Skip to main content
Health Services Research logoLink to Health Services Research
. 2000 Dec;35(5 Pt 1):995–1010.

Heritability of self-reported health.

J C Romeis 1, J F Scherrer 1, H Xian 1, S A Eisen 1, K Bucholz 1, A C Heath 1, J Goldberg 1, M J Lyons 1, W G Henderson 1, W R True 1
PMCID: PMC1089180  PMID: 11130808

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the contribution of genes and environmental factors to variation in a common measure (i.e., a five-point--excellent, very good, good, fair, and poor--Likert scale) of self-reported health. DATA SOURCES: Data were analyzed from 4,638 male-male twin pair members of the Vietnam Era Twin (VET) Registry who responded to a 1987 health survey. STUDY DESIGN: Varying models for the relationship between genetic and environmental influences on self-reported health were tested in an attempt to explain the relative contributions of additive genetic, shared and nonshared environmental effects, and health conditions reported since 1975 to perceived health status. DATA COLLECTION: A mail and telephone survey of health was administered in 1987 to VET Registry twins. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Variance component estimates under the best-fitting model included a 39.6 percent genetic contribution to self-reported health. In a model which included the effect of health condition, genes accounted for 32.5 percent and health condition accounted for 15.0 percent of the variance in self-reported health. The magnitude of the genetic contribution to perceived health status was not significantly different in a model with or without health condition. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest over one-third of the variability of self-reported health can be attributed to genes. Since perceived health status is a major predictor of morbidity, mortality, and health services utilization, future analyses should consider the role of heritable influences on traditional health services variables.

Full text

PDF
995

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersen R. M. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav. 1995 Mar;36(1):1–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andresen E. M., Rothenberg B. M., Kaplan R. M. Performance of a self-administered mailed version of the Quality of Well-Being (QWB-SA) questionnaire among older adults. Med Care. 1998 Sep;36(9):1349–1360. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199809000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barsky A. J., Cleary P. D., Klerman G. L. Determinants of perceived health status of medical outpatients. Soc Sci Med. 1992 May;34(10):1147–1154. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90288-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergner M., Bobbitt R. A., Kressel S., Pollard W. E., Gilson B. S., Morris J. R. The sickness impact profile: conceptual formulation and methodology for the development of a health status measure. Int J Health Serv. 1976;6(3):393–415. doi: 10.2190/RHE0-GGH4-410W-LA17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bergner M., Rothman M. L. Health status measures: an overview and guide for selection. Annu Rev Public Health. 1987;8:191–210. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.08.050187.001203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Coe R. M. The magic of science and the science of magic: an essay on the process of healing. J Health Soc Behav. 1997 Mar;38(1):1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eisen S., Neuman R., Goldberg J., Rice J., True W. Determining zygosity in the Vietnam Era Twin Registry: an approach using questionnaires. Clin Genet. 1989 Jun;35(6):423–432. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1989.tb02967.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eisen S., True W., Goldberg J., Henderson W., Robinette C. D. The Vietnam Era Twin (VET) Registry: method of construction. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma) 1987;36(1):61–66. doi: 10.1017/s0001566000004591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eisen S., True W., Goldberg J., Henderson W., Robinette C. D. The Vietnam Era Twin (VET) Registry: method of construction. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma) 1987;36(1):61–66. doi: 10.1017/s0001566000004591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ferraro K. F. Self-ratings of health among the old and the old-old. J Health Soc Behav. 1980 Dec;21(4):377–383. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Greenfield S., Nelson E. C. Recent developments and future issues in the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settings. Med Care. 1992 May;30(5 Suppl):MS23–MS41. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199205001-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Harris J. R., Pedersen N. L., McClearn G. E., Plomin R., Nesselroade J. R. Age differences in genetic and environmental influences for health from the Swedish Adoption/Twin Study of Aging. J Gerontol. 1992 May;47(3):P213–P220. doi: 10.1093/geronj/47.3.p213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Heath A. C., Eaves L. J., Nance W. E., Corey L. A. Social inequality and assortative mating: cause or consequence? Behav Genet. 1987 Jan;17(1):9–17. doi: 10.1007/BF01066007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Henderson W. G., Eisen S., Goldberg J., True W. R., Barnes J. E., Vitek M. E. The Vietnam Era Twin Registry: a resource for medical research. Public Health Rep. 1990 Jul-Aug;105(4):368–373. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hidding A., de Witte L., van der Linden S. Determinants of self-reported health status in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 1994 Feb;21(2):275–278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Idler E. L., Benyamini Y. Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav. 1997 Mar;38(1):21–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kawachi I., Kennedy B. P., Glass R. Social capital and self-rated health: a contextual analysis. Am J Public Health. 1999 Aug;89(8):1187–1193. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.8.1187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lichtenstein P., Harris J. R., Pedersen N. L., McClearn G. E. Socioeconomic status and physical health, how are they related? An empirical study based on twins reared apart and twins reared together. Soc Sci Med. 1993 Feb;36(4):441–450. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90406-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Malmström M., Sundquist J., Johansson S. E. Neighborhood environment and self-reported health status: a multilevel analysis. Am J Public Health. 1999 Aug;89(8):1181–1186. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.8.1181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McHorney C. A., Kosinski M., Ware J. E., Jr Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey. Med Care. 1994 Jun;32(6):551–567. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199406000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. McHorney C. A., Ware J. E., Jr, Raczek A. E. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993 Mar;31(3):247–263. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199303000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Miilunpalo S., Vuori I., Oja P., Pasanen M., Urponen H. Self-rated health status as a health measure: the predictive value of self-reported health status on the use of physician services and on mortality in the working-age population. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 May;50(5):517–528. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00045-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mossey J. M., Shapiro E. Self-rated health: a predictor of mortality among the elderly. Am J Public Health. 1982 Aug;72(8):800–808. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.8.800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nickens H. W. The role of race/ethnicity and social class in minority health status. Health Serv Res. 1995 Apr;30(1 Pt 2):151–162. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Svärdh C., Isacson D., Pedersen N. L. Self-rated health among cardiovascular drug users in a study of Swedish twins. Scand J Soc Med. 1998 Sep;26(3):223–231. doi: 10.1177/14034948980260030101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. True W. R., Romeis J. C., Heath A. C., Flick L. H., Shaw L., Eisen S. A., Goldberg J., Lyons M. J. Genetic and environmental contributions to healthcare need and utilization: a twin analysis. Health Serv Res. 1997 Apr;32(1):37–53. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ware J. E., Jr, Sherbourne C. D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473–483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Health Services Research are provided here courtesy of Health Research & Educational Trust

RESOURCES