Skip to main content
Mycobiology logoLink to Mycobiology
. 2024 Feb 7;52(1):51–57. doi: 10.1080/12298093.2024.2305515

Novel Sarcoscypha Species from National Parks in Korea: Sarcoscypha humida sp. nov.

Minseo Cho a, Young Mok Heo b, Yeongseon Jang c, Changmu Kim d, Sun Lul Kwon e,, Jae-Jin Kim a,
PMCID: PMC10896156  PMID: 38415176

Abstract

Sarcoscypha (Sarcoscyphaceae, Pezizales) is a saprobic fungus characterized by the cup or disc-shaped blight red apothecium and oblong to ellipsoid ascospores. The 18 species of Sarcoscypha were known to occur in Europe, North America, and tropical Asia. However, up to date, only two Sarcoscypha species have been reported in Korea. In this study, novel Sarcoscypha specimens were collected from Juwangsan, Odaesan, and Taebaeksan National Parks from September to October in Korea. This species is well distinguished from other Sarcoscypha species according to the molecular and phylogenetic analysis based on internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region. Here, we provided detailed descriptions with illustrations and a phylogenetic tree to report our specimens as novel Sarcoscypha species.

Keywords: Ascomycota, ascospore, ITS, phylogeny, Sarcoscyphaceae

1. Introduction

The genus Sarcoscypha (Fries.) Boud., which belongs to the Sarcoscyphaceae, Pezizales, Pezizomycetes, and Ascomycota, was established more than 130 years ago [1]. This genus is a general decomposer on beech, elm, hazel, willow, oak, and rose family, which forms blight red apothecium surface; cup or disc or saucer-shape apothecium; and oblong to ellipsoid ascospores [2,3]. According to the Index Fungorum database, about 82 species were listed in the genus Sarcoscypha (Index Fungorum: http://www.indexfungorum.org, accessed August 2023). However, many species remain unknown or recognized as other genera of the Sarcoscyphaceae, or other families of the Pezizales, even the Helotiales [2]. Baral [2] recognized that 18 species are provisionally accepted as Sarcoscypha species which are distributed in North America, Europe, and tropical Asia. However, 20 taxa can be tentatively assigned into the genus to date because Sarcoscypha chudei was re-classified as Kompsoscypha chudei [4], and three novel Sarcoscypha species were additionally reported from Africa and Taiwan after 2011 [3,5]. Although 10 species are known to be distributed in Asia, only two species have been recorded in Korea (Sarcoscypha coccinea and S. hosoyae) [6].

Traditionally, the genus Sarcoscypha has been classified through morphological analysis and taxonomic identification and requires fresh specimens due to the plasticity of the specimens [7]. The fresh materials provide reliable taxonomical keys (e.g., spore guttulation) to distinguish the taxa from different environments [7,8]. However, it is not easy to obtain fresh materials, so additional classification methods are needed. In the previous study, the genus Sarcoscypha was identified using molecular DNA-based analysis with the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region, and it was confirmed that they form the core clade of Sarcoscypha and have a phylogenetic relationship [3,9,10]. These results support successfully to report novel Sarcoscypha species [3].

The National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR) has conducted a project to survey them in the national parks, in Korea. During the study, novel Sarcoscypha species candidates were collected from three different national parks. We performed morphological and molecular analysis for the accurate identification of Sarcoscypha specimens. Here, we present them as a novel species and provide a detailed description of novel Sarcoscypha species based on the morphological characteristics.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Sampling

Sampling was conducted in Juwangsan National Park on October 11 2019 and October 30 2021. The specimens NIBRFG0000509969 and NIBRFG0000510138 were found on dead hardwood branches near the gorge. We desiccated the sample in a drying oven at 60 °C for 24 h. Subsequently, the samples were stored in zipper bags with silica gel. The additional dried specimens were obtained from the NIBR. One was found near the Danggol Valley in Taebaeksan National Park on October 30 2019 and the other was collected from Needle fir (Abies holophylla MAX.) forest beside of valley in Odaesan National Park on September 8 2017. The specimens are deposited in the herbarium of the NIBR.

2.2. Molecular approach

DNA extraction was conducted using the AccuPrep Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Bioneer, Daejeon, South Korea) from the dried specimens according to the manufacturer’s protocol. PCR for the ITS region was carried out according to the previously described method with primer pairs ITS1F/ITS5 and ITS4/LR3 [11–13]. Sequencing of the PCR amplicons was performed by Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, South Korea). The large subunit rRNA (LSU), RNA polymerase II (RPB2), and the translation elongation factor-1 alpha (TEF-1α) sequence regions were additionally amplified to provide sequence information of type material following the previously described method with primer pairs: LR0R/L5 for LSU, fRPB2-5f/fRPB2-7cR for RPB2, and 983F/2218R for TEF-1α region, respectively [12,14–16].

For phylogenetic analysis, the closest relative sequences of Sarcoscypha and two outgroup sequences were obtained from the NCBI GenBank database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/). The obtained ITS sequences were assembled, proofread, and edited using MEGA v. 7 and were aligned using MAFFT 7.130 [17,18]. The alignment was checked by eye and was manually adjusted. The phylogenetic analyses were performed by MrBayes 3.2.3 on XSEDE with a total of 20,000,000 generations with sampling every 1000 generations for Bayesian inference (BI) [19]. jModeltest 2.1.10 with the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) with default options was used to test the best-fitting DNA substitution models [20]. The model for ITS was K80 + G. The phylogenetic analysis was also conducted by RAxML v. 7.03 with GTR + G model of the evolution and 1000 bootstrap replicates for maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis [21]. The first 25% of trees were eliminated as burn-in and constructed a 50% majority rule consensus tree. All phylogenetic analyses were conducted on the CIPRES web portal [22]. Phylogenetic tree editing was conducted using FigTree-version 1.4.3 [23] and Adobe Illustrator CS6 (Adobe Systems, Inc., San Jose, CA). The sequences used for phylogenetic analysis were listed with GenBank accession number in Table 1.

Table 1.

The list of Sarcoscypha species in this study for phylogenetic analysis.

Identity Strain no. Country ITS References
Sarcoscypha austriaca CUP 63162 USA U66011 [10]
  CUP 62771 Norway U66010 [10]
  mh 193 Slovakia U66012 [10]
Sarcoscypha coccinea CUP 63157 USA U66014 [10]
  CUP 62113 USA U66013 [10]
  CUP 63160 USA U66015 [10]
Sarcoscypha dudleyi CUP 62775 USA U66018 [10]
  mh 192 USA U66019 [10]
Sarcoscypha emarginata CUP 62723 Luxembourg U66020 [10]
  HB2861 Switzerland U66021 [10]
Sarcoscypha hosoyae TRL 456 Japan U66031 [10]
Sarcoscypha humberiana TNM F28630 China KT716833 [3]
  CUP 63489 China U66028 [10]
Sarcoscypha javensis HMAS 61198 China U66026 [10]
Sarcoscypha humida NIBRFG0000509969 Korea MW116458 This study
  NIBRFG0000509970 Korea MW116459 This study
  NIBRFG0000504788 Korea MW116460 This study
  NIBRFG0000510138 Korea OL439727 This study
Sarcoscypha korfiana mh 705 AF026308 [28]
  HMAS 61202 China U66027 [10]
Sarcoscypha macaronesica CUP MM 2628 Canary Islands U66022 [10]
  TFC MIC 6460 Canary Islands U66023 [10]
Sarcoscypha mesocyatha TNM F3688 China KT936558 [3]
  TNM F5134 China KT936559 [3]
  CUP 62699 USA U66029 [10]
Sarcoscypha minuta TNM F28831 China KT716834 [3]
Sarcoscypha occidentalis CUP 62777 USA U66024 [10]
  CUP 63484 USA U66025 [10]
Sarcoscypha tatakensis TNM F0754 China KT716835 [3]
  TNM F0993 China KT716836 [3]
Pithya cupressina mh 208 USA AF006316 [10]
Pithya vulgaris RK 90001 U66008 [10]

The strains in this study are shown in bold.

2.3. Morphological analysis

The macro-morphological characteristics of the species were observed simultaneously with sampling. The color of the macroscopic structures in descriptions follows Ridgway [24]. The microscopic feature observation was performed from slide preparations of dried specimens mounted in distilled water using an Olympus BX51 light microscope (Tokyo, Japan). The 5% potassium hydroxide (KOH) was treated to examine the guttulation of dried ascospores. At least 30 ascospores and asci structures were measured. In this paper, the following abbreviations are used to indicate the size of spores: L = mean of spore length, W = mean of spore width, n = number of spores from a given specimen, and Q = variation in the L/W ratios.

3. Results

3.1. Phylogenetic analyses

The genomic DNA sequences of the ITS of the four specimens were obtained from Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, South Korea). The ITS phylogeny contained 32 sequences, including Pithya vulgaris and P. cupressina as outgroup taxa. The ML analysis and the Bayesian analysis showed the same tree topology, and the ML tree is represented (Figure 1). In the phylogeny, most of the Sarcoscypha species were well divided at the species level, except S. austriaca and S. humberiana. The closely related species of novel candidate S. humida sp. nov. are S. hosoyae (97.83% identity in the ITS sequence matrix), S. dudleyi (96.39% identity in the ITS sequence matrix), and S. emarginata (95.83% identity in the ITS sequence matrix). Sarcoscypha humida sp. nov. was clearly separated from other taxa with high support value (PP: 0.91/BP: 91%) (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Maximum-likelihood (ML) tree based on the ITS rDNA region. The numbers at the nodes indicate the Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) >0.70 and ML bootstrap proportion (BP) >70% as PP/BP. The Pithya species are used as outgroup. The specimens examined in this study are shown in red colored bold. The scale bar indicates the nucleotide substitutions per position.

3.2. Taxonomy

Sarcoscypha humida M. Cho, S.L. Kwon & J.J. Kim, sp. nov. (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Sarcoscypha humida: (a) fresh apothecia of specimen; (b) longitudinal section of apothecia; (c) dried apothecia of mature specimen; (d) dried ascospores; (e) dead ascospores; (f) operculum; (g) paraphyses; (h) asci with eight spores; (i) medullary excipulum; (j) ectal excipulum.

MycoBank: MB 840449.

Type: KOREA, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Cheongsong-gun, Juwangsan National Park, Mount Juwang, Jeolgol gorge, 36°24′10.33″N, 129°10′25.33″E, elev. 387 m, October 11 2019, Sun Lul Kwon, on dead wood branch (Holotype: NIBRFG0000509969; GenBank: ITS, MW116458; LSU, OR882785; RPB2, OR871740; TEF-1α, OR871739).

Etymology: Name refers to the habitat characteristic where this species is commonly found, typically in humid sites such as valleys or gorges.

Diagnosis: This species is diagnosed by irregularly narrow cup-shaped and sessile to subsessile apothecia with light salmon-orange surface in macroscopic characters, and slightly longer paraphyses than asci and ellipsoidal ascospores in microscopic characters.

Apothecia solitary to scattered, first cyathiform, then irregularly narrow cup-shaped at the mature stage, 5–40 mm diam, sessile to subsessile. Disc concave, flame scarlet inner surface, and light salmon-orange surface. Margin crenulate, first curved to center, then irregularly wavy in old specimens, inrolled when dry. External hairs abundant, distributed on receptacle in young stage, covering the external surface of apothecia surface in mature stage, smooth, straight to flexuous, 3.3–5.1 μm wide. Ectal excipulum thin, 97–138 μm thick, textura porrecta, hyphae 2–3.5 μm wide, parallel to outer surface. Medullary excipulum 200–250 μm thick, hyphae tightly arranged, 2.5–3.5 μm wide. Asci 8 – spored, cylindrical, 230–320 × 10.3–15.7 μm with rounded end. Ascospores smooth, hyaline, inamyloid, (11–)13.5–17(–21.5) × (5–)6.0–7.5(–8.5) μm, L = 15.5 μm, W = 6.9 μm, Q = (1.5–)1.9–2.5(–3.7) (n = 79/2), ellipsoid to broadly ellipsoid. Paraphyses filiform, septate, slightly longer than asci, 2–3 μm wide, slightly capitate tips, filled with red pigment.

Additional specimens examined: KOREA, Odaesan-ro, Jinbumyeon, Pyeongchang-gun, Odaesan National Park, Mount Odae, 37°43′37.59″N, 128°35′44.1″E, elev. 650 m, September 8 2017, Changmu Kim, on dead wood (NIBRFG0000504788); KOREA, Sodo-dong, Taebaek-si, Taebaeksan National Park, Mount Taebaek, October 30 2019, Changmu Kim, on dead wood branch (NIBRFG0000509970); KOREA, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Cheongsong-gun, Juwangsan National Park, Mount Juwang, Jeolgol gorge, 36°24′12″N, 129°10′19.4″E, October 30 2021, Sun Lul Kwon, on dead wood branch (NIBRFG0000510138).

Notes. The spore guttulation of S. humida sp. nov. was not observed. Sarcoscypha humida is closely related to S. hosoyae and S. dudleyi. in the phylogenetic analysis (Figure 1). However, both S. hosoyae (22–38(–45) × 9–12 μm) and S. dudleyi (25–33 × 12–14 μm) can be distinguished from S. humida by the length of ascospore [10,25]. The apothecia shape of S. humida is similar to S. knixoniana F.A. Harr. However, S. knixoniana is distinguished by the presence of stipitate and short paraphyses, and wider ascospore [10].

4. Discussion

To our best knowledge, a total of 20 species have been tentatively recognized as Sarcoscypha species. Sarcoscypha javensis Höhn. and S. macaronesica Baral & Korf can be distinguished from S. humida sp. nov. by phylogenetic analysis. They were in the core clade of Sarcoscypha and were delimited from S. humida with high support value (Figure 1). Sarcoscypha macaronesica Baral & Korf has ellipsoidal ascospores (21)22–23–29–33(40) × (8.5)9–11(13) μm [8]. Thus, it can be distinguished from S. humida by larger ascospore. Sarcoscypha vassiljevae has been studied with phylogenetic analysis using ITS in previous research [9,10]. The results show that S. vassiljevae is located outside of the core clade. This species can be delimited by morphological features, such as longer ascospores and asci, white color apothecia, and stipitate structure [26]. Sarcoscypha serrata (Le Gal) Eckblad can be delimited by the yellow color of the hymenium, strongly serrated-crenate margin, and short stipe [27].

The specimens of S. humida were collected from three different national parks in Korea during the fall season (September to October). They were found on dead hardwood branches near the wet areas (e.g., Jeolgol gorge). Its closely related species, S. hosoyae F.A. Harr., is also found in cool and wet areas at the Kamataki waterfall, Japan, in February. Sarcoscypha dudleyi (Peck) Baral. is also found in the cool area of the Rocky Mountains in spring. These results indicated that Sarcoscypha species in the S. humida clade is likely to occur near the wet area and prefer cool weather. Meanwhile, the spore guttulation of S. humida was not observed after 24 h desiccation of S. humida specimens. According to the previous study, large polar guttules can be found even with dried materials [10]. It might indicate that the spores of S. humida have low drying tolerance.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we collected four Sarcoscypha specimens from three different national parks during the fall season in Korea. These four specimens are found near wet areas such as valleys and gorges. This species is taxonomically analyzed using morphological and phylogenetic methods. Phylogenetically, Sarcoscypha humida is closely related to S. hosoyae and S. dudleyi. They are found in wet and cool regions like S. humida. Morphologically, S. humida has a similar apothecia shape to S. knixoniana. Here, the morphological characteristics of novel candidate S. humida with detailed illustrations were provided. This is the third report on Sarcoscypha species in Korea.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by a grant of National Institute of Biological Resources, funded by the Ministry of Environment of the Republic of Korea (NIBR202304104).

Disclosure statement

Y.M. Heo is employed by COSMAX BTI. The rest of the authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationship that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Boudier JLÉ. Nouvelle classification naturelle des Discomycetes charnus connus generalement sous le nom de Pezizes. Bull Soc Mycol France. 1885;1(1):91–120. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Baral HO. The European and North-American species of Sarcoscypha. 2004. Tübingen. Available from: http://www.gbif-mycology.de/HostedSites/Baral/index.html.
  • 3.Wang Y-Z, Huang C-L, Wei J-L.. Two new species of Sarcoscypha (Sarcosyphaceae, Pezizales) from Taiwan. Phytotaxa. 2016;245(2):169. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.245.2.8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tabarés M, Rius J, Rocabruna A.. Fongs nous o poc citats a Catalunya. XII. Rev Catal Micol. 2010;32:13–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tibuhwa DD. Morphology and taxonomy of Sarcoscypha ololosokwaniensis sp. nov.: a new Ascomycota species from Serengeti National Park-Tanzania. J Yeast Fung Res. 2011;2:1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kim C, Min Y, Lee JS. Studies of unrecorded or novel mushroom species survey (III). Incheon (Korea): National Institute of Biological Resources; 2015. p. 28–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Harrington F. Sarcoscypha in North America Pezizales, Sarcoscyphaceae. Mycotaxon. 1990;38:417–458. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Baral H. Taxonomische und ökologische Studien über Sarcoscypha coccinea agg., Zinnoberrote Kelchbecherlinge (Kurzfassung). Zeitschrift für Mykol. 1984;50:117–145. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Harrington FA. Relationships among Sarcoscypha species: evidence from molecular and morphological characters. Mycologia. 1998;90(2):235–243. doi: 10.2307/3761299. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Harrington FA, Potter D.. Phylogenetic relationships within Sarcoscypha based upon nucleotide sequences of the internal transcribed spacer of nuclear ­ribosomal DNA. Mycologia. 1997;89(2):258–267. doi: 10.2307/3761080. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gardes M, Bruns TD.. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes—application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol. 1993;2(2):113–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1993.tb00005.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vilgalys R, Hester M.. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J Bacteriol. 1990;172(8):4238–4246. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, et al. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, et al., editors. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego (CA): Academic Press. Vol. 18; 1990. p. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liu YJ, Whelen S, Hall BD.. Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerase II subunit. Mol Biol Evol. 1999;16(12):1799–1808. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rehner SA, Buckley E.. A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-α sequences: evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia. 2005;97(1):84–98. doi: 10.3852/mycologia.97.1.84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zeng M, Gentekaki E, Hyde KD, et al. Phylogeny and morphology of novel species and new collections related to Sarcoscyphaceae (Pezizales, Ascomycota) from Southwestern China and Thailand. Biology. 2023;12(1):130. doi: 10.3390/biology12010130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Katoh K, Toh H.. Parallelization of the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(15):1899–1900. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K.. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33(7):1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP.. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003;19(12):1572–1574. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Darriba D, Taboada G, Doallo R, et al. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods. 2012;9(8):772. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2006;22(21):2688–2690. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Miller M, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T.. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Gateway Comput Environ Workshop. 2010;2010:1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rambaut A. FigTree-version 1.4.3, a graphical viewer of phylogenetic trees; 2017. Available from: http://treebioedacuk/software/figtree.
  • 24.Ridgway R. Color standards and color nomenclature. Washington (DC): The Author; 1912. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kuo M. Sarcoscypha dudleyi; 2012. Available from: MushroomExpert.Com
  • 26.Zhuang W, Yu Z, Wang Z.. Flora fungorum sinicorum. Vol. 21. Hyaloscyphaceae, Sarcoscyphaceae Et Sarcosomataceae. Beijing (China): Science Press; 2004. In Chinese. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Le Gal M. Les Discomycetes de Madagascar. Paris (France): Laboratoire de Cryptogamie du Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle; 1953. p. 465. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Harrington FA, Pfister DH, Potter D, et al. Phylogenetic studies within the Pezizales. I. 18S rRNA sequence data and classification. Mycologia. 1999;91:41–45. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mycobiology are provided here courtesy of Korean Society of Mycology

RESOURCES