Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2001 Mar 7;268(1466):499–508. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1373

How should we define fitness in structured metapopulation models? Including an application to the calculation of evolutionarily stable dispersal strategies.

J A Metz 1, M Gyllenberg 1
PMCID: PMC1088633  PMID: 11296862

Abstract

We define a fitness concept applicable to structured metapopulations consisting of infinitely many equally coupled patches. In addition, we introduce a more easily calculated quantity Rm that relates to fitness in the same manner as R0 relates to fitness in ordinary population dynamics: the Rm of a mutant is only defined when the resident population dynamics converges to a point equilibrium and Rm is larger (smaller) than 1 if and only if mutant fitness is positive (negative). Rm corresponds to the average number of newborn dispersers resulting from the (on average less than one) local colony founded by a newborn disperser. Efficient algorithms for calculating its numerical value are provided. As an example of the usefulness of these concepts we calculate the evolutionarily stable conditional dispersal strategy for individuals that can account for the local population density in their dispersal decisions. Below a threshold density x, at which staying and leaving are equality profitable, everybody should stay and above x everybody should leave, where profitability is measured as the mean number of dispersers produced through lines of descent consisting of non-dispersers.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (189.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dieckmann U., Law R. The dynamical theory of coevolution: a derivation from stochastic ecological processes. J Math Biol. 1996;34(5-6):579–612. doi: 10.1007/BF02409751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Diekmann O., Heesterbeek J. A., Metz J. A. On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio R0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations. J Math Biol. 1990;28(4):365–382. doi: 10.1007/BF00178324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jánosi I. M., Scheuring I. On the evolution of density dependent dispersal in a spatially structured population model. J Theor Biol. 1997 Aug 7;187(3):397–408. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1997.0434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  5. Parvinen K. Evolution of migration in a metapopulation. Bull Math Biol. 1999 May;61(3):531–550. doi: 10.1006/bulm.1999.0100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ronce O, Perret F, Olivieri I., I Evolutionarily Stable Dispersal Rates Do Not Always Increase with Local Extinction Rates. Am Nat. 2000 Apr;155(4):485–496. doi: 10.1086/303341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES