developed for biological applications [27]. In the last decade, various research groups have developed magnetically actuated microrobots for cell delivery. Most of these microrobots were fabricated using direct laser writing or other sophisticated manufacturing technologies [28] which are not readily available to the wider research community.
Colloidal synthesis presents a simple and scalable fabrication technique that could be utilized for commercial production [29]. The initial investigations into microrobots have greatly benefited from colloidal synthesis, with a majority of synthesized microrobots being Janus colloids with spherical shapes [30]. While spherical Janus microrobots are promising for fundamental research [31], nonspherical Janus microrobots are highly preferred for practical applications [32]. However, the fabrication of non-spherical microrobots via colloidal synthesis is rare, primarily due to the difficulty in manufacturing such particles.
In the current work, we report the fabrication of three-lobed nonspherical Janus microrobots by using a bench-top colloidal synthesis route. The particles were coated with a nickel layer for a sharp magnetic response, thus giving them a nonspherical Janus characteristic. We demonstrate that these microrobots could be moved to a desired location by controlling them with a rotating magnetic field. Due to their unique shape, they offer promising cargo-carrying opportunities.
Magnetic setup.
Our experimental setup utilizes an electromagnetic manipulation system with rotating homogeneous magnetic fields. A Helmholtz coil system composed of six rings, assembled into three pairs, is optimized to achieve this. The coils are made of copper wires wrapped around the rings of three different sizes - small, medium, and large - and mounted on an inverted microscope. The medium and large coils are vertically mounted, while the small coils are horizontally mounted to avoid interference with the objective turret or condenser lens. The platform's dimensions are approximately 230 mm in length and 140 mm in width. Our design enables precise control of the rotating magnetic fields, making it easier to manipulate biological samples during experiments. The magnetic setup components, including the platform, slide arm, and coils, were 3D printed with PLA on an Ender 3 Pro machine. After applying a 1 A current, a uniform magnetic field of 2 mT for each of the medium and large ring pairs and 4 mT for the small ring pair was generated. The coils were connected to a motherboard for power and controlled wirelessly by a tablet computer connected to an X-box joystick, as shown in Fig. 1b. This setup allowed for precise control of the magnetic field direction during microrobotic manipulation.
Our team developed a Python-based graphical user interface using Tkinter and Gpiozero libraries. This user-friendly interface can accurately control the current in each coil, allowing for the application of constant magnetic fields in a user-defined direction. The user inputs the desired magnetic field direction and strength, which are converted into their corresponding x and y components. The current sent through the x and y coils is then adjusted proportionally to achieve the desired magnetic field strength. To enhance field strength, the software simultaneously sends an opposite polarity signal to the oppositely facing coil. The device is controlled via a wireless USB gaming controller, with the left joystick used for 360° orientation control and the right joystick for adjusting the magnetic field direction of a rolling microrobot. The rotating magnetic field can be generated in any user-defined direction by applying a time-varying sine wave to each of the X, Y, and Z-axis coils using following equations.
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
where is the azimuthal angle from the Z-axis, is the polar angle from the Y-axis, A is the magnetic field magnitude, and is the frequency that controls the speed of the rolling microrobot. By default, an azimuthal angle of 90° was set, and the polar angle could be adjusted to steer the direction of the rolling microrobot.
We optimized the magnetic setup for microrobotic manipulation and investigated the motion of our nonspherical Janus microrobots. We synthesized these microrobots using a modified procedure developed by Sacanna et al. [33], where we used magnetic polystyrene microspheres as seed particles for the heterogeneous nucleation of a polymerizable oil (TPM) onto them. (Synthesis procedure is given in the supplementary information). We employed sonication to ensure most of the particles were singlets and then rapidly injected hTPM into the solution. Under basic conditions, TPM undergoes hydrolysis and deprotonation, resulting in the formation of organosilica [34]. The clear suspension turned milky-white within a few minutes of injection. Heterogeneous nucleation of silica onto the seed particles was observed under an optical microscope until the desired morphology was achieved. Optical bright field and SEM images are provided in Fig. 2.
Results and Discussions.
When a microparticle with an embedded magnetic component is placed in a magnetic field, it experiences a magnetic force given by:
(4) |
Where is the magnetic field and is the magnetization or the magnetic moment of the particle. The particle also experiences a magnetic torque which can be predicted from the following equation:
(5) |
When the magnetic field is turned on, the magnetic moment of the particles aligns itself with the external magnetic field. By changing the direction of the applied magnetic field, the magnetic moment alignment also changes which offers a fundamental tool to control motion at the nanoscale. Equation 5 implies that by rotating the applied magnetic field in a certain direction by a certain angle will rotate a magnetized particle until the magnetic moment is aligned with the new direction of the magnetic field [35].
In order to manipulate the three-lobed nonspherical Janus microrobots, we utilized a rotating magnetic field. It was observed that these microrobots were inactive in the absence of a magnetic field. However, once the magnetic field was turned on, the microrobots aligned themselves with the applied magnetic field. By controlling the direction of the magnetic field using an X-box controller, we were able to move the microrobots in the desired directions. This rolling motion of the mickey mouse shaped microrobots is depicted schematically in Fig. 3.
It is interesting to note that the seed particles used for the fabrication of these microrobots are magnetic, which allows for the microrobots to respond to the magnetic field without any additional metal coating. However, we found that the response was much weaker for the uncoated particles. This may be due to the increased weight of the microrobots as a result of the three large organosilica lobes. In contrast, the nickel-coated particles showed a sharp response to the rotating magnetic field (as shown in Fig. 4a and video S1). Therefore, we performed all experiments on the nickel-coated microrobots.
In the absence of a magnetic field, the three-lobed nonspherical Janus microrobots displayed Brownian motion. However, the microrobots exhibited a clear response as soon as the magnetic field was applied. The magnetic moment of the microrobots aligned themselves to the magnetic field, which was captured and recorded by a microscope-attached camera. Video S1 and Fig. 4a demonstrate the magnetic response of the microrobots.
We used a rotating magnetic field and an Xbox controller to move the microrobots in the desired direction. By changing the direction of the magnetic field, the microrobots were moved in different directions. The microrobots were moved towards the upper right corner of the screen (Fig. 4a, 5 s), bottom right corner (Fig. 4a, 13 s), and upper left corner (Fig. 4a, 16 s) at a frequency of 2 Hz. The motion experiments of these microrobots were conducted at this frequency.
Apart from the translational motion, the microrobots also demonstrated a rotational motion along a fixed axis, which was achieved by changing the angle of the applied magnetic field. The rotational motion is displayed in Fig. 4b and video S2.
To ensure the reliability and reproducibility of our experimental results, we took several measures. First, we carefully optimized the magnetic setup for microrobotic manipulation, considering factors such as the strength and directionality of the magnetic field. We thoroughly calibrated our instruments and equipment to minimize any potential sources of error. Furthermore, we conducted multiple replicates of our experiments to assess the consistency of the observed phenomena. We found that both the chemical synthesis of the three-lobed microrobots and their magnetic manipulation was highly reproducible.
Conclusions.
In conclusion, we have successfully produced three-lobed nonspherical Janus microrobots that can be controlled by a magnetic field, exhibiting both translational and rotational motion. This was achieved through a process of heterogeneous nucleation and polymerization of organosilica precursor onto commercially available magnetic polystyrene microspheres. The unique shape and movement of these microrobots make them an exciting prospect for applications in therapeutic delivery. For example, by attaching or encapsulating cells onto the surface of the microrobots, they can transport cells to desired locations within the body. This can be particularly useful in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering, where the precise placement of cells is crucial for successful tissue repair or organ regeneration. We are currently exploring the potential of these microrobots for drug and cell delivery purposes.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgment.
This work is supported by an Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the NIGMS of the National Institutes of Health under grant number U54-GM104941, from the NIGMS of the National Institute of Health under grant number 1R35GM147451, from the National Science Foundation under grant number 2020973 and under grant number 2218980.
References
- 1.Nelson BJ, Kaliakatsos IK, and Abbott JJ, Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 12, 55 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Choi J, Hwang J, Kim J.-y., and Choi H, Advanced Healthcare Materials 10, 2001596 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 3.Venugopalan PL, Esteban-Fernández de Ávila B, Pal M, Ghosh A, and Wang J, ACS Nano 14, 9423 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shukla AK, Bhandari S, and Dey KK, Materials Today Communications 28, 102504 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sitti M, Ceylan H, Hu W, Giltinan J, Turan M, Yim S, and Diller E, Proceedings of the IEEE 103, 205 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Maria-Hormigos R, Jurado-Sánchez B, and Escarpa A, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 414, 7035 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shukla AK, Bhatia D, and Dey KK, ACS Applied Nano Materials 6, 8017 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 8.Song X, et al. , Advanced Materials 34, 2204791 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 9.Park S and Yossifon G, ACS Sensors 5, 936 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Luo M, Feng Y, Wang T, and Guan J, Advanced Functional Materials 28, 1706100 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li J, et al. , Science Robotics 3, eaat8829 (2018).33141689 [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mao AS and Mooney DJ, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112, 14452 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hoang DM, et al. , Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 7, 272 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yu NH, et al. , Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine 15, 639 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Beachy PA, Karhadkar SS, and Berman DM, Nature 432, 324 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chen W, Zhou H, Zhang B, Cao Q, Wang B, and Ma X, Advanced Functional Materials 32, 2110625 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ozin GA, Manners I, Fournier-Bidoz S, and Arsenault A, Advanced Materials 17, 3011 (2005). [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fournier-Bidoz S, Arsenault AC, Manners I, and Ozin GA, Chemical Communications, 441 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Paxton WF, Sen A, and Mallouk TE, Chemistry – A European Journal 11, 6462 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kline TR, Paxton WF, Mallouk TE, and Sen A, Angew Chem Intl Ed 44, 744 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Paxton WF, Kistler KC, Olmeda CC, Sen A, Angelo S. K. St., Cao Y, Mallouk TE, Lammert PE, and Crespi VH, J Am Chem Soc 126, 13424 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Paxton WF, Sundararajan S, Mallouk TE, and Sen A, Angew Chem Intl Ed 45, 5420 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Balasubramanian S, et al. , Angew Chem Intl Ed 50, 4161 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gao W and Farokhzad OC, Angew Chem Intl Ed 50, 7220 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sanchez S, Solovev AA, Schulze S, and Schmidt OG, Chemical Communications 47, 698 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sánchez S, Soler L, and Katuri J, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 54, 1414 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sitti M and Wiersma DS, Advanced Materials 32, 1906766 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li J and Pumera M, Chemical Society Reviews 50, 2794 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pu Y, Cai F, Wang D, Wang J-X, and Chen J-F, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 57, 1790 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chen Q, Yan J, Zhang J, Bae SC, and Granick S, Langmuir 28, 13555 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jurado-Sánchez B, Pacheco M, Maria-Hormigos R, and Escarpa A, Applied Materials Today 9, 407 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sahari A, Headen D, and Behkam B, in 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, p. 6580 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sacanna S, Korpics M, Rodriguez K, Colón-Meléndez L, Kim S-H, Pine DJ, and Yi G-R, Nat. Commun 4, 1688 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.van der Wel C, Bhan RK, Verweij RW, Frijters HC, Gong Z, Hollingsworth AD, Sacanna S, and Kraft DJ, Langmuir 33, 8174 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hou MT, Shen H-M, Jiang G-L, Lu C-N, Hsu I-J, and Yeh JA, Applied Physics Letters 96, 024102 (2010). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.