Skip to main content
Health Science Reports logoLink to Health Science Reports
. 2024 Feb 23;7(2):e1914. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1914

Vaccination and its impact on healthcare utilization in two groups of vaccinated and unvaccinated patients with COVID‐19: A cross‐sectional study in Iran between 2021 and 2022

Erfan Kharazmi 1, Mohsen Bayati 1, Ali Majidpour Azad Shirazi 1,
PMCID: PMC10885182  PMID: 38405172

Abstract

Background and Aims

One of the main responsibilities of health systems impacted by the global Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic, where the first case was discovered in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, is the provision of medical services. The current study looked into the impact of vaccination on the utilization of services provided to COVID‐19 patients.

Methods

This study was conducted in Iran between 2021 and 2022, utilizing a cross‐sectional research design. The research team collected data on the utilization of provided services and the number of COVID‐19 vaccines administered to 1000 patients in Iran through a random sampling approach. The data were analyzed with statistical methods, including the mean difference test, and multiple linear regression.

Results

Regression estimates show that after controlling for confounding variables like age, type of admission, and comorbidities, vaccination reduces the utilization of healthcare services in the general majority of services. The study's results reveal a fall in COVID‐19 patients' utilization of services, specifically in patients administered two or three doses of the vaccine. However, the reduction is not statistically significant. Regression models are in contrast to univariate analysis findings that vaccination increases the mean utilization of healthcare services for COVID‐19 patients in general. Comorbidities are a crucial factor in determining the utilization of diagnostic and treatment services for COVID‐19 patients.

Conclusion

Full COVID‐19 vaccination and other implementations, including investing in public health, cooperating globally, and vaccinating high‐risk groups for future pandemics, are essential as a critical response to this pandemic as they reduce healthcare service utilization to alleviate the burden on healthcare systems and allocate resources more efficiently.

Keywords: COVID‐19, Coronavirus, Utilization of Health Services, Vaccination

1. INTRODUCTION

On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the new Coronavirus outbreak a global public health emergency. The disease was later named Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). On March 11, 2020, it was classified as an epidemic. According to WHO reports, as of August 16, 2023, there would have been 769,806,130 confirmed cases of COVID‐19 worldwide, resulting in 6,955,497 fatalities. 1

The COVID‐19 outbreak in Iran is a global crisis caused by the Coronavirus and its acute respiratory syndrome. Iran recorded its first case of COVID‐19 on February 19, 2020. Since then, there have been eight waves of epidemics, and as of August 16, 2023, there have been 7,613,468 cases of the disease with 146,321 fatalities, according to WHO. 2

Since the first case in January 2020, the acute respiratory syndrome virus has been constantly evolving, resulting in various variants with mutations that alter receptor binding. 3 , 4 The Alpha variant of SARS‐CoV‐2, or B.1.1.7, was first identified in the United Kindom in September 2020 and rapidly spread. 5 The Alpha variant, in 2021, was the most common strain of COVID‐19 in Denmark, Switzerland, and the United States. It is 56% more infectious than earlier strains. 6 , 7 , 8 The Delta variant, B.1.617.2, was found in India in December 2020. It is 40%–60% more contagious than The Alpha variant. 9 Notably, COVID‐19's impact on hospitalized patients has changed with new strains, treatments, and vaccines. But age and underlying health conditions remain risk factors for mortality across all strains. 10

Vaccines are seen as a solution to the pandemic. COVID‐19 vaccines have efficacy rates from 65% to 95% against symptomatic cases. 4 The evidence shows that injecting the vaccination before contracting COVID‐19 by creating immunity reduces the prevalence of symptomatic disease in patients. 11 Full vaccination might be one of the finest COVID‐19 control measures, potentially preventing millions of deaths. 12 The inactivated BBIBP‐CorV vaccine (Sinopharm), made in China, has a 79.34% effectiveness rate. 13 New strains of SARS‐CoV‐2 may affect the effectiveness of COVID‐19 vaccines. 14 Vaccines may be less effective against Delta variant. Pfizer's efficacy rate is 79% and AstraZeneca‐Oxford's is 60%. 14 , 15 Pfizer and AstraZeneca‐Oxford vaccines are less effective against the Delta variant with a single dose. 16

The WHO reported that 13,499,865,692 vaccine doses had been administered globally until August 19, 2023. 1 Boosters reduce severe illness and death for COVID patients without prior infection, but the effectiveness of vaccines may vary based on prior infections. 17 , 18 Another study found there is no correlation between previous SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and adverse events or hospitalization. However, those previously infected were less likely to visit the accident and emergency department after CoronaVac or Comirnaty vaccination. 19 In a study using a model design, Reddy et al. asserted that prioritizing high‐risk groups and vaccinating at least 40% of the population in South Africa, saved more than nine million lives in prevalence and prevented more than 73,000 fatalities. 20 Watson et al. found that if low‐income countries vaccinated 20% of their general population against COVID‐19, up to 45% of COVID‐19‐related deaths may be prevented. If this objective was adjusted to 40%, up to 111% of deaths may be prevented (based on the WHO target). 21 Magazzino et al.'s machine learning analysis demonstrated a decrease in COVID‐19 fatalities as a result of successful vaccination campaigns and high public participation. 22

The key to optimal COVID‐19 vaccination rates is through mathematical models, optimization algorithms, and prioritizing the vaccination of a larger number of older individuals first. 23 This approach also involves vaccinating a portion of the younger population to reduce the risk of transmission between age groups. 24 With regard to the optimal level of vaccination, this rate for COVID‐19 is around 80 doses per 100 people, but an intensive campaign can reduce this to 47 doses initially and increase it to around 90 doses as the pandemic wave intensifies. 25

Global vaccine distribution is restricted by vaccine hesitancy, which stems from various factors including government, healthcare, population, lower education, unemployment, lack of vaccine information, concerns about side effects, and misinformation spread through social media. 26 , 27 Although some people may feel hesitant about getting the COVID‐19 vaccine because they are concerned about side effects such as fever, arm, and muscle pain, these reactions are often mild and do not last long. 28 Reports of neurological side effects, including cerebrovascular and demyelinating disorders, are rare and temporary. 29 Wealthy and developed nations tend to have higher vaccine hesitancy rates, which can reach up to 70%. Countries with stable governments and political systems tend to have higher vaccination rates. Monetary incentives may encourage hesitant individuals to get vaccinated. 30 Also, Urban areas have higher rates of immunization due to disparities in vaccine distribution. This gap is worsened by factors such as maternal healthcare access, household wealth, number of children, and sources of information. 31

We conducted this study to ascertain how the administration of the COVID‐19 vaccine affected the utilization of screening and treatment services that are given by health systems in light of Iran's higher ranking in the death rate and new COVID‐19 reported incidents (according to WHO reports on August 10, 2021, Iran had the highest daily incidence of new cases among other countries 32 ) from the start of April 2021 (the start of the fifth wave of the epidemic) to the end of October 2021 (the end of the sixth wave of the epidemic) and the escalation of massive public vaccination in Iran from July 2021 with the administering of the first dose of the vaccine according to the WHO reports. 2

2. METHODS

2.1. Sample and data

Between 2021 and 2022, we conducted a cross‐sectional study in Shiraz, Iran. Our sample consisted of 1000 participants who had previously tested positive for COVID‐19 via polymerase chain reaction (PCR), out of a pool of 3724 individuals. Of these participants, 349 were admitted to the hospital while 651 received outpatient services. We categorized the participants into two groups based on their vaccination status.

We acquired data from the Hospital Information System on patients' utilization of clinical and therapeutic services. The number of vaccine doses given and the date of injection for each participant were recorded in a form made by the researchers using the Integrated Health System. The information was obtained without exposing the patients' identities in the following ethical norms. Informed consent was not needed as all patients were anonymized and only aggregate data were used.

2.2. Measures of variables

There are three main categories of variables involved in this study. The number of vaccine doses given to the patient and whether or not the vaccine is injected are intervention factors. Dependent variables include the utilization of services in terms of visits and clinical consults, laboratory tests, medication, consumables, radiology, computerized tomography (CT) scans, surgeries, ultrasound, rehabilitation services, intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization, non‐ICU hospitalization, dialysis, nutritional counseling, and blood gas test. Contextual variables include age, gender, type of insurance, residence, type of admission, and comorbidities including autoimmune disorders, cancers, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and respiratory diseases.

2.3. Models and data analysis procedure

After acquiring the data, we used Stata 17 to perform statistical analysis using various methods, including mean difference test and multiple linear regression. Performing mean difference tests, we assessed whether vaccination and the number of doses administered to patients are associated with a difference in the utilization of diagnostic and treatment services.

We conducted two multiple linear regression models: the first model examined the impact of vaccination on diagnostic and therapeutic service utilization while controlling for contextual variables, while the second model examined the impact of the number of doses given on diagnostic and treatment service utilization while controlling for contextual variables. We assessed regression coefficients at significant levels of 0.01, 0.05, and 0.10. Notably, the current study hypothesizes that COVID‐19 vaccination and booster doses reduce the utilization of diagnostic and treatment services for patients.

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences under code IR.SUMS.NUMIMG.REC.1401.037.

3. RESULTS

According to the survey results, the average age of the participants was 51.48 ± 17.97. Out of the total 1000 participants, 1.6% suffered from autoimmune disorders, 0.9% suffered from cancer, 10% suffered from diabetes, 15.9% suffered from cardiac diseases, and 6.9% had respiratory disorders.

From 2021 to 2022, we gathered a sample of 1000 participants. Among them, 181 patients were not vaccinated before being referred to the hospital and receiving treatment and were therefore included in the group of unvaccinated patients. The remaining COVID‐19 patients were vaccinated at least a week before being referred to the hospital for treatment and were grouped as vaccinated patients. The vaccinated group was divided into two subgroups, where 274 received just one dose and 545 received two or three doses. Table 1 provides a comprehensive overview of the vaccination and demographic details of the 1000 participants.

Table 1.

Participants' demographic and vaccination information in Iran between 2021 and 2022 (n = 1000).

Variable Category Number Percentage
Gender Female 519 51.90
Male 481 48.10
Age <20 17 1.7
20–30 137 13.7
31–40 124 12.4
41–50 211 21.1
51–60 203 20.3
61–70 158 15.8
>70 150 15
Type of Insurance Social Security 491 49.10
Health Service 361 36.10
Armed Forces 60 6
Other 34 3.40
Non‐insured 54 5.40
Discharge Recovery 861 86.10
Death 64 6.40
Transfer 5 0.50
Voluntary Clearance 70 7
Location Non‐province Center 30 3
Province Center 970 97
Patients Inpatient 349 34.90
Outpatient 651 65.10
Vaccination Non‐Vaccinated 819 81.90
Vaccinated 181 18.10
Injected doses Non‐Vaccinated 181 18.10
1 Dose Administered 274 27.40
2 or 3 Doses Administered 545 54.50

Using mean difference tests, vaccination in patients infected with COVID‐19 increases the overall mean utilization of diagnostic and treatment services. The utilization of visits, laboratory tests, consumables, medicines, ultrasounds, dialysis, radiology, blood gas test, echo, and nutritional counseling grow significantly following vaccination (Supporting Information S1: Table S1 in the appendices presents the results of mean difference test based on vaccination, and the normality distribution of each variable).

As follows, mean difference tests show that patients infected with COVID‐19 who received the second or third dose of vaccination tend to have higher utilization of diagnostic and therapeutic services compared to those who received only the first dose (Supporting Information S1: Table S2 in the appendices presents the results of mean difference test based on the number of vaccine doses administered.).

The first regression model explores the impact of vaccination on patient utilization of diagnostic and therapeutic services while accounting for contextual factors. The results are presented in Table 2. In this model, vaccination significantly reduces the use of CT scans, medication, rehabilitation services, hospitalization in the ICU, and hospitalization outside the ICU. Men undergo dialysis more frequently than women, and the use of medication and radiology increases with age.

Table 2.

Variables affecting the utilization of services based on vaccination in Iran between 2021 and 2022.

Length of non‐ICU stay Length of ICU stay Visits and Medical Counseling Laboratory Medicine Ultrasound Rehabilitation Dialysis Radiology CT scan Arterial Blood Gas test Echo Nutrition Advice Surgery Medical Supplies
Vaccination −0.206 −0.160 0.007 −0.061 −0.337 0.001 −0.018 0.015 0.001 −0.025 0.001 0.012 0.004 0.006 0.261
Age 0.007 −0.002 0.001 0.005 0.026* 0.002 0.000 −0.000 0.001* 0.000 −0.000 0.000* 0.000 0.000 0.048
Gender (Male) 0.010 0.0712 0.029 0.346 0.349 0.013 −0.001 0.019* 0.029 −0.004 −0.011 0.019 0.000 −0.014 0.419
Admission (Inpatient) 5.395*** 1.184*** 3.445*** 27.575*** 13.489*** 0.319 0.047** 0.003 0.234*** 0.629*** 1.052*** 1.069 0.996*** 0.068*** 22.485***
Location (Nonprovince Center) 1.092 −0.1031 0.169 0.924 1.864 0.178 0.022 0.063 0.048 −0.039 0.032 0.041 0.003 0.004 2.728
Insurance (Insuree) −0.405 0.153 0.083 0.294 0.256 −0.008 0.004 0.010 −0.020 0.010 0.007 0.018 −0.000 0.005 0.240
Autoimmune Diseases 1.543 0.507 0.719* 4.017*** 4.407* 0.417 0.109* 0.047 0.044 0.210 −0.008 0.224*** 0.006 0.017 4.694*
Cancers 1.117 −1.220 0.763* −0.796 1.119 0.297 −0.072 −0.047 0.241* 0.919*** 0.048 −0.085 0.003 0.271*** 6.125*
Diabetes 0.244 −0.813* 0.294* −1.150* −0.704 0.055 −0.026 0.068** 0.017 −0.011 −0.020 0.015 −0.006 −0.023 −0.381
Cardiovascular Diseases 1.107* 1.045** 0.290* 1.804*** 4.963*** 0.247 0.038* 0.053** 0.094* 0.185* 0.036* 0.200*** 0.000 −0.000 5.290***
Respiratory Diseases −1.167* 1.588*** 0.149 1.414* 6.138*** −0.057 0.052* 0.104*** 0.120** 0.259 0.024 0.116** −0.012* −0.069** 5.798***
_cons 0.166 0.087 0.845*** −0.681 1.579 −0.113 −0.014 −0.018 −0.053 −0.012 0.008 −0.083* −0.007 −0.008 1.861

F = 50.66

R 2 = 0.360

F = 10.67

R 2 = 0.106

F = 216.95

R 2 = 0.707

F =1044.64

R 2 = 0.920

F = 118.56

R 2 = 0.569

F = 24.32

R 2 = 0.213

F = 5.88

R 2 = 0.061

F = 8.93

R 2 = 0.090

F = 23.92

R 2 = 0.210

F = 36.31

R 2 = 0.287

F = 918.74

R 2 = 0.910

F = 516.84

R 2 = 0.851

F = 10,238.17

R 2 = 0.991

F = 4.82

R 2 = 0.050

F = 150.19

R 2 = 0.625

*

p Value is significant at the 0.10 level, p < 0.1

**

p Value is significant at the 0.05 level, p < 0.05

***

p Value is significant at the 0.01 level, p < 0.01.

Compared to COVID‐19 outpatients, hospitalized patients use more diagnostic and therapeutic services, including consumables, surgery, nutrition counseling, blood gas tests, CT scans, radiology, rehabilitation services, medicine, laboratory services, visits, length of ICU hospitalization, and non‐ICU hospitalization.

Moreover, we evaluate how comorbidities affect COVID‐19 patients' use of diagnostic and treatment services concerning five other illnesses. COVID‐19 patients with autoimmune disorders utilize more diagnostic and treatment services, including consumables, echo, rehabilitation, medicines, laboratory tests, and visits. The use of diagnostic and treatment services for COVID‐19 patients with cancer increases, along with a significant rise in the use of consumables, surgeries, CT scans, radiology, and visits.

The utilization of diagnostic and treatment services significantly changes for COVID‐19 patients with diabetes. In this regard, visits and dialysis increase, while ICU hospitalization and laboratory services decrease.

There is a notable rise in the utilization of diagnostic and therapeutic measures for COVID‐19 patients who have underlying cardiovascular conditions. This encompasses a range of services, such as consumables, echo, blood gas tests, CT scans, radiology, dialysis, rehabilitation services, medications, laboratory services, visits, and hospital stays, both in intensive care and nonintensive care settings.

The overall utilization of diagnostic and therapeutic services for COVID‐19 patients with respiratory disorders significantly increases. This rise includes the use of consumables, echo, radiology, dialysis, rehabilitation services, medicines, laboratory services, and length of ICU hospitalization.

The second regression model analyzes how the number of doses affects the usage of medical services for COVID‐19 patients. The impact of contextual variables is also considered, and the results are presented in Table 3. In this model, administering two or three vaccination doses rather than one and withholding the vaccine reduces the duration of hospitalization in the ICU, non‐ICU stay, consumption of resources, CT scans, rehabilitation services, ultrasounds, medication, laboratory services, and visits.

Table 3.

Variables affecting utilization of services based on the number of vaccine doses administered in Iran between 2021 and 2022.

Visits and Medical Counseling Laboratory Medicine Ultrasound Rehabilitation Dialysis Radiology CT scan Arterial Blood Gas test Echo Nutrition Advice Surgery Medical Supplies Length of non‐ICU stay Length of ICU stay
1 Dose Administered (non‐vaccinated) 0.036 −0.056 0.237 0.021 −0.012 0.010 0.001 −0.014 0.011 0.001 0.005 0.025 1.230 0.106 −0.089
2 or 3 Doses Administered (non‐vaccinated) −0.016 −0.065 −0.806 −0.015 −0.023 0.019 0.001 −0.035 −0.006 0.021 0.003 −0.008 −0.527 −0.461 −0.218
Age 0.001 0.005 0.036 0.002 0.000 −0.000 0.001 0.000 −0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.064** 0.012 −0.001
Gender (Male) 0.030 0.346 0.357 0.013 −0.001 0.019* 0.029 −0.004 −0.011 0.019 0.000 −0.014 0.432 0.014 0.072
Patients (Inpatient) 3.445*** 27.575*** 13.501*** 0.319*** 0.047** 0.003 0.234*** 0.629*** 1.052*** 1.068*** 0.996*** 0.069*** 22.505*** 5.401*** 1.185***
Location (Non‐province Center) 0.163 0.923 1.743 0.174* 0.020 0.064* 0.048 −0.041 0.030 0.043 0.002 0.000 2.524 1.026 −0.118
Insurance (Insuree) 0.088 0.295 0.343 −0.005 0.005 0.010 −0.020 0.012 0.009 0.016 −0.000 0.008 0.386 −0.357 0.164
Autoimmune Diseases 0.723* 4.018*** 4.483* 0.420** 0.110* 0.046 0.044 0.212 −0.006 0.223*** 0.006 0.019 4.822* 1.585 0.516
Cancers 0.767* −0.795 1.180 0.299* −0.071 −0.047 0.241* 0.921*** 0.049 −0.086 0.003 0.273*** 6.227* 1.150 −1.213
Diabetes 0.299* −1.149* −0.613 0.058 −0.025 0.067** 0.017 −0.009 −0.019 0.013 −0.006 −0.020 −0.227 0.293 −0.802*
Cardiovascular Diseases 0.290* 1.804*** 4.961*** 0.247*** 0.038* 0.053** 0.094 0.185* 0.036 0.200*** 0.000 −0.000 5.286*** 1.106* 1.045**
Respiratory Diseases 0.150 1.414* 6.160*** −0.056 0.052* 0.104*** 0.120** 0.259** 0.025 0.116** −0.012* −0.068** 5.836*** −1.154* 1.591***
_cons 0.819*** −0.0685 1.067 −0.131 −0.019 −0.013 −0.053 −0.023 −0.000 −0.073 −0.008 −0.025 0.999 −0.112 0.023

F = 198.75

R2 = 0.707

F = 956.62

R2 = 0.920

F = 109.12

R2 = 0.570

F = 22.35

R2 = 0.213

F = 5.43

R2 = 0.061

F = 8.22

R2 = 0.090

F = 21.90

R2 = 0.210

F = 33.27

R2 = 0.288

F = 843.04

R2 = 0.911

F = 473.86

R2 = 0.852

F = 9377.23

R2 = 0.991

F = 4.86

R2 = 0.055

F = 138.51

R2 = 0.627

F = 46.82

R2 = 0.362

F = 9.80

R2 = 0.106

*

P‐value is significant at the 0.10 level, p‐value < 0.1

**

P‐value is significant at the 0.05 level, p‐value < 0.05

***

P‐value is significant at the 0.01 level, p‐value < 0.01

In this model, men have a higher dialysis usage rate than women. Additionally, the consumption of diagnostic and treatment services increases with age. In comparison to outpatients with COVID‐19, hospitalized patients tend to require more frequent use of diagnostic and therapeutic services. This includes an elevated demand for consumables, surgery, nutrition counseling, echo, blood gas tests, CT scans, radiology, rehabilitation services, ultrasounds, medicines, laboratory services, visits, and a longer hospitalization period in both the ICU and non‐ICU setting.

Furthermore, we assess the impact of comorbidities on the utilization of diagnostic and treatment services for COVID‐19 patients, compared to five other illnesses. The overall use of diagnostic and treatment services for COVID‐19 patients with autoimmune disorders increases, with a significant rise in consumables, echoes, rehabilitation services, ultrasounds, medicines, laboratory services, and visits.

COVID‐19 patients with cancer experience prolonged hospital stays, increased demand for nutritional counseling and blood gas tests, heightened medication usage, and a significant surge in the utilization of consumables, surgery, CT scans, radiology, ultrasounds, and doctor visits.

The use of diagnostic and therapeutic services increases for COVID‐19 patients with diabetes, including ultrasounds, radiology, echocardiography, and non‐ICU hospitalization length. Additionally, there is a significant increase in visits and dialysis services.

The use of diagnostic and therapeutic services for COVID‐19 patients with cardiac disorders leads to a significant increase in hospitalization, consumables, and medical services. Also, COVID‐19 patients with respiratory disorders require increased use of diagnostic and therapeutic services, including ICU hospitalization, consumables, echo, CT scans, radiology, dialysis, rehabilitation services, medicines, and laboratory tests.

Overall, regression estimates show that vaccination decreases medical utilization in COVID‐19 patients by controlling for confounding factors, such as age and comorbidities.

4. DISCUSSION

The study aimed to investigate how vaccination and the number of doses injected before COVID‐19 infection impacted healthcare utilization in confirmed cases. Regression estimates revealed that vaccination reduced healthcare service utilization for COVID‐19 patients, after controlling for confounding variables. However, univariate analysis tests showed that vaccination increased mean healthcare service utilization for COVID‐19 patients in general. According to the study, vaccines and booster doses play a crucial role in reducing medicine, medical supplies, and the length of hospitalization in both ICU and non‐ICU departments.

Vilches et al. found that patients who received the Pfizer‐BioNTech and Moderna vaccines experienced a significant decrease of 27.3% and 27.0%, respectively, in hospitalization rates in Ontario, Canada. 33 López et al. conducted a study indicating that the vaccination of Catalonia could potentially result in an 18% reduction in ICU hospitalizations, a 16% reduction in hospital admissions, a 5% decrease in PCR testing utilization, and a 1% decrease in RAT testing utilization. 34 Also, Hall et al. state that vaccination not only lessens the occurrence of COVID‐19 symptoms but also diminishes the spread of infection, In England. 35 Moghadas et al. found that giving priority to adults aged 65 and above during vaccination could lower the overall attack rate from 9% to 4.6%. It could also decrease the death rate to 69.3%, the non‐ICU hospitalization rate to 63.5%, and the ICU hospitalization rate to 65.6%. 36

Regarding the use of COVID‐19 health services, factors including type of vaccine as well as variants of the virus play a significant role that will be regarded in the following. According to Munir et al.'s research, individuals who received the messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine (Moderna) reported significantly higher postvaccination side effects (85%) compared to those who received the inactivated virus vaccine (Sinovac) (21%). 37 McLean et al. found that current vaccines are effective against the Alpha variant but not as effective against the Beta and Delta variants for causing symptoms. Boosters help restore protection but may decrease over time. 38

Patients with comorbidity diseases show increased utilization of diagnostic and therapeutic services when infected with COVID‐19. The utilization of services also varies significantly depending on the type of comorbidity, with autoimmune, cardiac, and respiratory disorders showing increased utilization in several areas. In terms of medicines, visits, consumables, laboratory tests, radiology, and length of ICU hospitalization, the utilization of diagnostic and therapeutic services in COVID‐19 patients with autoimmune, cardiac, and respiratory disorders increases significantly. In COVID‐19 patients with diabetes, the length of stay in the ICU and the use of laboratory services both significantly decrease while visits and dialysis both significantly increase in the same group. The utilization of consumables, surgery, CT scans, radiology, ultrasounds, and visits increases significantly for COVID‐19 patients with cancer.

A study in India found that 21.4% of those who died from COVID‐19 had underlying health conditions. After receiving both vaccine doses, the mortality rate for patients with comorbidities dropped to 0.6%. 39 Cancer patients with weakened immune systems may need shorter intervals between COVID‐19 vaccine doses. Vaccination programs should prioritize this population for booster doses. 40  The adjusted odds ratios of COVID‐19 patients with comorbidities such as cardiovascular disorders, immunosuppressive diseases, and diabetes, respectively, are 1.79, 1.65, and 1.41, according to research by De Rosa et al. in Italy. 41 People with weak immune systems may not get the same protection from COVID‐19 vaccination as healthy people, leading to a higher risk of severe side effects, intensive care requirement, and higher mortality rate. 42

The effectiveness of vaccination programs is hindered by various factors, in particular, in Iran, including the lack of timely reminder doses, international sanctions, cultural and social concerns have led to a lack of public acceptance of vaccination, delays in establishing infrastructure for widespread vaccine distribution, 43 global vaccine supply constraints, 44 prioritization of high‐risk groups for vaccination, 43 and varying efficacy of different types of vaccines against new variants like the Omicron. 45 The widespread use of inactivated virus vaccines like Sinopharm may not be as effective as viral vector or mRNA vaccines against new variants. 46 Furthermore, mobility restrictions implemented in response to COVID‐19 have led to a decline in medical service utilization, exacerbating health outcomes, particularly maternal and child mortality rates. 47 In this regard, overall healthcare utilization decreased by 37%, with significant declines in visits (42%), admissions (28%), diagnostics (31%), and treatments (30%), and reductions varied with illness severity, with milder cases showing more significant decreases. 48 In this regard, a study in Ethiopia found managing COVID‐19 patients was costly, especially for the elderly and those with comorbidities, which governments should prioritize vaccinating these high‐risk groups to reduce the financial burden on health facilities. 49 Also, considering how COVID‐19 spreads and related climate factors are vital for effective public health measures. Officials can use the virus's seasonal pattern and low humidity and high temperatures during summer months to reduce transmission rates. 50

COVID‐19 variants and economic challenges have made vaccination campaigns less effective and strained resources for patients. Addressing these challenges and navigating future health crises demand a multifaceted approach that encompasses vaccine delivery, supply chain optimization, vaccine development, tailored guidelines, behavioral modifications, strategic lockdowns, improving vaccination acceptance and targeted vaccination campaigns, all underpinned by strong governance, adequate public investments, and supportive sociocultural factors. 30 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 With regard to crisis management, adopting strategies and new technology that involve minimal strict containment restrictions are more efficient. 53 For instance, a Canadian study found that a remote care program known as COVIDEO, a program offered virtual consultations for COVID‐19 patients, reduced emergency department visits, hospitalizations, or deaths and facilitated direct‐to‐ward hospitalizations. 56

5. CONCLUSIONS

We searched and prepared the study without finding any other studies in Iran that were comparable. However, this study has some limitations that need to be addressed. These include registration errors, errors in the use of provided services and clinical information from the integrated health system, and the lack of available data on the vaccine type administered to patients as well as infecting variants of the virus for evaluating vaccine effectiveness. Therefore, further research is needed using advanced statistical methods to reach a definite conclusion due to ambiguous results, study limitations, and contextual factors not considered.

Full vaccination, along with contextual factors, plays a critical role in the healthcare service utilization of COVID‐19 patients. By expanding universal vaccination, decision‐makers can suppress rising utilization and expenditures of health services induced by COVID‐19. Future pandemics require a comprehensive approach and significant investments in public health infrastructure, global cooperation, and efficient vaccination plans for high‐risk groups.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Erfan Kharazmi: Supervision; validation. Mohsen Bayati: Data curation; formal analysis; methodology; software. Ali Majidpour Azad Shirazi: Conceptualization; data curation; investigation; project administration; resources; writing—original draft; writing—review and editing.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

ETHICS STATEMENT

The project was found to be by the ethical principles and the national norms and standards for conducting medical research. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences under code IR.SUMS.NUMIMG.REC.1401.037. We used aggregate utilization data so informed consent was not required. Approval Date: 2022‐05‐14; Approval ID: IR.SUMS.NUMIMG.REC.1401.037.

TRANSPARENCY STATEMENT

The lead author Ali Majidpour Azad Shirazi affirms that this manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned (and, if relevant, registered) have been explained.

Supporting information

Supporting information.

HSR2-7-e1914-s001.docx (72.8KB, docx)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would also like to express their sincere appreciation to the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences for their assistance in gathering data for the study. This paper is based on a research project approved at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (grant number 25731). The funder had no role in the study design, data collection, statistical analysis, interpretation of findings, and writing of the manuscript.

Kharazmi E, Bayati M, Majidpour Azad Shirazi A. Vaccination and its impact on healthcare utilization in two groups of vaccinated and unvaccinated patients with COVID‐19: a cross‐sectional study in Iran between 2021 and 2022. Health Sci Rep. 2024;7:e1914. 10.1002/hsr2.1914

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The datasets gathered and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The corresponding author has full access to all of the data in this study and takes complete responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Timeline: WHO's COVID‐19 response. World Health Organization. 2023. Accessed August 16, 2023. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/interactive-timeline#!
  • 2.Iran (Islamic Republic of). World Health Organization. 2023. Accessed August 16, 2023. https://covid19.who.int/region/emro/country/ir
  • 3.Weekly epidemiological update on COVID‐19. World Health Organization. 2022. Accessed October 5, 2022. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20221005_weekly_epi_update_112.pdf?sfvrsn=13238981_7&download=true
  • 4. Christie A, Mbaeyi SA, Walensky RP. CDC interim recommendations for fully vaccinated people: an important first step. JAMA. 2021;325(15):1501‐1502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Galloway SE, Paul P, MacCannell DR, et al. Emergence of SARS‐CoV‐2 b. 1.1. 7 lineage—United States, December 29, 2020–January 12, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(3):95‐99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Davies NG, Abbott S, Barnard RC, et al. Estimated transmissibility and impact of SARS‐CoV‐2 lineage B. 1.1. 7 in England. Science. 2021;372(6538):eabg3055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Challen R, Brooks‐Pollock E, Read JM, Dyson L, Tsaneva‐Atanasova K, Danon L. Risk of mortality in patients infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 variant of concern 202012/1: matched cohort study. BMJ. 2021;352:372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Gómez CE, Perdiguero B, Esteban M. Emerging SARS‐CoV‐2 variants and impact in global vaccination programs against SARS‐CoV‐2/COVID‐19. Vaccines. 2021;9(3):243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Ray SK, Mukherjee S. Divulging incipient SARS‐CoV‐2 delta (B.1.617.2) variant: possible interference with global scenario. Infect Disord Drug Targets. 2023;23(1):e060622205636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Stepanova M, Lam B, Younossi E, et al. The impact of variants and vaccination on the mortality and resource utilization of hospitalized patients with COVID‐19. BMC Infect Dis. 2022;22(1):702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Mittelman M, Magen O, Barda N, et al. Effectiveness of the BNT162b2mRNA COVID‐19 vaccine in patients with hematological neoplasms in a nationwide mass vaccination setting. Blood. 2022;139(10):1439‐1451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Mahase E. Covid‐19: Russian vaccine efficacy is 91.6%, show phase III trial results. BMJ. 2021;372:n309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Logunov DY, Dolzhikova IV, Shcheblyakov DV, et al. Safety and efficacy of an rAd26 and rAd5 vector‐based heterologous prime‐boost COVID‐19 vaccine: an interim analysis of a randomised controlled phase 3 trial in Russia. Lancet. 2021;397(10275):671‐681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Mahase E. Covid‐19: where are we on vaccines and variants? BMJ. 2021;372:n597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Sheikh A, McMenamin J, Taylor B, Robertson C. SARS‐CoV‐2 delta VOC in scotland: demographics, risk of hospital admission, and vaccine effectiveness. Lancet. 2021;397(10293):2461‐2462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Callaway E. Delta coronavirus variant: scientists brace for impact. Nature. 2021;595(7865):17‐18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Kriss JL, Hung M‐C, Srivastav A, et al. COVID‐19 vaccination coverage, by race and ethnicity—National immunization survey adult COVID module, United States, December 2020–November 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71(23):757‐763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Lind ML, Robertson AJ, Silva J, et al. Association between primary or booster COVID‐19 mRNA vaccination and omicron lineage BA. 1 SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in people with a prior SARS‐CoV‐2 infection: a test‐negative case–control analysis. PLoS Med. 2022;19(12):e1004136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Lai FTT, Huang L, Peng K, et al. Post‐Covid‐19‐vaccination adverse events and healthcare utilization among individuals with or without previous SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. J Intern Med. 2022;291(6):864‐869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Reddy KP, Fitzmaurice KP, Scott JA, et al. Clinical outcomes and cost‐effectiveness of COVID‐19 vaccination in South Africa. medRxiv. 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Watson OJ, Barnsley G, Toor J, Hogan AB, Winskill P, Ghani AC. Global impact of the first year of COVID‐19 vaccination: a mathematical modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22(9):1293‐1302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Magazzino C, Mele M, Coccia M. A machine learning algorithm to analyse the effects of vaccination on COVID‐19 mortality. Epidemiol Infect. 2022;150:e168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Matrajt L, Eaton J, Leung T, et al. Optimizing vaccine allocation for COVID‐19 vaccines shows the potential role of single‐dose vaccination. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):3449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Zavrakli E, Parnell A, Malone D, Duffy K, Dey S. Optimal age‐specific vaccination control for COVID‐19. PLoS One. 2023;18(9):e0290974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Coccia M. Optimal levels of vaccination to reduce COVID‐19 infected individuals and deaths: a global analysis. Environ Res. 2022;204(pt C):112314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Raut A, Samad A, Verma J, Kshirsagar P. Acceptance, hesitancy and refusal towards COVID‐19 vaccination. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2023;21:101283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Ali HT, Ashour Y, Rais MA, et al. Unravelling COVID‐19 vaccination attributes worldwide: an extensive review regarding uptake, hesitancy, and future implication. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023;85(7):3519‐3530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Komici K, Verderosa S, D'Amico F, Guerra G. Self‐reported side effects following COVID‐19 vaccination in athletes: a retrospective study. Hum Vaccines Immunother. 2023;19(2):2234788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Hosseini R, Askari N. A review of neurological side effects of COVID‐19 vaccination. Eur J Med Res. 2023;28(1):102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Coccia M. Improving preparedness for next pandemics: max level of COVID‐19 vaccinations without social impositions to design effective health policy and avoid flawed democracies. Environ Res. 2022;213:113566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Asresie MB, Fekadu GA, Dagnew GW. Urban‐rural disparities in immunization coverage among children aged 12‐23 months in Ethiopia: multivariate decomposition analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(1):969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Weekly epidemiological update on COVID‐19. World Health Organization. 2023. Accessed August 16, 2023. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update-on-covid-19---10-august-2021
  • 33. Vilches TN, Zhang K, Van Exan R, Langley JM, Moghadas SM. Projecting the impact of a two‐dose COVID‐19 vaccination campaign in Ontario, Canada. Vaccine. 2021;39(17):2360‐2365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. López F, Català M, Prats C, et al. A cost–benefit analysis of COVID‐19 vaccination in catalonia. Vaccines. 2021;10(1):59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Hall VJ, Foulkes S, Saei A, et al. COVID‐19 vaccine coverage in health‐care workers in England and effectiveness of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against infection (SIREN): a prospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet. 2021;397(10286):1725‐1735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Moghadas SM, Vilches TN, Zhang K, et al. The impact of vaccination on COVID‐19 outbreaks in the United States. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2021;73(12):2257‐2264. 10.1101/2020.11.27.20240051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Munir B, Santoso WM, Arisetijono E, Rianawati SB, Fahimma F, Maliga HA. Comparison of COVID‐19 vaccine's side effects between mRNA and inactivated virus vaccine for health workers. GSC Adv Res Rev. 2023;14(2):054‐058. [Google Scholar]
  • 38. McLean G, Kamil J, Lee B, et al. The impact of evolving SARS‐CoV‐2 mutations and variants on COVID‐19 vaccines. mBio. 2022;13(2):e02979‐21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Verma M, Sharma S, Kumar A, Hakim A, Bhansali S, Meena R. Comorbidities and vaccination status of COVID‐19 All‐Cause mortality at a tertiary care center of Western India. Cureus. 2022;14(1):e21721. 10.7759/cureus.21721 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Seneviratne SL, Yasawardene P, Wijerathne W, Somawardana B. COVID‐19 vaccination in cancer patients: a narrative review. J Int Med Res. 2022;50(3):03000605221086155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. De Rosa FG, Palazzo A, Rosso T, et al. Risk factors for mortality in COVID‐19 hospitalized patients in Piedmont, Italy: results from the multicenter, regional, CORACLE registry. J Clin Med. 2021;10(9):1951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Tenforde MW, Patel MM, Gaglani M, et al. Effectiveness of a third dose of Pfizer‐BioNTech and Moderna vaccines in preventing COVID‐19 hospitalization among immunocompetent and immunocompromised adults—United States, August–December 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71(4):118‐124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Wouters OJ, Shadlen KC, Salcher‐Konrad M, et al. Challenges in ensuring global access to COVID‐19 vaccines: production, affordability, allocation, and deployment. Lancet. 2021;397(10278):1023‐1034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Imai N, Hogan AB, Williams L, et al. Interpreting estimates of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) vaccine efficacy and effectiveness to inform simulation studies of vaccine impact: a systematic review. Wellcome Open Res. 2021;6(185):185. [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Kirsebom FC, Andrews N, Stowe J, et al. COVID‐19 vaccine effectiveness against the omicron (BA. 2) variant in England. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22(7):931‐933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. McDonnell A, Bogale F, Ababor S, et al. Understanding the cost‐effectiveness of COVID‐19 vaccination in Ethiopia. Center for Global Development. 2022.
  • 47. Ahmed T, Roberton T, Vergeer P, et al. Healthcare utilization and maternal and child mortality during the COVID‐19 pandemic in 18 low‐ and middle‐income countries: an interrupted time‐series analysis with mathematical modeling of administrative data. PLoS Med. 2022;19(8):e1004070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Moynihan R, Sanders S, Michaleff ZA, et al. Impact of COVID‐19 pandemic on utilisation of healthcare services: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2021;11(3):e045343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Kaso AW, Mohammed E, Agero G, et al. Assessment of hospitalisation costs and their determinants among Covid‐19 patients in South Central Ethiopia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(1):948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Coccia M. COVID‐19 pandemic over 2020 (with lockdowns) and 2021 (with vaccinations): similar effects for seasonality and environmental factors. Environ Res. 2022;208:112711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. AlShurman BA, Butt ZA. Proposing a new conceptual syndemic framework for COVID‐19 vaccine hesitancy: a narrative review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(2):1561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Coccia M. Sources, diffusion and prediction in COVID‐19 pandemic: lessons learned to face next health emergency. AIMS Public Health. 2023;10(1):145‐168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Coccia M. COVID‐19 vaccination is not a sufficient public policy to face crisis management of next pandemic threats. Public Organ Rev. 2023;23(4):1353‐1367. [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Benati I, Coccia M. Global analysis of timely COVID‐19 vaccinations: improving governance to reinforce response policies for pandemic crises. Int J Health Gov. 2022;27(3):240‐253. [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Coccia M. Effects of strict containment policies on COVID‐19 pandemic crisis: lessons to cope with next pandemic impacts. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2023;30(1):2020‐2028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Belzile MN, Lam P, Chan AK, et al. Evaluating the impact of a virtual outpatient care programme in preventing hospitalizations, emergency department visits and mortality for patients with COVID‐19: a matched cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023;29(7):933‐939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting information.

HSR2-7-e1914-s001.docx (72.8KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets gathered and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The corresponding author has full access to all of the data in this study and takes complete responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.


Articles from Health Science Reports are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES