Skip to main content
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine logoLink to Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
. 2023 Jul 9;28(5):e17839. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.17839

Calreticulin: Endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ gatekeeper

Marek Michalak 1,
PMCID: PMC10902585  PMID: 37424156

Abstract

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) luminal Ca2+ is vital for the function of the ER and regulates many cellular processes. Calreticulin is a highly conserved, ER‐resident Ca2+ binding protein and lectin‐like chaperone. Over four decades of studying calreticulin demonstrate that this protein plays a crucial role in maintaining Ca2+ supply under different physiological conditions, in managing access to Ca2+ and how Ca2+ is used depending on the environmental events and in making sure that Ca2+ is not misused. Calreticulin plays a role of ER luminal Ca2+ sensor to manage Ca2+‐dependent ER luminal events including maintaining interaction with its partners, Ca2+ handling molecules, substrates and stress sensors. The protein is strategically positioned in the lumen of the ER from where the protein manages access to and distribution of Ca2+ for many cellular Ca2+‐signalling events. The importance of calreticulin Ca2+ pool extends beyond the ER and includes influence of cellular processes involved in many aspects of cellular pathophysiology. Abnormal handling of the ER Ca2+ contributes to many pathologies from heart failure to neurodegeneration and metabolic diseases.


When all the parts of the puzzle start to look like they fit it. Van Morrison

1. INTRODUCTION

My encounter with calreticulin started in the 70s after David MacLennan's group identified in skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) a new Ca2+ binding protein and named it the High‐Affinity Ca2+ Binding Protein (HACBP). 1 For a decade, the HACBP did not receive much attention, as it was considered a minor component of the muscle SR membrane, a highly specialized form of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) responsible for handling Ca2+ for muscle contraction and relaxation. 2 Additionally, this protein was difficult to purify and its importance in cellular function or muscle excitation–contraction coupling was not understood. It was in 1980s that I asked, what appears today to be a rather trivial question: what is responsible for Ca2+ handling in lumen of the ER in non‐muscle cells? Based on our initial work, it was immediately obvious that HACBP is a major Ca2+ binding/storage protein in the lumen of the ER in non‐muscle cells. 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 Because of its Ca2+ binding properties and ER luminal localization we chose ‘calreticulin’ as the new name for HACBP. 4 Isolation of the cDNA for calreticulin and the identification of a C‐terminal KDEL amino acid sequence in the calreticulin protein that serves as an ER retrieval signal brought at that time new excitement to the field of ER cell biology. 4 , 8 This coincided with the seminal discovery by the Hugh Pelham group that ER‐resident proteins require a KDEL‐like motif at their extreme C‐terminus to be retained/retrieved to the lumen of ER. 9 , 10 , 11 This firmly established calreticulin as an ER‐resident protein. Today, many more proteins with the KDEL signature have joined calreticulin as ER‐resident proteins.

Ca2+ is a universal signalling molecule in control of a spectrum of cellular processes. 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 In the lumen of ER calreticulin binds, stores and delivers Ca2+ for many cellular functions. 17 , 18 , 19 It is not surprising therefore that studies on calreticulin biology have revealed the role in or association with many cellular processes: from Ca2+ signalling, protein synthesis and folding, posttranslational modification, stress response, energy metabolism, transcriptional regulation, organogenesis, fertilization, viral infection, wound healing, cell–cell communication, immune responses to cell motility and many more. Remarkably, many of these can be explained by the function of calreticulin as a Ca2+ handling protein. Numerous review articles have been published on ER, protein quality control, ER chaperones, ER stress and ER Ca2+ homeostasis. 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 Here, I focus on the biology of calreticulin as a Ca2+ binding/handling protein and on the co‐dependence of many Ca2+‐dependent cellular processes on Ca2+ and calreticulin.

2. THE CALRETICULIN GENE

Two calreticulin genes (calreticulin‐1 and calreticulin‐2) have been identified in human, pig, rat and mouse. 52 , 53 Plants have two distinct groups of calreticulin: calreticulin‐1/calreticulin‐2 and calreticulin‐3 group encoded by three calreticulin genes. 37 , 54 , 55 Plant calreticulin genes are not discussed in this review. The calreticulin‐2 gene is expressed specifically in the testis and is silent in other tissues. 52 The function of CALR‐2 gene has yet to be determined and it is also not discussed here. The human calreticulin gene (CALR‐1) is ubiquitously expressed, consists of 9 exons and spans approximately 5.8 kb and is localized in chromosome 19 (Figure 1). 56 The nucleotide sequences of the human and mouse genes show greater than 70% identity, indicating a strong evolutionary conservation. 56 , 57 Consequently, the regulation of the calreticulin gene, the amino acid sequences and function of the calreticulin protein are also highly conserved. The human and mouse calreticulin promoter contains several binding sites for transcription factors including tissue specific factors. Direct regulation of expression of the calreticulin gene by some of these factors has been confirmed experimentally including Nkx2.5, MEF2C, GATA6, PPARα, PPARγ, COUP‐TF1 and Evi‐1 factors. 58 The CALR gene, along with several other genes, is also activated by environmental stress including depletion of intracellular Ca2+ stores in vitro and in vivo. 57 Increased abundance of calreticulin under environmental stress conditions is a part of the ER stress coping response in attempt to build up ER Ca2+ capacity necessary for restoration of ER homeostasis.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Human calreticulin gene and protein. The human calreticulin gene (CALR‐1) is localized to chromosome 19 (19p13.13) and consist of 9 exons over 5.8 kb. The calreticulin protein consists of a signal peptide (red), N‐terminal globular domain (green), central proline‐rich P‐domain (orange) and C‐terminal Ca2+ binding C‐domain (blue). Repeats A (amino acid sequence PXXIXDPDAXKPEDWDE [red boxes]) and B (amino acid sequence GXWXPPXIXNPXYX [yellow boxes]) are indicated in the P‐domain. The location of the disulphide bond between Cys105‐Cys137 and free Cys163 in the P‐domain is indicated. CALR, calreticulin; PDI, protein disulphide isomerase; a.a, amino acid.

Except for their unique C‐terminal domains, calreticulin and calnexin, a type 1 integral ER membrane chaperone (discussed below), share many structural features. 17 , 59 However, the human calnexin gene (CANX) consist of 15 exons (33 kb) encoding 592 amino acid residue polypeptide and it is located on chromosome 5. 59 , 60 Furthermore, phylogenetic analysis indicates that calreticulin and calnexin existed as separate proteins derived from independent clades. 61 It is important to realize that calnexin is anchored to the ER membrane by transmembrane domain with limited mobility in the ER 59 whereas calreticulin is a resident ER luminal protein with high Ca2+ binding capacity free to move in the ER lumen. 17

3. THE CALRETICULIN PROTEIN

Calreticulin is made up of 417 amino acids, including a 17 residue N‐terminal signal sequence directing the protein to the ER and a C‐terminal KDEL ER retrieval signal (Figures 1 and 2). The protein is composed of three structural and functional domains. These domains were originally defined based on computational analysis of the amino acid sequence, 4 , 17 but subsequently confirmed and refined based on the empirical (mutational and structural) analysis of the purified protein (Figures 1 and 2). 62 , 63 , 64 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Three‐dimensional structure of calreticulin. The crystal structure of the human calreticulin CALR‐1. The location of peptide binding, the high‐affinity Ca2+ binding site and Zn2+ binding site is indicated. The PDIA3 and PDIA9 binding site is located at the tip of the P‐domain. A stretch of acidic amino acid residues in the C‐domain is involved in a high‐capacity Ca2+ binding is shown. The broken line represents unstructured regions of the protein. The model is based on X‐ray, Cryo‐EM and NMR data: PDB ID:1HHN, PDB ID:3POW. 38 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65

The highly conserved globular N‐terminal domain contributes to carbohydrate and polypeptide binding, and has binding sites for Zn2+ (Figure 2). 68 , 73 , 74 , 75 Many chaperones are regulated by ATP to facilitate chaperone–client interactions. 76 , 77 As such, ATP also binds to calreticulin 78 , 79 , 80 and calnexin, 81 , 82 resulting in conformational changes.

The P‐domain of calreticulin forms an extended arm which contains a binding site for the thiol oxidoreductase PDIA3 (also known as ERp57), 83 , 84 PDIA9 (also known as ERp29) 85 and cyclophilin B (Figure 2). 86 , 87 The interaction between calreticulin and PDIA3 supports protein folding in the ER. 20 The P‐domain also interacts with perforin, a pore forming protein in the granules of cytotoxic T lymphocytes. 88 , 89 , 90 Originally, the N‐ and P‐domains were considered as the core of the chaperone unit of calreticulin. 91 Structural analyses of calreticulin by Kalle Gehring's group showed that a part of the C‐domain (from P301 to E363) also contributes to a carbohydrate binding pocket of the protein. 38 , 62 Recombinant calreticulin P‐domain purified from E. coli binds Ca2+ with high affinity (K d < 1 μM) but at low capacity (1 mol of Ca2+/mol of protein). 60 , 64 , 91 , 92 Analysis of the crystal structures of the N‐ and P‐domains of calreticulin identified a Ca2+ ion coordinated by amino acids Asp328, Gln26, Lys62 and Lys64 62 corresponding to the high‐affinity Ca2+ binding side identified for calreticulin. This Ca2+ remains tightly bound to the protein and coordinates the calreticulin structure. The loss of Ca2+ binding to the high‐affinity site is expected to result in a drastic conformational change in calreticulin.

The C‐domain of calreticulin, which contains five clusters of acidic amino acid residues, is the Ca2+ binding unit of the protein and binds Ca2+ with low affinity (K d = 2 mM) but at high capacity (20–30 mol of Ca2+/mol of protein). 60 , 91 The unstructured C‐terminal Ca2+ binding domain terminates with a KDEL amino acid sequence that is responsible for ER retrieval of the protein. The C‐domain of calreticulin is responsible for maintaining 50% of the total cellular Ca2+ within the ER. 91 , 93 Mutations in exon 9, encoding the C‐domain of the protein, were identified in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), essential thrombocythaemia, and primary myelofibrosis resulting in a frameshift within exon 9 to generate a novel C‐terminal amino acid sequence. 94 , 95 , 96 The beauty of calreticulin is that each of the calreticulin domains perform specialized Ca2+‐dependent functions in the ER: the N‐ and P‐domains playing a role of lectin‐like chaperone, the P‐domain providing site for Ca2+‐dependent docking of folding enzymes and the C‐domain being necessary for the high‐capacity Ca2+ binding role of the protein (discussed below).

3.1. Three‐dimensional structure of calreticulin

One important advance in our understanding of the structure of calreticulin was the elucidation of the crystal structure of the luminal domain of calnexin. Calnexin shares similarity with calreticulin's amino acid sequence encoding N‐ and P‐domains. 59 , 73 , 97 , 98 Combined with solving the structure of the P‐domain of calreticulin by NMR technique, 64 the 3D structure provided for the first‐time structural information on calreticulin (reviewed in 38 ).

For a decade, many attempts were undertaken to obtain a crystal structure of calreticulin. These efforts failed likely due to the flexible nature of the extended P‐domain arm and unstructured C‐domain. A major breakthrough came from Kalle Gehring's group who was successful in solving the three‐dimensional structure of recombinant calreticulin expressed without a larger portion of the flexible C‐domain. 38 , 62 This was followed by determination of the crystal structure of the globular domain of the calreticulin 63 and Cryo‐EM studies of the human MHC‐I peptide loading complex. 65 A large portion of the C‐domain (>30 residues) remains missing in these structures due to being highly disordered. Isolated C‐domain of calreticulin remains disorder at low Ca2+ concentration but shows a more compact conformation at the high Ca2+ concentration. 99 , 100 This likely contributes to a Ca2+ sensor‐like function of calreticulin. 99 Recent elegant studies on structural properties of calreticulin mutants associated with MNP indicate that the C‐domain is partially α‐helical and it plays a role in CALRdel52 mutant interaction with the TpoR. 101 Considering the high concentration of calreticulin in the ER lumen, the highly flexible (and mobile) Ca2+ binding C‐domain of calreticulin and extended P‐domain arm of the protein are designed to protect the ER luminal environment against self‐aggregation (crystallization) of the protein. Ca2+ binding to calreticulin also contributes to preventing protein aggregation by prompting conformational changes sensitive to ER Ca2+ fluctuations. 102 The presence of the highly flexible protein regions and the unstructured low‐affinity Ca2+ binding segments are likely a common protective mechanism for preventing self‐aggregation of other ER‐resident proteins that are highly concentrated in the ER lumen (100 mg protein/ml representing over 3% of all human proteins [Human Protein Atlas; https://www.proteinatlas.org/humanproteome/subcellular/endoplasmic+reticulum#:~:text=246%20proteins%20in%20the%20endoplasmic,a%20cell%20to%20cell%20variation]).

Based on available structural information, it is now possible to build a three‐dimensional model of calreticulin with recognizable functionally important regions and identification of specific amino acid residues necessary for these functions (Figure 2). The carbohydrate recognition site encompasses amino acid residues 18–203 in the N‐domain and residues Pro301 to Glu363 in the C‐domain. 38 , 62 Site specific mutation analysis also identified a disulphide bridge between Cys105 and Cys137, and Lys111 as important in the binding of carbohydrate moieties by calreticulin. 38 , 62 , 75 Notably, substitution of Cys137Ala, Cys105Ala and Trp319Ala alter chaperone function in vitro. 66 These mutations change the flexibility of the calreticulin backbone and the secondary structure of the N‐domain due to new interdomain contacts between the P‐domain, globular N‐domain and parts of the C‐domain. 70 The Lys111Ala substitution impairs calreticulin–carbohydrate interactions, 75 and Cys105 and Cys137 are involved in contacts with carbohydrate. 62 Cys105, Cys137, Asp135 and Trp319 were identified important in peptide binding to calreticulin. 63 Although four His residues within the N‐domain of calreticulin have been proposed to coordinate zinc binding, 103 , 104 , 105 only His42 is accessible and together with Asp118, Asp121, His123 and Asp125 it forms a zinc binding site. 62 However, the importance of these residues in the binding of zinc needs to be experimentally tested. Biochemical and biophysical analyses of several calreticulin mutants identified additional structural features of the protein, including conserved clusters of surface exposed amino acid residues important for maintaining structural stability of the protein. 71 Tyr172 and Asp187 are crucial for maintaining the native structure of the protein, while Tyr172 engages the free Cys163 residue to support the thermal stability of calreticulin. 71

Amino acid residues Glu255, Glu256, Asp248, Glu260, Trp261 (Figure 2) at the tip of the hairpin‐like structure of the P‐domain are the site of binding of PDIA3, a folding enzyme 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 and PDIA9, a protein involved biosynthesis and trafficking of secretory and transmembrane proteins (Figure 2). 106 , 107 Cyclophilin B, a member of the family of peptidyl cis/trans protein isomerases (PPI), important for collagen folding, 108 also binds to the tip of the P‐domain of calreticulin (Figure 2). 85 PDIA1 was the first oxidoreductase identified as interacting with calreticulin 109 and PDIA1 binding to calreticulin affects luminal ER redox conditions upon Ca2+ depletion, 110 linking ER luminal redox environment to Ca2+ handling. Being a member of the oxidoreductases family of folding enzymes it is likely that PDIA1 also docks on the tip of the P‐domain. Most importantly, under physiological conditions interactions between the P‐domain of calreticulin and oxidoreductases are sensitive to ER luminal Ca2+ provided by calreticulin.

Considering the three‐dimensional arrangement of the P‐domain as a long arm extending from the globular, carbohydrate binding domain of calreticulin, the tip of the P‐domain offers a perfect docking place for folding enzymes to associate with calreticulin to accelerate protein folding. The breakthrough advances in structural studies of calreticulin revealed a distinctive 3D architecture of the protein domains and helped to understand how calreticulin domains perform Ca2+‐dependent specialized functions; from Ca2+ binding, storage and control of Ca2+‐dependent interactions with folding enzymes to lectin‐like chaperone function.

3.2. Phenotypes associated with known calreticulin gene variants

Recently, there has been a renewed interest in calreticulin due to a discovery of calreticulin gene variants associated with chronic blood tumours known as myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN). 94 , 95 , 96 More than 60 different variants leading to a shift of the reading frame in calreticulin exon 9 (encoding the Ca2+ binding C‐domain of the protein) have been identified in more than 30% of MPN patients. 94 , 95 , 111 , 112 The two most common variants are a 52 base pair deletion (Type 1/CALRdel52 frequency 53%) and a 5 base pair insertion (Type 2/CALRins5 frequency 32%). These shift of the reading frame mutations result in expression of a novel C‐terminal amino acid in the calreticulin protein (Figure 3). Both frameshift mutations cause a loss of KDEL ER retrieval sequence with some of mutant calreticulin localized to the ER of haematopoietic cells and remaining being transported out of the ER and mis‐localized to the cell surface. 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 On cell surface, mis‐localized calreticulin variants bind to the thrombopoietin receptor (TpoR), and activate downstream JAK2/STAT5/STAT3 signalling. 114 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 Furthermore, calreticulin mutants secreted from malignant cells inhibit phagocytosis of dying cancer cells by dendritic cells resulting in immunosuppressive effects. 122 Importantly, the frameshift mutations of calreticulin render the C‐terminus of the protein with positively charged, affecting the Ca2+ capacity to the protein. 115 Comparison of CALRdel52 to CALRins5 (Figure 3) indicates that while CALRdel52 has all the negative charges of the calreticulin C‐terminus converted to positive charges, there is only a ~ 50% change in charge in the CALRins5 variant. 94 , 95 , 112 The loss of Ca2+ binding sites on the CALRdel52 mutant (not to CALRins5) results in reduced ER Ca2+ storage capacity and activation of UPR. 123

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Model of calreticulin variants identified in myeloproliferative neoplasm. The frameshift within the exon 9 of the calreticulin gene generates a novel C‐terminus with most of negatively charges amino acid residues of the native C‐domain replaced with positively charged amino acid residue. The two most common calreticulin mutations are shown in the Figure: a 52 base pair deletion (CALRdel52) and a 5 base pair insertion (CALRins5). These mutations generate novel amino acid sequence of the C‐domain (shown in red). The ER retrieval KDEL sequence is lost in both mutants. Amino acid sequence of the native C‐domain (wild‐type) is also shown.

There are also a numerous somatic mutations in the calreticulin gene identified in variety of cancers (https://www.cbioportal.org/results/mutations?case_set_id=all&gene_list=CALR&cancer_study_list=5c8a7d55e4b046111fee2296). These mutations are scattered across all regions of the protein but their functional consequences and their role in cancer biology are not known.

Recently, several variants in the calreticulin gene have been identified in sudden unexpected death patients 71 (Figure 4) although their contribution to the sudden unexpected death remains to be established. Intriguingly, these mutations are identified in different regions of calreticulin including the globular N‐domain, P‐domain and Ca2+ binding C‐terminal domain (Figure 4). These mutations are predicted to affect protein stability and Ca2+ binding. Sudden unexpected death is frequently associated with heart failure due to altered Ca2+ handling by cardiomyocytes 124 , 125 , 126 and impaired Ca2+ binding to calreticulin variants is expected to contribute to the sudden unexpected death phenotype (see below for a role of calreticulin Ca2+ pool in cardiac pathophysiology).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Model of calreticulin depicting protein variants identified in sudden death patients. Shown is the location of calreticulin mutations identified in sudden unexpected death patients. A direct link between mutations of the calreticulin gene and sudden death has not been established. Information on possible related mutations was received from Drs. D.J. Tester and M.J. Ackerman at the Windland Smith Rice Sudden Death Genomics Laboratory at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

4. THE ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM: CALRETICULIN'S ‘DOMICILE’

The ER is a multifaceted and multifunctional cellular organelle. 19 , 34 , 51 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 The ER is a major component of the cellular reticular network (CRN) that includes the Golgi apparatus, lysosomes, peroxisomes, components of the endocytic pathway, as well as the nuclear envelope, 19 , 34 , 128 and occupies about 50% of the total CRN membrane area. 19 , 34 , 128 The ER is the site for the synthesis of many proteins and lipids, structural components of biological membranes. Furthermore, the ER forms functional connections (membrane contact sites) with other cellular organelles, and the plasma membrane impacting on organellar and cell–cell communication. 12 , 19 , 34 , 51 , 127 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 Considering the dynamic connections between the ER and other intracellular organelles within the CRN, 19 , 34 , 128 , 138 , 139 it is not surprising that calreticulin has been detected in other organelles including Golgi, endosomes, cytolytic granules and cortical granules. 88 , 140 , 141 , 142 , 143 , 144 Consequently, both calreticulin and Ca2+, being centrally located in the ER, have the ability to control major cellular functions far beyond the ER.

The main intracellular site for Ca2+ storage and signalling is the ER. 12 ER luminal Ca2+ modulates many ER functions including protein synthesis and folding, protein quality control, chaperone–chaperone/folding enzymes and chaperone–client interactions, and ER stress coping responses including the unfolded protein response (UPR). 12 In addition to the high content of Ca2+, the ER is well equipped with many resident proteins that monitor and assess cellular needs, respond to changes in cellular and organellar homeostasis, perform adjustments to homeostasis, eliminate misfolded proteins and maintain its own healthy homeostasis for immediate stress/emergency responses. Just like a hospital ‘emergency room (ER)’, the ER with its extraordinarily wide spectrum of associated functions and the ability to deal with many cellular emergencies. Calreticulin lives in the crowded ER ‘emergency room’ where it has the responsibility of supplying and managing Ca2+‐dependent events.

There are instances when calreticulin is found outside the cell (reviewed in 30 ). For example, extracellular calreticulin has been seen to bind to thrombospondin and participate in cell signalling leading to the assembly and disassembly of focal adhesions and increased motility. 145 , 146 , 147 Leslie Gold's group discovered that extracellular calreticulin promotes repair of cutaneous wounds. 30 , 148 , 149 , 150 , 151 , 152 Extracellular calreticulin plays a protective role in the central nervous system as brain cells release native calreticulin under ER stress conditions. 153 , 154 Furthermore, extracellular calreticulin (or the C‐domain fragment of the protein) binds to blood‐clotting factors and inhibits injury‐induced restenosis. 155

Calreticulin has been linked to many cancers (reviewed by Fucikova et al. 28 ). The Peter Henson group 156 discovered that extracellular calreticulin binds to and activates the LDL receptor‐related protein (LRP) on phagocytic cell to prevent activation of the ‘don't eat me’ signal. Obeid et al. 157 reported that in mice extracellular calreticulin generates ‘eat me’ signal for phagocytic cells. Extracellular calreticulin has also been identified as pro‐phagocytic signal on the surface of several human cancers as well as vital for the immunogenic cell death of cancer cells. 158 , 159 , 160 Thus, extracellular calreticulin promotes the uptake of cell by professional phagocytes and initiates of anticancer immunity. Many years ago, it was found that individuals infected with Trypanosoma cruzi presented with a low incidence of cancer compared to non‐infected individuals. 161 This was many years before calreticulin was discovered. Today it is known that calreticulin secreted by T. cruzi plays a protective role in cancer by increasing tumour immunogenicity and inhibiting tumour growth. 162 , 163 , 164 , 165 , 166 , 167 , 168 , 169 Both T. cruzi calreticulin and host extracellular calreticulin likely affect the immune response in cancer by similar mechanisms. The pool of calreticulin (ER versus extracellular and/or Ca2+ handling by calreticulin) responsible for the beneficial or detrimental role in cancer remains to be determined.

Importantly, it remains to be established whether and how calreticulin finds a way to exit the ER and travels all the way to the cell surface to influence pathophysiology. This may be facilitated by various stress stimuli, such as inflammation and hypoxia 45 or release of calreticulin from broken or apoptotic cells. The protein may also leave the ER bound to secreted proteins or newly synthesized cell surface receptors. 170 , 171 Regardless, it is inevitable that the departure of calreticulin from the ER (its domicile) alters cellular Ca2+ handling.

5. CALRETICULIN, THE CHAPERONE

The role of calreticulin as a molecular chaperone and a component of the calreticulin/calnexin cycle has been extensively reviewed. 20 , 21 , 22 , 39 , 172 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 , 177 , 178 , 179 The calreticulin/calnexin cycle is central to the protein quality control machinery, which disposes of misfolded secretory proteins before they can exit the ER. 20 , 180 , 181 Since calreticulin is an ER lumen‐resident protein, it is unconstrained and can move freely within the ER lumen. In contrast calnexin movement is restricted in the ER because it is an integral ER membrane protein anchored to the membrane via a transmembrane helix followed by large cytoplasmic domain (Figure 5). 59 The chaperone function of calreticulin and calnexin ER luminal domain is interchangeable but the spectrum of glycoproteins that calreticulin or calnexin bind is determined by topological environment, that is whether they are attached to a membrane (calnexin) or are free in the ER lumen (calreticulin). 182 Regardless, both proteins require the presence of Ca2+ (supplied by calreticulin) to perform their role of chaperones. 60 , 66

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Calreticulin and calnexin. Calreticulin (A) and calnexin (B) share amino acid sequence similarities in their N‐terminal globular N‐domain and proline‐rich P‐domain. Calreticulin is an ER‐resident soluble protein (A) whereas calnexin is a type 1 integral ER membrane protein (B). The C‐terminal regions of the proteins are unique for each protein. Calreticulin has a high‐capacity Ca2+ binding C‐domain whereas C‐terminal domain of calnexin is extended into cytosol. Calreticulin model is based on PDB ID:1HHN, PDB ID:3POW. Calnexin model based on PDB ID:1JHN. TM, transmembrane.

The role of calreticulin in the immune system has been extensively studied. 20 , 173 , 183 , 184 , 185 , 186 , 187 , 188 , 189 The protein plays a role in the assembly and maturation of MHC‐I into the protein–peptide complex and the generation of effective cytotoxic T‐cell responses. 183 , 184 , 185 Calreticulin forms heterodimeric complexes with PDIA3, a thiol oxidoreductase, and together they assist in the biogenesis of MHC class I. Calreticulin is also a structural component of the peptide loading complex, which consists of the HC‐β2m heterodimer, calreticulin, and the additional components tapasin, transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP), and Bap31. 173 , 186 , 187 TAP provides a major source of peptides for MHC class I molecules, whereas tapasin, PDIA3, and calreticulin facilitate assembly of MHC class I molecules with peptides. 190 These important processes are Ca2+ sensitive and they depend on the presence of ER luminal Ca2+ supplied by calreticulin. Not surprisingly, MPN calreticulin C‐domain deletion mutants are functionally impaired in facilitating MHC‐I Class II or Class I assembly 188 , 189 and their interaction with PDIA3 and tapasin is also reduced. 188

6. CALRETICULIN, THE CA2+ HANDLING PROTEIN

Ca2+ is an important signalling molecule that has huge influence over nearly all cellular functions including gene expression, stress coping responses, motility, cell adhesion, muscle contraction, protein secretion, proliferation, apoptosis, cell metabolism and fertilization. 12 , 13 The success or failure to control Ca2+ homeostatic/signalling mechanisms have life or death consequences for the cell and the organism. Formation of intracellular Ca2+ stores, the source of immediately available Ca2+ to facilitate Ca2+ signalling and Ca2+‐dependent communication between intracellular organelles, is a decisive advantage making cells less dependent of the extracellular Ca2+. In the ER, calreticulin is intimately involved in integrating and coordinating many Ca2+‐dependent pathways in virtually all cellular compartments. 137 , 191 What distinguishes various cells and tissues are the specific mechanisms that regulate the initial extracellular Ca2+ influx and the intracellular Ca2+ mobilization. Importantly, these mechanisms are dependent on Ca2+ stores and Ca2+ storage/binding proteins. Calreticulin functions as a Ca2+ storage protein and, in turn, Ca2+ is dependent on calreticulin for maximal retention in the ER against continues flow of molecules and ions down the secretory pathway. Sometimes calreticulin can be found in intracellular organelles other than the ER where it manages Ca2+ to support specialized functions and heterogeneity of the CRN.

6.1. ER and Ca 2+ import, export and storage

Even though the total ER intraluminal Ca2+ concentration (includes free Ca2+ and Ca2+ bound to ER luminal resident proteins) is in excess of 2 mM, the free Ca2+ concentration is maintained within the 100–800 μM range but could increase to as high as 1000 μM under certain conditions. 191 , 192 , 193 , 194 , 195 , 196 The wide range of free ER luminal Ca2+ concentrations is interpreted as being due to methodological challenges associated with measuring organellar ion concentrations. However, it is also possible that this reflects the dynamic nature of Ca2+ concentration changes in the ER lumen driven by cellular Ca2+ needs and environmental conditions. The total Ca2+ concentration in the cytoplasm is also high (mM range), but in contrast to the ER lumen, the cytoplasmic free Ca2+ is maintained at <100 nM. 197 Once released from calreticulin, Ca2+ can move much easier in the ER lumen, 198 , 199 but in the cytosol Ca2+ is maintained under strict control, where it is bound to many high‐affinity Ca2+ binding proteins and cytoskeletal components. In the cytosol Ca2+ functions as universal signalling molecule that regulates many cellular processes, including cell proliferation, metabolism and apoptosis. 51 , 197 In the lumen of ER, Ca2+ also plays a signalling role in regulating protein synthesis, folding, posttranslational modification and trafficking. 109 , 191 , 200 , 201

Once accessed from calreticulin, Ca2+ is released from the ER (ER Ca 2+ export) via the inositol 1,4,5‐trisphosphate receptor (InsP3R)/Ca2+ channel or/and the ryanodine receptor/Ca2+ channel (RyR) (Figure 6). 12 , 13 , 202 , 203 The depletion of ER Ca2+ triggers Ca2+ entry from the extracellular space by store‐operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE), which plays a major role supplying Ca2+ for refilling of the ER Ca2+ store (ER Ca 2+ import) (Figure 6). 12 , 192 , 204 , 205 Stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1) is an ER membrane type 1 transmembrane protein that responds to reduced ER luminal Ca2+ concentration. 204 , 205 , 206 , 207 , 208 In the plasma membrane the two main Ca2+ influx channels are the ORAI and transient receptor potential channels (TRPC) that function in a STIM1‐dependent way. 209 Upon ER Ca2+ depletion (dissociation of Ca2+ from calreticulin), STIM1 clusters move towards the plasma membrane containing ORAI1 and TRPC and form membrane contacts to activate SOCE. 139 , 205 , 208 , 209 The sarco‐endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA) pumps Ca2+ from the cytosol into the ER for storage bound to calreticulin (ER Ca 2+ import) (Figure 6). 12 , 13 The calreticulin mutant expressed in MPN cells causes abnormal regulation of SOCE 206 accounting for dysregulated Ca2+ fluxes in MPN cells. 119 It is not surprising cells expressing MPN variants of calreticulin have increased cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations. 111

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

ER, calreticulin's ‘domicile’. Calreticulin is an ER‐resident Ca2+ binding/storage protein. Ca2+ can be easily and rapidly released from calreticulin to other Ca2+ handling proteins. Ca2+ managed by calreticulin plays a signalling role and supports many protein–protein, chaperone–client interactions, as well as impacting stress responses and regulation of the UPR (stress coping response). In cells STIM1/ORAI1/TRPC together with SERCA are responsible for Ca2+ import to the ER whereas InsP3R and RyR play a role in Ca2+ export from the ER. There are cases when calreticulin can be found outside the ER but how calreticulin exits the ER remains to be established. ATF6, activating transcription factor 6; Calr, calreticulin; Canx, calnexin; CypB, peptidylprolyl isomerase B; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; InsP3R, inositol trisphosphate receptor/Ca2+ channel; IRE1α, inositol‐requiring enzyme 1α; ORAI1, Ca2+ release‐activated Ca2+ channel protein 1; PERK, protein kinase RNA‐like endoplasmic reticulum kinase; PDI, protein disulphide isomerase RyR, ryanodine receptor/Ca2+ channel; SERCA; sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+‐ATPase; SOCE, store‐operated Ca2+ entry; STIM1, stromal interaction molecule 1; UPR, unfolded protein response; TRPC, transient receptor potential channel.

Over 50% of Ca2+ stored in the ER is bound to calreticulin (ER Ca 2+ storage). 18 , 34 , 93 , 210 In addition, the ER lumen contains other Ca2+ binding‐resident chaperones (GRP94, BiP/GRP78) and folding enzymes 18 , 19 but these proteins cannot substitute for calreticulin as a Ca2+source as they bind less Ca2+ and are engaged in other specialized activities in the ER. However, calreticulin can hold large amounts of Ca2+ (‘calreticulin Ca2+ pool’) and depending on cellular needs Ca2+ can be easily and rapidly released from the protein to other Ca2+ handling proteins making calreticulin an ideal protein for regulating the activities of Ca2+‐dependent cellular processes. 18 , 19 , 211 , 212 For example, increase in the abundance of calreticulin Ca2+ pool is vital for repetitive InsP3‐induced Ca2+ waves (Ca2+ export). 213 Calreticulin also regulates SERCA2b function (Ca2+ import) either directly 214 or via complex formation with PDIA3. 215 Increased expression of calreticulin (increased calreticulin ER Ca2+ pool) has inhibitory effect on SOCE (Ca2+ import). 216 , 217 Furthermore, Ca2+ entry from the extracellular space via SOCE (Ca2+ import) is modulated by PDIA3 binding to STIM1 218 , 219 and calreticulin interacts with PDIA3 in a Ca2+‐ and calreticulin conformation‐dependent manner. 102 , 200 Importantly, depending on the environmental conditions, Ca2+ is released from calreticulin when the protein undergoes conformational changes and ‘senses’ fluctuations in the ER luminal Ca2+ concentration due to active Ca2+ export/import and/or when calreticulin interacts with client proteins, chaperones, folding enzymes or Ca2+ handling proteins such as InsP3R, STIM1 or SERCA.

The ER is heterogeneous with respect to the distribution of Ca2+ handling proteins (Ca2+ pumps, Ca2+ release channels) 220 and calreticulin delivers Ca2+ needed to maintain the functional heterogeneity of the ER Ca2+ access to Ca2+ handling proteins and organelles in the CRN. Finally, by handling the ER luminal Ca2+, calreticulin prevents Ca2+ misuse that results in altered cell shape, cell motility, cell proliferation, membrane damage, mitochondrial calcification, impaired energy metabolism, improper folding of proteins and cell death.

6.2. Calreticulin, Ca 2+ and ER stress

The ER plays a central role in managing cellular stress via mobilization of ER stress‐coping responses, such as the UPR. The UPR is comprised of three signalling arms controlled by ER‐associated integral membrane stress sensor proteins: the ER kinase dsRNA‐activated protein kinase‐like ER kinase (PERK), activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) and the serine/threonine‐protein kinase/endoribonuclease inositol‐requiring enzyme 1α (IRE1α) (Figure 6). These stress sensors bind the ER lumen chaperone BiP/GRP78 and under stress conditions BiP/GRP78 dissociates from IRE1α, PERK and ATF6 resulting in activation of UPR. There are two isoforms of ATF6, ATF6α and ATF6β, with ATF6α playing a primary role in the UPR. Interestingly, calreticulin gene is a target of ATF6β in the central nervous system. 221 , 222 The ATF6β‐dependent regulation of expression of calreticulin plays crucial role in neuronal survival under ER stress by improving intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis. 221 , 222 This further supports a notion that UPR signalling is designed to increase the expression of protein chaperones including calreticulin resulting in increased ER Ca2+ capacity. 57 , 221 , 222 Concomitant with this is increase in a number of ER‐mitochondrial contact sites, 223 , 224 promoting transfer of Ca2+ accumulated in the ER due to increase in calreticulin Ca2+ pool, to mitochondria in exchange for ATP. 223 , 224 Calreticulin role in maintaining high ER Ca2+ capacity is, therefore, vital in supporting energy production especially during times of cellular stress. Upregulation of the calreticulin gene expression at the time of cellular stress is a clever strategy to maintain high ER Ca2+ capacity which is central for successful UPR coping responses.

6.3. Calreticulin versus calsequestrin

In the skeletal and cardiac muscle, the majority of the ER membrane is organized into highly specialized membrane network referred to as sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) responsible for handling Ca2+ for the muscle contraction and relaxation. Functionally, muscle cells, just like any other cell, also contain conventional ER membranes equipped with and responsible for common cellular functions. 2 In muscle SR, calsequestrin is the major Ca2+ binding/storage protein, and is localized to the junctional SR where it functions as the source of Ca2+ for released by RyR to trigger muscle contraction. 202 , 218 , 225 , 226 , 227 There are two isoforms of calsequestrin encoded by different genes, namely CASQ1 and CASQ2. 225 The N‐terminal region of calsequestrin contains three domains with high structural similarity to the thioredoxin fold found in PDI‐like proteins (Figure 7), 225 , 228 and is distinct from the 3D structure of the N + P‐domain of calreticulin (Figure 7). Although the N‐terminal domains of calreticulin and calsequestrin are unique to each protein, both calreticulin and calsequestrin share amino acid sequence similarities in their C‐terminal domains responsible for high‐capacity Ca2+ binding (Figure 7). Calsequestrin is designed to store Ca2+ in the junctional SR and plays a limited role confined to support of muscle excitation–contraction coupling. 225 The protein localization in muscle cells is restricted to the junctional SR due to oligomerization 225 , 229 , 230 and binding to the junctional SR proteins including RyR, triadin, junctin, IRE1α. 225 In contrast, calreticulin is strategically positioned in the lumen of the ER in all cells (including muscle cells) from where the protein manages access to and distribution of Ca2+ for not just one but many cellular Ca2+‐signalling events. Thus, muscle cells differ from many cells because they express two high‐capacity Ca2+ binding proteins (calreticulin and calsequestrin) and, consequently, muscle cells contain two large and distinct pools of organellar Ca2+: calreticulin Ca2+ pool and calsequestrin Ca2+ pool (discussed below).

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Calreticulin and calsequestrin. Calreticulin (A) and calsequestrin (Casq2) (B) are major Ca2+ binding proteins in the lumen of the ER and the junctional SR, respectively. The proteins share amino acid sequence similarities of their unstructured and flexible C‐terminal domains responsible for high‐capacity Ca2+ binding. Three thioredoxin fold domains of calsequestrin are indicated in the Figure (domains I, II, III). The N‐terminal regions of calreticulin (A) and calsequestrin (B) are unique for each protein. Calreticulin model is based on PDB ID:1HHN, PDB ID:3POW. Calsequestrin model based on PDB ID:2VAF.

7. CALRETICULIN CA2+ POOL: LESSONS FROM THE HEART

Another major advance in calreticulin research was the creation of the calreticulin‐deficient mouse model. 2 , 93 This was the first animal model with targeted inactivation of a gene encoding an ER luminal protein. In mice, calreticulin deficiency is lethal at embryonic day 18.5 due to impaired development of the ventricular wall and septum. 93 , 231 , 232 This was initially unexpected and showed the importance of calreticulin in cardiac function and development. Two decades of studying calreticulin in the heart very well illustrate and exemplify the concept of co‐dependence between calreticulin and Ca2+.

7.1. Loss of calreticulin Ca 2+ pool in the heart

Cardiac development is a well‐controlled molecular and morphogenetic event where Ca2+ plays an important signalling role that affects many transcriptional processes during cardiogenesis. 233 , 234 Any perturbations of Ca2+‐dependent signalling pathways can have devastating consequences in the form of congenital heart disease. 233

The whole body inactivation of calreticulin gene in mice is embryonic lethal at E18.5. 93 , 231 In vitro and in vivo biochemical, cell biological and animal studies of calreticulin indicate that Ca2+ handling by calreticulin is the key cause of embryonic lethality of calreticulin‐deficient mice. 93 , 235 Since Ca2+‐dependent transcriptional mechanisms play crucial roles during cardiac development and pathology, 233 , 234 , 236 , 237 we tested whether loss of the calreticulin Ca2+ pool in cardiomyocytes is responsible for embryonic lethality in the absence of calreticulin. This idea was validated by the creation of a ‘rescue’ mouse model with cardiac‐specific expression of a constitutively active form of calcineurin. 235 , 238 Calcineurin is a strictly Ca2+‐dependent serine/threonine phosphatase that regulates the activity of transcription factor NF‐AT. Increased expression of calcineurin in cardiomyocytes results in cardiac hypertrophy. 239 Sustained Ca2+ release from the ER is required to activate calcineurin phosphatase activity, 240 but deletion of the C‐terminal domain of calcineurin produces a constitutively active phosphatase even in the absence of Ca2+ release from the ER. 241 Expression of constitutively active calcineurin in calreticulin‐deficient cardiomyocytes rescued Calr −/− mice from embryonic lethality 235 indicating an essential role for the calreticulin Ca2+ pool in Ca2+‐dependent transcriptional events during cardiac development. 232 , 235 , 238 , 242 , 243 This remarkable finding illustrates a key role of calreticulin in managing the Ca2+ pool required in regulating Ca2+‐dependent transcriptional pathways. Additional studies demonstrated that calreticulin similarly plays a role in the transcription of genes regulated by glucocorticoid receptor and other nuclear hormone receptors, 244 , 245 , 246 , 247 , 248 extending calreticulin influence beyond the ER and impacting on many cellular functions.

CALRdel52, the calreticulin gene variant associated with MPN has all the negative charges of the calreticulin Ca2+ binding C‐domain converted to positive charges thus influencing the ER calreticulin Ca2+ pool. 94 , 95 Not surprisingly, replacement of the wild‐type calreticulin gene by knock‐in of the CALRdel52 variant in all cells in mice (loss of calreticulin Ca2+ pool) results in embryonic lethality 110 thus validating the original finding that the loss of calreticulin Ca2+ pool in cardiomyocytes is responsible for embryonic lethality. 93 , 235 Taken together, these findings firmly establish that calreticulin Ca2+ pool is well integrated into Ca2+‐dependent transcriptional events. Importantly, the loss of high‐capacity Ca2+ binding to calreticulin and consequently the loss of the calreticulin ER Ca2+ pool makes the protein functionally ineffective and leads to pathology.

7.2. Increased calreticulin Ca 2+ pool in the heart

Although the abundance of calreticulin and the size of the calreticulin Ca2+ pool is initially is highly in the embryonic heart, the abundance of calreticulin and concomitantly the size of the calreticulin Ca2+ pool, sharply decreases in postnatal and adult cardiomyocytes. 93 This turns out to be important for the development of cardiac conductive system because maintaining a high level of calreticulin Ca2+ pool in the postnatal heart results in impaired systolic function, sinus bradycardia and prolonged atrioventricular (AV) node dysfunction with progressive prolongation of the P‐R interval that result in complete heart block and sudden death in mice. 249 This is reminiscent of a complete heart block seen in children. 250 Furthermore, in the embryonic stem (ES) cell model of cardiogenesis the increasing calreticulin Ca2+ pool or knocking‐down the InsP3R/Ca2+ channel (Ca2+ export protein) prevents proper development of ES‐derived pacemaker cells. 236 Thus, the role of calreticulin in delivering Ca2+ to the InsP3R is essential for proper development of pacemaker activity during early cardiogenesis and foetal life.

The increased of the calreticulin Ca2+ pool in the adult heart enhances mechanical work potential of cardiomyocytes and activates the IRE1α branch of the UPR all leading to cardiac fibrosis and heart failure. 251 , 252 Increased mechanical work of cardiomyocytes triggers activation of UPR in cardiac fibroblasts leading to fibrosis and cardiac remodelling. 252 Remarkably, blocking the activation of the UPR pathway by tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA) prevents cardiac fibrosis. 246 The mechanisms of action of TUDCA on UPR signalling are not well understood but likely involve TUDCA‐dependent alteration of cellular and/or ER Ca2+ (managed by calreticulin). 253 , 254 , 255

7.3. Calreticulin Ca 2+ pool versus calsequestrin Ca 2+ pool

Cardiac and skeletal muscle are both highly specialized tissues sustaining mechanical function of muscle. Muscle contraction is triggered by Ca2+ release from the junctional SR. The SR membrane contains a number of highly specialized Ca2+ handling proteins, including calsequestrin, supporting exclusively muscle excitation–contraction coupling. Muscle cells also contain functional ER (calreticulin domicile) associated with house‐keeping jobs such as Ca2+ and transcriptional signalling, protein quality control, lipid metabolism and ER stress responses, to name a few. 2 Thus, it is entirely predictable that loss of the ER‐associated calreticulin Ca2+ pool in cardiomyocytes explains impairment of heart development and embryonic lethality. 93 , 231 In contrast mice lacking cardiac calsequestrin (loss of the SR calsequestrin‐associated Ca2+ pool) are viable and fertile but only manifest dysfunction in RyR2 channel and conduction abnormalities. 256 , 257 This further illustrates that cardiomyocytes not only have two functionally distinct membrane systems (ER and SR) 2 but most importantly they have two functionally different Ca2+ pools; one highly specialized calsequestrin Ca2+ pool (driving excitation–contraction coupling) and an ER calreticulin Ca2+ pool that is responsible for handling many Ca2+‐dependent cellular processes (transcription, stress responses, protein quality control and turnover, lipid metabolism).

In summary, one lesson from the heart is that cardiac cells are unique because there is functional compartmentalization of Ca2+ in cardiomyocytes with the SR Ca2+ being specialized for muscle mechanical function and the ER Ca2+, handled by calreticulin for general cellular functions. Calsequestrin Ca2+ pool evolved as Ca2+ pool dedicated to supply Ca2+ for excitation–contraction coupling. Another lesson from the heart is that the Ca2+ pool under the control of calreticulin is not only essential for cardiogenesis and development of muscle conductive system, but most importantly, it impacts on cells Ca2+ and transcriptional signalling, protein quality control, energy metabolism and ER stress responses. The calreticulin Ca2+ pool must be tightly controlled as any increase or decrease in calreticulin Ca2+ pool results in pathologies.

8. CONCLUDING THOUGHTS

Ca2+ has emerged through evolution as a ubiquitous signalling molecule and integral part of the physiology and biology of the organism. Eukaryotic cells developed Ca2+ stores system of the ER, which serves as an internally controlled source of Ca2+ for organellar and cellular communications, essential for survival. The story of calreticulin begun over 40 years ago with a question: how is Ca2+ handled in the lumen of the ER? This led to the discovery of calreticulin, a protein that today is universally accepted as the major Ca2+ handling protein in all cells that have ER. Over three decades of studying calreticulin demonstrates that calreticulin plays the role of the ER Ca2+ gatekeeper (Figure 8). Both the role of calreticulin as the ER Ca2+ gatekeeper and the interdependence of calreticulin and Ca2+ form the foundation of ER Ca2+ signalling and, therefore, influences many cellular processes (Figure 8). The protein maintains ER Ca2+ supply under different physiological conditions, manages access to Ca2+, how Ca2+ is used depending on the environmental events, and makes sure Ca2+ is not misused. The ER is an extensive network of membranes that occupies a major proportion of the CRN, and calreticulin, as the ER Ca2+ gatekeeper, partitions Ca2+ to different regions of the CRN for many cellular functions and needs. This explains why calreticulin turns up in numerous studies involving cell function.

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

Calreticulin as the ER Ca2+ gatekeeper. As the Ca2+ gatekeeper calreticulin maintains ER Ca2+ supply, manages access to Ca2+ and how Ca2+ is used. Ca2+ is supplied to the ER from the extracellular space and cytoplasm by combined action of SOCE and SERCA. Depending on the environmental conditions/cellular needs Ca2+ is released from the Ca2+ gatekeeper calreticulin to manage ER ‘local’ events or other needed ‘services’ including stress responses, energy metabolism and cellular and organellar communication.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Marek Michalak: Conceptualization (lead); data curation (lead); formal analysis (lead); funding acquisition (lead); investigation (lead); project administration (lead); visualization (lead); writing – original draft (lead); writing – review and editing (lead).

FUNDING INFORMATION

Research in our laboratory is supported by a generous donation from the Kenneth and Sheelagh McCourt family; University Hospital Foundation; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Natural Sciences & Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Foundation for Innovation; Multiple Sclerosis Society; Women and Children's Health Research Institute; SynAD.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The author declares no conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I am grateful to past and present members of our laboratory with whom I have had the pleasure to enjoy the calreticulin journey. They have greatly contributed to the advancement of our knowledge of calreticulin biology and beyond. Thanks to all calreticulinologists around the world for your support of the biennial International Calreticulin Workshops running strong since 1994. Thanks to David J. Tester and Michael J. Ackerman (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota) for sharing information on calreticulin mutants identified in sudden unexpected death patients. Thanks to Alexej Verkhratsky for thoughtful and stimulating comments. I thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions. I am extremely grateful to Luis B. Agellon, a dear friend and an individual with a brilliant mind. This review would have not been possible without his unconditional support, encouragement and thought‐provoking endless Zoom sessions.

Michalak M. Calreticulin: Endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ gatekeeper. J Cell Mol Med. 2024;28:e17839. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.17839

Dedicated to Tullio Pozzan, my dear friend, brilliant scientist, and extraordinary human being.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Not applicable

REFERENCES

  • 1. Ostwald TJ, MacLennan DH, Dorrington KJ. Effects of cation binding on the conformation of calsequestrin and the high affinity calcium‐binding protein of sarcoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem. 1974;249:5867‐5871. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Michalak M, Opas M. Endoplasmic and sarcoplasmic reticulum in the heart. Trends Cell Biol. 2009;19(6):253‐259. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2009.03.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Fliegel L, Burns K, Opas M, Michalak M. The high‐affinity calcium binding protein of sarcoplasmic reticulum. Tissue distribution, and homology with calregulin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1989;982:1‐8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Fliegel L, Burns K, MacLennan DH, Reithmeier RAF, Michalak M. Molecular cloning of the high affinity calcium‐binding protein (calreticulin) of skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:21522‐21528. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Michalak M, Milner RE. Calreticulin: a functional analogue of calsequestrin. Basic App Myol. 1991;1:121‐128. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Michalak M, Baksh S, Opas M. Identification and immunolocalization of calreticulin in pancreatic cells: no evidence for "calciosomes". Exp Cell Res. 1991;197:91‐99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Milner RE, Baksh S, Shemanko C, et al. Calreticulin, and not calsequestrin, is the major calcium binding protein of smooth muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum and liver endoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:7155‐7165. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Smith MJ, Koch GL. Multiple zones in the sequence of calreticulin (CRP55, calregulin, HACBP), a major calcium binding ER/SR protein. EMBO J. 1989;8(12):3581‐3586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Lewis MJ, Sweet DJ, Pelham HR. The ERD2 gene determines the specificity of the luminal ER protein retention system. Cell. 1990;61(7):1359‐1363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Lewis MJ, Pelham HR. A human homologue of the yeast HDEL receptor. Nature. 1990;348(6297):162‐163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Semenza JC, Hardwick KG, Dean N, Pelham HR. ERD2, a yeast gene required for the receptor‐mediated retrieval of luminal ER proteins from the secretory pathway. Cell. 1990;61(7):1349‐1357. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90698-e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Krebs J, Agellon LB, Michalak M. Ca2+ homeostasis and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress: an integrated view of calcium signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;460(1):114‐121. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Berridge MJ. The inositol trisphosphate/calcium signaling pathway in health and disease. Physiol Rev. 2016;96(4):1261‐1296. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00006.2016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Putney JW. Forms and functions of store‐operated calcium entry mediators, STIM and Orai. Adv Biol Regul. 2018;68:88‐96. doi: 10.1016/j.jbior.2017.11.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Rizzuto R, Pozzan T. Microdomains of intracellular Ca2+: molecular determinants and functional consequences. Physiol Rev. 2006;86(1):369‐408. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00004.2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Carafoli E, Krebs J. Why calcium? How calcium became the best communicator. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(40):20849‐20857. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R116.735894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Michalak M, Groenendyk J, Szabo E, Gold LI, Opas M. Calreticulin, a multi‐process calcium‐buffering chaperone of the endoplasmic reticulum. Biochem J. 2009;417(3):651‐666. doi: 10.1042/BJ20081847 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Dai N, Groenendyk J, Michalak M. Binding Proteins | Ca2+ Binding/Buffering Proteins: ER Luminal Proteins. Encycl Biol Chem. 2021;3:534‐546. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.21377-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Wang WA, Agellon LB, Michalak M. Organellar calcium handling in the cellular reticular network. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2019;11(12):a038265. 10.1101/cshperspect.a038265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Hebert DN, Molinari M. In and out of the ER: protein folding, quality control, degradation, and related human diseases. Physiol Rev. 2007;87(4):1377‐1408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Tannous A, Pisoni GB, Hebert DN, Molinari M. N‐linked sugar‐regulated protein folding and quality control in the ER. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2015;41:79‐89. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.12.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Maattanen P, Gehring K, Bergeron JJ, Thomas DY. Protein quality control in the ER: the recognition of misfolded proteins. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2010;21(5):500‐511. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2010.03.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Maattanen P, Kozlov G, Gehring K, Thomas DY. ERp57 and PDI: multifunctional protein disulfide isomerases with similar domain architectures but differing substrate‐partner associations. Biochem Cell Biol. 2006;84(6):881‐889. doi: 10.1139/o06-186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Kozlov G, Maattanen P, Thomas DY, Gehring K. A structural overview of the PDI family of proteins. FEBS J. 2010;277(19):3924‐3936. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07793.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Chevet E, Smirle J, Cameron PH, Thomas DY, Bergeron JJ. Calnexin phosphorylation: linking cytoplasmic signalling to endoplasmic reticulum lumenal functions. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2010;21(5):486‐490. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Cahu X, Constantinescu SN. Oncogenic drivers in myeloproliferative neoplasms: from JAK2 to Calreticulin mutations. Curr Hematol Malig rep. 2015;10(4):335‐343. doi: 10.1007/s11899-015-0278-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Smirle J, Au CE, Jain M, Dejgaard K, Nilsson T, Bergeron J. Cell biology of the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi apparatus through proteomics. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013;5(1):a015073. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a015073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Fucikova J, Spisek R, Kroemer G, Galluzzi L. Calreticulin and cancer. Cell Res. 2021;31(1):5‐16. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0383-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. How J, Hobbs GS, Mullally A. Mutant calreticulin in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2019;134(25):2242‐2248. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019000622 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Gold LI, Eggleton P, Sweetwyne MT, et al. Calreticulin: non‐endoplasmic reticulum functions in physiology and disease. FASEB J. 2010;24(3):665‐683. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-145482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Pizzo P, Pozzan T. Mitochondria‐endoplasmic reticulum choreography: structure and signaling dynamics. Trends Cell Biol. 2007;17(10):511‐517. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2007.07.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Johnson JD, Chang JP. Function‐ and agonist‐specific Ca2+ signalling: the requirement for and mechanism of spatial and temporal complexity in Ca2+ signals. Biochem Cell Biol. 2000;78(3):217‐240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Reddish FN, Miller CL, Gorkhali R, Yang JJ. Calcium dynamics mediated by the endoplasmic/sarcoplasmic reticulum and related diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(5):1024. doi: 10.3390/ijms18051024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Groenendyk J, Agellon LB, Michalak M. Calcium signaling and endoplasmic reticulum stress. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2021;363:1‐20. doi: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2021.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Lu YC, Weng WC, Lee H. Functional roles of calreticulin in cancer biology. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:526524. doi: 10.1155/2015/526524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Varricchio L, Falchi M, Dall'Ora M, et al. Calreticulin: challenges posed by the intrinsically disordered nature of Calreticulin to the study of its function. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2017;5:96. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2017.00096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Jia XY, He LH, Jing RL, Li RZ. Calreticulin: conserved protein and diverse functions in plants. Physiol Plant. 2009;136(2):127‐138. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2009.1223.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Kozlov G, Gehring K. Calnexin cycle – structural features of the ER chaperone system. FEBS J. 2020;287(20):4322‐4340. doi: 10.1111/febs.15330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Harada Y, Ohkawa Y, Maeda K, Taniguchi N. Glycan quality control in and out of the endoplasmic reticulum of mammalian cells. FEBS J. 2021;289(22):7147‐7162. doi: 10.1111/febs.16185 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Braakman I, Hebert DN. Protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013;5(5):a013201. 10.1101/cshperspect.a013201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Eisner DA, Caldwell JL, Kistamas K, Trafford AW. Calcium and excitation‐contraction coupling in the heart. Circ Res. 2017;121(2):181‐195. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.310230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Jiang Y, Tao Z, Chen H, Xia S. Endoplasmic reticulum quality control in immune cells. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:740653. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.740653 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Groenendyk J, Agellon LB, Michalak M. Coping with endoplasmic reticulum stress in the cardiovascular system. Annu Rev Physiol. 2013;75:49‐67. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Hetz C, Zhang K, Kaufman RJ. Mechanisms, regulation and functions of the unfolded protein response. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(8):421‐438. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0250-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Kielbik M, Szulc‐Kielbik I, Klink M. Calreticulin‐multifunctional chaperone in immunogenic cell death: potential significance as a prognostic biomarker in ovarian cancer patients. Cells. 2021;10(1):130. doi: 10.3390/cells10010130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Padovani C, Jevtic P, Rape M. Quality control of protein complex composition. Mol Cell. 2022;82:1439‐1450. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.02.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Verkhratsky A. Calcium and cell death. Subcell Biochem. 2007;45:465‐480. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6191-2_17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Wei C, Wang X, Zheng M, Cheng H. Calcium gradients underlying cell migration. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2012;24(2):254‐261. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2011.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Hernandez‐Ochoa EO, Pratt SJP, Lovering RM, Schneider MF. Critical role of intracellular RyR1 calcium release channels in skeletal muscle function and disease. Front Physiol. 2015;6:420. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Qiu R, Lewis RS. Structural features of STIM and Orai underlying store‐operated calcium entry. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2019;57:90‐98. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2018.12.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Verkhratsky A. Physiology and pathophysiology of the calcium store in the endoplasmic reticulum of neurons. Physiol Rev. 2005;85(1):201‐279. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00004.2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Persson S, Rosenquist M, Sommarin M. Identification of a novel calreticulin isoform (Crt2) in human and mouse. Gene. 2002;297(1–2):151‐158. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(02)00880-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Persson S, Rosenquist M, Svensson K, Galvao R, Boss WF, Sommarin M. Phylogenetic analyses and expression studies reveal two distinct groups of calreticulin isoforms in higher plants. Plant Physiol. 2003;133(3):1385‐1396. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.024943 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Xiang Y, Lu YH, Song M, et al. Overexpression of a Triticum aestivum Calreticulin gene (TaCRT1) improves salinity tolerance in tobacco. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0140591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Joshi R, Paul M, Kumar A, Pandey D. Role of calreticulin in biotic and abiotic stress signalling and tolerance mechanisms in plants. Gene. 2019;714:144004. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2019.144004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. McCauliffe DP, Yang YS, Wilson J, Sontheimer RD, Capra JD. The 5′‐flanking region of the human calreticulin gene shares homology with the human GRP78, GRP94, and protein disulfide isomerase promoters. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:2557‐2562. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Waser M, Mesaeli N, Spencer C, Michalak M. Regulation of calreticulin gene expression by calcium. J Cell Biol. 1997;138:547‐557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Qiu Y, Michalak M. Transcriptional control of the calreticulin gene in health and disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2009;41(3):531‐538. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2008.06.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Paskevicius T, Farraj RA, Michalak M, Agellon LB. Calnexin, more than just a molecular chaperone. Cell. 2023;12(3):403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Tjoelker LW, Seyfried CE, Eddy RL Jr, et al. Human, mouse, and rat calnexin cDNA cloning: identification of potential calcium binding motifs and gene localization to human chromosome 5. Biochemistry. 1994;33(11):3229‐3236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Muller‐Taubenberger A, Lupas AN, Li H, Ecke M, Simmeth E, Gerisch G. Calreticulin and calnexin in the endoplasmic reticulum are important for phagocytosis. EMBO J. 2001;20(23):6772‐6782. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.23.6772 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Kozlov G, Pocanschi CL, Rosenauer A, et al. Structural basis of carbohydrate recognition by calreticulin. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(49):38612‐38620. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.168294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Chouquet A, Paidassi H, Ling WL, et al. X‐ray structure of the human calreticulin globular domain reveals a peptide‐binding area and suggests a multi‐molecular mechanism. PLoS One. 2011;6(3):e17886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017886 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Ellgaard L, Riek R, Herrmann T, et al. NMR structure of the calreticulin P‐domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(6):3133‐3138. doi: 10.1073/pnas.051630098 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Blees A, Januliene D, Hofmann T, et al. Structure of the human MHC‐I peptide‐loading complex. Nature. 2017;551(7681):525‐528. doi: 10.1038/nature24627 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Martin V, Groenendyk J, Steiner SS, et al. Identification by mutational analysis of amino acid residues essential in the chaperone function of calreticulin. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(4):2338‐2346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Frickel EM, Riek R, Jelesarov I, Helenius A, Wuthrich K, Ellgaard L. TROSY‐NMR reveals interaction between ERp57 and the tip of the calreticulin P‐domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:1954‐1959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Leach MR, Cohen‐Doyle MF, Thomas DY, Williams DB. Localization of the lectin, ERp57 binding, and polypeptide binding sites of Calnexin and Calreticulin. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(33):29686‐29697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Pallero MA, Elzie CA, Chen J, Mosher DF, Murphy‐Ullrich JE. Thrombospondin 1 binding to calreticulin‐LRP1 signals resistance to anoikis. FASEB J. 2008;22(11):3968‐3979. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-104802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Yang H, Ahmad ZA, Song Y. Molecular insight for the role of key residues of calreticulin in its binding activities: a computational study. Comput Biol Chem. 2020;85:107228. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2020.107228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Ciplys E, Paskevicius T, Zitkus E, et al. Mapping human calreticulin regions important for structural stability. Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom. 2021;1869(11):140710. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2021.140710 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Boelt SG, Norn C, Rasmussen MI, et al. Mapping the Ca2+ induced structural change in calreticulin. J Proteomics. 2016;142:138‐148. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2016.05.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Schrag JD, Bergeron JJ, Li Y, et al. The structure of calnexin, an ER chaperone involved in quality control of protein folding. Mol Cell. 2001;8(3):633‐644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Baksh S, Spamer C, Oikawa K, et al. Zn2+ binding to cardiac calsequestrin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995;209(1):310‐315. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Kapoor M, Ellgaard L, Gopalakrishnapai J, et al. Mutational analysis provides molecular insight into the carbohydrate‐binding region of calreticulin: pivotal roles of tyrosine‐109 and aspartate‐135 in carbohydrate recognition. Biochemistry. 2004;43(1):97‐106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Clare DK, Saibil HR. ATP‐driven molecular chaperone machines. Biopolymers. 2013;99(11):846‐859. doi: 10.1002/bip.22361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Sucec I, Bersch B, Schanda P. How do chaperones bind (partly) unfolded client proteins? Front Mol Biosci. 2021;8:762005. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.762005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Saito Y, Ihara Y, Leach MR, Cohen‐Doyle MF, Williams DB. Calreticulin functions in vitro as a molecular chaperone for both glycosylated and non‐glycosylated proteins. EMBO J. 1999;18:6718‐6729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Corbett EF, Michalak KM, Oikawa K, et al. The conformation of calreticulin is influenced by the endoplasmic reticulum lumenal environment. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:27177‐27185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Wijeyesakere SJ, Gagnon JK, Arora K, Brooks CL III, Raghavan M. Regulation of calreticulin‐major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I interactions by ATP. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(41):E5608‐E5617. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510132112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Ihara Y, Cohen‐Doyle MF, Saito Y, Williams DB. Calnexin discriminates between protein conformational states and functions as a molecular chaperone in vitro. Mol Cell. 1999;4:331‐341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Brockmeier A, Williams DB. Potent lectin‐independent chaperone function of calnexin under conditions prevalent within the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum. Biochemistry. 2006;45(42):12906‐12916. doi: 10.1021/bi0614378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Elliott JG, Oliver JD, High S. The thiol‐dependent reductase ERp57 interacts specifically with N‐ glycosylated integral membrane proteins. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:13849‐13855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Oliver JD, van der Wal FJ, Bulleid NJ, High S. Interaction of the thiol‐dependent reductase ERp57 with nascent glycoproteins. Science. 1997;275:86‐88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Kozlov G, Munoz‐Escobar J, Castro K, Gehring K. Mapping the ER Interactome: the P domains of Calnexin and Calreticulin as Plurivalent adapters for Foldases and chaperones. Structure. 2017;25(9):1415‐1422.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2017.07.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Kozlov G, Bastos‐Aristizabal S, Maattanen P, et al. Structural basis of cyclophilin B binding by the calnexin/calreticulin P‐domain. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(46):35551‐35557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Ishikawa Y, Vranka JA, Boudko SP, et al. Mutation in cyclophilin B that causes hyperelastosis cutis in American quarter horse does not affect peptidylprolyl cis‐trans isomerase activity but shows altered cyclophilin B‐protein interactions and affects collagen folding. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(26):22253‐22265. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.333336 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Andrin C, Pinkoski MJ, Burns K, et al. Interaction between a Ca2+‐binding protein calreticulin and perforin, a component of the cytotoxic T‐cell granules. Biochemistry. 1998;37:10386‐10394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Fraser SA, Michalak M, Welch WH, Hudig D. Calreticulin, a component of the endoplasmic reticulum and of cytotoxic lymphocyte granules, regulates perforin‐mediated lysis in the hemolytic model system. Biochem Cell Biol. 1998;76:881‐887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Fraser SA, Karimi R, Michalak M, Hudig D. Perforin lytic activity is controlled by calreticulin. J Immunol. 2000;164(8):4150‐4155. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.8.4150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Nakamura K, Zuppini A, Arnaudeau S, et al. Functional specialization of calreticulin domains. J Cell Biol. 2001;154(5):961‐972. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200102073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Baksh S, Michalak M. Expression of calreticulin in Escherichia coli and identification of its Ca2+ binding domains. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:21458‐21465. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Mesaeli N, Nakamura K, Zvaritch E, et al. Calreticulin is essential for cardiac development. J Cell Biol. 1999;144:857‐868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Klampfl T, Gisslinger H, Harutyunyan AS, et al. Somatic mutations of calreticulin in myeloproliferative neoplasms. New Engl J Med. 2013;369(25):2379‐2390. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1311347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Nangalia J, Massie CE, Baxter EJ, et al. Somatic CALR mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms with nonmutated JAK2. New Engl J Med. 2013;369(25):2391‐2405. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1312542 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Li J, Prins D, Park HJ, et al. Mutant calreticulin knockin mice develop thrombocytosis and myelofibrosis without a stem cell self‐renewal advantage. Blood. 2018;131(6):649‐661. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-09-806356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Bergeron JJ, Brenner MB, Thomas DY, Williams DB. Calnexin: a membrane‐bound chaperone of the endoplasmic reticulum. Trends Biochem Sci. 1994;19(3):124‐128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Michalak M, Corbett EF, Mesaeli N, Nakamura K, Opas M. Calreticulin: one protein, one gene, many functions. Biochem J. 1999;344:281‐292. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Villamil Giraldo AM, Lopez Medus M, Gonzalez Lebrero M, et al. The structure of calreticulin C‐terminal domain is modulated by physiological variations of calcium concentration. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(7):4544‐4553. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.034512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Migliaccio AR, Uversky VN. Dissecting physical structure of calreticulin, an intrinsically disordered Ca2+‐buffering chaperone from endoplasmic reticulum. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2018;36(6):1617‐1636. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2017.1330224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Papadopoulos N, Nedelec A, Derenne A, et al. Oncogenic CALR mutant C‐terminus mediates dual binding to the thrombopoietin receptor triggering complex dimerization and activation. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):1881. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37277-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Corbett EF, Michalak KM, Oikawa K, et al. The conformation of calreticulin is influenced by the endoplasmic reticulum luminal environment. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(35):27177‐27185. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M002049200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Baksh S, Spamer C, Heilmann C, Michalak M. Identification of the Zn2+ binding region in calreticulin. FEBS Lett. 1995;376:53‐57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Li Z, Stafford WF, Bouvier M. The metal ion binding properties of calreticulin modulate its conformational flexibility and thermal stability. Biochemistry. 2001;40:11193‐11201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Tan Y, Chen M, Li Z, Mabuchi K, Bouvier M. The calcium‐ and zinc‐responsive regions of calreticulin reside strictly in the N‐/C‐domain. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1760(5):745‐753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Brecker M, Khakhina S, Schubert TJ, Thompson Z, Rubenstein RC. The probable, possible, and novel functions of ERp29. Front Physiol. 2020;11:574339. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.574339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Viviano J, Brecker M, Ferrara‐Cook C, Suaud L, Rubenstein RC. ERp29 as a regulator of insulin biosynthesis. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0233502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Terajima M, Taga Y, Cabral WA, et al. Cyclophilin B deficiency causes abnormal dentin collagen matrix. J Proteome Res. 2017;16(8):2914‐2923. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Baksh S, Burns K, Andrin C, Michalak M. Interaction of calreticulin with protein disulfide isomerase. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:31338‐31344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Avezov E, Konno T, Zyryanova A, et al. Retarded PDI diffusion and a reductive shift in poise of the calcium depleted endoplasmic reticulum. BMC Biol. 2015;13:2. doi: 10.1186/s12915-014-0112-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Pietra D, Rumi E, Ferretti VV, et al. Differential clinical effects of different mutation subtypes in CALR‐mutant myeloproliferative neoplasms. Leukemia. 2016;30(2):431‐438. doi: 10.1038/leu.2015.277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Prins D, Gonzalez Arias C, Klampfl T, Grinfeld J, Green AR. Mutant Calreticulin in the myeloproliferative neoplasms. Hema. 2020;4(1):e333. doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000333 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Balligand T, Achouri Y, Pecquet C, et al. Knock‐in of murine Calr del52 induces essential thrombocythemia with slow‐rising dominance in mice and reveals key role of Calr exon 9 in cardiac development. Leukemia. 2020;34(2):510‐521. doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0538-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Chachoua I, Pecquet C, El‐Khoury M, et al. Thrombopoietin receptor activation by myeloproliferative neoplasm associated calreticulin mutants. Blood. 2016;127(10):1325‐1335. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-11-681932 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Edahiro Y, Araki M, Komatsu N. Mechanism underlying the development of myeloproliferative neoplasms through mutant calreticulin. Cancer Sci. 2020;111(8):2682‐2688. doi: 10.1111/cas.14503 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Masubuchi N, Araki M, Yang Y, et al. Mutant calreticulin interacts with MPL in the secretion pathway for activation on the cell surface. Leukemia. 2020;34(2):499‐509. doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0564-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Pecquet C, Chachoua I, Roy A, et al. Calreticulin mutants as oncogenic rogue chaperones for TpoR and traffic‐defective pathogenic TpoR mutants. Blood. 2019;133(25):2669‐2681. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-09-874578 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Shide K, Kameda T, Kamiunten A, et al. Calreticulin haploinsufficiency augments stem cell activity and is required for onset of myeloproliferative neoplasms in mice. Blood. 2020;136(1):106‐118. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019003358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Venkatesan A, Geng J, Kandarpa M, et al. Mechanism of mutant calreticulin‐mediated activation of the thrombopoietin receptor in cancers. J Cell Biol. 2021;220(7):e202009179. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202009179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Guijarro‐Hernandez A, Vizmanos JL. A broad overview of signaling in Ph‐negative classic myeloproliferative neoplasms. Cancer. 2021;13(5):984. doi: 10.3390/cancers13050984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Pecquet C, Papadopoulos N, Balligand T, et al. Secreted mutant Calreticulins As rogue cytokines in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2022;141(8):917‐929. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022016846 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Liu P, Zhao L, Loos F, et al. Immunosuppression by mutated Calreticulin released from malignant cells. Mol Cell. 2020;77(4):748‐760. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.11.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Ibarra J, Elbanna YA, Kurylowicz K, et al. Type I but not type II Calreticulin mutations activate the IRE1alpha/XBP1 pathway of the unfolded protein response to drive myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood Cancer Discov. 2022;3(4):298‐315. doi: 10.1158/2643-3230.BCD-21-0144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Bayes de Luna A, Elosua R. Sudden death. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2012;65(11):1039‐1052. doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2012.03.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Kuriachan VP, Sumner GL, Mitchell LB. Sudden cardiac death. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2015;40(4):133‐200. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2015.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Kumar A, Avishay DM, Jones CR, et al. Sudden cardiac death: epidemiology, pathogenesis and management. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2021;22(1):147‐158. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm.2021.01.207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Michalak M, Agellon LB. Stress coping strategies in the heart: an integrated view. Front Cardiovas Med. 2018;5:168. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Agellon LB, Michalak M. The endoplasmic reticulum and the cellular reticular network. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;981:61‐76. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-55858-5_4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Voeltz GK, Barr FA. Cell organelles. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2013;25(4):403‐405. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2013.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Chen X, Cubillos‐Ruiz JR. Endoplasmic reticulum stress signals in the tumour and its microenvironment. Nat Rev Cancer. 2021;21(2):71‐88. doi: 10.1038/s41568-020-00312-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. English AR, Voeltz GK. Endoplasmic reticulum structure and interconnections with other organelles. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013;5(4):a013227. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a013227 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Almeida C, Amaral MD. A central role of the endoplasmic reticulum in the cell emerges from its functional contact sites with multiple organelles. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020;77(23):4729‐4745. doi: 10.1007/s00018-020-03523-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Huang Y, Ji J, Zhao Q, Song J. Editorial: regulation of endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria in cellular homeostasis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:1004376. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.1004376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Mesgarzadeh JS, Buxbaum JN, Wiseman RL. Stress‐responsive regulation of extracellular proteostasis. J Cell Biol. 2022;221(4):e202112104. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202112104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Sassano ML, Felipe‐Abrio B, Agostinis P. ER‐mitochondria contact sites; a multifaceted factory for Ca2+ signaling and lipid transport. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:988014. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.988014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Wang WA, Agellon LB, Michalak M. Endoplasmic reticulum calcium dictates the distribution of intracellular unesterified cholesterol. Cell Calcium. 2018;76:116‐121. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2018.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Burdakov D, Ole H, Petersen B, Verkhratsky A. Intraluminal calcium as a primary regulator of endoplasmic reticulum function. Cell Calcium. 2005;38:303‐310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Levine TP, Patel S. Signalling at membrane contact sites: two membranes come together to handle second messengers. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2016;39:77‐83. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2016.02.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Phillips MJ, Voeltz GK. Structure and function of ER membrane contact sites with other organelles. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016;17(2):69‐82. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2015.8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Terasaki M, Runft LL, Hand AR. Changes in organization of the endoplasmic reticulum during Xenopus oocyte maturation and activation. Mol Biol Cell. 2001;12(4):1103‐1116. doi: 10.1091/mbc.12.4.1103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Saavedra MD, Mondejar I, Coy P, et al. Calreticulin from suboolemmal vesicles affects membrane regulation of polyspermy. Reproduction. 2014;147(3):369‐378. doi: 10.1530/REP-13-0454 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Nair S, Wearsch PA, Mitchell DA, Wassenberg JJ, Gilboa E, Nicchitta CV. Calreticulin displays in vivo peptide‐binding activity and can elicit CTL responses against bound peptides. J Immunol. 1999;162:6426‐6432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Pagny S, Cabanes‐Macheteau M, Gillikin JW, et al. Protein recycling from the Golgi apparatus to the endoplasmic reticulum in plants and its minor contribution to calreticulin retention. Plant Cell. 2000;12(5):739‐756. doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.5.739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Ding W, Albrecht B, Luo R, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum and cis‐Golgi localization of human T‐lymphotropic virus type 1 p12(I): association with calreticulin and calnexin. J Virol. 2001;75(16):7672‐7682. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.16.7672-7682.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Goicoechea S, Orr AW, Pallero MA, Eggleton P, Murphy‐Ullrich JE. Thrombospondin mediates focal adhesion disassembly through interactions with cell surface calreticulin. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(46):36358‐36368. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M005951200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Goicoechea S, Pallero MA, Eggleton P, Michalak M, Murphy‐Ullrich JE. The anti‐adhesive activity of thrombospondin is mediated by the N‐terminal domain of cell surface calreticulin. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(40):37219‐37228. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M202200200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Orr AW, Pedraza CE, Pallero MA, et al. Low density lipoprotein receptor‐related protein is a calreticulin coreceptor that signals focal adhesion disassembly. J Cell Biol. 2003;161(6):1179‐1189. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200302069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Pandya UM, Manzanares MA, Tellechea A, et al. Calreticulin exploits TGF‐beta for extracellular matrix induction engineering a tissue regenerative process. FASEB J. 2020;34(12):15849‐15874. doi: 10.1096/fj.202001161R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Nanney LB, Woodrell CD, Greives MR, et al. Calreticulin enhances porcine wound repair by diverse biological effects. Am J Pathol. 2008;173(3):610‐630. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.071027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Greives MR, Samra F, Pavlides SC, et al. Exogenous calreticulin improves diabetic wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2012;20(5):715‐730. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00822.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Gold LI, Rahman M, Blechman KM, et al. Overview of the role for calreticulin in the enhancement of wound healing through multiple biological effects. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2006;11(1):57‐65. doi: 10.1038/sj.jidsymp.5650011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Stack ME, Mishra S, Parimala Chelvi Ratnamani M, Wang H, Gold LI, Wang H. Biomimetic extracellular matrix nanofibers electrospun with Calreticulin promote synergistic activity for tissue regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022;14(46):51683‐51696. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c13887 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Cockram TOJ, Puigdellivol M, Brown GC. Calreticulin and Galectin‐3 opsonise bacteria for phagocytosis by microglia. Front Immunol 2019;10:2647. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02647 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Reid KM, Kitchener EJA, Butler CA, Cockram TOJ, Brown GC. Brain cells release Calreticulin that attracts and activates microglia, and inhibits amyloid Beta aggregation and neurotoxicity. Front Immunol. 2022;13:859686. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.859686 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Dai E, Stewart M, Ritchie B, et al. Calreticulin, a potential vascular regulatory protein, reduces intimal hyperplasia after arterial injury. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:2359‐2368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Gardai SJ, McPhillips KA, Frasch SC, et al. Cell‐surface calreticulin initiates clearance of viable or apoptotic cells through trans‐activation of LRP on the phagocyte. Cell. 2005;123(2):321‐334. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Obeid M, Tesniere A, Ghiringhelli F, et al. Calreticulin exposure dictates the immunogenicity of cancer cell death. Nat Med. 2007;13(1):54‐61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Krysko DV, Garg AD, Kaczmarek A, Krysko O, Agostinis P, Vandenabeele P. Immunogenic cell death and DAMPs in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(12):860‐875. doi: 10.1038/nrc3380 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Chao MP, Jaiswal S, Weissman‐Tsukamoto R, et al. Calreticulin is the dominant pro‐phagocytic signal on multiple human cancers and is counterbalanced by CD47. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2(63):63ra94. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Garg AD, Krysko DV, Verfaillie T, et al. A novel pathway combining calreticulin exposure and ATP secretion in immunogenic cancer cell death. EMBO J. 2012;31(5):1062‐1079. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.497 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Kliueva NG, Roskin GI. The antibiotic cruzin and its mechanism of action on cancer cells. Izv Akad Nauk Kirg Ssr Biol. 1963;3:366‐390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Ferreira V, Molina MC, Valck C, et al. Role of calreticulin from parasites in its interaction with vertebrate hosts. Mol Immunol. 2004;40(17):1279‐1291. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2003.11.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. Ferreira V, Valck C, Sanchez G, et al. The classical activation pathway of the human complement system is specifically inhibited by calreticulin from Trypanosoma cruzi . J Immunol. 2004;172(5):3042‐3050. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.5.3042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164. Lopez NC, Valck C, Ramirez G, et al. Antiangiogenic and antitumor effects of Trypanosoma cruzi Calreticulin. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4(7):e730. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000730 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. Cruz P, Sosoniuk‐Roche E, Maldonado I, Torres CG, Ferreira A. Trypanosoma cruzi calreticulin: In vitro modulation of key immunogenic markers of both canine tumors and relevant immune competent cells. Immunobiology. 2020;225(2):151892. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2019.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Pena Alvarez J, Teneb J, Maldonado I, et al. Structural bases that underline Trypanosoma cruzi calreticulin proinfective, antiangiogenic and antitumor properties. Immunobiology. 2020;225(1):151863. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2019.10.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Ramirez‐Toloza G, Sosoniuk‐Roche E, Valck C, Aguilar‐Guzman L, Ferreira VP, Ferreira A. Trypanosoma cruzi Calreticulin: immune evasion, infectivity, and tumorigenesis. Trends Parasitol. 2020;36(4):368‐381. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2020.01.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Sosoniuk‐Roche E, Cruz P, Maldonado I, et al. In vitro treatment of a murine mammary adenocarcinoma cell line with recombinant Trypanosoma cruzi Calreticulin promotes immunogenicity and phagocytosis. Mol Immunol. 2020;124:51‐60. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2020.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169. Ramirez‐Toloza G, Aguilar‐Guzman L, Valck C, Ferreira VP, Ferreira A. The interactions of parasite Calreticulin with initial complement components: consequences in immunity and virulence. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1561. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01561 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. Panaretakis T, Joza N, Modjtahedi N, et al. The co‐translocation of ERp57 and calreticulin determines the immunogenicity of cell death. Cell Death Differ. 2008;15:1499‐1509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. Wiersma VR, Michalak M, Abdullah TM, Bremer E, Eggleton P. Mechanisms of translocation of ER chaperones to the cell surface and immunomodulatory roles in cancer and autoimmunity. Front Oncol. 2015;5:7. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172. Benyair R, Ron E, Lederkremer GZ. Protein quality control, retention, and degradation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2011;292:197‐280. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-386033-0.00005-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173. Wearsch PA, Cresswell P. The quality control of MHC class I peptide loading. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008;20(6):624‐631. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2008.09.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174. Blum JS, Wearsch PA, Cresswell P. Pathways of antigen processing. Annu Rev Immunol. 2013;31:443‐473. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032712-095910 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175. Sun Z, Brodsky JL. Protein quality control in the secretory pathway. J Cell Biol. 2019;218(10):3171‐3187. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201906047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176. Hol EM, Scheper W. Protein quality control in neurodegeneration: walking the tight rope between health and disease. J Mol Neurosci. 2008;34(1):23‐33. doi: 10.1007/s12031-007-0013-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177. Dejgaard S, Nicolay J, Taheri M, Thomas DY, Bergeron JJ. The ER glycoprotein quality control system. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2004;6(1):29‐42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178. Koerner CM, Roberts BS, Neher SB. Endoplasmic reticulum quality control in lipoprotein metabolism. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2019;498:110547. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2019.110547 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179. Chino H, Mizushima N. ER‐Phagy: Quality and quantity control of the endoplasmic reticulum by autophagy. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2022;15(1):a041256. 10.1101/cshperspect.a041256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180. Molinari M, Hebert DN. Glycoprotein maturation and quality control. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2015;41:70. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181. Lamriben L, Graham JB, Adams BM, Hebert DN. N‐glycan‐based ER molecular chaperone and protein quality control system: the Calnexin binding cycle. Traffic. 2016;17(4):308‐326. doi: 10.1111/tra.12358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182. Danilczyk UG, Cohen‐Doyle MF, Williams DB. Functional relationship between Calreticulin, Calnexin, and the endoplasmic reticulum luminal domain of Calnexin. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(17):13089‐13097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183. Kang SJ, Cresswell P. Calnexin, calreticulin, and ERp57 cooperate in disulfide bond formation in human CD1d heavy chain. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(47):44838‐44844. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M207831200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184. Sadasivan B, Lehner PJ, Ortmann B, Spies T, Cresswell P. Roles for calreticulin and a novel glycoprotein, tapasin, in the interaction of MHC class I molecules with TAP. Immunity. 1996;5(2):103‐114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185. Gao B, Adhikari R, Howarth M, et al. Assembly and antigen‐presenting function of MHC class I molecules in cells lacking the ER chaperone calreticulin. Immunity. 2002;16(1):99‐109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186. Chapman DC, Williams DB. ER quality control in the biogenesis of MHC class I molecules. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2010;21(5):512‐519. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.12.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187. Margulies DH, Taylor DK, Jiang J, et al. Chaperones and catalysts: How antigen presentation pathways cope with biological necessity. Front Immunol. 2022;13:859782. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.859782 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188. Arshad N, Cresswell P. Tumor‐associated calreticulin variants functionally compromise the peptide loading complex and impair its recruitment of MHC‐I. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(25):9555‐9569. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.002836 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189. Arshad N, Cresswell P. Impact of Calreticulin and its mutants on endoplasmic reticulum function in health and disease. Prog Mol Subcell Biol. 2021;59:163‐180. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-67696-4_8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190. Peaper DR, Cresswell P. Regulation of MHC class I assembly and peptide binding. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2008;24:343‐368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191. Corbett EF, Michalak M. Calcium, a signaling molecule in the endoplasmic reticulum? Trends Biochem Sci. 2000;25(7):307‐311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192. Yu R, Hinkle PM. Rapid turnover of calcium in the endoplasmic reticulum during signaling. Studies with cameleon calcium indicators. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(31):23648‐23653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193. Solovyova N, Fernyhough P, Glazner G, Verkhratsky A. Xestospongin C empties the ER calcium store but does not inhibit InsP3‐induced Ca2+ release in cultured dorsal root ganglia neurones. Cell Calcium. 2002;32(1):49‐52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194. Alvarez J, Montero M. Measuring [Ca2+] in the endoplasmic reticulum with aequorin. Cell Calcium. 2002;32(5–6):251‐260. doi: 10.1016/s0143416002001860 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195. Bygrave FL, Benedetti A. What is the concentration of calcium ions in the endoplasmic reticulum? Cell Calcium. 1996;19(6):547‐551. doi: 10.1016/s0143-4160(96)90064-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196. Rossi AM, Taylor CW. Reliable measurement of free Ca2+ concentrations in the ER lumen using mag‐Fluo‐4. Cell Calcium. 2020;87:102188. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2020.102188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197. Berridge MJ, Lipp P, Bootman MD. The versatility and universality of calcium signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2000;1(1):11‐21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198. Petersen OH, Verkhratsky A. Endoplasmic reticulum calcium tunnels integrate signalling in polarised cells. Cell Calcium. 2007;42(4–5):373‐378. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2007.05.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199. Holcman D, Parutto P, Chambers JE, et al. Single particle trajectories reveal active endoplasmic reticulum luminal flow. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20(10):1118‐1125. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0192-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200. Corbett EF, Oikawa K, Francois P, et al. Ca2+ regulation of interactions between endoplasmic reticulum chaperones. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(10):6203‐6211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201. Tanikawa Y, Kanemura S, Ito D, et al. Ca2+ regulates ERp57‐Calnexin complex formation. Molecules. 2021;26(10):2853. doi: 10.3390/molecules26102853 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202. Santulli G, Nakashima R, Yuan Q, Marks AR. Intracellular calcium release channels: an update. J Physiol. 2017;595(10):3041‐3051. doi: 10.1113/JP272781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203. Prole DL, Taylor CW. Structure and function of IP3 receptors. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2019;11(4):a035063. 10.1101/cshperspect.a035063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204. Roos J, DiGregorio PJ, Yeromin AV, et al. STIM1, an essential and conserved component of store‐operated Ca2+ channel function. J Cell Biol. 2005;169(3):435‐445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205. Soboloff J, Rothberg BS, Madesh M, Gill DL. STIM proteins: dynamic calcium signal transducers. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012;13(9):549‐565. doi: 10.1038/nrm3414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206. Liou J, Kim ML, Heo WD, et al. STIM is a Ca2+ sensor essential for Ca2+‐store‐depletion‐triggered Ca2+ influx. Curr Biol. 2005;15(13):1235‐1241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207. Zhang SL, Yu Y, Roos J, et al. STIM1 is a Ca2+ sensor that activates CRAC channels and migrates from the Ca2+ store to the plasma membrane. Nature. 2005;437(7060):902‐905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208. Wang WA, Demaurex N. Proteins interacting with STIM1 and store‐operated Ca2+ entry. Prog Mol Subcell Biol. 2021;59:51‐97. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-67696-4_4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209. Bodnar D, Chung WY, Yang D, Hong JH, Jha A, Muallem S. STIM‐TRP pathways and microdomain organization: Ca2+ influx channels: the Orai‐STIM1‐TRPC complexes. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;993:139‐157. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-57732-6_8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210. Wang X, Deng Y, Zhang G, et al. Spliced x‐box binding protein 1 stimulates adaptive growth through activation of mTOR. Circulation. 2019;140(7):566‐579. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.118.038924 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211. Coe H, Michalak M. Calcium binding chaperones of the endoplasmic reticulum. Gen Physiol Biophys. 2009;28:F96‐F103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212. Serwach K, Gruszczynska‐Biegala J. Target molecules of STIM proteins in the central nervous system. Front Mol Neurosci. 2020;13:617422. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2020.617422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213. Camacho P, Lechleiter JD. Calreticulin inhibits repetitive intracellular Ca2+ waves. Cell. 1995;82(5):765‐771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214. John LM, Lechleiter JD, Camacho P. Differential modulation of SERCA2 isoforms by calreticulin. J Cell Biol. 1998;142:963‐973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215. Li Y, Camacho P. Ca2+‐dependent redox modulation of SERCA2b by ERp57. J Cell Biol. 2004;164(1):35‐46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216. Xu W, Longo FJ, Wintermantel MR, Jiang X, Clark RA, DeLisle S. Calreticulin modulates capacitative Ca2+ influx by controlling the extent of inositol 1,4,5‐trisphosphate‐induced Ca2+ store depletion. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(47):36676‐36682. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M002041200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217. Arnaudeau S, Frieden M, Nakamura K, Castelbou C, Michalak M, Demaurex N. Calreticulin differentially modulates calcium uptake and release in the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(48):46696‐46705. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M202395200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218. Di Buduo CA, Abbonante V, Marty C, et al. Defective interaction of mutant calreticulin and SOCE in megakaryocytes from patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2020;135(2):133‐144. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019001103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219. Prins D, Groenendyk J, Touret N, Michalak M. Modulation of STIM1 and capacitative Ca2+ entry by the endoplasmic reticulum luminal oxidoreductase ERp57. EMBO rep. 2011;12(11):1182‐1188. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220. Papp S, Dziak E, Michalak M, Opas M. Is all of the endoplasmic reticulum created equal? The effects of the heterogeneous distribution of endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+‐handling proteins. J Cell Biol. 2003;160(4):475‐479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221. Nguyen DT, Le TM, Hattori T, et al. The ATF6beta‐calreticulin axis promotes neuronal survival under endoplasmic reticulum stress and excitotoxicity. Sci rep. 2021;11(1):13086. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92529-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222. Tanaka T, Nguyen DT, Kwankaew N, et al. ATF6beta deficiency elicits anxiety‐like behavior and hyperactivity under stress conditions. Neurochem Res. 2023;48(7):2175‐2186. doi: 10.1007/s11064-023-03900-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223. Bravo R, Vicencio JM, Parra V, et al. Increased ER‐mitochondrial coupling promotes mitochondrial respiration and bioenergetics during early phases of ER stress. J Cell Sci. 2011;124(13):2143‐2152. doi: 10.1242/jcs.080762 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224. Yong J, Bischof H, Burgstaller S, et al. Mitochondria supply ATP to the ER through a mechanism antagonized by cytosolic Ca2+. Elife. 2019;8:49682. doi: 10.7554/eLife.49682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225. Wang Q, Calsequestrin MM. Structure, function, and evolution. Cell Calcium. 2020;90:102242. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2020.102242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226. Rossi D, Gamberucci A, Pierantozzi E, Amato C, Migliore L, Sorrentino V. Calsequestrin, a key protein in striated muscle health and disease. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2021;42(2):267‐279. doi: 10.1007/s10974-020-09583-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227. Galligan JJ, Petersen DR. The human protein disulfide isomerase gene family. Hum Genomics. 2012;6:6. doi: 10.1186/1479-7364-6-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228. Kim E, Youn B, Kemper L, et al. Characterization of human cardiac calsequestrin and its deleterious mutants. J Mol Biol. 2007;373(4):1047‐1057. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.08.055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229. Gatti G, Trifari S, Mesaeli M, Parker JMR, Michalak M, Meldolesi J. Head‐to‐tail oligomerization of calsequestrin: a novel mechanism for heterogeneous distribution of ER luminal proteins. J Cell Biol. 2001;154:525‐534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230. Kumar A, Chakravarty H, Bal NC, et al. Identification of calcium binding sites on calsequestrin 1 and their implications for polymerization. Mol Biosyst. 2013;9(7):1949‐1957. doi: 10.1039/c3mb25588c [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231. Rauch F, Prud'homme J, Arabian A, Dedhar S, St‐Arnaud R. Heart, brain, and body wall defects in mice lacking calreticulin. Exp Cell Res. 2000;256:105‐111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232. Li J, Puceat M, Perez‐Terzic C, et al. Calreticulin reveals a critical Ca2+ checkpoint in cardiac myofibrillogenesis. J Cell Biol. 2002;158(1):103‐113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233. Dewenter M, von der Lieth A, Katus HA, Backs J. Calcium signaling and transcriptional regulation in Cardiomyocytes. Circ Res. 2017;121(8):1000‐1020. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.310355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234. Porter GA Jr, Makuck RF, Rivkees SA. Intracellular calcium plays an essential role in cardiac development. Dev Dyn. 2003;227(2):280‐290. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.10307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235. Guo L, Nakamura K, Lynch J, et al. Cardiac‐specific expression of calcineurin reverses embryonic lethality in calreticulin‐deficient mouse. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(52):50776‐50779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236. Molkentin JD. Calcineurin and beyond: cardiac hypertrophic signaling. Circ Res. 2000;87(9):731‐738. doi: 10.1161/01.res.87.9.731 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237. Tyser RC, Miranda AM, Chen CM, Davidson SM, Srinivas S, Riley PR. Calcium handling precedes cardiac differentiation to initiate the first heartbeat. Elife. 2016;5:17113. doi: 10.7554/Elife.17113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238. Lynch JM, Chilibeck K, Qui Y, Michalak M. Assembling pieces of the cardiac puzzle; calreticulin and calcium‐dependent pathways in cardiac development, health, and disease. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2006;16(3):65‐69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239. Molkentin JD, Lu JR, Antos CL, et al. A calcineurin‐dependent transcriptional pathway for cardiac hypertrophy. Cell. 1998;93:215‐228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240. Crabtree GR, Olson EN. NFAT signaling: choreographing the social lives of cells. Cell. 2002;109:S67‐S79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241. O'Keefe SJ, Tamura J, Kincaid RL, Tocci MJ, O'Neill EA. FK‐506‐ and CsA‐sensitive activation of the interleukin‐2 promoter by calcineurin. Nature. 1992;357:692‐694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242. Jaconi M, Bony C, Richards SM, et al. Inositol 1,4,5‐trisphosphate directs Ca2+ flow between mitochondria and the endoplasmic/sarcoplasmic reticulum: a role in regulating cardiac autonomic Ca2+ spiking. Mol Biol Cell. 2000;11(5):1845‐1858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243. Mery A, Aimond F, Menard C, Mikoshiba K, Michalak M, Puceat M. Initiation of embryonic cardiac pacemaker activity by inositol 1,4,5‐trisphosphate‐dependent calcium signaling. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16(5):2414‐2423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244. Michalak M, Burns K, Andrin C, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum form of calreticulin modulates glucocorticoid‐sensitive gene expression. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:29436‐29445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245. Shago M, Flock G, Leung Hagesteijn CY, et al. Modulation of the retinoic acid and retinoid X receptor signaling pathways in P19 embryonal carcinoma cells by calreticulin. Exp Cell Res. 1997;230:50‐60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246. Dedhar S, Rennie PS, Shago M, et al. Inhibition of nuclear hormone receptor activity by calreticulin. Nature. 1994;367:480‐483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247. Burns K, Duggan B, Atkinson EA, et al. Modulation of gene expression by calreticulin binding to the glucocorticoid receptor. Nature. 1994;367:476‐480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248. Burns K, Opas M, Michalak M. Calreticulin inhibits glucocorticoid‐ but not cAMP‐sensitive expression of tyrosine aminotransferase gene in cultured McA‐RH7777 hepatocytes. Mol Cell Biochem. 1997;171:37‐43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249. Nakamura K, Robertson M, Liu G, et al. Complete heart block and sudden death in mice overexpressing calreticulin. J Clin Invest. 2001;107(10):1245‐1253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250. Baruteau AE, Pass RH, Thambo JB, et al. Congenital and childhood atrioventricular blocks: pathophysiology and contemporary management. Eur J Pediatr. 2016;175(9):1235‐1248. doi: 10.1007/s00431-016-2748-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251. Lee D, Oka T, Hunter B, et al. Calreticulin induces dilated cardiomyopathy. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252. Groenendyk J, Lee D, Jung J, et al. Inhibition of the unfolded protein response mechanism prevents cardiac fibrosis. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0159682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253. Beuers U, Nathanson MH, Boyer JL. Effects of tauroursodeoxycholic acid on cytosolic Ca2+ signals in isolated rat hepatocytes. Gastroenterology. 1993;104(2):604‐612. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(93)90433-d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254. Turdi S, Hu N, Ren J. Tauroursodeoxycholic acid mitigates high fat diet‐induced cardiomyocyte contractile and intracellular Ca2+ anomalies. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e63615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255. Lebeau PF, Platko K, Byun JH, Austin RC. Calcium as a reliable marker for the quantitative assessment of endoplasmic reticulum stress in live cells. J Biol Chem. 2021;296:100779. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100779 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256. Knollmann BC, Chopra N, Hlaing T, et al. Casq2 deletion causes sarcoplasmic reticulum volume increase, premature Ca2+ release, and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. J Clin Invest. 2006;116(9):2510‐2520. doi: 10.1172/JCI29128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257. Song L, Alcalai R, Arad M, et al. Calsequestrin 2 (CASQ2) mutations increase expression of calreticulin and ryanodine receptors, causing catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(7):1814‐1823. doi: 10.1172/JCI31080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable


Articles from Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine are provided here courtesy of Blackwell Publishing

RESOURCES