ABSTRACT
The bacteria within supragingival biofilms participate in complex exchanges with other microbes inhabiting the same niche. One example is the mutans group streptococci (Streptococcus mutans), implicated in the development of tooth decay, and other health-associated commensal streptococci species. Previously, our group transcriptomically characterized intermicrobial interactions between S. mutans and several species of oral bacteria. However, these experiments were carried out in a medium without human saliva. To better mimic their natural environment, we first evaluated how inclusion of saliva affected growth and biofilm formation of eight Streptococcus species individually and found saliva to positively benefit growth rates while negatively influencing biofilm biomass accumulation and altering spatial arrangement. These results carried over during evaluation of 29 saliva-derived isolates of various species. Surprisingly, we also found that addition of saliva increased the competitive behaviors of S. mutans in coculture competitions against commensal streptococci that led to increases in biofilm microcolony volumes. Through transcriptomically characterizing mono- and cocultures of S. mutans and Streptococcus oralis with and without saliva, we determined that each species developed a nutritional niche under mixed-species growth, with S. mutans upregulating carbohydrate uptake and utilization pathways while S. oralis upregulated genome features related to peptide uptake and glycan foraging. S. mutans also upregulated genes involved in oxidative stress tolerance, particularly manganese uptake, which we could artificially manipulate by supplementing in manganese leading to an advantage over its opponent. Our report highlights observable changes in microbial behaviors through leveraging environmental- and host-supplied resources over their competitors.
IMPORTANCE
Dental caries (tooth decay) is the most prevalent disease for both children and adults nationwide. Caries are initiated from demineralization of the enamel due to organic acid production through the metabolic activity of oral bacteria growing in biofilm communities attached to the tooth’s surface. Mutans group streptococci are closely associated with caries development and initiation of the cariogenic cycle, which decreases the amount of acid-sensitive, health-associated commensal bacteria while selecting for aciduric and acidogenic species that then further drives the disease process. Defining the exchanges that occur between mutans group streptococci and oral commensals in a condition that closely mimics their natural environment is of critical need toward identifying factors that can influence odontopathogen establishment, persistence, and outgrowth. The goal of our research is to develop strategies, potentially through manipulation of microbial interactions characterized here, that prevent the emergence of mutans group streptococci while keeping the protective flora intact.
KEYWORDS: intermicrobial interactions, biofilms, oral biology, microbial competition, human fluids, Streptococcus
INTRODUCTION
The bacteria that colonize the oral cavity live in complex communities within biofilms attached to the tooth’s surface. An array of complex intermicrobial interactions is present, with specific interactions developing to be synergistic, antagonistic, or neutral between species (1, 2). One well-studied antagonistic interaction occurs between mutans group streptococci and oral commensal streptococci (3, 4). Mutans group streptococci form microcolony structures that are encased and held structurally sound by glucan polysaccharides they abundantly produce (5–7). These species are also highly acidogenic, producing organic acids that are pooled within their microcolonies from fermentation of dietary carbohydrates, causing localized areas of acidic pH that demineralize the tooth’s enamel (8, 9). Oral commensal streptococci are commonly acid sensitive and encode various defense mechanisms, such as hydrogen peroxide production (10, 11) and arginine metabolism via the arginine deiminase (ADS) pathway (12, 13) to combat the outgrowth of the mutans group streptococci as well as to buffer against glycolytic acids. One favorable strategy toward tooth decay (dental caries) prevention is thwarting the emergence of mutans group streptococci within the oral microbiome while keeping the normal, protective microbiota intact. Development of new therapeutic approaches relies on fully characterizing these exchanges between competing microbes and unraveling the strategies employed by each species that leads to a gain in competitive advantage over the other.
Our group recently transcriptomically characterized coculture growth between S. mutans and several species of commensal streptococci (14). However, these experiments were carried out in our lab-based experimental medium, tryptone and yeast extract (TY-). In vivo, supragingival biofilms are constantly bathed in saliva. Resting human saliva contains organic and inorganic ions, peptides, and over 400 different host-derived proteins, many of which are glycosylated (15, 16). Individual free amino acids are present at concentrations less than 12 mg L−1 and the preferred carbohydrate glucose at a concentration less than 100 µM (17, 18). During periods of host fasting, oral microbes must obtain carbon, nitrogen, and energy from sources such as glycoproteins, requiring an assortment of enzymes that release oligosaccharides, peptides, and amino acids. These include several different classes of glycosidases and peptidases that are abundant throughout the genomes of oral bacteria but are often distributed between different species that leads to a consortium of different strains required to cooperatively degrade and liberate carbohydrate and peptide/amino acid moieties (19–21). For example, the glycan foraging activities of Streptococcus oralis are sufficient to digest the N-linked glycans of plasma human α1-acid glycoprotein (22) yet lack several glycoside hydrolases encoded by Streptococcus mitis and peptidases of Streptococcus gordonii to degrade proline-rich proteins (PRPs) (21, 23). Of note, the genome of the caries pathogen Streptococcus mutans does not contain many, if any glycoside hydrolases, and lacks PRP degradation activity (21, 23).
To understand whether competitive behaviors are altered by culturing these species within a medium that more closely mimics their natural environment, we evaluated cocultures of S. mutans and S. oralis in a TY-human saliva mix that was optimally chosen based on our initial characterization of individual oral streptococci growth in media mixes containing saliva. Our results show that inclusion of saliva enhances the competition of S. mutans against commensal streptococci, with each species segregating into their own nutritional niche.
RESULTS
Growth of oral streptococci are enhanced with human saliva
To examine how the growth of oral streptococci is altered in saliva, we first tested whether eight different strains could grow in only saliva and/or saliva supplemented with glucose (Fig. S1). None of the eight strains had measurable growth in saliva alone, while each strain, except for Streptococcus sp. A12, displayed low to moderate growth in the saliva containing glucose.
An alternative strategy was chosen to mix our lab-based experimental medium, tryptone and yeast extract (TY-), half and half with either water (TY-Water, control) or saliva (TY-Saliva), and observe the growth of the same eight-species panel (Fig. 1A through H). The same amount of carbohydrate (20 mM glucose) was added into each medium. With this methodology, six of the eight strains had final yields at or even higher than TY-, and all eight had yields greater than optical density at 600 nm (OD600 nm) of 0.4 in medium containing saliva. Additionally, five of the eight strains showed improved growth in the TY-Saliva condition through either faster doubling times and/or shorter lag times.
Fig 1.
Growth of oral streptococci in human saliva. Growth curves of oral streptococci species (A) S. sp. A12, (B) S. cristatus ATCC 51100, (C) S. gordonii DL1, (D) S. mitis ATCC 49456, (E) S. mutans UA159, (F) S. oralis 34, (G) S. sanguinis SK36, and (H) S. sobrinus 6715 in either 100% TY (TY-; light grey circles), 50% TY / 50% H2O (TY-Water; blue squares), or 50% TY / 50% human saliva (TY-Saliva; red hexagons). Data points for optical density at 600 nm recorded every hour over a 24-h period are shown. Growth characteristic heat maps of the eight different oral streptococci with varying percentages (0%–100%) of human saliva mixed with TY. Characteristics shown include (I) doubling times (minutes), (J) final yield (OD600 nm), and (K) time to OD600 nm ≥ 0.1 (hours). Dark-blue denotes lower values while green-yellow denotes the highest values within each heat map. White boxes crossed out without values indicate no growth in that condition.
We next wanted to determine the optimal amount of saliva to mix with TY- for the remainder of our experiments by recording doubling times, final yields, and lag times (Fig. 1I through K). Each strain saw improvements in at least one of these categories with 25%–75% saliva mixed in TY-. However, growth was impaired for some strains starting at 75% saliva and all strains with 90% saliva. Therefore, it was determined that a 50% TY-, 50% saliva mix would be used for all experiments going forward.
To ensure these measured growth enhancements with saliva were not TY- specific, we performed a similar set of growth assays in the chemically defined medium (CDM) (24–26) (Fig. S2). Here, all eight streptococci species displayed growth improvements over CDM alone with both S. mitis and S. oralis only growing in the CDM-Saliva condition. These data demonstrate that the growth of several oral streptococci species are improved in medias containing human saliva.
Biofilm architecture is modified with human saliva
Previous studies have shown that salivary mucins can reduce oral streptococci biofilm formation (27, 28). To determine if similar reductions occur with saliva, we first compared the 24-h accumulated biomass using a crystal violet assay (Fig. 2A and B). All seven species, except for Streptococcus sobrinus, had similar or lower quantifiable biomass with the addition of saliva. Interestingly, S. sobrinus nearly doubled its accumulated biomass in TY- containing saliva.
Fig 2.
Biofilm formation of oral streptococci in human saliva. (A) Representative image of a crystal violet (CV) biofilm biomass assay for eight different oral streptococci species (listed on y-axis) in TY-, TY-Water, or TY-Saliva. (B) Fold change in CV biomass in TY-Water (blue circles) or TY-Saliva (red squares) normalized to TY- only. Data were quantified from the image shown on the left by extracting the crystal violet with 30% acetic acid and measuring the absorbance at 575 nm. (C) Merged representative maximum intensity 20× Z-projections of 24-h oral streptococci biofilms grown in either TY- (top), TY-Water (middle), or TY-Saliva (bottom). Bacterial cells were stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue), eDNA probed with labeled antibodies (yellow), and glucans visualized with labeled dextran (red). Scale bar (100 µm) is shown in top-left image. (D) Quantified cell, (E) eDNA, and (F) glucan biomass (µm3/µm2) along with (G) biofilm thickness (µm) and (H) individual microcolony volume from the image set shown in panel C between TY- (light-gray circles), TY-Water (dark-gray squares), or TY-Saliva (colored hexagons). Bars represent the mean of biomass or thickness from five independent images acquired (n = 5) with standard deviation. S. sp. A12 and S. mitis were not included within this panel, as they do not form adherent biofilms in monoculture. Quantification was completed using Gen5 Image+ software. Data graphing and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with multiple comparisons were completed in GraphPad Prism software. * P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001.
To better understand compositional and structural changes that may be occurring, we imaged and quantified single-species biofilms in our three different growth media (Fig. 2C through H). We observed a significant reduction in S. gordonii, S. oralis, and Streptococcus sanguinis cell biomass along with a decline in Streptococcus cristatus, S. oralis, and S. sanguinis eDNA biomass in TY-Saliva compared with TY-. However, for S. sobrinus, a significant increase in cell, eDNA, and glucan biomass was recorded. Overall, human saliva alters biofilm accumulation and architecture of oral streptococci species while enhancing biofilm formation of an odontopathogen (S. sobrinus).
Similar changes in growth and biofilm formation with saliva-derived bacterial isolates
To verify that documented changes were not limited to lab-adapted strains, we first isolated 29 different bacterial colonies that grew on Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) agar plates from our commercially sourced saliva. Viable colonies were streaked for isolation and then species identified by 16S sequencing. Identities returned included a range of different Streptococcus, Actinomyces, Rothia, and Granulicatella species. We then monitored the growth of each isolate. Doubling times for 26 out of 29 isolates were quickest in the TY-Saliva condition, and 18 out of 29 recorded their highest final yields as well (Fig. 3A and B). Of note, two Actinomyces oris isolates (SOSUI_020 and SOSUI_026) and a S. mitis isolate (SOUSI_012) struggled to grow in either of the TY- and TY-Water conditions but grew well in medium that contained saliva. To measure potential changes in biofilm formation, we first screened 17 of the isolates (SOSUI_001 – SOSUI_018, and SOSUI_003 failed to grow after isolation and were excluded from all experiments) for measurable biomass accumulation (Fig. S3). Four isolates, SOSUI_001, SOSUI_011, SOSUI_016, and SOSUI_018, were selected to carry forward for further analysis (each isolate also represented a different genus). Three of the four isolates saw significant reductions in biomass accumulation in TY-Saliva compared with TY- while the fourth, SOSUI_16, saw a non-significant 75% ± 1% reduction (Fig. 3C). Similar patterns of reduction in both cell biomass and biofilm matrix components could be visualized by microscopy (Fig. 3D and E). These data suggest that observations made with lab-adapted oral streptococci species are similar to phenotypes displayed by low-passage saliva-derived isolates including non-Streptococcus species.
Fig 3.
Growth and biofilm formation of human saliva-derived bacterial isolates. Growth characteristic heat maps of (A) doubling times (minutes) and (B) final yield (OD600 nm) shown for 29 different human saliva-derived bacterial isolates. Their SOSUI identifier #, along with species identity, is shown on the left y-axis. Dark-blue denotes lower values while green-yellow denotes the highest values within each heat map. White boxes crossed out without values indicate no growth in that condition. (C) CV biomass (absorbance at 575 nm) of SOSUI_001, _011, _016, and _018 in TY- (light-gray circles), TY-Water (dark-gray squares), or TY-Saliva (purple hexagons). n = 4. (D) Merged representative maximum intensity 40× Z-projections of 24-h saliva isolate biofilms grown in either TY- (top), TY-Water (middle), or TY-Saliva (bottom). Bacterial cells were stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue), eDNA probed with labeled antibodies (yellow), and glucans visualized with labeled dextran (red). Scale bar (100 µm) is shown in top-left image. (E) Quantified cell biomass (µm3/µm2) from the image set shown in panel D between TY- (light-gray circles), TY-Water (dark-gray squares), or TY-Saliva (colored hexagons). n = 5. Quantification was completed using Gen5 Image+ software. Data graphing and two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons were completed in GraphPad Prism software with resulting P values displayed.
Saliva enhances the competitive behaviors of S. mutans
Previous studies reported that salivary mucins can alter the competitive behaviors between Streptococcus mutans and commensal streptococci (29). We performed a fluorescent intensity-based coculture competition assay between a chromosomally integrated, constitutively expressing S. mutans gfp strain (30) and unmarked competitor species (Fig. 4A through C). Specific growth of S. mutans could be tracked via fluorescent intensity measurements of green fluorescent protein (GFP) every half hour over a 24-h period, while the optical density of the entire coculture was also recorded. An area under the curve (AUC) was calculated using the intensity measurements. A significant increase in S. mutans intensity was recorded in cocultures with S. oralis and S. sanguinis but not with S. gordonii within the TY-Saliva condition. To verify that the fluorescent intensity-based competition led to quantifiable changes in recoverable cell number, we set up a competitive index assay between S. mutans and the three commensal strains that enumerated colony-forming units (CFUs) during inoculation (ti = 0 h) and at the time of cell harvest (tf = 24 h) (Fig. 4D through F). The competitive index assay showed similar results to the fluorescent intensity-based assay, with S. mutans displaying a higher competitive index in TY-Saliva compared with TY- with S. oralis and S. sanguinis, but no change with S. gordonii. We also used the fluorescent intensity-based competition with other competitors and found higher S. mutans intensities in TY-Saliva with S. sp. A12, S. cristatus, and S. sobrinus, but not with S. mitis (Fig. S4). S. mutans additionally displayed increased intensity within cocultures using CDM-, ensuring this change was not specific for TY- (Fig. S5).
Fig 4.
Competition assays between S. mutans and commensal streptococci competitors. Fluorescence-based [intensity, arbitrary units (a.u.), left y-axis] growth profile of S. mutans in coculture competition against (A) S. gordonii DL1, (B) S. oralis 34, and (C) S. sanguinis SK36 in either TY- (light-gray circles), TY-Water (blue squares), or TY-Saliva (red hexagons). Growth of the entire coculture, measured by optical density at 600 nm, is shown in black outline using the same symbol (right y-axis). The AUC of the fluorescent intensity of each condition was quantified and is shown in the graph on the right (n = 4). Violin plot of Log10 competitive index of S. mutans in coculture competition against (D) S. gordonii DL1, (E) S. oralis 34, and (F) S. sanguinis SK36 in either TY- (light-gray circles), TY-Water (blue squares), or TY-Saliva (red hexagons). Positive values represent a competitive advantage for S. mutans while negative values represent a competitive advantage for the commensal strain. Black solid lines represent the quartiles while a gold dashed line represents the median. n = 4. Data graphing and one-way or two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons were completed in GraphPad Prism software. * P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001.
For additional validation, we also examined 24 coculture biofilms and found significantly higher quantified S. mutans biomass with S. oralis and S. sanguinis that increased overall biofilm thickness (Fig. 5). Together, these data indicate that human saliva can enhance the competitive behaviors of S. mutans during growth with some commensal species.
Fig 5.
Increased biomass of S. mutans within human saliva. (A) Merged representative maximum intensity 40× Z-projections of 24-h cocultured biofilms between a S. mutans GFP+ strain (green) and oral commensal competitors (stained with Hoechst 33342, blue). Biofilm matrix component eDNA was probed with labeled antibodies (yellow) and glucans visualized with labeled dextran (red). (B) Quantified S. mutans biomass (µm3/µm2), (C) biofilm thickness (µm), (D) eDNA, and (E) glucan biomass from the image set shown in panel B between TY- (light-gray circles), TY-Water (dark-gray squares), and TY-Saliva (colored hexagons). Bars represent the mean of biomass or thickness from five independent images acquired (n = 5) with standard deviation. Quantification was completed using Gen5 Image+ software. Data graphing and one-way or two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons were completed in GraphPad Prism software. * P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001.
Human saliva reprograms the transcriptome of oral streptococci
To understand how saliva affects changes in growth, biofilm formation, and competition between the oral streptococci, we performed RNA-Seq on monocultures of S. mutans and S. oralis in TY-Saliva and compared with TY- (Fig. 6). We found 133 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in S. mutans grown in saliva (Table S1), with the most upregulated genes (59 total DEGs) belonging to phosphotransferase systems (PTS) specific for fructose, mannose and/or N-acetyl glucosamine (GlcNAc) (levDEFGX, SMU.1956c – SMU.1961c) (31–33), cellobiose (SMU.1596 – SMU.1600) (34), and α−1,3-linked carbohydrates (SMU.100 – SMU.105) (35). Other upregulated genes of note included the glucosyltransferases gtfBC (SMU.1004, SMU.1005), the bacitracin resistance ABC transporters mbrAB (SMU.1006-SMU.1007) (36), and the TnSmu2 gene cluster which contains genes for mutanobactin synthesis (37). In contrast, many of the downregulated genes (74 DEGs) belonged to the integrative and conjugative element TnSmu1 (38, 39), the genetic competence regulon (40), a CRISPR2-Cas system (41, 42), and predicted amino acid ABC transporters (SMU.932–SMU.936). Interestingly, the most downregulated genes within the data set belonged to the trehalose-specific PTS (43, 44). The commensal S. oralis had a higher number of DEGs overall (206 total, 11% of coding genome features) (Table S2), consisting of upregulation (148 DEGs) in 18 different ABC transporters, 13 transcriptional regulators, 7 glycosyl hydrolases, and genes involved in de novo purine and tryptophan biosynthesis. Downregulated genes (58 DEGs) included queuosine biosynthesis (45), transporters for iron (46), vitamin B12 (47), and glutamine (48) and transcriptional regulators ciaR (49) and mntR (50). These described DEGs highlight the alternations in metabolic networks for oral streptococci during growth in saliva.
Fig 6.
Transcriptome profiling of S. mutans and S. oralis monocultures in human saliva. (A) Principal component analysis (PCA) from RNA-Seq expression data (n = 3) of S. mutans monocultures grown in TY- (black circles) or TY-Saliva (red hexagons). The proportion of variance for either PC1 (x-axis) or PC2 (y-axis) is listed. (B) Volcano plot of changes within individual S. mutans genes (circles) between TY- and TY-Saliva. Differentially expressed genes (genes with >4 Log10 P value and Log2 fold change > (−)1) are shown in either red (upregulated, right) or blue (downregulated, left). Individual gene identifier, name, and/or characterized function are displayed, if able. (C) Stacked bar chart of upregulated S. mutans DEGs grouped by pathway/operon/function. (D) Stacked bar chart of downregulated S. mutans DEGs. (E) PCA from RNA-Seq expression data of S. oralis monocultures (n = 3). (F) Volcano plot of changes within individual S. oralis genes. (G) Stacked bar chart of upregulated S. oralis DEGs. (H) Stacked bar chart of downregulated S. oralis DEGs. DEGs were determined from Degust using edgeR analysis. Data graphing and PCA calculations were completed in GraphPad Prism software.
We also compared DEGs of both S. mutans and S. oralis grown in coculture TY-Saliva to coculture TY- (Fig. 7). By already characterizing monocultures in saliva, we were able to categorize DEGs that overlapped with monoculture growth as well as isolate new features that were specific only to the coculture interaction. For S. mutans, this included upregulation of transporters related to manganese (slo operon and mntH) (51), maltose (malXFGK) (52), glutamine and glutathione uptake (SMU.1939c-SMU.1942c) (53), and the rhamnose-glucose cell wall polysaccharide (rgp) operon (54, 55) (Table S3). Additionally, the trehalose-specific PTS, the most downregulated genes in monoculture, were now upregulated twofold in coculture.
Fig 7.
Transcriptome profiling of S. mutans and S. oralis cocultures in human saliva. (A) PCA from RNA-Seq expression data (n = 3) of S. mutans cocultures with S. oralis grown in TY- (black circles) or TY-Saliva (red hexagons). The proportion of variance for either PC1 (x-axis) or PC2 (y-axis) is listed. (B) Stacked bar chart of S. mutans upregulated (red, positive) and downregulated (blue, negative) DEGs grouped by pathway/operon/function. (C) Venn diagram of the number of S. mutans DEGs in coculture with S. oralis specific to TY- (light-gray), TY-Saliva (red), or common to both conditions (overlap). (D) PCA from RNA-Seq expression data of S. oralis cocultures with S. mutans (n = 3). (E) Stacked bar chart of S. oralis upregulated and downregulated DEGs. (F) Venn diagram of the number of S. oralis DEGs in coculture with S. mutans specific to each condition.
Recently, our group highlighted a repetitive DEG pattern for S. mutans during coculture growth compared with monoculture, including with S. oralis (14). To determine how saliva modified this pattern, we compared S. mutans DEGs during transition from monoculture to coculture growth with S. oralis in either TY- or TY-Saliva (i.e., DEGs from coculture in TY- vs DEGs from coculture in TY-Saliva). Of the 219 total S. mutans DEGs captured during coculture growth with S. oralis in both media conditions, 78 were specific to TY-, 108 were specific to TY-Saliva, and 33 were present under both conditions (Table S4). These 33 genome features consisted of the CRISPR2-Cas system, levDEFGX, the transglycosylase SMU.2146c, the LexA-like transcriptional regulator hdiR (SMU.2027), and amino acid ABC transporters SMU.932-SMU.936. For S. oralis, only 24 DEGs were specific to the coculture interaction (Table S5). Eleven were upregulated and included genes within the tagatose 6-phosphate pathway, an endo-α-N-acetylgalactosaminidase (56), an N-acetylmannosamine kinase (57) and α-mannosidase, and a thiamin transporter. Downregulated genes included oppA, other amino acid transporters, and the uroporphyrinogen metabolism pathway. For comparison of DEGs during transition from monoculture to coculture, we found only 15 total DEGs with no overlap between conditions (Table S6).
S. mutans growth enhanced with alternative carbohydrates and manganese
A striking feature from our transcriptomic data sets was the set of DEGs in S. mutans carbohydrate uptake and utilization pathways in TY-Saliva that is altered if S. mutans is in monoculture or coculture with S. oralis (Fig. 8A). One hypothesis is that S. mutans and S. oralis could be segregating into different preferred nutritional niches that is enhanced with the inclusion of saliva into the growth medium. To begin to test this hypothesis, we performed a competitive index assay between S. mutans and S. oralis in TY-Saliva that included 10 mM glucose as well as 10 mM of an additional monosaccharide (galactose, fructose, or mannose) or 5 mM of an additional disaccharide (lactose, trehalose, cellobiose, or maltose). Each strain grew similarly in monoculture between the different medias (Fig. S6). However, in coculture, the presence of galactose, mannose, trehalose, and cellobiose increased the competitiveness of S. mutans while inclusion of fructose, lactose, and maltose saw no significant change from growth in glucose alone (Fig. 8B). Similarly to carbohydrates, metal uptake pathways were listed as DEGs in coculture with S. oralis (Fig. 8). Supplementing the media with 1 µM addition of iron (Fe) saw no change in competitive index, but addition of manganese (Mn) benefited S. mutans while zinc (Zn) shifted the balance in favor of S. oralis (Fig. 8D). Together, these data indicate that studying observable changes in DEGs could offer opportunities to further define the interactions that occur between species, while also opening interventional strategies to artificially manipulate interaction outcomes.
Fig 8.
Altering the competitive behaviors of S. mutans with alternative carbohydrate sources or metals. (A) Log2 fold change heat map of S. mutans carbohydrate uptake gene expression changes in TY-Saliva monoculture or coculture with S. oralis 34 in comparison to TY- monoculture growth. Deeper red colors denote upregulation while deeper blue colors denote downregulation. (B) Violin plot of Log10 competitive index of S. mutans in coculture competition against S. oralis 34 in TY-Saliva with 10 mM glucose and 10 (monosaccharides) or 5 (disaccharides) mM of the indicated carbohydrate. Positive values represent a competitive advantage for S. mutans while negative values represent a competitive advantage for S. oralis. Black solid lines represent the quartiles while a gold dashed line represents the median. n = 4. (C) = control. (C) Log2 fold change heat map of S. mutans metal uptake gene expression changes. (D) Violin plot of Log10 competitive index of S. mutans in coculture competition against S. oralis 34 in TY-Saliva with 1 µM addition of the indicated metal (FeSO4, MnSO4, or ZnSO4). Data graphing and one-way or two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons were completed in GraphPad Prism software. * P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001.
DISCUSSION
Our foray into examining the growth and competition of oral streptococci in saliva began with the goal of documenting how the interaction(s) between S. mutans and commensal streptococci are modified in the presence of saliva. We were able to verify prior reports that most streptococcal strains are not able to grow in 100% saliva unless glucose is added as a carbon source (58). Even then, S. gordonii was the only species that achieved growth levels that would have been suitable for our assays, which also follows previous observations (59). Therefore, we used the strategy of mixing our lab-based experimental medium, TY-, with different proportions of saliva. Conveniently, mixing an equal volume of TY- with saliva led to growth benefits for almost all eight species of streptococci tested. Including even just small amounts of saliva led to growth benefits, with S. oralis recording faster doubling times in TY- with as little as 1% saliva added (Fig. S7). One surprise was finding several species that clearly grew better with the addition of saliva such as S. cristatus and S. oralis, with saliva even allowing for growth of S. oralis and S. mitis in CDM. While this experimental protocol does not fully replicate conditions in vivo, it does allow for inclusion of important host-derived factors that can influence the growth of oral bacteria. Other models that take into consideration more factors of the oral environment than our protocol tested here may provide further insights into oral bacteria growth. While we have not yet determined the factor(s) present in saliva that are promoting growth, the displayed phenotypes should provide a clear test to determine their identity. These discoveries could also be translatable to other genera, as similar growth-promoting phenotypes were recorded with saliva-derived isolates of Actinomyces, Rothia, and Granulicatella species. It is important to note that while growth in planktonic phase improved, several species saw reductions in biofilm biomass, potentially from loss of adhesion due to the presence of salivary mucins (27). The role saliva plays during biofilm growth will need to be further explored to fully realize its potential benefits via more advanced methodologies.
Another surprise occurred during coculture competitions between S. mutans and several different commensal species. We initially assumed that since several commensals saw drastic growth improvement in saliva, such as S. oralis, commensals would gain a higher competitive edge. However, S. mutans was more competitive against four out of the six different commensal species we tested, as well as with S. sobrinus that is commonly found together with S. mutans in carious lesions (60–62). A limitation of this study was not testing S. mutans expansion in mixed-species communities that better represents the composition of supragingival biofilms. Due to significant changes in both doubling times and reductions in lag times, our current working hypothesis is that saliva “jump starts” metabolic pathways in several species, including carbohydrate uptake and glycolytic pathways in S. mutans characterized by our transcriptomic data sets (Fig. 9). We were able to capture upregulation of at least three S. mutans PTS operons in saliva, as well as the trehalose PTS and maltose ABC transporters during coculture with S. oralis. We also saw upregulation of fruAB, pyruvate formate-lyase (pfl), and the glycogen synthesis operon (glg), suggesting heterofermentative growth on non-glucose sugars with potential concurrent intracellular polysaccharide (IPS) accumulation. A variety of carbohydrates likely present in saliva is plausibly responsible for these transcriptional changes, even if present in low micromolar amounts. While we did not specifically test for other carbohydrates, we did quantify less than 125 µM glucose present in our saliva preparations, similar to other previously reported values (15, 63). Additionally, we found upregulation of genes responsible for mutanobactin synthesis, a compound described to be important for commensal-produced hydrogen peroxide tolerance (37). Enhanced S. mutans competitiveness may also be due, in part, to increased oxidative stress tolerance supplied by this compound. Another intriguing possibility are quorum-sensing molecules such as AI-2 that could be carried in our donor-provided saliva that upregulates metabolism-related genes when present (64, 65). Of note, genes related to genetic competence and bacteriocin production were downregulated, a similar transcriptional profile for S. mutans cultured with mucin O-linked glycans (66).
Fig 9.
Saliva modifies the competitive behaviors of oral streptococci. Two oral streptococci, S. mutans (green) and S. oralis (blue), colonize supragingival biofilms attached to the tooth’s surface. In cocultures competed in lab-based medium, S. oralis maintains a competitive advantage over S. mutans. However, when saliva is added to the medium, the competitive behaviors of S. mutans are enhanced through upregulation of operons related to carbohydrate uptake and utilization as well as pathways for oxidative stress tolerance. In S. oralis, the presence of saliva leads to enhanced expression of genes related to glycan foraging and amino acid transporters. The figure artwork was created using BioRender.
Our transcriptional data of S. mutans and S. oralis cocultures also hints of each species developing nutritional niches under mixed-species growth. The best example of this involves the lac operon and tagatose 6-phosphate pathway for the metabolism of galactose. During coculture, S. mutans downregulates the genes within this pathway while they are concurrently upregulated in S. oralis. In general, there was no significant overlap in the regulation of orthologous genes between strains during growth in saliva suggesting species-specific responses, with the tagatose pathway being one of the few gene sets common between species. S. mutans also upregulates pathways for trehalose and maltose uptake, two carbohydrates that do not abundantly support the growth of S. oralis (Fig. S8). In turn, we see upregulation of genes in S. oralis related to glycan foraging. Rather than competing for the same non-glucose carbohydrates, it is tempting to speculate that these organisms may be utilizing carbon sources the other species do not. To begin to test this hypothesis, we completed a competitive index assay where providing galactose, mannose, trehalose, and cellobiose in addition to glucose favored S. mutans over S. oralis. Other experiments will be required to further test this hypothesis and potential variability between species. Targeting of transport systems that do not overlap with those found in commensals could provide an attractive strategy toward limiting S. mutans emergence. Likewise, the taxonomic diversity and resistance to dysbiosis of saliva-derived oral communities have recently been shown to be increased with mucin glycans (28), highlighting that these nutritional niche partitionings may be key in maintaining microbiome homeostasis by suppressing outgrowth of pathogens.
A final note was the observation of multiple oxidative stress tolerance pathways upregulated in S. mutans with saliva, especially under the coculture condition. This included upregulation of manganese transporters sloABC and mntH, recently characterized to show cooperative activity in manganese-restricted conditions (51, 67), as well as concurrent downregulation of iron transporters. Manganese can assist in oxidative stress tolerance through acting as a cofactor of superoxide dismutase to neutralize hydroxyl radicals (68), while free iron can produce hydroxyl radicals via Fenton chemistry (69). Additionally, manganese may also stimulate carbohydrate metabolism (70, 71). We noted increased S. mutans growth in coculture with addition of 1 µM manganese, a physiologically relevant concentration that is present in resting saliva (72). This result not only validates our approach of characterizing intermicrobial interactions leading to strategies of manipulation that can shift the balance between organisms but also highlights the critical role of trace metals in S. mutans physiology.
Our study into how saliva has impact on the growth, biofilm formation, and competitive behaviors between commensal and mutans group streptococci has solidified the importance of studying mixed-species interactions in conditions that more closely resemble their in vivo condition. While many lingering questions remain, our results provide new insights and findings that offer promising directions for the further evaluation of supporting the persistence of health-associated microbes while developing interventions to combat oral pathogens.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Human saliva and growth media
Commercially available pooled human saliva was purchased from Innovative Research. Upon receipt, the saliva was thawed, centrifuged at 4,500 RPM for 10 minutes, and then passed through a filter unit prior to local frozen storage as 10-mL aliquots. For experimental use, the saliva was thawed and used the same day. Bacterial strains used in this study (Table S7) were cultured in BHI, Tryptone Yeast extract with Glucose (TY-, 10 g tryptone, 5 g yeast extract, 3 g K2HPO4, and 3.6 g glucose L−1) or the chemically defined medium CDM (24–26). For all biofilm-related experiments, 1.7 g L−1 sucrose was added. To prepare media using –Water or –Saliva, a percentage (%) of the final volume of either liquid was first added to TY- or CDM- that had been prepared without the addition of carbohydrate. After mixing, carbohydrate(s) were then added to all media for a consistent concentration (20 mM) within all groups. Catalog numbers for all materials used in this publication are listed within Table S8.
Overnight cultures, strain inoculation, and growth measurements
Overnight cultures were harvested by centrifugation, washed, and normalized to OD600 nm = 0.1 with 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) prior to back dilution (1:100) into the experimental medium of choice. For coculture competitions, strains were inoculated according to Table S9. Growth measurements were completed using a Bioscreen C MBR automated turbidometric analyzer (Growth Curves Ab Ltd., Helsinki, Finland) with the OD600 nm recorded every 0.5 h for 24 h. Wells were overlaid with 0.05 mL sterile mineral oil. Resulting data were used to calculate doubling time [D = (time in minutes; 120)/(n, number of generations)] , final yield (average of OD600 nm for last two time points recorded), and time to OD600 nm = 0.1 (half-hour interval when OD600 nm was first >0.1). All experiments were completed with three biological replicates measured in technical triplicates.
Biofilm microscopy
Bacterial strains were inoculated into medium that contained 1 µM Alexa Fluor 647-labeled dextran, added to glass bottom, black plates, and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 24 h. Resulting biofilms were first washed with 1× PBS and incubated with BSA blocking buffer at room temperature for 0.5 h. Biofilms were then probed with two murine monoclonal antibodies against B-DNA and Z-DNA (2 µg mL−1) for 1 h at room temperature. The biofilms were washed and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with an Alexa Fluor 594-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (2 µg mL−1). Finally, the biofilms were washed and stained with Hoechst 33342 solution (5 µM final concentration) for 15 minutes. All biofilms were imaged using a 20× or 40× phase objective on a Agilent Biotek Lionheart FX automated microscope (Agilent Biotek, Winooski, Vermont, United States). Images were captured using Gen5 Image+ software, and quantification of biomass and biofilm thickness were completed either with the Gen5 Image+ software or by importing .TIF files into BiofilmQ (73). Five images of each sample, taken at 2,500-micron increments to avoid observer bias, were acquired.
Isolation of bacterial strains from human saliva
During preparation of saliva, 0.05 mL of non- or diluted saliva was spread plated on BHI agar. Plates from the thawed-only, non-processed sample contained several different bacterial colony morphologies that were picked randomly (n = 50) and grown overnight in BHI medium (37°C and 5% CO2). Cultures that grew were then streaked for single-colony isolation again. Plates that were confirmed to contain a single-colony morphology were then selected, stored long term, given a SOSUI (saliva Ohio State University isolate) identifier number, and species identified by Sanger sequencing from Eurofins Genomics using 16S rRNA primers (F - AGA GTT TGA TCC TGG CTC AG; R - TAC GGG TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT) purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies. SOSUI isolate and species identity are listed in Table S10.
Crystal Violet biofilm biomass quantification
Strains were inoculated into 96-well plates and incubated for 24 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. Following, medium from the biofilms was aspirated and plates were dunked into a bucket of water. At room temperature for 15 minutes, 0.05 mL of 0.1% crystal violet was added and incubated. The solution was removed, and plates were dunked again to remove excess crystal violet. Next, 0.2 mL of 30% acetic acid solution was added to extract the bound crystal violet and diluted 1:4 with water before the absorbance at 575 nm was recorded. All biofilm experiments were completed with three biological replicates measured in technical quadruplicates.
Fluorescent Intensity-based competitive growth assays
S. mutans UA159 GFP− (pMZ) or GFP+ strains (pMZ-Pveg::gfp) were inoculated into their respective growth media along with competitor species. Cultures were plated along with a 0.05-mL sterile mineral oil overlay and incubated for 24 h at 37°C in a Agilent Biotek Synergy H1 multimode plate reader with the OD600 nm and the fluorescent intensity of GFP (excitation 485 nm, emission 528 nm, optics bottom, gain 100) recorded every 0.5 h. For data analysis, the OD600 nm of a medium-only blank was subtracted from respective optical density readings and fluorescent intensity (a.u.) of cultures containing GFP− were subtracted from cultures containing GFP+ (medium/cell background fluorescence). After plotting the resulting data points in GraphPad Prism, an AUC of the fluorescent intensity was calculated using built-in analysis tools. All experiments were completed with three biological replicates measured in technical quadruplicates.
Colony-forming unit competitive index assays
1 x 105 cells mL-1 each of S. mutans (kanamycin resistant) and commensal (spectinomycin resistant) were inoculated. Part of the inoculum was serially diluted and plated onto both BHI kanamycin (selection of S. mutans) and BHI spectinomycin (selection of commensal) agar plates. Colony forming units (CFUs) were later enumerated from these agar plates after incubation to determine the initial cell count (ti = 0 h). The remaining inoculum was incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 24 h. Resulting cultures were harvested, washed and resuspended with 1x PBS while transferring to a 5 mL polystyrene round-bottom tube. To isolate single cells, tubes were sonicated within a water bath sonicator (four intervals of 30 s, resting 2 min on ice). Cultures were serially diluted and plated on both BHI kanamycin and spectinomycin agar plates and incubated for 48 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. Following CFU counting of the final cell count (tf = 24 h), a competitive index was calculated using the following formula:
Harvesting cultures and RNA isolation for RNA-Seq
Selected bacterial strains, in either monoculture or cocultures, were grown in the respective media until a measured optical density (OD600 nm) of 0.4 was reached before harvesting by centrifugation. RNA isolation was carried out as described elsewhere (14). RNA was sequenced through SeqCenter with their 8 M Single Reads package applied to RNA from monocultures and their 16 M Single Reads package applied to cocultures. Delivered .FASTQ files were uploaded and analyzed through Galaxy (74) with a custom pipeline (14, 75, 76) that included FASTQ Groomer (v 1.1.5), FASTQ Quality Trimmer (v 1.1.5), mapping of reads with Bowtie2 (v 2.3.4.3), and htseq-count (v 0.9.1) on genome features from species-specific .GFF3 files that resulted in a .CSV file containing non-normalized reads counts. The number and percentage of reads mapped to each species are listed within Table S11. All read counts were combined into a single .CSV file and uploaded to Degust (77) and edgeR analysis performed to determine log2 fold change and false discovery rates (FDR) for all genome features. The P value was obtained by taking the –Log10 of the FDR. All genome files for this analysis were accessed through NCBI (Table S12).
Graphing and statistics
Graphing of data were completed with GraphPad Prism (version 9.0). All statistical analysis was completed within GraphPad Prism using built-in analysis tools, including PCA of RNA-Seq data, one-way or two-way ANOVA with post hoc tests (Dunnett’s or Tukey’s test) for a multiple comparison, and AUC calculations.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) R03DE031766. Several of the strains included in this manuscript were generously provided by Matthew M. Ramsey’s group at the University of Rhode Island and by Robert A. Burne at the University of Florida.
Contributor Information
Justin R. Kaspar, Email: kaspar.17@osu.edu.
Garret Suen, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.
DATA AVAILABILITY
The resulting RNA-Seq raw sequencing and data files from this study are available from NCBI-GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus) under accession number GSE239483.
REFERENCES
- 1. Jakubovics NS. 2015. Intermicrobial interactions as a driver for community composition and stratification of oral biofilms. J Mol Biol 427:3662–3675. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.09.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Zhang M, Whiteley M, Lewin GR. 2022. Polymicrobial interactions of oral microbiota: a historical review and current perspective. mBio 13:e00235-22. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00235-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Bowen WH, Burne RA, Wu H, Koo H. 2018. Oral biofilms: pathogens, matrix, and polymicrobial interactions in microenvironments. Trends Microbiol 26:229–242. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.09.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Abranches J, Zeng L, Kajfasz JK, Palmer SR, Chakraborty B, Wen ZT, Richards VP, Brady LJ, Lemos JA. 2018. Biology of oral streptococci. Microbiol Spectr 6:GPP3-0042–2018. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0042-2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Koo H, Falsetta ML, Klein MI. 2013. The exopolysaccharide matrix: a virulence determinant of cariogenic biofilm. J Dent Res 92:1065–1073. doi: 10.1177/0022034513504218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kim D, Koo H. 2020. Spatial design of polymicrobial oral biofilm in its native disease state. J Dent Res 99:597–603. doi: 10.1177/0022034520909313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Xiao J, Klein MI, Falsetta ML, Lu B, Delahunty CM, Yates JR, Heydorn A, Koo H, Mitchell AP. 2012. The exopolysaccharide matrix modulates the interaction between 3D architecture and virulence of a mixed-species oral biofilm. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002623. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Kim D, Barraza JP, Arthur RA, Hara A, Lewis K, Liu Y, Scisci EL, Hajishengallis E, Whiteley M, Koo H. 2020. Spatial mapping of polymicrobial communities reveals a precise biogeography associated with human dental caries. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117:12375–12386. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1919099117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Loesche WJ. 1986. Role of Streptococcus mutans in human dental decay. Microbiol Rev 50:353–380. doi: 10.1128/mr.50.4.353-380.1986 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Kreth J, Merritt J, Shi W, Qi F. 2005. Competition and coexistence between Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguinis in the dental biofilm. J Bacteriol 187:7193–7203. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.21.7193-7203.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Kreth J, Zhang Y, Herzberg MC. 2008. Streptococcal antagonism in oral biofilms: Streptococcus sanguinis and Streptococcus gordonii interference with Streptococcus mutans. J Bacteriol 190:4632–4640. doi: 10.1128/JB.00276-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Nascimento MM, Browngardt C, Xiaohui X, Klepac-Ceraj V, Paster BJ, Burne RA. 2014. The effect of arginine on oral biofilm communities. Mol Oral Microbiol 29:45–54. doi: 10.1111/omi.12044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Huang X, Browngardt CM, Jiang M, Ahn S-J, Burne RA, Nascimento MM. 2018. Diversity in antagonistic interactions between commensal oral streptococci and Streptococcus mutans. Caries Res 52:88–101. doi: 10.1159/000479091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Rose M, Wilson N, Williams E, Letner H, Bettinger R, Bouchendouka A, Batagower J, Kaspar JR. 2023. Growth with commensal streptococci alters Streptococcus mutans behaviors. J Dent Res 102:450–458. doi: 10.1177/00220345221145906 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Jakubovics NS. 2015. Saliva as the sole nutritional source in the development of multispecies communities in dental plaque. Microbiol Spectr 3:MBP-0013-2014. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MBP-0013-2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Carpenter GH. 2020. Salivary factors that maintain the normal oral commensal microflora. J Dent Res 99:644–649. doi: 10.1177/0022034520915486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Martín Santos P, del Nogal Sánchez M, Pérez Pavón JL, Moreno Cordero B. 2020. Non-separative method based on a single quadrupole mass spectrometer for the semi-quantitative determination of amino acids in saliva samples. a preliminary study. Talanta 208:120381. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120381 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Sener A, Jurysta C, Bulur N, Oguzhan B, Satman I, Yilmaz TM, Malaisse WJ. 2009. Salivary glucose concentration and excretion in normal and diabetic subjects. J Biomed Biotechnol 2009:430426. doi: 10.1155/2009/430426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Wickström C, Herzberg MC, Beighton D, Svensäter G. 2009. Proteolytic degradation of human salivary MUC5B by dental biofilms. Microbiology 155:2866–2872. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.030536-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Bradshaw DJ, Homer KA, Marsh PD, Beighton D. 1994. Metabolic cooperation in oral microbial communities during growth on mucin. Microbiol 140:3407–3412. doi: 10.1099/13500872-140-12-3407 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Zhou Y, Yang J, Zhang L, Zhou X, Cisar JO, Palmer RJ. 2016. Differential utilization of basic proline-rich glycoproteins during growth of oral bacteria in saliva. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:5249–5258. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01111-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Byers HL, Tarelli E, Homer KA, Beighton D. 1999. Sequential deglycosylation and utilization of the N-linked, complex-type glycans of human α1-acid glycoprotein mediates growth of Streptococcus oralis. Glycobiology 9:469–479. doi: 10.1093/glycob/9.5.469 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Li T, Bratt P, Jonsson AP, Ryberg M, Johansson I, Griffiths WJ, Bergman T, Strömberg N. 2000. Possible release of an ArgGlyArgProGln pentapeptide with innate immunity properties from acidic proline-rich proteins by proteolytic activity in commensal Streptococcus and Actinomyces species. Infect Immun 68:5425–5429. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.9.5425-5429.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Terleckyj B, Willett NP, Shockman GD. 1975. Growth of several cariogenic strains of oral streptococci in a chemically defined medium. Infect Immun 11:649–655. doi: 10.1128/iai.11.4.649-655.1975 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Terleckyj B, Shockman GD. 1975. Amino acid requirements of Streptococcus mutans and other oral streptococci. Infect Immun 11:656–664. doi: 10.1128/iai.11.4.656-664.1975 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Chang JC, LaSarre B, Jimenez JC, Aggarwal C, Federle MJ. 2011. Two group A streptococcal peptide pheromones act through opposing Rgg regulators to control biofilm development. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002190. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Frenkel ES, Ribbeck K. 2015. Salivary mucins protect surfaces from colonization by cariogenic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:332–338. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02573-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Wu CM, Wheeler KM, Cárcamo-Oyarce G, Aoki K, McShane A, Datta SS, Mark Welch JL, Tiemeyer M, Griffen AL, Ribbeck K. 2023. Mucin glycans drive oral microbial community composition and function. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 9:11. doi: 10.1038/s41522-023-00378-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Frenkel ES, Ribbeck K. 2017. Salivary mucins promote the coexistence of competing oral bacterial species. ISME J 11:1286–1290. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Shields RC, Kaspar JR, Lee K, Underhill SAM, Burne RA. 2019. Fluorescence tools adapted for real-time monitoring of the behaviors of Streptococcus species. Appl Environ Microbiol 85:e00620-19. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00620-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Zeng L, Wen ZT, Burne RA. 2006. A novel signal transduction system and feedback loop regulate fructan hydrolase gene expression in Streptococcus mutans. Mol Microbiol 62:187–200. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05359.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Zeng L, Burne RA. 2010. Seryl-phosphorylated HPr regulates CcpA-independent carbon catabolite repression in conjunction with PTS permeases in Streptococcus mutans. Mol Microbiol 75:1145–1158. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.07029.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Ajdić D, Pham VTT. 2007. Global transcriptional analysis of Streptococcus mutans sugar transporters using microarrays. J Bacteriol 189:5049–5059. doi: 10.1128/JB.00338-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Zeng L, Burne RA. 2009. Transcriptional regulation of the cellobiose operon of Streptococcus mutans. J Bacteriol 191:2153–2162. doi: 10.1128/JB.01641-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Ajdic D, Chen Z. 2013. A novel phosphotransferase system of Streptococcus mutans is responsible for transport of carbohydrates with α-1,3 linkage. Mol Oral Microbiol 28:114–128. doi: 10.1111/omi.12009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Ouyang J, Tian XL, Versey J, Wishart A, Li YH. 2010. The BceABRS four-component system regulates the bacitracin-induced cell envelope stress response in Streptococcus mutans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:3895–3906. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01802-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Wu C, Cichewicz R, Li Y, Liu J, Roe B, Ferretti J, Merritt J, Qi F. 2010. Genomic island TnSmu2 of Streptococcus mutans harbors a nonribosomal peptide synthetase-polyketide synthase gene cluster responsible for the biosynthesis of pigments involved in oxygen and H2O2 tolerance. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:5815–5826. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03079-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. King S, Quick A, King K, Walker AR, Shields RC. 2022. Activation of TnSmu1, an integrative and conjugative element, by an ImmR-like transcriptional regulator in Streptococcus mutans. Microbiol 168:001254. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.001254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. McLellan LK, Anderson ME, Grossman AD. 2022. TnSmu1 is a functional integrative and conjugative element in Streptococcus mutans that when expressed causes growth arrest of host bacteria. Mol Microbiol 118:652–669. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Khan R, Rukke HV, Høvik H, Åmdal HA, Chen T, Morrison DA, Petersen FC, McFall-Ngai MJ. 2016. Comprehensive transcriptome profiles of Streptococcus mutans UA159 map core streptococcal competence genes. mSystems 1:e00038-15. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00038-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Serbanescu MA, Cordova M, Krastel K, Flick R, Beloglazova N, Latos A, Yakunin AF, Senadheera DB, Cvitkovitch DG. 2015. Role of the Streptococcus mutans CRISPR-CAS systems in immunity and cell physiology. J Bacteriol 197:749–761. doi: 10.1128/JB.02333-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Walker AR, Shields RC. 2022. Investigating CRISPR spacer targets and their impact on genomic diversification of Streptococcus mutans Front Genet 13:997341. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.997341 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Baker JL, Lindsay EL, Faustoferri RC, Quivey RG, To TT, Hendrickson EL, He X, Shi W, McLean JS. 2018. Characterization of the trehalose utilization operon in Streptococcus mutans reveals that the TreR transcriptional regulator is invovled in stress response pathways and toxin production. J Bacteriol 200:e00057-18. doi: 10.1128/JB.00057-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Moye ZD, Son M, Rosa-Alberty AE, Zeng L, Ahn S-J, Hagen SJ, Burne RA. 2016. Effects of carbohydrate source on genetic competence in Streptococcus mutans. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:4821–4834. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01205-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Hutinet G, Swarjo MA, de Crécy-Lagard V. 2017. Deazaguanine derivatives, examples of crosstalk between RNA and DNA modification pathways. RNA Biol 14:1175–1184. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2016.1265200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Cheng W, Li Q, Jiang YL, Zhou CZ, Chen Y, Desvaux M. 2013. Structures of Streptococcus pneumoniae PiaA and its complex with ferrichrome reveal insights into the substrate binding and release of high affinity iron transporters. PLoS ONE 8:e71451. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071451 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Santos JA, Rempel S, Mous STM, Pereira CT, Beek JT, de Gier JW, Guskov A, Slotboom DJ. 2018. Functional and structural characterization of an ECF-type ABC transporter for vitamin B12. eLife 7:e35828. doi: 10.7554/eLife.35828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Morikawa Y, Morimoto S, Yoshida E, Naka S, Inaba H, Matsumoto-Nakano M. 2020. Identification and functional analysis of glutamine transporter in Streptococcus mutans J Oral Microbiol 12:1797320. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2020.1797320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. He LY, Le YJ, Guo Z, Li S, Yang XY. 2021. The role and regulatory network of the CiaRH two-component system in streptococcal species. Front Microbiol 12:693858. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.693858 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Aggarwal S, Kumaraswami M. 2022. Managing manganese: the role of manganese homeostasis in streptococcal pathogenesis. Front Cell Dev Biol 10:921920. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.921920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Kajfasz JK, Katrak C, Ganguly T, Vargas J, Wright L, Peters ZT, Spatafora GA, Abranches J, Lemos JA. 2020. Manganese uptake, mediated by SloABC and MntH, is essential for the fitness of Streptococcus mutans. mSphere 5:e00764-19. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00764-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Webb AJ, Homer KA, Hosie AHF. 2008. Two closely related ABC transporters in Streptococcus mutans are involved in disaccharide and/or oligosaccharide uptake. J Bacteriol 190:168–178. doi: 10.1128/JB.01509-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Vergauwen B, Verstraete K, Senadheera DB, Dansercoer A, Cvitkovitch DG, Guédon E, Savvides SN. 2013. Molecular and structural basis of glutathione import in gram-positive bacteria via GshT and the cystine ABC importer TcyBC of Streptococcus mutans. Mol Microbiol 89:288–303. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Kovacs CJ, Faustoferri RC, Bischer AP, Quivey RG. 2019. Streptococcus mutans requires mature rhamnose-glucose polysaccharides for proper pathophysiology, morphogenesis and cellular division. Mol Microbiol 112:944–959. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Bischer AP, Kovacs CJ, Faustoferri RC, Quivey RG. 2020. Disruption of L-Rhamnose biosynthesis results in severe growth defects in Streptococcus mutans. J Bacteriol 202:e00728-19. doi: 10.1128/JB.00728-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Willis LM, Zhang R, Reid A, Withers SG, Wakarchuk WW. 2009. Mechanistic investigation of the endo-α-N-acetylgalactosaminidase from Streptococcus pneumoniae R6. Biochem 48:10334–10341. doi: 10.1021/bi9013825 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Gangi Setty T, Sarkar A, Coombes D, Dobson RCJ, Subramanian R. 2020. Structure and function of N-acetylmannosamine kinases from pathogenic bacteria . ACS Omega 5:30923–30936. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c03699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. De Jong MH, Van Der Hoeven JS, Van OS JH, Olijve JH. 1984. Growth of oral Streptococcus species and Actinomyces viscosus in human saliva. Appl Environ Microbiol 47:901–904. doi: 10.1128/aem.47.5.901-904.1984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Palmer J, Kazmerzak K, Hansen MC, Kolenbrander PE. 2001. Mutualism versus independence: strategies of mixed-species oral biofilms in vitro using saliva as the sole nutrient source. Infect Immun 69:5794–5804. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.9.5794-5804.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Singla D, Sharma A, Sachdev V, Chopra R. 2016. Distribution of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus in dental plaque of Indian pre-school children using PCR and SB-20m agar medium. J Clin Diagnostic Res 10:ZC60–ZC63. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/19256.8909 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Johansson I, Witkowska E, Kaveh B, Lif Holgerson P, Tanner ACR. 2016. The microbiome in populations with a low and high prevalence of caries. J Dent Res 95:80–86. doi: 10.1177/0022034515609554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Okada M, Kawamura M, Oda Y, Yasuda R, Kojima T, Kurihara H. 2012. Caries prevalence associated with Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus in Japanese schoolchildren. Int J Paediatr Dent 22:342–348. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2011.01203.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Sener A, Jurysta C, Bulur N, Oguzhan B, Satman I, Yilmaz TM, Malaisse WJ. 2009. Salivary glucose concentration and excretion in normal and diabetic subjects. J Biomed Biotechnol 2009:430426. doi: 10.1155/2009/430426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Sztajer H, Lemme A, Vilchez R, Schulz S, Geffers R, Yip CYY, Levesque CM, Cvitkovitch DG, Wagner-Döbler I. 2008. Autoinducer-2-regulated genes in Streptococcus mutans UA159 and global metabolic effect of the luxS mutation. J Bacteriol 190:401–415. doi: 10.1128/JB.01086-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Kolenbrander PE, Andersen RN, Blehert DS, Egland PG, Foster JS, Palmer RJ. 2002. Communication among oral bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66:486–505, doi: 10.1128/MMBR.66.3.486-505.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Werlang CA, Chen WG, Aoki K, Wheeler KM, Tymm C, Mileti CJ, Burgos AC, Kim K, Tiemeyer M, Ribbeck K. 2021. Mucin O-glycans suppress quorum-sensing pathways and genetic transformation in Streptococcus mutans. Nat Microbiol 6:574–583. doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-00876-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Ruxin TR, Schwartzman JA, Davidowitz CR, Peters Z, Holtz A, Haney RA, Spatafora GA. 2021. Regulatory involvement of the PerR and SloR metalloregulators in the Streptococcus mutans oxidative stress response. J Bacteriol 203:e00678-20. doi: 10.1128/JB.00678-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Martin ME, Byers BR, Olson MOJ, Salin ML, Arceneaux JE, Tolbert C. 1986. A Streptococcus mutans superoxide dismutase that is active with either manganese or iron as a cofactor. J Biol Chem 261:9361–9367. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)67663-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Touati D. 2000. Iron and oxidative stress in bacteria. Arch Biochem Biophys 373:1–6. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1999.1518 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Aranha H, Strachan RC, Arceneaux JEL, Byers BR. 1982. Effect of trace metals on growth of Streptococcus mutans in a teflon chemostat. Infect Immun 35:456–460. doi: 10.1128/iai.35.2.456-460.1982 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Breighton D. 1982. The influence of manganese on carbohydrate metabolism and caries induction by Streptococcus mutans strain ingbritt. Caries Res 16:189–192. doi: 10.1159/000260596 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Duggal MS, Chawla HS, Curzon MEJ. 1991. A study of the relationship between trace elements in saliva and dental caries in children. Arch Oral Biol 36:881–884. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(91)90118-e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Hartmann R, Jeckel H, Jelli E, Singh PK, Vaidya S, Bayer M, Rode DKH, Vidakovic L, Díaz-Pascual F, Fong JCN, Dragoš A, Lamprecht O, Thöming JG, Netter N, Häussler S, Nadell CD, Sourjik V, Kovács ÁT, Yildiz FH, Drescher K. 2021. Quantitative image analysis of microbial communities with biofilmQ. Nat Microbiol 6:151–156. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-00817-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Jalili V, Afgan E, Gu Q, Clements D, Blankenberg D, Goecks J, Taylor J, Nekrutenko A. 2020. The galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2020 update. Nucleic Acids Res 48:W395–W402. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa434 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Kaspar JR, Lee K, Richard B, Walker AR, Burne RA. 2021. Direct interactions with commensal streptococci modify Intercellular communication behaviors of Streptococcus mutans . ISME J 15:473–488. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-00789-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Kaspar J, Shields RC, Burne RA. 2018. Competence inhibition by the XrpA peptide encoded within the comX gene of Streptococcus mutans. Mol Microbiol 109:345–364. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Powell D, Milton M, Perry A, Santos K. 2019. drpowell/degust 4.1.1. Available from: 10.5281/ZENODO.3501067 [DOI]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The resulting RNA-Seq raw sequencing and data files from this study are available from NCBI-GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus) under accession number GSE239483.









