Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2001 Jan 22;268(1463):159–162. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1344

Pyrazine odour makes visually conspicuous prey aversive.

L Lindström 1, C Rowe 1, T Guilford 1
PMCID: PMC1088585  PMID: 11209885

Abstract

Unpalatable insects frequently adopt multimodal signals to ward off predators, incorporating sounds and odours into their colourful displays. Pyrazine is an odour commonly used in insect warning displays, and has previously been shown to elicit unlearned biases against common warning colours, e.g. yellow and red in naive predators. We designed two experiments to test for similar effects of pyrazine on the conspicuousness of prey, perhaps the most ubiquitous aspect of aposematic coloration. In the first experiment, we offered predators (Gallus gallus domesticus) a choice between conspicuous crumbs and cryptic crumbs in the presence or absence of pyrazine. In the second experiment, we manipulated the birds' experience of conspicuous prey during an initial training phase. Only in the presence of pyrazine did birds show a bias against conspicuously coloured food, and this occurred whether or not they had previously experienced food that contrasted with the background. This emergent behaviour relied upon the visual and odorous signal components being presented together. These unlearned, yet hidden, responses against conspicuousness demonstrate that there are initial benefits to prey being conspicuous when the multimodal nature of warning signals is accounted for.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (103.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Partan S., Marler P. Communication goes multimodal. Science. 1999 Feb 26;283(5406):1272–1273. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5406.1272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Rowe C, Guilford T. Novelty effects in a multimodal warning signal. Anim Behav. 1999 Feb;57(2):341–346. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Rowe C. Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals. Anim Behav. 1999 Nov;58(5):921–931. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Tullberg BS, Leimar O, Stille GG. Did aggregation favour the initial evolution of warning coloration? A novel world revisited. Anim Behav. 2000 Feb;59(2):281–287. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES