Toothache is a frequent cause of emergency department visits for dental complaints (Lewis et al. 2015). Because emergency departments are not equipped to provide definitive dental care, analgesic medications, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen combined with opioids, and topical local anesthetics, are frequently prescribed. However, most clinical trials for acute dental pain have been performed in patients undergoing third molar extraction, as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) considers dental impaction pain a pivotal surgical model for drugs to receive approval for acute pain (Hersh et al. 2020). In contrast, fewer studies have been performed in patients presenting with spontaneous toothache pain, and several logistical challenges are present compared to postoperative dental pain studies: patients with spontaneous toothache pain cannot be scheduled in advance, toothache patients are often at the very highest end of pain intensity at presentation, and the length of the observation period is limited due to the necessity that definitive dental care (endodontic therapy or exodontia) be performed that day. Consequently, the only placebo-controlled trials in toothache pain patients performed to date have studied the safety and efficacy of topical benzocaine (Hersh et al. 2005, 2013). While recently published guidelines for the treatment of acute dental pain recommend ibuprofen (alone or in combination with acetaminophen) and naproxen sodium as first-line drugs, the conclusions for toothache pain for systemic analgesics were all extrapolated from impacted third molar surgery pain data (Carrasco-Labra et al. 2023). In this issue of the Journal of Dental Research, Chrepa et al. (2023) report the results of a phase 2A study investigating the analgesic effects of cannabidiol (CBD) in toothache pain. This study represents the first placebo-controlled trial of a systemic analgesic in toothache pain and is an important proof of concept for a novel pain management strategy in this patient population.
Interestingly, Chrepa et al. (2023) reported a relatively large placebo response, with 25% to 50% of patients reporting pain reduction at various data collection time points. This is consistent with our own observations with topical 20% benzocaine, where the polyethylene glycol vehicle produced a response rate of 47% and benzocaine a response rate of 87% (Hersh et al. 2005). In contrast, placebo response rates in dental impaction studies are typically only 15% to 25% (Hersh et al. 2004; Theken et al. 2019). The “on-and-off” nature of toothache pain in many patients may partially explain this difference.
Although CBD decreased baseline pain within 15 to 30 min, the onset of effect compared to the placebo solution was slow, as the pain scores in the CBD-treated patients did not significantly differ from placebo until 90 to 120 min after administration. Topical 20% benzocaine, compared to its polyethylene glycol vehicle, has an onset to effect of 5 min but a duration of activity of only 30 min (Hersh et al. 2013). However, when compared to baseline pain, its duration of action is at least 2 h (Hersh et al. 2005). We expect based on impacted third molar surgery studies that rapid-release formulations of ibuprofen 400 mg would have an onset within 30 min and a duration of action of at least 4 to 6 h (Hersh et al. 2000; Theken et al. 2019). However, this assumption should be confirmed in placebo-controlled trials of toothache patients. Comparative studies are warranted to establish the place in therapy for each of these analgesic options.
Epidiolex, the formulation of CBD employed in the current study, is an FDA-approved prescription drug indicated for the treatment of seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, Dravet syndrome, or tuberous sclerosis complex in patients 1 y of age and older (US Food and Drug Administration 2018). It is pharmaceutical-grade CBD that has been extensively tested for efficacy, safety, and purity in patients with these rare seizure disorders (Hess et al. 2016; Devinsky et al. 2018; Miller et al. 2020). This is in contrast to the numerous CBD products available over-the-counter for which clinical research is sparse, claims are not closely scrutinized by the FDA, and product purity is often not accurately labeled (Miller et al. 2022; Spindle et al. 2022). Currently, Epidiolex is dispensed only by specialty pharmacies, so widespread use would be limited by availability as well as cost (>$1,000 for 3–7 doses). The use of Epidiolex to treat toothache pain in clinical practice would be considered “off-label use” because it is not approved to treat acute pain. While not prohibited by law, there should be a body of evidence that supports its use in the condition for which it is being prescribed (Verhagen et al. 2008). The data presented by Chrepa et al. (2023) suggest that CBD is efficacious for the treatment of toothache pain. However, a recent meta-analysis reported that CBD is ineffective in a variety of pain conditions (Moore et al. 2023). Thus, additional studies are necessary to establish whether CBD is a viable alternative analgesic for patients with toothache pain.
If further studies demonstrate efficacy, CBD could be used for relief of toothache pain as a “temporary bridge” until definitive dental care. However, even short-term use presents risks of adverse events and drug interactions. As demonstrated in the current publication, sedation, abdominal pain, and diarrhea do occur even with single-dose exposure, and patients must be counseled about the likelihood of these events. According to the package insert, the drug can raise liver enzymes and increase the risk of suicidal ideation (US Food and Drug Administration 2018). Thus, patients with preexisting liver dysfunction or a history of depression are poor candidates for CBD. CBD is an inhibitor of CYP1A2 and CYP2C9 with the potential to increase blood levels and associated toxicities of substrate drugs such as theophylline (arrhythmias and seizures), benzodiazepines (sedation and memory disturbances), and warfarin (bleeding) (US Food and Drug Administration 2018).
In conclusion, Chrepa et al. (2023) present promising results supporting a novel analgesic strategy for toothache pain. We look forward to future studies of CBD in acute dental pain seeking to establish efficacy and define its place in therapy.
Author Contributions
K.N. Theken, E.V. Hersh, contributed to conception, design, data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation, drafted and critically revised the manuscript. All authors gave final approval and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Footnotes
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding: The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
ORCID iDs: K.N. Theken https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9918-9170
E.V. Hersh https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3191-1371
References
- Carrasco-Labra A, Polk DE, Urquhart O, Aghaloo T, Claytor JW, Jr, Dhar V, Dionne RA, Espinoza L, Gordon SM, Hersh EV, et al. 2023. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the pharmacologic management of acute dental pain in children: a report from the American Dental Association Science and Research Institute, the University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine, and the Center for Integrative Global Oral Health at the University of Pennsylvania. J Am Dent Assoc. 154(9):814–825.e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chrepa V, Villasenor S, Mauney A, Kotsakis G, Macpherson L. 2023. Cannabidiol as an alternative analgesic for acute dental pain. J Dent Res [epub ahead of print 1 Nov 2023]. doi: 10.1177/00220345231200814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Devinsky O, Patel AD, Cross JH, Villanueva V, Wirrell EC, Privitera M, Greenwood SM, Roberts C, Checketts D, VanLandingham KE, et al. 2018. Effect of cannabidiol on drop seizures in the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. N Engl J Med. 378(20):1888–1897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hersh EV, Ciancio SG, Kuperstein AS, Stoopler ET, Moore PA, Boynes SG, Levine SC, Casamassimo P, Leyva R, Mathew T, et al. 2013. An evaluation of 10 percent and 20 percent benzocaine gels in patients with acute toothaches: efficacy, tolerability and compliance with label dose administration directions. J Am Dent Assoc. 144(5):517–526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hersh EV, Levin LM, Adamson D, Christensen S, Kiersch TA, Noveck R, Watson G, 2nd, Lyon JA. 2004. Dose-ranging analgesic study of Prosorb diclofenac potassium in postsurgical dental pain. Clin Ther. 26(8):1215–1227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hersh EV, Levin LM, Cooper SA, Doyle G, Waksman J, Wedell D, Hong D, Secreto SA. 2000. Ibuprofen liquigel for oral surgery pain. Clin Ther. 22(11):1306–1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hersh EV, Moore PA, Grosser T, Polomano RC, Farrar JT, Saraghi M, Juska SA, Mitchell CH, Theken KN. 2020. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids in postsurgical dental pain. J Dent Res. 99(7):777–786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hersh EV, Stoopler ET, Secreto SA, DeRossi SS. 2005. A study of benzocaine gel dosing for toothache. J Clin Dent. 16(4):103–108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hess EJ, Moody KA, Geffrey AL, Pollack SF, Skirvin LA, Bruno PL, Paolini JL, Thiele EA. 2016. Cannabidiol as a new treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy in tuberous sclerosis complex. Epilepsia. 57(10):1617–1624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewis CW, McKinney CM, Lee HH, Melbye ML, Rue TC. 2015. Visits to us emergency departments by 20- to 29-year-olds with toothache during 2001-2010. J Am Dent Assoc. 146(5):295–302.e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller I, Scheffer IE, Gunning B, Sanchez-Carpintero R, Gil-Nagel A, Perry MS, Saneto RP, Checketts D, Dunayevich E, Knappertz V, et al. 2020. Dose-ranging effect of adjunctive oral cannabidiol vs placebo on convulsive seizure frequency in Dravet syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 77(5):613–621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller OS, Elder EJ, Jr, Jones KJ, Gidal BE. 2022. Analysis of cannabidiol (CBD) and THC in nonprescription consumer products: implications for patients and practitioners. Epilepsy Behav. 127:108514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moore A, Straube S, Fisher E, Eccleston C. 2023. Cannabidiol (CBD) products for pain: ineffective, expensive, and with potential harms. J Pain [epub ahead of print 18 Oct 2023]. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.10.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spindle TR, Sholler DJ, Cone EJ, Murphy TP, ElSohly M, Winecker RE, Flegel RR, Bonn-Miller MO, Vandrey R. 2022. Cannabinoid content and label accuracy of hemp-derived topical products available online and at national retail stores. JAMA Netw Open. 5(7):e2223019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Theken KN, Hersh EV, Lahens NF, Lee HM, Li X, Granquist EJ, Giannakopoulos HE, Levin LM, Secreto SA, Grant GR, et al. 2019. Variability in the analgesic response to ibuprofen is associated with cyclooxygenase activation in inflammatory pain. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 106(3):632–641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- US Food and Drug Administration. 2018. Epidiolex® (cannabidiol) oral solution [accessed 2023 Sep 19]. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/210365s015lbl.pdf
- Verhagen CC, Niezink AG, Engels YY, Hekster YY, Doornebal JJ, Vissers KC. 2008. Off-label use of drugs in pain medicine and palliative care: an algorithm for the assessment of its safe and legal prescription. Pain Pract. 8(3):157–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]