Skip to main content
International Journal of Oral Science logoLink to International Journal of Oral Science
. 2024 Feb 27;16:18. doi: 10.1038/s41368-023-00275-8

The neutrophil–osteogenic cell axis promotes bone destruction in periodontitis

Yutaro Ando 1,2,3, Masayuki Tsukasaki 4,, Nam Cong-Nhat Huynh 1,5, Shizao Zang 1, Minglu Yan 1, Ryunosuke Muro 1, Kazutaka Nakamura 1,6, Masatsugu Komagamine 1,7, Noriko Komatsu 1, Kazuo Okamoto 4, Kenta Nakano 8, Tadashi Okamura 8, Akira Yamaguchi 3, Kazuyuki Ishihara 2,3, Hiroshi Takayanagi 1,
PMCID: PMC10899642  PMID: 38413562

Abstract

The immune-stromal cell interactions play a key role in health and diseases. In periodontitis, the most prevalent infectious disease in humans, immune cells accumulate in the oral mucosa and promote bone destruction by inducing receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) expression in osteogenic cells such as osteoblasts and periodontal ligament cells. However, the detailed mechanism underlying immune–bone cell interactions in periodontitis is not fully understood. Here, we performed single-cell RNA-sequencing analysis on mouse periodontal lesions and showed that neutrophil–osteogenic cell crosstalk is involved in periodontitis-induced bone loss. The periodontal lesions displayed marked infiltration of neutrophils, and in silico analyses suggested that the neutrophils interacted with osteogenic cells through cytokine production. Among the cytokines expressed in the periodontal neutrophils, oncostatin M (OSM) potently induced RANKL expression in the primary osteoblasts, and deletion of the OSM receptor in osteogenic cells significantly ameliorated periodontitis-induced bone loss. Epigenomic data analyses identified the OSM-regulated RANKL enhancer region in osteogenic cells, and mice lacking this enhancer showed decreased periodontal bone loss while maintaining physiological bone metabolism. These findings shed light on the role of neutrophils in bone regulation during bacterial infection, highlighting the novel mechanism underlying osteoimmune crosstalk.

Subject terms: Periodontitis, Bone

Introduction

The oral cavity, a gateway to the digestive and respiratory systems, harbors an estimated 1 000 bacterial species.1 Dysbiosis in oral microbial communities stimulates host immune responses and causes periodontitis, the most prevalent infectious disease in humans.25 Periodontitis is the primary cause of adult tooth loss and also affects various systemic diseases including diabetes, pneumonia, cardiovascular diseases, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and inflammatory bowel disease.611 Thus, a detailed understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying oral mucosal immunopathology is critical for developing therapeutic and preventive strategies against periodontitis and its comorbidities.

Recent advances in single-cell and spatial multiomics technologies have provided a cellular landscape of oral mucosal lesions, critically contributing to our understanding of the pathogenesis underlying periodontitis.1217 Previous studies have shown that various immune cells, including T cells, B cells, and myeloid cells, accumulate in periodontitis lesions and may interact with stromal cells such as fibroblasts and epithelial cells.12,1518 However, the in vivo relevance of immune–stromal cell interactions in periodontitis has not been proven by loss-of-function approaches, and it remains unclear how the complex cellular interactions ultimately induce osteoclastic bone resorption.

Experimental animal models are critical tools to investigate the mechanisms of disease pathogenesis. The ligature-induced periodontitis mouse model is the most widely used experimental model in the field, and genetic loss-of-function studies using this model have revealed that various immune cells such as T helper 17 (TH17) cells play an essential role in periodontal bone destruction.4,19,20 Receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), the master cytokine inducing osteoclast differentiation and activation, is mainly produced by osteogenic cells including osteoblasts and periodontal ligament (PDL) cells during periodontitis.4,21,22 Inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 17 A/F (IL-17A/F) and IL-6 stimulate RANKL expression in osteoblasts and PDL cells.4 However, the genetic deletion of these cytokines only partly inhibits periodontitis-induced bone destruction, suggesting that other factors may also contribute to the induction of RANKL in osteogenic cells.4,22 To obtain a comprehensive picture of the pathogenesis of periodontitis, it is necessary to understand the detailed molecular mechanisms underlying RANKL induction in osteogenic cells during periodontal inflammation.

In this study, we demonstrated that the neutrophil–osteogenic cell interaction promotes bone destruction in periodontitis through oncostatin M (OSM)/OSM receptor (OSMR) signaling. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analyses of the mouse periodontal lesions revealed that inflammatory neutrophils markedly accumulated in the periodontal lesions. Inflammatory neutrophils highly expressed OSM, which strongly induced RANKL expression in osteogenic cells. Periodontitis-induced bone loss was inhibited in osteogenic cell-specific OSMR-deficient mice, demonstrating the in vivo relevance of OSM-mediated neutrophil–osteogenic cell crosstalk. We identified the OSM-regulated RANKL enhancer region in osteogenic cells, and mice lacking this enhancer displayed decreased periodontal bone loss while maintaining physiological bone metabolism. Together, the results of this study reveal the detailed mechanisms underlying bone damage associated with periodontitis, providing a novel example of immune–stromal cell interactions in infectious diseases.

Results

Single-cell landscape of mouse periodontal lesions

To understand the cellular microenvironment underlying periodontal bone destruction at a single-cell resolution, we performed scRNA-seq using cells derived from the periodontal tissue of ligature-induced periodontitis mice at 7 days after ligature placement when the marked infiltration of immune cells and accelerated bone destruction were observed in previous studies.4,19,20,23 Unsupervised graph-based clustering analysis showed that the mouse periodontal lesions comprised immune cells (neutrophils, macrophages, TH17 cells, and B cells), epithelial cells, vascular endothelial cells (VEC), mural cells, and osteogenic cells (Fig. 1a, b). We annotated the osteogenic cell cluster, which is characterized by the expression of marker genes for both osteoblasts (Sp7 and Runx2) and PDL cells (S100a4 and Postn). Since PDL cells have osteogenic capacity and serve as the local source of osteoblasts in vivo, it is difficult to rigorously discriminate between PDL cells and osteoblastic cells using sequencing data.24,25

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Neutrophils interact with osteogenic cells through cytokine production in periodontitis. a Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) plot of cells from the periodontal tissues of ligature-induced periodontitis mice (n = 5). b Dot plot of the expression of representative genes for each cluster. Each cell type was annotated using these marker genes. c Heat map showing the network intensity of interactions between immune cells (sender) and stromal cells (target). d Proportion of Gene Ontology terms on molecules mediating the effect of neutrophils on osteogenic cells. e Micro-CT analysis of periodontitis-induced bone loss in mice treated with isotype-control (rat IgG2a) and anti-Ly6G antibodies (n = 3 and n = 5, respectively). Scale bars, 1 mm. The upper red dotted line indicates the cement–enamel junction, and the lower red dotted line indicates the alveolar bone crest in the left panel. The periodontal bone loss was quantified in the right panel

To gain insights into the role of immune–stromal cell interactions in bone destruction associated with periodontitis, we performed CellChat analysis, a quantitative tool for measuring intercellular signaling networks, using our scRNA-seq data.26 We calculated the mean interaction intensity between immune cells and stromal cells, and found that the interplay between neutrophils and osteogenic cells was pronounced among intercellular interactions in the periodontal lesions (Fig. 1c, Supplementary Fig. S1a). The interaction between neutrophils and VEC in the periodontitis pathogenesis has been well documented by previous studies,2730 but the role of neutrophil-osteogenic crosstalk in periodontitis has never been reported. Since osteogenic cells represent the major source of RANKL in the periodontal bone damage, we focused on the neutrophil-osteogenic axis. The CellChat analysis data suggested that osteogenic cells act on neutrophils by expressing various factors including cell adhesion molecules and chemokines (Supplementary Fig. S1b). The effect of neutrophils on osteogenic cells is suggested to be largely dependent on the cytokines produced by neutrophils (Fig. 1d). To assess the importance of neutrophils in the periodontal bone destruction in vivo, we depleted neutrophils by injecting anti-Ly6G antibody, which led to the significant inhibition of periodontitis-induced bone loss (Fig. 1e). These findings suggest that neutrophils may interact with osteogenic cells through cytokine production and promote bone destruction in periodontitis.

OSM stimulates RANKL expression in osteogenic cells

Since osteogenic cells function as the primary source of RANKL in periodontal bone loss, we hypothesized that neutrophils may contribute to periodontal bone loss by inducing RANKL expression in osteogenic cells through cytokine production. We analyzed the CellChat data by focusing on the cytokine-mediated interaction between neutrophils and osteogenic cells, and found that tumor necrosis factor (TNF), IL-1β, and OSM displayed high communication intensity in the neutrophil-osteogenic network (Fig. 2a). These cytokines are specifically expressed in neutrophils in the periodontal lesion (Fig. 2b). Among the three cytokines, OSM had the strongest capacity to induce RANKL expression in mouse calvaria-derived primary osteoblasts in vitro (Fig. 2c). We confirmed that OSM significantly upregulates the expression of osteoblastic RANKL at the protein level (Fig. 2d). The scRNA-seq data analysis of human periodontal lesions also showed that OSM and OSMR were highly expressed in neutrophils and PDL cells, respectively (Fig. 2e). The CellChat analysis suggested that the OSM/OSMR axis also mediates the neutrophil-PDL interaction in human periodontal lesions (Fig. 2f).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

OSM stimulates RANKL expression in osteogenic cells and promotes bone destruction in periodontitis. a Chord diagram showing cytokine signaling interaction pairs in the neutrophil-osteogenic network. b Dot plot showing the expression of TNF, IL-1β, and OSM in the scRNA-seq clusters of the mouse periodontitis lesion. c qPCR analysis of Tnfsf11 transcripts in calvaria-derived primary osteoblasts treated with TNF, IL-1β, OSM or Vitamin D plus Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) (n = 4). The data were obtained from duplicate experiments. d RANKL concentration measured by ELISA in the lysate of primary osteoblasts treated with or without OSM. e Dot plot showing the expression of OSM and OSMR in scRNA-seq clusters of the human periodontitis lesion. f Chord diagram showing the OSM signaling interaction pairs in the cell-cell network of the human periodontitis lesion. g Micro-CT analysis of periodontitis-induced bone loss in the control (n = 3) and Osmrflox/flox Sp7-Cre mice (n = 5). Scale bars, 1 mm. The upper red dotted line indicates the cement–enamel junction and the lower red dotted line indicates the alveolar bone crest in the left panel. The periodontal bone loss was quantified in the right panel

To investigate the importance of OSMR signaling in osteogenic cells in periodontitis-induced bone damage in vivo, we crossed OSMR-floxed mice with Sp7-Cre mice. In the periodontal tissue, Sp7-Cre was shown to target both osteoblasts and PDL cells.22 Because OSMR signaling in osteoblastic cells is involved in physiological bone metabolism,31 we used a Sp7-tTA-tetO-Cre (Sp7-Cre) system in which Cre recombinase is expressed only when a tetracycline-controlled transactivator (tTA) binds to a tetracycline responsive element (tetO) in the absence of doxycycline (Dox). Sp7-Cre mice crossed with OSMR-floxed mice were treated from the prenatal period with Dox, which was withdrawn at the age of 4 weeks. This protocol did not affect skeletal growth in the mice (Supplementary Fig. S2a–c). We induced periodontitis at the age of 8 weeks, and the alveolar bone was analyzed 10 days after ligature placement. Notably, periodontitis-induced bone loss was significantly inhibited in the Osmrflox/flox Sp7-Cre mice (Fig. 2g). These results suggest that neutrophil-derived OSM binds to the OSMR on osteogenic cells and promotes RANKL expression, underscoring the relevance of the neutrophil–osteogenic cell interaction in bone destruction associated with periodontitis.

Identification of the OSM-regulated RANKL enhancer region

OSM stimulates RANKL expression in osteoblastic cells by activating the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) transcription factor. In addition, three STAT3-binding sites upstream of the Tnfsf11 locus, namely RANKL distal enhancer 4 (RL-D4), RL-D5, and RL-D6, have been reported (Fig. 3a).32,33 We analyzed various publicly available epigenomic datasets of mouse osteoblastic cells and found that active enhancer markers including histone H3 lysine 27 acetylation (H3K27ac), histone H3 lysine 4 monomethylation (H3K4me1), and histone H4 lysine 5 acetylation (H4K5ac) as well as assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing (ATAC-seq) peak were enriched in these STAT3-binding sites, suggesting that these regions may function as active enhancers in osteoblastic cells.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Identification of the OSM-regulated RANKL enhancer region in osteogenic cells. a H3K4me1, H3K4me3, H4K5ac, and H3K27ac ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq profiles in mouse osteogenic cells (GSE51515, GSE54782, and GSE174045) and T cells (ENCFF021TWR). The gray shaded areas indicate the RANKL distal enhancer regions (RL-D4, RL-D5, and RL-D6). b H3K27ac, H3K4me1, and H3K4me2 ChIP-seq profiles in human osteogenic cells (GSE29611) and DNase-seq profile in human PDL fibroblasts (ENCFF021TWR). The gray shaded areas indicate the human homologous areas of the RL-D4, RL-D5, and RL-D6 regions. c Schematic depicting the STAT-binding motifs and the predicted binding sites within the human homologous region of RL-D4

In human datasets, the homologous region of RL-D4 displayed the highest enrichment of active enhancer markers in osteoblastic cells and PDL cells (Fig. 3b). We confirmed that the binding motifs of STAT transcription factors were present in the human homologous region of RL-D4 (Fig. 3c). Previous studies have shown that deletion of RL-D5 or RL-D6 partly inhibits OSM-induced RANKL expression in osteoblastic cells, but the importance of RL-D4 in physiological or pathological bone metabolism has not been explored.3235 Therefore, we evaluated the role of the RL-D4 region in periodontitis-induced bone loss by generating mice lacking the RL-D4 region using clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9)-mediated genome editing technology. The successful generation of RL-D4-knockout (KO) mice was confirmed by Sanger DNA sequencing (Supplementary Fig. S3a). The RL-D4-KO mice were born at the expected Mendelian frequency and displayed normal tooth eruption and a body size similar to that of littermate wild-type (WT) controls (Supplementary Fig. S3b).

Periodontitis-induced bone loss is inhibited in RL-D4-deficient mice

To investigate the importance of the RL-D4 region in physiological bone remodeling, we first analyzed the long bones of RL-D4-KO mice at steady state. Microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) analyses showed that RL-D4-KO mice had normal bone phenotype compared to WT mice under physiological conditions (Fig. 4a, b). Dynamic bone histomorphometry showed no difference between WT and RL-D4-KO mice in both osteoclastic and osteoblastic parameters (Fig. 4c, d).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

The RANKL enhancer RL-D4 is involved in periodontitis-induced bone loss but not in physiological bone remodeling. Representative micro-CT images (a) and micro-CT parameters (b) of the femur in female WT and RL-D4-KO mice at the age of 12 weeks (n = 4 and n = 4). Scale bars, 1 mm. c Toluidine blue and TRAP staining of the proximal tibias of WT and RL-D4-KO mice at the age of 12 weeks. The data are representative of at least three independent experiments. Scale bars, 100 μm. d Bone histomorphometric analysis of the proximal tibias of WT and RL-D4-KO mice at the age of 12 weeks (n = 3 and n = 8). e Micro-CT analysis of periodontitis-induced bone loss in WT (n = 11) and RL-D4-KO mice (n = 5). The upper red dotted line indicates the cement–enamel junction and the lower red dotted line indicates the alveolar bone crest in the left panel. Scale bars, 1 mm. Periodontal bone loss was quantified in the right panel. f qPCR analysis of the Tnfsf11 transcripts in the calvaria-derived primary osteoblasts from WT mice and RL-D4-KO mice treated with OSM (n = 4). The data were obtained from duplicate experiments

To assess the involvement of RL-D4 in periodontal bone damage, we induced experimental periodontitis in the RL-D4-deficient mice and found that the periodontitis-induced bone loss was significantly inhibited in these animals (Fig. 4e). We isolated primary osteoblasts from the calvaria of RL-D4-deficient mice, and found that OSM-induced RANKL expression was significantly inhibited in the absence of the RL-D4 region (Fig. 4f). These data suggest that the RL-D4 region is not required for physiological bone remodeling but contributes to periodontal bone destruction, possibly by mediating OSM-induced RANKL expression in osteogenic cells.

Taken together, our findings indicate that neutrophils contribute to bone destruction in periodontitis by activating the OSMR/RL-D4/RANKL axis in osteogenic cells.

Discussion

Neutrophils are the most abundant phagocytes in the bloodstream of humans, functioning as a key component of the innate immune system.30,36 Excessive neutrophil infiltration exacerbates the pathogenesis of periodontitis in humans and mice.37,38 Activated neutrophils promote periodontal tissue degradation by producing matrix metalloproteinases and reactive oxygen species. Recent studies have suggested that neutrophil extracellular traps may also contribute to periodontal bone destruction by activating TH17 cells.39,40 In this study, we demonstrated that neutrophils may stimulate osteogenic RANKL expression through cytokine secretion, providing novel insights into the role of neutrophils in the pathogenesis of periodontitis. In addition to OSM, our scRNA-seq data showed that periodontal neutrophils highly expressed IL-1 and TNF, suggesting that neutrophils may act as an important source of osteoclastogenic cytokines in periodontal bone loss.41,42 Since the marked accumulation of neutrophils was also reported in an apical periodontitis model,43 the neutrophil-osteogenic cell axis may have a role in bone damage associated with endodontic infection. On the other hand, neutrophils can exert anti-inflammatory and bone-protective functions as evidenced by the fact that the neutrophil depletion delayed bone regeneration in a cranial defect model.44 The enhanced immune imbalance and bone destruction were reported in Leukocyte Adhesion Deficiency Type I (LAD1) patients in which poor or no recruitment of neutrophils triggers overactivation of TH17 cells in the periodontal tissues.45,46 These studies showed that either too few or too many neutrophils can exacerbate periodontitis, highlighting the importance of the precise coordination of neutrophil recruitment in periodontal tissue homeostasis. Additional studies are needed to provide a comprehensive picture of the role of neutrophils in the pathogenesis of periodontitis.

OSM is involved in various inflammatory diseases such as dermatitis, RA, and colitis.47 The cellular source of OSM in dermatitis and RA is T cells and macrophages,48,49 respectively. OSM promotes osteoclastic bone resorption by increasing RANKL expression in osteogenic cells. Previous studies showed that macrophage-derived OSM promotes osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells,50,51 and OSM could inhibit sclerostin expression in osteocytes.31 Thus, the cellular source of OSM is context-specific and the effect of OSM on bone is dependent on the target cell type. In both human and mouse scRNA-seq datasets, the expression levels of OSM are higher in neutrophils than in macrophages (Fig. 2b, e). Analogous to our findings in periodontitis, OSM is mainly produced by neutrophils and contributes to the pathogenesis of colitis by mediating neutrophil–stromal cell interactions, suggesting the shared mechanisms underlying mucosal immunopathologies.52,53 Clinically, protein levels of OSM in the gingival crevicular fluid are reportedly higher in patients with periodontitis than in healthy controls, suggesting the involvement of OSM in the pathogenesis of human periodontitis.54 As inhibition of the IL-23/IL-17 axis by ustekinumab is effective for the treatment of patients with severe hereditary periodontitis, inhibition of the OSM/RANKL axis may represent a potential therapeutic target to mitigate bone destruction in patients with severe hereditary periodontitis.46

RANKL is a multifunctional cytokine that plays an essential role in various biological systems including the bone and immune system.5,55 Our group and others have identified RANKL enhancer regions that function in cell type- and context- dependent manners.3234,5659 In physiological bone remodeling, the intronic enhancer, RL-D2, and RL-D5 regions control RANKL expression in mesenchymal cells including osteocytes and osteoblasts.33,58,60 The intronic enhancer in osteocytic cells is activated by cellular senescence signals,58 which were also shown to stimulate RANKL expression in periodontal ligament cells and cementoblasts.61 We previously demonstrated that periodontitis-induced bone loss and osteoclast development were markedly suppressed when RANKL was deleted in osteoblastic cells and periodontal ligament cells.4 In our scRNA-seq dataset, the osteoblastic cells (characterized by expression of Sp7 and Runx2) and periodontal ligament fibroblasts (characterized by expression S100a4 and Postn) were clustered as a single population due to the limited number of cells compared to previous scRNA-seq studies.17,62 This is a major limitation of the current study and it will be needed to clarify relative contribution of RANKL on periodontal ligament fibroblasts and osteoblasts to periodontal bone loss in future studies.

In bone destruction associated with RA, the distal enhancer E3 region regulates RANKL expression in synovial fibroblasts.59 The findings of the current study indicate that the STAT3-binding RL-D4 region may be involved in OSM-induced RANKL expression in osteogenic cells and contribute to bone damage in periodontitis. RL-D4 is the same region as E2 in our previous study on RA synovial fibroblasts59; this region did not contribute to RANKL induction in the synovial fibroblasts. These findings indicate that the osteogenic cells and synovial fibroblasts utilize distinct enhancers for RANKL regulation under inflammatory conditions. Because other members of the IL-6 family of cytokines also activate STAT3 and promote RANKL expression in osteogenic cells, it is possible that the inhibition of periodontal bone loss in RL-D4-KO mice is a combined effect of OSM and other cytokines such as IL-6. As both RL-D5 and RL-D6 regions are reportedly involved in OSM-induced RANKL expression in osteoblastic cells in vitro,60 further studies are required to examine the contribution of these enhancers to periodontitis-induced bone loss, and to elucidate the role of RL-D4 region beyond periodontitis.

Intriguingly, the inflammation-associated enhancers including RL-D4, RL-D5, RL-D6, and E3 are located in the intergenic region between RANKL and A-kinase anchoring protein 11, an area that has been expanded during vertebrate evolution.63 We suspect that the emergence of such inflammation-associated RANKL enhancers during evolution may have linked immune activation to osteoclastic bone resorption and thus driven the emergence of inflammatory bone disease, the earliest evidence of which is periodontitis-induced bone damage in a 275 million-year-old terrestrial reptile.

Recent advances in single-cell technologies have revealed cellular heterogeneity at an unprecedented level of resolution, and increasing attention has been paid to the interaction between immune and stromal cells based on the computational inference of intercellular interactions using single-cell sequencing data.64,65 In this study, we demonstrated that neutrophil–osteogenic cell crosstalk through the OSM/OSMR axis promotes bone damage associated with periodontitis, providing a novel example of immune–stromal interactions. Further investigations into such cellular interactions will help provide an understanding of the pathogenesis of various diseases including periodontitis.

Methods

Mice

All animals were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions, and all experiments were performed with approval of the institutional review board at The University of Tokyo (Tokyo, Japan). C57BL/6 mice were purchased from CLEA Japan, Inc. (Shizuoka, Japan). Osmrflox/flox mice were obtained from the Jaxon Laboratory. Sp7-Cre mice were previously described.4,55 RL-D4-KO mice were generated using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing technology on the C57BL/6J background. Single guide RNA targeting the sequences of the RANKL distal enhancer region (5′-TGTCCTAAAATGTTGCCATG-3′ and 5′-AATGTGAATGATCACAAGCA-3′) and hCas9 mRNA were prepared as previously described.59 Primers for detection of the RL-D4-KO allele were as follows: forward, 5′-TTTCGTTGCAAAGTGGGATGAAG-3′ and reverse, 5′- ACCATTAGCATTCTGGACTGAGAA-3′. The PCR product of the RL-D4-KO allele (362 base pairs) was further sequenced using the forward primer to confirm that the founder progenies harbored the enhancer region deletion (3 412 base pair deletion corresponding to GRCm39 chr14: 78,613,540–78,616,951/GRCm38 chr14: 78,376,100–78,379,511). Founder progenies were mated with C57BL/6J WT mice to generate heterozygous offspring and subsequently intercrossed to generate WT and RL-D4-KO littermate progeny. Age- and sex-matched mice were used for all of the experiments unless otherwise noted.

Ligature-induced periodontitis mouse model

To evaluate the periodontitis-induced bone loss, a 5-0 silk ligature was tied around the maxillary left second molar, and the contralateral tooth was left unligated to serve as the baseline control, as previously described.4,19 The mice were sacrificed and analyzed with micro-CT 10 days after ligature application. Prior to micro-CT inspection, the maxillae were preserved in a 70% ethanol solution. Micro-CT scanning was performed with the ScanXmate-A100S Scanner (Comscantechno Co. Ltd., Kanagawa, Japan). Three-dimensional microstructural image data were reconstructed and structural indices were calculated using TRI/3D-BON bone analysis software (RATOC System Engineering Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Mice in which the ligatures were lost were excluded from the data.

Single-cell RNA-seq and data analysis

To isolate single cells from the periodontal tissues, we collected cells from gingival tissues and the alveolar bone surface by curetting with forceps. Subsequently, the obtained periodontal tissues were cut into small pieces and digested in 2 mg/mL Collagenase Type 2 (Worthington Biochemical Corp.) and 1 mg/mL DNase Type 1 (Sigma) for 20 min at 37 °C. 0.5 mol/L EDTA was added and the tissue was incubated for another 10 min at 37 °C. After enzymatic digestion, periodontal cells were collected by centrifugation, following filtration through a 70 µm mesh. Single-cell RNA-seq analysis was performed with the 10x Genomics Chromium system (10x Genomics, Pleasanton, CA, USA). Single cells were isolated from the periodontal tissues of five mice with periodontitis. The sequencing libraries were generated from these cells using the 10x Genomics Single-cell 3′ Solution Kit (v.3) and then subjected to Illumina sequencing (HiSeq 4000 Sequencing System; Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Alignment and quantitation of sample count matrices were performed using the 10x Genomics Cell Ranger Pipeline (v.3.0) and mouse reference sequences (version mm10) as indicated in the manufacturer’s protocol. Downstream analysis was performed using the Seurat R package (v.4.3.0.1). We primarily filtered out genes expressed in <3 cells and cells with <200 genes. Cells with greater than 10% mitochondrial reads, 7 500 nFeature_RNA, and 60 000 nCounts RNA were also excluded. After quality control, data normalization was performed using the NormalizeData function in Seurat, and the top 2 000 variable features were identified. The Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection dimensional reduction technique was applied to visualize the clusters at a resolution of 0.1. The cell–cell communication was analyzed using the CellChat v1.6.1R package.26

Administration of anti-Ly6G antibody in vivo

Mice were administered an intraperitoneal dose of 0.4 mg of anti-Ly6G antibody (clone 1A8, BioXCell) or a rat IgG2a isotype control (clone 2A3, BioXCell). The antibody was injected on a schedule of four time points: one day before ligature placement, and 2, 5, and 8 days after ligature placement. Bone loss was subsequently measured 10 days after ligature placement.

Cytokine stimulation assay

We isolated primary osteoblasts from the calvaria of newborns by enzymatic digestion using Alpha Minimum Essential Medium (11900024; Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 0.1% collagenase (038-22361; Wako Chemicals, Osaka, Japan) and 0.2% Dispase II (383-02281; Wako Chemicals), as previously described.58 After digestion, osteoblasts were collected and seeded in 24-well plates. After 1day of incubation, cells were stimulated with IL-1β (R&D, 401-ML), TNF-α (R&D, 410-MT), and OSM (R&D, 495-MO) at a concentration of 50 ng/mL. After 72 h, stimulated osteoblasts were collected and subjected to quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays. In the experiment to examine the induction of RANKL expression by OSM in calvaria-derived osteoblasts from RL-D4-deficient mice, cells were collected in the same manner described above. These osteoblasts were seeded in 24-well plates. After 1 day of incubation, cells were stimulated with OSM at a concentration of 100 ng/mL. After 6 h, stimulated osteoblasts were collected and subjected to qPCR assays.

ELISA

The isolation of the primary osteoblasts was described above. After enzymatic digestion, osteoblasts were collected and seeded in 6-well plates. After 1 day of incubation, cells were stimulated with OSM (R&D, 495-MO) at a concentration of 50 ng/mL. After 72 h, cell lysates were collected from the osteoblasts with RIPA Buffer (nacalai tesque) containing 1% Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (nacalai tesque) and subjected to ELISA. ELISA was performed according to the manufacture’s protocol (R&D SYSTEMS).

qPCR analysis

Total RNA was extracted from isolated cells using the ReliaPrep RNA Miniprep System (Z6011; Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and reverse transcribed with SuperScript III (11752-250; Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). qPCR was performed with a LightCycler (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) using SYBR Green (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). The results were normalized to Gapdh expression level. The primers used were: Gapdh, 5′-TCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTA-3′ and 5′-ACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC-3′; Tnfsf11, 5′-AGCCATTTGCACACCTCAC-3′ and 5′-CGTGGTACCAAGAGGACAGAGT-3′.

Analysis of the long bones

For micro-CT analysis, femurs were isolated from WT and RL-D4-KO mice and fixed in 70% ethanol. CT scanning was performed using the ScanXmate-A100S Scanner (Comscantechno). Three-dimensional microstructural image data were reconstructed, and structural indices were calculated using TRI/3D-BON software (RATOC). For histomorphometric analyses, tibias from WT and RL-D4-KO mice were dissected, fixed in 70% ethanol, and subjected to standard dynamic bone histomorphometric analyses as previously described.58 Toluidine blue and TRAP staining images were captured using the BZ-II Analyzer (Keyence Co., Osaka, Japan).

ChIP-seq data and motif analyses

ChIP-seq data were downloaded from the GEO and ENCODE Project databases and visualized using the Integrative Genomics Viewer (version 2.3.12).66 Position weight matrices (PWMs) for motifs were obtained from the JASPAR database (https://jaspar.genereg.net/).67 We analyzed the transcription factor-binding sites within the input sequence of GRCh37 chr13: 43,058,344-43,062,075 using the JASPAR database. For motif identification, we employed FIMO68 with the default threshold value set to q < 10−4.

Statistical analyses

Data were analyzed on GraphPad Prism software v9.5.1 and R software v4.3.1. Statistical tests, n-values, replicate experiments, and P-values are all indicated in the figures and/or legends. All data are expressed as the mean ± s.e.m. P-values were calculated using Student’s t test, analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunnett’s or Tukey’s multiple-comparison test (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.000 1, throughout the paper).

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 (3.1MB, pdf)
Supplementary Figure 2 (1.1MB, pdf)
Supplementary Figure 3 (4.5MB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We thank S. Yin, K. Kusubata, A. Suematsu, K. Kubo, T. Tsubokawa, N. Takeda, and I. Komuro for thoughtful discussion and valuable technical assistance. This work was supported in part by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) under grant number JP20ek0410073, JP23ek0410108, JP22ek0410100, AMED-CREST under grant number JP19gm1210008 and AMED-PRIME under grant number JP21gm6310029, the AMED Japan Initiative for World leading Vaccine Research and Development Centers (JP223fa627001); Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS): Scientific Research S (21H05046), Scientific Research B (21H03104, 22H03195, and 22H02844) and Challenging Research (20K21515 and 21K18254); and the JST FOREST Program (JPMJFR2261, JPMJFR205Z). Y.A. was supported by a JSPS Research Fellowship for Young Scientists (23KJ1949) and Japanese Society for Immunology (JSI) Kibou Scholarship for Doctoral Students in Immunology.

Author contributions

Y.A. performed most of the experiments, analyzed the data, and prepared the manuscript. M.T. conceived the project, designed the experiments, analyzed and interpreted data, and wrote the manuscript. N.C.N.H., Z.S., M.Y., R.M., K.N., M.K., N.K., K.O., K.N., T.O., A.Y., and K.I. contributed to data collection and interpretation. H.T. directed the project and wrote the manuscript.

Data availability

All data that support the plots within this paper are available in the main text. The referenced publicly available datasets were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (scRNA-seq data of human periodontal lesions; GSE164241, the epigenomic datasets of osteogenic cell epigenomic datasets; GSE51515, GSE54782, and GSM733779) and ENCODE Project databases (DNase-seq data of human PDL fibroblasts; ENCDO247AAA). The processed files of scRNA-seq data for mouse periodontitis are deposited in the GEO under accession GSE254766.

Competing interests

The Department of Osteoimmunology is an endowment department supported with an unrestricted grant from AYUMI Pharmaceutical Corporation, ELECOM, JCR Pharmaceuticals, Kondo Cotton Spinning, MIKIHOUSE, MITSUI FUDOSAN, Meiji, Noevir, TAKENAKA, TENNENBUTSU IKAGAKU KENKYU ZAIDAN and Yakult.

Contributor Information

Masayuki Tsukasaki, Email: tsuka-im@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

Hiroshi Takayanagi, Email: takayana@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41368-023-00275-8.

References

  • 1.Lamont RJ, Koo H, Hajishengallis G. The oral microbiota: dynamic communities and host interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2018;16:745–759. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0089-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Darveau RP. Periodontitis: a polymicrobial disruption of host homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010;8:481–490. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Maekawa T, et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis manipulates complement and TLR signaling to uncouple bacterial clearance from inflammation and promote dysbiosis. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;15:768–778. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.05.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tsukasaki M, et al. Host defense against oral microbiota by bone-damaging T cells. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:701. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03147-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tsukasaki M, Takayanagi H. Osteoimmunology: evolving concepts in bone–immune interactions in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2019;19:626–642. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0178-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hajishengallis G, Chavakis T. Local and systemic mechanisms linking periodontal disease and inflammatory comorbidities. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2021;21:426–440. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-00488-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Genco RJ, Sanz M. Clinical and public health implications of periodontal and systemic diseases: An overview. Periodontol 2000. 2020;83:7–13. doi: 10.1111/prd.12344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Xiao E, et al. Diabetes Enhances IL-17 Expression and Alters the Oral Microbiome to Increase Its Pathogenicity. Cell Host Microbe. 2017;22:120–128.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.06.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Graves DT, Ding Z, Yang Y. The impact of diabetes on periodontal diseases. Periodontol 2000. 2020;82:214–224. doi: 10.1111/prd.12318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mammen MJ, Scannapieco FA, Sethi S. Oral-lung microbiome interactions in lung diseases. Periodontol 2000. 2020;83:234–241. doi: 10.1111/prd.12301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kitamoto S, et al. The Intermucosal Connection between the Mouth and Gut in Commensal Pathobiont-Driven Colitis. Cell. 2020;182:447–462.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Caetano, A. J. et al. Defining human mesenchymal and epithelial heterogeneity in response to oral inflammatory disease. Elife10, e62810 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 13.Caetano AJ, Human Cell Atlas Oral and Craniofacial Bionetwork. Sequeira I, Byrd KM. A Roadmap for the Human Oral and Craniofacial Cell Atlas. J. Dent. Res. 2022;101:1274–1288. doi: 10.1177/00220345221110768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Caetano, A. J. et al. Spatially resolved transcriptomics reveals pro-inflammatory fibroblast involved in lymphocyte recruitment through CXCL8 and CXCL10. Elife12, e81525 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 15.Qian S-J, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing identifies new inflammation-promoting cell subsets in Asian patients with chronic periodontitis. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:711337. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.711337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Williams DW, et al. Human oral mucosa cell atlas reveals a stromal-neutrophil axis regulating tissue immunity. Cell. 2021;184:4090–4104.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.05.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kondo, T., Gleason, A., Okawa, H., Hokugo, A. & Nishimura, I. Mouse gingival single-cell transcriptomic atlas: An activated fibroblast subpopulation guides oral barrier immunity in periodontitis. eLife10.7554/elife.88183 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 18.Kondo T, et al. Oral microbial extracellular DNA initiates periodontitis through gingival degradation by fibroblast-derived cathepsin K in mice. Commun. Biol. 2022;5:962. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03896-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Abe T, Hajishengallis G. Optimization of the ligature-induced periodontitis model in mice. J. Immunol. Methods. 2013;394:49–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2013.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dutzan, N. et al. A dysbiotic microbiome triggers TH17 cells to mediate oral mucosal immunopathology in mice and humans. Sci. Transl. Med. 10, eaat0797 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 21.Udagawa N, et al. Osteoclast differentiation by RANKL and OPG signaling pathways. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 2021;39:19–26. doi: 10.1007/s00774-020-01162-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tsukasaki M. RANKL and osteoimmunology in periodontitis. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 2021;39:82–90. doi: 10.1007/s00774-020-01165-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kourtzelis I, et al. DEL-1 promotes macrophage efferocytosis and clearance of inflammation. Nat. Immunol. 2019;20:40–49. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0249-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Men Y, et al. Gli1+ periodontium stem cells are regulated by osteocytes and occlusal force. Dev. Cell. 2020;54:639–654.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Iwayama, T. et al. Plap-1 lineage tracing and single-cell transcriptomics reveal cellular dynamics in the periodontal ligament. Development149, dev201203 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 26.Jin S, et al. Inference and analysis of cell-cell communication using CellChat. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:1088. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21246-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Eskan MA, et al. The leukocyte integrin antagonist Del-1 inhibits IL-17-mediated inflammatory bone loss. Nat. Immunol. 2012;13:465–473. doi: 10.1038/ni.2260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shin J, et al. DEL-1 restrains osteoclastogenesis and inhibits inflammatory bone loss in nonhuman primates. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015;7:307ra155. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aac5380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schmidt EP, Lee WL, Zemans RL, Yamashita C, Downey GP. On, around, and through: neutrophil-endothelial interactions in innate immunity. Physiology. 2011;26:334–347. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00011.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hajishengallis G. New developments in neutrophil biology and periodontitis. Periodontol 2000. 2020;82:78–92. doi: 10.1111/prd.12313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Walker EC, et al. Oncostatin M promotes bone formation independently of resorption when signaling through leukemia inhibitory factor receptor in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2010;120:582–592. doi: 10.1172/JCI40568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Galli C, et al. Targeted deletion of a distant transcriptional enhancer of the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand gene reduces bone remodeling and increases bone mass. Endocrinology. 2008;149:146–153. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-0734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Onal M, et al. Unique distal enhancers linked to the mouse Tnfsf11 gene direct tissue-specific and inflammation-induced expression of RANKL. Endocrinology. 2016;157:482–496. doi: 10.1210/en.2015-1788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bishop KA, Meyer MB, Pike JW. A novel distal enhancer mediates cytokine induction of mouse RANKl gene expression. Mol. Endocrinol. 2009;23:2095–2110. doi: 10.1210/me.2009-0209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Onal M, et al. The RANKL distal control region is required for the increase in RANKL expression, but not the bone loss, associated with hyperparathyroidism or lactation in adult mice. Mol. Endocrinol. 2012;26:341–348. doi: 10.1210/me.2011-1149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Silva LM, Kim TS, Moutsopoulos NM. Neutrophils are gatekeepers of mucosal immunity. Immunol. Rev. 2023;314:125–141. doi: 10.1111/imr.13171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dutzan N, Konkel JE, Greenwell-Wild T, Moutsopoulos NM. Characterization of the human immune cell network at the gingival barrier. Mucosal Immunol. 2016;9:1163–1172. doi: 10.1038/mi.2015.136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Landzberg M, Doering H, Aboodi GM, Tenenbaum HC, Glogauer M. Quantifying oral inflammatory load: oral neutrophil counts in periodontal health and disease. J. Periodontal Res. 2015;50:330–336. doi: 10.1111/jre.12211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Silva LM, et al. Fibrin is a critical regulator of neutrophil effector function at the oral mucosal barrier. Science. 2021;374:eabl5450. doi: 10.1126/science.abl5450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kim, T. S. et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps and extracellular histones potentiate IL-17 inflammation in periodontitis. J. Exp. Med. 220, e20221751 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 41.Assuma R, Oates T, Cochran D, Amar S, Graves DT. IL-1 and TNF antagonists inhibit the inflammatory response and bone loss in experimental periodontitis. J. Immunol. 1998;160:403–409. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.160.1.403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hajishengallis G, Lamont RJ, Graves DT. The enduring importance of animal models in understanding periodontal disease. Virulence. 2015;6:229–235. doi: 10.4161/21505594.2014.990806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fan, Y. et al. Creating an atlas of the bone microenvironment during oral inflammatory-related bone disease using single-cell profiling. Elife12, e82537 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 44.Cai B, et al. N2-polarized neutrophils guide bone mesenchymal stem cell recruitment and initiate bone regeneration: a missing piece of the bone regeneration puzzle. Adv. Sci. 2021;8:e2100584. doi: 10.1002/advs.202100584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Moutsopoulos NM, et al. Defective neutrophil recruitment in leukocyte adhesion deficiency type I disease causes local IL-17-driven inflammatory bone loss. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014;6:229ra40. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Moutsopoulos NM, et al. Interleukin-12 and Interleukin-23 blockade in leukocyte adhesion deficiency type 1. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;376:1141–1146. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1612197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.West NR, Owens BMJ, Hegazy AN. The oncostatin M-stromal cell axis in health and disease. Scand. J. Immunol. 2018;88:e12694. doi: 10.1111/sji.12694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Boniface K, et al. Oncostatin M secreted by skin infiltrating T lymphocytes is a potent keratinocyte activator involved in skin inflammation. J. Immunol. 2007;178:4615–4622. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.7.4615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Okamoto H, et al. The synovial expression and serum levels of interleukin-6, interleukin-11, leukemia inhibitory factor, and oncostatin M in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40:1096–1105. doi: 10.1002/art.1780400614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lin W, et al. Mapping the immune microenvironment for mandibular alveolar bone homeostasis at single-cell resolution. Bone Res. 2021;9:17. doi: 10.1038/s41413-021-00141-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Torossian, F. et al. Macrophage-derived oncostatin M contributes to human and mouse neurogenic heterotopic ossifications. JCI Insight2, e96034 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 52.West NR, et al. Oncostatin M drives intestinal inflammation and predicts response to tumor necrosis factor-neutralizing therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Med. 2017;23:579–589. doi: 10.1038/nm.4307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Friedrich M, et al. IL-1-driven stromal-neutrophil interactions define a subset of patients with inflammatory bowel disease that does not respond to therapies. Nat. Med. 2021;27:1970–1981. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01520-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Lin S-J, Chen Y-L, Kuo MY-B, Li C-L, Lu H-K. Measurement of gp130 cytokines oncostatin M and IL-6 in gingival crevicular fluid of patients with chronic periodontitis. Cytokine. 2005;30:160–167. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2004.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Okamoto K, et al. Osteoimmunology: the conceptual framework unifying the immune and skeletal systems. Physiol. Rev. 2017;97:1295–1349. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00036.2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kim S, Yamazaki M, Shevde NK, Pike JW. Transcriptional control of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand by the protein kinase A activator forskolin and the transmembrane glycoprotein 130-activating cytokine, oncostatin M, is exerted through multiple distal enhancers. Mol. Endocrinol. 2007;21:197–214. doi: 10.1210/me.2006-0315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Meyer MB, Benkusky NA, Lee C-H, Pike JW. Genomic determinants of gene regulation by 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 during osteoblast-lineage cell differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:19539–19554. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.578104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yan M, et al. Identification of an intronic enhancer regulating RANKL expression in osteocytic cells. Bone Res. 2023;11:43. doi: 10.1038/s41413-023-00277-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yan M, et al. ETS1 governs pathological tissue-remodeling programs in disease-associated fibroblasts. Nat. Immunol. 2022;23:1330–1341. doi: 10.1038/s41590-022-01285-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Onal M, St John HC, Danielson AL, Pike JW. Deletion of the distal Tnfsf11 RL-D2 enhancer that contributes to PTH-Mediated RANKL expression in osteoblast lineage cells results in a high bone mass phenotype in mice. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2016;31:416–429. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zhou Y, et al. RANKL+ senescent cells under mechanical stress: a therapeutic target for orthodontic root resorption using senolytics. Int. J. Oral. Sci. 2023;15:20. doi: 10.1038/s41368-023-00228-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wang Q, et al. Single-cell transcriptomic atlas of gingival mucosa in type 2 diabetes. J. Dent. Res. 2022;101:1654–1664. doi: 10.1177/00220345221092752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.O’Brien CA. Control of RANKL gene expression. Bone. 2010;46:911–919. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.08.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Tsukasaki M, Takayanagi H. Osteoclast biology in the single-cell era. Inflamm. Regen. 2022;42:27. doi: 10.1186/s41232-022-00213-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Armingol E, Officer A, Harismendy O, Lewis NE. Deciphering cell-cell interactions and communication from gene expression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2021;22:71–88. doi: 10.1038/s41576-020-00292-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Robinson JT, et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011;29:24–26. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Castro-Mondragon JA, et al. JASPAR 2022: the 9th release of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:D165–D173. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Grant CE, Bailey TL, Noble WS. FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:1017–1018. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure 1 (3.1MB, pdf)
Supplementary Figure 2 (1.1MB, pdf)
Supplementary Figure 3 (4.5MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All data that support the plots within this paper are available in the main text. The referenced publicly available datasets were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (scRNA-seq data of human periodontal lesions; GSE164241, the epigenomic datasets of osteogenic cell epigenomic datasets; GSE51515, GSE54782, and GSM733779) and ENCODE Project databases (DNase-seq data of human PDL fibroblasts; ENCDO247AAA). The processed files of scRNA-seq data for mouse periodontitis are deposited in the GEO under accession GSE254766.


Articles from International Journal of Oral Science are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES