Abstract
High performance X-ray detector with ultra-high spatial and temporal resolution are crucial for biomedical imaging. This study reports a dynamic direct-conversion CMOS X-ray detector assembled with screen-printed CsPbBr3, whose mobility-lifetime product is 5.2 × 10−4 cm2 V–1 and X-ray sensitivity is 1.6 × 104 µC Gyair–1 cm–2. Samples larger than 5 cm10 cm can be rapidly imaged by scanning this detector at a speed of 300 frames per second along the vertical and horizontal directions. In comparison to traditional indirect-conversion CMOS X-ray detector, this perovskite CMOS detector offers high spatial resolution (5.0 lp mm−1) X-ray radiographic imaging capability at low radiation dose (260 nGy). Moreover, 3D tomographic images of a biological specimen are also successfully reconstructed. These results highlight the perovskite CMOS detector’s potential in high-resolution, large-area, low-dose dynamic biomedical X-ray and CT imaging, as well as in non-destructive X-ray testing and security scanning.
Subject terms: Photonic devices, Sensors and biosensors
Biomedical X-ray imaging requires high spatial and temporal resolution of the detectors. Liu et al. report a screen-printed perovskite direct-conversion X-ray CMOS imager with a spatial resolution of 5 lp mm−1 and a speed of 300 fps for low-dose 2D radiography and 3D computed tomography imaging.
Introduction
Since its discovery in 1895, X-ray has been extensively used in many medical imaging applications such as the diagnoses and treatments of cardiovascular, pulmonary, and cancer diseases1,2. To provide high-quality images, usually, X-ray detectors with unique features such as high spatial resolution, rapid imaging speed, and remarkable low-dose imaging performance are highly desired3. Compared to the conventional indirect-conversion X-ray detectors made of scintillator materials4, the direct-conversion detectors made of semiconductor materials offer superior X-ray imaging performance. However, the semiconductors used in the current commercial direct-conversion X-ray detectors are less satisfactory for generic medical X-ray imaging purposes. For instance, the amorphous selenium (-Se)5 merely works at the low energy range ( <50 keV) due to its limited stopping power (Z = 34). The cadmium zinc telluride (CdZnTe)6 or cadmium telluride (CdTe)7 crystals have demonstrated its advancements in resolving high-energy ( >140 keV) X-ray photons, but the difficulty of growing large-scale CdZnTe/CdTe crystals makes it hard to directly manufacture large area X-ray detectors. In addition, the high cost also limits their wide spreads in medical X-ray imaging applications.
Recently, lead halide perovskites8–13 with high X-ray absorption, high charge carrier mobility μ and long carrier lifetime τ exhibit excellent capability in ultra-high sensitive X-ray detections. For instance, Kim et al. reported the possibility of X-ray imaging with thick CH3NH3PbI3 film on thin-film transistor (TFT) array11 in 2017. Regardless, the integration of perovskite film with pixelated array and the reduction of dark current are still challenging. In 2021, Deumel et al. developed a procedure to manufacture X-ray detector with soft-sintered CH3NH3PbI3 on TFT array14 by employing a grid structure to mechanically adhere the thick perovskite film. In 2022, Xia et al. prepared a TFT array via soft-pressing and in situ polymerization of multi-functional binder (TMTA) of the CH3NH3PbI3 film15. Such process improves the material quality and potentially reduces the dark current.
To fully harness the benefits of perovskites in developing high- performance direct-conversion X-ray detectors, essentially, the CMOS pixel arrays16 should be considered. CMOS arrays are dominant in consumer and prosumer imaging markets due to their distinct capabilities17–20 to capture images with high resolution, rapid readout speed, high sensitivity, and low noise. Usually, the pixel size of CMOS can be smaller than 5 μm. In addition, specialized electrical circuits can be designed and integrated into the CMOS pixels to suppress leakage dark current. Typically, the dark current response19 of CMOS and TFT is 200 and 2000, respectively, indicating that CMOS arrays offer superior noise immunity and lower power consumption21. To this end, CMOS arrays are ideal for developing cutting-edge perovskite X-ray detectors with unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution.
In this study, a direct-conversion X-ray CMOS imager made of inorganic CsPbBr3 thick film (>300 μm) is developed, as shown in Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1. The prototype detector is depicted in Fig. 1b. This CMOS array (72 × 72) has a pixel dimension of 83.2 µm. An electric field of 80 V mm−1 is applied to propel the X-ray stimulated electrons in the perovskite towards the signal collection electrode on top of each pixel. The radiographic image of a standard bar pattern (Model: Type 18-d, QUART GmbH, Germany) demonstrates that this CMOS detector can resolve fine structures above 5.0 lp mm−1 (Fig. 1c). Moreover, a charge sensitive amplifier (CSA) is designed in each pixel to reduce the dark current via an adjustable feedback resistance21 (Supplementary Fig. 2). As depicted in Fig. 1d, high gate voltages, denoted as Vt, are utilized to minimize the pixel responses (more details can be found in Supplementary Fig. 3) for large dark current signals that primarily originates from the perovskite.
Results
Material and film fabrication
The inorganic CsPbBr3 thick film was fabricated through screen printing process (Fig. 2a). First, the CsPbBr3 precursor paste was prepared by mixing CsBr and PbBr2 with equal molar mass in Dimethylformamide (DMF)/Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) polar solvent through planetary ball milling (see Methods for details). The viscosity of the precursor paste varied from 110 mPa s to 9458 mPa s as the DMSO population increased (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. 4). It was found that screen printing of CsPbBr3 thick film can be performed when the viscosity got higher than 1500 mPa·s with DMF/DMSO ≤ 4/6. In addition, the perovskite precursor pastes gradually changed from yellow to green with bright emission (Supplementary Fig. 5), indicating a transformation from three-dimensional CsPbBr3 to zero-dimensional Cs4PbBr622. Afterwards, the precursor was heated to evaporate the DMF/DMSO solvent and make the dissolved CsBr and PbBr2 precursors precipitated out to form the thick CsPbBr3 film (Supplementary Fig. 6). Results in Fig. 2c (and Supplementary Fig. 7) demonstrate that the DMF/DMSO ratio smaller than 3/7 would benefit the growth of thick CsPbBr3 films with enhanced crystallinity23. Regardless, excess DMSO (DMF/DMSO ≤ 2/8) may reduce CsPbBr3 crystallinity due to the mixing of Cs4PbBr6 component, which has a significantly lower carrier mobility24 and is harmful to the charge transportation and X-ray detection. Eventually, the precursor paste with DMF/DMSO = 3/7 and viscosity of 4101 mPa s were selected to screen print CsPbBr3 films with adjustable sizes, shapes and thicknesses, see Fig. 2d and Supplementary Figs. 8, 9. The crystallization of CsPbBr3 intermediates, which may impact the quality of the final CsPbBr3 film25, was investigated (Supplementary Fig. 10). The intermediate Cs(DMSO/ DMF)PbBr3 thick film was hot-pressed under 150 °C and 0.5 MPa to rearrange the perovskite grains and generate a dense and compact CsPbBr3 thick film with improved materials crystallinity and time-resolved photoluminescence (Supplementary Figs. 11−13. According to the space charge-limited current (SCLC) measurements, the obtained CsPbBr3 thick film exhibited a high charge carrier mobility up to 22.5 cm2 V−1 s−1 (Fig. 2e). The mobility-lifetime product was determined to be 5.2 × 10−4 cm2 V−1 (Fig. 2f). Specifically, the value of was estimated through a curve-fitting process using the Hecht formula with respect to the collected experimental data:
1 |
where denotes the saturated current, denotes the CsPbBr3 thickness, and denotes the bias voltage.
X-ray response measurements
The measured current density–voltage (J–V) curves of the CsPbBr3 detector are plotted in Fig. 3a. They showed rectifying behavior with low dark current, and the average dark-to-light current switch ratio is 219.86 with a maximum value of 1989.32 achieved at an electric field of 24 V mm−1. The time-resolved current densities of the CsPbBr3 detector were measured at varied dose rates from 686 to 4886 μGyair s−1 (Fig. 3b). As seen in Fig. 3c, this fabricated detector showed an ideal linear photocurrent response with respect to the X-ray dose rate. Quantitative liner regression analyses estimated that the CsPbBr3 detector had a sensitivity of 3293, 8093, 15891, 25948, and 46961 μC Gyair−1 cm−2 at electric fields of 40, 60, 80, 100, and 120 V mm−1, respectively. Within a certain range of bias voltage, the sensitivity of the detector increased proportionally (Supplementary Figs. 15, 16. The signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), defined as SNR = (Iphoto—Idark)/Inoise, were calculated (Fig. 3d). Results showed that the SNR decreased as the electric field increased. Assuming the minimum SNR = 3, the lower limit-of-detection (LoD) of the CsPbBr3 detector was found to be 102 nGyair s−1 at 40 V mm−1, 245 nGyair s−1 at 60 V mm−1, and 321 nGyair s−1 at 80 V mm−1, respectively (Fig. 3e and Supplementary Fig. 17). Unless otherwise stated, the comprehensive device performance of the detector was evaluated with sensitivity of 15891 μC Gyair−1 cm−2 and LoD of 321 nGyair s−1 at electric field of 80 V mm−1. To evaluate its stability, this CMOS detector was tested continuously over one-hour period. Results in Fig. 3f show a minor dark current drift of 5.2 × 10−5 nA mm–1 s–1 V–1 and a light current drift of 3.2 × 10−4 nA mm–1 s–1 V–1. Additional cycling tests were also performed by turning the incident X-ray beams on and off, and similar results were also obtained (Supplementary Fig. 18). The slight current drift might be caused by the field-driven ion-migration induced polarization in perovskite26. Low dimension and surface defect passivation strategy could be applied to restrain ion-migration, and thus enhancing the detector stability27,28. Additionally, the long-term irradiated CsPbBr3 film exhibits similar X-Ray diffraction analysis (XRD) and Photoluminescence (PL) spectra compared to the original sample (Supplementary Fig. 19), indicating good irradiation stability of the fabricated CsPbBr3 thick film.
2D radiographic and 3D tomographic imaging
Subsequent 2D and 3D X-ray imaging studies were performed with this perovskite dynamic CMOS detector on our benchtop system (Supplementary Figs. 20–22). Specifically, the detector was continuously scanned along the vertical and horizontal directions at a speed of 300 frames per second (fps), and 30 V external bias voltage (corresponds to 80 V mm−1 electric field) is applied to generate the most optimal image quality. It is found that the image resolution and image SNR get balanced under this condition (Supplementary Figs. 23, 24). Moreover, the response to square-wave X-rays demonstrated a rapid rise time of 2.5 ms and fall time of 2.8 ms (Supplementary Fig. 25), allowing for quick imaging of samples larger than 5 cm×10 cm. The 2D digital radiography (DR) imaging results of an anesthetic mouse are presented in Fig. 4a, b. The two-month old mouse was scanned under two different dose levels at 50 kVp tube voltage. To compare, the same mouse was also imaged with a commercial indirect-conversion scintillator (CsI:TI) based CMOS flat panel detector (Dexela 2329 NDT, Varex, USA). As seen from the zoomed-in region-of-interests (ROIs) in Fig. 4b, the skull, ribs and pelvis of the mouse can be clearly delineated on the DR images obtained from this direction-conversion perovskite CMOS detector, demonstrating better spatial resolution to the indirect CMOS detector. Moreover, our detector outperforms the indirect CMOS detector even with 50% less radiation dose, indicating its better capability for low-dose X-ray imaging. Additionally, a chicken drumette specimen was tomographically scanned to validate the 3D CT imaging performance of such perovskite CMOS detector (Fig. 4c). In total, 180 projections were acquired in a sequence by rotating the specimen continuously with two-degree angular interval (see Methods for details). CT images were reconstructed using the standard Feldkamp-Davis-Kress (FDK)29,30 algorithm with a Ramp filter. As seen in Fig. 4c, the bony structures and the tissues can all be clearly identified. A 1.0 mm thick tungsten plate (Supplementary Fig. 26) was imaged to calculate the modulation transfer function (MTF)31. In addition, the normalized noise power spectra (NPS)32 of the detector was also characterized (Supplementary Fig. 27). The measured MTF and NPS curves are plotted in Fig. 4d. The nearly flat NPS curve suggests minimal signal correlation (cross-talking) between neighboring pixels. More imaging results of different objects are available in Supplementary Figs. 28, 29.
In this study, a high-performance perovskite based direct-conversion X-ray CMOS imager was developed. Results demonstrated that the screen-printed thick CsPbBr3 film has a high μτ product of 5.2 × 10−4 cm2 V–1, a high X-ray detection sensitivity of 15891 µC Gyair–1 cm–2, and a low dose detection limit of 321 nGyair s–1. Experimental X-ray 2D imaging results demonstrate that this perovskite CMOS detector can achieve very high spatial resolution (5.0 lp mm−1, hardware limit is 6.0 lp mm−1) and low-dose (260 nGy) imaging performance. Moreover, 3D CT imaging was also validated with this detector at a fast signal readout speed33 of 300 fps.
The use of lead halide perovskites offers a promising blueprint for developing the next generation state-of-the-art X-ray detector with significantly enhanced spatial resolution, readout speed and low-dose detection efficiency. As a consequence, conventional medical X-ray imaging would become more gentle and safe in the near future. This technique is particularly promising for medical X-ray imaging applications such as dental imaging and breast imaging with a linear perovskite CMOS array or a large area perovskite CMOS flat panel.
Methods
Ethics Statement
The imaging experiments with a mouse in this study adhered to ethical guidelines set by the Regional Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments and the Care Regulations approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (SIAT-ACUC-231108-YGS-SZH-A2338) of Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. A black mouse (Strain: C57BL/6JNifdc; Stock #: 219; Age: 6-8 weeks; Gender: male) was procured from Beijing VENTOLIN Experimental Animal Technology Co., Ltd. Pentobarbital sodium salt (Sigma-Aldrich, 1% concentration, dosage of 150 µl per 20 g body weight) was administered via intraperitoneal injection to induce profound anesthesia (duration of 30 minutes) in the mouse 10 minutes prior to the X-ray imaging with the perovskite CMOS detector.
Materials
PbBr2 (lead bromide, 99%, Aladdin), CsBr (cesium bromide, 99.5%, Aladdin). Organic solvents including dimethyl formamide (DMF, AR, 99%) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, AR, 99%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Equivalent molar ratios of CsBr and PbBr2 made up to be 80 wt% were mixed into DMF/DMSO solvent, and then the mixture was grinded for 6 hours to obtain the viscous CsPbBr3 precursor paste for screen printing.
Device fabrications
The substrates (glass/ITO or CMOS) were cleaned with detergent, ultra-sonicated in acetone and isopropyl alcohol, and subsequently dried overnight in an oven at 100 °C. For the fabrication of SnO2 film, the colloidal SnO2 aqueous dispersion (15 wt%) was diluted using deionized water to 5 wt%, and the obtained SnO2 solvent was spin-coated on the substrate (4000 rmp, 40 s), which was annealing at 140 °C for 1 hour, to form an electron transport layer34. Next, the viscous CsPbBr3 precursor paste was screen-printed on the substrate for several times to obtain a CsPbBr3 precursor film with desired thickness. The CsPbBr3 precursor film was pre-heated at 100 °C for 10 min, resulting an intermediate CsPbBr3 thick film with trace amount of residual DMSO. Afterwards, such intermediate CsPbBr3 film was hot-pressed at 150 °C and 0.5 MPa for 10 min. The hot-pressed CsPbBr3 thick film was further heated at 150 °C for 30 min to obtain a complete CsPbBr3 thick film. At last, a carbon paste was screen-printed on top of CsPbBr3 thick film and then heated at 120 °C for 30 min to form a top carbon electrode.
CMOS array and signal readout
The CMOS array consists of 72 × 72 active pixels, a scan module, a switch array and a buffer (Supplementary Fig. 2). The analog signal of each pixel is transmitted through the switch array and the buffer. The switch array is controlled by the scan module. The rolling shutter readout scheme is adopted in the CMOS array and the maximum signal readout speed can be higher than 300 frames per second. The charge collection electrode, denoted as T, is an exposed top-most metal. Another top-most metal, denoted as G, covered by an insulation material is used to form a focused electric field to improve the charge collection efficiency. The readout circuit of each pixel contains a charge collection electrode, a charge sensitive amplifier (CSA) and a two-staged cascaded source follower. The charge collected by the collection electrode is fed into the CSA and then converted into a voltage signal. The gate voltage of the feedback transistor is adjusted according to the decay time of the CSA to maximize the output dynamic range.
Data acquisition
The signal readout circuit is composed of a chip binding board, a mixed signal converter board and a Field-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA, Xilinx kintex-7, AMD, USA) control board (Supplementary Fig. 22). The binding board carries a bare die of the CMOS array, and is connected with the mixed signal converter board through a pin header. Filtering capacitors are placed on the binding board to suppress noise. The single-end analog signal output from the CMOS array is fed into the mixed signal converter board and then converted to a differential signal to match the input of the analog-to-digital converter (ADS5282, TI, USA), which features a 12-bit digital resolution, a sampling rate of 65 MSps and an interface of the serialized Low Voltage Differential Signaling (LVDS) outputs. A 16-bit digital-to-analog converter (DAC8568, TI, USA) on the mixed signal converter board is designed to configure the bias voltages of the CMOS array. The mixed signal converter board is connected with the FPGA based control board through FPGA Mezzanine Card (FMC) connector. The FPGA is the core logic control in a scalable and minimum hardware including an Ethernet transceiver module, two Double-Data-Rate Three Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory (DDR3 SDRAM) module and a flash configuration module. The FPGA based control board receives the serialized data output from the analog-to-digital converter and transmits them to PC via Ethernet.
X-ray imaging and characterizations
The in-house-built X-ray CT imaging benchtop had a medical-grade X-ray tube (G-242, Varex, USA). The tube current was fixed at 12.5 mA during the continuous exposures. A beam collimator was utilized to regulate the beam shape. The fixed beam filtration was 1.5 mm aluminum. The distance between the X-ray source and the scanned object was 444.0 mm, and the distance between the X-ray source and the CMOS detector was 476.0 mm. The horizontal linear stage (LS12-X200, Hanjiang, China) had a travel distance of 200.0 mm, and the vertical linear stage (STS06-X20, Hanjiang, China) had a travel distance of 40.0 mm. For CT imaging, the object was scanned on a rotation stage (Model: URS100BCC, Newport, USA) by 360 degrees with two-degree interval. The MTF and NPS experiments were measured with RQA3 beam (50 kVp tube voltage, 10.0 mm aluminum filtration). The CMOS detector array was aligned with the X-ray source. The 1.0 mm thick tungsten (W) plate was tilted by 3.0 degrees on the detector surface.
Image correction and stitching
Gain correction (Supplementary Fig. 24) was performed before stitching the thousands of X-ray projections into a full DR projection image. In particular, the signals corresponding to the same location were added together and the signals from different locations were rearranged sequentially to obtain the final images.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the Shenzhen Basic Research Program (JCYJ20200109115212546, Y.G.), National Natural Science Foundation of China (12235006, X.S., 12027812, Y.G., 62004091, Y.L.), Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (JSGGKQTD20210831174329010, H.Z., ZDSYS20220527171406014, D.Liang), Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences (2021362, Y.G.).
Author contributions
Y.L., D.Li, W.L., and T.S. prepared the CsPbBr3 film and made the characterization measurements. C.G. and X.S. designed the CMOS array. X.Z., J.Z., M.W., and Y.G. performed the data acquisition and image analyses. Y.L., C.G., and Y.G. analyzed the results and wrote the manuscript. X.H., J.W., and H.H. prepared the measuring setup. Z.S., D.Liang, H.Z., and X.-F.Y. joined the final discussion. Y.G., X.S., X.-F.Y., and H.Z. supervised all the activities.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Pavao Andričević, Takumi Ikenoue, and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Data availability
All relevant data generated in this study are provided in the paper and its Supplementary Information/Source Data file. The source data has been deposited in Figshare database under the accession link of 10.6084/m9.figshare.24922572.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Yanliang Liu, Chaosong Gao.
Contributor Information
Xue-Feng Yu, Email: xf.yu@siat.ac.cn.
Hairong Zheng, Email: hr.zheng@siat.ac.cn.
Xiangming Sun, Email: xmsun@phy.ccnu.edu.cn.
Yongshuai Ge, Email: ys.ge@siat.ac.cn.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-024-45871-2.
References
- 1.Reck M, Rabe KF. Precision diagnosis and treatment for advanced non–small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;377:849–861. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1703413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.SCOT-Heart Investigators. Coronary CT angiography and 5-year risk of myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;379:924–933. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1805971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chin J, et al. Screening for lung cancer with low-dose CT—translating science into medicare coverage policy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015;372:2083–2085. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1502598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zhao W, Ristic G, Rowlands JA. X-ray imaging performance of structured cesium iodide scintillators. Med. Phys. 2004;31:2594–2605. doi: 10.1118/1.1782676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Stone MF, et al. The x-ray sensitivity of amorphous selenium for mammography. Med. Phys. 2002;29:319–324. doi: 10.1118/1.1449874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chen Z, Zhu Y, He Z. Intrinsic photopeak efficiency measurement and simulation for pixelated CdZnTe detector. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detect. Associated Equip. 2020;980:164501. doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2020.164501. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bellazzini R, et al. Chromatic X-ray imaging with a fine pitch CdTe sensor coupled to a large area photon counting pixel ASIC. J. Instrum. 2013;8:C02028. doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/8/02/C02028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wei H, et al. Sensitive X-ray detectors made of methylammonium lead tribromide perovskite single crystals. Nat. Photonics. 2016;10:333–339. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2016.41. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.He Y, Hadar I, Kanatzidis MG. Detecting ionizing radiation using halide perovskite semiconductors processed through solution and alternative methods. Nat. Photonics. 2022;16:14–26. doi: 10.1038/s41566-021-00909-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shrestha S, et al. High-performance direct conversion X-ray detectors based on sintered hybrid lead triiodide perovskite wafers. Nat. Photonics. 2017;11:436–440. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2017.94. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kim YC, et al. Printable organometallic perovskite enables large-area, low-dose X-ray imaging. Nature. 2017;550:87–91. doi: 10.1038/nature24032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Huang Y, et al. A-site cation engineering for highly efficient MAPbI3 single-crystal X-ray detector. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019;58:17834–17842. doi: 10.1002/anie.201911281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yakunin S, et al. Detection of X-ray photons by solution-processed lead halide perovskites. Nat. Photonics. 2015;9:444–449. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2015.82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Deumel S, et al. High-sensitivity high-resolution X-ray imaging with soft-sintered metal halide perovskites. Nat. Electron. 2021;4:681–688. doi: 10.1038/s41928-021-00644-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xia M, et al. Compact and large-area perovskite films achieved via soft-pressing and multi-functional polymerizable binder for flat-panel X-ray detector. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022;32:2110729. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202110729. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Laborde C, et al. Real-time imaging of microparticles and living cells with CMOS nanocapacitor arrays. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015;10:791–795. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2015.163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zentai, G. Comparison of CMOS and a-Si flat panel imagers for X-ray imaging. IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques. 1, 194–200 (2011).
- 18.Cao Q, et al. Modeling and evaluation of a high-resolution CMOS detector for cone-beam CT of the extremities. Med. Phys. 2018;45:114–130. doi: 10.1002/mp.12654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sheth NM, et al. Technical assessment of 2D and 3D imaging performance of an IGZO-based flat-panel X-ray detector. Med. Phys. 2022;49:3053–3066. doi: 10.1002/mp.15605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhao C, et al. Large area CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray detector for digital breast tomosynthesis: analysis, modeling, and characterization. Med. Phys. 2015;42:6294–6308. doi: 10.1118/1.4932368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gao C, et al. Topmetal-II: a direct charge sensor for high energy physics and imaging applications. J. Instrum. 2016;11:C01053. doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/11/01/C01053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang L, et al. Photoluminescence origin of zero-dimensional Cs4PbBr6 perovskite. ACS Energy Lett. 2020;5:87–99. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02275. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cao J, et al. Identifying the molecular structures of intermediates for optimizing the fabrication of high-quality perovskite films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138:9919–9926. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b04924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Akkerman QA, et al. Zero-dimensional cesium lead halides: history, properties, and challenges. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018;9:2326–2337. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Glushkova A, et al. Ultrasensitive 3D aerosol-jet-printed perovskite X-ray photodetector. ACS Nano. 2021;15:4077–4084. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c07993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Haruyama J, et al. First-principles study of ion diffusion in perovskite solar cell sensitizers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:10048–10051. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b03615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhuang R, et al. Highly sensitive X-ray detector made of layered perovskite-like (NH4)3Bi2I9 single crystal with anisotropic response. Nat. Photonics. 2019;13:602–608. doi: 10.1038/s41566-019-0466-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Song Y, et al. Elimination of interfacial-electrochemical-reaction-induced polarization in perovskite single crystals for ultrasensitive and stable X-ray detector arrays. Adv. Mater. 2021;33:2103078. doi: 10.1002/adma.202103078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Feldkamp LeeA, et al. Practical cone-beam algorithm. JOSA A. 1984;1:612–619. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.1.000612. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ge Yongshuai, et al. ADAPTIVE-NET: deep computed tomography reconstruction network with analytical domain transformation knowledge. Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 2020;10:415. doi: 10.21037/qims.2019.12.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Fujita Hiroshi, et al. A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 1992;11:34–39. doi: 10.1109/42.126908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tapiovaara MJ. SNR and noise measurements for medical imaging. II. Application to fluoroscopic X-ray equipment. Phys. Med. Biol. 1993;38:1761. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/38/12/006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.An Mangmang, et al. A low-noise CMOS pixel direct charge sensor, Topmetal-II. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detect. Associated Equip. 2016;810:144–150. doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2015.11.153. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Liu C, et al. Hydrothermally treated SnO2 as the electron transport layer in high-efficiency flexible perovskite solar cells with a certificated efficiency of 17.3% Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019;29:1807604. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201807604. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data generated in this study are provided in the paper and its Supplementary Information/Source Data file. The source data has been deposited in Figshare database under the accession link of 10.6084/m9.figshare.24922572.