Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To discuss the value of promoting coexistent and complementary relationships between qualitative and quantitative research methods as illustrated by presentations made by four respected health services researchers who described their experiences in multi-method projects. DATA SOURCES: Presentations and publications related to the four research projects, which described key substantive and methodological areas that had been addressed with qualitative techniques. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Sponsor interest in timely, insightful, and reality-anchored evidence has provided a strong base of support for the incorporation of qualitative methods into major contemporary policy research studies. In addition, many issues may be suitable for study only with qualitative methods because of their complexity, their emergent nature, or because of the need to revisit and reexamine previously untested assumptions. CONCLUSION: Experiences from the four projects, as well as from other recent health services studies with major qualitative components, support the assertion that the interests of sponsors in the policy realm and pressure from them suppress some of the traditional tensions and antagonisms between qualitative and quantitative methods.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Berkwits M., Inui T. S. Making use of qualitative research techniques. J Gen Intern Med. 1998 Mar;13(3):195–199. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00054.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown R. S., Clement D. G., Hill J. W., Retchin S. M., Bergeron J. W. Do health maintenance organizations work for Medicare? Health Care Financ Rev. 1993 Fall;15(1):7–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gold M. R. Effects of the growth of managed care on academic medical centers and graduate medical education. Acad Med. 1996 Aug;71(8):828–838. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199608000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Halverson P. K., Mays G. P., Kaluzny A. D., Richards T. B. Not-so-strange bedfellows: models of interaction between managed care plans and public health agencies. Milbank Q. 1997;75(1):113–138. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kondratas A., Weil A., Goldstein N. Assessing the new federalism: an introduction. Health Aff (Millwood) 1998 May-Jun;17(3):17–24. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.17.3.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Levinson W., Roter D. L., Mullooly J. P., Dull V. T., Frankel R. M. Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. JAMA. 1997 Feb 19;277(7):553–559. doi: 10.1001/jama.277.7.553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCormack L. A., Garfinkel S. A., Schnaier J. A., Lee A. J., Sangl J. A. Consumer information development and use. Health Care Financ Rev. 1996 Fall;18(1):15–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robinson J. C., Casalino L. P. Vertical integration and organizational networks in health care. Health Aff (Millwood) 1996 Spring;15(1):7–22. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.15.1.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roter D., Frankel R. Quantitative and qualitative approaches to the evaluation of the medical dialogue. Soc Sci Med. 1992 May;34(10):1097–1103. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90283-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ventres W. B., Frankel R. M. Ethnography: a stepwise approach for primary care researchers. Fam Med. 1996 Jan;28(1):52–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zuckerman H. S., Hilberman D. W., Andersen R. M., Burns L. R., Alexander J. A., Torrens P. Physicians and organizations: strange bedfellows or a marriage made in heaven? Front Health Serv Manage. 1998 Spring;14(3):3–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]