Abstract
Due to practical difficulties in obtaining direct genetic estimates of effective sizes, conservation biologists have to rely on so-called 'demographic models' which combine life-history and mating-system parameters with F-statistics in order to produce indirect estimates of effective sizes. However, for the same practical reasons that prevent direct genetic estimates, the accuracy of demographic models is difficult to evaluate. Here we use individual-based, genetically explicit computer simulations in order to investigate the accuracy of two such demographic models aimed at investigating the hierarchical structure of populations. We show that, by and large, these models provide good estimates under a wide range of mating systems and dispersal patterns. However, one of the models should be avoided whenever the focal species' breeding system approaches monogamy with no sex bias in dispersal or when a substructure within social groups is suspected because effective sizes may then be strongly overestimated. The timing during the life cycle at which F-statistics are evaluated is also of crucial importance and attention should be paid to it when designing field sampling since different demographic models assume different timings. Our study shows that individual-based, genetically explicit models provide a promising way of evaluating the accuracy of demographic models of effective size and delineate their field of applicability.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (179.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Chakraborty R., Neel J. V. Description and validation of a method for simultaneous estimation of effective population size and mutation rate from human population data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Dec;86(23):9407–9411. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.23.9407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chesser R. K., Rhodes O. E., Jr, Sugg D. W., Schnabel A. Effective sizes for subdivided populations. Genetics. 1993 Dec;135(4):1221–1232. doi: 10.1093/genetics/135.4.1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill W. G. Effective size of populations with overlapping generations. Theor Popul Biol. 1972 Sep;3(3):278–289. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(72)90004-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nei M. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Dec;70(12):3321–3323. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.12.3321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nei M., Chesser R. K. Estimation of fixation indices and gene diversities. Ann Hum Genet. 1983 Jul;47(Pt 3):253–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1983.tb00993.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Temporal genetic variation of mitochondrial DNA and the female effective population size of red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Mol Ecol. 1999 Jul;8(7):1223–1229. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00662.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waples R. S. A generalized approach for estimating effective population size from temporal changes in allele frequency. Genetics. 1989 Feb;121(2):379–391. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.2.379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whitlock M. C., Barton N. H. The effective size of a subdivided population. Genetics. 1997 May;146(1):427–441. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.1.427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian Populations. Genetics. 1931 Mar;16(2):97–159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/16.2.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wright S. Systems of Mating. V. General Considerations. Genetics. 1921 Mar;6(2):167–178. doi: 10.1093/genetics/6.2.167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]