Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Health Services Research logoLink to Health Services Research
. 1999 Apr;34(1 Pt 2):349–363.

Conditional Length of Stay.

J H Silber 1, P R Rosenbaum 1, L F Koziol 1, N Sutaria 1, R R Marsh 1, O Even-Shoshan 1
PMCID: PMC1089006  PMID: 10199680

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and test a new outcome measure, Conditional Length of Stay (CLOS), to assess hospital performance when deaths are rare and complication data are not available. DATA SOURCES: The 1991 and 1992 MedisGroups National Comparative Data Base. STUDY DESIGN: We use engineering reliability theory traditionally applied to estimate mechanical failure rates to construct a CLOS measure. Specifically, we use the Hollander-Proschan statistic to test if LOS distributions display an "extended" pattern of decreasing hazards after a transition point, suggesting that "the longer a patient has stayed in the hospital, the longer a patient will likely stay in the hospital" versus an alternative possibility that "the longer a patient has stayed in the hospital, the faster a patient will likely be discharged from the hospital." DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Abstracted records from 7,777 pediatric pneumonia cases and 3,413 pediatric appendectomy cases were available for analysis. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: For both conditions, the Hollander-Proschan statistic strongly displays an "extended" pattern of LOS by day 3 (p<.0001) associated with declining rates of discharge. This extended pattern coincides with increasing patient complication rates. Worse admission severity and chronic disease contribute to lower rates of discharge after day 3. CONCLUSIONS: Patient stays tend to become prolonged after complications. By studying CLOS, one can determine when the rate of hospital discharge begins to diminish--without the need to directly observe complications. Policymakers looking for an objective outcome measure may find that CLOS aids in the analysis of a hospital's management of complicated patients without requiring complication data, thereby facilitating analyses concerning the management of patients whose care has become complicated.

Full text

PDF
349

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blumenthal D. Quality of health care. Part 4: The origins of the quality-of-care debate. N Engl J Med. 1996 Oct 10;335(15):1146–1149. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199610103351511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brewster A. C., Karlin B. G., Hyde L. A., Jacobs C. M., Bradbury R. C., Chae Y. M. MEDISGRPS: a clinically based approach to classifying hospital patients at admission. Inquiry. 1985 Winter;22(4):377–387. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fenn P., Davies P. Variations in length of stay. A conditional likelihood approach. J Health Econ. 1990 Sep;9(2):223–234. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(90)90019-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gabel J. Ten ways HMOs have changed during the 1990s. Health Aff (Millwood) 1997 May-Jun;16(3):134–145. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.16.3.134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goldfarb M. G., Coffey R. M. Change in the Medicare case-mix index in the 1980s and the effect of the prospective payment system. Health Serv Res. 1992 Aug;27(3):385–415. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Iezzoni L. I., Daley J., Heeren T., Foley S. M., Fisher E. S., Duncan C., Hughes J. S., Coffman G. A. Identifying complications of care using administrative data. Med Care. 1994 Jul;32(7):700–715. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199407000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Iezzoni L. I., Daley J., Heeren T., Foley S. M., Hughes J. S., Fisher E. S., Duncan C. C., Coffman G. A. Using administrative data to screen hospitals for high complication rates. Inquiry. 1994 Spring;31(1):40–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Iezzoni L. I., Hotchkin E. K., Ash A. S., Shwartz M., Mackiernan Y. MedisGroups data bases. The impact of data collection guidelines on predicting in-hospital mortality. Med Care. 1993 Mar;31(3):277–283. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Iezzoni L. I., Moskowitz M. A. A clinical assessment of MedisGroups. JAMA. 1988 Dec 2;260(21):3159–3163. doi: 10.1001/jama.260.21.3159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rosen A. K., Geraci J. M., Ash A. S., McNiff K. J., Moskowitz M. A. Postoperative adverse events of common surgical procedures in the Medicare population. Med Care. 1992 Sep;30(9):753–765. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199209000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rosenthal G. E., Shah A., Way L. E., Harper D. L. Variations in standardized hospital mortality rates for six common medical diagnoses: implications for profiling hospital quality. Med Care. 1998 Jul;36(7):955–964. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199807000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Silber J. H., Rosenbaum P. R. A spurious correlation between hospital mortality and complication rates: the importance of severity adjustment. Med Care. 1997 Oct;35(10 Suppl):OS77–OS92. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199710001-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Silber J. H., Rosenbaum P. R., Schwartz J. S., Ross R. N., Williams S. V. Evaluation of the complication rate as a measure of quality of care in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA. 1995 Jul 26;274(4):317–323. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Silber J. H., Rosenbaum P. R., Williams S. V., Ross R. N., Schwartz J. S. The relationship between choice of outcome measure and hospital rank in general surgical procedures: implications for quality assessment. Int J Qual Health Care. 1997 Jun;9(3):193–200. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/9.3.193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Silber J. H., Williams S. V., Krakauer H., Schwartz J. S. Hospital and patient characteristics associated with death after surgery. A study of adverse occurrence and failure to rescue. Med Care. 1992 Jul;30(7):615–629. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199207000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Steen P. M., Brewster A. C., Bradbury R. C., Estabrook E., Young J. A. Predicted probabilities of hospital death as a measure of admission severity of illness. Inquiry. 1993 Summer;30(2):128–141. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Thomas J. W., Ashcraft M. L. Measuring severity of illness: six severity systems and their ability to explain cost variations. Inquiry. 1991 Spring;28(1):39–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Williams S., Pauly M. V., Rosenbaum P. R., Ross R., Schwartz J. S., Shpilsky A., Silber J. H. Ranking hospitals by the quality of care for medical conditions: the role of complications. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 1996;107:263–274. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Health Services Research are provided here courtesy of Health Research & Educational Trust

RESOURCES