Abstract
Autophagy is initiated by the assembly of multiple autophagy-related proteins that form the phagophore assembly site where autophagosomes are formed. Atg13 is essential early in this process, and a hub of extensive phosphorylation. How these multiple phosphorylations contribute to autophagy initiation, however, is not well understood. Here we comprehensively analyze the role of phosphorylation events on Atg13 during nutrient-rich conditions and nitrogen starvation. We identify and functionally characterize 48 in vivo phosphorylation sites on Atg13. By generating reciprocal mutants, which mimic the dephosphorylated active and phosphorylated inactive state of Atg13, we observe that disrupting the dynamic regulation of Atg13 leads to insufficient or excessive autophagy, which are both detrimental to cell survival. We furthermore demonstrate an involvement of Atg11 in bulk autophagy even during nitrogen starvation, where it contributes together with Atg1 to the multivalency that drives phase separation of the phagophore assembly site. These findings reveal the importance of post-translational regulation on Atg13 early during autophagy initiation, which provides additional layers of regulation to control bulk autophagy activity and integrate cellular signals.
Keywords: Autophagy, PAS Formation, Atg1 Kinase Complex, Atg13, Atg11
Subject terms: Autophagy & Cell Death, Post-translational Modifications & Proteolysis, Signal Transduction
Synopsis
A proteomics approach identifies 48 phosphorylation sites on Atg13, crucial for regulating bulk autophagy initiation. Disrupting Atg13’s dynamic phosphorylation leads to harmful autophagic outcomes, emphasizing the importance of precise post-translational control in regulating bulk autophagy activity.
Extensive post-translational regulation on Atg13 is important early during autophagy initiation.
Disrupting the dynamic regulation of Atg13 leads to insufficient or excessive autophagy.
Atg11 is involved in bulk autophagy also during nitrogen starvation, where it contributes together with Atg1 to the multivalency that drives phase separation of the phagophore assembly site.
A proteomics approach identifies 48 phosphorylation sites on Atg13, crucial for regulating bulk autophagy initiation. Disrupting Atg13’s dynamic phosphorylation leads to harmful autophagic outcomes, emphasizing the importance of precise post-translational control in regulating bulk autophagy activity.
Introduction
Eukaryotic cells respond to nutrient starvation by induction of bulk autophagy, a catabolic process that non-selectively degrades and recycles bulk cytosolic components. During bulk autophagy, a membrane structure is formed de-novo, expanded, and sealed to engulf a part of the cytosol in a double-membrane vesicle termed autophagosome. Fusion of the autophagosome with compartments of the endolysosomal system leads to the degradation of the inner autophagic membrane and the entrapped cytosolic material. The thereby generated molecular building blocks are exported into the cytosol and become available to the cell once again (Hollenstein and Kraft, 2020).
Under nutrient-rich conditions, bulk autophagy is inhibited by the action of the nutrient sensor Tor kinase complex 1 (TORC1) (Papinski and Kraft, 2016; Noda and Ohsumi, 1998) TORC1 acts on the autophagy machinery by hyper phosphorylating Atg13, which prevents the assembly of Atg13 with autophagy-related (Atg) factors and thereby pathway initiation. When starvation inhibits TORC1 activity, Atg13 undergoes rapid dephosphorylation, allowing its stable assembly with the autophagy machinery to form the phagophore assembly site (PAS) and initiate autophagosome formation (Kamada et al, 2000).
Atg13 plays a crucial role in autophagy by forming a complex with Atg1, the homolog of mammalian ULK1 and a key protein kinase involved in autophagy. This complex interacts with the dimeric Atg17-Atg29-Atg31 (Atg17-Atg29-Atg31) complex, resulting in the formation of an Atg1-Atg13-Atg17-Atg29-Atg31 supramolecular assembly, known as the Atg1 complex, or ULK1 complex in mammals (Kabeya et al, 2009; Young et al, 2006). The multivalent interaction of Atg17 with Atg13 drives the phase separation of the Atg1 complex, thereby forming the early bulk autophagy PAS (Fujioka et al, 2020). The resulting liquidity of the PAS has been proposed to be critical for the subsequent recruitment of other Atg proteins, which promotes PAS assembly and initiates autophagosome formation.
Atg13 cross-links Atg17-Atg29-Atg31 complexes via two distinct binding regions, termed LR (linking region, Atg13359-389) and BR (binding region, Atg13424-436, Fig. 1A). In both of these regions, TORC1-dependent phosphorylation regulates the interaction with Atg17, on Ser379 and Ser428/Ser429, respectively (Fujioka et al, 2014; Yamamoto et al, 2016). Similarly, five TORC1-dependent serine phosphorylations have been mapped in the Atg1-interaction region of Atg13 (MIM, Fig. 1A). A mutant that mimics the phosphorylated, inactive state of Atg13 (Atg135SD), however, only caused a 25% bulk autophagy defect; and the non-phosphorylatable, reciprocal Atg135SA mutant was unable to increase the affinity of Atg13 to Atg1 (Fujioka et al, 2014). Another study mutated eight phosphorylation sites distributed all over Atg13. This Atg138SA mutant resulted in functional bulk autophagy and was even capable of inducing bulk autophagy under nutrient-rich conditions when overexpressed, suggesting that it can bypass the inhibitory activity of TORC1. However, the reciprocal allele Atg138SD which mimics the phosphorylated, inactive state, was unable to efficiently inhibit bulk autophagy (Kamada et al, 2010). As neither of these mutants were able to mimic reciprocal states, it remains unclear whether the dephosphorylation and phosphorylation of a specific set of residues on Atg13 is sufficient for the induction and inhibition of the autophagy pathway, and how other autophagy factors are influenced by these phosphorylation events. Moreover, a multitude of additional phosphorylation sites on Atg13 have been identified in vivo, but not functionally analyzed, further supporting the notion that Atg13 regulation by phosphorylation is far from being understood (Hu et al, 2019). We, therefore, conducted an extensive investigation into the effects of Atg13 phosphorylation. A total of 48 phosphorylation sites on Atg13 were identified in vivo by mass spectrometry analysis. Mutating most of these sites to non-phosphorylatable or phospho-mimetic residues resulted in a hyperactive or fully inhibited state of autophagy, respectively. Thus, Atg13 acts as a signaling hub that can promote or inhibit autophagy, depending on its phosphorylation state. Furthermore, a comprehensive mutational analysis uncovered the crucial contributions of Atg1 and Atg11 to the formation of the bulk autophagy PAS, contributing to the phase transition of the Atg1 complex. Collectively, these results provide compelling evidence for the critical involvement of numerous phosphorylation events on Atg13 in precisely regulating the initiation of bulk autophagy.
Results
Atg13 is a heavily phosphorylated protein, whose phosphorylation status regulates bulk autophagy activity (Kamada et al, 2000). Despite numerous phospho-mapping studies, the functional significance of most phosphorylation events remains unknown. To address how Atg13 phosphorylation affects autophagy activity, we reinvestigated the effect of phospho-mimetic mutants in the Atg17-LR and Atg17-BR regions, on Ser379, Ser428, and Ser429 (Fig. 1A,B). A phospho-mimetic mutant of Ser428 and Ser429 (Atg13S428D/S429D) showed a severe defect in the autophagy flux, assessed by monitoring the vacuolar delivery of Pho8∆60, in comparison to wild-type Atg13 (wt, Atg13wt) (Noda and Klionsky, 2009), in agreement with a previous report (Fujioka et al, 2014, Fig. 1C). To our surprise, a phosphomimetic mutant of Ser379, Atg13S379D showed almost no impact on autophagy activity in a wild-type background (Fig. 1D). This is in contrast to a previous report (Yamamoto et al, 2016), which, however, only analyzed this mutant in the absence of Atg11, a protein considered to mainly affect selective, but not bulk autophagy. Indeed, in atg11∆ cells, the Ser379D mutation showed an enhanced defect on the autophagic flux of about 50%, similar to previous reports (Fig. 1D, Yamamoto et al, 2016). Thus, Ser428 and Ser429 phosphorylation, but not Ser379 phosphorylation, appears sufficient to inhibit bulk autophagic flux. These findings suggest that deletion of ATG11 in combination with other mutations of the core autophagy machinery can have synthetic defects on bulk autophagy. We, therefore, performed our further analysis of Atg13 in bulk autophagy in Atg11-expressing cells.
Atg13 is a phosphorylation hub with a major impact on the autophagy flux
As many more phosphorylation sites on Atg13 than Ser379, Ser428, and Ser429 have been reported (Hu et al, 2019; Fujioka et al, 2014; Yamamoto et al, 2016), we reassessed Atg13 phosphorylation under nutrient-rich and starvation conditions (Dataset EV1). We mapped 48 phosphorylation sites by mass spectrometry, of which 36 were regulated by the nutrient status. Among these sites were also the previously reported sites Ser379, Ser428, and Ser429. Most regulated phosphorylation sites were present under nutrient-rich conditions and reduced or absent upon starvation, except for two sites that were reversely regulated (Fig. 1A,B).
To investigate the impact of these additional phosphorylation sites on the autophagic flux, we excluded Ser428 and Ser429 from our mutational analysis. These two serine residues are crucial for hydrogen bonding with Atg17 and therefore significantly affect the autophagy flux when mutated either to alanine or aspartate (Fig. 1C, Fujioka et al, 2014). By excluding them, we aimed to investigate the effect of the other phosphorylation sites independent of their known role in Atg17 binding. We created a phosphomimetic Atg13 mutant, Atg1344D, in which the 44 sites phosphorylated under nutrient-rich conditions, excluding Ser428/Ser429, were mutated to phosphomimetic aspartate residues, but the two sites that were upregulated only upon starvation, S344 and S496, were mutated to non-phosphorylatable alanine. We also created a mutant that included the Ser428 and Ser429 to aspartate mutations and termed it Atg1346D (which also includes the S344A and S496A mutations among the 46 aspartate substitutions). Throughout this study, mutated versions of Atg13 were either stably integrated at the native ATG13 locus in the genome, or expressed from a centromeric plasmid containing the native ATG13 promoter in an atg13∆ deletion strain. Despite the many mutations, these mutants were stably expressed (Fig. 2A). The Atg1346D mutant showed a complete defect in bulk autophagy activity, as expected, but also the Atg1344D mutant was fully defective, suggesting that further phosphorylation sites in addition to Ser428 and Ser429 play important roles in autophagy regulation (Fig. 2B).
The mutation of 46 in vivo phosphorylation sites on Atg13 enables mimicking reciprocal states of autophagy activity
If phosphorylation of Atg13 inhibits bulk autophagy, then dephosphorylation should promote the pathway. To test this possibility, we generated the reciprocal non-phosphorylatable mutant Atg1344A (44 alanine and 2 aspartate mutations). This mutant showed enhanced bulk autophagy flux compared to Atg13wt-expressing cells, suggesting that cells carrying Atg1344A undergo a hyperactive autophagic state (Fig. 2B). We also generated the reciprocal mutant Atg1346A, which includes the S428 and S429 alanine mutations (46 alanine and 2 aspartate mutations). Co-immunoprecipitation of Atg17 with Atg1-protA demonstrated that the interaction between them relied entirely on the presence of Atg13 (Fig. 2C). While Atg1344A coprecipitated with Atg1-protA similar to Atg13 wild-type, co-precipitation of Atg1346A was reduced. The Atg1346A mutant contains the S428A and S429A mutations, two sites that have previously been reported to be required for binding to Atg17 (Fujioka et al, 2014), therefore it appears likely that the reduced co-precipitation of Atg1346A with Atg1 is due to less stable PAS formation of Atg1346A. These findings show that the 46 in vivo mapped phosphorylation sites mutated in Atg1344A and Atg1344D (44A: 44 sites mutated to A and 2 sites to D; 44D: 44 sites mutated to D and 2 sites to A) can mimic the autophagy-active and autophagy-inhibited states, respectively.
It has been reported previously that a mutant allele of Atg13 (Atg138SA), with eight non-phosphorylatable residues, exhibited hyperactivity in bulk autophagy. Four of the eight mutated residues had been mapped in vivo (Ser437, Ser438, Ser646, and Ser649), whereas the other four had been assigned by sequence similarities without in vivo verification (Ser348, Ser496, Ser535, and Ser541, (Kamada et al, 2010). All eight sites were also identified in our in vivo phospho-mapping analysis, but one site, Ser496, was phosphorylated instead of dephosphorylated upon starvation and therefore mutated in a reverse manner in the Atg1344A and Atg1344D mutants (Fig. 1B). Despite this difference, we compared the previously reported non-phosphorylatable Atg138SA and the reciprocal phospho-mimetic Atg138SD mutants to our Atg1344A and Atg1344D mutants, all expressed at endogenous levels. While the Atg138SA mutant showed a similar increase in the autophagy flux compared to Atg1344A, the Atg138SD mutant remained proficient in autophagy and was unable to mimic the reciprocal, inhibited state (Fig. 2D,E) We also created a mutant of these 8 sites, in which Ser496 was mutated reciprocally (7SD1A), as in the Atg1344D mutant. However, also this mutant was unable to mimic the inhibited state (Fig. 2F), suggesting that these eight sites are not sufficient to regulate Atg13 activity.
Together, these findings suggest that multiple phosphorylation events on Atg13, beyond phosphorylation of Ser428 and Ser429, regulate bulk autophagy activity. Remarkably, the full non-phosphorylatable allele was capable of inducing a hyperactive autophagy state, while the reciprocal, phospho-mimetic allele completely inhibited bulk autophagy.
Early PAS formation requires Atg13 dephosphorylation
Next, we asked if PAS formation is affected by our Atg13 phosphorylation mutants. We expressed GFP-tagged Atg13wt, Atg1344A or Atg1344D in atg8∆ atg13∆ atg19∆ cells. To monitor only bulk autophagy, we used cells not expressing the cytoplasm-to-vacuole transport (Cvt) pathway cargo-receptor Atg19, which lack Cvt pathway-induced PAS formation (Shintani et al, 2002; Scott et al, 2001). Furthermore, we used an atg8∆ background, which results in cells being unable to form autophagic membranes, thereby stalling PAS progression and preventing its turnover. This experimental setup allows the specific analysis of early PAS formation during bulk autophagy in a comparable manner between different mutants (Hollenstein et al, 2019). We observed that cells expressing Atg1344A formed more PAS structures than Atg13wt cells, but the Atg1344D mutant was completely defective in PAS formation, suggesting that extensive dephosphorylation of Atg13 is required to induce the assembly of the early PAS upon starvation (Fig. 2G).
Atg1344A induces bulk autophagy under nutrient-rich conditions without affecting TORC1 signaling
When analyzing the autophagic activity, we detected some autophagy flux also under nutrient-rich conditions in the Atg1344A mutant, but not the Atg13wt cells (Fig. 2B). This slight induction was significant (p = 0.03), but only visible when cells were grown in synthetic SD medium but not in YPD medium (Fig. 2E). As cells more rapidly divide in YPD than in SD medium, and hardly any division occurs upon starvation (Fig. 3A), we speculated that the vacuolar Pho8∆60 signal might be out-diluted by the more frequent cell divisions when cells are grown in YPD, thereby masking the basal bulk autophagy activity of the Atg1344A mutants. If Atg1344A cells induce bulk autophagy under nutrient-rich conditions, then inhibiting cell division should increase the measurable Pho8∆60 levels. To test this possibility, we inhibited cell division by treatment with hydroxyurea (HU). HU is an inhibitor of the ribonucleotide reductase, which causes decreased levels of dNTPs and therefore decreased DNA replication, resulting in a cell cycle arrest in S-phase (Fig. 3A, Rosebrock, 2017). Importantly, the cell cycle arrest caused by HU treatment does not result in TORC1 inhibition, which we addressed by monitoring the phosphorylation status of the TORC1 substrate Sch9 (Fig. 3B, Urban et al, 2007). Upon four hours of HU treatment, we observed a strong increase in Pho8∆60 activity under nutrient-rich conditions in Atg1344A-containing cells, which further increased upon prolonged HU treatment (Fig. 3C). Importantly, HU treatment did not result in elevated Pho8∆60 activity under nutrient-rich conditions in Atg13wt cells, showing that the HU-induced cell cycle arrest by itself does not trigger bulk autophagy. In summary, these findings support that the non-phosphorylatable Atg1344A mutant is sufficient to trigger bulk autophagy also under nutrient-rich conditions when TORC1 is active.
To compare if bulk autophagosomes formed in Atg1344A mutants under nutrient-rich conditions are morphologically similar to those formed in Atg13wt cells upon starvation, we analyzed these cells by transmission electron microscopy. We visualized the autophagic bodies in the vacuolar lumen of vacuolar protease-deficient pep4∆ cells (Guimaraes et al, 2015). Autophagic bodies accumulated in the vacuole of Atg13wt pep4∆ cells upon starvation, but not under nutrient-rich conditions, as expected (Fig. 3D). In contrast, Atg1344A pep4∆ cells accumulated some autophagic bodies under nutrient-rich conditions. This number was further increased upon HU treatment, consistent with the increased Pho8∆60 activity we observed under these conditions. We observed no obvious differences in morphology between the autophagic bodies of Atg13wt and Atg1344A mutant cells, suggesting that Atg1344A mutants are capable to form bulk autophagosomes under nutrient-rich conditions, similar to the ones generated upon starvation in wild-type cells.
Bulk autophagosome formation under nutrient-rich conditions is facilitated by Atg11
Several autophagy factors, such as Atg1 and Atg13, are required for both selective and bulk autophagy pathways, whereas other factors, such as cargo receptors (e.g. Atg19, the selective autophagy receptor for the Cvt pathway), are required only for their corresponding selective type of autophagy pathway (Kamada et al, 2000). The scaffold proteins Atg11 and Atg17 were initially thought to function exclusively in different autophagy pathways, with Atg11 being required for the selective pathways and Atg17 for the non-selective bulk process upon nutrient starvation (Kamada et al, 2000). We, therefore, tested if bulk autophagy under nutrient-rich conditions in Atg1344A mutants depended on the same machinery as bulk autophagy induced under starvation in Atg13wt cells. Similar to bulk autophagy during starvation, Atg17 was found to be necessary under rich conditions in Atg1344A mutants, while Atg19 was dispensable (Fig. 4A,B, Kabeya et al, 2005; Cheong et al, 2005; Chang and Huang, 2007). Unexpectedly, and in contrast to the situation under nitrogen starvation, Atg1344A mutants required Atg11 for efficient bulk autophagy induction when nutrients were available. This is in line with recent reports that Atg11 can contribute to bulk autophagosome formation under certain conditions, such as glucose or phosphate starvation (Adachi et al, 2017; Yao et al, 2020; Yokota et al, 2017). Co-immunoprecipitation experiments furthermore revealed increased levels of Atg1344A and Atg11 bound to Atg1 under nutrient-rich conditions (Fig. 4C).
Together, these findings suggest that mimicking the dephosphorylated state of Atg13 is sufficient to bypass TORC1 signaling and induce bulk autophagy under nutrient-rich conditions, which requires Atg17 and is facilitated by Atg11.
Constitutive high bulk autophagy activity is detrimental to survival during nitrogen starvation
As the Atg1344A mutant showed increased autophagy activity also under starvation, we asked if this enhanced autophagy flux affected cell survival. Indeed, dilution spotting on nutrient-rich YPD plates after 14 days of starvation resulted in a major defect of the Atg1344A mutant but not Atg13wt cells to survive and resume growth (Fig. 4D). When monitoring the autophagy flux during the first 24 h, autophagy stagnated around eight to twelve hours in Atg13wt cells but continued to increase in Atg1344A mutants (Fig. 4E). Such a decrease in autophagy activity upon prolonged starvation in wild-type cells is in agreement with previous studies and has been proposed to be mediated by Atg1-dependent re-phosphorylation of Atg13 (Kira et al, 2021). As the Atg1344A mutant showed increasing autophagy flux after 12 h, it appears that this mutant cannot be turned off efficiently and remains constitutively active, ultimately resulting in cell death. These findings support the notion that during starvation too little autophagy but also too much autophagy is detrimental for cell survival, underlining the need for fine-tuned and balanced autophagy regulation.
Atg13’s C-terminal phosphorylations impact Atg1 interaction in trans and control PAS formation
Previous studies have either addressed Atg13 phosphorylation in the LR and BR region that regulate Atg17 binding (Ser379 and Ser428/Ser429, Yamamoto et al, 2016; Fujioka et al, 2014) or phosphorylations in the MIM domain, which regulate Atg1 interaction (Ser484, Ser494, Ser496, Ser515, Ser517, Fujioka et al, 2014). All of these phosphorylations are located in the middle region of Atg13 (Fig. 1A). The Atg1344D mutant also displayed a severely reduced Atg1 and Atg17 binding (Fig. 2C), however, the mutated residues of Atg1344D are not only located in the middle region but are distributed over a large part of Atg13 (Fig. 1A). To address if phosphorylations outside the middle region affect the bulk autophagy flux, we split the mutated residues of Atg1344A and Atg1344D into N-terminal, middle, and C-terminal sites, and generated non-phosphorylatable and phosphomimetic mutants of the individual regions (Fig. 5A). In all these mutants, Ser428 and Ser429 were not mutated, as any mutation of those sites strongly affects Atg17 interaction (Fig. 1C, Fujioka et al, 2014). Non-phosphorylatable mutations in the middle region (Atg13MA) supported bulk autophagy to slightly higher levels than wild-type Atg13 (p value 0.00443, Fig. 5B), whereas the phospho-mimetic Atg13MD mutant was largely, but not completely defective (p value 0.00002, Fig. 5B). This is in contrast to Atg1344A and Atg1344D, which showed a hyperactive and completely defective autophagy state (Fig. 2B), suggesting that Atg13 phosphorylation outside of the middle region contributes to the regulation of bulk autophagy. Next, we tested non-phosphorylatable and phospho-mimetic mutants of the N-terminal (Atg13NA, Atg13ND) and the C-terminal regions (Atg13CA, Atg13CD). Whereas N-terminal mutations did neither promote nor inhibit autophagy, the Atg13CA mutant showed a slightly enhanced autophagy flux (p value 0.05424) and the Atg13CD mutant was 50% defective (Fig. 5B). As observed for the Atg1344D, also the Atg13MD mutant showed reduced Atg17 binding, suggesting that besides S428 and S429, additional phosphorylation sites in the middle region regulate the Atg13-Atg17 interaction. In contrast, the Atg13CD mutant co-purified similar amounts of Atg17 as the Atg13wt (Fig. 5C). However, all three aspartate mutants showed decreased binding of Atg1 and Atg13 (Fig. 5D). This result suggests that the partial autophagy defect observed in the Atg13CD mutant stems from a defect in Atg1 binding but not one in the Atg17 interaction. As the mutated residues in Atg13CD are outside of the Atg1-interaction region, C-terminal phosphorylation of Atg13 appears to affect Atg1 binding in trans.
If the autophagy defect observed in the Atg13CD mutant only is due to a failure in Atg1 binding, then artificial attachment of Atg1 to Atg13CD should rescue the defect. To investigate this possibility, we first tested if an Atg1-Atg13wt fusion protein is functional and can rescue the autophagy defect of atg1∆ atg13∆ mutant cells. Indeed, the stable fusion of Atg1 with Atg13wt fully restored autophagy in atg1∆ atg13∆ cells, similar to the rescue of atg1∆ cells by Atg1 expression (Fig. 5E). Next, we tested whether the bulk autophagy defect of the previously described Atg13FV mutant (F468A V469A), which is unable to bind Atg1, can be restored by fusing it to Atg1 (Kraft et al, 2012). Indeed, the Atg1-Atg13FV fusion protein fully restored bulk autophagy flux in atg1∆ atg13∆ cells, confirming that the fusion of Atg1 and Atg13 is functional and can bypass the natural interaction of Atg1 with Atg13 (Fig. 5E). Similarly, fusing the Atg13CD mutant to Atg1 was able to restore its bulk autophagy activity, supporting that the Atg13CD mutant defect stems from its inability to bind to Atg1 (Fig. 5F).
Previous studies have reported that the initiation of PAS formation is primarily dependent on Atg13 and Atg17, whereas Atg1 kinase activity is required for membrane expansion (Fujioka et al, 2020; Cheong et al, 2008). Therefore, it was anticipated that the Atg13CD mutant would hinder autophagy progression rather than impede PAS formation. However, examination of early PAS puncta formation of Atg13CD-GFP expressing cells by fluorescent microscopy revealed a significant defect. Remarkably, this defect was rescued by expressing the Atg1-Atg13CD-GFP fusion protein (Fig. 5G).
These findings reveal that, in addition to the Atg13-Atg17 interaction, the association of Atg1 and Atg13 plays an essential role in the initial step of PAS formation, highlighting the importance of Atg1 for bulk autophagy initiation.
Atg11 contributes to PAS formation and bulk autophagy function
The Atg13MD and Atg1344D mutants showed a strong reduction in the autophagy flux to about 20% and 10% of wild-type levels, respectively. As both these mutants showed reduced Atg1 binding, we tested if their fusion to Atg1 partially rescued this defect. Indeed, the bulk autophagy activity of these mutants was increased to 45% and 35% when stably fused to Atg1 (Fig. 6A). The amount of restored autophagy activity was surprising, given that Atg1344D and Atg13MD showed hardly any Atg17 binding (Fig. 5C). Therefore, we hypothesized that Atg11 might support bulk autophagy under these conditions, similar to what we observed for Atg1344A-induced bulk autophagy under nutrient-rich conditions. To test this possibility, we measured the autophagy flux of the Atg1-Atg13MD and Atg1-Atg1344D fusion mutants in the absence of Atg11. Indeed, upon deletion of Atg11, we observed a complete autophagy defect for both mutants (Fig. 6B). It should be noted that a reduction in bulk autophagy of about 30% was also observed for the Atg1-Atg13wt fusion in the atg11∆ background. As expected, these mutants also showed an Ape1 processing defect in the absence of Atg11 or Atg19 (Fig. 6C). These findings substantiate an active involvement of Atg11 in bulk autophagy and suggest that a synthetic defect arises from the impaired Atg13-Atg17 interaction combined with the loss of Atg11.
To test if Atg11 is indeed involved in a similar process as the Atg13-Atg17 interaction, we used fluorescence microscopy to assess the impact of Atg11 on the initial formation of the PAS. While some PAS puncta were formed by Atg1-Atg13MD-GFP and Atg1-Atg1344D-GFP in the presence of Atg11, almost no puncta were observed in atg11∆ cells (Fig. 6D). These findings suggest that Atg11 operates in an analogous manner to the Atg13-Atg17 interaction.
The Atg11-dependent bulk PAS possesses similar characteristics as the wild-type PAS
The formation of the early bulk autophagy PAS has been reported to involve the creation of a liquid-like condensate, facilitated by multivalent interaction between Atg13 and Atg17 (Fujioka et al, 2020). Given the requirement of Atg11 for the formation of the early bulk autophagy PAS in the Atg1-Atg1344D and Atg1-Atg13MD fusion mutants, we investigated whether this PAS structure exhibits comparable liquid-like characteristics to those observed in wild-type conditions. To assess this, we utilized 1,6-hexanediol, a widely employed chemical for disrupting liquid–liquid phase separated assemblies, which has also been shown to affect the bulk autophagy PAS in yeast cells (Fujioka et al, 2020). As expected, 1,6-hexanediol effectively dissolved wild-type PAS puncta, which were monitored by expressing Atg13-GFP in atg13∆ atg19∆ cells. Similarly, GFP puncta formed in Atg1-Atg13MD-GFP and Atg1-Atg1344D-GFP containing atg1∆ atg13∆ atg19∆ cells vanished upon 1,6-hexanediol treatment, indicating that the Atg11-dependent bulk autophagy PAS also forms through liquid–liquid phase separation and that Atg11 somehow contributes to this process (Fig. 6E).
This study demonstrates that the phosphorylation of numerous serine and threonine residues on Atg13 can modulate its interaction with Atg1 and Atg17 and that both of these interactions are crucial for the initiation of bulk PAS formation. Furthermore, our findings uncover an intricate molecular assembly process of the PAS, involving not only the multivalent interaction between Atg13 and Atg17 but also the participation of Atg1 and Atg11 (Fig. 7).
Discussion
In this study, we took a comprehensive approach to investigate the function of the numerous phosphorylation events that occur on Atg13 during nutrient-rich conditions or nitrogen starvation. Our findings demonstrate that the post-translational regulation of Atg13 by numerous phosphorylation events is a crucial mechanism for precisely regulating bulk autophagy activity.
Different studies have reported many in vivo phosphorylation sites on Atg13, but only a few of these sites have been functionally characterized. We mapped 48 in vivo phosphorylation sites, several of them overlapping with previous studies. To test whether mutation of such a large number of phosphorylation sites is not simply disrupting the function of Atg13, we generated two reciprocal alleles by mutating the same set of phospho-accepting residues to either alanine or aspartate. Atg1344A mimics the dephosphorylated, active state, and Atg1344D mimics the phosphorylated, inactive state. Despite the large number of mutated residues, both mutants were stably expressed. Indeed, the Atg1344D mutant was fully defective in bulk autophagy, whereas Atg1344A was not only fully functional but displayed strong hyperactivity. Atg1344A was even able to induce bulk autophagy under nutrient-rich conditions when TORC1 is active. To our knowledge, this is the first pair of reciprocal mutants that can mimic the fully active and the fully inhibited state of Atg13. Importantly, after long-term starvation, the hyperactive Atg1344A mutant showed decreased survival, a phenotype that had so far exclusively been observed for autophagy-defective mutants. These findings demonstrate that disrupting the dynamic regulation of Atg13 can lead to insufficient or overshooting autophagy, both of which are detrimental to cell survival.
Phosphorylations occurring in different regions of Atg13 play a crucial role in regulating its interactions with Atg1 and Atg17 through different mechanisms. The central region of Atg13 contains the Atg1 and Atg17 binding domains. We identified previously uncharacterized phosphorylation sites within these domains that regulate the interaction of Atg13 with Atg1 and Atg17. Moreover, phosphorylation in the C-terminal region of Atg13, which is not required for Atg1 binding per se, negatively affects the interaction with Atg1 in trans. These additional levels of regulation may contribute to the intricate mechanism that controls the activity of the bulk autophagy process and facilitates the integration of various cellular signals on Atg13. Whether all of the mutated residues in the middle and C-terminal region of Atg13 contribute to the regulation of bulk autophagy or if this function is governed only by a subset of the sites needs further investigation. Given that an Atg1-Atg13 fusion protein seems completely operational in bulk autophagy upon nitrogen starvation, the question arises if a phospho-regulated detachment of the Atg1-Atg13 complex, post PAS formation, happens at all or if such a detachment has any functional consequences during autophagosome generation.
Initially, Atg11 was thought to play a role only in selective autophagy pathways, but more recent work has demonstrated its involvement in bulk autophagy as well. This involvement has primarily been observed in conditions of bulk autophagy triggered by means other than nitrogen starvation, such as carbon or phosphate starvation, (Adachi et al, 2017; Yao et al, 2020; Yokota et al, 2017). Nonetheless, a possible involvement of Atg11 in nitrogen-starvation-induced bulk autophagy has been occasionally observed (Liu et al, 2016; Mao et al, 2013). Notably, fission yeast appears to not only rely on Atg17 but also on Atg11 for its bulk autophagy function (Pan et al, 2020). In line with a role of Atg11 also in bulk autophagy of S. cerevisiae, we observed that the previously reported Atg17-binding mutant Atg13S379D (Yamamoto et al, 2016) only marginally affected bulk autophagy under nitrogen starvation in the presence of Atg11, however, showed an enhanced defect in atg11∆ mutants (Fig. 1D). Moreover, the bulk autophagy activity induced by Atg1344A under nutrient-rich conditions was severely reduced in the absence of Atg11 (Fig. 4A). Similarly, both the Atg1-Atg13MD and Atg1-Atg1344D fusion proteins, which almost completely lacked Atg17 binding (Fig. 5B), still showed up to 45% bulk autophagy flux upon starvation but were completely defective in the absence of Atg11 (Fig. 6A,B). This unexpected synthetic defect in bulk autophagy, caused by the deletion of Atg11 in combination with a weakened Atg13-Atg17 interaction, resulted in a complete failure in PAS formation (Fig. 6D), strongly supporting a direct involvement of Atg11 in early PAS generation also in bulk autophagy. All these observations hint at an involvement of Atg11 in bulk autophagy, also during nitrogen starvation. Different starvation conditions have been reported to induce varying levels of activity in bulk autophagy (Yokota et al, 2017; Rangarajan et al, 2020). This variability in activity may be attributed to variations in the extent of Atg13 dephosphorylation, which in turn affects its affinity for Atg1 and Atg17. Our results suggest that when the affinity of Atg13 for Atg17 is only partially increased, the importance of Atg11 in PAS assembly becomes more pronounced, which might explain the observed dependency on Atg11 under certain starvation conditions. Comparing the phosphorylation status of Atg13 across different starvation conditions would provide valuable insights into whether the degree of dephosphorylation correlates with the level of bulk autophagy flux.
Phase separation has been reported to play a critical role in autophagy by organizing the autophagy machinery at the PAS (Fujioka et al, 2020). It was suggested that the interaction between Atg13 and Atg17 drives the phase transition of the PAS and that the phosphorylation status of Atg13 functions as a regulator for this process. Phase separation is typically driven by multivalent interactions of relatively low strength. Previous studies have established a direct interaction of Atg11 with Atg1 and Atg29, and that Atg11 exists as a dimeric protein (Mao et al, 2013; Suzuki and Noda, 2018). Based on our findings, it is plausible to propose that the weak interactions between Atg1, Atg11, and Atg29 contribute to the pool of multivalent interactions among the early PAS proteins that drive the phase transition of the PAS. This model raises intriguing questions about the mechanisms of autophagy induction in other organisms that possess a different set of autophagy-related proteins. It is possible that the phase separation of the PAS may involve varying sets of proteins, while they have in common to rely on a pool of multivalent interactions. This flexibility in utilizing different sets of proteins would allow autophagy initiation to be controlled by various signaling pathways that regulate the interaction capabilities of core and auxiliary autophagy proteins. Additional research is required to unravel the contribution of different early PAS factors in S. cerevisiae to phase separation at a molecular level, as well as how this process is achieved in other organisms with distinct autophagy factors.
Methods
Yeast strains and plasmids
Yeast strains are listed in Table 1. Plasmids are listed in Tables 2, 3. Yeast genomic mutations were integrated by homologous recombination, and multiple deletions or mutations were generated by PCR knockout, mating, and dissection.
Table 1.
Name | Genotype | Background | Source |
---|---|---|---|
BY4741 | his3∆1 leu2∆0 met15∆0 ura3∆0; Mat a | BY474x | Euroscarf |
yABH1 | pho8::pho8∆60:His ATG13wt:Ura; Mat alpha | BY474x | This study |
yABH2 | pho8::pho8∆60:His ATG13CD:Ura; Mat alpha | BY474x | This study |
yABH3 | pho8::pho8∆60:His ATG1344D:Ura; Mat alpha | BY474x | This study |
yABH6 | pho8::pho8∆60:His ATG13NA:Ura; Mat alpha | BY474x | This study |
yABH7 | pho8::pho8∆60:His ATG13ND:Ura; Mat alpha | BY474x | This study |
yABH8 | pho8::pho8∆60:His ATG13CA:Ura; Mat alpha | BY474x | This study |
yABH11 | ATG13wt:Ura; Mat a | BY474x | This study |
yABH17 | pho8::pho8∆60:His ATG1344A:Ura; Mat alpha | BY474x | This study |
yABH25 | ATG1344D:Ura; Mat a | BY474x | This study |
yABH26 | ATG1344A:Ura; Mat a | BY474x | This study |
yABH59 | pho8::pho8∆60:His ATG138SA:Ura; Mat alpha | BY474x | This study |
yABH60 | pho8::pho8∆60:His ATG138SD:Ura; Mat alpha | BY474x | This study |
yABH62 | pho8::pho8∆60:His ATG13MA:Ura; Mat alpha | BY474x | This study |
yABH63 | pho8::pho8∆60:His ATG13MD:Ura; Mat alpha | BY474x | This study |
yABH73 | pho8::pho8∆60:His atg1::Kan atg11::Hyg atg13::Kan; Mat a | BY474x | This study |
yABH76 | pho8::pho8∆60:His ATG13379D:Ura; Mat alpha | BY474x | This study |
yABH78 | pho8::pho8∆60:His ATG13428D429D:Ura; Mat alpha | BY474x | This study |
yABH79 | pho8::pho8∆60:His ATG13429D:Ura; Mat alpha | BY474x | This study |
yABH80 | pho8::pho8∆60:His ATG13428A429A:Ura; Mat alpha | BY474x | This study |
yABH81 | pho8::pho8∆60:His atg11::Nat ATG13379D:Ura; Mat a | BY474x | This study |
yABH86 | pho8::pho8∆60:His atg11::Nat ATG13wt:Ura; Mat a | BY474x | This study |
yABH90 | atg8::His atg13::Kan atg19::Hyg; Mat a | BY474x | This study |
yABH91 | atg8::Kan atg13::Nat atg17::His atg19::Kan; Mat a | BY474x | This study |
yCK416 | atg11:Kan; Mat a | BY474x | (Pfaffenwimmer et al, 2014) |
yCK418 | atg13::Kan; Mat a | BY474x | This study |
yDH11 | pho8::pho8∆60:His; Mat alpha | BY474x | This study |
yDH516 | pho8::pho8∆60:His atg13::Kan atg1::Kan; Mat alpha | BY474x | This study |
yDP441 | atg1::Kan atg13::Nat atg19::Kan; Mat a | BY474x | This study |
yDP445 | atg13::Nat atg19::Kan; Mat a | BY474x | This study |
yDP451 | atg19::Hyg; Mat a | BY474x | This study |
yDP454 | atg1::Kan atg11::Hyg atg13::Nat atg19::Kan; Mat a | BY474x | This study |
yRT15 | Atg1-stag(protA-speptide):His atg13::Nat atg17-13myc:Kan Vac8-HA:Kan; Mat a | BY474x | This study |
yRT70 | atg1::Kan atg11::Hyg atg13::Kan; Mat alpha | BY474x | (Torggler et al, 2016) |
yRT105 | atg1::His atg13::Nat; Mat alpha | BY474x | This study |
yRT199 | pho8::pho8∆60:His atg1::Kan; Mat a | BY474x | This study |
yRT238 | atg13::Kan pep4∆::Nat; Mat a | BY474x | This study |
ySS15 | pho8::pho8∆60:His atg13::Kan; Mat alpha | BY474x | This study |
ySS22 | pho8::pho8∆60:His atg13::Kan atg11::Nat; Mat a | BY474x | This study |
ySS24 | pho8::pho8∆60:His atg13::Kan atg17::His; Mat a | BY474x | This study |
ySS31 | pho8::pho8∆60:His atg13::Kan atg19::Kan; Mat alpha | BY474x | This study |
yTP210 | Atg1-stag(protA-speptide):His atg13::Nat; Mat alpha | BY474x | (Torggler et al, 2016) |
Description: Atg13 constructs were genomically integrated by homologous recombination into the atg13::Kan locus in the following BY474x strains:
pho8::pho8∆60:His atg13::Kan (ySS15) or atg13::Kan (yCK418).
Table 2.
Name | Characteristics | Promoter | Terminator | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|
pRS315 | CEN, LEU2 | – | – | (Sikorski and Hieter, 1989) |
pRS316 | CEN, URA3 | – | – | (Sikorski and Hieter, 1989) |
pABH15 | Atg1-13CD; pRS415 | Atg1 | CYC1 | This study |
pABH41 | Atg138SD; pRS316 | Atg13 | Atg13 | This study |
pABH45 | Atg1-13MD; pRS415 | Atg1 | CYC1 | This study |
pABH46 | Atg1-1344D; pRS415 | Atg1 | CYC1 | This study |
pABH48 | Atg1344A-GFP; pRS415 | Atg13 | CYC1 | This study |
pABH49 | Atg1344D-GFP; pRS415 | Atg13 | CYC1 | This study |
pABH53 | Atg13MD-GFP; pRS415 | Atg13 | CYC1 | This study |
pABH55 | Atg13CD-GFP; pRS415 | Atg13 | CYC1 | This study |
pABH65 | Atg1-13CD-GFP; pRS415 | Atg1 | CYC1 | This study |
pABH66 | Atg1-13wt-GFP; pRS415 | Atg1 | CYC1 | This study |
pABH71 | Atg137SD1A; pRS316 | Atg13 | Atg13 | This study |
pCK111 | Atg1; pRS315 | Atg1 | Atg1 | (Kijanska et al, 2010) |
pCK582 | Atg13wt-GFP; pRS415 | Atg13 | CYC1 | (Torggler et al, 2016) |
pCK789 | Atg13; pRS316 | Atg13 | Atg13 | This study |
pDP227 | Atg1-GFP; pRS415 | Atg1 | CYC1 | This study |
pMS98 | Atg1-13FV; pRS415 | Atg1 | CYC1 | This study |
pRT09 | Atg1346A; pRS316 | Atg13 | Atg13 | This study |
pRT10 | Atg1346D; pRS316 | Atg13 | Atg13 | This study |
pRT15 | Atg1344A; pRS316 | Atg13 | Atg13 | This study |
pRT16 | Atg1344D; pRS316 | Atg13 | Atg13 | This study |
pRT67 | Atg1-13wt; pRS415 | Atg1 | CYC1 | This study |
Table 3.
Name | Characteristics | Promoter | Terminator | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|
pABH03 | Atg13wt, pRS406 | Atg13 | Atg13 | This study |
pABH04 | Atg13CD, pRS406 | Atg13 | Atg13 | This study |
pABH05 | Atg1344D, pRS406 | Atg13 | Atg13 | This study |
pABH08 | Atg13NA, pRS406 | Atg13 | Atg13 | This study |
pABH09 | Atg13ND, pRS406 | Atg13 | Atg13 | This study |
pABH10 | Atg13CA, pRS406 | Atg13 | Atg13 | This study |
pABH13 | Atg1344A, pRS406 | Atg13 | Atg13 | This study |
pABH34 | Atg13MA, pRS406 | Atg13 | Atg13 | This study |
pABH35 | Atg13MD, pRS406 | Atg13 | Atg13 | This study |
pABH42 | Atg138SA, pRS406 | Atg13 | Atg13 | This study |
pABH43 | Atg138SD, pRS406 | Atg13 | Atg13 | This study |
pABH57 | Atg13379D, pRS406 | Atg13 | Atg13 | This study |
pABH58 | Atg13429D, pRS406 | Atg13 | Atg13 | This study |
pABH60 | Atg13428D429D, pRS406 | Atg13 | Atg13 | This study |
pABH61 | Atg13428A429A, pRS406 | Atg13 | Atg13 | This study |
Growth condition
Yeast grown in a synthetic medium (SD: 0.17% yeast nitrogen base, 0.5% ammonium sulfate, 2% glucose, and amino acids) or YPD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, and 2% glucose). For starvation, cells were washed with and resuspended in a nitrogen starvation medium (SD-N: 0.17% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids, 2% glucose) for the indicated time to induce bulk autophagy. Yeast cultures were incubated at 30 °C with shaking at 220 rpm. For hydroxyurea (HU) treatment, yeast cultures were grown overnight in YPD or SD medium in logarithmic (log) phase and diluted to an OD600 of 0.3. 2 M HU stock solution was freshly prepared in YPD or synthetic medium and added to a final concentration of 200 mM. Cells were further incubated for 4–8 h.
Antibodies
Antisera were diluted in 1x PBS pH 7.4 containing 5% milk powder: Mouse monoclonal anti-GFP (1:100, clone 2B6, Merck, cat # MABC1689), rabbit polyclonal PAP antibody (1:3000, Sigma-Aldrich, cat # P1291), mouse monoclonal anti-Pgk1 antibody (1:10,000, clone 22C5D8, Invitrogen, cat # 459250), rabbit polyclonal anti-Atg1 antibody (1:15,000, Daniel Klionsky, University of Michigan, USA), rabbit polyclonal anti-Atg13 antibody (1:15,000, Daniel Klionsky, University of Michigan, USA), mouse monoclonal anti-Atg11 antibody (1:500, clone 6F4-G4, Claudine Kraft, University of Freiburg, Germany), mouse monoclonal anti-Atg17 antibody (1:50, clone 4D3-E8, Claudine Kraft, University of Freiburg, Germany), mouse monoclonal anti-Myc antibody (used 1:5000) (4A6, Millipore). Rabbit polyclonal anti-pT737- Sch9 (used 1:500, Robbie Loewith, University of Geneva, Switzerland) was diluted in 1× PBS pH 7.4 containing 5% BSA.
Pho8∆60 assay
15-20 OD600 units of yeast culture were harvested by centrifugation (2000 × g, 5 min, room temperature). Pellets were washed in 1 ml distilled water, followed by centrifugation (2000 × g, 5 min, 4 °C). Pellets were resuspended in 2 ml ice-cold 0.85% NaCl containing 1 mM PMSF, centrifuged (2000 × g, 5 min, 4 °C), and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Pellets were resuspended in 16 µl/OD600 unit lysis buffer (20 mM PIPES pH 6.8, 0.5% Triton X-100, 50 mM NaCl, 100 mM potassium acetate, 10 mM MgSO4, 10 μM ZnSO4, 1 mM PMSF, cOmpleteTM protease inhibitor cocktail (EDTA-free, Roche)). Cells were lysed by bead beating for 5 min at 4 °C and cell extracts were cleared by centrifugation (16,000 × g, 5 min, 4 °C). The supernatant was diluted with lysis buffer to a protein concentration of 50 µg/100 µl. 400 µl reaction buffer (0.4% Triton X-100, 10 mM MgSO4, 10 μM ZnSO4, and 250 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.5) containing 6.25 mM alpha-naphthyl phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the enzymatic reactions and to the control reaction, which only contained lysis buffer. Reactions were incubated at 37 °C for 10 min and stopped by adding 500 µl stop buffer (1 M glycine pH 11). Fluorescence was measured using 345 nm for excitation and 472 nm for emission. For each experiment, at least three independent replicates were performed. To calculate Normalized Pho8∆60 activity, for each batch of samples a standard curve was generated using a dilution series of 1-naphthol (Sigma-Aldrich). A second-degree polynomial curve was fitted to the standard curve, which was then used for the calculation of relative activity values for each sample. If any data points exceeded the highest value of the standard curve, a linear interpolation was applied using the slope from the highest point of the polynomial curve. To ensure comparability between different batches, a normalization procedure was implemented. Firstly, samples that were measured in all batches were selected. A normalization factor was calculated as the average relative activity of these samples. Within each batch, the relative activity of all samples was divided by the respective normalization factor. Finally, the relative activity of all samples was divided by the mean relative activity of the reference condition, as indicated in the figure legends, thereby setting the Pho8∆60 activity of the reference condition to 1. Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed unpaired t-tests.
Serial dilution spot assay
Yeast cell cultures were grown to mid-log phase in YPD medium, shifted to SD-N medium containing 10 µg/ml tetracycline, diluted to an OD600 of 0.2, and directly spotted or incubated at 30 °C for 14 days prior to spotting. For analyzing cell viability, a 7-fold serial dilution series was prepared by diluting cell cultures in SD-N medium. 4 µl of each dilution was spotted onto YPD plates and incubated at 30 °C. Pictures were taken after 32 h of incubation at 30 °C.
Yeast extract preparation
For preparing trichloroacetic acid (TCA) extracts, 1.5 ml of yeast cell culture was precipitated with 7% TCA and incubated for 10–20 min on ice. Precipitated proteins were pelleted at 16,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C, washed with 1 ml acetone, pelleted at 16,000 × g for 8 min at 4 °C, air-dried, resuspended in urea loading buffer (120 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 5% glycerol, 8 M urea, 143 mM beta-mercaptoethanol, 8% SDS), and boiled before SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis. For the preparation of freezer-milled yeast powder, cells were harvested by centrifugation (3000 × g, 10 min, room temperature), washed with 1× PBS containing 2% glucose, and resuspended in 1 µl/OD600 unit IP buffer (1× PBS, 10% glycerol, 0.5% Tween-20, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM PMSF, 20 mM β-glycerophosphate, 1 mM Na3VO4 and cOmpleteTM protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche)). Cells were milled in a cryogenic grinder (SPEX Freezer Mill 6875, SPEX SamplePrep), using five rounds of 3 min breakage at 15 cycles per second and 2 min cooling. Yeast powder was stored at −80 °C.
Pulldown assays
0.75 g of freezer-milled yeast powder was thawed on ice and 468 µl of IP buffer was added. The extract was cleared by centrifugation (twice for 10 min, 5000 × g, 4 °C). Protein concentration was adjusted to 20 µg/µl in 600–700 µl IP buffer. For protein A pulldowns, the extract was incubated with 5 µl of DynabeadsTM M-270 Epoxy (Invitrogen), which were coupled with IgG from rabbit serum (Sigma). For GFP pulldowns, 5 µl of GFP-Trap® DynabeadsTM (Chromo Tek) were used. Beads with extract were rotated for 1 h at 4 °C. Beads were washed three times for 5 min in IP buffer and finally eluted in 10 µl of urea loading buffer.
Electron microscopy
15 OD600 units of cells were harvested by centrifugation (1800 × g, 5 min, room temperature). Cells were washed in distilled water and pelleted by centrifugation (1800 × g, 5 min, room temperature). Cells were resuspended in 3 ml of freshly prepared ice-cold 1.5% KMnO4 (Sigma) and transferred into two 1.5 ml microfuge tubes. After topping up the tube with the same solution to exclude air, samples were mixed for 30 min rotating at 4 °C. After centrifugation (1400 × g, 3 min, 4 °C), the 1.5% KMnO4 incubation was repeated once more before washing the pellets five times with 1 ml of distilled water. Permanganate-fixed cells were dehydrated stepwise with increasing concentrations of acetone (10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, 90%, 95%, and three times 100%-dried acetone). Each incubation step was performed for 20 min at at room temperature on a slow motion (4 rpm) rotatory wheel, and in between each step cells were pelleted by centrifugation (1400 × g, 3 min, room temperature). The 100% Spurr’s resin was freshly prepared by mixing 10 g of 4-vinylcyclohexene dioxide (or ERL4206) (Sigma), 4 g of epichlorohydrin-polyglycol epoxy (DER) resin 736 (Sigma), 26 g of (2-nonen-1-yl) succinic anhydride (NSA) (Sigma), and 0.4 g of N,N-diethylethanolamine (Ted-Pella). After dehydration, cell pellets were resuspended in 33% Spurr’s resin (5 ml of 100% Spurr’s resin mixed with 10 ml of acetone dried (MERCK-1.00299.0500)) and incubated on a rotating wheel for 1 h rotating at room temperature. Cells were pelleted (7600 × g, 3 min, room temperature) and incubated in 100% Spurr’s resin overnight rotating at room temperature. This procedure was repeated over the day, after centrifugation of the overnight incubation (9000 × g, 5 min, room temperature). Afterward, the cells resuspended in 100% Spurr’s resin were transferred to size 00 embedding capsules (Electron Microscopy Science) and were pelleted by centrifugation (9000 × g, 5 min, room temperature). Embedding capsules were topped up with 100% Spurr’s resin and baked for a minimum of 3 days at 60 °C. Thin sections of ~55 nm were cut using an UC-7 ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems). Cell sections were collected on formvar carbon-coated 50 meshes copper grids (EMS) and stained with a filtered lead-citrate solution (80 mM lead nitrate, 120 mM sodium citrate pH 12) for 2 min at room temperature. Sections were viewed in a CM100bio TEM (Thermo-Fischer, Eindhoven).
Quantitative live-cell imaging
Yeast cells were attached to either 35 mm glass bottom dishes (D35-20, 1.5, In Vitro Scientific) (Figs. 2G, 5G, and 6D) or to Ibidi slides (µ-Slide VI 0.4 ibiTreat) (Fig. 6E) pretreated with concanavalin A type IV (1 mg/ml). Imaging was performed at room temperature. For 1,6-hexanediol treatment, yeast cells were incubated in nitrogen starvation media supplemented with 10 µg/ml digitonin and 10% 1,6-hexanediol. Mock treatment was performed by adding 10 µg/ml digitonin (Kroschwald et al, 2017). Fluorescence microscopy images were recorded with a DeltaVision Ultra High-Resolution microscope (GE Healthcare, Applied Precision) equipped with an UPlanSApo 100x/1.4 oil objective (Olympus), a sCMOS pco.edge camera (PCO), and a seven-channel solid state light source (Lumencor). Raw microscopy images were deconvolved using the softWorX deconvolution plugin (version 7.2.1). Image analysis was performed using FIJI (Schindelin et al, 2012). Images from each figure panel were taken with the same imaging setup and are shown with the same contrast settings unless stated otherwise. All images were generated by collecting a z-stack of 21 pictures with focal planes 0.25 μm apart. Single focal planes of representative images are shown in Figs. 2G, 5G, and 6D. Collapsed Z-stack focal planes of representative images are shown in Fig. 6E. For quantification independent replicates were analyzed and manual counting was performed blindly after randomizing image names.
HB purification and mass spectrometry (MS) analysis
Stable isotope labeling using amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) (Ong et al, 2002) was achieved as described previously (Reiter et al, 2012). Histidin-biotin (HB) (Reiter et al, 2012) tandem affinity tag fusions of Atg13 were expressed in S.cerevisiae wild-type and atg1Δ cells. Cells were grown to mid-log phase and starved in SD-N or treated with rapamycin for 45 min, harvested by filtration, and deep-frozen in liquid N2. HB tandem affinity purifications, in-solution digestion with trypsin, and enrichment of phosphorylated peptides using TiO2 was performed as described previously (Reiter et al, 2012). Trypsinized peptides were analyzed on a reversed-phase nano-high-performance LC-MS system (Ultimate 3000 RSLC nano-flow chromatography system, Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled with an electrospray ionization interface (Proxeon Biosystems). Peptides were separated by applying an increasing organic solvent (acetonitrile) gradient from 2.5% to 40% in 0.1% formic acid (running time 80 min). The capillary temperature was set to 275 °C. MS analysis was performed using a Linear Trap Quadrupole Orbitrap Velos (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The mass spectrometer was operated in data-dependent mode, with a mass range of 350–2000 m/z with lock mass activated, at a resolution of 60’000 at 200 m/z and an automatic gain control (AGC) target value of 3E6. The 12 most intense ions were selected for fragmentation in the collision-induced dissociation mode.
Data analysis was performed using the SEQUEST algorithm (Proteome Discoverer 1.3) using the Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD, version February 2011) along with contaminants derived from the common laboratory contaminants database (MQ). Fixed modifications included carbamidomethylation of cysteine. Protein N-terminal acetylation, deamidation, oxidation of methionine, phosphorylation of serine, threonine and tyrosine, and heavy labels of arginine and lysine (Arg6, Lys6) were set as variable. Enzyme specificity was set to “Trypsin/P” and a maximum of 2 missed cleavages per peptide was allowed. For the assignment of phosphorylation sites, we integrated the tool phosphoRS into the Proteome Discoverer pipeline and considered 75% phosphorylation probability as an adequate threshold for phosphorylation site assignment. We performed the SEQUEST analysis against the SGD database, as well as a decoy database (reversed sequences), and calculated an empirical FDR < 1% at the level of peptide spectrum matches (PSMs). Separately, we calculated an FDR at peptide and protein level as well (FDR < 1%). The potential arginine-to-proline conversion was corrected by calculating a factor based on the SILAC ratio biases observed for peptide groups that are different in the number of prolines. SILAC Heavy-to-Light ratios were accordingly corrected and log2-transformed.
The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the PRIDE partner repository (Perez-Riverol et al, 2021) with the dataset identifier PXD028461.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank Siri-Jasmin Schultz and Belen Pacheco for performing initial Pho8∆60 experiments, Dan Klionsky for anti-Atg13 antibodies, and the Vienna Biocenter Core Facilities (VBCF) for providing the LC–MS instrument pool. The Kraft laboratory has received funding from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation); Project ID 409673687; SFB 1381 (Project ID 403222702); SFB 1177 (Project ID 259130777); under Germany’s Excellence Strategy (CIBSS - EXC-2189- Project ID 390939984); form the Vienna Science and Technology Fund (WWTF, VRG10-001); from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 769065; from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 765912. NR, WR, and GA were supported by the FWF Austrian Science Fund Special Research Program F34. This work was further supported by ENW KLEIN-1 (OCENW.KLEIN.118), ZonMW TOP (91217002) SNSF Sinergia (CRSII5_189952) and Novo Nordisk Foundation (0066384) grants to FR. This work reflects only the authors’ view and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. The authors declare no competing financial interests. The Kraft laboratory thanks the SGBM graduate school for supporting their students. Work included in this study has also been performed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the doctoral thesis of AB, ML, and AC at the University of Freiburg.
Author contributions
Anuradha Bhattacharya: Validation; Investigation; Visualization; Methodology; Writing—review and editing. Raffaela Torggler: Validation; Investigation; Visualization. Wolfgang Reiter: Supervision; Validation; Investigation; Visualization; Writing—review and editing. Natalie Romanov: Validation; Investigation. Mariya Licheva: Validation; Investigation; Visualization. Akif Ciftci: Validation; Investigation; Visualization. Muriel Mari: Validation; Investigation; Visualization. Lena Kolb: Validation; Investigation. Dominik Kaiser: Validation; Investigation. Fulvio Reggiori: Supervision; Funding acquisition; Validation; Writing—review and editing. Gustav Ammerer: Supervision; Funding acquisition; Validation. David M Hollenstein: Conceptualization; Supervision; Validation; Visualization; Methodology; Writing—original draft; Project administration; Writing—review and editing. Claudine Kraft: Conceptualization; Supervision; Funding acquisition; Validation; Visualization; Methodology; Writing—original draft; Project administration; Writing—review and editing.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Data availability
The datasets produced in this study are available in the following database: Phospho-proteomic MS data: PRIDE PXD028461.
Disclosure and competing interests statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Contributor Information
David M Hollenstein, Email: david.hollenstein@univie.ac.at.
Claudine Kraft, Email: kraft@biochemie.uni-freiburg.de.
Supplementary information
Expanded view data, supplementary information, appendices are available for this paper at 10.1038/s44319-023-00055-9.
References
- Adachi A, Koizumi M, Ohsumi Y. Autophagy induction under carbon starvation conditions is negatively regulated by carbon catabolite repression. J Biol Chem. 2017;292:19905–19918. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.817510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chang C-Y, Huang W-P. Atg19 mediates a dual interaction cargo sorting mechanism in selective autophagy. Mol Biol Cell. 2007;18:919–929. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e06-08-0683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheong H, Nair U, Geng J, Klionsky DJ. The Atg1 kinase complex is involved in the regulation of protein recruitment to initiate sequestering vesicle formation for nonspecific autophagy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19:668–681. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e07-08-0826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheong H, Yorimitsu T, Reggiori F, Legakis JE, Wang C-W, Klionsky DJ. Atg17 regulates the magnitude of the autophagic response. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:3438–3453. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e04-10-0894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fujioka Y, Alam JM, Noshiro D, Mouri K, Ando T, Okada Y, May AI, Knorr RL, Suzuki K, Ohsumi Y, et al. Phase separation organizes the site of autophagosome formation. Nature. 2020;578:301–305. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-1977-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fujioka Y, Suzuki SW, Yamamoto H, Kondo-Kakuta C, Kimura Y, Hirano H, Akada R, Inagaki F, Ohsumi Y, Noda NN. Structural basis of starvation-induced assembly of the autophagy initiation complex. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2014;21:513–521. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guimaraes RS, Delorme-Axford E, Klionsky DJ, Reggiori F. Assays for the biochemical and ultrastructural measurement of selective and nonselective types of autophagy in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods. 2015;75:141–150. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.11.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hollenstein DM, Gómez-Sánchez R, Ciftci A, Kriegenburg F, Mari M, Torggler R, Licheva M, Reggiori F, Kraft C. Vac8 spatially confines autophagosome formation at the vacuole in S. Cerevisiae. J Cell Sci. 2019;132:jcs235002. doi: 10.1242/jcs.235002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hollenstein DM, Kraft C. Autophagosomes are formed at a distinct cellular structure. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2020;65:50–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2020.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu Z, Raucci S, Jaquenoud M, Hatakeyama R, Stumpe M, Rohr R, Reggiori F, De Virgilio C, Dengjel J. Multilayered control of protein turnover by TORC1 and Atg1. Cell Rep. 2019;28:3486–3496.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kabeya Y, Kamada Y, Baba M, Takikawa H, Sasaki M, Ohsumi Y. Atg17 functions in cooperation with Atg1 and Atg13 in yeast autophagy. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:2544–2553. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e04-08-0669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kabeya Y, Noda NN, Fujioka Y, Suzuki K, Inagaki F, Ohsumi Y. Characterization of the Atg17-Atg29-Atg31 complex specifically required for starvation-induced autophagy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;389:612–615. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.09.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kamada Y, Funakoshi T, Shintani T, Nagano K, Ohsumi M, Ohsumi Y. Tor-mediated induction of autophagy via an Apg1 protein kinase complex. J Cell Biol. 2000;150:1507–1513. doi: 10.1083/jcb.150.6.1507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kamada Y, Yoshino K, Kondo C, Kawamata T, Oshiro N, Yonezawa K, Ohsumi Y. Tor directly controls the Atg1 kinase complex to regulate autophagy. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30:1049–1058. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01344-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kijanska M, Dohnal I, Reiter W, Kaspar S, Stoffel I, Ammerer G, Kraft C, Peter M. Activation of Atg1 kinase in autophagy by regulated phosphorylation. Autophagy. 2010;6:1168–1178. doi: 10.4161/auto.6.8.13849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kira S, Noguchi M, Araki Y, Oikawa Y, Yoshimori T, Miyahara A, Noda T. Vacuolar protein Tag1 and Atg1-Atg13 regulate autophagy termination during persistent starvation in S. cerevisiae. J Cell Sci. 2021;134:jcs253682. doi: 10.1242/jcs.253682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kraft C, Kijanska M, Kalie E, Siergiejuk E, Lee SS, Semplicio G, Stoffel I, Brezovich A, Verma M, Hansmann I, et al. Binding of the Atg1/ULK1 kinase to the ubiquitin-like protein Atg8 regulates autophagy. EMBO J. 2012;31:3691–3703. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kroschwald S, Maharana S, Simon A (2017) Hexanediol: a chemical probe to investigate the material properties of membrane-less compartments. Matters 10.19185/matters.201702000010
- Liu X, Mao K, Yu AYH, Omairi-Nasser A, Austin J, Glick BS, Yip CK, Klionsky DJ. The Atg17-Atg31-Atg29 complex coordinates with Atg11 to recruit the Vam7 SNARE and mediate autophagosome-vacuole fusion. Curr Biol. 2016;26:150–160. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mao K, Chew LH, Inoue-Aono Y, Cheong H, Nair U, Popelka H, Yip CK, Klionsky DJ. Atg29 phosphorylation regulates coordination of the Atg17-Atg31-Atg29 complex with the Atg11 scaffold during autophagy initiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:E2875–84. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300064110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Noda T, Klionsky DJ (2009) The quantitative Pho8Delta60 assay of nonspecific autophagy. 1st ed. Elsevier Inc. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Noda T, Ohsumi Y. Tor, a phosphatidylinositol kinase homologue, controls autophagy in yeast. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:3963–3966. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.7.3963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ong S-E, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I, Kristensen DB, Steen H, Pandey A, Mann M. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2002;1:376–386. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M200025-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pan ZQ, Shao GC, Liu XM, Chen Q, Dong MQ, Du LL. Atg1 kinase in fission yeast is activated by atg11-mediated dimerization and cis-autophosphorylation. Elife. 2020;9:1–17. doi: 10.7554/eLife.58073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Papinski D, Kraft C. Regulation of autophagy by signaling through the Atg1/ULK1 complex. J Mol Biol. 2016;428:1725–1741. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.03.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perez-Riverol Y, Bai J, Bandla C, García-Seisdedos D, Hewapathirana S, Kamatchinathan S, Kundu DJ, Prakash A, Frericks-Zipper A, Eisenacher M, et al. The PRIDE database resources in 2022: a hub for mass spectrometry-based proteomics evidences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;50:D543–D552. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pfaffenwimmer T, Reiter W, Brach T, Nogellova V, Papinski D, Schuschnig M, Abert C, Ammerer G, Martens S, Kraft C. Hrr25 kinase promotes selective autophagy by phosphorylating the cargo receptor Atg19. EMBO Rep. 2014;15:862–870. doi: 10.15252/embr.201438932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rangarajan N, Kapoor I, Li S, Drossopoulos P, White KK, Madden VJ, Dohlman HG. Potassium starvation induces autophagy in yeast. J Biol Chem. 2020;295:14189–14202. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.014687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reiter W, Anrather D, Dohnal I, Pichler P, Veis J, Grøtli M, Posas F, Ammerer G. Validation of regulated protein phosphorylation events in yeast by quantitative mass spectrometry analysis of purified proteins. Proteomics. 2012;12:3030–3043. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201200185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosebrock AP. Methods for synchronization and analysis of the budding yeast cell cycle. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2017;2017:5–7. doi: 10.1101/pdb.top080630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scott S, V, Guan J, Hutchins MU, Kim J, Klionsky DJ. Cvt19 is a receptor for the cytoplasm-to-vacuole targeting pathway. Mol Cell. 2001;7:1131–1141. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00263-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shintani T, Huang WP, Stromhaug PE, Klionsky DJ. Mechanism of cargo selection in the cytoplasm to vacuole targeting pathway. Dev Cell. 2002;3:825–837. doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00373-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sikorski RS, Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989;122:19–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suzuki H, Noda NN. Biophysical characterization of Atg11, a scaffold protein essential for selective autophagy in yeast. FEBS Open Bio. 2018;8:110–116. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.12355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Torggler R, Papinski D, Brach T, Bas L, Schuschnig M, Pfaffenwimmer T, Rohringer S, Matzhold T, Schweida D, Brezovich A, et al. Two independent pathways within selective autophagy converge to activate Atg1 kinase at the vacuole. Mol Cell. 2016;64:221–235. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Urban J, Soulard A, Huber A, Lippman S, Mukhopadhyay D, Deloche O, Wanke V, Anrather D, Ammerer G, Riezman H, et al. Sch9 is a major target of TORC1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell. 2007;26:663–674. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamamoto H, Fujioka Y, Suzuki SW, Noshiro D, Suzuki H, Kondo-Kakuta C, Kimura Y, Hirano H, Ando T, Noda NN, et al. The intrinsically disordered protein Atg13 mediates supramolecular assembly of autophagy initiation complexes. Dev Cell. 2016;38:86–99. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yao W, Li Y, Wu L, Wu C, Zhang Y, Liu J, He Z, Wu X, Lu C, Wang L, et al. Atg11 is required for initiation of glucose starvation-induced autophagy. Autophagy. 2020;16:2206–2218. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1719724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yokota H, Gomi K, Shintani T. Induction of autophagy by phosphate starvation in an Atg11-dependent manner in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017;483:522–527. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.12.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Young ARJ, Chan EYW, Hu XW, Köchl R, Crawshaw SG, High S, Hailey DW, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Tooze SA. Starvation and ULK1-dependent cycling of mammalian Atg9 between the TGN and endosomes. J Cell Sci. 2006;119:3888–3900. doi: 10.1242/jcs.03172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets produced in this study are available in the following database: Phospho-proteomic MS data: PRIDE PXD028461.