Abstract
Species-area models have become the primary tool used to predict baseline extinction rates for species in isolated habitats, and have influenced conservation and land-use planning worldwide. In particular, these models have been used to predict extinction rates following the loss or fragmentation of natural habitats in the absence of direct human influence on species persistence. Thus, where direct human influences, such as hunting, put added pressure on species in remnant habitat patches, we should expect to observe extinction rates higher than those predicted by simple species-area models. Here, we show that extinction rates for 41 species of large mammals in six nature reserves in West Africa are 14-307 times higher than those predicted by models based on reserve size alone. Human population and reserve size accounted for 98% of the observed variation in extinction rates between reserves. Extinction occurred at higher rates than predicted by species-area models for carnivores, primates and ungulates, and at the highest rates overall near reserve borders. Our results indicate that, where the harvest of wildlife is common, conservation plans should focus on increasing the size of reserves and reducing the rate of hunting.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (224.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bruner A. G., Gullison R. E., Rice R. E., da Fonseca G. A. Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science. 2001 Jan 5;291(5501):125–128. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5501.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cincotta R. P., Wisnewski J., Engelman R. Human population in the biodiversity hotspots. Nature. 2000 Apr 27;404(6781):990–992. doi: 10.1038/35010105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diamond J. M. Biogeographic kinetics: estimation of relaxation times for avifaunas of southwest pacific islands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Nov;69(11):3199–3203. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.11.3199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Myers N., Mittermeier R. A., Mittermeier C. G., da Fonseca G. A., Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 2000 Feb 24;403(6772):853–858. doi: 10.1038/35002501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Newmark W. D. A land-bridge island perspective on mammalian extinctions in western North American parks. 1987 Jan 29-Feb 4Nature. 325(6103):430–432. doi: 10.1038/325430a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pimm S. L., Askins R. A. Forest losses predict bird extinctions in eastern North America. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Sep 26;92(20):9343–9347. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.20.9343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pimm S. L., Raven P. Biodiversity. Extinction by numbers. Nature. 2000 Feb 24;403(6772):843–845. doi: 10.1038/35002708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pimm S. L., Russell G. J., Gittleman J. L., Brooks T. M. The future of biodiversity. Science. 1995 Jul 21;269(5222):347–350. doi: 10.1126/science.269.5222.347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simberloff D. S., Abele L. G. Island biogeography theory and conservation practice. Science. 1976 Jan 23;191(4224):285–286. doi: 10.1126/science.191.4224.285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Woodroffe R, Ginsberg JR. Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas . Science. 1998 Jun 26;280(5372):2126–2128. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5372.2126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]