Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Mar;59(6):791. doi: 10.1111/apt.17886

Editorial: Updated epidemiology of steatotic liver disease in people with HIV in the United States - authors’ reply

Samer Gawrieh 1, Mark Sulkowski 2, Naga Chalasani 1, Rohit Loomba 3
PMCID: PMC10901450  NIHMSID: NIHMS1958483  PMID: 38401140

We thank Dr. Manikat and colleagues for their insightful comments.1 We concur with their views that use of the new NAFLD nomenclature may reduce stigma in people living with HIV (PWH) while allowing the use of accurate terminology to characterize different steatotic liver disease (SLD) phenotypes.2 It was reassuring to observe that application of the new criteria for defining each SLD phenotype/category did not result in a significant change in the proportion of PWH who would have been previously diagnosed with NAFLD but are now diagnosed with MASLD. Only 0.6% of the participants with SLD in our cohort had no cardiometabolic risk factors, thus not qualifying as MASLD.3 These participants would have been previously classified as lean NAFLD. Therefore, it would be safe to think that prior research findings pertaining to NAFLD in PWH could be extended in future studies to MASLD in this population.

Patients with SLD who consume moderate amounts of alcohol and also have cardiometabolic risk factors are now classified as having MetALD, constituting 20% of PWH with SLD. This observation underscores the relatively high prevalence of alcohol use and its importance in the pathogenesis SLD in PWH.4 Since these patients were excluded from prior research studies for not meeting the definition for NAFLD or ALD, more studies will be needed to understand if the performance of biomarkers of NAFLD/MASLD would be similar in these patients and whether they would have a more accelerated disease course and develop liver-related outcome faster or at higher rates compared to those with MASLD or ALD.5

References

  • 1.Manikat R, Kim SU, Ahmed A, Kim D. Editorial: Updated epidemiology of steatotic liver disease in people with HIV in the United States. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2023; in press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rinella ME, Lazarus JV, Ratziu V, et al. A multi-society Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature. Hepatology Jun 24 2023;doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000520 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gawrieh S, Vilar-Gomez E, Woreta TA, Lake JE, Wilson LA, Price JC, et al. Prevalence of steatotic liver disease, MASLD, MetALD and significant fibrosis in people with HIV in the United States. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2023; 00: 1–14. 10.1111/apt.17849 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Duko B, Ayalew M, Ayano G. The prevalence of alcohol use disorders among people living with HIV/AIDS: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2019/11/14 2019;14(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13011-019-0240-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Loomba R, Wong VW. Implications of the new nomenclature of steatotic liver disease and definition of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther Jan 2024;59(2):150–156. doi: 10.1111/apt.17846 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES