Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2001 Nov 7;268(1482):2189–2193. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1738

Do woodpecker finches acquire tool-use by social learning?

S Tebbich 1, M Taborsky 1, B Fessl 1, D Blomqvist 1
PMCID: PMC1088865  PMID: 11674865

Abstract

Tool-use is widespread among animals, but except in primates the development of this behaviour is poorly known. Here, we report on the first experimental study to our knowledge of the mechanisms underlying the acquisition of tool-use in a bird species. The woodpecker finch Cactospiza pallida, endemic to the Galápagos Islands, is a famous textbook example of tool-use in animals. This species uses modified twigs or cactus spines to pry arthropods out of tree holes. Using nestlings and adult birds from the field, we tested experimentally whether woodpecker finches learn tool-use socially. We show that social learning is not essential for the development of tool-use: all juveniles developed tool-use regardless of whether or not they had a tool-using model. However, we found that not all adult woodpecker finches used tools in our experiments. These non-tool-using individuals also did not learn this task by observing tool-using conspecifics. Our results suggest that tool-use behaviour depends on a very specific learning disposition that involves trial-and-error learning during a sensitive phase early in ontogeny.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (113.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beck B. B. Observation learning of tool use by captive Guinea baboons (Papio papio). Am J Phys Anthropol. 1973 Mar;38(2):579–582. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330380270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fritz J, Kotrschal K. Social learning in common ravens, Corvus corax. Anim Behav. 1999 Apr;57(4):785–793. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Glickman S. E., Sroges R. W. Curiosity in zoo animals. Behaviour. 1966;26(1):151–188. doi: 10.1163/156853966x00074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jones T. B., Kamil A. C. Tool-making and tool-using in the northern blue jay. Science. 1973 Jun 8;180(4090):1076–1078. doi: 10.1126/science.180.4090.1076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Nagell K., Olguin R. S., Tomasello M. Processes of social learning in the tool use of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and human children (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol. 1993 Jun;107(2):174–186. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.107.2.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Parker C. E. Behavioral diversity in ten species of nonhuman primates. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1974 Nov;87(5):930–937. doi: 10.1037/h0037228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Westergaard G. C., Lundquist A. L., Haynie M. K., Kuhn H. E., Suomi S. J. Why some capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) use probing tools (and others do not). J Comp Psychol. 1998 Jun;112(2):207–211. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.112.2.207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Whiten A., Custance D. M., Gomez J. C., Teixidor P., Bard K. A. Imitative learning of artificial fruit processing in children (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol. 1996 Mar;110(1):3–14. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.110.1.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Whiten A., Goodall J., McGrew W. C., Nishida T., Reynolds V., Sugiyama Y., Tutin C. E., Wrangham R. W., Boesch C. Cultures in chimpanzees. Nature. 1999 Jun 17;399(6737):682–685. doi: 10.1038/21415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES