Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2001 Oct 22;268(1481):2163–2168. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1787

Postponed reproduction as an adaptation to winter conditions in Drosophila melanogaster: evidence for clinal variation under semi-natural conditions.

P Mitrovski 1, A A Hoffmann 1
PMCID: PMC1088861  PMID: 11600081

Abstract

Patterns of climatic adaptation in drosophila and other insects have largely been inferred from laboratory comparisons of traits that vary clinally. Here, we extend this research to comparisons under semi-natural conditions. To test for clinal variation in reproductive patterns and survival over winter, Drosophila melanogaster populations were initiated from seven collection sites along the eastern coast of Australia, ranging from tropical to temperate regions. The fecundity and survival of these populations were monitored in field cages at a temperate location until all adults had died more than 5 months later. Total fecundity showed a curvilinear relationship with latitude, due to higher egg production by high- and low-latitude populations. Adults from temperate locations survived winter conditions better than those from subtropical populations but not tropical ones. There was a linear cline in the timing of egg production: temperate populations produced eggs later than populations from lower latitudes. This cline is likely to be adaptive because egg-to-adult viability experiments indicated that only eggs laid in spring developed successfully to the adult stage. There was no evidence for climatic adaptation in the immature stages. The adult mortality rate increased gradually over winter, and in some populations was also correlated with the minimum ambient temperature. These results indicate that adaptation to winter conditions in D. melanogaster has involved shifts in reproductive patterns.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (151.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Coyne J. A., Beecham E. Heritability of two morphological characters within and among natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1987 Dec;117(4):727–737. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.4.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Huey R. B., Gilchrist G. W., Carlson M. L., Berrigan D., Serra L. Rapid evolution of a geographic cline in size in an introduced fly. Science. 2000 Jan 14;287(5451):308–309. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5451.308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. James A. C., Azevedo R. B., Partridge L. Cellular basis and developmental timing in a size cline of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1995 Jun;140(2):659–666. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.2.659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McColl G., McKechnie S. W. The Drosophila heat shock hsr-omega gene: an allele frequency cline detected by quantitative PCR. Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Nov;16(11):1568–1574. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Promislow D. E., Tatar M., Khazaeli A. A., Curtsinger J. W. Age-specific patterns of genetic variance in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Mortality. Genetics. 1996 Jun;143(2):839–848. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.2.839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Saunders D. S., Henrich V. C., Gilbert L. I. Induction of diapause in Drosophila melanogaster: photoperiodic regulation and the impact of arrhythmic clock mutations on time measurement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 May;86(10):3748–3752. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.10.3748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES