Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2005 Apr 26;102(18):6502–6507. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502225102

A transcriptional response to singlet oxygen, a toxic byproduct of photosynthesis

Jennifer R Anthony 1, Kristin L Warczak 1, Timothy J Donohue 1,*
PMCID: PMC1088386  PMID: 15855269

Abstract

The ability of phototrophs to convert light into biological energy is critical for life on Earth. However, there can be deleterious consequences associated with this bioenergetic conversion, including the production of toxic byproducts. For example, singlet oxygen (1O2) can be formed during photosynthesis by energy transfer from excited triplet-state chlorophyll pigments to O2. By monitoring gene expression and growth in the presence of 1O2, we show that the phototrophic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides mounts a transcriptional response to this reactive oxygen species (ROS) that requires the alternative σ factor, σE. An increase in σE activity is seen when cells are exposed to 1O2 generated either by photochemistry within the photosynthetic apparatus or the photosensitizer, methylene blue. Wavelengths of light responsible for the generating triplet-state chlorophyll pigments in the photosynthetic apparatus are sufficient for a sustained increase in σE activity. Continued exposure to 1O2 is required to maintain this transcriptional response, and other ROS do not cause a similar increase in σE-dependent gene expression. When a σE mutant produces low levels of carotenoids, 1O2 is bacteriocidal, suggesting that this response is essential for protecting cells from this ROS. In addition, global gene expression analysis identified ≈180 genes (≈60 operons) whose RNA levels increase ≥3-fold in cells with increased σE activity. Gene products encoded by four newly identified σE-dependent operons are predicted to be involved in stress response, protecting cells from 1O2 damage, or the conservation of energy.

Keywords: σ factor, reactive oxygen species, Rhodobacter sphaeroides, photochemistry, carotenoids


Light energy captured by plants and microbial phototrophs provides O2 and the reducing power needed to assimilate atmospheric gases (CO2 and N2) into compounds used by humans, animals, and other heterotrophs. Although the ability to capture light energy is of great advantage to photosynthetic (PS) organisms, there are risks associated with this bioenergetic lifestyle. For example, the reactive oxygen species (ROS) singlet oxygen (1O2) is an inadvertent byproduct of energy transfer from excited triplet-state chlorophyll pigments in the PS apparatus to ground-state triplet oxygen (1-5). 1O2 is a strong oxidant that can destroy the integrity of membranes, abolish the function of many biomolecules, and reduce photochemical activity by inactivating enzymes of the PS apparatus (2, 6-12).

Carotenoids within the PS apparatus are known to quench 1O2 (2-4, 12), but the PS growth of cells lacking carotenoids suggests there are other mechanisms to protect cells from 1O2 damage (12-14). In the case of other ROS (superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, or hydroxyl radicals), transcriptional responses are critical in activating the expression of genes needed for survival (15, 16). We show that the facultative phototropic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides requires the alternative σ factor, σE, to mount a transcriptional response to 1O2. R. sphaeroides σE is a member of the extracytoplasmic function family (ECF) of alternative σ factors. The basal activity of σE is normally low, because it forms an inhibitory complex with a zinc-dependent anti-σ factor, ChrR (17-19).

Previous studies indicate there are transcriptional responses to conditions known or proposed to generate 1O2 in plants (20, 21), algae (22), and bacteria such as Escherichia coli (23) and Myxococcus xanthus (24). However, information is lacking on the transcription factors and function of genes that protect cells from 1O2. We found a 10- to 20-fold increase in activity from the R. sphaeroides ECF σ factor, σE, under conditions known to generate 1O2 (1, 2). We showed this σE-dependent transcriptional response is required for viability in the presence of 1O2 when cells contain low levels of carotenoids. In addition, we identified members of the σE regulon that include a heat-shock σ factor, RpoHII; a putative cyclopropane-fatty-acyl-synthetase, CfaS; a potential photolyase, PhrB; and several proteins of unknown function.

Methods

Bacterial Strains and Plasmids. R. sphaeroides 2.4.1 (WT), ΔChrR (chrR-1::drf), or TF18 (rpoEchrR-1::drf) was grown at 30°C in Sistrom's succinate-based minimal medium A (25). Media used for growth of strains containing low-copy lacZ reporter plasmids (17, 18, 26) was supplemented with 25 μg/ml kanamycin.

Growth Conditions. For aerobic respiratory growth, 500 ml of media was bubbled with a mixture of 69% N2/30% O2 and 1% CO2 in the dark. PS cultures were grown by bubbling 500-ml cultures with a mixture of 95% N2 and 5% CO2 in front of an incandescent light source (10 W/m2, as measured with a Yellow-Springs-Kettering model 6.5-A radiometer through a Corning 7-69, 620- to 110-nm filter).

To test the effects of 1O2, PS cultures were exposed to aerobic growth conditions (69% N2, 30% O2, and 1% CO2) in the presence or absence of light (10 W/m2). Where indicated, light was passed through a 1283 filter (Kopp Glass, Pittsburgh) that impedes >99% of light at wavelengths <770 nm but transmits >45% of light at 830 nm and >80% of light at 900 nm. When using methylene blue (Sigma-Aldrich) to generate 1O2, a final concentration of 1 μM was added to aerobic cultures in the presence or absence of incandescent light (10 W/m2). To test the effects of other ROS, 0.5 mM H2O2, 1 mM diamide, or 1 mM paraquat (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to aerobic cultures (27).

All experiments were initiated when cultures reached ≈2 × 108 colony-forming units per ml to minimize light or O2 limitation to PS and aerobic cells, respectively. To measure cell viability, samples were removed, diluted, and plated in media (25) supplemented with 25 μg/ml kanamycin to select for the rpoE P1::lacZ reporter plasmid. The whole cell abundance of carotenoids was measured as described (28).

Determining Promoter Activity. Promoter activity was determined by measuring β-galactosidase activity from low-copy rpoE P1::lacZ (17, 18) or trxA::lacZ reporter plasmids. The promoter for the thioredoxin gene [trxA, -214 to +27 relative to the known transcription initiation site (27)] was fused to lacZ (29) and mobilized into R. sphaeroides. β-Galactosidase activity (units/ml of culture) was calculated as follows: (A420 × 1,000)/[Cell volume in assay (ml) × time of assay (min)]. Culture density was typically monitored by measuring A600 in a BioSpec 1601 spectrophotometer (Schimatzu, Columbia, MD). The density of cultures treated with methylene blue was monitored at 500 nm, because this photosensitizer absorbs light between 609 and 668 nm. The differential rate of β-galactosidase synthesis was determined by calculating the slope from plots of enzyme activity (units/ml of culture) against optical density. All experiments were repeated a minimum of three times with differential rates of β-galactosidase synthesis typically deviating <2-fold between experiments.

Identification of σE Target Genes. Triplicate cultures of R. sphaeroides 2.4.1 and ΔChrR were grown aerobically to ≈2-3 × 108 colony-forming units/ml. RNA was isolated and cDNA was synthesized, labeled, and hybridized to R. sphaeroides GeneChip Custom Express microarrays [Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA (30, 31)]. After data extraction using Affymetrix mas 5.0 software, data sets were imported into genespring software (Silicon Genetics, Redwood City, CA) for normalization and analysis (Gene Expression Omnibus accession no. GSE2219).

Candidate σE promoters (extending ≈200 bp upstream of the predicted start of translation; Table 5, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site) were amplified from 20 ng of 2.4.1 chromosomal DNA in EasyStart PCR tubes (Molecular BioProducts, San Diego) with 2.5 units of Pfu Turbo (Stratagene). PCR products were cloned into a plasmid (pRKK96) containing a known transcriptional terminator for in vitro assays (32) or into a lacZ reporter plasmid (pRKK200) for determining activity in vivo (29). In vitro transcription assays with reconstituted R. sphaeroidesE were performed with 20 nM of plasmid DNA (19).

Results

Conditions That Generate 1O2 Within the PS Apparatus Increase R. sphaeroides σE Activity. Mutations that inactivate an early enzyme in carotenoid biosynthesis, CrtB, cause a small increase in σE activity (data not shown). Because carotenoids play a protective role against 1O2 (2-4, 12), we asked whether this toxic byproduct of photosynthesis directly affected σE activity.

To determine whether R. sphaeroides σE activity responds to 1O2, we monitored the differential rate of β-galactosidase synthesis from a σE-dependent rpoE P1::lacZ reporter fusion (17) after anaerobic PS cells were exposed to O2 in the presence of light. After this shift, cell growth continues at approximately the same doubling rate, because O2 is used as a respiratory electron acceptor (33). However, after this shift, the differential rate of β-galactosidase synthesis from the σE-dependent promoter increased ≈10-fold (from 6 to 65) when compared with a control culture grown under either steady-state PS (light in the absence of O2) or respiring (30% O2) conditions (Fig. 1 and Table 1). This transcriptional response was maintained throughout the experiment, suggesting that σE activity was sustained. There was a <2-fold increase in the differential rate of β-galactosidase synthesis from the rpoEP1::lacZ reporter fusion when PS cells were shifted to aerobic conditions in the dark (Table 1). This was expected, because little 1O2 is made under this condition due to the lack of light needed to produce triplet-state chlorophyll molecules. From these results, we concluded that the combination of light and O2, conditions known to generate 1O2 within the PS apparatus (1, 2), are required for this transcriptional response.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Conditions that generate 1O2 increase R. sphaeroides σE activity. Shown is β-galactosidase activity from a σE-dependent reporter gene in either steady-state cultures or after shifting cells from PS to aerobic conditions in the presence of light. The arrow indicates the time of shift. Shown are results from experiments where cells were exposed to white unfiltered light (light) or placed behind a filter to remove light ≥830 nm (>830-nm light).

Table 1. Differential rates of β-galactosidase synthesis from the σE-dependent rpoE::lacZ fusion under conditions that either do (+) or do not (−) generate 1O2.

Strain Growth 1O2 Rate
WT PS 6
WT Aero 8
WT PS→Aero + light + 65
WT PS→Aero (dark) 8
WT PS (>830 nm) 2
WT PS→Aero (>830 nm) + 35

PS, cells grown photosynthetically; Aero, cells grown by aerobic respiration (30% O2).

Control experiments indicated this response depended on σE, because the differential rate of a β-galactosidase synthesis from the rpoEP1::lacZ reporter fusion in a ΔσE mutant (<1 unit) did not increase upon exposure to 1O2. Cells lacking σE grow under these conditions, presumably because the carotenoids within the PS apparatus quench 1O2 (see below). In addition, it appears that 1O2 does not fully induce σE activity, because the differential rate of β-galactosidase synthesis from the rpoEP1::lacZ reporter fusion in WT cells exposed to 1O2 was 10-fold less than that seen in a strain lacking the anti-σ factor, ChrR (65 vs. 650).

Wavelengths of Light That Excite Chlorophyll Pigments Are Sufficient to Increase σE Activity. If production of 1O2 by the PS apparatus was responsible for this transcriptional response, then wavelengths of light known to generate triplet-state chlorophyll molecules within the light-harvesting complexes should increase σE activity. R. sphaeroides contains two light-harvesting complexes, B800-850 and B875, named for their absorption maxima in the near infrared (34-36). To determine whether light absorbed by the light-harvesting complexes could cause this response, we looked at the action spectrum of this transcriptional response. Under PS conditions with light that was filtered to remove wavelengths <830 nm, the differential rate of β-galactosidase synthesis from the σE-dependent promoter was ≈4-fold lower than that observed with cells grown in white light (Table 1), presumably because the cells grow slower when light <830 nm is removed. However, there was an ≈17-fold increase in the differential rate of β-galactosidase synthesis when cultures illuminated with >830-nm light were exposed to O2 (Table 1). The magnitude of this response was similar to that observed when PS cells were exposed to O2 and white light (≈17- vs. ≈10-fold, Table 1). Thus, wavelengths of light that excite the light-harvesting complexes are sufficient to increase σE activity.

Continued Exposure to Conditions That Generate 1O2 in the PS Apparatus Are Needed to Sustain This Response. The half-life of 1O2 in cells is <100 ns (37). We took advantage of the relatively short half-life of this ROS to further test whether σE activity was responding to 1O2. For example, if increased σE activity required 1O2, then placing PS cultures that had previously been exposed to O2 in the dark might terminate this transcriptional response. When PS cells were shifted to aerobic conditions in the presence of light, we saw the expected increase in the differential rate of β-galactosidase synthesis from the σE-dependent promoter (≈10-fold; Fig. 2 and Table 2). However, when this culture was placed in the dark (conditions that allow growth via respiration but prevent 1O2 formation), the differential rate of β-galactosidase synthesis decreased ≈9-fold (Fig. 2 and Table 2). In addition, placing the same culture back into the light to restore 1O2 formation caused an ≈8-fold increase in the differential rate of β-galactosidase synthesis from the σE-dependent promoter (Fig. 2 and Table 2), suggesting this transcriptional response to 1O2 is reversible, and that increased σE activity requires continued exposure to 1O2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Continued exposure to 1O2 is required for increased σE activity. Shown is β-galactosidase activity from the σE-dependent reporter gene when PS (PS) cells are shifted to aerobic conditions (Aero) in the presence or absence of light. Arrows indicate the time of each shift.

Table 2. Continued exposure to 1O2 is required for increased σE activity.

Growth 1O2 Rate
PS 7
Aero + light + 73
Aero dark 8
Aero + light + 63

PS, cells grown photosynthetically; Aero, cells grown by aerobic respiration (30% O2).

R. sphaeroides σE Activity Is Increased by Formation of 1O2 in the Absence of the PS Apparatus. If 1O2 was responsible for the observed σE transcriptional response, then other conditions that generate this ROS should also increase σE activity. To test this hypothesis, we asked whether generating 1O2 by illumination of methylene blue in the presence of O2 produced a similar response (1). When aerobically grown WT cells were exposed to 1 μM methylene blue in the presence of light and O2, cell growth continued (see below), and the differential rate of β-galactosidase synthesis from the rpoE P1::lacZ reporter fusion increased ≈20-fold compared with aerobic cells grown in the absence of methylene blue (Table 3). Control experiments indicated there was a <2-fold increase in the rate of β-galactosidase synthesis when aerobic cultures were exposed to methylene blue in the dark (Table 3). The lack of a comparable increase in σE activity in aerobic cells exposed to methylene blue in the dark is expected, because both light and O2 are required for this compound to generate 1O2 (38). For these experiments, cells were grown in the presence of 30% O2, a condition where pigment-protein complexes of the PS apparatus are not detectable (34). Therefore, we conclude that this transcriptional response to 1O2 can occur in cells that either contain or lack the PS apparatus.

Table 3. Light plus methylene blue increases σE activity.

Strain Growth 1O2 Rate
WT Aero 5
WT Aero + light 8
WT Aero + methylene blue + light + 151
WT Aero + methylene blue (dark) 8

Differential rates of β-galactosidase synthesis from the σE-dependent rpoE::lacZ fusion when WT cells are grown aerobically under conditions that either do or do not generate 1O2.

Other ROS Do Not Produce a Similar Increase in σE Activity. We recognize that the damaging effects of 1O2 on many biomolecules (1, 6, 38) could stimulate the formation of other ROS. To test whether other ROS could produce an increase in σE activity, we monitored the differential rate of β-galactosidase synthesis from a rpoE P1::lacZ reporter fusion in aerobic cells treated with concentrations of H2O2, paraquat (to stimulate superoxide formation), or diamide (to alter the oxidation-reduction state of the cytoplasmic thiol pool) previously shown to generate an oxidative stress response in R. sphaeroides (27). For these experiments, we also monitored the differential rate of β-galactosidase synthesis from a control trxA::lacZ reporter fusion, because the trx promoter has previously been shown to respond to oxidative stress in R. sphaeroides (27).

We found that addition of paraquat or H2O2 to aerobic cells produced increases in the differential rate of β-galactosidase synthesis from the trxA::lacZ reporter gene that are consistent with changes in abundance of trxA transcripts produced by these compounds in previous studies (Table 4) (27). However, the differential rate of β-galactosidase synthesis from the σE-dependent reporter fusion either decreased (paraquat) or increased no more than 1.2-fold (H2O2) when compared with untreated cells (Table 4). Any observed increase in σE activity in the presence of these ROS was below the 10-fold increase in σE activity seen when cells are exposed to 1O2. We did not monitor σE activity in the presence of diamide, because previous work has shown that σE activity does not increase upon exposure to this compound (39). Based on these results, we concluded that the transcriptional response observed when 1O2 is generated does not occur in the presence of other ROS.

Table 4. Other ROS do not increase σE activity.

Addition ROS rpoEP1::lacZ fusion trxA::lacZ fusion
None - 11 185
Paraquat Superoxide 6 450
H2O2 Peroxide 13 220
Diamide Oxidizes cysteine thiols 3 ND

Differential rates of β-galactosidase synthesis from the indicated promoters when WT cells are grown aerobically under conditions that either do or do not generate indicated ROS. ND, not determined.

σE Is Required to Respond to 1O2 When Carotenoids Are Low. Although cells lacking σE are unable to mount this transcriptional response to 1O2 (Fig. 1, Table 1), exponential growth of a ΔσE strain continues when a PS culture is shifted to aerobic conditions in the presence of light (data not shown). This occurs presumably because carotenoids within the PS apparatus quench 1O2 (2-4, 12). To assess the relative importance of carotenoids and σE in the presence of 1O2, we monitored the growth of cells that contain low levels of carotenoids in the presence and absence of σE. For this analysis, we grew cells by aerobic respiration (30% O2), because they have 20-fold less total carotenoids than PS cells grown at 10 W/m2 (≈10 μg of carotenoid/2 × 1010 cells compared with ≈200 μg of carotenoid/2 × 1010 cells, respectively). The use of aerobically grown cells is preferable to studying a carotenoid-minus ΔσE mutant, because the lack of carotenoids lowers PS growth rates (12-14).

Exponential growth of aerobically grown WT cells continued after exposure to 1O2 (Fig. 3A). In contrast, the number of colony-forming units per ml of the ΔσE mutant culture decreased ≈10-fold after 8 h of exposure to 1O2 (Fig. 3B). The bacteriocidal effect of 1O2 on the σE mutant when carotenoid levels are low shows that both σ factor activity and carotenoids are critical to viability in the presence of this ROS.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

1O2 is bacteriocidal to a ΔσE mutant when carotenoids are low. (A) Optical density measurements (OD500 nm) and (B) viable plate counts (colony-forming units/ml) when aerobically grown WT cells or cells lacking σE (ΔσE) were treated with methylene blue in the presence of light. The arrow indicates the time when methylene blue and light were added.

Additional Members of the σE Regulon. To identify genes that are part of this transcriptional response to 1O2, we compared RNA levels from aerobically grown (30% O2) WT cells with a ΔChrR mutant. ChrR inhibits σE activity (17-19), so we looked for RNA that was more abundant in the ΔChrR mutant. As expected, global gene expression analysis showed an increase (≈12-fold) in rpoE-specific RNA from cells lacking ChrR. It also showed that RNA from ≈180 genes (≈60 operons) was ≥3-fold more abundant in cells that contained increased σE activity (Table 5). In contrast, the ≈35-fold increase in cycA P3 activity that occurs in ΔChrR cells in vivo (17) causes only an ≈1.6-fold increase in total cycA-specific RNA (Table 5). The smaller increase in cycA-specific RNA levels reflects the fact that cycA contains additional strong promoters that are recognized by other σ factors (40, 41). This suggests that a global gene expression microarray approach might miss other σE-dependent genes that also contain multiple promoters.

To test whether any of these candidate operons contained a σE-dependent promoter, DNA upstream of the first gene in each of 28 potential operons was tested for transcription by reconstituted EσE (Table 6, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site) (17, 42). These operons were chosen either based on their increased levels of expression in cells with elevated σE activity or because of a potential role of their gene products in the PS apparatus (a source of 1O2). We found that rpoHII, which encodes one of two R. sphaeroides heat-shock σ factors (Rsp0601), is transcribed by EσE. Production of the rpoHII transcript is inhibited by addition of ChrR, as is the case with other σE-dependent promoters like rpoE P1 and cycA P3 (Fig. 4A). By these criteria, σE-dependent promoters are also located upstream of Rsp1087 (which may contain two promoters, because different-sized EσE transcripts are seen), Rsp1409, and Rsp2143 (Fig. 4A). Each gene is predicted to be part of a polycistronic operon that encodes uncharacterized proteins (see Discussion). The level of transcripts produced from the rpoHII, Rsp1087, and Rsp2143 promoters is comparable to that of rpoE P1 (within 1.1-fold), suggesting these four promoters are of similar strength. In contrast, the abundance of the σE-dependent transcript produced by Rsp1409 in vitro is comparable to the σE-dependent promoter, cycA P3, which has ≈80-fold less activity than rpoE P1 (17).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Identification of additional σE-dependent promoters. (A) Products of in vitro transcription reactions using reconstituted R. sphaeroidesE (17) and the indicated potential promoter. As an additional control to demonstrate the σE dependence of these transcripts, ChrR was added to indicated reactions (17-19). Note that the first four lanes were exposed to a phosphoscreen twice as long as the remainder of the gel to detect low-abundance transcripts from the cycA P3 and Rsp1409 promoters. Experiments were repeated at least three times, with a representative gel shown. The σE-dependent transcripts appear as two products due to termination at different bases within the SpoT 40 transcriptional terminator on the template used (32). (B) Activity of selected σE-dependent promoters in R. sphaeroides. Shown are β-galactosidase levels [Miller units (58)] from the indicated promoter fused to lacZ in WT cells (▪), ΔChrR cells (increased σE activity) (▧), or cells lacking both σE and ChrR (□). All assays were performed in triplicate, with bars denoting the standard deviation from the mean.

The same putative rpoHII and Rsp1087 promoter regions were fused to lacZ to test for σE-dependent activity in vivo. Expression was not detectable from these reporter fusions in WT R. sphaeroides cells, but it was comparable to that of rpoE P1 in cells lacking the anti-σ factor, ChrR (Fig. 4B). In addition, activity from the rpoHII and Rsp1087 promoters was not detectable in a σE mutant strain (Fig. 4B). This suggests that transcription from this promoter region depends solely on σE, as is the case for rpoE P1 (17).

The other 24 potential promoters tested (Table 6) produced no detectable σE-dependent transcripts in vitro. These results suggest that either no σE-dependent promoter is located within this region, or that another factor is required to produce a transcript at levels comparable to weak σE-dependent promoters like cycA P3 or the one upstream of Rsp1409. Reasons why the abundance of RNA from many potential σE-dependent genes was increased in cells lacking the anti-σ factor, ChrR, are presented in Discussion.

Discussion

The ability of plant and microbial phototrophs to convert light into biological energy is fundamental to life on Earth. However, the photochemical reactions that allow these organisms to conserve the energy in sunlight are also the source of 1O2. 1O2 is a strong oxidant that can cleave peptide and phosphodiester bonds, damage amino acids and nucleosides, oxidize unsaturated fatty acids, and damage other cellular components (2, 6-12). Although changes in expression of individual genes in response to 1O2 have been reported in plants (20, 21), algae (22), and bacteria, including E. coli (23) and M. xanthus (24), details on the targets or features of these transcriptional responses are lacking. In this work, we show that the PS bacterium R. sphaeroides mounts a transcriptional response to 1O2; that the alternative ECF σ factor, σE, is required for this response; and that σE is essential for viability in the presence of 1O2 when carotenoid levels are low.

One of the most common sources of 1O2 in biological systems is photochemistry within the PS apparatus (20). However, the formation of 1O2 by photosensitizers in organelles has been reported to alter nuclear gene expression (43), suggesting that cells have a signaling pathway to sense and respond to this ROS. We have shown that wavelengths of light sufficient to excite bacteriochlorophyll molecules within the light-harvesting complexes in the presence of O2, or the combination of light and a photosensitizer (methylene blue), can cause a sustained increase in σE activity. These results implicate R. sphaeroides σE as a member of a signal transduction pathway that responds to 1O2.

We have shown that σE activity increases under two conditions known to generate 1O2. However, under each of these conditions, the amount of σE activity is a fraction of that seen in cells lacking the anti-σ factor, ChrR. One possible explanation for this difference in σE activity is that the amount of 1O2 generated is insufficient to cause dissociation of all σE-ChrR complexes. Alternatively, the destruction of free σE by 1O2 could explain the difference in target gene expression between cells lacking ChrR and those exposed to this ROS.

During the preparation of this paper, it was reported that illumination of low-oxygen R. sphaeroides cells with blue light produces a transient increase in the abundance of many RNA species (42). Some of these genes were predicted to contain either heat shock or σE-dependent promoters by a bioinformatic analysis of intergenic regions (42). The authors show that exposure of low-oxygen cells to blue light can cause significant sustained decreases in RNA levels from many genes. However, the sustained decreases in RNA levels contrast with the transient increases seen in the expression of genes predicted to contain heat shock and σE-dependent promoters (42). Thus, illumination of low-oxygen cells with blue light stimulates a short-lived response that differs from the sustained increase we find in the presence of 1O2.

Because anaerobic phototrophs like R. sphaeroides do not produce O2 as a byproduct of photochemical activity and use carotenoids to quench 1O2 (2, 4), it may seem unnecessary for them to mount a transcriptional response to 1O2. However, R. sphaeroides is often found in low O2 environments (44), conditions where significant 1O2 could be generated by photochemical activity. Depending on light availability, dissolved O2 tension, and carotenoid content, the transcriptional response we discovered could play an important role in mitigating damage from 1O2 in nature (14, 45, 46). The finding that σE is essential when cells contain low levels of carotenoids predicts that one or more of its target genes is necessary for viability.

From this work and previous studies (17, 42), it appears that members of the σE regulon function to protect against and repair 1O2 damage in the cell (6, 8-11, 47-49). Rsp0296, cytochrome c2, is an essential part of the R. sphaeroides PS electron transport chain (17, 50). The P3 promoter for the cytochrome c2 gene (cycA) was previously shown to be σE-dependent (17). During photosynthesis, a fraction of the cytochrome c2 is likely to be in the immediate vicinity of 1O2, because this protein reduces the reaction center complexes that are oxidized after energy transfer from triplet-state chlorophyll molecules (17, 50). 1O2 inactivates the mitochondrial homolog of cytochrome c2 (51), so increased synthesis of cytochrome c2 may help maintain function of the PS apparatus when 1O2 is generated.

From our studies, four additional operons have been identified as members of the σE regulon. The predicted Rsp1087-1091 operon contains a σE-dependent promoter and is located directly upstream of the rpoEchrR operon (Rsp1092-1093) in R. sphaeroides and other bacteria that contain homologs of σE. Although Rsp1087-1091 have no known functions, Rsp1091 shows homology to the flavin-containing amine oxidoreductase family, and Rsp1087 is predicted to be a member of the short chain dehydrogenase/reductase family. Hence, it is possible that a product of the Rsp1087-1091 operon helps cells generate energy when 1O2 is produced. Rsp1409, another member of the σE regulon, shows 54% identity to the tspO-like regulator from Sinorhizobium meliloti (52). In S. meliloti, this tspO-like protein regulates the ndi (nutrient deprivation-induced) locus that is activated in an unknown manner by O2, N2, or C deprivation; by osmotic stress; or by entry into stationary phase (52). Therefore, Rsp1409 could aid in the response to damage generated by the formation of a ROS-like 1O2. Another σE-dependent operon identified in this study, Rsp2143-2146, encodes a DNA photolyase (Rsp2143-PhrB) that repairs pyrimidine dimers (53), and a cyclopropane-fatty-acyl-phospholipid synthetase (Rsp2144-CfaS) that uses S-adenosylmethionine to generate a methylene bridge across the double bonds in unsaturated fatty acids (54). 1O2 is known to modify unsaturated fatty acids, causing a loss of bilayer integrity and an increase in membrane permeability (37, 54). Thus, some combination of Rsp2143 and Rsp2144 could protect membranes and other cellular components from damage by 1O2 (53, 54). We also found that the Rsp0601 gene (rpoHII) contains a σE-dependent promoter. RpoHII is one of two R. sphaeroides heat-shock σ factors, so this response could help cells repair and replace components of the PS apparatus that were damaged by 1O2. Activation of RpoHII probably explains why many transcripts present at increased levels in ΔChrR cells do not appear to contain EσE-dependent promoters in vitro. It is possible that there are still unidentified members of the σE regulon, especially if these genes contain additional σE-independent promoters, like cycA, that could mask increases seen from σE-dependent promoters.

Among the operons tested that did not contain a detectable σE-dependent promoter were several that encode enzymes for carotenoid biosynthesis (Table 6). Thus, R. sphaeroides σE does not appear to directly control the synthesis of carotenoids that can quench 1O2. This is unlike M. xanthus, which uses an ECF σ factor and an anti-σ factor that lacks significant amino acid sequence similarity to ChrR to increase carotenoid synthesis under conditions that are proposed to generate 1O2 (24).

Conclusion

Our data indicate that 1O2, a ROS that can be generated within the PS apparatus, increases the activity of R. sphaeroides σE. σE is a member of the ECF family of alternative σ factors, which control gene expression in response to stress or signals generated beyond the cytoplasm (55, 56). Given the ability of all phototrophs to generate 1O2, it is not surprising to find homologs of R. sphaeroides σE and its anti-σ factor, ChrR, in the genomes of many PS bacteria (18). It appears likely that non-PS bacteria also mount a transcriptional response to 1O2, because σE and ChrR homologs are predicted to exist in proteobacteria that interact with humans, animals, or plants (Vibrio, Pseudomonas, and Salmonella) (18). Animal and plant cells contain peroxidases and other enzymes that are proposed to produce 1O2 to ward off microbial pathogens (57). Thus, further analysis of this transcriptional response to 1O2 is likely to provide insight into a signal transduction pathway found in bacteria with important agricultural, medical, and environmental activities.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Tables

Acknowledgments

We recognize Dr. Jack Newman for making the observation that mutations blocking carotenoid biosynthesis increased σE activity (39). We also thank Drs. Elizabeth Craig and Larry Anthony for their comments on the manuscript. This research was supported by National Institute of General Medical Sciences Grant GM37509 (to T.J.D.). J.R.A. is currently supported by the Louis and Elsa Thomsen Distinguished Graduate Fellowship for the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences and the University of Wisconsin Foundation.

Author contributions: J.R.A., K.L.W., and T.J.D. designed research; J.R.A. and K.L.W. performed research; J.R.A. and K.L.W. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; J.R.A., K.L.W., and T.J.D. analyzed data; and J.R.A. and T.J.D. wrote the paper.

Abbreviations: 1O2, singlet oxygen; ROS, reactive oxygen species; PS, photosynthetic; ECF, extracytoplasmic function family.

Data deposition: The microarray data reported in this paper have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus database (accession no. GSE2219).

References

  • 1.Briviba, K., Klotz, L. O. & Sies, H. (1997) Biol. Chem. 378, 1259-1265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cogdell, R. J., Howard, T. D., Bittl, R., Schlodder, E., Geisenheimer, I. & Lubitz, W. (2000) Philos. Trans. R Soc. London 355, 1345-1349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Frank, H. A. & Brudvig, G. W. (2004) Biochemistry 43, 8607-8615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Frank, H. A. & Cogdell, R. J. (1996) Photochem. Photobiol. 63, 257-264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Krieger-Liszkay, A. (2004) J. Exp. Bot. 56, 337-346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Davies, M. (2004) Photochem. Photobiol. 3, 17-25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lupinkova, L. & Komenda, J. (2004) Photochem. Photobiol. 79, 152-162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nishiyama, Y., Allakhverdiev, S. I., Yamamoto, H., Hayashi, H. & Murata, N. (2004) Biochemistry 43, 11321-11330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Piette, J. (1991) J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 11, 241-260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rinalducci, S., Pedersen, J. Z. & Zolla, L. (2004) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1608, 63-73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sies, H. & Menck, C. F. M. (1993) Mutat. Res. 275, 367-375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Griffiths, M., Sistrom, W. R., Cohenbazire, G., Stanier, R. Y. & Calvin, M. (1955) Nature 176, 1211-1215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lang, H. P., Cogdell, R. J., Gardiner, A. T. & Hunter, C. N. (1994) J. Bacteriol. 176, 3859-3869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lang, H. P., Cogdell, R. J., Takaichi, S. & Hunter, C. N. (1995) J. Bacteriol. 177, 2064-2073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Apel, K. & Hirt, H. (2004) Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 55, 373-399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rosner, J. L. & Storz, G. (1997) Curr. Top. Cell Regul. 35, 163-177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Newman, J. D., Falkowski, M. J., Schilke, B. A., Anthony, L. C. & Donohue, T. J. (1999) J. Mol. Biol. 294, 307-320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Newman, J. D., Anthony, J. R. & Donohue, T. J. (2001) J. Mol. Biol. 313, 485-499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Anthony, J. R., Newman, J. D. & Donohue, T. J. (2004) J. Mol. Biol. 341, 345-360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Op den Camp, R. G., Przybyla, D., Ochsenbein, C., Laloi, C., Kim, C., Danon, A., Wagner, D., Hideg, E., Gobel, C., Feussner, I., et al. (2003) Plant Cell 15, 2320-2332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wagner, D., Przybyla, D., Op den Camp, R., Kim, C., Landgraf, F., Lee, K. P., Wursch, M., Laloi, C., Nater, M., Hideg, E., et al. (2004) Science 306, 1183-1185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Leisinger, U., Rufenacht, K., Fischer, B., Pesaro, M., Spengler, A., Zehnder, A. J. & Eggen, R. I. (2001) Plant Mol. Biol. 46, 395-408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Agnez-Lima, L. F., Di Mascio, P., Demple, B. & Menck, C. F. (2001) Biol. Chem. 382, 1071-1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hodgson, D. A. & Berry, A. E. (1998) Light Regulation of Carotenoid Synthesis in Myxococcus xanthus (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.).
  • 25.Sistrom, W. R. (1960) J. Gen. Microbiol. 22, 778-785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schilke, B. A. & Donohue, T. J. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 226, 101-115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Li, K., Pasternak, C. & Klug, G. (2003) Arch. Microbiol. 180, 484-489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cohen-Bazire, G., Sistrom, W. R. & Stanier, R. Y. (1957) J. Cell Physiol. 49, 25-68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Karls, R. K., Wolf, J. R. & Donohue, T. J. (1999) Mol. Microbiol. 34, 822-835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Roh, J. H., Smith, W. E. & Kaplan, S. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 9146-9155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pappas, C. T., Sram, J., Moskvin, O. V., Ivanov, P. S., Mackenzie, R. C., Choudhary, M., Land, M. L., Larimer, F. W., Kaplan, S. & Gomelsky, M. (2004) J. Bacteriol. 186, 4748-4758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Anthony, J. R., Green, H. A. & Donohue, T. J. (2003) Methods Enzymol. 370, 54-65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Shepherd, W. D., Kaplan, S. & Park, J. T. (1981) J. Bacteriol. 147, 354-361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chory, J., Donohue, T. J., Varga, A. R., Staehelin, L. A. & Kaplan, S. (1984) J. Bacteriol. 159, 540-554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kiley, P. J., Varga, A. & Kaplan, S. (1988) J. Bacteriol. 170, 1103-1115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zeilstra-Ryalls, J. H. & Kaplan, S. (2004) Cell Mol. Life Sci. 61, 417-436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kochevar, I. E. (2004) Sci. STKE 2004, pe7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nyman, E. S. & Hynninen, P. H. (2004) J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 73, 1-28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Newman, J. D. (2001) Ph.D. thesis (Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison).
  • 40.MacGregor, B. J., Karls, R. K. & Donohue, T. J. (1998) J. Bacteriol. 180, 1-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Brandner, J. P., McEwan, A. G., Kaplan, S. & Donohue, T. J. (1989) J. Bacteriol. 171, 360-368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Braatsch, S., Moskvin, O. V., Klug, G. & Gomelsky, M. (2004) J. Bacteriol. 186, 7726-7735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Usuda, J., Azizuddin, K., Chiu, S.-m. & Oleinick, N. L. (2003) Photochem. Photobiol. 78, 1-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Blankenship, R. E., Madigan, M. T. & Bauer, C. E. (1995) Anoxygenic Photosynthetic Bacteria (Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands).
  • 45.Krinsky, N. I. (1978) Philos. Trans. R Soc. London B 284, 581-590. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cogdell, R. J. & Frank, H. A. (1987) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 895, 63-79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hideg, E. & Vass, I. (1995) Photochem. Photobiol. 62, 949-952. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Tatsuzawa, H., Maruyama, T., Misawa, N., Fujimori, K., Hori, K., Sano, Y., Kambayashi, Y. & Nakano, M. (1998) FEBS Lett. 439, 329-333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wagner, J. R., Motchnik, P. A., Stocker, R., Sies, H. & Ames, B. N. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 18502-18506. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Donohue, T. J., McEwan, A. G., Van Doren, S., Crofts, A. R. & Kaplan, S. (1988) Biochemistry 27, 1918-1925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Estevam, M. L., Nascimento, O. R., Baptista, M. S., Di Mascio, P., Prado, F. M., Faljoni-Alario, A., Zucchi, M. d. R. & Nantes, I. L. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 39214-39222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Davey, M. E. & de Bruijn, F. J. (2000) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 5353-5359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sancar, A. (2003) Chem. Rev. 103, 2203-2237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Cronan, J. E., Jr. (2002) Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 5, 202-205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Paget, M. & Helmann, J. (2003) Genome Biol. 4, 203.1-203.6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Gruber, T. M. & Gross, C. A. (2003) Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 57, 441-466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kanofsky, J. R. (1989) Chem. Biol. Interact. 70, 1-28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Miller, J. H. (1972) Experiments in Molecular Genetics (Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press, Plainview, NY).

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Tables
pnas_102_18_6502__1.html (22.7KB, html)
pnas_102_18_6502__2.html (12.2KB, html)

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES