Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2001 Mar 7;268(1466):531–539. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1382

The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict.

S Gavrilets 1, G Arnqvist 1, U Friberg 1
PMCID: PMC1088637  PMID: 11296866

Abstract

Although empirical evidence has shown that many male traits have evolved via sexual selection by female mate choice, our understanding of the adaptive value of female mating preferences is still very incomplete. It has recently been suggested that female mate choice may result from females evolving resistance rather than attraction to males, but this has been disputed. Here, we develop a quantitative genetic model showing that sexual conflict over mating indeed results in the joint evolution of costly female mate choice and exaggerated male traits under a wide range of circumstances. In contrast to tradition explanations of costly female mate choice, which rely on indirect genetic benefits, our model shows that mate choice can be generated as a side-effect of females evolving to reduce the direct costs of mating.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (206.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arnqvist G, Nilsson T. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim Behav. 2000 Aug;60(2):145–164. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brooks R, Jennions MD. The dark side of sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Sep;14(9):336–337. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01689-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chapman T., Partridge L. Female fitness in Drosophila melanogaster: an interaction between the effect of nutrition and of encounter rate with males. Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Jun 22;263(1371):755–759. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Day T. Sexual selection and the evolution of costly female preferences: spatial effects. Evolution. 2000 Jun;54(3):715–730. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00074.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gavrilets S. Coevolutionary chase on exploiter-victim systems with polygenic characters. J Theor Biol. 1997 Jun 21;186(4):527–534. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1997.0426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gavrilets S. Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict. Nature. 2000 Feb 24;403(6772):886–889. doi: 10.1038/35002564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Holland B., Rice W. R. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Apr 27;96(9):5083–5088. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.9.5083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hurst L. D., Randerson J. P. An eXceptional chromosome. Trends Genet. 1999 Oct;15(10):383–385. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(99)01809-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Iwasa Y., Pomiankowski A. Continual change in mate preferences. Nature. 1995 Oct 5;377(6548):420–422. doi: 10.1038/377420a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Iwasa Y., Pomiankowski A. Good parent and good genes models of handicap evolution. J Theor Biol. 1999 Sep 7;200(1):97–109. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1999.0979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lande R. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jun;78(6):3721–3725. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.6.3721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Parker G. A., Partridge L. Sexual conflict and speciation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Feb 28;353(1366):261–274. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Partridge L., Hurst L. D. Sex and conflict. Science. 1998 Sep 25;281(5385):2003–2008. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5385.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rice W. R. Sexually antagonistic genes: experimental evidence. Science. 1992 Jun 5;256(5062):1436–1439. doi: 10.1126/science.1604317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rice W. R. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature. 1996 May 16;381(6579):232–234. doi: 10.1038/381232a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Roldan ER, Gomendio M. The Y chromosome as a battle ground for sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Feb;14(2):58–62. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01567-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES