Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2001 Feb 22;268(1465):357–361. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1377

Predator experience on cryptic prey affects the survival of conspicuous aposematic prey.

L Lindström 1, R V Alatalo 1, A Lyytinen 1, J Mappes 1
PMCID: PMC1088614  PMID: 11270431

Abstract

Initially, aposematism, which is an unprofitable trait, e.g. noxiousness conspicuously advertised to predators, appears to be a paradox since conspicuousness should increase predation by naive predators. However, reluctance of predators for eating novel prey (e.g. neophobia) might balance the initial predation caused by inexperienced predators. We tested the novelty effects on initial predation and avoidance learning in two separate conspicuousness levels of aposematic prey by using a 'novel world' method. Half of the wild great tits (Parus major) were trained to eat cryptic prey prior to the introduction of an aposematic prey, which potentially creates a bias against the aposematic morph. Both prey types were equally novel for control birds and they should not have shown any biased reluctance for eating an aposematic prey. Knowledge of cryptic prey reduced the expected initial mortality of the conspicuous morph to a random level whereas control birds initially ate the conspicuous morph according to the visibility risk. Birds learned to avoid conspicuous prey in both treatments but knowledge of cryptic prey did not increase the rate of avoidance learning. Predators' knowledge of cryptic prey did not reduce the predation of the less conspicuous aposematic prey and additionally predators did not learn to avoid the less conspicuous prey. These results indicate that predator psychology, which was shown as reluctance for attacking novel conspicuous prey, might have been important in the evolution of aposematism.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (124.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alatalo RV, Mappes J. Initial evolution of warning coloration: comments on the novel world method. Anim Behav. 2000 Jul;60(1):F1–F2. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BARNETT S. A. Experiments on neophobia in wild and laboratory rats. Br J Psychol. 1958 Aug;49(3):195–201. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1958.tb00657.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gamberale G., Tullberg B. S. Evidence for a peak-shift in predator generalization among aposematic prey. Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Oct 22;263(1375):1329–1334. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Osorio D., Jones C. D., Vorobyev M. Accurate memory for colour but not pattern contrast in chicks. Curr Biol. 1999 Feb 25;9(4):199–202. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80089-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Roper TJ, Marples NM. Odour and colour as cues for taste-avoidance learning in domestic chicks. Anim Behav. 1997 Jun;53(6):1241–1250. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rowe C, Guilford T. Novelty effects in a multimodal warning signal. Anim Behav. 1999 Feb;57(2):341–346. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES