Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2001 Feb 7;268(1464):303–309. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1366

Microbial diversity, producer-decomposer interactions and ecosystem processes: a theoretical model.

M Loreau 1
PMCID: PMC1088607  PMID: 11217902

Abstract

Interactions between the diversity of primary producers and that of decomposers--the two key functional groups that form the basis of all ecosystems--might have major consequences on the functioning of depauperate ecosystems. I present a simple ecosystem model in which primary producers (plants) and decomposers (microbes) are linked through material cycling. The model considers a diversity of plant organic compounds and a diversity of microbial species. Nutrient recycling efficiency from organic compounds to decomposers is then the key parameter that controls ecosystem processes (primary productivity, secondary productivity, producer biomass and decomposer biomass). The model predicts that microbial diversity has a positive effect on nutrient recycling efficiency and ecosystem processes through either greater intensity of microbial exploitation of organic compounds or functional niche complementarity, much like in plants. Microbial niche breadth and overlap should not affect ecosystem processes unless they increase the number of organic compounds that are decomposed. In contrast, the model predicts that plant organic compound diversity can only have a negative effect or, at best, no effect on ecosystem processes, at least in a constant environment. This creates a tension between the effects of plant diversity and microbial diversity on ecosystem functioning, which may explain some recent experimental results.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (141.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Hector A, Schmid B, Beierkuhnlein C, Caldeira MC, Diemer M, Dimitrakopoulos PG, Finn JA, Freitas H, Giller PS, Good J. Plant diversity and productivity experiments in european grasslands. Science. 1999 Nov 5;286(5442):1123–1127. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5442.1123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Loreau M. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: a mechanistic model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 May 12;95(10):5632–5636. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.10.5632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Morin P. J. Ecology. The complexity of co-dependency. Nature. 2000 Feb 17;403(6771):718–719. doi: 10.1038/35001706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Naeem S., Hahn D. R., Schuurman G. Producer-decomposer co-dependency influences biodiversity effects. Nature. 2000 Feb 17;403(6771):762–764. doi: 10.1038/35001568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  6. Tilman D., Lehman C. L., Thomson K. T. Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Mar 4;94(5):1857–1861. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.5.1857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Yachi S., Loreau M. Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 16;96(4):1463–1468. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES