ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Chronic kidney disease is a major cause of mortality with a prevalence of 6%. Over the past half-century, hemodialysis has been the most preferred modality of treatment for sustaining the life of patients with end-stage kidney disease. Despite hemodialysis being freely available, achieving adequacy in hemodialysis is a challenging task. Inadequate dialysis is responsible for the high mortality. This study aimed to find out the mean value of the urea reduction ratio among patients undergoing hemodialysis at a tertiary care centre.
Methods:
This was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted from 15 January 2023 to 15 April 2023. Ethical approval was taken from Institutional Review Committee (Reference number: UCMS/IRC/044/23). Patients aged >18 years, undergoing maintenance hemodialysis and giving informed and written consent were included in the study. Urea reduction rate and single-pool Kt/V were estimated. Convenience sampling method was used.
Results:
Among 100 patients, the mean urea reduction ratio among the study population was 25.24±15.59%. Males represented 62 (62%) of the study population. The mean age was 47.9±14.74 years. Hypertension and Diabetes mellitus was found to be the leading cause of end-stage kidney disease with 61 (61%) and 27 (27%) respectively. The mean value of spKT/V was 0.73±0.162.
Conclusions:
The mean urea reduction ratio was found to be lower than the other studies done in similar settings.
Keywords: chronic kidney disease, dialysis, hemodialysis
INTRODUCTION
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an emerging disease with a prevalence of 6% in Nepal.1 Over the past halfcentury, there has been a remarkable achievement in hemodialysis (HD) as a modality for renal replacement therapy.2 Beginning from the initiation of hemodialysis at Bir Hospital in 1987,3 Government of Nepal has been providing free hemodialysis since 2016.4 According to Renal Physicians Association and the National Kidney Foundation's disease outcomes quality initiative, dialysis adequacy is estimated by calculating urea reduction ratio (URR) and/or KT/V where (K: clearance of urea, T: duration of dialysis, V: distribution of urea).5
Due to logistics and financial constraints, most hemodialysis centres are providing twice-a-week hemodialysis and reusing dialysers which may affect the quality of hemodialysis.6,7 It is imperative to know the quality of HD provided at individual centres. Hence, we designed this study to estimate URR and single pool KT/V in patients undergoing HD.
This study aimed to find out the mean value of the urea reduction ratio among patients undergoing hemodialysis at a tertiary care centre.
METHODS
This was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted from 15 January 2023 to 15 April 2023 under the Nephrology unit, Department of Internal Medicine at Universal College of Medical Sciences, Bhairahawa, Rupandehi, Nepal. Ethical approval was taken from the Institutional Review Committee of the same institute (Reference number: UCMS/IRC/044/23). Patients aged >18 years, undergoing maintenance hemodialysis and giving informed and written consent were enrolled in the study. Those who did not give informed consent were excluded. Convenience sampling was done and the sample size was calculated using the formula:
Where,
n = minimum required sample size
Z = 1.96 at 95% Confidence interval (CI)
σ = standard deviation is taken as 21.48 from published literature8
q = 1-p
e = margin of error, 5%
Here, the minimum required sample size was 71. However, 100 sample size was taken. The measurement of blood urea before and after dialysis was done and the calculation of URR and spKT/V was done using the formulas mentioned below:
Urea Reduction Ratio (URR)
Single-Pool Index (spKt/V)
Parameters spKt/V and URR are connected mathematically as follows:
SpKt/V = - In (1 - URR),
Where In stands for natural logarithm.
Several studies have shown that if the rate of KT/V reaches 1.2 or URR is more than 65%, this is effective in improving dialysis patients' prognosis.5
The available demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters were recorded as per the proforma. Data were entered and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 17.0.
RESULTS
A total of 100 participants were enrolled in the study. About 62 (62%) were males (Table 1).
Table 1. Baseline characteristics (n = 100).
Characteristics | Categories | n (%) |
---|---|---|
Age (years) | 18-39 | 30 (30) |
40-59 | 47 (47) | |
≥ 60 | 23 (23) | |
Gender | Male | 62 (62) |
Female | 38 (38) | |
Religion | Hindu | 90 (90) |
Muslim | 9 (9) | |
Buddhist | 1 (1) | |
Education | Illiterate | 27 (27) |
Up to secondary education | 60 (60) | |
Above secondary education | 13 (13) | |
Hemodialysis frequency | Once a week | 4 (4) |
Twice a week | 62 (62) | |
Three times a week | 34 (34) | |
Type of Vascular access | Radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula | 50 (50) |
Brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula | 29 (29) | |
Internal Jugular Catheter | 21 (21) |
The mean URR among the study population was 25.24±15.59% whereas spKT/V was 0.73±0.162 (Table 2).
Table 2. Mean URR and spKT/V based on gender (n = 100).
Characteristics | spKT/V Mean±SD (%) | Urea Reduction Ratio Mean±SD (%) |
---|---|---|
Male | 0.739±0.161 | 24.76±15.08 |
Female | 0.735±0.166 | 26.02±16.5) |
Hypertension was present in 61 (61%) patient's requiring hemodialysis (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Underlying conditions (n= 100).
The mean Hemoglobin level is 8.11±1.83 gm/dl (Table 3).
Table 3. Laboratory parameters (n= 100).
Laboratory parameters | Mean±SD |
---|---|
Hemoglobin (gm/dl) | 8.11±1.83 |
Serum Calcium (mg/dl) | 8.06±0.43 |
Serum Phosphorous (mg/dl) | 7.39±2.50 |
Serum albumin (gm/dl) | 3.21±0.45 |
Iron Saturation (%) | 28.48±3.45 |
Pre-HD Serum Urea (mg/dl) | 176.12±59.70 |
Post HD Serum Urea (mg/dl) | 130.88±52.19 |
Pre HD serum Creatinine | 10.70±4.26 |
Post-HD Serum Creatinine | 9.52±4.02 |
Mean URR among patient undergoing hemodialysis thrice a week is 23.07±15.05 and mean spKT/V was 0.75±0.17 (Table 4).
Table 4. Mean URR and spKT/V according to the number of HD sessions per week (n= 100).
Characteristics | Once a week (n = 4) | Twice a week (n = 62) | Thrice a week (n = 34) |
---|---|---|---|
Urea reduction ratio (%) | 26.72±17.20 | 26.33±15.92 | 23.07±15.05 |
Single pool spKt/V | 0.72±0.17 | 0.73±0.15 | 0.75±0.17 |
Vascular accesses used for hemodialysis were arteriovenous fistula which included Radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (RCAVF) 50 (50%), brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (BCAVF) 29 (29%) and temporary internal jugular venous catheter (IJV) 21 (21%) (Table 5).
Table 5. Mean URR and spKT/V as per vascular access for HD (n= 100).
Type of vascular access | spKT/V Mean±SD (%) | Urea Reduction Ratio Mean±SD (%) |
---|---|---|
RC AVF | 0.71±0.16 | 27.30±15.72 |
BC AVF | 0.78±0.15 | 19.70±13.52 |
IJ Catheter | 0.71±0.12 | 27.97±16.70 |
DISCUSSION
This study highlighted the importance of estimation of URR and calculating spKT/V in patients undergoing hemodialysis. In our study of 100 hemodialysis patients, males were more in number 62 (62%) than females 38 (38%), which was similar to a study done in Chitwan, Nepal.9 The mean age of patients in our study was 47.9±14.7 years which was similar to other studies.10 The commonest cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in our study was hypertension 61 (61%) followed by type 2 diabetes mellitus 27 (27%) and chronic glomerulonephritis 6 (6%) whereas in another study it was found that diabetic nephropathy followed by hypertension were common causes of ESKD.11,12 On the contrary, another study found chronic glomerulonephritis to be the most common cause followed by diabetic nephropathy.13 Mean Hemoglobin level in our study population was found to be 8.11±1.83 gm/dl which was similar to the study done at a centre in Kathmandu.14 The mean calcium level in the study population was found to be 8.06±0.43 mg/dl which is similar to findings in a retrospective study conducted at KIST Medical College Teaching Hospital.15 Similar results were also observed in a study from Bir Hospital.16 Hypocalcaemia is a part of abnormal mineral metabolism in CKD and evident from stage 4 CKD.17 Analysis of our data showed mean pre-dialysis urea was 176.12±59.70 mg/dl and mean post-dialysis urea was 130.88±52.19 mg/dl. Reanalysis of the primary data from the national cooperative dialysis study showed that Kt/V <0.8 was associated with a relatively high rate of patient morbidity, whereas Kt/V values between 1.0 and 1.2 were associated with better outcomes.18
Mean URR in our study was 25.24±15.59 % and Mean Kt/v as assessed by Jindal's equation was 0.73±0.162. This was lower than a study from Nepal where the mean URR was 65.3% and mean Kt/v was 0.99.19 Similar discrepancy was also seen in a study conducted at the Institute of Medicine, Maharajgunj where the mean spKt/V and URR were 1.15±0.3 and 60.35±9.26% respectively.20 Various factors are accountable for lower URR and spKt/V. The average time of dialysis treatment received by patients could be actually less than the prescribed treatment time. The length of each hemodialysis session and low-flux membranes used for HD could be a justifiable reason for such discrepancies in various studies. Patients could not reach the dialysis unit at the scheduled time or had to leave before the completion of the prescribed time due to transportation and scheduled timing issues. Hence considering these factors for lower values of URR and spKt/V, it is necessary to take measures to improve the quality of dialysis.
Limitations such as confounding factors for Kt/V were not collected in this study which includes albumin, ferritin, residual renal function, and other comorbidities of the study population.
CONCLUSIONS
The mean urea reduction ratio was found to be lower than the other studies done in similar settings.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Our sincere gratitude to the nursing staff of the hemodialysis unit at UCMS for helping us throughout the study. The authors would also like to thank the patients for participating in this study
Conflict of Interest
None.
REFERENCES
- 1.Dhimal M, Karki KB, Sharma SK, Aryal KK, Shrestha N, Poudyal A, et al. Prevalence of selected chronic non-communicable diseases in Nepal. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2019 Nov 14;17(3):394–401. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v17i3.2327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Himmelfarb J, Ikizler TA. Hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 2010 Nov 4;363(19):1833–45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0902710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chhetri PK, Satyal PR, Kafle R, Khakurel S, Pradhan BR. Experience of hemodialysis in Bir Hospital. Nepal Med Coll J. 1999;1:99–101. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mcgee J, Pandey B, Maskey A, Frazer T, Mackinney T. Free dialysis in Nepal: logistical challenges explored. Hemodial Int. 2018 Jul;22(3):283–89. doi: 10.1111/hdi.12629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Barzegar H, Moosazadeh M, Jafari H, Esmaeili R. Evaluation of dialysis adequacy in hemodialysis patients: a systematic review. Urol J. 2016 Aug 25;13(4):2744–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Manandhar DN, Chhetri PK, Tiwari R, Lamichhane S. Evaluation of dialysis adequacy in patients under hemodialysis and effectiveness of dialysers reuses. Nepal Med Coll J. 2009 Jun 1;11(2):107–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hakim RM, Breyer J, Ismail N, Schulman G. Effects of dose of dialysis on morbidity and mortality. Am J Kidney Dis. 1994 May;23(5):661–9. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6386(12)70276-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rajbhandari A, Bhusal U, Shrestha DB, Yadav J, Singh S, Pant C, Sharma A. End stage renal disease among patients undergoing haemodialysis at a tertiary care centre: a descriptive cross-sectional study. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2022 May 5;60(249):448–52. doi: 10.31729/jnma.7258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ghimire M, Vaidya S, Upadhyay HP. Clinicodemographic profile and outcome of maintenance hemodialysis patients in a tertiary hospital of central Nepal, Chitwan. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2020 Jan.-Mar;18(69):9–14. doi: 10.3126/kumj.v18i1.33338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Al Wakeel JS, Mitwalli AH, Al Mohaya S, Abu-Aisha H, Tarif N, Malik GH, et al. Morbidity and mortality in ESRD patients on dialysis. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2002 October-December;13(4):473–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chaudhari ST, Sadavarte AV, Chafekar D. Clinical profile of end stage renal disease in patients undergoing hemodialysis. MVP Journal of Medical Sciences. 2017 May 1;:8–13. doi: 10.18311/mvpjms/0/v0/i0/8555. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jha V. Current status of end-stage renal disease care in India and Pakistan. Kidney International Supplements. 2013 May 1;3(2):157–60. doi: 10.1038/kisup.2013.3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sathyan S, George S, Vijayan P, Jayakumar M. Clinical and epidemiological profile of chronic kidney disease patients in a tertiary care referral centre in South India. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health. 2016 Dec 22;3(12):3487–92. doi: 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20164279. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Poudel B, Yadav BK, Jha B, Raut KB, Pandeya DR. Prevalence and association of anemia with CKD: a hospital based cross sectional study from Nepal. Biomed Res. 2013 Jan 1;24(1):99–103. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Singh S, Upadhyay-Dhungel K, Aryal G. Value of calcium and phosphorous in chronic kidney disease patients under hemodialysis: a retrospective study. Journal of Pathology of Nepal. 2012 Sep 25;2(4):293–6. doi: 10.3126/jpn.v2i4.6881. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rajbhandari A, Agrawal RK, Baral A, Pokhrel A, Shrestha D, Hada R. Estimation of serum vitamin D, calcium and phosphorus in chronic kidney disease. Medical Journal of Shree Birendra Hospital. 2017 Aug 21;16(1):30–6. doi: 10.3126/mjsbh.v16i1.17266. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for bone metabolism and disease in chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003 Oct;42(4 Suppl 3):S1–201. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6386(03)00905-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gotch FA, Sargent JA. A mechanistic analysis of the National Cooperative Dialysis Study (NCDS). Kidney Int. 1985 Sep;28(3):526–34. doi: 10.1038/ki.1985.160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sultania P, Acharya PS, Sharma SK. Adequacy of hemodialysis in Nepalese patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2009 Jan-Mar;48(173):10–3. doi: 10.31729/jnma.179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.DS S. Dialysis adequacy in ESRD patients on maintenance hemodialysis in a tertiary care center. Journal of Institute of Medicine. 2017 Aug 1;39(2) [Google Scholar]