Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2001 Dec 22;268(1485):2525–2529. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1814

Fruit or aposematic insect? Context-dependent colour preferences in domestic chicks.

G Gamberale-Stille 1, B S Tullberg 1
PMCID: PMC1088910  PMID: 11749705

Abstract

Colours are common stimuli in signalling systems. Requirements to function well as a signal sometimes conflict between different signallers, and the same colour stimulus is used to convey completely different messages to the same receiver. Fruits and aposematic insects both use red coloration as a signal, in the former case to signal profitability and in the latter case as a warning signal. In two experiments, we investigated whether the domestic chick, an omnivorous predator, differed in its unconditioned preference or avoidance of red and green stimuli depending on whether or not the stimulus was an insect. The experiments were designed as preference tests between red and green painted prey. The prey were live insects and artificial fruits (experiment 1), and, to investigate the effect of movement, live and dead insects (experiment 2). The chicks did not show any difference in pecking preference between red and green when fruit-like stimuli were used, but when the prey were insects, green prey were strongly preferred to red prey, and prey movement did not affect this bias. Thus, young chicks may recognize prey as insects and then discriminate between different prey colorations, or one type of food may elicit an unlearned colour preference-avoidance response that is absent with another type of food.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (266.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Fischer G. J., Morris G. L., Ruhsam J. P. Color pecking preferences in White Leghorn chicks. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1975 Jan;88(1):402–406. doi: 10.1037/h0076227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Lindström L., Rowe C., Guilford T. Pyrazine odour makes visually conspicuous prey aversive. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jan 22;268(1463):159–162. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  4. Roper TJ, Marples NM. Odour and colour as cues for taste-avoidance learning in domestic chicks. Anim Behav. 1997 Jun;53(6):1241–1250. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rowe C, Guilford T. Novelty effects in a multimodal warning signal. Anim Behav. 1999 Feb;57(2):341–346. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES