Abstract
The direct and indirect consequences of female copulatory behaviour for copulation success have seldom been quantified. In feral fowl, most copulations were forced by males and copulation success was determined by two factors. First, female differential resistance and solicitation directly affected copulation success and were displayed non-randomly with respect to male social status. Second, another female copulatory behaviour, the distress call, had an indirect effect on both copulation success and the quality of copulation partners. Distress calls triggered male attention to a copulation, which increased the probability of higher-ranking males than the copulating male disrupting the copulation and inseminating the calling female. Females preferentially uttered distress calls when mounted by low-ranking males. Both copulation resistance and distress calling influenced copulation success, but only distress calling increased the probability of copulation disruption by other males. Consistent with the effect of direct selection, differential distress calling indirectly biased copulation success in favour of dominant males. Female fowl may thus ameliorate the effect of male sexual coercion by manipulating male behaviour.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (124.8 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Altmann J. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour. 1974;49(3):227–267. doi: 10.1163/156853974x00534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chapman T., Liddle L. F., Kalb J. M., Wolfner M. F., Partridge L. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature. 1995 Jan 19;373(6511):241–244. doi: 10.1038/373241a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cunningham EJA, Birkhead TR. Sex roles and sexual selection. Anim Behav. 1998 Dec;56(6):1311–1321. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fischer R. B., Brown P. S. Vaginal secretions increase the likelihood of intermale aggression in Syrian hamsters. Physiol Behav. 1993 Aug;54(2):213–214. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(93)90101-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jennions M. D., Petrie M. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2000 Feb;75(1):21–64. doi: 10.1017/s0006323199005423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Partridge L., Hurst L. D. Sex and conflict. Science. 1998 Sep 25;281(5385):2003–2008. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5385.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pizzari T., Birkhead T. R. Female feral fowl eject sperm of subdominant males. Nature. 2000 Jun 15;405(6788):787–789. doi: 10.1038/35015558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Poston JP. Mate choice and competition for mates in the boat-tailed grackle. Anim Behav. 1997 Sep;54(3):525–534. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rice W. R. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature. 1996 May 16;381(6579):232–234. doi: 10.1038/381232a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Semple S. The function of Barbary macaque copulation calls. Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Feb 22;265(1393):287–291. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sheldon B. C. Sexually transmitted disease in birds: occurrence and evolutionary significance. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1993 Mar 29;339(1290):491–497. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1993.0044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wood-Gush D. G., Gilbert A. B. Oestrogen and the pre-laying behaviour of the domestic hen. Anim Behav. 1969 Aug;17(3):586–589. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(69)90167-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]