Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2001 Nov 22;268(1483):2365–2374. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1822

Sexual and reproductive behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster from a microclimatically interslope differentiated population of "Evolution Canyon" (Mount Carmel, Israel).

K Iliadi 1, N Iliadi 1, E Rashkovetsky 1, I Minkov 1, E Nevo 1, A Korol 1
PMCID: PMC1088888  PMID: 11703877

Abstract

The strong microscale interslope environmental differences in "Evolution Canyon" provide an excellent natural model for sympatric speciation. Our previous studies revealed significant slope-specific differences for a fitness complex of Drosophila. This complex involved either adaptation traits (tolerance to high temperature, different viability and longevity pattern) or behavioural differentiation, manifested in habitat choice and non-random mating. This remarkable differentiation has evolved despite a very small interslope distance (a few hundred metres only). Our hypothesis is that strong interslope microclimatic contrast caused differential selection for fitness-related traits accompanied by behavioural differentiation and reinforced by some sexual isolation, which started incipient speciation. Here we describe the results of a systematic analysis of sexual behaviour in a non-choice situation and several reproductive parameters of D. melanogaster populations from the opposite slopes of "Evolution Canyon". The evidence indicates that: (i) mate choice derives from differences in mating propensity and discrimination; (ii) females from the milder north-facing slope discriminate strongly against males of the opposite slope; (iii) both sexes of the south-facing slope display distinct reproductive and behavioural patterns with females showing increased fecundity, shorter time before remating and relatively higher receptivity, and males showing higher mating propensity. These patterns represent adaptive life strategies contributing to higher fitness.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (336.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Casares P., Carracedo M. C., San Miguel E., Piñeiro R., Garcia-Florez L. Male mating speed in Drosophila melanogaster: differences in genetic architecture and in relative performance according to female genotype. Behav Genet. 1993 Jul;23(4):349–358. doi: 10.1007/BF01067436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jallon J. M. A few chemical words exchanged by Drosophila during courtship and mating. Behav Genet. 1984 Sep;14(5):441–478. doi: 10.1007/BF01065444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jamart J. A., Carracedo M. C., Casares P. Sexual isolation between Drosophila melanogaster females and D. simulans males. Male mating propensities versus success in hybridization. Experientia. 1993 Jul 5;49(6-7):596–598. doi: 10.1007/BF01955171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kessler S. The genetics of Drosophila mating behavior. II. The genetic architecture of mating speed in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1969 Jun;62(2):421–433. doi: 10.1093/genetics/62.2.421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Markow T. A. Mating preferences are not predictive of the direction of evolution in experimental populations of Drosophila. Science. 1981 Sep 18;213(4514):1405–1407. doi: 10.1126/science.213.4514.1405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nevo E. Evolution in action across phylogeny caused by microclimatic stresses at "Evolution Canyon". Theor Popul Biol. 1997 Dec;52(3):231–243. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1997.1330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nevo E. Evolution of genome-phenome diversity under environmental stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 May 22;98(11):6233–6240. doi: 10.1073/pnas.101109298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nevo E., Rashkovetsky E., Pavlicek T., Korol A. A complex adaptive syndrome in Drosophila caused by microclimatic contrasts. Heredity (Edinb) 1998 Jan;80(Pt 1):9–16. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00274.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Noor M. A. Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. Heredity (Edinb) 1999 Nov;83(Pt 5):503–508. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6886320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ritchie MG, Halsey EJ, Gleason JM. Drosophila song as a species-specific mating signal and the behavioural importance of Kyriacou & Hall cycles in D. melanogaster song. Anim Behav. 1999 Sep;58(3):649–657. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Schneider C. J. Natural selection and speciation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Nov 7;97(23):12398–12399. doi: 10.1073/pnas.240463297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Tauber C. A., Tauber M. J. A genetic model for sympatric speciation through habitat diversification and seasonal isolation. Nature. 1977 Aug 25;268(5622):702–705. doi: 10.1038/268702a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tauber C. A., Tauber M. J., Nechols J. R. Two genes control seasonal isolation in sibling species. Science. 1977 Aug 5;197(4303):592–593. doi: 10.1126/science.197.4303.592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Taylor C. E., Powell J. R. Microgeographic differentiation of chromosomal and enzyme polymorphisms in Drosophila persimilis. Genetics. 1977 Apr;85(4):681–695. doi: 10.1093/genetics/85.4.681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. del Solar E. Sexual isolation caused by selection for positive and negative phototaxis and geotaxis in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1966 Aug;56(2):484–487. doi: 10.1073/pnas.56.2.484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES