Abstract
The number and gender of offspring produced in a current reproductive event can affect a mother's future reproductive investment and success. I studied the subsequent reproductive outcome of pre-industrial (1752-1850) Finnish mothers producing twins versus singletons of differing gender. I predicted that giving birth to and raising twins instead of singletons, and males instead of females, would incur a greater reproductive effort and, hence, lead to larger future reproductive costs for mothers. I compared the mothers' likelihood of reproducing again in the future, their time to next reproduction and the gender and survival of their next offspring. I found that mothers who produced twins were more likely to stop breeding or breed unsuccessfully in the future as compared with women of a similar age and reproductive history who produced a same-gender singleton child. As predicted, the survival and gender of the offspring produced modified the costs of reproduction for the mothers. Giving birth to and raising males generally appeared to be the most expensive strategy, but this effect was only detected in mothers who produced twins and, thus, suffering from higher overall costs of reproduction.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (139.5 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Boesch C. Evidence for dominant wild female chimpanzees investing more in sons. Anim Behav. 1997 Oct;54(4):811–815. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cameron EZ, Linklater WL. Individual mares bias investment in sons and daughters in relation to their condition. Anim Behav. 2000 Sep;60(3):359–367. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clutton-Brock T. H., Albon S. D., Guinness F. E. Fitness costs of gestation and lactation in wild mammals. Nature. 1989 Jan 19;337(6204):260–262. doi: 10.1038/337260a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gabler S., Voland E. Fitness of twinning. Hum Biol. 1994 Aug;66(4):699–713. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill K., Kaplan H. Life history traits in humans: theory and empiricial studies. Annu Rev Anthropol. 1999;28:397–430. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.28.1.397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoffman H. J., Stark C. R., Lundin F. E., Jr, Ashbrook J. D. Analysis of birth weight, gestational age, and fetal viability, U. S. births, 1968. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1974 Sep;29(9):651–681. doi: 10.1097/00006254-197409000-00029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krackow S. Potential mechanisms for sex ratio adjustment in mammals and birds. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1995 May;70(2):225–241. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1995.tb01066.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lumey L. H., Stein A. D. In utero exposure to famine and subsequent fertility: The Dutch Famine Birth Cohort Study. Am J Public Health. 1997 Dec;87(12):1962–1966. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.12.1962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lummaa V., Haukioja E., Lemmetyinen R., Pikkola M. Natural selection on human twinning. Nature. 1998 Aug 6;394(6693):533–534. doi: 10.1038/28977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mace R., Sear R. Birth interval and the sex of children in a traditional African population: an evolutionary analysis. J Biosoc Sci. 1997 Oct;29(4):499–507. doi: 10.1017/s0021932097004999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marsál K., Persson P. H., Larsen T., Lilja H., Selbing A., Sultan B. Intrauterine growth curves based on ultrasonically estimated foetal weights. Acta Paediatr. 1996 Jul;85(7):843–848. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1996.tb14164.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- Parker A. J., Davies P., Mayho A. M., Newton J. R. The ultrasound estimation of sex-related variations of intrauterine growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Jul 15;149(6):665–669. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(84)90255-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trivers R. L., Hare H. Haploidploidy and the evolution of the social insect. Science. 1976 Jan 23;191(4224):249–263. doi: 10.1126/science.1108197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wells J. C. Natural selection and sex differences in morbidity and mortality in early life. J Theor Biol. 2000 Jan 7;202(1):65–76. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1999.1044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]