Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2001 Feb 22;268(1465):347–355. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1381

Kin-selected conflict in the bumble-bee Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae).

A F Bourke 1, F L Ratnieks 1
PMCID: PMC1088613  PMID: 11270430

Abstract

Kin selection theory predicts conflict in social Hymenoptera between the queen and workers over male parentage because each party is more closely related to its own male offspring. Some aspects of the reproductive biology of the bumble-bee Bombus terrestris support kin selection theory but others arguably do not. We present a novel hypothesis for how conflict over male parentage should unfold in B. terrestris colonies. We propose that workers delay laying eggs until they possess information showing that egg laying suits their kin-selected interests. In colonies where queens start to lay haploid eggs early, we hypothesize that this occurs when workers detect the presence of queen-produced male brood in the brood's larval stage. In colonies where queens start to lay haploid eggs late, we hypothesize that it occurs when workers detect a signal from the queen to female larvae to commence development as queens. Our hypothesis accounts for previously unexplained aspects of the timing of reproductive events in B. terrestris, provides ultimate explanations for the results of a recent study of mechanisms underlying queen-worker conflict and helps explain this species' characteristic bimodal (split) sex ratios. Therefore, kin selection theory potentially provides a good explanation for reproductive patterns in B. terrestris.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (166.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bloch G. Regulation of queen-worker conflict in bumble-bee (Bombus terrestris) colonies. Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Dec 22;266(1437):2465–2469. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Estoup A., Scholl A., Pouvreau A., Solignac M. Monoandry and polyandry in bumble bees (Hymenoptera; Bombinae) as evidenced by highly variable microsatellites. Mol Ecol. 1995 Feb;4(1):89–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1995.tb00195.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. HEFETZ A., ROBINSON G. E., HUANG Z. -Y., BORST D. W., CNAANI J. Caste Determination in Bombus terrestris: Differences in Development and Rates of JH Biosynthesis between Queen and Worker Larvae. J Insect Physiol. 1997 Apr;43(4):373–381. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1910(96)00106-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hamilton W. D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):17–52. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90039-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Nonacs P., Carlin N. F. When can ants discriminate the sex of brood? A new aspect of queen-worker conflict. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Dec 15;87(24):9670–9673. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.24.9670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  7. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  9. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1997.0179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  10. Trivers R. L., Hare H. Haploidploidy and the evolution of the social insect. Science. 1976 Jan 23;191(4224):249–263. doi: 10.1126/science.1108197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES