Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2001 Mar 7;268(1466):541–547. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1388

Prey scan at random to evade observant predators.

J Scannell 1, G Roberts 1, J Lazarus 1
PMCID: PMC1088638  PMID: 11296867

Abstract

Anti-predator scans by animals occur with very irregular timing, so that the initiation of scans resembles a random, Poisson-like, process. At first sight, this seems both dangerous (predators could exploit the long intervals) and wastefull (scans after very short intervals are relatively uninformative). We explored vigilance timing using a new model that allows both predators and prey to vary their behaviour. Given predators that attack at random with respect to prey behaviour, constant inter-scan intervals minimize predation risk. However, if prey scan regularly to minimize their risk from randomly attacking predators, they become more vulnerable to predators that initiate attacks when the inter-scan intervals begin. If, in order to defeat this tactic, prey choose extremely variable inter-scan intervals, they become more vulnerable to predators who wait for long intervals before launching attacks. Only if predators can monitor the variability of inter-scan intervals and either attack immediately (if variability is too low) or wait for long intervals to attack (if variability is too high) does the empirically observed pattern of Poisson-like scanning become the optimal prey strategy.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (147.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Elgar M. A. Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1989 Feb;64(1):13–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1989.tb00636.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Lima SL, Bednekoff PA. Back to the basics of antipredatory vigilance: can nonvigilant animals detect attack? Anim Behav. 1999 Sep;58(3):537–543. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  4. Pulliam H. R. On the advantages of flocking. J Theor Biol. 1973 Feb;38(2):419–422. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(73)90184-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ruxton GD, Roberts G. Are vigilance sequences a consequence of intrinsic chaos or external changes? Anim Behav. 1999 Feb;57(2):493–495. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES