Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 22;25:139. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-07968-3

Table 4.

Breakdown of implementation of the four case studies. Frequently mentioned facilitators and obstacles to each case study are presented below the implementation counts. *Potential facilitators as study has not been implemented widely

Total sites (N = 27) Progression criteria DAMOCLES Statistical analysis plans RECAP
graphic file with name 13063_2024_7968_Figa_HTML.gif graphic file with name 13063_2024_7968_Figb_HTML.gif graphic file with name 13063_2024_7968_Figc_HTML.gif graphic file with name 13063_2024_7968_Figd_HTML.gif graphic file with name 13063_2024_7968_Fige_HTML.gif
Facilitators

• Funder expectations (n = 8)

• Best practice (n = 4)

• Perceived as quality/useful (n = 4)

• Clear guidance with useful templates (n = 8)

• Best practice (n = 6)

• Standardisation (n = 6)

• Transparency/defining roles (n = 5)

• Standardisation (n = 9)

• Best practice (n = 7)

• Clear improvements to practice (n = 6)

• Perceived as quality/useful (n = 5)

• Best practice* (n = 5)

• Improve consistency in practice* (n = 2)

Obstacles

• No expertise/not typically involved in area (n = 8)

• Lack of awareness (n = 3)

• Time/resource limitations (n = 2)

• Other SOP already in use (n = 5)

• Time/resource limitations (n = 2)

• Lack of awareness (n = 13)

• Unclear how to implement (n = 2)